Miller - FGD Gypsum Production, Processing, And Disposal

download Miller - FGD Gypsum Production, Processing, And Disposal

of 31

Transcript of Miller - FGD Gypsum Production, Processing, And Disposal

  • 8/12/2019 Miller - FGD Gypsum Production, Processing, And Disposal

    1/31

    FLUE GAS DESULFURIZATION (FGD)GYPSUM PRODUCTION, PROCESSING

    AND DISPOSAL

    Presented ByE. Cheri Miller

    Specialist, Fuel By-Products and MarketingTennessee Valley Authority

  • 8/12/2019 Miller - FGD Gypsum Production, Processing, And Disposal

    2/31

    WHAT ARE FGD SCRUBBERS?

  • 8/12/2019 Miller - FGD Gypsum Production, Processing, And Disposal

    3/31

    FGD PRODUCTS

    Many different products from the variousFGD processes, primarily: Lime/limestone force oxidized (LSFO) =

    Calcium sulfate dihydrate (gypsum) Lime/limestone unoxidized = Calcium sulfite

    Fluidized bed ash and dry scrubbers =mixtures of char/fly ash and spent bed

    material or sorbent containing CaO, CaSO4,CaSO3 and ash

    Wet ammonia = ammonium sulfate

  • 8/12/2019 Miller - FGD Gypsum Production, Processing, And Disposal

    4/31

    FGD PRODUCTS (cont.)

    Products of Lime/Limestone Forced Oxidation processesare most often sought for agricultural use Readily dewater to 7-12% moisture even without mechanical

    dewatering equipment Are easily reclaimed from ponds, stored, transported and spread

    using conventional equipmentUnoxidized Lime/Limestone FGD products arethixotropic sludges (consistency of toothpastemayliquify when shaken) Difficult to dewater

    Require some sort of processing or admixture such as fly ash orlime to achieve moisture levels that can be handled Cannot be easily stored, transported or spread with conventional

    agricultural equipment

  • 8/12/2019 Miller - FGD Gypsum Production, Processing, And Disposal

    5/31

    FGD Gypsum ManagementIn once-through systems, bleed stream from

    the scrubber absorber tank is usually at 12-30% solids and low chloride levels. Filtratefrom gypsum dewatering is not recycled

    In closed loop systems, absorber tank willconcentrate chloride levels to very high levels(20,000 ppm or more) as filtrate from gypsumdewatering is recycled back into the scrubber

    cycle

  • 8/12/2019 Miller - FGD Gypsum Production, Processing, And Disposal

    6/31

    Limestone Forced Oxidation

    Process

  • 8/12/2019 Miller - FGD Gypsum Production, Processing, And Disposal

    7/31

    FGD Gypsum Management(cont.)

    Gypsum can be mechanically dewatered

    using vacuum filters, rotary drum filters orcentrifugesMechanical dewatering results in a gypsum

    cake product which can have moisture levels

    as low as 5%Mechanical dewatering also allows for

    control of particle size, chloride content andremoval of impurities

  • 8/12/2019 Miller - FGD Gypsum Production, Processing, And Disposal

    8/31

    Vacuum Filter Belt

  • 8/12/2019 Miller - FGD Gypsum Production, Processing, And Disposal

    9/31

    FGD Gypsum Management(cont.)

    Gypsum can also be dewatered in ponds

    managed as rim ditch stacksThe large size of FGD gypsum particles (average

    45 microns) allows the material to readily dewaterin ponds

    Gypsum ponds/stacks can dewater product to

    7-12% moisture by natural gravity drainage anddrying depending on temperature and rainfall

  • 8/12/2019 Miller - FGD Gypsum Production, Processing, And Disposal

    10/31

    Overview of LSFO Operation

    Gypsum Pond with Fly Ash Silosin Foreground

  • 8/12/2019 Miller - FGD Gypsum Production, Processing, And Disposal

    11/31

    Rim Ditch Stacking

  • 8/12/2019 Miller - FGD Gypsum Production, Processing, And Disposal

    12/31

    Rim Ditch Stacking (cont.)

    FGD Gypsum which has been

    deposited in a pond or stack is easilyreclaimed for marketing using eitherconventional earth moving equipment,

    orCan be reclaimed using a hydraulic

    dredge and re-slurried back through the

    mechanical dewatering system

  • 8/12/2019 Miller - FGD Gypsum Production, Processing, And Disposal

    13/31

    Hydraulic Dredging from GypsumStack

  • 8/12/2019 Miller - FGD Gypsum Production, Processing, And Disposal

    14/31

    Mining Gypsum from RimDitch Stack Using Earthmoving

    Equipment

  • 8/12/2019 Miller - FGD Gypsum Production, Processing, And Disposal

    15/31

    FGD Gypsum Handling Issues

    Dewatered gypsum is usually stored in a

    roofed storage shed to avoid accumulatingadditional moisture from precipitation and toprovide wind screens to prevent dusting

    Reclaimed gypsum on ponds will form acrust which helps shed water and preventsdusting so long as it is undisturbed. If thecrust is broken it can cause a dusting

    problem

  • 8/12/2019 Miller - FGD Gypsum Production, Processing, And Disposal

    16/31

    Loading Trucks with GypsumInside Covered Storage Shed

  • 8/12/2019 Miller - FGD Gypsum Production, Processing, And Disposal

    17/31

    FGD Gypsum Handling Issues

    Even at moisture contents as low as

    5% loading does not usually cause adust problem

    Covered conveyors help prevent dustproblems at transfer points

  • 8/12/2019 Miller - FGD Gypsum Production, Processing, And Disposal

    18/31

    Gypsum Truck Dump-CoveredConveyor

  • 8/12/2019 Miller - FGD Gypsum Production, Processing, And Disposal

    19/31

    Loading Barge

  • 8/12/2019 Miller - FGD Gypsum Production, Processing, And Disposal

    20/31

    Aerial View of Barge

    Loadout

  • 8/12/2019 Miller - FGD Gypsum Production, Processing, And Disposal

    21/31

    Cost/BenefitMarketing/Disposal

    The O&M cost of FGD gypsum disposal in rimditch ponds is very low1 million tons/year because in reality you aremoving less than 10-20% of the material in theperimeter dikesthe rest stacks itself in the center ofthe rim ditch stack

    Non-routine O&M is also lowPlacement of cover material and revegetation on side slopesRaising spillwaysDust controlGW/Surface water monitoring

  • 8/12/2019 Miller - FGD Gypsum Production, Processing, And Disposal

    22/31

    Cost/BenefitMarketing/Disposal(cont.)

    Once a utility has paid to place material in a disposalfacility, the cost of disposal is a sunk cost which cannotbe recovered

    In order to avoid disposal costs, material must be

    diverted beforedisposalreclaiming material afterdisposal has no cost savings benefits

    In addition, even if you divert material before disposal,you will not realize any cost savings unless you moveenough material to be able to reduce manpower or

    equipment at the disposal facilityWhy? Because the relationship between disposal costand tons is not a straight-line relationship

  • 8/12/2019 Miller - FGD Gypsum Production, Processing, And Disposal

    23/31

    Avoided Cost of Disposal

    Tons to Landfill

    To

    talCost

    FixedCost

    Average

    Cost

    ActualCost

    Averagewith

    FixedCost

    Break Points

  • 8/12/2019 Miller - FGD Gypsum Production, Processing, And Disposal

    24/31

    Cost/BenefitMarketing/Disposal(cont.)

    Example:

    Total annual O&M cost of facility = $500K

    Total tons disposed = 500K/year

    Nominal disposal cost = $1/ton/year

    Sell 50,000 tons/year

    No cost savings because your manpower and

    equipment costs have not been reduced In fact, your cost/ton actually increases (e.g.

    $500K/450K tons = $1.11/ton)

  • 8/12/2019 Miller - FGD Gypsum Production, Processing, And Disposal

    25/31

    Cost/BenefitMarketing/Disposal(cont.)

    In order to divert FGD gypsum prior to disposal, the material mustbe mechanically dewatered Cost of dewatering facility = $3-6 M capital Costs about $3/ton to operate dewatering facility

    It is doubtful that mechanical dewatering can be justified basedsolely on an agricultural market

    At sites where FGD gypsum must be mechanically dewatered sothat it can be hauled to a stacking area for disposal, the utility mayavoid a significant disposal cost by developing agricultural marketsCost of hauling to a stacking area for disposal will be very sitespecific dependent upon the distance hauled, site developmentcosts and regulatory requirements.Rule-of-Thumb for estimating trucking costs: $1/ton to load truck,$1/ton for first mile, $0.10/ton for each additional mile hauled.

  • 8/12/2019 Miller - FGD Gypsum Production, Processing, And Disposal

    26/31

    Potential Markets for FGDGypsum

    North American Production2004 =

    12 M tons

    Use - 2004Wallboard = 8.1 M tons

    Cement = 0.74 M tons

    Agriculture = 0.13 M tons

    Other = 0.025 M tons

  • 8/12/2019 Miller - FGD Gypsum Production, Processing, And Disposal

    27/31

    Potential Markets for FGDGypsum

    Future North American Production

    2015 = over 20 million tonsWallboard

    Five new wallboard plants have been announced

    which will run on FGD GypsumTotal usage in these plants will approach 3-5 M

    tons/yr accounting for 12 M tons/yr

  • 8/12/2019 Miller - FGD Gypsum Production, Processing, And Disposal

    28/31

    New Wallboard PlantsDesigned for Synthetic Gypsum

    1

    8

    7

    9

    5

    6

    2

    4

    3

    10 11

    12**

    United States Gypsum Company - February 17, 2005

  • 8/12/2019 Miller - FGD Gypsum Production, Processing, And Disposal

    29/31

    Potential Markets for FGDGypsum

    Cement

    Although several newcement kilns are planned forNorth America, use in cement(as a set retardant and

    grinding aid) will notsignificantly increase FGDGypsum use

  • 8/12/2019 Miller - FGD Gypsum Production, Processing, And Disposal

    30/31

    Potential Markets for FGDGypsum

    AgricultureUse of FGD Gypsum in agriculture is

    the market with the greatest potentialfor expanding gypsum use

    Application rates will average 1-5tons/acre

    Concerns about heavy metals in

    FGD Gypsum may dampenacceptance in this market

  • 8/12/2019 Miller - FGD Gypsum Production, Processing, And Disposal

    31/31

    Conclusions

    Total amount of FGD gypsum available for agricultural use will be ~ 7-8 million tons/year by 2015Not all FGD gypsum will be acceptable for agricultural use because ofhigh chloride content and potential perception issues associated withheavy metalsMany FGD gypsum sources will not be located in areas where the

    cost/benefit of using FGD gypsum for soil amendment will justify thecost of transporting and handling the materialAgricultural use of FGD gypsum will probably be opportunistic,developing primarily in agricultural areas very close to sources ofmaterial, or at sites where the utility has disposal costs that are veryhighAt power plants where the FGD gypsum cannot be diverted prior to

    disposal and/or where significant quantities cannot be marketed, theutility will not be able to justify paying subsidies to market FGDgypsumIf FGD gypsum is to be accepted as a bona fidecommodity, the cost ofutilizing the material should be borne by the end userpayment ofsubsidies for use of byproduct materials is usually viewed withsuspicion by regulators