MILGRAM’S EXPERIMENT A STUDY IN OBEDIENCE AP PSYCHOLOGY Wadlington AP PSYCHOLOGY Wadlington.

19
MILGRAM’S EXPERIMENT A STUDY IN OBEDIENCE AP PSYCHOLOGY Wadlington

Transcript of MILGRAM’S EXPERIMENT A STUDY IN OBEDIENCE AP PSYCHOLOGY Wadlington AP PSYCHOLOGY Wadlington.

Page 1: MILGRAM’S EXPERIMENT A STUDY IN OBEDIENCE AP PSYCHOLOGY Wadlington AP PSYCHOLOGY Wadlington.

MILGRAM’S EXPERIMENT

A STUDY IN OBEDIENCE

MILGRAM’S EXPERIMENT

A STUDY IN OBEDIENCE

AP PSYCHOLOGYWadlington

AP PSYCHOLOGYWadlington

Page 2: MILGRAM’S EXPERIMENT A STUDY IN OBEDIENCE AP PSYCHOLOGY Wadlington AP PSYCHOLOGY Wadlington.

What was the Experiment?

The Milgram Experiment was a social psychology experiment conducted by Yale University psychologist Stanley Milgram.

It measured the willingness of participants to obey an authority figure who instructed them to perform acts that possibly conflicted with their personal conscience.

Stanley Milgram

Page 3: MILGRAM’S EXPERIMENT A STUDY IN OBEDIENCE AP PSYCHOLOGY Wadlington AP PSYCHOLOGY Wadlington.

Milgram’s Experiment The experiments began in July 1961, three

months after the start of the trial of Nazi war criminal Adolf Eichmann.

Milgram devised the experiments to answer the question: "Could it be that Eichmann and his million accomplices in the Holocaust were just following orders?”

Page 4: MILGRAM’S EXPERIMENT A STUDY IN OBEDIENCE AP PSYCHOLOGY Wadlington AP PSYCHOLOGY Wadlington.

Experiment Participants There were three roles in

the experiment:1. Experimenter 2. Teacher3. Learner

In this experiment, both the experimenter and the learner were actors following a script.

The only person really being experimented on was the “teacher.”

Page 5: MILGRAM’S EXPERIMENT A STUDY IN OBEDIENCE AP PSYCHOLOGY Wadlington AP PSYCHOLOGY Wadlington.

The Experimenter and Learner The role of the experimenter was played

by a stern, impassive biology teacher dressed in a technician's coat, and the learner was played by an Irish-American accountant trained to act for the role.

Page 6: MILGRAM’S EXPERIMENT A STUDY IN OBEDIENCE AP PSYCHOLOGY Wadlington AP PSYCHOLOGY Wadlington.

The Setup The participant and the learner were told

by the experimenter that they would be participating in an experiment helping his study of memory and learning in different situations.

Two slips of paper were then presented to the participant and to the actor. The participant was led to believe that one of the slips said "learner" and the other said "teacher," and that he and the actor had been given the slips randomly. In reality, both said “teacher.”

Page 7: MILGRAM’S EXPERIMENT A STUDY IN OBEDIENCE AP PSYCHOLOGY Wadlington AP PSYCHOLOGY Wadlington.

Strapping Down the Learner The “teacher” then had to help strap

the “learner” into a chair and attach electrical clamps to him.

The “learner” was sure to mention the fact that he had a heart condition.

Page 8: MILGRAM’S EXPERIMENT A STUDY IN OBEDIENCE AP PSYCHOLOGY Wadlington AP PSYCHOLOGY Wadlington.

Separation

The “teacher” and the experimenter then went to a connected, room. The "teacher" was given a 45-volt electric shock from the electro-shock generator as a sample of the shock that the "learner" would supposedly receive during the experiment.

Page 9: MILGRAM’S EXPERIMENT A STUDY IN OBEDIENCE AP PSYCHOLOGY Wadlington AP PSYCHOLOGY Wadlington.

The “Test” The "teacher" was then given a list of

word pairs which he was to teach the learner. The teacher began by reading the list of word pairs to the learner.

The teacher would then read the first word of each pair and read four possible answers. The learner would press a button to indicate his response.

If the answer was incorrect, the teacher would administer a shock to the learner, with the voltage increasing for each wrong answer. If correct, the teacher would read the next word pair.

Page 10: MILGRAM’S EXPERIMENT A STUDY IN OBEDIENCE AP PSYCHOLOGY Wadlington AP PSYCHOLOGY Wadlington.

The Room Setup

Page 11: MILGRAM’S EXPERIMENT A STUDY IN OBEDIENCE AP PSYCHOLOGY Wadlington AP PSYCHOLOGY Wadlington.

Deception The subjects believed that for each

wrong answer, the learner was receiving actual shocks. In reality, there were no shocks.

After the confederate was separated from the subject, the confederate set up a tape recorder integrated with the electro-shock generator, which played pre-recorded sounds for each shock level.

Page 12: MILGRAM’S EXPERIMENT A STUDY IN OBEDIENCE AP PSYCHOLOGY Wadlington AP PSYCHOLOGY Wadlington.

Low Level Shock After a number of

voltage level increases, the actor started to bang on the wall that separated him from the subject.

After several times banging on the wall and complaining about his heart condition, all responses by the learner would cease.

Page 13: MILGRAM’S EXPERIMENT A STUDY IN OBEDIENCE AP PSYCHOLOGY Wadlington AP PSYCHOLOGY Wadlington.

Early Reactions

At this point, many people indicated their desire to stop the experiment and check on the learner. Some test subjects paused at 135 volts and began to question the purpose of the experiment. Most continued after being assured that they would not be held responsible.

Page 14: MILGRAM’S EXPERIMENT A STUDY IN OBEDIENCE AP PSYCHOLOGY Wadlington AP PSYCHOLOGY Wadlington.

Small Prompts

If at any time the subject indicated his desire to halt the experiment, he was given a succession of verbal prods by the experimenter, in this order:

• “Please continue”• “The experiment requires that you continue”• “It is absolutely essential that you continue”• “You have no other choice, you must go on”

Page 15: MILGRAM’S EXPERIMENT A STUDY IN OBEDIENCE AP PSYCHOLOGY Wadlington AP PSYCHOLOGY Wadlington.

Putting a Stop to Things If the subject still wished to stop after

all four successive verbal prods, the experiment was halted. Otherwise, it was halted after the subject had given the maximum 450-volt shock three times in succession.

Page 16: MILGRAM’S EXPERIMENT A STUDY IN OBEDIENCE AP PSYCHOLOGY Wadlington AP PSYCHOLOGY Wadlington.

Truly Shocking In Milgram's first set of experiments,

65 percent (26 of 40) of experiment participants administered the experiment's final 450-volt shock, though many were very uncomfortable doing so At some point, every participant

paused and questioned the experiment.

However, no participant completly refused to administer shocks before 300-volts.

Page 17: MILGRAM’S EXPERIMENT A STUDY IN OBEDIENCE AP PSYCHOLOGY Wadlington AP PSYCHOLOGY Wadlington.

Perception vs. Reality During a conference, before to reveal

what the participants did, Milgram asked how they would have reacted in such a situation.

Unanimously they replied that they would have stopped despite of the experimenter's orders at less than 300V.

I observed a mature and initially poised businessman enter the laboratory smiling and confident. Within 20 minutes he was reduced to a twitching, stuttering wreck, who was rapidly approaching nervous collapse. He constantly pulled on his ear lobe and twisted his hands. At one point he pushed his fist into his forehead and muttered “Oh God, lets stop it.” And yet he continued to respond to every word of the experimenter, and obeyed to the end.”

I observed a mature and initially poised businessman enter the laboratory smiling and confident. Within 20 minutes he was reduced to a twitching, stuttering wreck, who was rapidly approaching nervous collapse. He constantly pulled on his ear lobe and twisted his hands. At one point he pushed his fist into his forehead and muttered “Oh God, lets stop it.” And yet he continued to respond to every word of the experimenter, and obeyed to the end.”

Page 18: MILGRAM’S EXPERIMENT A STUDY IN OBEDIENCE AP PSYCHOLOGY Wadlington AP PSYCHOLOGY Wadlington.

Interpretations

By modern standards, Milgram’s study was unethical. Nonetheless, it still remains a landmark experiment in psychology.

From this experiment, Milgram developed two critical theories:

Page 19: MILGRAM’S EXPERIMENT A STUDY IN OBEDIENCE AP PSYCHOLOGY Wadlington AP PSYCHOLOGY Wadlington.

Theory of Conformism: A subject who has neither ability nor expertise to make decisions, especially in a crisis, will leave decision making to the group and its hierarchy. The group is the person's behavioral model.

Agentic State Theory: The essence of obedience consists in the fact that a person comes to view himself as the instrument for carrying out another person's wishes, and he therefore no longer sees himself as responsible for his actions.