MIIS Reorganization Next Steps Follow Up from the Retreats March 16, 2009.
-
date post
20-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of MIIS Reorganization Next Steps Follow Up from the Retreats March 16, 2009.
2
Table of Contents
• Achieving ‘One MIIS’ (Takeaways from the Retreats)
• Desired Outcomes: Academic Year 2009-10
• Planning Process and Structure
• Timeline and Milestones
3
• The retreats of last month began a process that will carry us through a successful reorganization, enabling MIIS to achieve its goals of excellence in learning, teaching and professional development
• In seeking to create a whole that is truly greater than the sum of the parts, we must first strengthen the parts
• The task forces and working groups described in the following pages are charged with:
– Ensuring rigor, focus and relevance in our academic programs
– Realizing the promise of Monterey Way 2.0
– Weaving a strong fabric of connections among programs, departments and schools
– Achieving synergies and efficiencies that will enable all of us to work smarter
– Being the solution
MIIS Reorganization: Looking Ahead
5
GSIPM
• Academic excellence permeates the entire value chain of MIIS, from selectivity in student admissions and faculty recruitment, to enhanced Monterey Way 2.0 teaching and learning, to adaptability of graduates to future job markets
• Curriculum development must focus on relevance to global problems and solutions, practical perspectives, and marketable skills, rather than traditional teaching and classroom activities
• Strong core program elements are to serve as the basis for cross-disciplinary learning and creative programming, and are conceived in such a way that we prevent the formation of new silos
• Curriculum and program development require an organizational infrastructure (structure, process, and culture) that supports greater capacity for innovation and collaboration
GSIPM and GSTILE must have a seamless relationship withAdvising, Career & Student Services for MIIS to achieve success
Achieving ‘One MIIS’
6
GSTILE
• Members of the MIIS community want to learn more about one another
• Faculty want to collaborate across our curricula on projects such as interdisciplinary courses; joint degrees/certificates in teaching T&I, and educational policy; Monterey Model courses; enhanced language offerings; and exploration of PhD possibilities
• Faculty can share expertise across our curricula in improved language assessment practices, training of teachers, and enhanced non-degree program offerings
• Our curricula must help students meet professional objectives that are market driven
• MIIS students gain invaluable professional experience by interacting and working with the local community
Achieving ‘One MIIS’
GSIPM and GSTILE must have a seamless relationship withAdvising, Career & Student Services for MIIS to achieve success
7
Advising, Career and Student Services
• Advising, Career and Student Services (ACSS) must provide a seamless advising experience from prospective students to alumni with ‘high-touch’ communications
• Students can access expanded job and career resources, including the experiences and networks of our MIIS alumni and the broader Middlebury network
• Faculty advising and mentoring roles are enhanced while relationships among faculty, students, and professional advising staff are transparent and effective
• Students can both feel support and exercise individual choice and responsibility
• MIIS should maintain and build upon current community building efforts
• Success also means embedding inter-disciplinary relationships in programs
The schools must communicate and articulate effectively and consistently with ACSS
Achieving ‘One MIIS’
8
Running ‘One MIIS’
• Well-designed infrastructure (human and technological) contributes to clear and efficient work processes
• Efficient, transparent work processes and effective communication save time that can be devoted to strategic thinking and innovation
• Elegant and consistent assessment methodologies inform data driven decision-making
• A positive, appreciative community generates confidence and pride in MIIS and inspires people to want to give, and give back
Achieving ‘One MIIS’
10
GSIPM
Desired Outcomes: Academic Year 2009-10
• Several curriculum and program innovations that demonstrate Monterey Way 2.0 learning and positive impact on student career development, student and faculty recruitment, and institutional advancement
• A transparent and efficient decision system that is capable of allocating limited resources to the best ideas for course, curriculum and program changes
• An organizational system in place that facilitates a cultural change from excellence in classroom teaching to excellence in student-centered learning
• Smooth transition from the current structure to ensure promises made to students and alumni are delivered, particularly vis-à-vis ACSS
11
• Increased awareness of colleagues’ interests, enthusiasms, and areas of expertise
• Several well-articulated proposals that link curricula across programs
• Improved language assessment practices
• Curriculum design that implements teacher training across programs
• Formal assessment and optimization plans for all non-degree programs
• Well-researched understanding of market forces that impact program planning and development for meaningful student experiences and employment
• Collaborative interactions and information sharing with ACSS
GSTILE
Desired Outcomes: Academic Year 2009-10
12
• Implementation of Advising 2.0: advising blogs, podcasts, and e-file for each student
• Advising syllabus with degree/track specific outcomes
• Centralized career resources and data
• Staff of cross-trained advising generalists and specialists
• Ability for students to make online advising appointments
• Peer to Peer Mentoring Program
• Alumni Mentoring Program
Desired Outcomes: Academic Year 2009-10
Advising, Career and Student Services
13
• Side-by-Side Analysis and Recommendations: current practices; required changes for Fall 2009; changes for June 2010; and allocation of roles and responsibilities
Desired Outcomes: Academic Year 2009-10
Running ‘One MIIS’
Functions
Admissions: recruiting strategy, publications, web presence, criteria, forms, process, articulation with advising/schools, financial aid, visit days
Advising: testing, academic advising, career advising, career information/resources, employer relations
Community Building: new student orientation, international student orientation, staff advisory team, innovation process
Student Information Systems: automation of registration, grading, transcripts
Classes: course scheduling, testing, pre-registration, registration, drop/add process
Graduation: degree audits, diplomas
14
Desired Outcomes: Academic Year 2009-10
Running ‘One MIIS’ (cont’d)
Functions (cont’d)
Faculty: recruitment and hiring, faculty development, faculty evaluation, reviews and promotions
Faculty Governance: Faculty Senate, FEC, APSIC, representation, rights and responsibilities
Curriculum: program reviews (internal/external), outcomes-based assessment, market-aware planning
Resources: teaching resource allocation, budget process
Maintenance of Accreditation: AACSB, NEASC
Advancement: fundraising priorities
Technology: support for MW 2.0 teaching/learning; advising and communications infrastructure; web presence for marketing and community building
• Side-by-Side Analysis and Recommendations: current practices; required changes for Fall 2009; changes for June 2010; and allocation of roles and responsibilities
16
Planning Process and Structure
1. Council of Program Chairs for GSIPM, chaired by Dean-designate Yuwei Shi; its work will involve broad consultation with all stakeholders in the curriculum development process
2. Council of Program Chairs for GSTILE, chaired by Dean-designate Renee Jourdenais; Dean Jourdenais will issue a call for curricular ideas, and faculty and staff will be invited to volunteer for smaller ides-development sub-groups
3. Task Force for Advising, Career and Student Services, appointed and chaired by Dean-designate Tate Miller, with representation from students, faculty and staff, and input sought from the entire community via a public wiki
4. A Reorganization Working Group of volunteers, open to all areas of the community and chaired by Amy McGill, Executive Director for Planning and Special Projects, to analyze and make recommendations on organizational and infrastructural issues regarding the reorganization to two schools, and in the transition to full integration with Middlebury in 2010
Four groups will be formed to guide the process
Amy Sands, MIIS Provost, will have oversight responsibilities over reorganization activities
17
Planning Process and Structure
1. Form the Council of Program Chairs as the primary entity responsible for curriculum and program planning and change
2. Create liaisons with Advising (participating in the Advising Task Force) and Faculty Senate to collaborate on curriculum, program and organizational changes
• Develop draft guidelines for innovative proposals for new courses, curricula and programs
• Finalize the guidelines through discussions among all stakeholders within MIIS
• Implement, review and modify the guidelines by end of Academic Year 2009-10
GSIPM
18
Planning Process and Structure
1. Initiate community building activities (ALL ideas welcome)
2. Program Chairs identify/seek one or two faculty/staff who would be interested in participating in each of the above-mentioned endeavors (themselves included)
• Small teams explore possibilities, reporting back to colleagues and Program Chairs for feedback during monthly meetings
• Program Chairs and Dean examine feasibility of endeavors
• Implement ideas
• Form new groups as new ideas are generated… repeat process
GSTILE
19
Planning Process and Structure
1. Establish 8-12 person Task Force of faculty, students, and staff– Meet every two weeks to develop one year advising plan based upon retreat
takeaways, desired outcomes and goals
2. Task Force will use advising planning wiki (already in place) for Institute-wide input and formally liaise with Program Chairs, Provost, Student Council and others
3. Task force hands off final approved plan for implementation
4. Dean of Advising, Career and Student Services posts monthly progress reports on advising blog, and reports to Task Force and Provost
5. Task Force monitors, evaluates and adjusts plan for one year
Advising, Career and Student Services
20
Planning Process and Structure
1. Issue call for volunteers to establish working group for infrastructure issues: ideally includes representation from admissions, registrar’s office, business office, advancement, HR, IT, TLC, and innovations incubator, plus interested faculty and students
2. Assign appropriate functions to the working group to achieve side-by-side analysis and develop reorganization implementation plan (see next slide)
• Develop focused sub-groups as appropriate
3. Assign appropriate functions to other MIIS groups: Faculty Senate and faculty committees; Advising Task Force; GSIPM and GSTILE Councils of Program Chairs (see next slide)
4. Conduct analysis in consultation with other groups, as required
5. Each group issues a report and recommendations to academic leadership by August 15, 2009
Running ‘One MIIS’
21
Planning Process and Structure
Running ‘One MIIS’ (cont’d)
Functions Groups responsible for analysis
Admissions Working group
Advising Advising Task Force
Community Building Advising Task Force
Student Information Systems Working group
Classes Working group
Graduation Working group
Faculty Faculty Senate, committees
Faculty Governance Faculty Senate, committees
Curriculum GSIPM and GSTILE Councils of Program Chairs
Resources Working group
Maintenance of Accreditation Working group
Advancement Working group
Technology Working group
23
Timeline and Milestones
• Establishment of the Council of Program Chairs (and liaisons)
• Draft of guidelines for curricula change available for discussion
• Finalization of the guidelines
• Introduction of new course, curriculum or program
• Review of new offerings and the guidelines
GSIPM
Apr 2009
Jul 2009
Sep 2009
Oct 2009
Feb – May 2010
24
Timeline and Milestones
• “Coffee with Colleagues”*
• Shared meetings
• Identification/self-selection of faculty and staff groups
• Feasibility studies
• Implementation
GSTILE
Starting Now
Starting Now
Aug 2009
Fall 2009/Spring 2010
Fall 2009/Spring 2010
As ideas are ready
25
Timeline and Milestones
• Advising blog goes live
• Grand Opening: Center for Advising & Career Services
• One year plan completed
• Individual advising E-file Advising syllabus for each degree Ten additional career advising podcasts
• Non-credit five week career course for all new students + advising portal on new MIIS website
• Peer to Peer Advising and Mentoring Program
• Institute-wide career fair
Advising, Career and Student Services
Apr 15, 2009
May 1, 2009
May 15, 2009
Aug 15, 2009
Sep 1, 2009
Feb 1, 2010
Mar 31, 2010
26
Timeline and Milestones
• Working group formed
• Issues assigned to working group, Advising Task force, Faculty senate and committees, and Councils of program chairs for analysis and recommendations
• Analysis and recommendations completed
Running ‘One MIIS’
April 1, 2009
April 1, 2009
August 15, 2009