Microtremor Survey
-
Upload
shella-marie-nartatez-niro -
Category
Documents
-
view
81 -
download
6
description
Transcript of Microtremor Survey
I. INTRODUCTION
This fieldwork was done last November 11, 2012, Sunday at Greenwoods Executive Village,
Pinagbuhatan, Pasig City. Two (2) students under the tutelage of Dr. Arturo S. Daag joined a group
of scientist from PHIVOLCS in conducting Refraction microtremor survey at two (2) designated
areas inside the village.
Refraction microtremor (ReMi) is a surface-performed geophysical survey developed by
Dr. John Louie (and others) based on previously existing principles of evaluating surface waves and
in particular Rayleigh waves. The refraction microtremor technology was developed at the
University of Nevada and is owned by the State of Nevada. Optim of Reno, Nevada has the exclusive
license to develop the technology, and SeisOpt® ReMi™ has been available commercially from
Optim since 2004. Since Rayleigh waves are dispersive, the propagating waves are measured along
a linear seismic array and evaluated relative to wave frequency and slowness (or the inverse of the
velocity). Due to the dispersive characteristics of higher frequency waves travelling through the
more shallow conditions and lower frequency waves passing through deeper materials, a 1-D sub-
surface profile can be generated based on the velocity with depth.
ReMi is a new, proven seismic method for measuring in-situ shear-wave (S-wave) velocity
profiles. It is economic both in terms of cost and time. Testing is performed at the surface using the
same conventional seismograph and vertical P-wave geophones used for refraction studies. The
seismic source consists of ambient seismic "noise", or microtremors, which are constantly being
generated by cultural and natural noise. Because conventional seismic equipment is used to record
data, and ambient noise is used as a seismic source, the ReMi method is less costly, faster and more
convenient than borehole methods and other surface seismic methods, such as SASW and MASW
used to determine shear-wave profiles. Depending on the material properties of the subsurface,
ReMi can determine shear wave velocities down to a minimum of 40 meters (130 feet) and a
maximum of 100 meters (300 feet) depth.
ReMi can be used to obtain Vs profiles for: Earthquake site response, Liquefaction analysis,
Soil compaction control, Mapping the subsurface and estimating the strength of subsurface
materials, Finding buried cultural features, such as dumps and piers and Offshore surveys to
determine depth to bedrock for harbor and pier extensions.
II. OBJECTIVE
The main objective of this field work is to familiarize ourselves with the equipments and
proper technique in conducting a Refraction microtremor (ReMi) survey and correlate the resulting
data with another data using different geophysical survey.
III. LOCATION and ACCESSIBILITY
Greenwoods Executive Village, Pinagbuhatan, Pasig City is located 25 km east of Manila,
and can be easily access by public and private vehicles. A typical commute between Manila
and the village will take between 30 minutes to one hour depending upon traffic
conditions. It is bordered on the west by Quezon City and Mandaluyong City; to the north
by Marikina City; to the south by Makati City,Pateros, and Taguig City; and to the east by Antipolo
City, the municipality of Cainta and Taytay in the province of Rizal.
Two sites at Greenwood Executive Village were chosen for the survey. The first survey was
staged in an open field of concrete road with geographical coordinates of N14º54’93.9” and
E121º11’20.7”, and the second was inside the football field beside the village club house. The whole
area was a rice field before being converted to a first class residential village. Most of the areas that
are not yet develop are swampy with thriving water lilies and live fish particularly the local variant
of tilapia.
IV. EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS
Geophones with 24 sensors
Seismograph (digitizer) Laptop (displays the data)
Battery (power source) Y-cables (connects the geophones to
the digitizer)
Refraction Cable 200 m Seismic source (hammer)
Metered tape (for measuring the required distance of each geophones)
Note: Note: Amplitude or frequency-response calibration of geophones is not needed - as
with refraction, ReMi uses only the phase information in the recorded wave field.
V. PROCEDURE AND METHODOLOGY
Setting up the array: Put the cable across your site in a line 200 m (600 ft) long, with about
8 m (25 ft) spacing between phones.
a.) You need to locate a reasonably straight stretch of flat ground at your site at least 200
meters long. Center it on your foundation or borehole location if possible.
b.) The absolute minimum array length needed for a 15%-accuracy ReMi is 100 meters.
c.) Avoid known underground cavities 3 meters or more in diameter - pass beside but not
over them.
d.) Avoid concrete slabs; thin pavements are OK as long as you are able to set the
geophones on them.
e.) For ease of deployment, avoid water more than 6 inches deep.
f.) An easy urban layout is to run the array along the sidewalk, with the geophones planted
into the parking strip or cracks in pavements. If the seismic cable must cross a street or
drive ways that cannot be blocked during the survey, put it between 2x4s nailed to the
pavement. Protect any geophones installed in a street with a traffic cone, or note any
channels that cannot be installed.
g.) A ReMi array can work extending into the ground floor of a building.
h.) For ReMi a deviation in the line of 5%, or 10 m from a 200-m-long line, will not affect the
stated 15% velocity accuracy of the method.
i.) This accuracy applies to elevations as well - in fact the line can have a constant
inclination that can safely be ignored, as long as geophone elevations do not deviate more
than 10 m from the incline.
j.) Simply chain out the geophone locations with a tape measure.
k.) Survey the geophone locations to 1-meter accuracy if the array is more than 10 meters
out of line, or 10 meters off constant incline. Include the survey data with the seismic
records if this is the case.
Installing the Array:
a.) Unreel your geophone cable along the array line, setting takeouts at the chained, marked
geophone locations.
b.) The geophones can be as much as 15 degrees off vertical without compromising ReMi
data quality. Visual inspection of verticality is thus adequate.
c.) Attach your multichannel seismograph and test for electrical continuity, and signal from
all geophones.
Recording Data: Take 3 to 10 records of background noise, 20-60 seconds long each.
a.) Set the record to have 24 channels (if your recorder allows more).
b.) Set a time sample interval of 2 milliseconds (ms) or longer, up to10 ms.
c.) Set each record to have a time duration of 20-30 seconds. 4 seconds is the absolute
minimum. Records longer than 30 seconds can be difficult to translate between formats -
configure each recorded trace to have no more than 16,000 samples to avoid such problems
(8-sec record at 0.5 ms sampling; 32-sec record at 2 ms sampling; or 160-sec record at 10
ms sampling).
d.) Turn off any filtering before digitizing or plotting. If the recorder does not allow this, set
the lowest possible low-cut filter frequency (hopefully 4 Hz or less) and a high-cut
frequency equal to half the sampling frequency (e.g.: with 2 ms samples, sampling frequency
is 500 Hz, so a high-cut filter at 250 Hz is OK as a reasonable anti-aliasing filter).
e.) Record 3 to 10 records, triggered manually. You may want to wait for the passage of a
good noise source like a train, heavy trucks, or low-flying jet.
f.) Do not stack records in the seismograph's memory. Clear the stack memory before
triggering each record.
g.) Save each record separately to the seismograph's hard disk, or floppy
h.) Transfer records to a laptop on-site, for easy data transmission later.
i.) If the site is quiet, activate some sort of source during each record. Drive up and down
the geophone line in a truck. Run up and down the line. Pick up and drop 50-lb rocks. No
timing or locating of the source is needed
A. Site No 1. Open field along the concrete road
1. The geophones are placed in an array consisting of 24 geophones at an interval of 2 m
each. (Photo 1)
Photo 1
2. We device a stand to make sure that the geophones tip are directly pointed towards the
ground. (Photo 2)
Photo 2
3. Passive seismic source was used in this particular survey since the survey area is not in
a soft soil. (Photo 3)
Photo 3
B. Site No. 2. Football Field.
1. The geophones are placed in an array consisting of 24 geophones at an interval of 2.5 m
each. (Photo 4 & 5)
Photo 4
Photo 5
4. Since the survey is on a soft ground we utilize a seismic source, which is a hammer to
generate seismic waves. (Photo 6)
Photo 6
VI. RESULTS AND INTERPRETATION
A. Site No 1. Open field along the concrete road
Velocity model is on the right 1st column is the depth (in meters), 2nd column is the density,
and the 3rd column is the shear wave velocity (in meters/sec). At lower bottom right is the IBC site
class E, which is not surprising considering that the surveyed area is a former rice field. The lower
bottom figure is the graph of fit dots based on the velocity model on the right. The rms (~5) must be
less than 10, to consider the velocity model to be acceptable. The upper left figure is the surface
wave dispersions, the boxes are the picks which are reflected on the graph.
Note the decrease in velocity value below 4.15 m depth.
Here are the velocity values gathered from site 1:
Depth (m) Shear wave velocity, Vs (m/sec)
0.0 116.11
1.051 116.11
1.892 135.683
5.571 168.47
17.868 135.41
Velocity model from ReMi Comparison of velocity model with SPT-N of Spectrometer
B. Site No. 2. Football Field.
Here are the velocity values gathered from site 2.
Depth (m) Shear wave velocity, Vs (m/sec)
0.0 122.559
5.648 170.567
10.465 170.567
15.781 233.852
Velocity model from ReMi Comparison of velocity model with SPT-N of Spectrometer
In the comparison of velocity model with SPT-N of the spectrometer, the formula that I
used is Vs = 89.8*N^(0.341). (Ref: Imai, T. and Yoshimura, Y. (1975). The relation of
mechanical properties of soils to P and S-wave velocities for ground in Japan, Technical Note, OYO
Corporation.) This is also the same formula that Metro Manila Earthquake Impact Reduction Study
(MMEIRS) used in their reports.
In the MMEIRS report of Vs value of Taguig, which is close to Cainta, ranges from 120-250
m/s and is very consistent with our measurements. The results of the Spectrometer and ReMi
methods suggest that a soft soil layer underlies the village. The spectrometer method gives
a higher resolution of the shallower rock layer while the ReMi provide estimates of the Vs at deeper
depths. ReMi modelling suggested a site class type E (soft soil profile) following the 2003
International Building Code Site Class Definitions.
The difference in measured shear wave velocity results between these methods is in the
order of 10 to 20 per cent.
VII. CONCLUSION
The ReMi method offers significant advantages. In contrast to borehole measurements ReMi
tests a much larger volume of the subsurface. The results represent the average shear wave velocity
over distances as far as 200 meters (600 feet). Because ReMi is non-invasive and non-destructive,
and uses only ambient noise as a seismic source, no permits are required for its use. ReMi seismic
lines can be deployed within road medians, at active construction sites, or along highways, without
having to disturb work or traffic flow. Unlike other seismic methods for determining shear wave
velocity, ReMi will use these ongoing activities as seismic sources. There is no need to close a street
or shut down work for the purpose of data acquisition. And a ReMi survey usually takes less than
two hours, from setup through breakdown. Greater depth of investigation compared to borehole
and surface methods.
Surface waves are naturally considered to be the dominant component of the microtremors,
over body waves. The ReMi method is suitable for the estimation of subsurface structure, such as
required by the field of earthquake engineering.
IX. REFERENCES Comparative Study of the Refraction Microtremor (ReMi) Method: Using Seismic
noise and standard P-wave refraction equipment for deriving 1-D S-wave profiles.
Satish Pullammanappallil and Bill Honjas, Optim LLC, Reno, Nevada, USA. .
PHIVOLCS. Winchelle Ian Sevilla