Microsoft Outlook - Memo Style€¦ · 1 Emma Goddard From: food hub Sent: 29 March 2018 09:42 To:...

1

Emma Goddard

From: food hub [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 29 March 2018 09:45 To: Claire Curtis Cc: Poole, Liz ; Tracy Lincoln Subject: RE: Food Enterprise Park

Good morning Clare

I refer to our email exchange below. For your information, please find attached a copy of the email that I have just sent to Liz Poole at Norfolk County Council. Liz, perhaps I could ask you to cc Claire to your reply please?

Many thanks

Stephen

Stephen Scowen Economic Development Manager (Partnerships and Growth) Broadland District Council Tel: 01603 430125

www.broadland.gov.uk<http://www.broadland.gov.uk/> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> For all your business training needs go to - www.broadland.gov.uk/training<http://www.broadland.gov.uk/training> Visiting the district? Go to - www.visitbroadland.co.uk<http://www.visitbroadland.co.uk/>

1

Emma Goddard

From: food hub <[email protected]>Sent: 29 March 2018 09:42To: 'Poole, Liz'Cc: Martin ThirkettleSubject: 20180471: Land at Honingham, Greater Norwich Food Enterpise Zone LDO siteAttachments: 141222_CL-1010_P1.pdf; 141222_CL-1011_P1.pdf; 141222_CL-1012_P1.pdf; 141222_CL-1013

_P1.pdf

Good morning Liz I refer to the condition set out at paragraph 2.20 of the Greater Norwich Food Enterprise Zone LDO ref 20170052 which states: Prior to the commencement of development, a scheme of works shall be submitted and agreed in writing with the Local Planning Authority in consultation with the Highway Authority and, where appropriate, Highways England. The scheme of works shall include the following elements, unless otherwise agreed in writing with the local planning authority, and identify triggers for the implementation of each component: • Realignment/change of priority at the junction of Dereham Road/Church Lane • A right turn lane from Dereham Road into Church Lane • A scheme of widening improvements to Church Lane • Vehicular access to the LDO site either off Church Lane/Red Barn Lane or directly from the A47. • Enhanced footway and cycle facilities to connect with Dereham Road • The closure of Blind Lane to vehicular traffic As required by the condition, please find attached details of improvements to Church Lane/Red Barn lane in the form of a passing bay arrangement and a vehicular access to the LDO site off Church Lane/Red Barn Lane. In terms of implementation, it is proposed that these improvements occur prior to the first occupation on the LDO site. The proposed arrangement is intended to be temporary until such time that the A47 RIS scheme is delivered in 2021 which will facilitate a direct means of access to the LDO site from the A47 that avoids the use of Church Lane. Once the details of this scheme are known, the remaining details required by the condition set out at paragraph 2.20 will be confirmed. I should be pleased if you would provide me with an opinion as to whether you consider these details meet with the terms of the condition? For information the details are available to view on our website here https://secure.broadland.gov.uk/MVM/Online/dms/DocumentViewer.aspx?PK=728116&SearchType=Planning%20Application Many thanks Stephen

Stephen Scowen

Economic Development Manager (Partnerships and Growth)

Broadland District Council

Tel: 01603 430125

www.broadland.gov.uk

[email protected]

For all your business training needs go to ‐ www.broadland.gov.uk/training

2

Visiting the district? Go to ‐ www.visitbroadland.co.uk

From: Gavin Ackland [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 15 March 2018 11:41 To: [email protected] Cc: Ian Alston; Mark Baxter; Stephen Scowen; James; Luke Fairall Subject: Norfolk Food Hub ‐ Church Lane passing bays Easton S278 Good morning Liz, Further to recent discussions and the meeting on site I am pleased to attached detailed design drawings in respect of the proposed S278 works. These works are to provide passing bays along Church Lane in accordance with condition 2.20 of the LDO for the Norfolk Food Hub and are to be implemented prior to first occupation. Please could you commence the necessary technical checks and send me details of any payments required and documents that need to be completed. If you have any queries please feel free to make contact. Kind regards Gavin Ackland BEng(Hons) MCIHT Principal Civil Engineer Rossi Long Consulting Ltd 16 Meridian Way, Norwich, NR7 0TA T 01603 706420 (706447 DL) F 01603 706421 E [email protected] www.rossilong.co.uk

Please consider the environment and only print this email if necessary.

4

7

.5

0

47.2

5

47.3

0

47.35

4

7

.4

0

4

7

.4

5

4

7

.

1

0

4

7

.

1

5

4

7

.

2

0

5

0

6

0

7

0

8

0

9

0

(47.10)

(47.23)

(47.60)

P

A

S

S

I

N

G

B

A

Y

1

PROPOSED

CARRIAGEWAY

EDGE

EXISTING

CARRIAGEWAY

EDGE

EXISTING

CARRIAGEWAY

EDGE

NEW PASSING BAY CREATED

TO GIVE A MIN 6.5m OVERALL

CARRIAGEWAY WIDTH

C

H

U

R

C

H

L

A

N

E

PROPOSED PASSING

BAY DRAINAGE

SOAKAWAY SA-1

VERGE TO GRADED TO

CHANNEL WATER FROM

END OF PASSING BAY

EXISTING CARRIAGEWAY TO

BE RESURFACED FOR FIRST

1m IN FROM EDGE

SA-1

TOP 46.550 | BOT 46.150

A

S

S

U

M

E

D

H

I

G

H

W

A

Y

B

O

U

N

D

A

R

Y

A

S

S

U

M

E

D

H

I

G

H

W

A

Y

B

O

U

N

D

A

R

Y

2

0

m

5

m

5

m

5

2

.

7

VERGE BANKED ALONG

EDGE OF PASSING BAY

4

4

.0

0

43.85

4

3

.9

0

4

3

.9

5

4

4

.

0

0

4

3

.

8

5

4

3

.

9

0

4

3

.

9

5

4

4

.

0

5

4

4

.1

0

4

4

.

1

5

4

4

.

2

0

3

8

0

3

9

0

4

0

0

4

1

0

4

2

0

(43.82)

(43.75)

(44.08)

P

A

S

S

I

N

G

B

A

Y

2

C

H

U

R

C

H

L

A

N

E

VERGE TO GRADED TO

CHANNEL WATER FROM

END OF PASSING BAY

PROPOSED

CARRIAGEWAY

EDGE

EXISTING

CARRIAGEWAY

EDGE



1m IN FROM EDGE



CARRIAGEWAY WIDTH

SA-2

TOP 43.200 | BOT 42.800

PROPOSED PASSING

BAY DRAINAGE

SOAKAWAY SA-2

A

S

S

U

M

E

D

H

I

G

H

W

A

Y

B

O

U

N

D

A

R

Y

A

S

S

U

M

E

D

H

I

G

H

W

A

Y

B

O

U

N

D

A

R

Y

STN

11

MAINTAIN EXISTING

FIELD ACCESS

2

0

m

5

m

5

m

3

8

2

.

5

BANKED VERGE

43.10

4

3

.1

5

4

3

.2

0

4

3

.2

5

4

3

.3

0

4

3

.3

5

4

3

.4

0

4

3

.4

5

4

3

.

0

0

4

2

.

9

5

43.50

43.55

43.60

4

6

0

4

7

0

4

8

0

4

9

0

5

0

0

(43.07)

(42.95)

(43.51)

P

A

S

S

I

N

G

B

A

Y

3

C

H

U

R

C

H

L

A

N

E

VERGE TO GRADED TO

CHANNEL WATER FROM

END OF PASSING BAY

PROPOSED

CARRIAGEWAY

EDGE

EXISTING

CARRIAGEWAY

EDGE

EXISTING

CARRIAGEWAY

EDGE



1m IN FROM EDGE



CARRIAGEWAY WIDTH

SA-3

TOP 42.400 | BOT 42.000

PROPOSED PASSING

BAY DRAINAGE

SOAKAWAY SA-3

A

S

S

U

M

E

D

H

I

G

H

W

A

Y

B

O

U

N

D

A

R

Y

A

S

S

U

M

E

D

H

I

G

H

W

A

Y

B

O

U

N

D

A

R

Y

2

0

m

5

m

5

m

BANKED VERGE

4

2

.

0

0

4

2

.

0

5

4

2

.

1

0

4

1

.

8

5

4

1

.

9

0

4

1

.

9

5

4

2

.

0

0

4

2

.

0

5

4

2

.

1

0

4

2

.

1

5

6

3

0

6

4

0

6

5

0

6

6

0

(42.00)

(42.17)

P

A

S

S

I

N

G

B

A

Y

4

C

H

U

R

C

H

L

A

N

E

PROPOSED

CARRIAGEWAY

EDGE

EXISTING

CARRIAGEWAY

EDGE

EXISTING

CARRIAGEWAY

EDGE



1m IN FROM EDGE

PASSING BAY TO DRAIN

FROM EDGE ON TO

EXISTING VERGE



CARRIAGEWAY WIDTH

A

S

S

U

M

E

D

H

I

G

H

W

A

Y

B

O

U

N

D

A

R

Y

A

S

S

U

M

E

D

H

I

G

H

W

A

Y

B

O

U

N

D

A

R

Y

2

0

m

5

m

5

m

6

2

7

VERGE FALLS AWAY FROM

PASSING BAY EDGE

8

1

0

8

2

0

8

3

0

8

4

0

850

860

870

B

C

A

D

E

F

S

P

7

5

REMOVE EXISTING GULLY AND

INSTALL NEW AT RE-ALIGNED

KERB. RE-CONNECT TO EXISTING

DRAINAGE SYSTEM

MOVE EXISTING 30mph SIGN AND

POST TO NEW POSITION BEHIND

RE-ALIGNED KERB

S

P

7

5

S

P

7

5

PROPOSED NEW

SPLAY KERB LINE

BETWEEN 'A' AND 'B'

EXISTING SPLAY KERBS

TO BE TAKEN OUT

BETWEEN 'B' AND 'C'

MOVE EXISTING STREET LIGHT

COLUMN TO NEW POSITION BEHIND

RE-ALIGNED KERB TO THE APPROVAL

OF NCC STREET LIGHTING ENGINEER

EXISTING

CARRIAGEWAY

EDGE

EXISTING ROAD CENTRELINES TO

BE REMOVED BETWEEN 'D' AND 'E'

AND NEW LINES PAINTED ON

CENTRELINE BETWEEN 'E' AND 'F'

PAINT NEW LANE EDGE MARKINGS

TO CREATE 6.5m CARRIAGEWAY

WIDTH THROUGH BEND. REMOVE

EXISTING LANE EDGE MARKINGS

AND REPAINT ALL OTHER EXISTING

MARKINGS AT BEND

6

.

5

m

C

H

U

R

C

H

L

A

N

E

A

S

S

U

M

E

D

H

IG

H

W

A

Y

B

O

U

N

D

A

R

Y

A

S

S

U

M

E

D

H

I

G

H

W

A

Y

B

O

U

N

D

A

R

Y

SLO

W

48 .0 00

48 .000

47.500

48.50048.500

00

5

0

1

0

0

1

5

0

2

0

0

2

5

0

3

0

0

3

5

0

4

0

0

4

5

0

5

0

0

5

5

0

6

0

0

6

5

0

7

0

0

7

5

0

8

0

0

850

900

2

.

4

x

2

1

5

m

V

I

S

I

B

I

L

I

T

Y

S

P

L

A

Y

2.4x215m

V

IS

IB

ILIT

Y S

PLA

Y

VISIBILITY

ENVELOPE

HATCHED AREA INDICATES AREA OF

FIELD TO BE SET ASIDE FOR VISIBILITY

SPLAY. NO CROPS, PLANTING OR

OBSTRUCTION WITHIN THIS ZONE

7 NR EXISTING

TREES TO BE

RETAINED

B

O

U

N

D

A

R

Y

B

E

TW

E

E

N

S

O

U

TH

N

O

R

FO

LK

A

N

D

B

R

O

A

D

LA

N

D

A

R

E

A

S

LAND OUTSIDE OF

CLIENT CONTROL

C

H

U

R

C

H

L

A

N

E

D

E

R

E

H

A

M

R

O

A

D

HIGH VOLTAGE

OVERHEAD

POWER LINES

CHURCH

(47.10)

LEGEND

EXISTING LEVEL (m)

EXISTING GROUND CONTOUR (m)

(INDICATIVE ONLY)

PROPOSED FINISHED GROUND

CONTOUR (m) (INDICATIVE ONLY)

45° SPLAYED KERB

(100mm AND 125mm FACE)

ROAD EDGE NOT KERBED

PROPOSED SOAKAWAY FOR PASSING BAY

PROPOSED ROAD GULLY

'TIE-IN' WITH EXISTING CARRIAGEWAY EDGE

SURVEY CONTROL STATION

4

3

.

0

0

SA

STN

PRELIMINARY DRAWING:THIS DRAWING IS FOR PRELIMINARY PURPOSES ONLYAND MUST NOT BE READ AS A CONSTRUCTION ISSUE.IT INDICATES DESIGN INTENT ONLY AND IS SUBJECT TOAMENDMENT DURING FINAL DESIGN DEVELOPMENT.

FIRST ISSUE FOR APPROVAL/COMMENT 12/03/18P1 GMA

SAFETY, HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION BOX

NOTES: THIS DRAWING IS TO BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE RISK

REGISTER PRODUCED FOR INCLUSION IN THE HEALTH AND SAFETY

PLAN. THE HAZARDS NOTED ARE IN ADDITION TO THE NORMAL

HAZARDS AND RISKS FACED BY A COMPETENT CONTRACTOR WHEN

DEALING WITH THE TYPE OF WORKS DETAILED ON THIS DRAWING.

CONSTRUCTION RISKS:

MAINTENANCE/CLEANING RISKS:

DEMOLITION RISKS:

!

TITLE

STAGE:-

DRAWN AUTHORISED DATE

PROJECT NO. DRAWING NO. REV

CLIENT

PROJECT

REV DESCRIPTION DATE BY AUTH

16 Meridian Way, Norwich, Norfolk, NR7 0TA

T: 01603 706 420 F: 01603 706 421 www.rossilong.co.uk

SCALE AT A1

P1

PRELIMINARY

141222 CL-1010

IAN ALSTON

HONINGHAM THORPE FARMS

NORFOLK FOOD HUB

CHURCH LANE, EASTON

GENERAL ARRANGEMENT OF

PROPOSED S278 WORKS ON

CHURCH LANE

GMA 12/03/18 1:2500; 1:200

N

O

N

L

Y

IN

D

IC

A

T

IV

E

GENERAL NOTES

1) THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE

SCOPE OF ROSSI LONG CONSULTING'S APPOINTMENT WITH ITS CLIENT

AND IS SUBJECT TO THE TERMS OF THAT APPOINTMENT. ROSSI LONG

CONSULTING ACCEPTS NO LIABILITY FOR ANY USE OF THIS DOCUMENT

OTHER THAN BY ITS CLIENT AND ONLY FOR THE PURPOSES FOR WHICH

IT WAS PREPARED AND PROVIDED. ONLY WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL

BE USED.

2) THIS DRAWING IS TO BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH ALL RELEVANT

ENGINEER'S DRAWINGS AND DETAILS, THE SPECIFICATION FOR THE

WORKS, THE RELEVANT ARCHITECT'S DRAWINGS AND ANY OTHER

SPECIALIST'S DRAWINGS.

3) THIS DRAWING IS BASED ON TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY CARRIED OUT BY

TOWER SURVEYS AS DEPICTED ON THEIR DRAWINGS R-N4185 201 TO 205.

4) ALL LEVELS ARE IN METRES AND RELATED TO ORDNANCE DATUM.

5) EXISTING SERVICES ARE NOT NECESSARILY ALL SHOWN ON THIS OR

OTHER DRAWINGS. THE POSITION OF EXISTING SERVICES SHALL BE

LOCATED AND MARKED OUT ON THE GROUND BY THE CONTRACTOR

WITH THE SERVICE PROVIDER PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY

GROUND WORKS.

6) THE PURPOSE OF THIS DRAWING IS TO SHOW DETAILS FOR THE

CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED 'SECTION 278' WORKS. THESE

INCLUDE FOUR PASSING BAYS, CHANGES TO EXISTING KERB LINE AND

THE BELLMOUTH OF THE PROPOSED ESTATE ROAD.

7) ALL WORKS WITHIN THE EXISTING HIGHWAY SHALL BE CARRIED OUT BY A

CONTRACTOR WHO HAS BEEN APPROVED BY NORFOLK COUNTY

COUNCIL TO CARRY OUT WORK WITHIN A PUBLIC HIGHWAY. THE WORK

SHALL BE CARRIED OUT FULLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 'NEW ROADS

AND STREET WORKS ACT 1991' AND TO CHAPTER 8 OF THE 'TRAFFIC

SIGNS MANUAL'. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE, ERECT, MAINTAIN

AND REMOVE UPON COMPLETION ALL TEMPORARY SIGNING REQUIRED

FOR WORKS CARRIED OUT WITHIN THE EXISTING HIGHWAY. HE SHALL

LIAISE WITH THE STREET WORKS COORDINATOR OF THE COUNTY

COUNCIL WITH REGARD TO PLANNING AND AGREEING APPROPRIATE

METHODS OF TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT. ALL REQUIRED NOTICES SHALL BE

PLACED WITH THE COUNTY COUNCIL BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO

WORKS COMMENCING IN THE HIGHWAY.

8) ALL REINSTATEMENT TO THE EXISTING HIGHWAY SHALL BE CARRIED OUT

FULLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HAUC 'SPECIFICATION FOR THE

REINSTATEMENT OF OPENINGS IN HIGHWAYS'. REINSTATEMENT SHALL

BE PERMANENT (ON FIRST VISIT) AND TO THE APPROVAL OF NORFOLK

COUNTY COUNCIL. TRENCH BACKFILL MATERIAL SHALL BE TYPE 1

GRANULAR SUB-BASE.

9) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT TO THE STREET WORKS

COORDINATOR AND UTILITY COMPANIES THE APPROPRIATE 'N' NOTICES.

UPON COMPLETION OF THE WORKS THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT TO

THE STREET WORKS COORDINATOR THE APPROPRIATE 'R' NOTICE.

10) ALL PROPRIETARY MATERIALS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE

WITH THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.

11) THE MAIN CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ACHIEVING AND

MAINTAINING THE STABILITY OF EARTHWORKS AND ANY EXISTING

STRUCTURES ON THE SITE AND ADJOINING SITES, TAKING ALL

NECESSARY PRECAUTIONS TO SAFEGUARD THIS STABILITY. ADEQUATE

SHORING IS TO BE INSERTED DURING THE WORKS TO ENSURE STABILITY

AND SUCH SHORING IS TO BE ADEQUATELY FOUNDED AND BRACED.

12) DRAINAGE SOAKAWAYS FOR PASSING BAYS HAVE BEEN SIZED FOR A

DRAINED AREA EQUAL TO THE AREA OF THE PASSING BAY PLUS HALF OF

THE ADJACENT EXISTING CARRIAGWAY. THE SOAKAWAYS ARE DESIGNED

FOR A 10 YEAR STORM AND AN ASSUMED DESIGN INFILTRATION RATE OF

5x10

-6

m/s. SEE DRAWING 141222/CL-1012 FOR SOAKAWAY DETAILS.

© ROSSI LONG CONSULTING 2018.

ALL WORKS TO BE CARRIED OUT IN LINE

WITH THE CURRENT NATIONAL JOINT

UTILITIES GROUP GUIDELINES

NJUG NOTE

LOCATION PLAN

Scale 1:2500

PASSING BAY 1

Scale 1:200

PASSING BAY 2

Scale 1:200

PASSING BAY 4

Scale 1:200

PASSING BAY 3

Scale 1:200

SEE INSET

INSET

Scale 1:200

PASSING

BAY 4

PASSING

BAY 3

PASSING

BAY 2

PASSING

BAY 1

PROPOSED ESTATE ROAD

(SEE DRAWING 141222/CL-1011FOR DETAILS)

AutoCAD SHX Text

Grass

AutoCAD SHX Text

Blacktop

AutoCAD SHX Text

Grass

AutoCAD SHX Text

Blacktop

AutoCAD SHX Text

Grass

AutoCAD SHX Text

Blacktop

AutoCAD SHX Text

Dense Vegetation

AutoCAD SHX Text

Grass

AutoCAD SHX Text

Grass

AutoCAD SHX Text

Blacktop

AutoCAD SHX Text

W/M 1.2h

AutoCAD SHX Text

Kerb

AutoCAD SHX Text

Kerb

AutoCAD SHX Text

SP

AutoCAD SHX Text

41.47

AutoCAD SHX Text

RS

AutoCAD SHX Text

P

46.0

47.0

48.0

49.0

me

tre

s

CHAINAGE (m)

EXISTING GROUND LEVEL (m)

DATUM 45.00mAD

LEFT HAND CHANNEL (m)

CENTRE LINE (m)

RIGHT HAND CHANNEL (m)

VERTICAL ALIGNMENT

HORIZONTAL ALIGNMENT

RO

AD

A

LIG

NM

EN

T

PROPOSED CAMBER/CROSS FALLS

CHAINAGE & [LEVEL]

50.0

LONGITUDINAL SECTION FOR START OF PROPOSED ESTATE ROAD

SCALE :- 1:200(hor); 1:50(ver)

me

tre

s

CAMBER 1/40 (2.50%)

00.000

5.000

10.000

15.000

20.000

25.000

30.000

46.0

47.0

48.0

49.0

50.0

STRAIGHT

0.000

30.000

30.000

0.00

0

G =-1.462%

L =30.266m

48.010

48.272

48.173

48.031

48.025

48.025

48.026

48.026

48.027

48.027

48.027

48.027

48.028

48.007

47.952

47.897

47.799

47.757

47.717

48.010

47.995

47.981

47.966

47.952

47.937

47.922

47.908

47.893

47.878

47.864

47.849

47.835

47.820

47.805

47.791

47.718

47.644

47.571

CENTRELINE PROFILE

OF PROPOSED ROAD

LH & RH CHANNEL

OF PROPOSED ROAD

EXISTING GROUND PROFILE

ALONG CENTRELINE

BELLMOUTH OF ESTATE ROAD TO BE

CONSTRUCTED UNDER A

SECTION 278 AGREEMENT

PROPOSED INDUSTRIAL ESTATE ROAD

(PLEASE REFER TO OTHER DRAWINGS FOR DETAILS)

14.000

47.714

47.700

47.627

47.553

47.480

47.714

47.700

47.627

47.553

47.480

EXISTING CARRIAGEWAY

EDGE OF CHURCH LANE

4

8

.

0

0

4

7

.

8

0

4

7

.

9

0

4

8

.

1

0

4

8

.

1

0

4

8

.

0

0

4

7

.

8

0

4

7

.

9

0

4

8

.

1

0

4

8

.

1

0

4

7

.

5

5

4

7

.

6

0

4

7

.

6

5

4

7

.

7

0

4

7

.

7

5

4

8

.

0

0

4

7

.

9

0

4

7

.

9

5

4

8

.

0

5

4

8

.

1

0

4

8

.

1

5

4

8

.

2

0

4

7

.8

5

4

7

.

9

0

4

7

.

9

5

48.00

4

7

.

8

0

4

7

.

8

5

4

7

.

9

0

47.95

4

8

.

0

5

4

7

.

6

5

4

7

.

7

0

4

7

.

7

5

4

7

.

8

0

4

7

.

8

5

47.65

47.70

47.75

47.80

00

1

0

2

0

3

0

4

0

0

5

10

14

15

20

25

30

0

5

1

0

15

2

0

2

1

0

5

1

0

1

5

20

21

PR

OP

OS

ED

IND

US

TR

IAL

ES

TA

TE

RO

AD

S

P

7

5

S

P

7

5

R

1

0

m

R

1

0

m

7

.3

m

1

0

m

S

E

C

T

IO

N

O

F

H

E

D

G

E

T

O

B

E

R

E

M

O

V

E

D

EXISTING MATURE

TREE TO BE

RETAINED. CANOPY

TO BE PRUNED

C

H

U

R

C

H

L

A

N

E

M4

M3

M1

M2

GRADE VERGE TO

BACK OF KERB WITH

FRESH TOP SOIL AND

GRASS SEED

GRADE VERGE TO

BACK OF KERB WITH

FRESH TOP SOIL AND

GRASS SEED

E

X

T

E

N

T

O

F

S

2

7

8

W

O

R

K

S

E

X

T

E

N

T

O

F

S

2

7

8

W

O

R

K

S

P

R

O

P

O

S

E

D

C

O

N

T

IN

U

A

T

IO

N

O

F

E

S

T

A

T

E

R

O

A

D

B

O

U

N

D

A

R

Y

O

F

D

E

V

E

L

O

P

M

E

N

T

S

I

T

E

BOUNDARY BETWEEN

SOUTH NORFOLK AND

BROADLAND AREAS

PROPOSED NEW

CARRIAGEWAY EDGE

EXISTING

CARRIAGEWAY

EDGE

EXISTING

CARRIAGEWAY

EDGE

STEPPED TIE-IN DETAIL TO

EXISTING CARRIAGEWAY AND

RESURFACED FOR FIRST 1m IN

FROM EXISTING EDGE

2.4x215m

V

IS

IB

ILIT

Y S

PLA

Y

VIS

IBIL

ITY

EN

VE

LO

PE

2

.

4

x

2

1

5

m

V

I

S

I

B

I

L

I

T

Y

S

P

L

A

Y

V

I

S

I

B

I

L

I

T

Y

E

N

V

E

L

O

P

E

EXISTING

CARRIAGEWAY

EDGE

A

S

S

U

M

E

D

H

I

G

H

W

A

Y

B

O

U

N

D

A

R

Y

ASSUMED HIGHWAY BOUNDARY

STN

9

46.0

47.0

48.0

49.0

me

tre

s

50.0

me

tre

s

46.0

47.0

48.0

49.0

50.0

PROPOSED RIGHT

HAND CHANNEL

EXISTING GROUND

PROFILE ALONG RIGHT

HAND CHANNEL

EXISTING GROUND

PROFILE ALONG LEFT

HAND CHANNEL

PROPOSED LEFT

HAND CHANNEL

00

.0

00

01

.0

00

02

.0

00

03

.0

00

04

.0

00

05

.0

00

06

.0

00

07

.0

00

08

.0

00

09

.0

00

10

.0

00

11

.0

00

12

.0

00

13

.0

00

14

.0

00

15

.0

00

16

.0

00

17

.0

00

18

.0

00

19

.0

00

20

.0

00

20

.6

07

47

.9

62

48

.0

31

48

.0

60

48

.0

59

48

.0

58

48

.0

57

48

.0

56

48

.0

58

48

.0

59

48

.0

63

48

.0

67

48

.0

73

48

.1

10

48

.1

91

48

.2

51

48

.2

63

48

.2

19

48

.1

85

48

.1

69

48

.1

68

48

.1

81

48

.1

88

47

.7

14

47

.7

37

47

.7

60

47

.7

83

47

.8

06

47

.8

29

47

.8

52

47

.8

75

47

.8

98

47

.9

21

47

.9

44

47

.9

67

47

.9

90

48

.0

13

48

.0

36

48

.0

59

48

.0

82

48

.1

05

48

.1

28

48

.1

51

48

.1

74

48

.1

88

00

.0

00

01

.0

00

02

.0

00

03

.0

00

04

.0

00

05

.0

00

06

.0

00

07

.0

00

08

.0

00

09

.0

00

10

.0

00

11

.0

00

12

.0

00

13

.0

00

14

.0

00

15

.0

00

16

.0

00

17

.0

00

18

.0

00

19

.0

00

20

.0

00

20

.8

93

47

.9

41

47

.9

78

47

.9

91

47

.9

91

47

.9

90

47

.9

89

47

.9

88

47

.9

85

47

.9

84

47

.9

84

47

.9

85

47

.9

86

47

.9

88

48

.0

15

48

.0

59

48

.0

88

48

.1

02

48

.1

06

48

.1

16

48

.1

19

48

.1

16

48

.1

08

47

.7

14

47

.7

24

47

.7

34

47

.7

44

47

.7

54

47

.7

64

47

.7

74

47

.7

84

47

.7

94

47

.8

04

47

.8

14

47

.8

24

47

.8

34

47

.8

44

47

.8

54

47

.8

64

47

.8

74

47

.8

84

47

.8

94

47

.9

04

47

.9

14

47

.9

23

DATUM 45.00mAD

CHANNEL PROFILES FOR JUCTION OF PROPOSED

ESTATE ROAD AND CHURCH ROAD

SCALE :- 1:200(hor); 1:50(ver)

LEFT

HAND

CHANNEL

CHAINAGE (m)

EXISTING LEVEL (m)

PROPOSED LEVEL (m)

LEFT

HAND

CHANNEL

CHAINAGE (m)

EXISTING LEVEL (m)

PROPOSED LEVEL (m)

CHAINAGE ON CENTRELINE (m)

PROPOSED LEVEL ON CENTRELINE (m)

14

.0

00

47

.8

05

10

.0

00

47

.8

64

5.0

00

47

.9

37

0.0

00

48

.0

10

15

.0

00

47

.7

91

20

.0

00

47

.7

18


FIRST ISSUE FOR APPROVAL/COMMENT 12/03/18P1







CONSTRUCTION RISKS:


DEMOLITION RISKS:

!

TITLE

STAGE:-



CLIENT

PROJECT




SCALE AT A1

P1

PRELIMINARY

141222 CL-1011

IAN ALSTON


NORFOLK FOOD HUB

CHURCH LANE, EASTON

DETAILS OF JUNCTION FOR

PROPOSED ESTATE ROAD WITH

CHURCH LANE

GMA 12/03/18 1:200(h); 1:50(v)

N

O

N

L

Y

IN

D

IC

A

T

IV

E

GENERAL NOTES







BE USED.


ENGINEER'S DRAWINGS AND DETAILS, THE SPECIFICATION FOR THE

WORKS, THE RELEVANT ARCHITECT'S DRAWINGS AND ANY OTHER

SPECIALIST'S DRAWINGS.

3) REFER TO ALL GENERAL NOTES ON DRAWING CL-1010.


CONTINUATION OF ESTATE ROAD BEYOND EXTENT

OF S278 WORKS TO BE DESIGNED BY OTHERS

GMA

AutoCAD SHX Text

Ploughed Field

AutoCAD SHX Text

Grass

AutoCAD SHX Text

Grass

AutoCAD SHX Text

Grass

AutoCAD SHX Text

Blacktop

AutoCAD SHX Text

Blacktop

C

L

12

3

4

CARRIAGEWAY (7.3m WIDE)

1:40 CROSSFALL

TYPICAL CROSS SECTION FOR PROPOSED INDUSTRIAL ESTATE ROAD

1:20

1:40 CROSSFALL

FULL FACE KERB TO

DETAIL 'A' WITH 100m

UPSTAND

FULL FACE KERB TO

DETAIL 'A' WITH 100m

UPSTAND

GRADE VERGE TO

EXISTING LEVELS, TOP

SOIL AND GRASS SEED.

(GRADING NOT TO

EXCEED 1:2 SLOPE)

GRADE VERGE TO



(GRADING NOT TO

EXCEED 1:2 SLOPE)

1

2

3

4

200

PASSING BAY

TYPICAL DETAIL FOR TIE-IN TO EXISTING

CARRIAGEWAY ALONG PASSING BAYS AND AT

PROPOSED ESTATE ROAD

1:10

EXISTING

CARRIAGEWAY EDGE

CHURCH LANE CARRIAGEWAY


CONSTRUCTION


TO BE NEATLY CUT BACK

TO SOUND MATERIAL AS

SHOWN

ALL VERTICAL FACES TO BE FREE

FROM LOOSE MATERIAL AND

COATED WITH A HOT BITUMINOUS

BINDER TO CLAUSE 706.7

(1)

ALL BOUND SURFACES TO BE CLEAN AND FREE

FROM STANDING WATER AND COATED WITH A

BITUMINOUS SPRAY TACK COAT TO CLAUSES

903.4

(1)

AND 920

(1)

40mm WIDE OVER-BAND

USING SKID RESISTANT

RUBBERISED BITUMEN

1

2

4

3

380

VARIES

(MIN 300)

200 200500

VERGE CARRIAGEWAY HAUNCH/WIDENING

TYPICAL DETAIL FOR EDGE HAUNCH/WIDENING

(WITH PROPOSED KERB)

1:10

'H

'

'H' = specify

EXISTING

CARRIAGEWAY EDGE



CONSTRUCTION

PROPOSED

KERB

EARTHWORKS

OUTLINE

TOPSOIL

TOPSOIL AND TURF OR

SEED IF VERGE. FOOTWAY

CONSTRUCTION, IF

FOOTWAY


TO BE NEATLY CUT BACK

TO SOUND MATERIAL AS

SHOWN

ALL VERTICAL FACES TO BE FREE

FROM LOOSE MATERIAL AND

COATED WITH A HOT BITUMINOUS

BINDER TO CLAUSE 706.7

(1)

ALL EXISTING SURFACES TO BE CLEAN AND FREE

FROM STANDING WATER AND COATED WITH A

BITUMINOUS SPRAY TACK COAT TO CLAUSES

903.4

(1)

AND 920

(1)

450

175

'Y

'

15

01

50

FINISHED

CARRIAGEWAY

SURFACE

TYPE 1 SUB-BASE

CONCRETE BED

('ST2' MIX)

DETAIL A

1:10

10

0

NOTES:

1) MORTAR BED MAY BE OMITTED IF METHOD OF LAYING KERBS DIRECT

ONTO WET CONCRETE IS APPROVED BY THE HIGHWAYS INSPECTOR.

2) THE BACKING CONCRETE MUST BE PLACED WITHIN ONE HOUR OF

LAYING THE CONCRETE BED.

80

'Y' TO BE MIN

2

3

OF KERB DEPTH

300

PAVEMENT

CONSTRUCTION

10-40mm THICK

SAND/CEMENT CLASS 1

MORTAR BED (see note 1)

PRECAST CONCRETE

45° SPLAYED KERB,

125x255mm TYPE 'SP' TO

BSEN1340 FIG NA.1(b)

ROAD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION

LAYER SPECIFICATION

COMPACTED

THICKNESS

(mm)

CA

RR

IA

GE

WA

Y

1

HRA 30/14 F SURF 40/60

HOT ROLLED ASPHALT SURFACE COURSE TO PD6691:2015, TABLE C2A

COL 8, TYPE F DESIGN MIX CONTAINING 30% COARSE AGGREGATE OF

CRUSHED ROCK WITH A MAXIMUM AGGREGATE SIZE OF 14mm, A TYPE F

FINE AGGREGATE OF CRUSHED ROCK AND A 40/60 PENETRATION

GRADE BITUMEN BINDER. SURFACE TO HAVE PRE-COATED CHIPPINGS

OF 20mm NOM SIZE, WITH A MIN PSV OF 55 (58 ON APPROACHES TO

JUNCTIONS), ROLLED IN TO GIVE TEXTURE DEPTH OF 1.2mm

(MEASURED BY SAND PATCH METHOD). CHANNEL BOARDS TO BE USED

TO GIVE A CHIPPING FREE CHANNEL.

40

2

(7)

HRA 50/20 BIN 40/60

HOT ROLLED ASPHALT BINDER COURSE TO PD6691:2015, TABLE C1, MIX

CONTAINING 50% AGGREGATE WITH A MAXIMUM AGGREGATE SIZE OF

20mm AND A 40/60 PENETRATION GRADE BITUMEN BINDER.

60

3

(7)

HRA 60/32 BASE 40/60

HOT ROLLED ASPHALT TO PD6691:2015, TABLE C1, MIX CONTAINING 60%

AGGREGATE WITH A MAXIMUM AGGREGATE SIZE OF 32mm AND A 40/60

PENETRATION GRADE BINDER.

120

4

GRANULAR SUB-BASE TYPE 1 TO CLAUSE 803

(1)

CERTIFIED AS

NON-FROST SUSCEPTIBLE, SPREAD EVENLY ON THE FORMATION IN

LAYERS NOT EXCEEDING 150mm COMPACTED THICKNESS.

COMPACTION TO CLAUSE 802

(1)

TO ACHIEVE A MINIMUM CBR VALUE OF

20%.

* ALTERNATIVE SUB-BASE THICKNESS IF USED WITH A CAPPING BELOW

CBR

(2)(3)(4)(6)

2.5% 5% 10% 15%

450 330 250 200

350* 240* 180* 150*

5

CLASS 6F1 OR 6F2 IF SITE WON OR IMPORTED 6F4 OR 6F5 CAPPING

MATERIAL TO TABLE 6/1

(1)

AND CLAUSE 613

(1)

COMPACTED IN LAYERS IN

ACCORDANCE WITH TABLE 6/4

(1)

.

250 210 180 150

SEE NOTES 4 & 6

VE

RG

E

6

GRASSED AREAS SHALL BE GRADED TO THE APPROVED LEVEL,

SPREAD WITH A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 100mm OF VEGETABLE SOIL AND

EITHER TURFED OR CULTIVATED AND SOWN AT THE APPROPRIATE

SEASON WITH APPROVED GRASS SEED AT A RATE OF 0.034kg/m

2

. THE

FINISHED VERGE SHALL BE LEVEL WITH THE ADJACENT FOOTWAY AND

KERBS AND SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM WIDTH OF NOT LESS THAN 1m.

MIN 100

GENERAL FILL

CLASS 1 GRANULAR FILL MATERIAL TO TABLE 6/1

(1)

AND CLAUSE 613

(1)

COMPACTED IN LAYERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH TABLE 6/4

(1)

.

AS REQUIRED

NOTES:

1: SPECIFICATION FOR HIGHWAY WORKS PUBLISHED BY THE DEPARTMENT FOR TRANSPORT.

2: CONSTRUCTION THICKNESS FOR PROVEN ALTERNATIVE SUB-GRADE CBR VALUES.

3: WHERE CBR VALUE IS LESS THAN 2.5% SPECIAL ENGINEERING CONSIDERATIONS WILL BE REQUIRED.

4: SUB-BASE TO BE THICKENED OR CAPPING LAYER TO BE USED TO GIVE A TOTAL CONSTRUCTION DEPTH OF CARRIAGEWAY

OF 450mm WHERE SUB-GRADE IS FROST SUSCEPTIBLE.

5: BITUMEN GRADES TO COMPLY WITH EN12591 WHICH REPLACES BS3690. NEW GRADES OF 40/60, 100/150 AND 160/220 PEN

REPLACES THE FORMER BS GRADES OF 50, 100 AND 200 PEN.

6: CBR AT FORMATION IS ASSUMED TO BE NOT LESS THAN 5% (TO BE CONFIRMED BY CBR TESTING).

7: ALL BOUND SURFACES SHALL BE THOROUGHLY CLEANED AND A BOND COAT TO BS594987 AND CL920 OF SHW SPRAYED ON

IMMEDIATELY PRIOR TO THE NEXT LAYER BEING LAID.

1

23

4

EXISTING CARRIAGEWAY WIDTH OF CHURCH ROAD VARIES

EXISTING SURFACING TO BE

PLANED OFF AND NEW SURFACING

LAID FOR A WIDTH OF 1m ALONG

LENGTH OF PASSING BAY

PROPOSED PASSING BAY

OVERALL WIDTH OF EXISTING CARRIAGEWAY PLUS PASSING BAY TO BE NOT LESS THAN 6.5m

1:40 CROSSFALL

GRADE VERGE TO



(GRADING NOT TO

EXCEED 1:2 SLOPE)

EXISTING

CARRIAGEWAY

SURFACE

TYPICAL CROSS SECTION FOR PROPOSED PASSING BAY

1:20

2

3

4

1

VERGE

(MIN 500)

PASSING BAY

TYPICAL DETAIL FOR EDGE HAUNCH

(NO KERB)

1:10

FINISHED

SURFACING

EARTHWORKS

OUTLINE

TOPSOIL

150150

GRADING REQUIREMENTS FOR TYPE B FILTER MATERIAL

(FROM TABLE 5/5 OF THE SPECIFICATION FOR HIGHWAY WORKS)

PERCENTAGE BY MASS PASSING SIEVE

BS SIEVE SIZES

MILLIMETRES MICRONS

63 37.5 20 10 5 1.18 600 150

TYPE B 100 85-100 0-25 0-5 - - - -

LEVEL

'A'

SCHEDULE OF DIMENSIONS

AND LEVELS FOR PASSING BAY

SOAKAWAYS

REF

LENGTH

(m)

LEVEL (m)

'A' 'B'

SA-1 9.5 47.05 46.55

SA-2 8 43.70 43.20

SA-3 9.5 42.90 42.40

LEVEL

'B'

2000

EXISTING

CARRIAGEWAY

TYPICAL DETAIL PASSING BAY DRAINAGE SOAKAWAY

1:20

GRASSED VERGE.

(MAX GRADE 1:2)

1000

'TYPE B' FILTER MATERIAL

(SEE TABLE FOR GRADING)

WITH GEOTEXTILE FABRIC

TO VERTICAL SIDES

EXISTING VERGE HEIGHT

VARIES, BUT ENSURE MIN

150mm ALONG LENGTH

OF SOAKAWAY

VA

RIE

S

(M

IN

500)

400

PREFORMED CELLULAR SOAKAWAY

UNITS 'AQUACELL-CORE' OR SIMILAR

CELLULAR UNITS EACH MEASURING

1.0x0.5x0.4m DEEP HAVING AT LEAST

95% VOIDS

100mm COARSE

SAND BED AND

SURROUND

SOAKAWAY COMPLETELY WRAPPED WITH

A NON-WOVEN PERMEABLE GEOTEXTILE

FABRIC (300g) AND AN OUTER WRAP OF

THE SAME TO ENCLOSE SAND SURROUND

VARIES RELATIVE TO


EDGE, BUT MIN 50mm

EX

IS

TIN

G R

OA

D

CO

NS

TR

UC

TIO

N


FIRST ISSUE FOR COMMENT/APPROVAL. 12/03/18P1







CONSTRUCTION RISKS:


DEMOLITION RISKS:

!

TITLE

STAGE:-



CLIENT

PROJECT




SCALE AT A1

P1

PRELIMINARY

141222 CL-1012

IAN ALSTON


NORFOLK FOOD HUB

CHURCH LANE, EASTON

TYPICAL CONSTRUCTION

DETAILS FOR PROPOSED

HIGHWAY WORKS (sheet 1)

GMA 12/03/18 1:20; 1:10

GENERAL NOTES

1) DO NOT SCALE, IF IN DOUBT ASK. DIMENSIONS ARE IN MILLIMETRES

UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.


STRUCTURAL ENGINEER'S DRAWINGS AND DETAILS, THE SPECIFICATION

FOR THE WORKS, THE RELEVANT ARCHITECT'S DRAWINGS AND ANY

OTHER SPECIALIST'S DRAWINGS.

3) THE PRINCIPAL CONTRACTOR IS TO PROVIDE FULLY DESIGNED

PROPPING/SHORING TO FACILITATE THE WORKS. ALL PROPPING &

BRACING IS TO BE ADEQUATELY FOUNDED TO ENSURE THE

STABILITY/INTEGRITY OF THE EXISTING/PROPOSED STRUCTURES AND/OR

EARTHWORKS IS MAINTAINED.







BE USED.

5) REFER ALSO TO THE GENERAL NOTES ON LAYOUT DRAWINGS.

6) ALL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS, MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP TO BE IN

ACCORDANCE WITH NORFOLK COUNTY COUNCIL'S ROAD CONSTRUCTION

AND STREET LIGHTING SPECIFICATION (CURRENT EDITION), READ IN

CONJUNCTION WITH THE SPECIFICATION FOR HIGHWAYS WORKS

(PUBLISHED BY THE DEPARTMENT FOR TRANSPORT).


GMA

1 2

34

1

2

3

4

2.1-2.75m

3.75m

1.25m

0.6m

CARRIAGEWAY WIDTH ('W')

JUNCTION LINES (DIAG NO. 1003)

600 LINE, 300 GAP, 200 WIDE DOUBLE (300 GAP BETWEEN DOUBLE LINES).

JUNCTION LINES (DIAG NO. 1009)

600 LINE, 300 GAP, 100 WIDE.

WARNING LINES (WHERE 'W' >= 5.5m)

4000 LINE, 2000 GAP, 100 WIDE (DIAG NO. 1004): 30mph OR LESS (MIN OF 5 MARKS)

4000 LINE, 2000 GAP, 100 WIDE (DIAG NO. 1004): 40mph (MIN OF 7 MARKS)

6000 LINE, 3000 GAP, 100 WIDE (DIAG NO. 1004.1): >40mph (MIN OF 7 MARKS)

WARNING TRIANGLE (DIAG NO. 1023)

ROAD MARKINGS AT JUNCTIONS

1:100

ALL MARKINGS TO BE PAINTED USING WHITE THERMOPLASTIC

PAINT INCORPORATING SOLID GLASS BEADS FOR RELECTIVITY

1

2

5

3

4

6

7

450

900

CARRIAGEWAY

CONSTRUCTION

TOP OF FRAME SET A

NOMINAL 0-5mm BELOW

FINISHED SURFACE

TYPICAL ROAD GULLY DETAIL

1:20

(1) GULLY GRATING AND FRAME SHALL BE KITE-MARKED TO BSEN124

GRADE D400. ALL GRATINGS SHALL BE MANUFACTURED FROM CAST

IRON OR DUCTILE IRON, CLEARLY MARKED WITH THE MAKER'S NAME

AND THE GRADE OF THE THE GRATING, AND SHALL BE HINGED AND

NON-REMOVABLE. GULLY FRAME SHALL BE SET ON A 10-20mm THICK

CLASS 1 CEMENT MORTAR BED. GRATING AND FRAME TO BE SET 0-5mm

BELOW THE CARRIAGEWAY SURFACE AND FLUSH WITH THE KERB FACE;

ANY GAP SHALL BE FILLED WITH CLASS 1 MORTAR.

(2) AT LEAST TWO AND NOT MORE THAN FOUR COURSES CLASS B 215mm

ENGINEERING BRICKWORK TO BSEN771 & 772 LAID SQUARE ON 10mm

DESIGNATION (i) SAND/CEMENT MORTAR BED. BRICKWORK CORBELLED

AS NECESSARY (MAX 25mm PER ROW). CHANGE IN PROFILE FROM

SQUARE TO CIRCULAR TO BE SHAPED IN CLASS 1 MORTAR.

(3) GULLY POT TO BE PRECAST CONCRETE TRAPPED TO BS5911-6(2004)

HAVING INTERNAL DIMENSIONS 450mmØ AND 900mm MIN DEPTH.

ALTERNATIVELY, BBA APPROVED uPVC PLASTIC GULLY POTS

COMPLYING WITH BS1401 AND BSEN13598 MAY BE USED.

(4) 150mm THICK CONCRETE SURROUND (MIX 'ST4' TO BS8500).

(5) WHERE THE GULLY CONNECTION PIPE PASSES UNDER THE

CARRIAGEWAY THE INVERT OF THE PIPE AT THE OUTLET SHALL BE SET

AT LEAST 175mm BELOW FORMATION LEVEL. THE INVERT SHALL BE AT

LEAST 315mm BELOW THE TOP OF THE SUB-BASE. A MIN 150mm THICK

CONCRETE SURROUND (MIX 'ST2') SHALL BE CONTINUED TO THE

CONNECTION PIPE UNTIL A DEPTH OF COVER OF 900mm TO THE CROWN

OF THE PIPE HAS BEEN ACHIEVED.

(6) PLASTIC STOPPER AND CHAIN.

(7) JOINT FILLER BOARD TO MAINTAIN FLEXIBLE JOINTS THROUGH

CONCRETE SURROUND.

NOTE:

WHERE THE TOTAL ROAD CONSTRUCTION DEPTH EXCEEDS 450mm AND

THE GULLY CONNECTION PIPE PASSES UNDER THE CARRIAGEWAY MORE

THAN THREE COURSES OF BRICKWORK WILL BE PERMITTED TO A

MAXIMUM OF FIVE COURSES.

CARRIAGEWAY

KERB LINE

TYPICAL DETAIL FOR SIGN AND POST

1:20

30

MIN

C

LE

AR

H

EIG

HT

2

.2

m

350x350sq

60

0

APPROVED 76Ø

GREY PVC COATED

STEEL SIGN POST

'ST2'

CONCRETE

BASE

RE-USE EXISTING

30mph SIGN PLATE

VERGE

SEE LAYOUT PLAN FOR

LOCATION OF SIGNAGE

70

70


FIRST ISSUE FOR APPROVAL/COMMENT 12/03/18P1







CONSTRUCTION RISKS:


DEMOLITION RISKS:

!

TITLE

STAGE:-



CLIENT

PROJECT




SCALE AT A2

P1

PRELIMINARY

141222 CL-1013

IAN ALSTON


NORFOLK FOOD HUB

CHURCH LANE, EASTON

TYPICAL CONSTRUCTION

DETAILS FOR PROPOSED

HIGHWAY WORKS (sheet 2)

GMA 12/03/18 1:100; 1:20

GENERAL NOTES

1) DO NOT SCALE, IF IN DOUBT ASK. DIMENSIONS ARE IN MILLIMETRES

UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.


STRUCTURAL ENGINEER'S DRAWINGS AND DETAILS, THE SPECIFICATION

FOR THE WORKS, THE RELEVANT ARCHITECT'S DRAWINGS AND ANY

OTHER SPECIALIST'S DRAWINGS.

3) PLEASE REFER TO GENERAL NOTES ON OTHER DRAWINGS.


GMA

Microsoft Outlook - Memo Style€¦ · 1 Emma Goddard From: food hub Sent: 29 March 2018 09:42 To:...

Documents

Transcript of Microsoft Outlook - Memo Style€¦ · 1 Emma Goddard From: food hub Sent: 29 March 2018 09:42 To:...