microRNAs as mediators of insect host-pathogen interactions ...337628/UQ337628...4 52 the...
Transcript of microRNAs as mediators of insect host-pathogen interactions ...337628/UQ337628...4 52 the...
-
Journal of Insect Physiology
Journal of Insect Physiology
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinsphys.2014.08.003http://dx.doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinsphys.2014.08.003
-
Review article
microRNAs as mediators of insect host-pathogen interactions and
immunity
Mazhar Hussain and Sassan Asgari*
Australian Infectious Disease Research Centre, School of Biological Sciences, The
University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia
* To whom correspondence should be addressed: Asgari, S, Australian Infectious Disease
Research Centre, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia
QLD 4072, Tel: (617) 3365-2043; Fax: (617) 3365-1655; Email: [email protected].
-
2
Abstract 1
Insects are the most successful group of animals on earth, owing this partly to their very effective 2
immune responses to microbial invasion. These responses mainly include cellular and humoral 3
responses as well as RNA interference (RNAi). Small non-coding RNAs (snRNAs) produced 4
through RNAi are important molecules in the regulation of gene expression in almost all living 5
organisms; contributing to important processes such as development, differentiation, immunity as 6
well as host-microorganism interactions. The main snRNAs produced by the RNAi response 7
include short interfering RNAs, microRNAs and piwi-interacting RNAs. In addition to the host 8
snRNAs, some microorganisms encode snRNAs that affect the dynamics of host-pathogen 9
interactions. In this review, we will discuss the latest developments in regards to the role of 10
microRNA in insect host-pathogen interactions and provide some insights into this rapidly 11
developing area of research. 12
1. Introduction 13
1.1. Unfolding the multiple layers of insect responses to microbial infection 14
Multiple mechanisms of attack and counter-attack or host defences have evolved during the natural 15
process of the host-pathogen arms race. Animals defend themselves against microorganisms in two 16
major ways: innate and/or acquired immune systems. The main difference between the two systems 17
is the involvement of germline encoded factors for recognizing and destroying pathogens in innate 18
immunity, while in acquired immunity effector molecules are produced to recognize antigens 19
leading to the development of immunological memory. In the insect world, the immune system is 20
based on innate immune responses that can be further categorised into three main parts: (1) 21
pathogen immobilization, (2) core immune signalling pathways (Toll, Imd and JAK-STAT) and (3) 22
the RNAi pathway. Pathogen immobilization is a cellular response towards fungal and bacterial 23
infections in the form of phagocytosis, engulfment, melanisation, coagulation and autophagy 24
(Dushay, 2009; Jiravanichpaisal et al., 2006). These responses help in immobilizing pathogens, 25
which are then destroyed extracellularly by antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) or eliminated 26
-
3
intracellularly. In response to systemic infection, AMPs are produced and secreted in the 27
haemolymph that directly attack microbes (Bulet et al., 1999). 28
Upon pathogen invasion, activation of immune signalling pathways usually ensues. In insects, these 29
are mainly the Toll, Imd and JAK/STAT pathways. The Toll pathway is activated through an 30
endogenous ligand namely the Nerve Growth Factor-related cytokine Spätzle (Spz) (Weber et al., 31
2003). Binding of Spz triggers a conformational change in the Toll receptor which activates the 32
downstream signalling pathway (Gangloff et al., 2008). The Toll-Spz interaction is the convergence 33
point for the activation of three pathogen recognition pathways; one triggered by fungal or bacterial 34
proteases, one induced by recognition of fungal cell wall and one activated by Lysine-type bacterial 35
peptidoglycan (El Chamy et al., 2008; Gottar et al., 2006; Ligoxygakis et al., 2002). Following 36
receptor activation, MyD88 proteins interact with Toll through their respective Toll/Interleukin-1 37
receptor domains and recruit the Drosophila melanogaster IRAK homologue, the kinase Pelle that 38
phosphorylates Cactus for degradation. Upon Cactus degradation, the NF-κB homologues, Dorsal 39
or Dif, are freed to move to the nucleus and regulate hundreds of target genes (Tauszig-Delamasure 40
et al., 2002; Towb et al., 2001). 41
The Immune deficiency (Imd) pathway is activated by meso-diaminopimelic acid (DAP)-type 42
bacterial peptidoglycans that form the cell wall of Gram-negative bacteria and some Gram-positive 43
Bacilli. Pathogen recognition in Imd occurs through the transmembrane receptor PGRP-LC and the 44
intracellular receptor PGRP-LE that are critical for recognizing extracellular bacteria. Flies deficient 45
in both of these proteins are unable to induce AMPs in response to Gram-negative bacteria and are 46
therefore highly susceptible to these infections (Kaneko et al., 2006). 47
The JAK/STAT signalling pathway has been shown to be involved in insect immunity, in particular 48
anti-viral responses and hemocyte development (Agaisse and Perrimon, 2004; Dostert et al., 2005); 49
although the mechanism of activation of the pathway by viruses is not known. The signal 50
transduction pathway consists of unpaired 1-3 ligands, the receptor domeless, the kinase JAK and 51
-
4
the transcription factor STAT. Upon activation of the pathway, STAT is phosphorylated and 52
translocated into the nucleus, thus, activating several target genes. 53
1.2. RNA interference an effective anti-viral defence against viruses 54
RNA interference (RNAi) is another arm of the multilayered defence system in insects involved in 55
gene regulation, genome protection and anti-viral responses. Short interfering RNAs (siRNAs), 56
microRNAs (miRNAs) and piwi-interacting RNAs (piRNAs) are the three main types of small non-57
coding RNAs (snRNAs) central to the RNAi response pathway. Recently, a connection between the 58
JAK/STAT signalling transduction and the RNAi pathway has been established in mosquitoes as 59
part of the anti-viral immunity through the secretion of the signalling molecule, vago (Paradkar et 60
al., 2012). This suggests the effective communications between different pathways associated with 61
the innate immune responses in insects. Likewise, involvement of several miRNAs generated by 62
host cells or encoded by viral genomes in host-pathogen interactions have recently opened up new 63
research avenues in insect-microbe interactions. As the field of RNAi is rapidly expanding, in this 64
review article, we will mainly focus on the role of miRNAs in insect host-pathogen crosstalk and 65
immunity with the majority of examples from viruses as more relevant literature is available. For 66
other types of small RNAs and their role in anti-viral responses, readers are referred to recent 67
reviews (e.g. Sabin and Cherry, 2013; Bronkhorst and van Rij, 2014). 68
2. miRNA biogenesis at a glance 69
Since the discovery of the first miRNA from Caenorhabditis elegans just over two decades ago 70
(Lee et al., 1993) our understanding of miRNA biogenesis and its interaction with targets has 71
tremendously increased and is continuously evolving. In addition to the canonical pathway of 72
miRNA biogenesis, several non-canonical pathways have been described. Based on the canonical 73
pathway, a miRNA gene is transcribed in the nucleus by RNA polymerase II producing the primary 74
miRNA (pri-miRNA) transcript that could be variable in length but contains one or several stem-75
loop structures (Fig. 1). A nuclear residing ribonuclease, Drosha, in association with Pasha (in 76
insects) cleaves the stem-loop producing a ∼70 nt hairpin precursor miRNA (pre-miRNA) that is 77
-
5
translocated into the cytoplasm by Exportin-5. In the cytoplasm, the hairpin head is cleaved by 78
another ribonuclease enzyme, Dicer, producing a short duplex RNA molecule. In insects, two dicer 79
proteins have been identified: Dicer-1 that is mainly involved in the miRNA biogenesis, and Dicer-80
2 that produces siRNAs. The miRNA duplex triggers the formation of the RNA induced silencing 81
complex (RISC) in which an Argonaut (Ago) protein is the main component. Most miRNAs are 82
loaded into RISC that includes Ago1 and siRNAs into Ago2 complexes; however, recent research 83
indicates that miRNAs can also be loaded into Ago2 complexes (Ghildiyal et al., 2010; Rubio and 84
Belles, 2013), especially as the insect ages (Abe et al., 2014). Once the miRNA duplex becomes 85
associated with the RISC, one of the strands is degraded (referred to as miRNA* strand) and the 86
other one forms the mature miR-RISC complex. In some instances, the miRNA* strand is retained 87
and loaded into Ago2 and can be functional (Ghildiyal et al., 2010). Finally, the mature miRNA 88
guides the complex to target mRNA(s) in a sequence specific manner, leading to post-89
transcriptional gene regulation, or the complex might be transported into the nucleus where the 90
miRNA normally binds to the promoter regions of target genes regulating gene expression at the 91
transcriptional level. Notably, each miRNA may have multiple mRNA targets and each mRNA may 92
be targeted by multiple miRNAs. 93
3. Role of microRNAs as moderators of host-pathogen interactions 94
While there is a lot known about the role of miRNAs in insect development, less is understood 95
about their function in host-pathogen interactions. Nevertheless, accumulating evidence in recent 96
years has suggested their effects on host-microorganisms interactions and cross-kingdom 97
communications. For example, several cellular as well as viral miRNAs have been found to be 98
involved in assisting or limiting virus replication (see below). What is commonly observed in 99
various host-pathogen systems is the differential abundance of host miRNAs following an infection, 100
which varies at different stages of infection and type of pathogen involved. Concurrently, a large 101
number of host genes are found down- or upregulated that could be regulated by miRNAs or other 102
types of snRNAs. These changes in miRNA/mRNA profiles could be part of the host anti-pathogen 103
-
6
response or controlled by pathogen manipulation, including miRNAs expressed by viruses. Below, 104
we will examine several relevant examples of the role miRNAs play in mediating host-pathogen 105
interactions. 106
3.1. Host-virus interactions 107
3.1.1. Impact of viral infection on the host miRNA profile 108
In recent years, based on deep sequencing or microarray analysis, several publications have 109
appeared reporting changes in the expression levels of cellular miRNAs in insects in response to 110
pathogen infection, although in the majority of these cases functional analyses are still lacking. For 111
example, the abundance of a large number of miRNAs was changed in Spodoptera frugiperda (Sf9) 112
cells following infection with Autographa californica multiple nucleopolyhedrovirus (AcMNPV). 113
These included several upregulated miRNAs (e.g. miR-184, miR-998 and miR-10) at 24 h post-114
infection (hpi), with expression of some of those downregulated at 72 hpi (Mehrabadi et al., 2013). 115
In addition, three of the novel S. frugiperda miRNAs identified in the study showed upregulation 116
upon virus infection. Relevant to baculoviruses, Helicoverpa armigera single nucleopolyhedrovirus 117
(HaSNPV) was shown to cause changes in the abundance of host miRNAs (Jayachandran et al., 118
2013). Among those, miR-14 that positively regulates H. armigera ecdysone receptor (Ha-EcR) in 119
this insect was downregulated upon infection providing an example of virus-medicated 120
manipulation of host physiology. 121
In Bombyx mori larvae infected with B. mori cytoplasmic polyhedrosis virus (BmCPV), 58 122
miRNAs were found significantly up or downregulated in the midgut as compared with that of non-123
infected larvae at 72 and 96 hpi (Wu et al., 2013). Based on gene ontology (GO) analysis, the 124
putative target genes of six of the differentially expressed miRNAs (bmo-miR-275, miR-14, miR-125
1a, N-50, N-46 and N-45) were associated with response to stimulus and immune system process. 126
The authors speculated that significant increases in miR-275 levels following BmCPV infection 127
could explain the stunted growth phenotype in virus-infected B. mori, since the miRNA has been 128
shown to regulate development during metamorphosis (Liu et al., 2010). In another study, 129
-
7
microarray analysis showed differential expression of at least 20 miRNAs in a Heliothis zea fat 130
body (HzFB) cell line upon infection with Heliothis virescens ascovirus (HvAV3e) with three of 131
them (Hz-miR-24, -22, -7) significantly downregulated (Hussain and Asgari, 2010). 132
Arthropod-borne viruses (arboviruses) have also been demonstrated to alter the host miRNA 133
profile. For example, in Culex quinquefasciatus infected with West Nile virus (WNV) 134
downregulation of miR-989 and upregulation of miR-92 was noted (Skalsky et al., 2010). Deep 135
sequencing analysis of Aedes aegypti mosquitoes infected with dengue virus (DENV) at 2, 4 and 9 136
days post-infection revealed differential abundance of 35 miRNAs. Among those miR-5119-5p, 137
miR-34-3p, miR-87-5p and miR-988-5p were upregulated (Campbell et al., 2013). As more of these 138
studies emerge, it will become possible to carry out comparative studies to find out which miRNAs 139
are commonly involved in host-pathogen responses in different host insects and whether particular 140
miRNAs could be specifically regulated in response to particular groups of pathogens (e.g. viruses, 141
bacteria, etc). 142
3.1.2. Cellular miRNAs target viral genes 143
Given alteration of the abundance of host miRNAs following infection, it is likely that some of 144
those could directly target viral genes. For instance, in H. zea HzFB cells, miR-24 downregulates 145
DNA dependent RNA polymerase II RPC2 (DdRP; ORF64) and DdRP β subunits (DdRP; ORF82) 146
of HvAV3e (Hussain and Asgari, 2010). Interestingly, this miRNA is selectively downregulated 147
early in infection allowing transcription of viral genes required for virus replication suggesting that 148
the virus may actively suppress host miRNAs that directly target its genes. Relevant to this, in B. 149
mori, several targets of the cellular bmo-miR-8 were predicted in Bombyx mori 150
nucleopolyhedrovirus (BmNPV) genes (see below). Inhibition of this miRNA led to 8-fold increase 151
in viral titre in the fat bodies of infected larvae (Singh et al., 2012). 152
A recent paper highlighted the possibility of utilizing cellular miRNAs as a tool to target virus 153
genes as a control strategy (Zhang et al., 2014a). This work was conducted in B. mori against 154
BmNPV using three cellular miRNAs; bmo-miR-279, bmo-miR-92b, and bmo-miR-2764. 155
-
8
Accordingly, the cellular pre-miRNA sequences were used as backbone to replace the natural 156
miRNA duplex sequences with artificial siRNA duplex sequences targeting the viral lef-11 gene, 157
which is involved in virus replication (Zhang et al., 2014a). For this, a virus inducible artificial 158
miRNA (amiRNAs) expression cassette was constructed targeting the viral gene. Infection with the 159
virus stimulates the baculovirus-induced promoter 39K included in the expression cassette leading 160
to production of pre-amiRNA and eventually formation of siRNA duplexes. The mature amiRNAs 161
successfully inhibited BmNPV proliferation by downregulating the lef-11 gene in silkworm BmN-162
SWU1 cells. It will be interesting to see if the approach could be utilized in whole insects to inhibit 163
BmNPV replication without compromising the insect’s fitness. 164
Viruses might also subvert host miRNAs to their own benefit. For example, in American eastern 165
equine encephalitis virus, binding of the mammalian host miR-142-3p to the 3’UTR of the virus 166
genome in myeloid-lineage cells restricts replication of the virus in this particular cell type leading 167
to minimal interferon induction and hence suppression of the host innate immune system (Trobaugh 168
et al., 2013). Interestingly, this study showed that these same binding sites in the virus 3’UTR are 169
also required for efficient infection of the mosquito vector Aedes taeniorhynchus. However, it is not 170
known whether a mosquito miRNA might interact with the sequences facilitating its replication in 171
the insect host similar to the mammalian host. 172
3.1.3 Virus-encoded miRNAs can target host genes 173
Recent investigations have revealed that insect virus miRNAs, similar to those reported from human 174
viruses, might target and regulate host genes to establish infection and successfully replicate. 175
However, the information is very limited in respect to insect viruses. The impact of the miRNA 176
might be via regulation of a specific gene leading to the modification of a particular pathway or 177
might cause a global reduction in the host miRNA depending on the target genes. For example, 178
baculovirus encoded BmNPV-miR-1 downregulates the nuclear Exportin-5 cofactor Ran resulting 179
in the blockage of the export of cellular pre-miRNAs into the cytoplasm generally affecting the 180
abundance of cellular mature miRNAs in infected cells (Singh et al., 2012) (Table 1). This may 181
-
9
affect regulation of cellular as well as viral genes. For instance, predicted targets of four selected 182
host miRNAs affected by downregulation of Ran via BmNPV-miR-1 were mostly related to 183
immunity. In addition, targets of these miRNAs were also predicted in the viral genome. For 184
example, bmo-miR-8, which is downregulated following infection, targets the immediate early-1 185
(ie1) gene (Singh et al., 2012). Downregulation of the miRNA is obviously to the benefit of the 186
virus. However, it remains to be elucidated how viral miRNAs are produced while the host miRNA 187
biogenesis pathway is interrupted. 188
In addition, a WNV (Kunjin strain, WNVKUN) encoded miRNA, KUN-miR-1, derived from the 189
3’SL stem-loop located at the end of the 3’UTR of the virus in mosquito cells positively regulates 190
the host GATA-binding protein 4 (GATA-4) (Hussain et al., 2012) (Table 1). RNAi-mediated 191
silencing of GATA-4 led to a significant reduction in virus RNA replication, suggesting that 192
GATA-4-induction via KUN-miR-1 plays an important role in virus replication. However, the 193
mechanism remains to be explored. Members of the GATA family are transcription factors that 194
regulate various biological processes in insects and vertebrates (Shapira et al., 2006). In particular, 195
GATA-4 has been shown to be involved in regulation of egg development, vitellogenesis, and lipid 196
metabolism in mosquitoes (Cheon et al., 2006; Park et al., 2006). 197
3.1.4. Virus-encoded miRNAs target viral own genes 198
Targeting virus genes by virus-encoded miRNAs appears to be common among different groups of 199
viruses to regulate their own replication, enter latency or suppress host anti-viral responses. The 200
first insect virus-encoded miRNA, HvAV-miR-1, was reported from the ascovirus HvAV-3e 201
originating from the major capsid protein (MCP) gene of the virus (Hussain et al., 2008). The virus-202
encoded miRNA was shown to autoregulate virus replication late in infection by downregulating 203
the virus’s own DNA polymerase (Table 1). In a recent report, it was revealed that BmNPV 204
expresses a miRNA, bmnpv-miR-3, early in infection, which targets and regulates expression of the 205
viral DNA binding protein (P6.9) as well as other late genes (Singh et al., 2014) (Table 1). This may 206
confer several benefits to the virus: (1) autoregulation of virus proliferation to avoid over 207
-
10
replication, (2) regulation of the expression levels of the late genes to suppress their expression 208
early in infection, (3) modulation of the host immune response by regulating virus proliferation. In 209
regards to the latter, the investigators showed that virus load correlates with expression levels of the 210
AMP gloverin, which has been shown to be upregulated upon baculovirus infection and inactivates 211
budded viruses (Moreno-Habel et al., 2012). 212
A miRNA from the baculovirus AcMNPV, AcMNPV-miR-1, was found to be expressed from the 213
negative strand of the viral genome and target ODV-E25 transcripts on the opposite strand with 214
100% complementarity (Zhu et al., 2013) (Table 1). ODV-E25 is a late gene encoding a ∼25 kDa 215
structural protein of occlusion derived virus (ODV) and also found on the budded virus (BV) 216
envelope (Russell and Rohrmann, 1993; Wang et al., 2010). The protein is conserved in 217
baculoviruses that infect lepidopterans and important in ODV formation and BV infectivity (Chen 218
et al., 2012). AcMNPV-miR-1 was expressed late in infection starting from 12 hpi. Bioinformatics 219
analysis identified eight potential targets for AcMNPV-miR-1 in the virus genome with ODV-E25 220
showing 100% complementarity since it is expressed on the complementary strand of the miRNA. 221
Validation experiments confirmed that AcMNPV-miR-1 causes cleavage of ODV-E25 mRNA and 222
its higher expression levels coincided with reduced levels of the target mRNA levels. Notably, 223
using AcMNPV-miR-1 mimic, it was found that the small RNA had no effect on budded virus 224
production but affected their infectivity by reducing production of ODV-E25 (Chen et al., 2012). 225
Furthermore, the mimic increased ODV formation, and inhibition of AcMNPV-miR-1 dramatically 226
reduced the number of occluded ODVs. This implied that the miRNA promotes ODV formation. 227
In another example, a functional viral small RNA (DENV-vsRNA-5) produced from a stem-loop of 228
DENV-2 3’UTR was found in virus-infected Ae. aegypti mosquitoes and cell lines. The vsRNA was 229
shown to target the virus genome at NS1 gene region (Hussain and Asgari, 2014) (Table 1). 230
Synthetic RNA inhibitor or mimic of DENV-vsRNA-5 resulted in significant increases or decrease 231
in viral replication, respectively. The autoregulation of virus replication may facilitate low but 232
transmissible level of virus infection in the mosquito vector. 233
-
11
In a number of vertebrate herpesviruses, it has been shown that virus-encoded miRNAs are 234
important in switching between lytic and latent phases (reviewed in Cullen, 2011). In insect viruses, 235
Heliothis zea nudivirus (HzNV-1) expresses only one non-protein coding gene, the persistency-236
associated gene 1 (pag1), during the latency phase (Wu et al., 2011) (Table 1). Two miRNAs 237
encoded by pag1 were shown to downregulate the viral early gene hhi1, which allows the virus to 238
enter the latent infection stage in cell culture. In the absence of the pag1 gene, the virus does not 239
enter latency phase. It will be interesting to find out whether virus-encoded miRNAs play any role 240
in latency or persistent infection observed in other insect viruses. 241
3.2. Bacterial infection can modulate host miRNAs in insects 242
A number of studies have revealed that similar to viruses bacterial infections can lead to changes in 243
cellular miRNAs in different insect species, with information again being limited. For example, 244
association of the endosymbiotic bacterium Wolbachia (wMelPop strain) with alterations in cellular 245
miRNAs and miRNA pathway proteins in Ae. aegypti has been documented (Hussain et al., 2011; 246
Hussain et al., 2013a; Mayoral et al., 2014; Osei-Amo et al., 2012; Zhang et al., 2013). Of note, this 247
strain causes life-shortening in the mosquito as well as inhibit replication of several vector-borne 248
pathogens especially RNA viruses such as DENV, WNV and Chikungunya virus (Moreira et al., 249
2009a; Moreira et al., 2009b). Initially, microarray analysis revealed that a number of mosquito 250
miRNAs were differentially expressed with two of them, aae-miR-2940 and -309a, showing high 251
abundance in Wolbachia-infected mosquitoes as compared with non-infected ones (Hussain et al., 252
2011). A target sequence of aae-miR-2940 was shown to reside in the 3’UTR of the mosquito’s 253
metalloprotease m41 ftsh transcripts; however, the miRNA was shown to positively regulate the 254
metalloprotease transcript levels. miRNA inhibition and silencing of the target gene revealed that 255
the metalloprotease gene and aae-miR-2940 are important in the maintenance of Wolbachia density 256
(Hussain et al., 2011). In a follow-up study, aae-miR-2940 was found to negatively regulate the 257
transcript levels of its other target, the DNA methyltransferase (AaDnmt2) (Zhang et al., 2013). 258
Overexpression of AaDnmt2 in Wolbachia-infected mosquito cells led to significant reductions in 259
-
12
Wolbachia density, but significantly enhanced replication of DENV. This suggested that 260
downregulation of AaDnmt2 by aae-miR-2940 may contribute to inhibition of DENV replication in 261
Wolbachia-infected mosquitoes. Notably, significant hypomethylation of Ae. aegypti genome was 262
recognized in wMelPop infected mosquitoes (Ye et al., 2013). Given that AaDnmt2 is the only 263
DNA methyltransferase gene in the mosquito’s genome, Wolbachia may epigenetically regulate 264
expression of many host genes by suppression of AaDnmt2 via aae-miR-2940 induction. Further, 265
the instances above provide an example of a miRNA regulating more than one gene in opposite 266
ways, both benefiting the endosymbiotic bacterium. 267
Function of another Wolbachia induced cellular miRNA, aae-miR-12, was confirmed in regulation 268
of two target genes, DNA replication licensing factor MCM6 and monocarboxylate transporter 269
MCT1, and shown to be important for the maintenance of Wolbachia density in mosquito cells 270
(Osei-Amo et al., 2012). Recently, it was uncovered that Wolbachia blocks shuttling of Ago1 to the 271
nucleus through upregulation of aae-miR-981 (Hussain et al., 2013a) and that leads to changes in 272
the distribution of miRNAs in infected cells (Mayoral et al., 2014). Interestingly, this miRNA 273
downregulates expression of importin β-4 that facilitates Ago1 distribution to the nucleus (Hussain 274
et al., 2013a). 275
A study on honeybees (Apis mellifera) showed activation of AMPs and regulation of a large number 276
of immune-related genes in response to infection by the Gram-negative bacterium Serratia 277
marcescens (Lourenco et al., 2013). Analysis of miRNAs from the infected bees also revealed 278
differential expression of cellular miRNAs upon bacterial infection. Among the downregulated 279
miRNAs were ame-bantam, miR-12, -34, -184, -278, -375, -989 and -1175, while some were 280
upregulated such as let-7, miR-2, -13a, and -92a. Predicted interactions revealed that the miRNA 281
could potentially regulate genes involved in Imd, Toll, JNK, and JAK/STAT pathways, regulation 282
of AMPs and melanization. However, functional analysis and validation of these interactions 283
remain to be investigated. 284
285
-
13
286
4. Role of miRNAs in regulation of insect immunity 287
Despite many reports demonstrating the role of miRNAs in vertebrate immunity, the information 288
pertinent to their role in insect immunity is scant and mostly based on bioinformatics predictions or 289
correlating miRNA abundance with that of mRNAs. For example, Fullaondo et al. identified over 290
70 miRNAs that could be involved in regulating immune related pathways such as Toll, Imd and 291
JAK/STAT, melanization and JNK pathways using bioinformatics approaches (Fullaond and Lee, 292
2012). Similarly, a computational approach was used to identify Anopheles gambiae miRNAs that 293
may be involved in regulating immune responses. Two miRNAs, aga-miR-2304 and aga-miR-2390, 294
were predicted to target the genes encoding suppressin and prophenoloxidase 295
(Thirugnanasambantham et al., 2013). However, these predictions await experimental confirmation 296
of miRNA-target interactions. In the flour beetle Tribolium castaneum, microbial challenge and 297
stress led to alteration of the beetle’s miRNA profile (Freitak et al., 2012). Induction of immunity 298
by injection of peptidoglycan into the beetles resulted in differential expression of 59 miRNAs from 299
which 21 were upregulated. Similarly, changes in the abundance of Manduca sexta miRNAs were 300
observed following immune challenge involved in pattern recognition, activation of 301
prophenoloxidase, synthesis of AMPs and conserved immune signal transduction pathways (Zhang 302
et al., 2014b). In An. gambiae, the possibility of involvement of miRNAs in defence against 303
Plasmodium berghei invasion was demonstrated as Dicer-1 and Ago1 depletion in the mosquitoes 304
led to increased sensitivity of the mosquitoes to P. berghei infection (Winter et al., 2007). However, 305
no specific miRNA was identified responsible for the effect observed. 306
One of the miRNAs whose role in insect immunity has experimentally been established is miR-8 307
which negatively regulates expression of the AMPs, such as Drosomycin and Diptericin, in D. 308
melanogaster (Choi and Hyun, 2012). This allows maintenance of low level of AMPs expression 309
under non-infection conditions, enabling the homeostasis of immunity. However, in miR-8 null 310
Drosophila, the transcript levels of the AMPs significantly increased; although it was not shown 311
-
14
how miR-8 regulates AMPs. It was predicted that the miRNA could potentially target the transcripts 312
of Gram-negative binding protein 3 (GNBP3), an inducer of the Toll pathway upon fungal 313
infection, and Pvf, a modulator of the JNK pathway. Negative regulation of AMPs by miR-8 was 314
also demonstrated in the larvae of Plutella xylostella (Etebari and Asgari, 2013). This study further 315
showed that miR-8 positively regulates the transcript levels of serpin-27, inhibiting activation of the 316
Toll pathway and hence low level of production of AMPs when there is no infection/parasitization. 317
Upon infection, miR-8 levels are reduced leading to a decrease in serpin-27 levels and consequently 318
activation of the Toll pathway. 319
In Aedes albopictus (C6/36) cells, the abundance of the mosquito-specific aae-miR-2940 was 320
shown to be selectively reduced following WNVKUN infection, a flavivirus (Slonchak et al., 2014). 321
As indicated above, aae-miR-2940 positively regulates the metalloprotease ftsh in mosquitoes 322
(Hussain et al., 2011), and this protein was found to enhance WNVKUN replication (Slonchak et al., 323
2014). Reduced aae-miR-2940 levels led to lower metalloprotease levels and consequently reduced 324
virus titers. This suggested that reduction in the miRNA levels might be an anti-viral response to 325
WNV infection. Similarly, reduced levels of aae-miR-2940 were detected in Ae. albopictus Singh’s 326
cell line infected with Chikungunya virus, an alphavirus (Shrinet et al., 2014). These results suggest 327
that reduced levels of aae-miR-2940 might be a common response to viral infection. 328
In Ae. aegypti, two immune related genes, cactus and REL1, were found to be the target of a blood 329
meal induced miRNA, aae-miR-375 (Hussain et al., 2013b). Interestingly, cactus, which is an 330
inhibitor of the Toll pathway, was positively regulated by aae-miR-375, whereas REL1, which is an 331
activator of AMPs, was downregulated by the same miRNA. The increase in cactus and decrease in 332
REL1 was found to have a positive effect on DENV replication since AMPs have been shown to 333
negatively affect DENV (Luplertlop et al., 2012; Xia et al., 2008). Coincidence of negative 334
regulation of AMPs upon blood feeding may provide a fitness advantage for the virus. 335
Finally, it is well-known that immune related genes evolve faster than non-immune genes due to 336
constant evolutionarily pressures on hosts to neutralize pathogen novelties. Interestingly, when 337
-
15
analysing 50 genes involved in the Drosophila Toll and Imd signalling pathways, Han et al realized 338
a strong negative correlation between the rate of evolution of the immune proteins and the number 339
of their regulatory miRNAs, suggesting that genes regulated by more miRNAs evolve slower due to 340
stronger functional constraints (Han et al., 2013). This suggests the role of miRNAs in the evolution 341
of immune related genes in insects. 342
5. Conclusions 343
In the last decade, we have witnessed major developments in our understanding of the biogenesis 344
and the function of miRNAs in various aspects of insect biology. Most of these efforts have focused 345
on the role of miRNAs in development with the main focus on D. melanogaster. Recently, there 346
have been a number of publications on the role of these small RNAs in host-pathogen interactions. 347
As an initial step towards understanding their role in the interactions, the majority of investigators 348
have focused on the effect of infection on the host miRNA profile with several being identified as 349
differentially abundant miRNAs. It is of great interest to see these efforts to be followed up by 350
empirical approaches to demonstrate the functional role of these differentially abundant miRNAs in 351
host-pathogen interactions and insect immunity. In addition, a number of virus-encoded miRNAs 352
have been characterized that either regulate virus replication or modulate host genes/miRNAs to 353
facilitate their replication. 354
Extending research on miRNAs beyond scientific curiosity and basic research to utilize them in 355
applied insect biology with the aim to reduce crop damage by agricultural pests, inhibit mortality in 356
beneficial insects and inhibit/limit transmission of vector-borne pathogens should be considered as 357
future prospects. However, these efforts may encounter regulatory limitations when their 358
applications are to extend to the field arena since genetic manipulations of insects or plants are most 359
likely inevitable. Some attempts have already been made in this area with promising results either in 360
cell culture or at the laboratory scale. miRNA research is certainly a very fast moving area of 361
research and we shall see a strong progress in this field in the near future. 362
363
-
16
364
Acknowledgements 365
The authors would like to acknowledge Dr Karyn Johnson from the University of Queensland for 366
critically reading this review. The authors would like to acknowledge the Australian Research 367
Council (DP110102112, DE120101512) and National Health and Medical Research (APP1062983, 368
APP1027110) for providing funding that contributed to some of the findings reported in this review 369
from our lab. 370
References 371
Abe, M., Naqvi, A., Hendriks, G., Feltzin, V., Zhu, Y., Grigoriev, A., Bonini, N., 2014. Impact of 372 age-associated increase in 2'-O-methylation of miRNAs on aging and neurodegeneration in 373 Drosophila. Genes Dev. 28, 44-57. 374
Agaisse, H., Perrimon, N., 2004. The roles of JAK/STAT signaling in Drosophila immune 375 responses. Immunol. Rev. 198, 72-82. 376
Bronkhorst, A.W., van Rij R.P., 2014. The long and short of antiviral defense: small RNA-based 377 immunity in insects. Curr. Opi. Virol. 7C:19-28. 378
Bulet, P., Hetru, C., Dimarcq, J.L., Hoffmann, D., 1999. Antimicrobial peptides in insects; structure 379 and function. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 23, 329–344. 380
Campbell, C.L., Harrison, T., Hess, A.M., Ebel, G.D., 2013. MicroRNA levels are modulated in 381 Aedes aegypti after exposure to Dengue-2. Insect Mol. Biol. 23, 132-139. 382
Chen, L., Hu, X., Xiang, X., Yu, S., Yang, R., Wu, X., 2012. Autographa californica multiple 383 nucleopolyhedrovirus odv-e25 (Ac94) is required for budded virus infectivity and occlusion-384 derived virus formation. Arch. Virol. 157, 617-625. 385
Cheon, H.M., Shin, S.W., Bian, G., Park, J.H., Raikhel, A.S., 2006. Regulation of lipid metabolism 386 genes, lipid carrier protein lipophorin, and its receptor during immune challenge in the 387 mosquito Aedes aegypti. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 8426-8435. 388
Choi, I.K., Hyun, S., 2012. Conserved microRNA miR-8 in fat body regulates innate immune 389 homeostasis in Drosophila. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 37, 50-54. 390
Cullen, B.R., 2011. Herpesvirus microRNAs: phenotypes and functions. Curr. Opin. Virol. 1, 211-391 215. 392
Dostert, C., Jouanguy, E., Irving, P., Troxler, L., Galiana-Arnoux, D., Hetru, C., Hoffmann, J.A., 393 Imler, J.L., 2005. The Jak–STAT signaling pathway is required but not sufficient for the 394 antiviral response of Drosophila. Nat. Immunol. 6, 946–953. 395
Dushay, M.S., 2009. Insect hemolymph clotting. Cell Mol Life Sci 66, 2643-2650. 396 El Chamy, L., Leclerc, V., Caldelari, I., Reichhart, J.M., 2008. Sensing of ‘danger signals’ and 397
pathogen associated molecular patterns defines binary signaling pathways ’upstream’ of Toll. 398 Nat. Immunol. 9, 1165-1170. 399
Etebari, K., Asgari, S., 2013. Conserved microRNA miR-8 blocks activation of the Toll pathway by 400 up-regulating Serpin 27 transcripts. RNA Biol. 10, 1356-1364. 401
Freitak, D., Knorr, E., Vogel, H., Vilcinskas, A., 2012. Gender- and stressor-specific microRNA 402 expression in Tribolium castaneum. Biol. Lett. 8, 860-863. 403
Fullaond, A., Lee, S.Y., 2012. Identification of putative miRNA involved in Drosophila 404 melanogaster immune response. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 36, 267-273. 405
-
17
Gangloff, M., Murali, A., Xiong, J., Arnot, C.J., Weber, A.N., Sandercock, A.M., Robinson, C.V., 406 Sarisky, R., Holzenburg, A., Kao, C., Gay, N.J., 2008. Structural insight into the mechanism of 407 activation of the Toll receptor by the dimeric ligand Spätzle. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 14629–14635. 408
Ghildiyal, M., Xu, J., Seitz, H., Weng, Z., Zamore, P.D., 2010. Sorting of Drosophila small 409 silencing RNAs partitions microRNA* strands into the RNA interference pathway. RNA 16, 410 43-56. 411
Gottar, M., Gobert, V., Matskevich, A.A., Reichhart, J.M., Wang, C., Butt, T.M., Belvin, M., 412 Hoffmann, J.A., Ferrandon, D., 2006. Dual detection of fungal infections in Drosophila via 413 recognition of glucans and sensing of virulence factors. Cell 127, 1425-1437. 414
Han, M., Qin, S., Song, X., Li, Y., Jin, P., Chen, L., Ma, F., 2013. Evolutionary rate patterns of 415 genes involved in the Drosophila Toll and Imd signaling pathway. BMC Evol Biol 13, 245. 416
Hussain, M., Asgari, S., 2010. Functional analysis of a cellular microRNA in insect host-ascovirus 417 interaction. J. Virol. 84, 612-620. 418
Hussain, M., Asgari, S., 2014. MicroRNA-like viral small RNA from Dengue virus 2 autoregulates 419 its replication in mosquito cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 2746–2751. 420
Hussain, M., Frentiu, F., Moreira, L., O’Neill, S., Asgari, S., 2011. Wolbachia utilizes host 421 microRNAs to manipulate host gene expression and facilitate colonization of the dengue vector 422 Aedes aegypti. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 9250-9255. 423
Hussain, M., O'Neill, S.L., Asgari, S., 2013a. Wolbachia interferes with the intracellular 424 distribution of Argonaute 1 in the dengue vector Aedes aegypti by manipulating the host 425 microRNAs. RNA Biol. 10, 1868-1875. 426
Hussain, M., Taft, R.J., Asgari, S., 2008. An insect virus-encoded microRNA regulates viral 427 replication. J. Virol. 82, 9164–9170. 428
Hussain, M., Torres, S., Schnettler, E., Funk, A., Grundhoff, A., Pijlman, G.P., Khromykh, A.A., 429 Asgari, S., 2012. West Nile virus encodes a microRNA-like small RNA in the 3' untranslated 430 region which up-regulates GATA4 mRNA and facilitates virus replication in mosquito cells 431 Nucleic Acids Res. 40, 2210-2223. 432
Hussain, M., Walker, T., O’Neill, S., Asgari, S., 2013b. Blood meal induced microRNA regulates 433 development and immune associated genes in the Dengue mosquito vector, Aedes aegypti. 434 Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 43, 146-152. 435
Jayachandran, B., Hussain, M., Asgari, S., 2013. Regulation of Helicoverpa armigera ecdysone 436 receptor by miR-14 and its potential link to baculovirus infection. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 114, 437 151-157. 438
Jiravanichpaisal, P., Lee, B.L., Soderhall, K., 2006. Cell-mediated immunity in arthropods: 439 hematopoiesis, coagulation, melanization and opsonization. Immunobiology 211, 213-236. 440
Kaneko, T., Yano, T., Aggarwal, K., Lim, J.H., Ueda, K., Oshima, Y., Peach, C., Erturk-Hasdemir, 441 D., Goldman, W.E., Oh, B.H., Kurata, S., Silverman, N., 2006. PGRP-LC and PGRP-LE have 442 essential yet distinct functions in the Drosophila immune response to monomeric DAP-type 443 peptidoglycan. Nat. Immunol. 7, 715-723. 444
Lee, R.C., Feinbaum, R.L., Ambros, V., 1993. The C. elegans heterochronic gene lin-4 encodes 445 small RNAs with antisense complimentarity to lin-14. Cell 75, 843-854. 446
Ligoxygakis, P., Pelte, N., Hoffmann, J.A., Reichhart, J.M., 2002. Activation of Drosophila Toll 447 during fungal infection by a blood serine protease. Science 297, 114-116. 448
Liu, S., Gao, S., Zhang, D., Yin, J., Xiang, Z., Xia, Q., 2010. MicroRNAs show diverse and 449 dynamic expression patterns in multiple tissues of Bombyx mori. BMC Genomics 11, 85. 450
Lourenco, A.P., Guidugli-Lazzarini, K.R., Freitas, F.C.P., Bitondi, M.M.G., Simoes, Z.L.P., 2013. 451 Bacterial infection activates the immune system response and dysregulates microRNA 452 expression in honey bees. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 43, 474-482. 453
Luplertlop, N., Surasombatpattana, P., Patramool, S., Dumas, E., Wasinpiyamongkol, L., Saune, L., 454 Hamel, R., Bernard, E., Sereno, D., Thomas, F., Piquemal, D., Yssel, H., Briant, L., Misse, D., 455 2012. Induction of a peptide with activity against a broad spectrum of pathogens in the Aedes 456 aegypti salivary gland, following infection with dengue virus. PLoS Pathog. 7, e1001252. 457
-
18
Mayoral, J.G., Etebari, K., Hussain, M., Khromykh, A.A., Asgari, S., 2014. Wolbachia infection 458 modifies the profile, shuttling and structure of microRNAs in a mosquito cell line. PLoS ONE 459 9, e96107. 460
Mehrabadi, M., Hussain, M., Asgari, S., 2013. MicroRNAome of Spodoptera frugiperda cells (Sf9) 461 and its alteration following baculovirus infection. J. Gen. Virol. 94, 1385–1397. 462
Moreira, L.A., Iturbe-Ormaetxe, I., Jeffery, J.A., Lu, G.J., Pyke, A.T., Hedges, L.M., Rocha, B.C., 463 Hall-Mendelin, S., Day, A., Riegler, M., Hugo, L.E., Johnson, K.N., Kay, B.H., McGraw, E.A., 464 van den Hurk, A.F., Ryan, P.A., O'Neill, S.L., 2009a. A Wolbachia symbiont in Aedes aegypti 465 limits infection with Dengue, Chikungunya, and Plasmodium. Cell 139, 1268-1278. 466
Moreira, L.A., Saig, E., Turley, A.P., Ribeiro, J.M.C., O'Neill, S.L., McGraw, E.A., 2009b. Human 467 probing behavior of Aedes aegypti when infected with a life-shortening strain of Wolbachia. 468 Plos Neglect. Trop. Dis. 3, e568. 469
Moreno-Habel, D., Biglang-awa, I., Dulce, A., Luu, D., Garcia, P., Weers, P., Haas-Stapleton, E., 470 2012. Inactivation of the budded virus of Autographa californica M nucleopolyhedrovirus by 471 gloverin. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 110, 92-101. 472
Osei-Amo, S., Hussain, M., O’Neill, S.L., Asgari, S., 2012. Wolbachia-induced aae-miR-12 473 miRNA negatively regulated the expression of MCT1 and MCM6 genes in Wolbachia-infected 474 mosquito cell line. PLoS ONE 7, e50049. 475
Paradkar, P.N., Trinidad, L., Voysey, R., Duchemin, J.B., Walker, P.J., 2012. Secreted Vago 476 restricts West Nile virus infection in Culex mosquito cells by activating the Jak-STAT pathway. 477 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 18915–18920. 478
Park, J.H., Attardo, G.M., Hansen, I.A., Raikhel, A.S., 2006. GATA factor translation is the final 479 downstream step in the amino acid/target-of-rapamycin-mediated vitellogenin gene expression 480 in the anautogenous mosquito Aedes aegypti. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 11167-11176. 481
Rubio, M., Belles, X., 2013. Subtle roles of microRNAs let-7, miR-100 and miR-125 on wing 482 morphogenesis in hemimetabolan metamorphosis. J. Insect Physiol. 59, 1089-1094. 483
Russell, R., Rohrmann, G., 1993. A 25-kDa protein is associated with the envelopes of occluded 484 baculovirus virions. Virology 195, 532–540. 485
Sabin, L.R., Cherry, S., 2013. Small creatures use small RNAs to direct antiviral defenses. Eur. J. 486 Immunol. 43, 27-33. 487
Shapira, M., Hamlin, B.J., Rong, J., Chen, K., Ronen, M., Tan, M.W., 2006. A conserved role for a 488 GATA transcription factor in regulating epithelial innate immune responses. Proc. Natl. Acad. 489 Sci. USA 103, 14086-14091. 490
Shrinet, J., Jain, S., Jain, J., Bhatnagar, R., S, S., 2014. Next generation sequencing reveals 491 regulation of distinct Aedes microRNAs during chikungunya virus development. PLoS Negl. 492 Trop. Dis. 8, e2616. 493
Singh, C.P., Singh, J., Nagaraju, J., 2012. A baculovirus-encoded microRNA (miRNA) suppresses 494 its host miRNA biogenesis by regulating the exportin-5 cofactor Ran. J. Virol. 86, 7867–7879. 495
Singh, C.P., Singh, J., Nagaraju, J., 2014. bmnpv-miR-3 facilitates BmNPV infection 1 by 496 modulating the 2 expression of viral P6.9 and other late genes in Bombyx mori. Insect Biochem. 497 Mol. Biol. 49, 59-69. 498
Skalsky, R.L., Vanlandingham, D.L., Scholle, F., Higgs, S., Cullen, B.R., 2010. Identification of 499 microRNAs expressed in two mosquito vectors, Aedes albopictus and Culex quinquefasciatus. 500 BMC Genomics 11, 119. 501
Slonchak, A., Hussain, M., Morales, S., Asgari, S., Khromykh, A., 2014. Expression of mosquito 502 microRNA aae-miR-2940-5p is down-regulated in response to West Nile Virus infection to 503 restrict viral replication. J. Virol. DOI: 10.1128/JVI.00317-14. 504
Tauszig-Delamasure, S., Bilak, H., Capovilla, M., Hoffmann, J.A., Imler, J.L., 2002. Drosophila 505 MyD88 is required for the response to fungal and Gram positive bacterial infections. Nat. 506 Immunol. 3, 91-97. 507
-
19
Thirugnanasambantham, K., Hairul-Islam, V., Saravanan, S., Subasri, S., Subastri, A., 2013. 508 Computational approach for identification of Anopheles gambiae miRNA involved in 509 modulation of host immune response. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 170, 281-291. 510
Towb, P., Bergmann, A., Wasserman, S.A., 2001. The protein kinase Pelle mediates feedback 511 regulation in the Drosophila Toll signaling pathway. Development 128, 4729–4736. 512
Trobaugh, D., Gardner, C., Sun, C., Haddow, A., Wang, E., Chapnik, E., Mildner, A., Weaver, S., 513 Ryman, K., Klimstra, W., 2013. RNA viruses can hijack vertebrate microRNAs to suppress 514 innate immunity. Nature 506, 245-248. 515
Wang, R., Deng, F., Hou, D., Zhao, Y., Guo, L., Wang, H., Hu, Z., 2010. Proteomics of the 516 Autographa californica nucleopolyhedrovirus budded virions. J. Virol. 84, 7233–7242. 517
Weber, A.N., Tauszig-Delamasure, S., Hoffmann, J.A., Lelie`vre, E., Gascan, H., Ray, K.P., 518 Morse, M.A., Imler, J.L., Gay, N.J., 2003. Binding of the Drosophila cytokine Spätzle to Toll is 519 direct and establishes signaling. Nat. Immunol. 4, 794-800. 520
Winter, F., Edaye, S., Hu¨ ttenhofer, A., Brunel, C., 2007. Anopheles gambiae miRNAs as actors of 521 defence reaction against Plasmodium invasion. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, 6953–6962. 522
Wu, P., Han, S., Chen, T., Qin, G., Li, L., Guo, X., 2013. Involvement of microRNAs in infection 523 of silkworm with Bombyx mori cytoplasmic polyhedrosis virus (BmCPV). PLoS ONE 8, 524 e68209. 525
Wu, Y.L., Wu, C.P., Liu, C.Y., Hsu, P.W., Wu, E.C., Chao, Y.C., 2011. A non-coding RNA of 526 insect HzNV-1 virus establishes latent viral infection through microRNA. Sci. Rep. 1, 60. 527
Xia, T., O’Hara, A., Araujo, I., Barreto, J., Carvalho, E., Sapucaia, J.B., Ramos, J.C., Luz, E., 528 Pedroso, C., Manrique, M., Toomey, N.L., Brites, C., Dittmer, D.P., Harrington Jr., W.J., 2008. 529 EBV microRNAs in primary lymphomas and targeting of CXCL-11 by ebv-mir-BHRF1–3. 530 Cancer Res. 68, 1436–1442. 531
Ye, Y.H., Woolfit, M., Huttley, G.A., Rancès, E., Caragata, E.P., Popovici, J., O'Neill, S.L., 532 McGraw, E.A., 2013. Infection with a virulent strain of Wolbachia disrupts genome wide-533 patterns of cytosine methylation in the mosquito Aedes aegypti. PLoS ONE 8, e66482. 534
Zhang, G., Hussain, M., O’Neill, S., Asgari, S., 2013. Wolbachia uses a host microRNA to regulate 535 transcripts of a methyltransferase, contributing to dengue virus inhibition in Aedes aegypti. 536 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 10276-10281. 537
Zhang, J., He, Q., Zhang, C.-D., Chen, X.-Y., Chen, X.-M., Dong, Z.-Q., Li, N., Kuang, X.-X., 538 Cao, M.-Y., Lu, C., Pan, M.-H., 2014a. Inhibition of BmNPV replication in silkworm cells 539 using inducible and regulated artificial microRNA precursors targeting the essential viral gene 540 lef-11. Antiviral Res. 104, 143-152. 541
Zhang, X., Zheng, Y., Jagadeeswaran, G., Ren, R., Sunkar, R., Jiang, H., 2014b. Identification of 542 conserved and novel microRNAs in Manduca sexta and their possible roles in the expression 543 regulation of immunity-related genes. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 47, 12-22. 544
Zhu, M., Wang, J., Deng, R., Xiong, P., Liang, H., Wang, X., 2013. A microRNA encoded by 545 Autographa californica nucleopolyhedrovirus regulates expression of viral gene ODV-E25. J. 546 Virol. 87, 13029-13034. 547
-
20
Table 1. miRNAs encoded in viral genomes that target viral own or host transcripts. 548
549 Virus miRNA and its
origin Target in viral/host
genome Effect on virus
infection Reference
DNA virus Heliothis virescens
ascovirus (HvAV3e)
HvAV-miR-1 is derived from MCP
Downregulates DNA polymerase 1
limits viral DNA replication during late infection
(Hussain et al., 2008)
Heliothis zea nudivirus (HzNV-1)
hv-miR-246 and -2959 from pag-1 gene
Both miRNAs target hhi1 transcript
help virus to enter latent phase
(Wu et al., 2011)
Bombyx mori nucleopolyhedrovirus (BmNPV)
BmNPV-miR-1 downregulates Exportin-5 cofactor Ran resulting in the blockage of pre-miRNA export into the cytoplasm
(Singh et al., 2012)
BmNPV
bmnpv-miR-3 is derived from the plus strand early in infection
targets 3′UTR of BmNPV DNA binding protein (P6.9) mRNA that transcribes from the opposite strand at the same locus
helps virus to escape the early immune response from the host
(Singh et al., 2014)
Autographa californica nucleopolyhedrovirus (AcMNPV)
AcMNPV-miR-1 is located on the negative strand of the core gene ODV-E25
downregulates ODV-E25 mRNA on positive strand
results in a reduction of infectious budded virions and accelerates the formation of occlusion-derived virions
(Zhu et al., 2013)
RNA virus Dengue virus-2
(DENV-2) DENV-vsRNA-5 is produced from a stem-loop in the 3’UTR of DENV-2
NS1 gene region Autoregulates viral replication late in infection
(Hussain and Asgari, 2014)
West Nile virus (Kunjin strain, WNVKUN)
KUN-miR-1 is derived from the 3’SL located at the end of the 3’UTR
Targets and induces transcript level of cellular GATA-4 transcription factor
Enhances viral RNA replication
(Hussain et al., 2012)
550
-
21
Figure legend: 551
Figure 1: Canonical pathway of miRNA biogenesis. miRNA genes are transcribed in the nucleus 552
mostly by RNA polymerase II in the form of primary miRNA (pri-miRNA) that contains one or 553
more stem-loop structures, and similar to mRNAs it is 5’capped and polyadenylated. The stem-loop 554
is cleaved from pri-miRNA by Drosha in association with Pasha to form the precursor miRNA (pre-555
miRNA which is then transported into the cytoplasm facilitated by Exportin-5/Ran. The hairpin 556
head is removed either by Dicer-1 or Ago2 resulting in a miRNA duplex which initiates the 557
formation of the RNA induced silencing complex (RISC). One of the strands in usually degraded 558
(miRNA*) and the other strand guides the miR-RISC complex to target mRNA (posttranscriptional 559
regulation) or transported into the nucleus where it binds to a promoter region and regulate gene 560
transcription (transcriptional gene regulation, TGR). The miRNA* may also be loaded into one of 561
the Ago proteins and perform a function by interacting with target sequences. The outcome of 562
miRNA-target interaction may vary from mRNA degradation, translational repression to 563
upregulation of target transcript levels. 564
565
-
566
567
-
Graphical abstract
AAAAA
5’ cap
Ago2 TRBP
AAAA 5' cap pri-miRNA
Drosha
Pasha pre-miRNA
Exportin-5
miRNA duplex
Dicer-1
miR-RISC
miR*-RISC
TGR
RNA Pol II
AAAAA
5’ cap
nucleus
cytoplasm
-
24
Highlights 572
•••• MiRNAs are small non-coding RNAs that regulate gene expression. 573 •••• Following infection, miRNA profile of the host is altered either due to defence or manipulation by the 574
pathogen. 575 •••• Virus-encoded miRNAs regulate host or viral genes facilitating establishment of infection. 576 577
578