Inkster, Michigan Census Profile 2010 by Data Driven Detroit
Michigan Early On Part C Data Collection Profile Report
description
Transcript of Michigan Early On Part C Data Collection Profile Report
Michigan Early On Part C Data Collection Profile Report
Originally held February 26, 2014Rebroadcast March 12, 2014
Presented byAllan Knapp, PhD
Michigan Part C Data ManagerEarly On® Training and Technical
Assistance
Today’s ContentsExplanation of terms used in the Data Profiles
(e.g. Percent, %Change, Rank)Description of the CALCULATIONS used for the
Data Profiles (this will be an update of last August’s webinar at EOTTA site)
Availability of Data Profiles◦See June 2010 through June 2013 NOW at
www.earlyondata.com ◦Fall 2013 should be available in March; we will have a
follow up webinar thenQuestion and Answer interspersed and at the end
3/12/2014 EOTTA Data Profiles Webinar 2
Early On Data Group ListservThe listserv uses Yahoo Groups; all you need
to do is check “listserv only”To join, you need to be invited; for an
invitation, send an email to Allan Knapp [email protected] or call ◦ (517) 485-8181
If you received an email from the [email protected] on behalf of Allan Knapp on Wednesday March 5, then you are effectively on the listserv
3/12/2014 EOTTA Data Profiles Webinar 3
Finding MSDS InformationGo to www.michigan.gov/CEPIChoose the CEPI Applications
option on the leftThen choose the Michigan
Student Data System (MSDS) option
OR Go to http://
www.michigan.gov/cepi/0,4546,7-113-986_50502---,00.html
3/12/2014 EOTTA Data Profiles Webinar 4
EXPLANATION OF TERMS
3/12/2014 EOTTA Data Profiles Webinar 5
Main Page Information - 1H H H B gHChoose between State and Service Area
profiles in left dropdownChoose collections back to June 2010 in right
dropdownCounts come from data provided by Service
AreaCounts of 5 or less (oops) are “masked” with ** Explanation is repeated at bottom
3/12/2014 EOTTA Data Profiles Webinar 6
Main Page Information - 2HHHBgG
Percent for snapshot, period, Age counts are “percent served” based on MI birth data
Percent for other variables are percent for a specific code within the variable (e.g. see SETTING)
Ranks are done with 1 for LARGEST percent and 56 for smallest. Ties are settled by larger number of children served, then by lowest ISD code.
Print by clicking Print Report in upper right corner3/12/2014 EOTTA Data Profiles Webinar 7
State View – Top Portion
3/12/2014 EOTTA Data Profiles Webinar 8
No ranks for State
Ind 6 value
Ind 5 value
State View – Middle Portion
3/12/2014 EOTTA Data Profiles Webinar 9
No ranks for State
Ind 6 value
Ind 5 value
State View – Bottom Portion
3/12/2014 EOTTA Data Profiles Webinar 10
No ranks for State
Ind 6 value
Ind 5 value
Indicators – light yellow highlight, with Target value appendedIndicator 6 – Child Find Birth-3, target 2.70%Indicator 5 – Child Find Birth-1, target 1.24%Indicator 2 – Setting in Natural Environment,
target 93.00%Indicator 1 – Timely Start of Service, Target
100%Indicator 7 – Timely Initial IFSP, Target 100%Indicator 8a – Timely Transition Plan, Target
100%Indicator 8c – Timely Transition Conference,
Target 100%
3/12/2014 EOTTA Data Profiles Webinar 11
Indicators – usageIndicators 2, 5, and 6 have been and will
be used for Federal Child Count submissions, APR, and Public Reporting
Indicators 1, 7, 8a, and 8c are reported in the Data Profiles the way the data come through the MSDS data system◦ Indicators 1,7,8a,and 8c are all 100%
required variables◦ If you have 0.0% on any required variable,
something is wrong with your SIS1,7,8a,8c from MSDS will be used for
CIMS and Public Reporting eventually
3/12/2014 EOTTA Data Profiles Webinar 12
Masking (5 or less, **)Smaller Service Areas have more
masked values. Profile Heading (see slide 6)
needs to be corrected – it currently says “less than 5”; it should be “5 or less”
Masking is done for FERPA reasons
3/12/2014 EOTTA Data Profiles Webinar 13
Birth CountsPrior to Fall 2012, birth counts by
County were converted to counts by ISD using names (e.g. add Marquette and Alger county counts to get Marquette-Alger ISD count)
Starting Fall 2012, now using 2010 census County and ISD counts for ratios and “geocoding” to identify the county where each birth mother resides.
Three years’ births for Snapshot denominator; four years for Period
3/12/2014 EOTTA Data Profiles Webinar 14
Anachronism – something from a different period of timePeriod Change displays the count
change and percent change in Cumulative Counts between collections.
6mon, 12mon, 18mon was more accurate when collections were Dec 1 and June 1; now should be prior collection; two collections earlier; three collections ago
Value was greater when Period count was part of the Funding Formula Allocation
3/12/2014 EOTTA Data Profiles Webinar 15
Percent Change (far right column)The COUNT from this collection is compared to
the count from the immediately prior collection. Calculation: 100*(this count-last count)/last count
The immediately prior collection is named.If there is no value in either the current or the
prior collection, “n/a” is assigned.Negative change (in red) means the number
decreased. Positive change (black) means an increase.
The Percent Change is not useful when either the starting or ending number is negative (e.g. see the Period Change in slide 18)
3/12/2014 EOTTA Data Profiles Webinar 16
RankingsNo rankings are assigned in State Data ProfileRanks are done with one for LARGEST percent and
56 for smallest. Ties are settled by larger number of children served, then by lowest ISD code.
Often a rank <7 or >50 is an “outlier” – it is different from most districts and should be examined◦ 100% for Required Indicators is not an “outlier”
We are working on a new report that will present all 56 Service Areas plus the State, in rank order. This may help you see who is doing well in some area where you need improvement. See next screen for example
3/12/2014 EOTTA Data Profiles Webinar 17
Sample Ranking Listisd Total Seelig SeeligPer SeeligRnk23 3 3 100.00 150 820 649 79.15 256 97 69 71.13 338 148 105 70.95 435 23 16 69.57 513 93 62 66.67 641 715 471 65.87 779 47 30 63.83 832 33 20 60.61 934 128 74 57.81 1030 90 50 55.56 1121 80 42 52.50 1259 64 33 51.56 1382 1246 631 50.64 1428 160 78 48.75 1509 91 42 46.15 1603 95 42 44.21 1739 227 100 44.05 1862 46 20 43.48 1963 688 269 39.10 2046 102 38 37.25 2158 124 46 37.10 2273 205 73 35.61 2361 171 60 35.09 2480 144 47 32.64 2583 81 26 32.10 2674 129 41 31.78 2744 72 22 30.56 2815 61 18 29.51 2929 84 24 28.57 3070 396 113 28.54 31
3/12/2014 EOTTA Data Profiles Webinar 18
Rank
Percent
Specific Service Area view - Top
3/12/2014 EOTTA Data Profiles Webinar 19
Specific Service Area view - Middle
3/12/2014 EOTTA Data Profiles Webinar 20
Specific Service Area view - Bottom
3/12/2014 EOTTA Data Profiles Webinar 21
Snapshot CountThe snapshot count will equal
◦Sum of ‘Age<1’ plus ‘Age 1-2’ plus ‘Age 2-3’◦All the ethnic counts◦All the Setting counts◦All the Service Coordinator counts
The snapshot count is the denominator for ◦The Males percent◦The Special Ed Eligible percent◦All the percents in the Ethnic, Setting,
Service Coordinator and Age sections
3/12/2014 EOTTA Data Profiles Webinar 22
Period CountThe period count will equal
◦Sum of Snapshot plus TOTAL EXITS◦All the Timely Start of Service counts
3/12/2014 EOTTA Data Profiles Webinar 23
Explanation of Calculations
3/12/2014 EOTTA Data Profiles Webinar 24
Early On Data Field Flow
3/12/2014 EOTTA Data Profiles Webinar 25
ServiceArea A
ServiceArea B
ServiceArea C
MSDSCollections
(child level)
Early On PlatinumFile(child level)
Federal Tables(state level)
APR(state level)
Public Reports(Service Area Level)
CIMS / Determinations(Service Area Level)
WSU AssessmentAnalysis(Service Area and State Levels)
DEF..
MSDS Rules
Platinum File Rules
ProcessingRules
Data Portraits(Service AreaAnd State Levels)
Countability RulesA child is countable on count date
if◦Child’s birth date is prior to the count
date◦Child is less than three years old on
the count date◦CurrentIFSP is on or prior to the count
date◦Current IFSP is within one year of the
count date◦PartCExitDate is blank
3/12/2014 EOTTA Data Profiles Webinar 26
Deduplication RulesUIC is the main criterion
◦Only one record per UIC in federal counts◦In State count:
Only one record per UIC in snapshot count Only one record per UIC/Service Area combo in
period count State level cumulative count can have the same
UIC in multiple Service Areas (at most one in snapshot)
What happens when there is more than one allowable, countable record for a UIC?◦ These tie breaker rules worked well for Fall 2013:
First pick the most recent CurrentIFSPDate Then choose Special Ed eligibility over not
3/12/2014 EOTTA Data Profiles Webinar 27
Processing Rules DefinitionsValues – lists the possible MSDS
valuesPopulation – describes the
records that will be used in evaluating the given indicator
SIS Responsibility – federal and state expectations for reported values
Calculation – how the indicator value is determined from the data received 3/12/2014 EOTTA Data Profiles Webinar 28
Processing Rules – Indicators 2(setting), 5 and 6 (child counts)Values:
◦Ind2: 31 and 41 are good, 38 (other) is badPopulation: subsets of the snapshot count
◦Ind 2: select all snapshot children◦Ind 5: select snapshot children under the age
of one◦Ind 6: select all snapshot children
SIS: accurate birth, setting, IFSP date, ExitInd 2 Calculation: (31’s +41’s) / Snapshot
3/12/2014 EOTTA Data Profiles Webinar 29
Processing Rules – Indicators 1, 7, 8
NOTE: The 2012-2013 values for these three indicators will come from Self-Assessments, NOT from MSDS data◦1 – Timely Service Start◦7 – Initial IFSP 45 day timeline◦8a – Transition Plan◦8c – Transition Conference
3/12/2014 EOTTA Data Profiles Webinar 30
Processing Rules – Indicator 1Possible Values:
◦01 – Timely new services◦02 – Valid reasons◦03 – Untimely services◦04 – No new services
Population: Cumulative countCalculation: Leave out 04’s
◦(01’s + 02’s) / (01’s + 02’s + 03’s)
3/12/2014 EOTTA Data Profiles Webinar 31
Processing Rules – Indicator 1(more)SIS Responsibility
◦Identify all NEW services◦Compare the start date of each new
service against the authorizing IFSP date (timely is within 30 days)
◦Identify if there was a valid reason for a start date > 30 days after the IFSP
◦03 - Untimely Services must be chosen if at least one new service was late without an acceptable reason
3/12/2014 EOTTA Data Profiles Webinar 32
Processing Rules – Indicator 7Possible Values:
◦01 – Timely◦02 – Untimely◦03 – Acceptable
Population: Children in the Cumulative count whose Initial IFSP was held within the 12 month period ending on Count Date, formed by joining two collections together
SIS: If InitialIFSPDate > 45 days after ReferralDate, the code should not be Timely
Calculation: (01’s + 03’s) / (01’s+02’s+03’s)
3/12/2014 EOTTA Data Profiles Webinar 33
Processing Rules – Indicator 8aPossible Values:
◦ 01 – Timely◦ 02 – Untimely◦ 03 – Untimely for Acceptable Reason
Population: All Children from the Cumulative count who were countable when they reached 2 years and 9 months of age should have a Transition Plan◦ Snapshot (Child Count) Children older than 2yrs 9mon with
Initial IFSP prior to 2yrs 9mon◦ Exited Children whose PartCExitDate is after age 2yrs
9monSIS: Transition Plan should occur between age of 2
years 3 months and 2 years 9 monthsCalculation: (01’s + 03’s) / (01’s+02’s+03’s)
3/12/2014 EOTTA Data Profiles Webinar 34
Processing Rules – Indicator 8cPossible Values:
◦ 01 – Timely◦ 02 – Untimely◦ 03 – Acceptable
Population: Children from the Cumulative count who were ◦ Countable when they reached 2 years and 9
months of age (see rules on last page) AND◦ Special Ed eligible
SIS: ◦ Conference should occur between age of 2 years 3
months and 2 years 9 monthsCalculation: (01’s + 03’s) / (01’s+02’s+03’s)
3/12/2014 EOTTA Data Profiles Webinar 35
Question and Answer…If you are cold, why should you
go in the corner?
3/12/2014 EOTTA Data Profiles Webinar 36