Michelle Fowler Michelle Hodges - Amazon S3Reporting+Model.pdf · Not-for-Profit Financial...
Transcript of Michelle Fowler Michelle Hodges - Amazon S3Reporting+Model.pdf · Not-for-Profit Financial...
2
3
Michelle Hodges
248.614.6429
Christine Slade
419.842.2445
Michelle Fowler
517.841.4916
4
With donor restrictions
Upon completion participants will be able to:
• Explain changes to the disclosure requirements for liquidity and net
asset classifications
• Understand and evaluate how the new Not-For-Profit Reporting
Model affects your not-for-profit organization
• Describe changes to key new financial statement disclosures
5
With donor restrictions
• Intends to simplify how NFP’s classify net assets
• Intends to provide improved information about:
• Liquidity
• Financial performance
• Expenses
• Cash flows
6
With donor restrictions
• Two classes of net assets
• Board designations
• Underwater endowments
• Reporting expenses by function and nature
• Investment return requirements
• Operating cash flows
• Operations measures
• Liquidity and availability of resources disclosures
7
With donor restrictions
• Calendar years ending 2018
• Fiscal years ending 2019
• Early adoption is permitted
• Applied on a retrospective basis in year
implemented
• Comparative financial statements “relief” in
year of adoption
• Reporting expenses by function and nature
in one location for prior year
• Liquidity and availability of resources
disclosures for prior year
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31
8
To date, how much have you have you heard about the Not-for-Profit Reporting Model:
A. I know a ton; I feel super prepared moving forward
B. I know a little
C. I don’t know as much as I would like to, looking forward to hearing more …
D. I am unsure
9
10
Current Reporting New Reporting
Unrestricted Without donor restrictions*
Temporarily restricted Permanently restricted With donor restrictions*
* May choose to disaggregate further on face of statement of financial position
11
With donor restrictions
Footnote Disclosure Subject to expenditure for specified purpose:
Program A activities:
Purchase of equipment
Research
Educational seminars and publications
Program B activities:
Disaster relief
Educational seminars and publications
Program C activities:
Building and equipment
Annuity trust agreements for research
$1,530
2,128
760
1,120
1,079
1,484
1,075
1,425
10,601
12
With donor restrictions
Subject to the passage of time: For periods after June 30, 20X1 3,140
Subject to NFP spending policy and appropriation: Investment in perpetuity (including amounts above
original gift amount of $22,337), the income from
which is expendable to support:
Program A activities 27,524
Program B activities 27,403
Program C activities 13,662
Any activities of the organization 105,793
174,382
13
With donor restrictions
Subject to appropriation and expenditure when a
specified event occurs: Endowment requiring income to be added to
original gift until fund's value is $2,500 2,210
Paid-up life insurance policy that will provide
proceeds upon death of insured for an endowment
to support general activities 80
2,290
Not subject to appropriation or expenditures Land required to be used as a recreation area 3,000
With Donor Restrictions 193,413
14
Board designations
• Disclose on the face of the
financial statements or
footnotes• Amount
• Purpose
• Type
15
With donor restrictions
Board designated:
Endowment funds 30,000$
Operating reserve 5,500
Capital asset acquisiton 5,000
Total board-designated 40,500
Net investment in plant 24,625
Undesignated 74,815
Total net assets without donor
restrictions $139,940
Net assets without donor restriction
comprised the following at June 30, 20X1:
16
17
With donor restrictions
Underwater endowments
• Reclassify unrestricted deficit to net assets with donor restrictions
• Restatement consideration
• Additional disclosures required for such funds:
• Aggregate of original gift amounts and fair value amounts
• Board’s spending policy
• Continue spending
• Reduce spending
• Stop spending
18
With donor restrictions
In 20X1, the organization adopted ASU No. 2016-14 — Not-for-Profit Entities (Topic 958):
Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities. The standard is intended to
improve net asset classification requirements and the information presented in the financial
statements and notes about an NFP’s liquidity, financial performance, and cash flows.
The standard requires the organization to reclassify its net assets from three categories (i.e.,
unrestricted, temporarily restricted, and permanently restricted) into two categories: net
assets without donor restrictions and net assets with donor restrictions. It also requires
recognition of underwater endowment funds as a reduction of net assets with donor
restrictions. In addition, the guidance requires enhanced disclosures about governing
board designations; composition of net assets with donor restrictions; the organization’s
liquidity; and expenses by both their natural and functional classification.
19
With donor restrictions
Without donor
restrictions
With donor
restrictions Total net
As previously presented:
Unrestricted 133,915$ -$ 133,915$
Temporarily restricted - 102,040 102,040
Permenantly restricted - 100,900 100,900
Net assets as previously presented 133,915 202,940 336,855
Reclassifications to implement ASU
2016-14:
Underwater endowments 5,025 (5,025) -
Net assets, as reclassified $ 138,940 197,915$ 336,855$
The effect on the Organization's net asset balances at June 30, 20X1 as a result of
implementing ASU 2016-14 are as follows:
ASU 2016-14 Classifications
20
With donor restrictions
Not-for-Profit Financial Statement PresentationIn 20X1, the organization adopted ASU No. 2016-14—Not-for-Profit Entities (Topic 958):
Presentation of Financial Statement of Not-for-Profit Entities. ASU 2016-14 provides for
additional disclosure requirements and modifies net asset reporting. The standard requires
the organization to reclassify its net assets (i.e., unrestricted, temporarily restricted, and
permanently restricted) into two categories: net assets without donor restrictions and net
assets with donor restrictions, among other requirements. As a result of adopting this
standard, certain prior year amounts including $5,025 of underwater endowment funds
were reclassified to conform to the presentation requirements.
21
With donor restrictions
Without donor
restrictions
With donor
restrictions Total
Donor-restricted endowment funds -$ 155,390$ 155,390$
Board-designated endowment funds 30,000 - 30,000
Underwater endowments - (5,025) (5,025)
Total 30,000$ 150,365$ 180,365$
Changes in endowment
Endowment, beginning of year 26,337$ 151,403$ 177,740$
Investment returns, net 380 5,132 5,512
Contributions - 2,400 2,400
Transfers 4,600 - 4,600
Appropiation for expenditures (1,317) (8,570) (9,887)
Endowment, end of year $ 30,000 $ 150,365 $ 180,365
Composition of endowmewnt by type of fund
22
With donor restrictions
A donor-restricted endowment fund is considered to be underwater if the fair value of the
fund is less than either the original gift amount or the amount required to be maintained by
the donor or by law. At times, the organization may have individual donor-restricted
endowment funds that are underwater. The organization has a policy that permits spending
from underwater funds depending on the degree to which the fund is underwater, unless
specifically prohibited by the donor or relevant laws and regulations. At June 30, 20X1, the
amount by which funds were underwater was calculated as follows:
Aggregate original gift amount $ 5,500
Aggregate fair value 475
Aggregate deficiency $ (5,025)
23
24
With donor restrictions
• Gifts of cash restricted for acquisition or construction of long-lived assets
• In the absence of explicit donor restrictions, NFPs will be required to
use the placed-in-service approach (or as constructed) when
releasing the restrictions.
• Eliminates the option to release the donor-imposed restriction over
the estimated useful life of the asset.
• Restatement considerations
• Reclassify from restricted net assets to net assets without donor
restrictions amounts of undepreciated capital assets placed in
service.
25
None of our organization’s donor-restricted endowment funds are underwater, and we do not anticipate ever having underwater endowment funds in the future. Therefore, our organization does not need to worry about a spending policy for underwater funds.
A. True
B. False
26
27
With donor restrictions
• Report in one location (on face of financial statements or in notes) by:
• Functional category
• Natural classification
• Most early adopters are choosing to present in the notes
• A supplemental schedule does not meet the requirements
28
With donor restrictions
• Qualitative disclosures now required to describe the methods used to
allocate expenses among program and support categories
• Enhanced guidance on administrative expenses allocated to program
• Activity needs to be for direct conduct or direct supervision
29
With donor restrictions
30
With donor restrictions
Excerpt from statements of an early implementer
31
With donor restrictions
Expense Disclosures
32
With donor restrictions
Consider allocating costs of operation and maintenance of buildings, depreciation, and
interest expense across all functional expense categories to reflect the full costs of those
activities. Costs may be allocated using the following methods:
• Expenses for the administration, supervision, operation, maintenance, preservation,
and protection of the organization's physical plant are allocated based on square
footage.
• Depreciation expense for buildings is allocated based on the square footage used to
support each function. Depreciation expense on equipment is allocated to other
functions based on the location of the equipment and the use of that space. These
allocations are based on information obtained through a periodic inventory of space
and equipment usage.
• Interest expense on capital debt, payments on capital leases classified as interest
expense, and interest expense on other borrowings is allocated based on usage of
debt-financed space.
33
With donor restrictions
Excerpts from statements of early implementors
Functional Allocation of ExpensesThe consolidated statements of functional expenses present expenses by function and
natural classification. Expenses directly attributable to a specific functional area of an
organization are reported as expenses of those functional areas. A portion of General and
Administrative costs that benefit multiple functional areas (indirect costs) have been
allocated across Programs and Other Supporting Services based on the proportion of full-
time employee equivalents of a program or other supporting service versus the total
organizational full-time employee equivalents.
Functional Allocation of Expenses – The costs of providing the various program and supporting services have
been summarized on a functional basis in the consolidated statements of activities and the consolidation
statements of functional expenses. Accordingly, certain costs have been allocated among the programs and
supporting services benefited.
The consolidated financial statements report expenses that are attributed to one than one program or
supporting function. Therefore, expenses require allocation on a reasonable basis that is consistently applied.
All expenses, excluding depreciation and grant disbursements are allocated on the basis on estimates of time
and effort.
34
Upon adoption of FASB ASU 2016-14, Not-for-Profit Entities (Topic 958): Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities, what type of Organizations will be required to present a Statement of Functional Expenses?
A. All not-for-profit organizations
B. Voluntary health and welfare entities
C. Private colleges
D. None
35
36
With donor restrictions
• Now required to be netted against investment income
• Netting limited to external expenses and direct internal expenses
• Direct expenses involve the direct conduct or direct supervision of the
strategic and tactical activities involved in generating investment return
• Compensation for accountant performing endowment allocations
doesn’t qualify
37
With donor restrictions
• Examples of direct investment expenses include:
• CIO’s compensation
• CFO’s compensation
• Investment accountant’s compensation
• CIO’s travel expenses to visit fund managers
Potentially all of the expenses related to the CIO’s activities and potentially an
allocation of expenses related to the CFO’s and investment accountant’s activities.
38
With donor restrictions
• No longer required to disclose the following:
• Investment expenses
• Investment return components
• Also applies to the endowment disclosures
39
40
With donor restrictions
• Reinforces existing requirement of transparency of components of any operating
measures presented
• Disclosures will be enhanced to provide additional information about the items included
or excluded from the operating measure
41
With donor restrictions
Excerpt from footnotes of an early implementor
42
43
Which method is your organization currently presenting for the Statement of Cash Flows?
A. Direct
B. Indirect
C. Unsure
44
With donor restrictions
• Direct method strongly encouraged but not required
• If direct method elected, no longer required to present or disclose the
indirect reconciliation
• Direct method likely easier for users to understand (more meaningful)
45
With donor restrictions
Increase in net assets $20,000
Adjustments to reconcile increase in net assets to net
cash provided by operating activities
Realized and unrealized gains on
investments
(5,000)
Depreciation 10,000
Permanently restricted contributions (6,000)
Capital contributions (2,000)
Change in value of beneficial interests
in trusts
2,000
Increase in contributions receivable (3,000)
Decrease in accounts receivable 2,000
Decrease in inventories and prepaid
expenses
1,000
Decrease in accounts payable (3,000)
Decrease in refundable advance (5,000)
Net cash provided by operating
activities
$11,000
46
With donor restrictions
Program service fees received $121,000
Cash received for grants 10,000
Cash received from contributors 1,000
Cash collected on contributions
receivable for general expenditures
4,000
Interest and dividends received 3,000
Interest paid (1,000)
Cash paid to employees and
suppliers
(127,000)
Net cash provided by operating
activities
$11,000
Cash flows from operating activities:
47
48
With donor restrictions
• Biggest change under new reporting requirements
• Qualitative information on how a NFP manages its liquid available
resources and liquidity risk
• Quantitative information that communicates the availability of a NFP’s
financial assets at the statement of financial position date to meet cash
needs for general expenditures within one year
• Appears most early adopters are combining into one footnote
49
With donor restrictions
Qualitative information in the notes that is useful in assessing a NFP’s liquidity
and communicates how an entity manages its liquid resources available to
meet cash needs for general expenditures within one year of the date of
the statement of financial position
50
With donor restrictions
Quantitative information on the face of the statements or in the notes that
communicates the availability of a NFP’s financial assets at the date of the
statement of financial position to meet cash needs for general
expenditures within one year of the date of the statement of financial
position
51
With donor restrictions
• Availability of a financial asset may be affected by:
• Its nature
• External limits imposed by donors, laws, and contracts with others
• Internal limits imposed by the Board
52
With donor restrictions
The Organization has $3,979,181 of financial assets available within one year of the
statement of financial position date to meet cash needs for general expenditures.
Contributions receivable are subject to implied time restrictions but are expected to be
collected within one year. The Organization manages its liquidity required to meet its
operating needs while also trying to maximize the investment of its available funds. The cash
balance in excess of the daily requirements is invested in short-term investments. The
endowment funds consist of donor-restricted endowments with donor restrictions on the use
of the related income and, therefore, it is not available for general expenditure.
The Organization also has a line of credit with an available balance of $1 million which it
could draw upon. Additionally, the Board has previously designated amounts to an
operating reserve with a balance of $4,300,000 as of June 30, 20XX.
53
With donor restrictions
54
With donor restrictions
55
Availability of a financial asset may be affected by:
A. Its nature
B. External limits imposed by donors, laws & contracts with others
C. Internal limits imposed by the Board
D. All of the above
56
57
With donor restrictions
• Start early to ensure compliance, as well as agreement by those
charged with governance and by audit firm
• For areas where there is flexibility in how you meet the new requirements,
always try to keep in mind what would be important/meaningful to the
users of the financial statements
• Consider materiality
• Utilize example resources available; no point in “recreating the wheel”
58
With donor restrictions
• Example financial statements and disclosures in ASU 2016-14
• Visit websites for early adopters:
• University of Chicago
• University of Southern California
• United Way Worldwide
• Foundation for the Carolinas
• Dallas Theological Seminary
• AICPA NFP Audit and Accounting Guide provides “before and after” context
• NACUBO Advisory Guidance, Implementing FASB ASU 2016-14, Not-for-Profit
Entities (Topic 958): Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit
Entities (private colleges & universities and nonprofit affiliates of public
colleges & universities)
59
Following the presentation today, I would like to learn more about:
A. Net assets
B. Expenses by nature & function
C. Liquidity and availability of resources
D. Nothing, everything was covered, and I feel 100% prepared to move forward
60
61
Michelle [email protected]
517.841.4916
Christine [email protected]
419.842.2445
Michelle [email protected]
248.614.6429
Debbie [email protected]
419.842.2408
Jennie [email protected]
419.865.8118
Your Rehmann Advisor