[email protected] WHY Microinsurance? Véronique Faber, Microinsurance Network.
Michael J. McCord MicroInsurance Centre 2 9 September, 2013
description
Transcript of Michael J. McCord MicroInsurance Centre 2 9 September, 2013
THE LANDSCAPE OF MICROINSURANCE IN LAC: GAPS AND OPPORTUNITIES
MICROINSURANCE FORITOXVI INTER-AMERICAN FORUM ON MICROENTERPRISE – FOROMIC 2013
MICHAEL J. MCCORDMICROINSURANCE CENTRE
29 SEPTEMBER, 2013
Mic
roin
su
ran
ce in
LA
C7.6% of the region’s population is covered by microinsurance
However, this is primarily by low-value life and personal accident products
Need to expand beyond basic products and increase volume of people covered
7.8% without Brazil and Mexico
2.6% without top five (JM, PE, EC, CO, MX)
No. Insured, MM Coverage ratio
Market could be over 300 million covered with premiums of over USD 6 billion.
What gaps in microinsurance development do we see?What opportunities are there for addressing them?
2 questions:
Start by identifying various market types…
Country allocation by market typology
Criteria: macroeconomic, commercial, development, other market issues
Characteristics• MI just starting/about to start• Few insurers, maybe one basic product• Often small population
Gaps•Know-how•Product development•Actuarial analysis•Voluntary sales•Regulatory support•Working with non-MFI channels •IT, especially back office•Consumer protection
Recommendations
• Regulation:• Proportional
supervision
• Distribution• Enhance capacity
• Meso level:• Technical assistance
capacity building• Sharing lessons
• Micro level / private goods:• Paradigm shift facilitation• Institutional structuring
for MI
The Case of Costa Rica
• Characteristics:• Insurance was state-
controlled monopoly until 2008• First private insurers began
sales in 2010• No MI identified yet
• Gaps:• Lack of distribution channels (MFIs
reach only 25,000)• Lack of insurer motivation or
capacity for microinsurance• Lack of client demand and
knowledge
• Regulation:• Learning from other
jurisdictions
• Distribution• MFI network is looking to
partner w/ an insurance broker; pilot in progress
• Need creativity in distribution, as MFI outreach is low
• Meso level:• Leverage REDCAMIF
regional network
• Micro level / private goods:• Niche markets:
microentrepreneurs and Nicaraguan immigrants
• Overcome the ‘brand’ of the state-run company
Recommendations/Opportunities – Costa
Rica
• Characteristics• MI market is driven by MFIs• Limited growth from other
distribution channels
Gaps•Voluntary sales•Back office and IT capacity•Brokers and intermediaries•Cost accounting and controls•Health covers•Ag covers•Claims assessment technologies•Consumer protection
Recommendations
• Regulation:• Assess structures in relation
to IAIS paper on inclusive insurance
• Proportional supervision• Consumer protection
strategies• Reduce/eliminate taxes
• Distribution• Coordinate with other
regulatory bodies regarding new distribution channels (e.g. mobile service providers)
• Enhance capacity of distributors
• Meso level:• Capacity building of insurance
associations and their institutes• Insurance training institutions• Actuaries and risk tables• Technical assistance capacity
building• Develop IT systems• Sharing lessons
• Micro level / private goods:• Help institutions understand
cost structures• Institutional structuring for
MI• Paradigm shift facilitation
• Characteristics:• Vibrant microfinance market• Regulatory requirements of
credit market help drive microinsurance
• Sophisticated market in terms of risks covered, accessibility, and simplicity
• Reasonable MFI commissions (12-18%)
• Client protection has evolved
• Gaps:• Distribution is concentrated in
MFIs, credit-linked products• Lack of affordability for more
complex products• Lack of client
knowledge/demand outside of MFI network
7.23% MI coverage ratio
The Case of - Bolivia
• Regulation:• Clarify distribution
requirements to facilitate alternative distribution• Consider incentives to
expand MI market
• Distribution• Identify and build capacity
of alternative distribution channels• Understand costing
• Meso level:• Market education• Insurance association to
take a larger role in MI advocacy
• Micro level:• Improve capacity of
insurers to respond to market needs
• Understand costing and risk to improve pricing
Recommendations -Bolivia
Characteristics• Robust middle class• Distinction between traditional insurance
and microinsurance is ambiguous• Reaches large numbers of people, but with
basic products, some with questionable value
Gaps• Consumer protection• Regulatory support• Regulatory requirements –
policy content• Linkages with mission-led
institutions• IT/Back office efficiencies• Cost accounting and
controls• Health and ag covers
• Regulation:• Assess structures in relation
to IAIS paper on inclusive insurance
• Proportional supervision• Consumer protection
strategies• Reduce/eliminate taxes
• Distribution• Clarify legal structures for
distribution• Coordinate with other regulatory
bodies regarding new distribution channels (e.g. mobile service providers)
• Enhance capacity of distributors
• Meso level:• Capacity building of insurance
associations and their institutes• Insurance training institutions• Actuaries and risk tables• Technical assistance capacity
building• Develop IT systems• Sharing lessons
• Micro level / private goods:• Help institutions understand
cost structures
Recommendations
• Characteristics:• “Popular” or “mass market”
insurance provided mainly by formal commercial insurers• Regulators recently developed
“8 Circulares” that address mi• Significant R&D initiatives
inform insurers
• Gaps:• Limited distribution to
poorest populations and rural areas• Little effort made to
track product value or social performance
5.36% mi coverage ratio
The Case of - Brazil
• Regulation:• Circular implementation• Careful consumer
protection
• Distribution• Improvement in coverage
through MFI/banking agencies
• Meso level:• Facilitation of technology to
improve efficiencies • Expansion to rural areas• Enhance linkages with
government programs and others that currently reach rural areas
• Micro level / private goods:• Development of
innovative, market-responsive products
Recommendations –Brazil
Characteristics• Robust and rapidly-growing middle
class• Both strong in microfinance and have
many “alternate” delivery channels• Multiple strong insurers and channels
competing for mi business
Gaps• Consumer protection• Regulatory support• Cost accounting and
controls• IT• Health and ag covers
Recommendations
• Regulation:• Assess structures in relation
to IAIS paper on inclusive insurance
• Proportional supervision• Consumer protection
strategies• Reduce/eliminate taxes
• Distribution• Clarify legal structures for
distribution• Coordinate with other regulatory
bodies regarding new distribution channels (e.g. mobile service providers)
• Meso level:• Capacity building of
insurance associations and their institutes
• Actuaries and risk tables• Sharing lessons
• Market education:• Develop for specific needs of
each market• Monitor effectiveness of
market education efforts
• Characteristics:• Vibrant, commercially sustainable market• 25 insurers report MI to FASECOLDA• FASECOLDA provides market education,
capacity building, data collection, representation
• Exploring alternative channels due to growing cost of distribution through MFIs and utilities
• Competition creates tension between profitability and value for clients
• Gaps:• 2 major channels (MFIs and utilities)
are nearly tapped out • High commissions erode value• Lack of high value products and high
value innovation
17.23% mi coverage ratio
The Case of - Colombia
Recommendations – Colombia
• Regulation:• Consider impact on MI
implications in decision making (ex. In-kind funeral)
• Distribution• Take advantage of existing
infrastructure such as call centers
• Meso level:• Continue to leverage
efforts of and share lessons from FASECOLDA
• Micro/institutional level:• Shift focus to long-term
thinking• Agriculture insurance
Opportunities/Recommendations• Further MI development will require both public
and private goods• Focusing on the gaps identified for each of the
market typologies will have the greatest effect• Key areas for action:• Legal framework• Distribution• Market education• Meso level capacity / infrastructure• Micro / institutional level capacity
Microinsurance in Latin America and the Caribbean – the Way Forward• Focus interventions on the Credit-led and Mass
market-led country types• Let early microinsurance champions begin to
develop and show commitment in Frontier countries before significant interventions are undertaken• Hybrid countries need less intervention but can
provide lessons and experience to the rest of the region
Growth will continue in the region, but without key interventions, it will continue on the same trajectory of basic products and a push to mass market