Michael Fuchs the Head of Technology at E.On Kernkraft (Atoms for the Future 2013)
-
Upload
societe-francaise-denergie-nucleaire -
Category
Technology
-
view
909 -
download
4
description
Transcript of Michael Fuchs the Head of Technology at E.On Kernkraft (Atoms for the Future 2013)
![Page 1: Michael Fuchs the Head of Technology at E.On Kernkraft (Atoms for the Future 2013)](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022052617/54584055b1af9f40378b50a9/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Load follow from operator point of view
Michael FuchsAtoms for the Future 2013, Paris, October 21st, 2013
![Page 2: Michael Fuchs the Head of Technology at E.On Kernkraft (Atoms for the Future 2013)](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022052617/54584055b1af9f40378b50a9/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
Installed capacity ≈ 7,8 GW
Employees ≈ 3.500
Power generation ≈ 60 TWh
17 units in operation(7 units operated by E.ON, 10 with minority stakes)
9 units shutdown / under decommissioning and dismantling
E.ON‘s nuclear portfolio
NPP (minority interest)
Nuclear power plant (NPP) in operation
NPP under decommissioning and dismantling
Krümmel
BrokdorfStade
Unterweser
Emsland
Grohnde
Würgassen
Grafenrheinfeld
Gundremmingen B und C
Isar 1Isar 2
Brunsbüttel
Malmö
Barsebäck
Ringhals
Oskarshamn
Forsmark
NPP under decommissioning and dismantling (minority interest)
NPP shutdown after Fukushima
E.ON's Nuclear Fleet:17 Nuclear Power plants in Germany and Sweden
![Page 3: Michael Fuchs the Head of Technology at E.On Kernkraft (Atoms for the Future 2013)](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022052617/54584055b1af9f40378b50a9/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
In operationsince
In operation until
Zusätzl. Jahre
Biblis A 1975 2011
Neckarwestheim 1 1976 2011
Biblis B 1977 2011
Brunsbüttel 1977 2011
Isar 1 1979 2011
Unterweser 1979 2011
Philippsburg 1 1980 2011
Krümmel 1984 2011
Grafenrheinfeld 1982 2015
Gundremmingen B 1984 2017
Philippsburg 2 1985 2019
Grohnde 1985 2021
Gundremmingen C 1985 2021
Brokdorf 1986 2021
Isar 2 1988 2022
Emsland 1988 2022
Neckarwestheim 2 1989 2022
Brunsbüttel
Krümmel
Brokdorf
Grohnde
Gundremmingen B,
C
Grafenrheinfeld
Isar 1, 2
Biblis A, B
Philippsburg 1+2Neckarwestheim 1, 2
Unterweser
Emsland
E.ON’s minority stake
Operated by EnBW
Operated by E.ON
Operated by RWE
Operated by Vattenfall
Units affected by the moratorium
Year of shut down according to recent German Atomic Law
![Page 4: Michael Fuchs the Head of Technology at E.On Kernkraft (Atoms for the Future 2013)](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022052617/54584055b1af9f40378b50a9/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Nuclear Power Plants hinder the development of Renewable Energy!
„Nuclear Power Plants are the most inflexible power generators among the traditional power plants. It’s difficult to control the power of NPPs. Frequent start up’s and shut down’s should be avoided due to safety concerns.“1
„Nuclear Power Plants are the most inflexible power generators among the traditional power plants. It’s difficult to control the power of NPPs. Frequent start up’s and shut down’s should be avoided due to safety concerns.“1
1 Federal Ministry of environment, protection of nature and reactor safety (BMU): Hindernis Atomkraft: Die Auswirkungen einer Laufzeitverlängerung der Atomkraftwerke auf erneuerbare Energien. Berlin (2009) - Kurzstudie
4
![Page 5: Michael Fuchs the Head of Technology at E.On Kernkraft (Atoms for the Future 2013)](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022052617/54584055b1af9f40378b50a9/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
The Reality!
Test of the load flexibility of the Konvoi unit Emsland up to 140 MW/min
5
![Page 6: Michael Fuchs the Head of Technology at E.On Kernkraft (Atoms for the Future 2013)](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022052617/54584055b1af9f40378b50a9/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Why so flexible?
- Fall 1973 – First oil price shock following Yom Kippur war- Acceleration of the German nuclear program under the lead of
Social Democratic government (1972-74)- The goal
• 1980: 18 GWe of nuclear power• 1985: 40 GWe of nuclear power
31,2%
64,7%
4,1%
Nuclear
Fossile
Hydro
Power Generation 1985(Real)
68,9%
27,0%
4,1%
Nuclear
Fossile
Hydro
Power Generation 1985(Goal)
The planned share of nuclear power required load follow capability.
Load flexibility is a build in feature, not an upgrade.
6
![Page 7: Michael Fuchs the Head of Technology at E.On Kernkraft (Atoms for the Future 2013)](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022052617/54584055b1af9f40378b50a9/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
The Reality Today
Power fluctuations due to environmental cooling water temperature limitations at NPP Unterweser!
7
![Page 8: Michael Fuchs the Head of Technology at E.On Kernkraft (Atoms for the Future 2013)](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022052617/54584055b1af9f40378b50a9/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
The Reality Today
25.11.2012 Power control due to fluctuating of wind and solar power
8
![Page 9: Michael Fuchs the Head of Technology at E.On Kernkraft (Atoms for the Future 2013)](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022052617/54584055b1af9f40378b50a9/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
The Reality Today
29.09.2013 Power control due to fluctuating of wind and solar power
9
![Page 10: Michael Fuchs the Head of Technology at E.On Kernkraft (Atoms for the Future 2013)](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022052617/54584055b1af9f40378b50a9/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
The Reality Today
30.04.2013 No wind and solar power
10
![Page 11: Michael Fuchs the Head of Technology at E.On Kernkraft (Atoms for the Future 2013)](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022052617/54584055b1af9f40378b50a9/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Power control modes
� Primary control:
Deviations of 50 Hz grid frequency are countered by Turbine control in a range of
+/- 45 MW.
Primary control in a specified power level range (e.g. KWG 95%-55%),
Combination with secondary control possible,
Start of primary control by shift on demand of load dispatcher.
� Secondary control:
NPPs power is remote controlled by setting of the dispatcher +/- 10 MW/min in a
specified power level range.
Start of secondary control by shift on demand of load dispatcher.
� Load following operation:
Management of all E.ON power plants accordingly to the power demand by load
dispatcher. Minimum load levels are specified.
The power plants are used at optimal costs.
11
![Page 12: Michael Fuchs the Head of Technology at E.On Kernkraft (Atoms for the Future 2013)](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022052617/54584055b1af9f40378b50a9/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Specified Load Flexibility
Power Fluctuation
[%PN/min]
Max power change
[% PN]
Limited to power range
[% PN]
60 5 80 – 10010 20 50 – 1005 50 50 – 1002 70 30* - 100
Power variation
[% PN]
Accumulated number
Average power fluctuations per day(relative to 60 years of operation)
Power jump 10 100000 4,5Power ramp 100-80-100 100000 4,5
100-60-100 15000 0,7100-40-100 12000 0,5100-20-100 1000 0,05100-0-100 400 6,7 (per year)
12
![Page 13: Michael Fuchs the Head of Technology at E.On Kernkraft (Atoms for the Future 2013)](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022052617/54584055b1af9f40378b50a9/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Power diagram of PWR
285
290
295
300
305
310
315
320
325
0 20 40 60 80 100
Reaktorleistung [%]
Küh
lmitt
elte
mpe
ratu
r [°
C]
mittlere KMT
RDB-Eintritt
RDB-Austritt
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
0 20 40 60 80 100
Reaktorleistung [%]
FD-D
ruck
[bar
]
FD-Druck DE-Austritt
- > 40% PN:Power ramp with constant average coolant temperature
- Low temperature fluctuation inside the fuel
- Low influence on reactivity- Low ageing effects on
material- Decrease of steam
pressure depending on steam generator and turbine characteristics
13
![Page 14: Michael Fuchs the Head of Technology at E.On Kernkraft (Atoms for the Future 2013)](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022052617/54584055b1af9f40378b50a9/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Power diagram of BWR
14
![Page 15: Michael Fuchs the Head of Technology at E.On Kernkraft (Atoms for the Future 2013)](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022052617/54584055b1af9f40378b50a9/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Rod-Control-Cluster Assembly (RCCA) in German PWR
� Cluster of 20 Control-Rods in 16x16 FA (Pre-Konvoi)� Cluster of 24 Control-Rods in 18x18 FA (Konvoi)� Absorber Ag80In15Cd5 (broad-band black n-absorber; no grey rods)� Cladding material incl. end-plugs SS1.4541, 550 µm thickness15
![Page 16: Michael Fuchs the Head of Technology at E.On Kernkraft (Atoms for the Future 2013)](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022052617/54584055b1af9f40378b50a9/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Control rod drive in German PWR
� RCCA-drives designed for 40 annual cycles� AREVA recommendation: replace drive after 1 million steps
16
![Page 17: Michael Fuchs the Head of Technology at E.On Kernkraft (Atoms for the Future 2013)](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022052617/54584055b1af9f40378b50a9/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Control rod pattern in German PWR
� Groups L+D5+D6+E0 fully withdrawn (371cm fuel-length): SCRAM-function
� Groups D1+D2+D3+D4: fast load-reduction and axial power shape
� reactivity-worth sufficient for U- and U/MOX-cores
17
D L
� 61 RCCA in 193 FA (checkboard)� Operating in 15 groups of 4: D1 …D6; L1…L9 + central RCCA: E0
![Page 18: Michael Fuchs the Head of Technology at E.On Kernkraft (Atoms for the Future 2013)](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022052617/54584055b1af9f40378b50a9/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Operation of control rod banks in German PWR
� D1 – D6 used for power-control
� alternating for equally distributed fluence, wear&tear
� D2 0 – 25 VLT
� D2 25 – 50 VLT
18
Effective full power days
![Page 19: Michael Fuchs the Head of Technology at E.On Kernkraft (Atoms for the Future 2013)](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022052617/54584055b1af9f40378b50a9/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Reactivity compensation by boron acid in German PWR
� boron for burn up-compensation
� also used for slow power control (not visible
on the graph because
measurements taken at full
power for verification of core
calculation)
19
![Page 20: Michael Fuchs the Head of Technology at E.On Kernkraft (Atoms for the Future 2013)](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022052617/54584055b1af9f40378b50a9/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Power control by boron acid in German PWR
20
� Initial power transient� fast power reduction
by L- and D- CRs� RCA� restore 70% power by
CR-withdrawl� compensation für Xe-
burnout with D-bank CRs
� compensate long-term 30% power-reduction with boron instead of D-bank CRs
![Page 21: Michael Fuchs the Head of Technology at E.On Kernkraft (Atoms for the Future 2013)](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022052617/54584055b1af9f40378b50a9/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Operational limitations for control rods in German PWR
� limiting effect: cladding hoop-strain due to swelling of absorber� design-criterion: effective cladding hoop-strain of 0,75%� use measured correlation swelling vs. fast-neutron-flux (snvt)
21
� conservative limiting snvt: 49 1021/cm2
� EON established RCCA-individual design limits by one-time measurement of hoop strain (which is equivalent to determine the as-built gap size)
� can extend lifetime of RCCA up to several cycles
![Page 22: Michael Fuchs the Head of Technology at E.On Kernkraft (Atoms for the Future 2013)](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022052617/54584055b1af9f40378b50a9/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Limitations for load follow operation
22
UO2
UO2
Pellet-Clad-Interaction (PCI), Crack initiation in fuel rod material
- During fuel conditioning due to interaction between fuel and cladding caused by temperature transients
- In case of fuel leakage- During testing of core instrumentation
=> approx. 50 days per year
![Page 23: Michael Fuchs the Head of Technology at E.On Kernkraft (Atoms for the Future 2013)](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022052617/54584055b1af9f40378b50a9/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Fuel conditioning in PWR
23
![Page 24: Michael Fuchs the Head of Technology at E.On Kernkraft (Atoms for the Future 2013)](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022052617/54584055b1af9f40378b50a9/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Limitations in BWR
24
![Page 25: Michael Fuchs the Head of Technology at E.On Kernkraft (Atoms for the Future 2013)](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022052617/54584055b1af9f40378b50a9/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Experiences
25
� Units cope with the grid requirements in a favorable matter
� Power ramp in daily operation up to 20 MW/min.
� No influence of load follow on maintenance activities until now.
� Inspection intervals of some components are reduced.
� Expected wear and tear on specific components not notable yet.
Nuclear Power Plants have an excellent capability of load follow operation
![Page 26: Michael Fuchs the Head of Technology at E.On Kernkraft (Atoms for the Future 2013)](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022052617/54584055b1af9f40378b50a9/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Comparison of power ramps
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Maximum Power ~600 MW
Minimum Power ~420 MW
Max Power Ramp +/- 8 MW/min
Old Fossil Plants
Maximum Power ~800 MW
Minimum Power ~320 MW
Max Power Ramp +/- 26 MW/min
New Fossil Plants
Maximum Power ~1260 MW
Minimum Power ~630 MW
Max Power Ramp+/- 63 MW/min1
Nuclear Power Plants
Maximum Power ~875 MW
Minimum Power ~260 MW2
Max Power Ramp +/- 38 MW/min
New Gas Plants
Ele
ctric
alP
ower
in
MW
Time in min
Nuclear Power Plants belong to the most flexible plants in the grid!
26
![Page 27: Michael Fuchs the Head of Technology at E.On Kernkraft (Atoms for the Future 2013)](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022052617/54584055b1af9f40378b50a9/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
27
Thank you
for your attention
![Page 28: Michael Fuchs the Head of Technology at E.On Kernkraft (Atoms for the Future 2013)](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022052617/54584055b1af9f40378b50a9/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Power-Changes in PWR
28
power-conditioning
![Page 29: Michael Fuchs the Head of Technology at E.On Kernkraft (Atoms for the Future 2013)](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022052617/54584055b1af9f40378b50a9/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Power-Changes in BWR
29
power-conditioning