Micellization Thermodynamics

24
20120201 Wrap up Blankschtein & Puvvada Project guidance Continue with student presentations

description

Surfactant science

Transcript of Micellization Thermodynamics

Page 1: Micellization Thermodynamics

20120201

• Wrap up Blankschtein & Puvvada• Project guidance• Continue with student presentations

Page 2: Micellization Thermodynamics

Micellization Thermodynamics

• (continued) Review of seminal paper– Puvvada and Blankschtein “Molecular-

thermodynamic approach to predict micellization, phase behavior and phase separation of micellar solutions. I. Application to nonionic surfactants” J. Chem. Phys. 1990, 92, 6, 3710.

Page 3: Micellization Thermodynamics

continuing …

• Finish discussion of the model– Computational scheme

• Discuss P&B’s evaluation of the thermo. properties

• Model predictions and comparison with experiments

Page 4: Micellization Thermodynamics

Equilibrium state of micellar system fully specified by the time averaged:• Minor radius of the micellar core, lc

• Number of surfactant molecules in the micelle, n

• The geometrical shape of the micelle, Sh

Time averaged variables are used since micelles fluctuate.

Page 5: Micellization Thermodynamics

Computational strategy

• For each of the 3 micelle shapes– Spheres– Cylinders– Disks / bilayers (turned out not to be favored in case

examined by P & B)

• The free energy of micellization, gmic, is computed and minimized with respect to lc

• An interpolation scheme is used to account for finite n for cylinders or disks

Page 6: Micellization Thermodynamics

Model contains 3 molecular parameters which must be specified:

• nc – a known property of the hydrocarbon chains

• δ – evaluated from experimental results based on 11 carbon chain hydrocarbons

• ah – estimated from the volume of the head group and its end to end length

Page 7: Micellization Thermodynamics

Determining n

• For spheres a zero growth model is used • For cylinders and disks an interpolation is

made between the infinite n idealized case and the equivalent spherical micelle,

cylgsphgn

ncylgng micmic

sphmicmic

***

*

Page 8: Micellization Thermodynamics

gw/hc , contribution of moving the hydrocarbon tail from water to the hydrocarbon core, is the largest contributor to gmic

Page 9: Micellization Thermodynamics

As ah increases, the steric contribution ,gst, increases with the increase being larger for cylinders than for spheres.

>>> larger head groups favor sphericalover cylindrical micelles

Page 10: Micellization Thermodynamics

The hydrocarbon tail anchoring contribution increases with increasing nc; is larger for spheres than for cylinders

Page 11: Micellization Thermodynamics

Hydrocarbon/water interface creation term depends mostly on the shape and varies little beyond that.

Page 12: Micellization Thermodynamics

Optimum lc is somewhat larger for spherical rather than cylindrical micelles

Page 13: Micellization Thermodynamics

Evaluation of Thermodynamic Properties

• Free energy expressions• Apply multiple chemical equilibrium

principle– Yields micellar size distribution

• Find critical micelle concentration– Defined by break in the monomer mole fraction

versus total surfactant concentration curve

Page 14: Micellization Thermodynamics

Free energy expressions

molecule water a and molecule

surfactant a of volumeebetween th ratio theis

parametern interactio theis ,

surfactantfraction volume theis

mers-in surfactantfraction mol theis

(total) surfactantfraction mol theis

where

2

11ln

20

PTC

mX

X

CXXXkT

m

mmww

Page 15: Micellization Thermodynamics

Free energy expressions, cont.

112

1

11ln

2

0

nC

XXnXkTm

mnnn

Page 16: Micellization Thermodynamics

Micelle size distribution

kT

nngXX

n

micnn

n

exp

gives that requiring

1

1

Page 17: Micellization Thermodynamics

Critical Micelle Concentration

• Found from break in monomer mol fraction versus total surfactant mol fraction curve

• Result is the same for each shape

kT

ShgX mic

CMC

1exp

*

Page 18: Micellization Thermodynamics

Comparison with experimental data

• CMC – As a function of EO count in headgroup for CmEn

nonionic surfactants– As a function of T for CmEn nonionic surfactants

– As a function of nc for alkyl glucosides

• Critical parameters (Tc and Xc) for CmEn nonionic surfactants

• Osmotic compressibility for C12E8

Page 19: Micellization Thermodynamics
Page 20: Micellization Thermodynamics
Page 21: Micellization Thermodynamics
Page 22: Micellization Thermodynamics
Page 23: Micellization Thermodynamics
Page 24: Micellization Thermodynamics

Project guidance• Literature review of general area of interest

– Status/progress report due 2/15– Draft due 2/22 (substantially complete)

• Assessment of the “state of the art” in your specific area of interest– Status/progress report due 2/29– Draft due 3/7 (substantially complete)

• Identification of research/development needs and/or opportunities– Status/progress report due 3/21– Draft due 3/28 (substantially complete)

• Ideas for meeting one (or some closely related) of the needs/opportunities– Status / progress report due 4/4– Draft due 4/11 (substantially complete)

• Final project report – With all four of the above major parts– Due 4/25