mice: on the role of and Prdm9 allelic · PDF filechromosomal fusions and Prdm9 allelic...
date post
30-Jul-2018Category
Documents
view
214download
0
Embed Size (px)
Transcript of mice: on the role of and Prdm9 allelic · PDF filechromosomal fusions and Prdm9 allelic...
1
SupportingInformation
GeneticrecombinationvariationinwildRobertsonianmice:ontheroleofchromosomalfusionsandPrdm9allelicbackgroundLaiaCapilla1,2,NuriaMedarde2,AlexandraAlemanySchmidt3,MariaOliverBonet3,JacintVentura2,AuroraRuizHerrera1,41InstitutdeBiotecnologiaiBiomedicina(IBB),UniversitatAutnomadeBarcelona,CampusUAB,08193,Barcelona,Spain.2DepartamentdeBiologiaAnimal,BiologiaVegetaliEcologia,UniversitatAutnomadeBarcelona,CampusUAB,08193,Barcelona,Spain.3UnitatdInvestigaci,HospitalUniversitariSonEspases,CtraValldemossa79,07010,Palma,Spain,4DepartamentdeBiologiaCellular,FisiologiaiImmunologia,UniversitatAutnomadeBarcelona,CampusUAB,Barcelona,Spain.
1.MaterialandMethods________________________ Page22.SupplementaryTables________________________ Page53.SupplementaryFigures________________________ Page84.References__________________________________ Page18
2
1.MaterialandMethodsa)Animalsandchromosomalcharacterization
Atotalof31wildmalemicewerelivetrappedincommensalhabitatsfrom10different
localitiesrepresentativesoftheBarcelonaRbsystem(TableS1andFig.S1).Threemalesfrom
thelaboratorystrainC57BL6werealsoincludedintheanalysisforcomparison.Mitotic
metaphasespreadswereobtainedfromfibroblastculturesandbonemarrowcells.Cell
cultureswerederivedfromfreshtissuessamplesandtheharvestingofcellsfollowedstandard
procedures.KaryotypesweredeterminedbyanalyzingGbandedchromosomalpreparations
[1].WhenGbandingidentificationwasnotsufficientforchromosomalidentification,weused
commercialmousechromosomespecificpaintingprobes(Cambio,Cambridge,UK)toconfirm
Gbandinghomologiesfollowing[2].TheEthicsCommitteeoftheUniversitatAutnomade
Barcelonaapprovedtheanimaltreatmentprotocolsadoptedherein.
b)Immunoflourescence
Immunofluorescence(IF)ofspermatocytespreadswasperformedfollowing[3].Differentsets
ofantibodieswereused:mousemonoclonalantibodyagainstMLH1(BDPharmigen)forthe
detectionofcrossovers(COs),rabbitpolyclonalserumagainstcentralelementproteinofthe
synaptonemalcomplex(SC)(SYCP3,Abcam),humancalcinosis,Raynaudsphenomenon,
oesophagealdysfunction,sclerodactylyandtelangiectasia(CREST)serumforthedetectionof
thecentromeres,mouseH2AX(Millipore),rabbitH3K9me3(Abcam)andmouseRPA(Abcam).
Correspondingsecondaryantibodieswere:antimouseconjugatedwithFITC,antimouse
conjugatedwithCy3,antirabbitCy3andantihumanCy5(allpurchasedfromJackson
Immunoresearch).
c)Fluorescenceinsituhybridization
WiththeaimofidentifyingthechromosomesimplicatedinRbfusions,fluorescenceinsitu
hybridization(FISH)wasperformedonpreviouslyimmunostainedpreparationsusingBacterial
ArtificialChromosome(BAC)probesforspecificmousechromosomes(chromosomes4,9,11,
12,13and14).BACcloneswhereselectedfromtheUCSCgenomebrowser
(http://genome.ucsc.edu)andpurchasedfromCHORI(http://bacpac.chori.org)(TableS3).DNA
3
waspurifiedfrombacterialpelletsusingaMidiprepextractionkit(Quiagen).FISHwas
performedonbothmetaphasechromosomesandspermatocytespreadsaspreviously
described[2,3],withmodifications.Briefly,1goftheplasmidDNAwaslabeledwithdUTP
digoxigeninusinganicktranslationkit(Abbot)andethanolprecipitatedwithcompetitorDNA
(Cot1MouseDNA,Invitrogen,1mg/ml),salmonspermDNA(Invitrogen,10mg/ml)and1/10
volumeof3mol/Lsodiumacetateovernightat20C.Theslidesweredehydratedinan
ethanolscalecontaining70%formamideat74Cbefore,andafterthedenaturation.Theprobe
wasprecipitatedandwashedtwicewith70%ethanolandthendilutedin15ulofhybridization
buffer(50%deionizedformamide,10%dextransulfate,2xSSCand0.5mol/Lphosphate).
Chromosomesweredenaturedat74atwhichpointtheprobehybridizationmixwasplaced
directlyontheslides,whichwerecoverslippedandincubatedO/Nat37Cinahumid
chamber.Washeswereperformedwith2Xsalinesodiumcitrate(SSC)and50%formamide
solutionbeforeapplyingtheantidigoxigeninconjugatedwithFITC.
d)Imageprocessinganddataanalysis
PreparationswerevisualizedusingaZeissAxioskopepifluorescencemicroscopeequippedwith
theappropriatefiltersandachargedcoupleddevicecamera(ProgResCS10plus,Jenoptik).
ImageswerecapturedandproducedbytheProgRessoftware(2.7.7).Imagesforeach
specimenweretakenblindly(i.e.,specimenswerenumericallyassignedirrespectivelyoftheir
chromosomalcomposition)inordertoavoidagainstunintentionalbiasesinMLH1scores.
TheMicromeasure3.3software[4]wasusedfortheanalysisofrecombinationmaps
(basedonthedistancesbetweenadjacentMLH1andRPAfoci).Foreachchromosome
analyzed,thepositionofeachfocus(MLH1andRPA)wasrecordedasarelativeposition
(percentageofthesynaptonemalcomplextotallength)fromthecentromere,identifiedbythe
CRESTsignalineachpreparation.ThepositionsofMLH1/RPAfociwerecalculatedforeach
chromosomeusingthecentromereasreferencepoint,(i.e.,fromthecentromeretothe
telomereintheqarm).Thusforcomparisonamongchromosomes,thepositionsofMLH1foci
wereexpressedastherelativepositionofeachCOtothelengthofthechromosome(the
lengthofeachSCwasdividedinto10%intervals).Thesedatawereusedtoconstruct
cumulativefrequencydistributionplotsandwecomparedthedifferentdistributionsusinga
KolmogorovSmirnovtest(KStest).Moreover,weanalyzedthefrequenciesofMLH1focialong
4
SCsbydividingtheminthreeregionsdependingontherelativedistancefromthecentromere:
(i)proximal(fromthecentromereto30%oftheSC)(ii)interstitial(between30%70%ofSC)
and(iii)distal(from70%totelomericregion).FortheanalysisofH3K9me3chromosomal
distribution,theMicromeasuresoftwarewasusedtocalculatethesignalarea(measuredin
micrometers)overlappingtheSCforeachchromosomalarmanalyzed.
ThestatisticalanalysiswascarriedoutbymeansofPAWSStatistics18andJMP7
softwarepackage.Giventhatthedistributionofcrossoversperspecimendidnotfollowa
normaldistribution(ShapiroWilktest,pvalue0.001),weappliednonparametricanalysis,
suchasMannWhitneyUtestorKruskalWallistestformeancomparisonandSpearmantest
forcorrelations.
e)Prdm9genotyping
GenomicDNAwasextractedandpurifiedfromcellculturesderivedfrommiceoftheRb
polymorphismzone(n=27)followingthestandardphenolchloroformprotocol.Wesequenced
thePrmd9exon12,fromZnrepeat+3towardsthecterminaldomain.Thisexoncontainsthe
ZnfingerdomainarraythatrecognisesandmethylatesthespecificDNAsequences[5,6].
PRDM9zincfingerarrayswereamplifiedbyPCRusingExTaq(Takara),with4%DMSO,
primersfl1500U20and2848L23[5]asfollows:95C(3min),30cyclesof95C(30s);56C(30
s);72C(90s).PCRproductswererunina2%agarosegelinordertodistinguishdifferent
haplotypes(Fig.S5).Whenmicehadallelesofthesamelength(lengthhomozygotes,n=20),
PCRamplifiedfragmentswerepurifiedwiththeGeneJETPCRpurificationkit(Fermentas).For
micewithallelesoftwodifferentlengths(lengthheterozygotes,n=7),bandswerecutfromthe
agarosegelandpurifiedusingtheGeneJETGelExtractionKit(Fermentas).Inbothcases,
purifiedgeneproductsweresubjectedtobidirectionalSangersequencingwithprimers
fl1822U24and2848L23[6]andreadsweresubsequentlyanalyzedusingtheCLCbioMain
Workbenchprogram,version6.8(Aarhus,DK).Forthoseanimalsfoundheterozygotesfor
allelesofthesamelength,twodifferentsoftwareswereusedinordertodistinguishallelic
variantsanddefinethehaplotypes:Phase
(http://stephenslab.uchicago.edu/software.html#phase)andChampuruv1.0
(http://www.mnhn.fr/jfflot/champuru/).Inanycase,allnewallelicvariantswereconfirmedby
resequencingandreanalyzed.
5
SupplementaryTables
TableS1:Listofspecimens,localities,diploidnumber(2n),chromosomalcharacteristics,meannumberofMLH1foci/cell(standarddeviation,SD),numberofcellsanalyzedintherecombinationstudy(N)andPrdm9genotypingofmicefromthechromosomalpolymorphismareaofBarcelonaincludedinthestudy.St=micewithstandardkaryotype(2n=40).Rb=micewithRobertsonianfusions.n.a.=DNAnotavailableforgenotyping.
Specimen Location 2n FusionsMeanMLH1foci/cellSD
N Prdm9alleles
St1 Arbeca 40 21.652.43 55 n.a.
St2 Vacarisses 40 21.162.23 89 n.a.
St3 CastellfollitdelBoix 40 20.901.74 20 10A/12B
St4 CastellfollitdelBoix 40 20.801.43 21 12B/12B
St5 CastellfollitdelBoix 40 20.681.35 22 10A/10A
St6 CastellfollitdelBoix 40 20.681.43 25 10A/12B
St7 CastellfollitdelBoix 40 20.570.87 21 10A/12C
St8 CastellfollitdelBoix 40 20.571.45 14 10A/12C
St9 CastellfollitdelBoix 40 20.271.40 26 12B/12B
St10 CastellfollitdelBoix 40 20.161.17 25 10A/10A
St11SantaPerptuade
Mogoda40 20.581.02 31 10B/11B
Rb1 SantSadurnd'Anoia 39 Rb(12.13) 20.261.68 27 n.a.
Rb2 SantSadurnd'Anoia 37 Rb(4.14)+2(9.11) 19.712.22 40 10A/10A
Rb3 SantSadurnd'Anoia 38 Rb(4.14)+(9.11) 19.711.65 46 10A/10A
Rb4 SantSadurnd'Anoia 37 Rb(4.14)+(9.11)+(12.13) 20.571.90 46 n.a.
Rb5 SantSadurnd'Anoia 37 Rb(4.14)+(9.11)+(12.13) 20.261.86 47 10A/10A
Rb6 ElPapiol 38 Rb(4.14)+(12.13) 19.391.19 37 10A/10A
Rb7 ElPapiol 38 Rb(4.14)+(12.13) 19.641.27 11 10A/10A
Rb8 AmetlladeSegarra 39 Rb(4.14) 18.930.68 16 10A/10A
Rb9 Castelldefels 29 Rb2(4.14)+2(9.11)+2(12.13)+2(3.8)+2(5.15)+(6.10) 19.951.67 44 10A/10A
Rb10 Castelldefels 32 Rb2(4.14)+(9.11)+2(12.13)+2(5.15)+(6.10) 19.921.59 40 10A/10A
Rb11 Castelldefels 30 Rb2(4.14)+(9.11)+2(12.13)+2(3.8)+2(5.15)+(6.10) 19.851.61 27 10A/10A
Rb12 Castelldefels 30 Rb2(4.14)+2(9.11)+2(12.13)+(3.8)+2(5.15)+(6.10) 19.591.53 37 10A/10A
Rb13 Castelldefels 28 Rb2(4.14)+2(9.11)+2(12.13)+2(3.8)+2(5.15)+2(6.10) 20.231.81 18 10A/10A
Rb14 Castelldefels 30 Rb2(4.14)+2(9.11)+2(12.13)+(3.8)+2(5.15)+(6.10) 19.000.94 19 10A/10A
Rb15 Castelldefels 29 Rb2(4.14)+2(9.11)+2(12.13)+2(3.8)+2(5.15)+(6.10) 18.951.25 22 10A/10A
Rb16 Castelldefels 30 Rb2(4.14)+2(9.11)+2(12.13)+(3.8)+2(5.15)+(6.10) 18.73