MIAD Bridge
-
Upload
allie-eichenhofer -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
description
Transcript of MIAD Bridge
MIAD BRIDGE
Defining Service Learning
VOLUNTEERING AND MENTAL HEALTH IN
CHILDREN
EVERY SEPARATION IS A LINK
THE INTERPLAY OF TRAITS AND MOTIVES ON
VOLUNTEERING
...CONTENTS
...CONTENTS
...CONTENTS
...CONTENTS
...CONTENTS
...CONTENTS
...contents
...contents
...contents
. . . c o n t e n t s
. . . c o n t e n t s
. . . c o n t e n t s
This Month:
In Every Issue
Letter from the Editor ....................... 3
VOLUNTEERING AND MENTAL HEALTH IN CHILDREN.......................................................... 17
Readers Reflect ..................................16
Impact ................................................ 3
MIAD BRIDGE
••
fea•tured
effects of volunteering on children
EVERY SEPARATION IS A LINK .............................................................. 4
THE INTERPLAY OF TRAITS AND MOTIVES ON VOLUNTEERING..................................................... 10a scientific study on the characteristics of volunteers
a look into the empathetic side of service learning
3
Letter From the
You don’t need to be a psychologist to understand the dynamics between
human beings. The authors in this magazine use their differences as
writers to dig deep into research and writing to understand the motivation
(or lack there of ) within people who consider volunteer work.
For this issue of MIAD Bridge, I chose to define the concept of service
learning and volunteer work in relation to psychological characteristics of
the human race. The three featured articles are very diversely written, but
explain the scientific attributes to the reasons we interact with each other
the way that we do, specifically in terms of community service.
The whimsical illustrations and muted photographs represent the more
free flowing characteristics of the human mind and the capricious traits
that differ within us all.
e d i t o rMIAD Bridge
im•pactim•pactAn early learning childhood group is being formed at
Westpark Elementary School in Cedarburg, Wisconsin this
summer. The group is meant to help children with learn-
ing or social disabilities become integrated and comfortable
with the kids they will be having class with in the fall. Run
by David Eichenhofer and aided by teachers and volunteers,
the group provides games and activities appropriate for all of
the children and an exciting/engaging social and learning en-
vironment. Volunteers are expected to interact with the kids.
For more information on how to get involved, please contact
Allie Eichenhofer at 555-707-7097.
.EichenhoferA
...contents
Letter from the Editor ....................... 3
VOLUNTEERING AND MENTAL HEALTH IN CHILDREN.......................................................... 17
Readers Reflect ..................................16
Impact ................................................ 3
A volunteer position with St. Joseph’s Hospital in Mequon,
Wisconsin has opened up for working with in-home care for
senior citizens. Non-medical care services include personal
care, companionship and supervision, as well as help in the
home with the tasks of daily living such as meal prepara-
tion, medication reminders, laundry, housekeeping, errands,
shopping, transportation, and companionship. For more
information please contact Fritz Potter at 555-697-9987 or
visit the St. Joseph website: stjoesinhomecare.com.
Opportunities to Volunteer Locally
Childhood Development In-Home Care
••
Step back and look at the world. It’s such a strange thing, and incredible and beautiful, but rolling across that great sphere is also turmoil. Much of existence, perceived through the eyes of a human, is sorrow and violence, manifesting itself in multitudes of particular guises - war, poverty, famine, prejudice, crime, etc. But we’re stuck here. So, for the sake of being here, of living, how do we make it better? How do we go about diminishing these problems? Where can we possibly start? Underlying most of them, when the complications and differences are for the moment, stripped away, is something simple. For whatever reason, amidst the accumulated confusion of contemporary human life, we fall into the denial or hatred of another human being. We know that humans are at once imperfect and magnificent. What is difficult is accepting the imperfect as inevitable, and forgiving it in ourselves so that we can forgive it in others. There is so much
sameness, if we decide to become aware of it. Our genetic code, which means our basic anatomical structure, which means our physiological functions, are fundamentally identical. We have the capacity to empathize with one another, and we need to use this. What I am saying is obviously nothing new. But the fact that it has survived thus far in the course of human civilization only serves to testify to its solidarity. It is simple, but I think it has profound implications. In all the world’s major religions, the basic tenet, the “Golden Rule,” is the same. We should “Do unto others what we would have done unto us.” Although this is drawn from religion and may seem idealistic, it’s tenets are at base, human, and extend to the nature of our experience in everyday life. For example, how can we expect others to have respect for our own views if we do not respect theirs? And how can we expect to get anything out of a conversation if we don’t try to understand what the other person is
Step Backand
Every sep•a•ra•tion is a link.Simone Weil
trying to get across? A sense of empathy, as current research in neuroscience and psychology is finding, really does permeate our lives. Without having to will a conscious decision, we register the body language and facial expressions of those around us. We are able to base this in our own experience and realize the analogous intentions behind the behavior of others. So what happens when empathy ceases to function? On an individual scale, this can be a major component of closed-mindedness, arguments, and physical fights. Cases in point are bullying, whether at school or over the internet, domestic violence, and gang violence. Among larger groups this is exhibited in similar ways, largely as prejudice against, and mistreatment and/or suppression of, another people. Extreme cases are genocide and war. Can’t these be seen as large-scale manifestations of the inability to take another’s perspective? I don’t mean to oversimplify these grand issues. There are certainly
various other complications that come into play. Many of these complications, however, could be explained as themselves arising partially as a consequence of lack of understanding between people. Circumstances like these coalesce and build upon each other, eventually forming one mass conflict, which leads to atrocities. A clash occurs when we see an individual or group as other than ourselves, that we disagree with so fervently that it appears foreign enough to be designated as wrong or even evil. To protect ourselves we often feel the need to do something to suppress that other. If these notions push further into action, physical harm is done. The thoughts themselves however, are already silently germinating this view of the world. In turn, this obviously impacts the deeds one carries out. If one continues this way unawares, the effects will only multiply. But the human brain is malleable (Boroditsky 6). Biases can be turned around if they are brought to
at theWorld
Written by Isabel Kent
one’s attention. The problem is that maybe reminders are not prevalent in our everyday lives. We may see images of war on the news, but this is perhaps not specific enough. We still watch through our own tinted lenses, maybe as a proponent of one or the other of the conflicting sides. What should be emphasized is the nature of the core disagreement, how and why it exists, perhaps that it should not exist, and what the resolution may be. We also need to be made more aware of our own slant and the perspective we are missing in our repertoire. Once we can see all involved outlooks more holistically, we notice their inherent sameness, and the ensuing ridiculousness of antagonism. To illustrate a concrete example of a social issue involving the inability to take on another perspective, consider the rift between the wealthiest and poorest classes in the United States. My estimation is that much of the very wealthy are so adapted to their way of living that they are not aware of the vast struggles of the impoverished. They must know that the poor do in fact exist, but they cannot put themselves in that situation, because they have never been there and do not relate to it experientially, and they also probably feel no reason to make attempts to do so. They are so comfortable where they are. Whatever charities may be goading them to donate are just an annoyance. The thought of taking on the vantage of the poor does not cross their mind, at least not with any great urgency. And frankly, it would just be too much effort. But if something were to make them, imagine the impact it could have. If the wealthy were made to live like the poor, or to just experience a small part of such a life, perhaps they would realize how awful it can be. To know that they personally would not want to be in a position of poverty may be enough for them to conclude that since there are other humans that are in that place, they need to be helped. The prior example becomes an issue of human
rights. Throughout the world, the poor lack many basic entitlements of life because they are bound by their circumstances. In extreme conditions, there is lack of adequate shelter and nourishment to even stay alive. When the pressure of mortality is so present, anything beyond the necessities of life must seem frivolous. Furthermore, although it varies depending on the specific location, opportunities in jobs, education, and all areas of life, are in scarce supply. Law and justice may be seen as concepts created for the purpose of treating all equally in discernment of right or wrong action, in protecting individuals from mistreatment, and overall, to keep human society as a whole in order and running smoothly. But they are also founded on an emotional groundwork. Humans are innately social, require contact with others for health and well-being, and have built society based on the ability to operate in a network. For this to function properly, cooperation between people is essential. And in order for this to occur, we need to at least have respect for the views of others. This is not to say that it will be perfect. Dilemmas will inevitably arise. The paradox is that once we acknowledge human imperfection, the dilemmas are much less common. Throughout this entire process, empathy aids us. In 2009, President Obama propounded the qualifications he deemed necessary for successors to the Supreme Court. He included everything one might expect: extensive legal experience, a spotless ethical record, and dedication to the rule of law (Garrett 1). However, Obama also added empathy. He stated, I will seek someone who understands that justice isn’t about some abstract legal theory or footnote in a case book; it is also about how our laws affect the daily realities of people’s lives, whether they can make a living and care for their families, whether they feel safe in their homes and welcome in their own nation. I view that quality of empathy, of understanding and identifying with people’s hopes and struggles, as an
What is difficult is accepting the im•per•fect as inevitable, and forgiving it in ourselves so that
we can forgive it in others.
essential ingredient for arriving at just decisions and outcomes. (Garrett 1). When a predicament comes to the fore, empathy helps us determine a just solution. Yes, we do have to rely on written law as a solid standard, but we also must be considerate of the circumstances under which the individuals involved acted. Maybe someone acted wrongly, did something that is illegal, but maybe it was because they were facing such plight, that for them at that time, it was the best decision. We need to be understanding of this. A person who may endanger others cannot be dismissed, but they also cannot be punished for being human. In all cases, beyond categorization of wronged and wrong-doer, and because all of us are really both, we need to be able to see an individual’s suffering and act out of compassion in an effort to correct it. This in itself serves to connect. In it is a realization that we are all human and that we all share the same life. The nature of how we view and interact with others has directed culture, politics, economics, and human society as a whole, which also extends to our impact on the environment. All of these things provide us with a striking image of how we participate in and create our world. This web of inter-relationships has biological foundations, into which current studies surrounding the nature of the human nervous system have brought new insights. A region toward the front of the brain called the medial prefrontal cortex, or MPFC, activates when we are pondering our own feelings, but also when we are thinking about or observing those same feelings in another (Boroditsky 5). More specifically, a class of cells called mirror neurons, which are located in various areas of the brain, have been found to direct our ability to read not only another person’s actions, but also the intentions and emotions behind them. In an interview with the New York Times, Dr. Giacomo Rizzolatti, a neuroscientist at the University of Parma
7
MIAD Bridge
credited with some of the first research of these structures in the 1990’s, was quoted in saying, “We are exquisitely social creatures. Our survival depends on understanding the actions, intentions, and emotions of others. Mirror neurons allow us to grasp the minds of others not through conceptual reasoning but through direct simulation” (Blakeslee 1). Here is very real evidence of just how connected we are. In a sense we can simultaneously experience the thoughts and actions of another. This also poses the intimate connectivity of thought, action, and language. These cells fire when one performs an action, sees another carrying out that action, hears it happening, says the word for that action, or hears that word (Blakeslee 1). Mirror neurons can be seen as the meeting place of these different avenues, which all allow for understanding between people, and are essentially linked as a means of communication whose framework is emotional. It is also important to note that social emotions like shame, pride, embarrassment, and so on, are centered in a uniquely human mirror neuron system in a brain region called the insula. In a study conducted by Dr. Christian Keysers at the University of Groningen in the Netherlands, it was found that when people watched a hand go to caress someone and then saw another hand push it away, this region registered the pain of rejection. Moreover, he noted that humiliation appeared to be “mapped in the brain by the same mechanisms that encode real physical pain” (Blakeslee 3). This just goes to show us that when someone is suffering from emotional trauma, they are also really ailing from physical distress. When mirror neurons malfunction, an emotional level of communication ceases to occur. It is now thought that this is a major cause of Autism and Aspberger’s disease. Autistic individuals are often cited as sort of living in their own world, or being
Illustrations by Robert Walsh
highly antisocial. It could be that the neural basis of social abilities is lacking, and they therefore are significantly unable to relate to other people. Studies show that these individuals can identify an emotional facial expression, and even imitate it, but they do not feel its emotional significance (Blakeslee 2). A similar effect is seen in individuals with Aspberger’s, who are unable to read facial expressions and vocal inflections, recognize sarcasm, and also cannot understand figurative language. They interpret everything logically and literally. For individuals with either disorder, everyday life is made extremely difficult simply because they cannot adequately relate socially and emotionally to other people. The importance of empathy is apparent. It lends us the competence to recognize that other viewpoints must be just as valid as our own. Scientific research has provided us with more clues as to how and why this phenomenon operates, and has given us greater insight into how incredible this biological capacity truly is. The complexity and social grounding of our empathy is something uniquely human. It lies behind much of our daily decisions and behavior, and is one of the key components of how we have developed as a society. Truly, it needs to exist for us to exist. All of this serves to remind us of empathy’s profundity. But what teaches us most is the face-to-face encounter in which we share a real and fathomless
humanness with another.
References:
Blakeslee, Sandra. “Cells That Read Minds.” The New York Times. The New York Times Co. 10 Jan. 2006. Web. 19 Apr. 2011.
Boroditsky, Lera. “Empathy and Other Mysteries.” American Scholar. 80.1 (2011): 44-52. Academic Search Premier. Web. 7 Apr. 2011.
Garret, Major. “Obama Pushes for ‘Empathetic’ Supreme Court Justices.” FoxNews.com. Fox News Network, LLC. 1 May 2009. Web. 13 Apr. 2011.
9
MIAD Bridge
4.2 -
4.1 -
4 -
3.9 -
3.8 -
3.7 -
3.6 -
3.5 -
3.4 -
3.3 -
3.2 -
Relative Conflict Frequency(Weekly)
Low High
Well-Being
Low Agreeableness
High Agreeableness
Empathy can easily be related to
agreeableness. The agreeableness char-
acteristic in the human spectrum of
traits is a “tendency to be pleasant and
accommodating in social situations”
(online dictionary). In contemporary
personality psychology, agreeableness
is related to the support of individual
differences in concern for cooperation
and social harmony. [1] People who
are agreeable are also often empa-
thetic, considerate, friendly, generous,
and helpful. Not only do these people
project positive traits, they also tend
to believe that others are capable of
obtaining them as well.
Studies show that people who live
this way are generally happier and
more satisfied with life. They also tend
to stay calm and deal with conflict bet-
ter than most.
Graziano, W.G., & Eisenberg, N. (1997). Agreeableness; A dimension of personality. In R. Hogan, S. Briggs, & J. Johnson, (1997). Handbook of Personality Psychology. San Diego, CA: Academic Press
a•gree•a•ble•ness
Agreeableness, Extraversion and Prosocial Value Motivation
The In•ter•play of Traits and Motives on Vol•un•teer•ing
All images are of Abbey Gregorash in her volunteer environment.Photos taken by Allie Eichenhofer
Morris A. Okun+ Maria Rosario T. de Guzman* Gustavo Carlo* George Knight+
* University of Nebraska-Lincoln
+ Arizona State University
During the past 20 years, there has been a renaissance of interest in personality and motivational concepts in personality and social psychology (Little, 1983). Scholars continue to develop conceptual models to account for the links between traits, motives, and behaviors. Traits and motives can be conceptualized as representing different levels of personality functioning (McAdams, 1994; McClelland, 1985a). McCrae and Costa (1999) posited that traits are “enduring patterns of thoughts, feelings, and actions...” (p. 140). Traits are organized hierarchically from narrow to broad traits. At the broadest level, researchers have identified five common traits: agreeableness, extraversion, openness, neuroticism, and conscientiousness. Motives reflect the tendency to strive for a general class of incentives that are highly fused with affect (McClelland, 1985b). Several classes of motives have been identified in the research literature on volunteering (Clary et al., 1998; Okun, Barr, & Herzog, 1998). However, the relations between traits and social behaviors are often relatively modest in magnitude (cf., Bem & Funder, 1978; Kenrick & Funder, 1988). This is also the case for the relations between personality traits and volunteering behavior (Omoto & Snyder, 1995). Several explanations for the relatively modest
and inconsistently significant relations have been posited (Carlo, Knight, Eisenberg, & Rotenberg, 1991; Eisenberg, 1986; Kenrick & Funder, 1988; Knight, Johnson, Carlo, & Eisenberg, 1994). First, investigators may not have focused upon the traits that are conceptually most relevant to the specific social behavior being studied. Second, the relations between traits and social behaviors may be mediated by motives. Third, traits might interact with other traits to jointly influence motives, which in turn, are causally more proximal to social behaviors. Fourth, traits might interact with motives to jointly influence social behaviors.
With regard to the first explanation, Graziano and Eisenberg (1997) suggest that agreeableness might be the core dispositional trait contributing to prosocial behaviors. Agreeable individuals are altruistic, straight-forward, trusting, soft-hearted, modest, and compliant (Graziano. 1994; McCrae & Costa, 1999). There is empirical evidence of the link between agreeableness and prosocial behaviors (see Graziano & Eisenberg. 1997). Furthermore, researchers have found significant positive relations between agreeableness and volunteering (e.g., Smith & Nelson, 1975). Similarly, extraversion is associated with sociability, gregariousness,
A•gree•a•ble•ness might be the core dispositional trait contributing to prosocial behaviors. ”
“
assertiveness, positive emotions, warmth, and activity (McCrae & Costa, 1999); and has been shown to predict volunteering (Burke & Hall, 1986; Kosek, 1995; Smith & Nelson, 1975). Because volunteerism often requires extensive social interactions, scholars have linked it to extraversion (e.g., Burke & Hall, 1986). Hence, in the present study we have made predictions regarding the relations of personality traits (i.e., agreeableness and extraversion) that are clearly conceptually related to a social behavior (i.e., volunteering). Specifically, we predict that agreeableness and extraversion will be positively associated with volunteering behavior.
With regard to the second explanation, scholars have noted that traits may be indirectly related to social behaviors. A number of possible mediating variables have been posited that might help account for the relations between traits and prosocial behaviors such as volunteering. Among those possible mediating variables are motives. Clary and his associates (Clary et al., 1998) identified a set of six motives for volunteering including: career enhancement, learning new skills, social interaction, escape from negative feelings, personal development, and expressing prosocial values. Of these motives, the prosocial value motive to volunteer (hereafter referred to as prosocial value motive) is clearly conceptually related to volunteering because it reflects the endorsement of care-based values to voluntarily assist others (Allison, Okun, & Dutridge, 2002; Clary et a]., 1998; Clary & Orenstein, 1991; Okun, 1994; Omoto & Snyder, 1995; Penner & Finkelstein, 1998). Further, both agreeableness and extraversion reflect a positive orientation towards others, which conceptually forges a link between these personality dispositions and prosocial value motives. Hence, it is reasonable to presume that individuals who are altruistic, trusting, warm, and emotionally positive
may value prosocial behaviors. In the present study we examined the degree to which the effects of agreeableness and extraversion on volunteering behavior were mediated by prosocial value motives.
With regard to the third explanation, extraverted individuals seek warm and positive social interactions, but these desires really facilitate volunteering behavior when combined with the altruistic orientation inherent in agreeableness. Further, this joint effect may be mediated through prosocial value motivation as described above. Therefore, we also examined the degree to which the interaction effect of agreeableness and extraversion on volunteering behavior was mediated by prosocial value motives.
With regard to the fourth explanation, extraversion may provide the affiliative disposition needed to volunteer. However, volunteerism may be jointly determined by whether there is a match between the personality traits associated with volunteerism and the motives that are most salient (Carlo, Allen, & Buhman, 1999; Clary & Snyder, 1999). For example, extraverted individuals may be more likely to volunteer than introverted individuals only when their prosocial value motivation is high. Prosocial value motives are conceptually related to individual differences in sympathy (see Graziano & Eisenberg, 1997) which are linked to prosocial behaviors including altruism (Batson, 1999; Eisenberg & Fabes, 1998; Staub, 1978). Consequently, we examined the degree to which prosocial value motivation moderates the relation extraversion and volunteering.
13
MIAD Bridge
meth•od 2.1. Participants A sample of 849 college students was drawn from 1,272 students enrolled in sections of Introduction to Psychology at a large southwestern state university. Students completed a battery of measures in classes as a prelude to participating in studies that can be used to fulfill a course requirement. To reduce respondent burden, students were randomly assigned to one of three versions of the battery with the constraint that approximately one-third of the students received each version of the battery. To assess sample biases, we compared students in the sample with those who were not in the sample on demographic and main variables. Students in the sample had significantly lower prosocial value motivation to volunteer than students who were not in the sample Similarly, we compared students in the sample who had missing data with those who did not and found that students with missing data had significantly
higher openness to experience scores, than students without missing data. Sample biases were weak in magnitude of effect and sparse. The final sample consisted of 796 undergraduates (Median age = 19 years; 56% were women; 75% were White, non-Hispanic, 8% were Hispanic, 5% were Asian, 3% were African American).
2.2. Measures 2.2.1. Volunteering We created a measure of volunteering based upon responses to four items. Students were asked whether they had ever volunteered (0 = no, 1 = yes), were currently volunteering (0 = no, 1 = yes), planned on volunteering during the next two months (0 = no, 1 = yes), and the likelihood that they would volunteer at the campus-based community service program if asked (0 = definitely no, 1 = probably no, 2 = maybe, 3 = probably yes, and 4 = definitely yes). Students were provided the following definition of volunteering: “By volunteering, we mean performing a service without compensation for an organization or agency. This may include church/religious groups, social service agencies, schools, not-for-profit organizations (e.g., American Red Cross), cause-oriented organizations (e.g., a political campaign and/or environmental conservation group), or for profit corporation (e.g., hospital)”. The percentage of students who ever volunteered, were currently volunteering, and planned on volunteering in the next two months were 90%, 19%, and 45%, respectively. The mean rating for likelihood of volunteering at the campus- based community program if asked was 2.20 (SD = 0.98).
To determine whether a composite index of volunteer behavior could be created, a principal components analysis was carried out after standardizing the scores on the four items. The results of this analysis indicated that the eigenvalue for the first factor was 1.81. The eigenvalues for the remaining factors were all below 1.00. The lowest factor loading on the first factor was 0.52. Factor scores were created using the regression method. Higher scores
indicate greater involvement in volunteering. Furthermore, prior studies have shown validity evidence for self-report, aggregate measures of about past, present, and future volunteerism (e.g., Clary et al.,1998; Penner & Finkelstein, 1998).
2.2.2. Prosocial Value Motive We employed the Value-Expressive Scale from the Volunteer Functions Inventory (VFI) to assess prosocial value motive (Clary, Snyder. & Ridge, 1992). Participants indicated on a 7-point scale how important/accurate each of five prosocial value reasons is for why they volunteer or would be if they were to volunteer (sample item, “I feel compassion toward people in need”). Anchor points on the scale were from: 0 = “not at all important/accurate for you”, through 6 = “extremely important/accurate for you”. Scale scores were formed by averaging the responses to the five items. Higher scores on the scale are associated with greater prosocial value motive to volunteer. Adequate psychometric properties of this measure have been reported elsewhere (Allison et al., 2002; Clary et al., 1992) 2.2.3. Big Five Traits Traits were assessed used the 44-item version of the Big Five Inventory (John, Donahue, & Kentle, 1991 ). This commonly used inventory was originally constructed to allow for the efficient assessment of the big five dimensions of personality without providing for the more elaborate measurement of the various facets associated with each dimension (Benet-Martinez & John, 1998). BFI items consist of short phrases that are used to assess the most prototypical traits associated with each of the Big Five dimensions (John et al., 1991).
In the present study, students indicated how much they agreed or disagreed that each statement applied to them. Ratings were made on a 9-point scale with anchor points ranging from 0 = “strongly disagree” to 8 = “strongly agree”. A sample item for extraversion was “Outgoing, sociable”, and a sample item for agreeableness was “Is generally trusting”. Scale scores were formed by averaging the responses to the items associated with each personality dimension. Th e number of items on each scale ranged from 8 (Extraversion and Neuroticism) through 10 (Openness to Experience).
As scores on each scale increase, individuals are describing themselves as being higher on each personality dimension. Prior researchers have presented adequate evidence of the reliability and validity of the BFI scales (Benet-Martinez & John, 1998; Okun & Finch, 1998).
3.1. Preliminary Analyses According to our first explanation for the inconsistent and relatively small relations between personality variables and volunteering, researchers may not have focused on those traits that are most conceptually relevant to volunteering. As predicted, among the Big Five dimensions, agreeableness had the strongest correlation with volunteer behavior, followed by extraversion. Consistent with our second explanation, among the Big Five dimensions, agreeableness exhibited the strongest correlation with prosocial value motive, followed by extraversion, and prosocial value motive was the strongest overall correlate of volunteer behavior Among the control variables, females had higher prosocial value motives and engaged in volunteer behavior to a greater
re•sults
MIAD Bridge
15
degree than males. The correlations among the Big Five dimensions ranged from –0.29 to 0.33. In light of the hypotheses of the present study, it is noteworthy that the correlation between agreeableness and extraver- sion was modest.
3.2. Data Analytic Approach In testing our second, third, and fourth explanations for the weak and mixed findings regarding the relation between personality dimensions and volunteering, we carried out five regression models. We included conscientious, neuroticism, and openness as covariates in these analyses because they are often significantly correlated with agreeableness and/or extraversion. In addition, because gender differences in prosocial behaviors and personality variables have been found in prior research (e.g., Eagly & Crowley, 1996; Penner & Finkelstein, 1998), we also controlled for gender, neuroticism, openness to experience, and conscientiousness. Including neuroticism, openness to experience and conscientiousness as covariates did not alter the results with respect to the hypotheses that we tested. 3.3. Testing The Mediation The second possible explanation for the prior weak and inconsistent relations between personality traits and prosocial behaviors posited that agreeableness and extraversion predicted prosocial value motives, and that prosocial value motive is the strongest predictor of volunteer behavior. We tested this explanation by carrying out two regression analyses. In the first analysis, we regressed volunteering behavior on the control variables (gender, conscientiousness, neuroticism, openness to experience), agreeableness, extraversion, and prosocial value motive. In the second analysis, we regressed prosocial value motives on the control variables, agreeableness, and extraversion. The standardized partial regression coefficients from the first regression analysis constitute the direct effects of the variables on volunteer behavior whereas the standardized partial regression coefficients (betas) from the second regression analysis constitute the direct effects of the variables on prosocial value motives.
Allison, L. D., Okun, M. A., & Dutridge, K.
S. (2002). Assessing volunteer motives: a
comparison of an open- ended probe and
likert rating scales. Journal of Commu-
nity and Applied Social Psychology, 12,
243–255.
Batson, D. C. (1999). Altruism and proso-
cial behavior. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske,
& G. Lindzey (Eds.). Th e hand- book of
social psychology (4th ed.) (Vol. 2, pp.
282–316). NY: McGraw-Hill.
Bem, D. J., & Funder, D. C. (1978). Predict-
ing more of the people more of the time:
assessing the personality of situations.
Psychological Review, 85, 485–501.
Benet-Martinez, V., & John, 0. P. (1998).
Los Cinco Grandes across cultures and
ethnic groups: multitrait- multimethod
analyses of the Big Five in Spanish and
English. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 75, 729–750.
Burke, D. M., & Hall, M. (1986). Personal-
ity characteristics of volunteers in a Com-
panion for Children program. Psychologi-
cal Reports, 59, 819–825.
Carlo, G., Allen, J., & Buhman, D. (1999).
Facilitating and disinhibiting prosocial
behaviors: the nonlinear inter- action of
trait perspective taking and trait personal
distress on volunteering. Basic and Applied
Social Psychology, 21, 189–197.
Carlo, G., Knight, G. P., Eisenberg, N.,
& Rotenberg, K. J. (1991). Cognitive
processes and prosocial behaviors among
children: the role of aff ective attribu-
tions and reconciliations. Developmental
Psychology, 27, 456–461. 1304 Carlo et
al., Th e interplay of traits and motives on
volunteering. PAID 38 (2005)
Clary, E. G., Snyder, M., & Ridge, R.
(1992). Volunteers’ motivations: a
functional strategy for the recruitment,
placement and retention of volunteers.
Nonprofi t Management and Leadership,
2, 333–350.
Clary, E. G., Snyder, M., Ridge, R. D.,
Copeland, J., Stukas, A. A., Haugen, J.,
& Miene, P. (1998). Understanding and
assessing the motivations of volunteers: a
functional approach. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 74, 1516–1530.
Eagly, A. H., & Crowley, M. (1996). Gender
and helping behavior: a meta-analytic re-
view of the social psychological literature.
Psychological Bulletin, 100, 283–308.
Eisenberg, N., & Fabes, R. A. (Eds.).
(1998). Prosocial development & Damon,
W. (Eds.). Handbook of child psychology:
social and personality development (Vol. 3,
pp. 701–778). NY: Wiley.
Graziano, W. G. (1994). Th e development
of agreeableness as a dimension of person-
ality. In C. F. Halverson, G. A.
Graziano, W. G., & Eisenberg, N. H. (1997).
Agreeableness: a dimension of personality.
In R. Hogan, J. Johnston,
John, O.P., Donahue, E.M., Kentle, R.
(1991). Th e Big-Five Inventory-Versions
4a and 54. Technical Report, Institute of
Personality and Social Research, Univer-
sity of California, Berkeley, CA.
Kenrick, D. T., & Funder, D. C. (1988).
Profi ting from controversy: lessons from
the person-situation debate.
American Psychologist, 43, 23–34.
Knight, G. P., Johnson, L. G., Carlo, G.,
& Eisenberg, N. (1994). A multiplicative
model of the dispositional antecedents
of a prosocial behavior: prediing more of
the people more of the time. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 66,
178–183.
Kosek, R. B. (1995). Measuring prosocial
behaviors of college students. Psychologi-
cal Reports, 3, 739–742.
Little, B. R. (1983). Personal projects: a
rationale and method of investigation.
Environment and Behavior, 15, 273–309.
McAdams, D. P. (1994). Can personality
change? Levels of stability and growth in
personality across the life span.
McClelland, D. L. (1985a). Human moti-
vation, Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman, &
Company.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1999). A
five-factor theory of personality. In L. A.
Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.),
Handbook of personality: theory and
research (2nd ed.) (pp. 139–153). New
York: Guilford Press.
Okun, M. A. (1994). Th e relation between
motives for organizational volunteering
and frequency of volunteering by elders.
Journal of Applied Gerontology, 13,
115–126.
Okun, M. A., & Finch, J. F. (1998). Th e
Big Five personality dimensions and the
process of institutional departure.
Contemporary Educational Psychology,
23, 233–256.
Okun, M. A., Barr, A., & Herzog, A.
R. (1998). Motivatisurement models.
Psychology and Aging, 13, 608–621. Carlo
et al., from Personality and Individual
Differences 38 (2005)1305
Omoto, A. M., & Snyder, M. (1995). Sus-
tained helping without obligation: motiva-
tion, longevity of service, and perceived
attitude change among AIDS volunteers.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychol-
ogy, 68, 671–686.
Penner, L. A., & Finkelstein, M. A. (1998).
Dispositional and structural determinants
of volunteerism. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology. 74, 525–537.
Smith, B. M., & Nelson, L. D. (1975).
Personality correlates of helping behavior.
Psychological Reports, 37, 307–310.
Staub, E. (1978). Positive social behavior
and morality: I. Social and personal infl
uences. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Every Monday
Jack Webster, a psychology
graduate undertaking his master’s
degree, goes back to school. The
school is Lincoln Middle School
of Port Washington, Wisconsin
and the reason he’s there is to
volunteer his time.
Because of his love for children
and his drive for psychology
related activities, Webster set up
a peer-mentoring project to help
students with learning disabilities
become motivated in school.
Between finishing his degree
at the University of Wisconsin,
Madison and starting his master’s
in occupational psychology at
the University of East London,
Webster began sessions with
the middle school students at
Lincoln Middle School to focus
on empowering academically
challenged boys through fun and
engaging activities.
readers
re•flectre•flect
“When I started the project,
teachers at the school warned
me that I would have a problem
getting the boys to stay after
school, and that I would have to
find ways to motivate them, so I
was prepared for that,” Webster
explains. “In the beginning there
were problems with temper and
shyness but these were ironed out.
Now the boys eagerly ask about
the next session. That turnaround
is really inspiring. Through this
experience, I’ve become really
close with several of the students.
After some tough love and
inspiring experiences, they now
come to me for personal problems
and heart-to-hearts and I think
they consider me to be someone to
look up to and take comfort
in talking to.”
-Jack Webster
“That turn•a•round is really in•spir•ing”
“That turn•a•round is really in•spir•ing”
“That turn•a•round is really in•spir•ing”
Notes from our readers about their personal experiences in volunteering and what they’ve gained along the way
••
Upper Class Income
Middle Class Income
Lower Class Income
8%
12%
16%
PERCENT OF CHILDREN AGES 5-17 WITH A LEARNING DISABILITY(Cdc. Health Data Interactive)
vol •un• t er •1ngeMental Health
in Children
and
e By David Eichenhofer
vol •un• t er •1ngvol •un• t er •1nge
psy•ch•••
Em•pa•thy often develops natu-
rally in children when parents model
altruistic behaviors, openly discuss the
needs of others, and provide opportu-
nities for helping. In situations where
family dynamics are not conducive,
parents are egocentric, or children
exhibit mental health difficulties which
inhibit such development this trait can
be more difficult to establish. Disorders
such as Attention Deficit Hyperactivity
Disorder, Oppositional Defiant Disor-
der, Learning Disabilities, or Autism
Spectrum disorder, among others, can
inhibit development. This can further
involve impairment in social aware-
ness, self awareness, and empathy
which, left untreated, can impact
relationships, school performance, and
community functioning. Providing op-
portunities, in the educational environ-
ment, for children to volunteer to help
others can foster the development of
empathy, improve relationships with
peers, and promote a range of prosocial
behaviors among all students.
School Guidance Counselors,
School Psychologists, and School Social
Workers, as well as Speech/Language
Therapists often provide social skills
training as part of their work with
special needs students. These related
service providers often recruit volun-
teers from students’ classrooms, with
parental permission, to help establish
small groups to facilitate programming.
While the primary intent of these ses-
sions is to meet the needs of special
education students, regular education
classmates benefit in many ways also.
For the special education students,
the peer volunteers provide positive
role models for social skill develop-
ment. Peer models provide examples of
verbal communication skills, turn tak-
ing, initiating social dialogue, resolving
conflict, patience in social situations,
and expanded range of interests. Spe-
cial education students develop a sense
of inclusion, security in the school en-
vironment, and establish relationships
with classmates that often generalize to
less structured situations (lunchroom,
playground, hallways).
In addition to skill acquisition, these
students frequently demonstrate
improved confidence, increased verbal
communication, less anxiety in social
situations, and general mood stability.
Classmates can often model strategies
to cope with frustration and access re-
sources when agitated or confused in a
range of settings. Depending upon the
nature of the disability, these special
education students may also increase
their awareness of social cues and build
empathy for others.
With regard to peers, many enter
the volunteer situation with a strong
sense of empathy, especially those
involved in middle and high school
settings. Programs such as ‘Best
Buddies’ pair regular education high
school students with their special
education classmates as a means to
vol•un•teer•ingvol•un•teer•ingvol•un•teers tend to be friendly, enjoy interpersonal relationships, and have higher levels of empathy and concern for the welfare of others.
“”
psy•chMIAD Bridge
facilitate social interaction, involve-
ment in extra-curricular activities, and
community awareness. In addition
to supports provided to these special
needs students, the peers often report
a sense of inspiration and increased
confidence and self-esteem themselves.
Not only do they demonstrate increased
empathy for their special friends, they
often experience increased empathy for
others in general. A stronger apprecia-
tion for diversity is reported and many
students become vocal advocates for
others across a variety of situations. As
with their special education classmates,
these regular education volunteers
also experience less anxiety in social
situations, enhanced confidence, and
improved affect in general. In addi-
tion, many of these volunteers go on to
helping professions and/or continue to
volunteer in schools and communities
as part of their daily lives.
Building empathy, through these
and similar volunteering opportunities,
is also very consistent with many of the
current anti-bullying efforts in the edu-
cational system. By helping students
better appreciate diversity, accept dif-
ferences among others, and establish
increased sensitivity for the needs of
others, we are likely to see a decrease
in bullying behavior in social situa-
tions. In addition, we can increase the
number of students willing to advocate
for victims in those circumstances.
In discussing the benefits of vol-
unteering with adults, Aleem (2011)
reports improved physical health,
reduced stress, and overall life sat-
isfaction. Increased social interac-
tion, improved sense of purpose, and
stronger self-esteem are also indicated.
Hamilton and Fenzel (1987) found that
youth participating in volunteer activi-
ties also demonstrate stronger decision
making skills, more enjoyable social
experiences, and a stronger sense of so-
cial responsibility. This was found to be
especially true among teens or young
adults who were felt to be at risk for
mental health or behavioral difficulties.
Given the demonstrated benefits
of volunteering among children and
adults, it makes sense from an indi-
vidual and community perspective
to continue to offer opportunities for
helping others within the educational
setting. Consult with your school pupil
services providers to help establish
these offerings and work to build
relationships with community service
agencies as well. These opportunities
can positively impact the mental health
of all students.
pa •thyem•
vol•un•teer•ingvol•un•teer•ingReferences
Aleem, Yasmeen. “Volunteering and Psychological Health.” Kaplan University. N.p., 2011. Web. 12 Oct. 2011.
S.F. Hamilton, and L.M. Fenzel, “The Effect of Volunteer Experience on Early Adolescents’ Social Development” (paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC, 1987)
19
Designed and Edited by Allie Eichenhofer