MIA Central Terminal Redevelopment Program presentation, November 19, 2014

1

DRAFT – FOR PRELIMINARY AND PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY

1

MIA CENTRAL TERMINAL REDEVELOPMENT PROGRAM

Executive Briefing for

Citizens’ Transportation Advisory Committee (CTAC)

November 19, 2014

2


2

Discussion Agenda

• MIA 2015 Terminal Area Configuration

• MIA 2035 Terminal Area Configuration

• Activity Summary

• Gate and Hardstand Requirements

• Terminal Space Requirements

• Other Terminal Capital Projects

• Terminal Concept

• Terminal Space Layout

• Terminal Construction Sequencing and Milestones

• Program Cost Estimates

3


3

MIA Existing Terminal Area Configuration

Aircraft Gates

Aircraft Hardstands

North Terminal 59 9

Central Terminal 47 3

South Terminal 26 4

TOTAL 132 16

4


4

MIA 2035 Terminal Area Configuration

Gates and Aircraft Hardstand Inventory

Aircraft Gates

Aircraft Hardstands

North Terminal 70 9

Central Terminal 39 0

South Terminal 24 4

TOTAL 133 13

D-West

D-East

New Landside Terminal South

New Landside Terminal North

Super G

Super E-Head

Super E-Connector

5 5

ACTIVITY SUMMARY

6


6

Future Design Day Flight Activity Summary

• Total operations (arrivals and departures) for a peak month-average day

Sources: MIA Airside Operations Division, Baseline Schedule; Central Terminal PDD Forecasts, May 2013; MIA Carriers Input, July 2013.

Carrier Group 2012 (Baseline) 2020 2025 2030 2035

AMR Carriers 1/ 665 841 899 959 1027

Other Domestic Carriers 82 119 130 144 158

oneworld 2/ 43 55 61 67 73

Foreign Flag Carriers 3/ 112 186 209 231 261

Nonscheduled 16 18 20 22 24

TOTAL 918 1,219 1,319 1,423 1,543 Notes: 1. AMR Carriers include American Eagle and US Airways. 2. Growth rates incorporates changes in oneworld Alliance members (e.g. Mexicana, TAM, airberlin) between 2009 and 2012. 3. Assumes air service by new international entrant carriers based on discussions with MDAD Marketing Division. 4. Average annual growth rates for carriers currently operating at MIA are:

i. AMR carriers and oneworld Partners: 3.0% to 2020 and 1.3% thereafter ii. All other carriers: 5.5% between 2012 and 2020 as a result of new entrant activity

anticipated by MDAD’s Marketing Division; 2.0% from 2020 through 2035;

7


7

MIA New Routes

• New Routes Opened in 2013 and 2014:

– Guadeloupe, French Antilles

– Martinique, French Antilles

– Calgary, Canada

– San Diego

– Curitiba, Brazil

– Porto Alegre, Brazil

– San Antonio

– Cozumel, Mexico

– Milan, Italy

– Frankfurt, Germany

– Viracopos, Brazil

– Austin

– Kansas City

– Salt Lake City

8


8

MIA New Entrants

• New Entrants in 2013 and 2014:

– XL Airways

– WestJet

– Jetairfly (Brussels)

– Qatar Airways (Doha)

– Air Europa (Madrid/Punta Cana)

• New Entrants Announced for 2014 and 2015:

– Frontier

– Finnair

– Thomas Cook Airlines

• New A380 flights by British Airways and Air France

• Additional new service/entrants expected for 2016 Olympics

9


9

Air Carrier Historical and Projected Statistics

Sources: MIA Airside Operations Division, Baseline Schedule; SMP Forecasts (approved by FAA on July 21, 2011); Central Terminal PDD Forecasts, May 2013; MIA Carriers Input, July 2013.

0

100,000

200,000

300,000

400,000

500,000

600,000

Air

Carr

ier

An

nu

al A

ircra

ft O

pera

tio

ns

Fiscal Year

Historical Air Carrier Operations

New Actual Data since Forecast Approval

SMP Operations Baseline Forecast - Low - AAGR*: 1.3%

SMP Operations Baseline Forecast - High - AAGR*: 2.3%

MIA PDD - Airline Derived Forecast - AAGR 2.3%

2010 A

ctu

al

2011 A

ctu

al

2012 A

ctu

al

2013 A

ctu

al

Notes: 1. AAGR* stands for Average Annual Growth Rate. 2. FAA FY2012 Terminal Area Forecast is not presented as it does not provide operations forecast for passenger aircraft specifically. 3. MIA Central Terminal Program Definition Document forecast was prepared in consultation with all airlines currently operating at MIA.

10 10

GATE AND HARDSTAND REQUIREMENTS

11


11

• Gate requirements by airline groups (144 total)

11

Gate Gauge RJ-S RJ-L NB WB JB NLA Total

American Airlines (AA) and oneworld Partners (OW) 0 0 44 1 23 1 69

AA + OW Spare Gates 0 0 4 0 3 0 7

Total Contact Gate Requirements AA + OW + Spares 0 0 48 1 26 1 76

American Eagle E175 Contact Gate Requirements 0 17 0 0 0 0 17

American Eagle E145 Ground Loaded Gate Requirements 2 0 0 0 0 0 2

Total Gate Requirements American Eagle 2 17 0 0 0 0 19

Other Airlines (OAL) 0 0 29 0 15 2 46

MDAD Controlled Gates / Spares 0 0 1 0 2 0 3

Total Contact Gate Requirements OAL + MDAD-Controlled Gates 0 0 30 0 17 2 49

Note: The gate requirements presented above assume a preferential use of the gates.

Gate Requirements - Year 2035 Gate Demand Summary

Source: MIA Central Terminal Program Definition Document Forecast, Ricondo & Associates, Inc., August 2013.

12


12

Gate Requirements - Year 2035 Hardstand Positions Demand Summary

• Hardstand positions by airline groups

Gate Gauge RJ-S RJ-L NB WB JB NLA Total

American Airlines and oneworld Partners 0 0 8 0 10 0 18

American Eagle 3 6 0 0 0 0 9

Total Hardstand Requirements AMR Carriers and oneworld 3 6 8 0 10 0 27

Other Airlines (OAL) 0 0 8 0 5 0 13

Source: MIA Central Terminal Program Definition Document Forecast, Ricondo & Associates, Inc., August 2013. 12

13 13

OTHER TERMINAL CAPITAL PROJECTS

14


14

Other MIA Terminal Capital Projects

14

Source: MIA Central Terminal Program Definition Document Analysis (Refined with Air Carriers 11/01/2013), Ricondo & Associates, November 2013.

15 15

TERMINAL CONCEPT

16


16

Central Terminal – Airside Refinements

16

Source: Pier Configuration Terminal Concept, Ricondo & Associates Inc., with MDAD Input, October 2013.

17 17

TERMINAL SPACE LAYOUT

18


18 18

Terminal Space Plan – Level One

Sources: Rodriguez & Quiroga Architect Chartered, May 2012; Bag Handling System Configuration, URS Corp., October 2013; Terminal Space Program, Ricondo & Associates, October 2013.

19


19 19

Terminal Space Plan – Level Two

Sources: Rodriguez & Quiroga Architect Chartered, May 2012; Terminal Space Program, Ricondo & Associates, October 2013.

20


20

Terminal Space Plan – Level Three

20


21


21

Terminal Space Plan – Level Four (Potential APM)


22


22

Terminal Support Functions

• Items requiring further coordination to be conducted as separate studies or during design include: – Hotel Replacement (including site study)

– Cruise ship passengers landside accommodation / processing

– MDAD and Federal agencies’ needs inside the terminal building

– Finalization of concession program

– Decision on, and programming of previously discussed commercial program (i.e. initially proposed for Levels 4, 5, and 6 of new Central Terminal)

– Decision on, and integration with North Terminal of Automated People Mover

22

23 23

TERMINAL CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING AND MILESTONES

SOUTH TO NORTH SEQUENCING

24


24

Construction Sequencing

Pre-construction Conditions Year: 2019

Sources: Terminal Construction Sequencing, Ricondo & Associates Inc., September 2013; Cost and Duration Estimates Adjusted for Refined Phases by Ricondo & Associates Inc. (approximated), URS Corp., December 2013 and U.S. Cost, April 2013.c

Note: revised from 2018 as shown in PDD by MDAD on June 2014.

25


25

Construction Sequencing (Cont’d)

Phase 1a (13 mo) Start Year: 2020

Concourse H Gate Upgrades and Internationalization

Sources: Terminal Construction Sequencing, Ricondo & Associates Inc., September 2013; Cost and Duration Estimates Adjusted for Refined Phases by Ricondo & Associates Inc. (approximated), URS Corp., December 2013 and U.S. Cost, April 2013.


26


26

Note: D-West is built within the total duration of Phase 1b.



Phase 1b (33 mo) Start Year: 2021


27


27

Phase 1c (2 mo) Start Year: 2024




28


28





29


29


Temporary connection to Super E using

Existing APM




30


30

Phase 2c (12 mo) Start Year: 2028




31


31

Phase 2d (9 mo) Start Year: 2029




32


32

Phase 2e (6 mo) Start Year: 2030




33


33

Phase 2f (10 mo) Start Year: 2030




34


34 34





35


35 35





36


36 36

FINAL Year: 2032




37 37

All years represent the start/commencement of the listed program elements except for the program completion milestone). All durations provided in years (yrs.).

Landside Terminal (North) Demolition (1.5 yr.)

New Landside Terminal (North) and Super E-Head Construction (4 yrs.)

New Super E Connector Construction (1 yr.)

Central Terminal Redevelopment Program Completion

Concourse G and Landside (South) Terminal Demolition (1 yr.)

Super G and New Landside Terminal (South) Construction (3 yrs.)

2020 2021 2024 2026 2028 2031

Lower E Demolition (0.5 yr.)

2032

Concourse F Demolition (0.5 yr.)

2030

Milestone Schedule

Sources: Terminal Construction Sequencing, Ricondo & Associates Inc., September 2013; Cost Duration Estimates Adjusted for Refined Phases by Ricondo & Associates Inc. (approximated), URS Corp., December 2013 and U.S. Cost, April 2013.


38


38

80

90

100

110

120

130

140

Gat

es

Central Terminal Sequencing Period

Total Gate Capacity Gate Requirements Gate + Spare Requirements

Construction Gate Capacity vs Demand

Sources: Terminal Construction Sequencing, Ricondo & Associates Inc., September 2013; Cost and Duration Estimates Adjusted for New Phases by Ricondo & Associates Inc. (approximated), URS Corp., December 2013.

Ce

ntr

al T

erm

inal

C

on

stru

ctio

n C

om

me

nce

me

nt

2E

EXISTING 0 1A 1B 2A 2B 2C 2F 3A 3B 3C 1C 2D

Commuter Terminal Demolition

Concourse G Demolition

Super G Opening

D-West Opening

E-Head Opening

Notes: 1. Some phases may overlap, but it is not shown here for clarity. 2. Upon completion, it is assumed that the Central Terminal is operated as a

common use facility to protect the spare gate requirements and accommodate the gate demand.

3. Gate capacity includes considerations for North Terminal enabling projects,

See Note 2

39 39

PROGRAM COST ESTIMATES

40


40

Central Terminal Construction Cost Estimates

Phase Item Estimated Construction

Costs (2012 Dollars) Duration (Months)

Projected Start Year

Estimated Loaded Costs (2012 Dollars)

Escalated and Loaded Costs

0 Build Passenger Connector $52,333,815 24 2016 $71,958,995 $83,420,197

1A Demo Concourse G/ Terminal South $59,767,606 13 2018 $82,180,458 $101,071,598

1B Build Super G/ Terminal South $571,642,669 33 2019 $786,008,670 $995,692,267

1C Apron $5,063,924 2 2022 $6,962,896 $9,357,550

2A Demo Central Terminal North $128,538,929 18 2022 $176,741,027 $244,650,916

2B Build New Central (N) and Super E $1,104,406,734 29 2024 $1,518,559,259 $2,230,055,467

2C Build Super E Connector Building $240,222,745 12 2026 $330,306,275 $499,617,878

2D Demo Concourse E Lower $24,908,421 6 2027 $34,249,079 $53,358,949

2E Apron $16,026,570 10 2027 $22,036,533 $35,362,167

3A Demo Concourse F $22,766,757 6 2028 $31,304,291 $50,234,197

3B Apron $17,497,901 5 2029 $24,059,613 $38,608,616

TOTAL $2,243,176,070 $3,084,367,096 $4,341,429,802

Notes: 1. Total soft costs before escalation assumed to be 37.50%. 2. Escalation is calculated to the mid-point of each phase using a 3% rate, as recommended by U.S. Cost. 3. Excludes costs for proposed triturator, gas station, bus station, NTD and Concourse H gate upgrades and enabling projects, and potential Automated People Mover.


41 41

RENDERINGS

42


42

View from North

43


43

View from South

44


44

Next Steps

• MDAD to undertake financial planning for incremental implementation of the Central Terminal Program and other terminal capital projects.

45 45

QUESTIONS

MIA Central Terminal Redevelopment Program presentation, November 19, 2014

Government & Nonprofit

Transcript of MIA Central Terminal Redevelopment Program presentation, November 19, 2014