Metode Konstruksi Reklamasi Pantai
-
Upload
hosea-luahambowo -
Category
Documents
-
view
145 -
download
44
description
Transcript of Metode Konstruksi Reklamasi Pantai
-
Construction Method
Construction Method
-
Agenda Main Dike Construction Overview of Main Dike Alternatives Analysis Recommended Alternative
Construction Sequence
-
Dike Alternatives Analysis VPA Requested an Evaluation of
Alternatives
Reduce Cost?
Reduce Sand Required?
Improve Constructability?
Minimize Future Settlements?
-
Main Dike Alternatives
Over 20 Alternatives were Considered for the Main Dike/Retaining Structure
11 Determined Technically Preferable
-
Technically PreferableB1 Rock/Sand Dike, pre-dredge soft claysB2 Rock/Sand Dike, pre-dredge to -65 feet, Deep Soil Mixing to -100 feet +/-
D1 Partial Height Concrete Caisson, pre-dredge to -100, backfill with sand/rock to -60, place caisson
D2 Partial Height Concrete Caisson, with deep soil mixing D3 Partial Height Concrete Caisson, with sand backfillE1 Cellular Cofferdam, pre-dredge to -100, backfill (sand/rock) to -60, install steel
sheets.
E2 Cellular Cofferdam, with deep soil mixingF1 Combi-Wall, with deep soil mixingF2 Portal Frame, with deep soil mixing outside toeF3 Portal Frame, with deep soil mixing outside and insideF4 Portal Frame, with link beam, no DSM
Dike Alternatives Evaluated
-
Base CaseDike Section (as Presented in Feasibility Report)
Yorktown Formation(Dense Silty Sand)
Foundation(Soft Clay)
Sand FillDredged Fill
Rip Rap
700 Ft. (213 m)
14 Million CY of Sand Pre-Dredge to -60
-
Rock/Sand Dikes
-
Rock/Sand Dike Alternative B1
Yorktown FormationFoundation(Soft Clay)
Pre-Dredge
Pre-dredge -80 to -130
-
Sand FillQuarry Run Rock
Rock/Sand DikeAlternative B1
-
Surcharge
Pile Supported Wharf
Dredge Fill
Rock/Sand DikeAlternative B1
-
Rock/Sand Dike On DSMAlternative B
Yorktown FormationFoundation(Soft Clay)
Pre-Dredge Bathtubfor DSM Equipment
Deep Soil Mixed Zone
Deep Soil Mixed Pattern
Plan
-
Quarry Run Rock
Rock/Sand Dike On DSMAlternative B
-
Precast Concrete CaissonsAlternatives D1, D2 and D3
Deltaport , Vancouver Port Authority
-
Precast Concrete Caissons
-
Sand Fill
Quarry Run Rock
Partial Height Caisson On Rock FillAlternative D1
Pre-dredge -80 to -130
-
Concrete Caisson
Partial Height Caisson On Rock FillAlternative D1
-
Yorktown Formation(Dense Silty Sand)
Foundation(Soft Clay)
Sand Fill
Dredge FillQuarry Run Rock
Concrete Caisson
Partial Height Caisson On Rock FillAlternative D1
-
Concrete CaissonOn Rock Pad
Partial Height Caisson On DSMAlternative D2
Pre-Dredge After DSMDeep Soil Mixed Zone
-
Sand FillDredge Fill Quarry Run Rock
Concrete Caisson
Partial Height Caisson On DSMAlternative D2
-
Sand Fill
Quarry Run Rock
Partial Height Caisson Sand FillAlternative D3
Pre-dredge -80 to -130
-
Sand Fill
Quarry Run Rock
Concrete Caisson
Partial Height Caisson Sand FillAlternative D3
-
Cellular Cofferdams Alternatives E1 and E2
-
Sand Fill
Sand Fill
Cellular Cofferdam
Cellular CofferdamAlternative E1
Pre-dredge -80 to -130
-
Sand FillDredge Fill
Surcharge
Cellular CofferdamAlternative E1
-
Cellular Cofferdam On DSM Alternative E2
Yorktown FormationFoundation(Soft Clay)
Pre-Dredge Bathtubfor DSM Equipment
Deep Soil Mixed Zone
-
Sand FillDredge Fill
Surcharge
Cellular Cofferdam On DSM Alternative E2
Cellular Cofferdam
-
Combi-Wall
-
Pre-Dredge After DSMDeep Soil Mixed Zone
Combi-Wall With DSMAlternative F1
Combi-Wall
-
Sand Fill
Combi-Wall With DSMAlternative F1
-
Install CIP Pile Cap and P/S Conc Sheet
Pile Wall
Portal Frame With Partial DSMAlternative F2
Install 72 Dia. Steel Pipe Piles
-
Pre-Dredge After DSMDeep Soil Mixed Zone
Portal Frame With Partial DSMAlternative F2
-
Sand FillDredge Fill
Surcharge
Portal Frame With Partial DSMAlternative F2
-
Deep Soil Mixed Zone
Portal Frame With DSMAlternative F3
CIP Pile Cap and AZ26 Sheet Pile Wall
54 Dia. P/S Conc. Piles
-
Alternative F3Portal Frame With DSM
Sand FillDredge Fill
Surcharge
-
Cast Link Beam (El. -15)
Cast Pile Caps
Install P/S Conc Sheet Pile Wall
Portal Frame With Link BeamAlternative F4
72 Dia. Steel Pipe Piles for Portal Frame
-
Alternative F4Portal Frame With Link Beam
Sand FillDredge Fill
Surcharge
Wick Drains
-
Evaluation of Alternatives
Technical Feasible Alternatives Were: Ranked by Cost Evaluated by Risk
-
Factors to Evaluate Risk1. Price Risk.
Materials and/or labor fluctuations
2. Constructability & Precedence.
Difficulty to construct.
3. Material Sourcing (Sand/Rock).
Construction materials availability.
4. Permit Risk.
Potential to delay permit process.
-
Factors to Evaluate Risk5. Schedule Risk.
Hold-up rapid filling of cell.
6. Impact on Dredged Material Capacity.
Net storage capacity of Craney
7. Design Life.
Design life / maintenance requirements.
-
Costs / Risks
Short Name
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
C
o
s
t
-
N
o
W
h
a
r
f
P
r
i
c
e
R
i
s
k
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
&
P
r
e
c
e
d
e
n
c
e
M
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
S
o
u
r
c
i
n
g
(
s
a
n
d
/
r
o
c
k
)
P
e
r
m
i
t
R
i
s
k
S
c
h
e
d
u
l
e
R
i
s
k
I
m
p
a
c
t
o
n
D
r
e
d
g
e
M
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
C
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
D
e
s
i
g
n
L
i
f
e
A
v
g
.
R
i
s
k
B1 Rock/Sand $ 563,568,614 1 1 4 3 1 5 1 2.3B2 Rock/DSM $ 767,100,826 4 3 2 5 5 1 1 3.0D1 Caisson/Rock $ 746,844,645 2 2 5 3 1 5 2 2.9D2 Caisson/DSM $ 992,479,519 5 5 3 5 5 1 2 3.7D3 Caisson/Sand $ 707,159,632 2 2 5 2 1 5 2 2.7E1 Steel Cellular $ 631,847,815 4 4 5 2 1 5 5 3.7E2 Cellular/DSM $ 828,473,261 5 5 3 5 5 1 5 4.1F1 Combi-Wall $ 944,660,155 4 3 1 3 3 1 5 2.9F2 Portal Frame F2 $ 917,336,324 4 4 1 3 3 1 4 2.9F3 Portal Frame F3 $ 660,094,688 5 5 1 4 4 1 5 3.6F4 Portal Frame F4 $ 767,486,860 3 3 1 1 1 1 4 2.0
-
B1 Rock/Sand
B2 Rock/DSMD1 Caisson/Rock
D2 Caisson/DSM
D3 Caisson/SandE1 Steel Cellular
E2 Cellular/DSM
F1 Combi-WallF2 Portal Frame
F3 Portal Frame
F4 Portal Frame
$500,000,000
$600,000,000
$700,000,000
$800,000,000
$900,000,000
$1,000,000,000
$1,100,000,000
1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0
(less risk) - + (more risk)
C
o
s
t
(
8
,
5
0
0
L
F
)
(
B
a
s
e
d
o
n
A
s
s
u
m
e
d
S
u
b
s
u
r
f
a
c
e
i
n
P
h
a
s
e
1
)
Cost vs Risks
-
Main Dike Alternatives Report
Main Dike Alternatives Analysis Report Available for Download:
http://craneyisland.info/Contractors.html
-
Agenda Main Dike Construction Overview of Main Dike Alternatives Analysis Recommended Alternative
Construction Sequence
-
CIDMMA
Shipping Channel
-
Existing Conditions
-
Pre-Dredging
Current Design Rock/Sand Dike
15.7 MCY Pre-Dredge (Total Length)
-
Main Dike Construction
Current Design Rock/Sand Dike6.3 MCY Sand(Total Length)
-
Cross Dike Construction
Dredge Depth After Construction
-
Pre-Dredging to the North
-
Filling South Cell
6.5 MCY
-
Construct North Dike
-
Filling North Cell
12.5 MCY
-
Achieving Final Grade
Above +1825 MCY
CIEE South & North Cell
-
Access Channel Dredging
8.3 MCY
-
Conclusion - Dikes
Component Quantity
Pre-Dredging 15.7 MCY
Access Channel Dredging 8.3 MCY
Sand Fill - Main Dike 6.3 MCY
Sand Fill - Cross Dikes 4.5 MCY
Quarry Run Rock 6.3 Million Tons
Rock/Sand Dike for Main Dike Dredging, Sand and Rock Volumes
Construction Method AgendaDike Alternatives AnalysisMain Dike AlternativesDike Alternatives EvaluatedBase CaseDike Section (as Presented in Feasibility Report)Rock/Sand DikesRock/Sand Dike Alternative B1Rock/Sand Dike Alternative B1Rock/Sand Dike Alternative B1Rock/Sand Dike On DSMAlternative BRock/Sand Dike On DSMAlternative BPrecast Concrete CaissonsAlternatives D1, D2 and D3Precast Concrete CaissonsCellular Cofferdams Alternatives E1 and E2Combi-WallEvaluation of AlternativesFactors to Evaluate RiskFactors to Evaluate RiskCosts / RisksCost vs RisksMain Dike Alternatives ReportAgendaCIDMMAExisting ConditionsPre-DredgingMain Dike ConstructionCross Dike ConstructionPre-Dredging to the NorthFilling South CellConstruct North DikeFilling North CellAchieving Final GradeAccess Channel DredgingConclusion - Dikes