Methods of Research Chapter 3 Research at Philosophical Level .ppt

download Methods of Research Chapter 3 Research at Philosophical Level .ppt

of 17

Transcript of Methods of Research Chapter 3 Research at Philosophical Level .ppt

  • 8/16/2019 Methods of Research Chapter 3 Research at Philosophical Level .ppt

    1/17

    Prof. ir . Panchito M. Labay

  • 8/16/2019 Methods of Research Chapter 3 Research at Philosophical Level .ppt

    2/17

    What is a positivist, a

    post-modernist and a

    feminist point of view?

    What is qualitative,

    quantitative & mied

    methods of research?

  • 8/16/2019 Methods of Research Chapter 3 Research at Philosophical Level .ppt

    3/17

    • help the researcher to refine

    and specify his or herresearch point of view or

    philosophical underpinnin!s•  enable the researcher to

    evaluate different methodolo-

    !ies and methods to avoid

    inappropriate use and

    unnecessary wor" by

    identifyin! the limitations of

    particular approaches at an

    early sta!e•  help the researcher to becreative and innovative in

    either selection or adaptation

    of methods that were

    previously outside his or her

    eperience.

    Its me when I was assigned to do a research work

    in John Hopkins University with my Ugandan

    classmate.

  • 8/16/2019 Methods of Research Chapter 3 Research at Philosophical Level .ppt

    4/17

    #here are three ma$or philoso-

    phical schools that affect theconduct of doin! research%

    P'(#()('# *cornerstone of

    traditional science+stresses thatscience as ‘knowledge’ is

    ascertained by empiricalobservations & experimentations. It

    has an objectivist view that ‘acts’ or

    ‘realities’ are not the res!lts o

    h!man cognition or thinking or

    created in one’s mind. "hey are

    external to the observer and areimposed on the observer’s

    conscio!sness rom witho!t.

    It preers meas!rement and

    replicability and making generali# 

    sations rather than speciicobservations.

  • 8/16/2019 Methods of Research Chapter 3 Research at Philosophical Level .ppt

    5/17

    (t follows the scientific method%

    Problem

    #heory

    ypothesis

    perimentation/ata !atherin!

    Provin!

  • 8/16/2019 Methods of Research Chapter 3 Research at Philosophical Level .ppt

    6/17

    0hallen!es to the positivist 1 scientific 1ob$ectivist views%

    2. #ruth or reality is a social construct*sub$ectivism+, created by human bein!s& the ob$ects of thou!ht are merelywords *nominalism+ produced by thelan!ua!e we spea" *a narrative,discourse, etc.+.

    3. 4ealities are comple, which cannot bereduced to measurable 5simplevariables6 and therefore inappropriate tocome up with !eneral !overnin! theory.Lo!ocentrism is not truethere is nosuch absolute truth.

    7. periments conducted in laboratoriesare becomin! redundant, because onecannot really capture the essence of thenatural world. #hou!h positivist is!uided by rationality, but rationalityitself is a product of social fabrications.

    8. Positivism is a he!emonic idea thatsuppresses other forms of "nowled!es.

    $!perman is a creative social constr!ct%

    which pres!med can be made in the

    laboratories thro!gh the science o cloning

    or genetics engineering 

  • 8/16/2019 Methods of Research Chapter 3 Research at Philosophical Level .ppt

    7/17

    • scientific fraud is etremely

    widespread, even in most

    industrialised countries.

    • biased and sub$ective nature of

    scientists as human bein!s

    • material need for !lory and honour,!ainin! more !rants and pressure to

    publish outputs

    • doin! the eperimentation over and

    over a!ain to !et the 5desired6 results

    • the nature of some researchers that

    there is 5no presti!e in re-doin! other

    researcher6s eperiments. #herefore

    the ris" of doin! fraudulent wor" is

    very little.

    History reveals that greatscientists like Ptolemy,Galileo, Newton, Daltonand Mendell all tamperedsome of their researchdata.

    Source Sutherland, !"#"

  • 8/16/2019 Methods of Research Chapter 3 Research at Philosophical Level .ppt

    8/17

    Post-positivist believes that pure

    empiricism, e.!., derivin! "nowled!eonly throu!h observation and

    measurement, is not enou!h. #hus, post-

    positivism is built on the concept of

    critical realism, that there is a real world

    o!t there independent o o!r perceptiono it. 

    (t posits that 9data are not inherently

    '!antitative and cannot be bits and

     pieces o almost anything :. 

    #he  metaphysical as being beyond the

    scope o science% it was increasingly

    accepted by post#positivists  that

    althou!h a real world driven by natural

    causes eists, it is impossible for

    humans to truly perceive it with theirim erfect sensor and mental ca acit .

    (instein is not only a positivist b!t also

    a post#positivist & post#modernist 

  • 8/16/2019 Methods of Research Chapter 3 Research at Philosophical Level .ppt

    9/17

    #he post-positivist approaches

    assume that reality is m!ltiple%s!bjective, and mentally

    constr!cted   by individuals. #he

    use of fleible and multiple

    methods is desirable as a way of

    studyin! a small sample in depthover time that can establish

    warranted assertability as

    opposed to absolute truth. #he

    researcher interacts with those

    bein! researched, and findin!s

    are the outcome of this

    interactive process with a focus

    on

    ‘)ntipo’ is a c!lt!ral practice d!ring *enten

    $eason% which is a good s!bject or research

    ollowing the post#positivist mode o in'!iry.

  • 8/16/2019 Methods of Research Chapter 3 Research at Philosophical Level .ppt

    10/17

    Letourneau and ;llen *2

  • 8/16/2019 Methods of Research Chapter 3 Research at Philosophical Level .ppt

    11/17

    (t follows the inductive method%

    Problem

    0ontetualisin!(ntrospection

    #heory@ieldwor" 1

    /ata !atherin!

  • 8/16/2019 Methods of Research Chapter 3 Research at Philosophical Level .ppt

    12/17

    P'#-M/4A('#'!estions the

    belie in reason & rationality o the positivist. It arg!es that ‘reality’ is a

    social constr!ct in the orm o words

    lang!age% stories% narratives% disco!rses%

    etc.

    It avo!rs observation rom the inside in

    avo!r o ‘vision’% in which the researcher

    and the observed are not clearly

    disting!ished. "h!s% the researcher is the

    ‘prime instr!ment’.

    It preers an introspective% s!bjective

    interpretation.

    It dissolves the bo!ndaries between

    disciplines% since ‘realities’ can be drawn

    rom dierent angles +relativism &

    methodological pl!ralism,. -reativity will

    grow i this will not be p!t inside the‘black box’.

    rokeback /o!ntain speaks abo!t reality 

  • 8/16/2019 Methods of Research Chapter 3 Research at Philosophical Level .ppt

    13/17

    Buestions to the post-modernist

    views%

    2. 4ise of 5"nowled!e anarchy6, a

    disorder world of eplainin! a

    social, natural, physical, etc.

    phenomena. 4e$ects meta- and

    !rand narratives of the world andreinforces our sensitivity to

    differences.

    3. #he rules of lo!ic are nothin!, but

    all social construct that are

    prescribed for ways of thin"in!.7. (t is a counter he!emonic concept

    to positivism that demystifies the

    rhetorical acceptance of modern

    science."he problem o traditional science in solving some o

    o!r present problems gives rise to post#positivist and post#modernist points o view.

  • 8/16/2019 Methods of Research Chapter 3 Research at Philosophical Level .ppt

    14/17

    'CMDL(0 (A#4;0#(A('#

    ollows the post#modernistview’% both in theory and practice%

    b!t is more concerned on

    explaining society in terms o its

    overall str!ct!re.

    It believes that we are living in a

    ‘semiotic world’% whereinsymbols and comm!nication

    +ling!istic & gest!ral, are created

    and given with ‘meanings’ &

    identities in all o!r daily

    interactions with o!r

    environments.

    It !pholds the ca!se & eect

    analysis to describe social reality

    rom within% like in interpreting

    the views% eelings and actions o

    those involved in a givensit!ation or liestyle.

    0e live in a world o words% lang!ages% signs andstr!ct!res which we give them identities and meanings.

  • 8/16/2019 Methods of Research Chapter 3 Research at Philosophical Level .ppt

    15/17

    @M(A('#ollows ‘tradi# 

    tional science’% both intheory and practice b!t

    sho!ld be air to women.

    It is an emerging philoso# 

     phical school g!ided by

    eminist theory. It is reallynot a method% b!t a

     perspective that recog# 

    nises diversity% open to

    cross discipline% so as to

    avoid the ‘marginalisation’

    o women.

    0omen need not be conined only in

    ho!sehold chores% b!t m!st also a part

    o social change

  • 8/16/2019 Methods of Research Chapter 3 Research at Philosophical Level .ppt

    16/17

    #he scientific ethos of research prevails

    as of today and still survives due to

    the followin! ideals%

    Eniversalism. (deas and bodies of

    "nowled!e must be evaluated on thebasis of merit that it established.

    0ommunalism. Fnowled!e is not

    "nowled!e if it is not shared, because

    the search for "nowled!e is a human

    act for public use.'"epticism. ne6s wor" must be

    scrutiniGed and challen!ed. 'cientific

    authority must be appraised and

    reappraised re!ularly.

    mpiricism. bservations of the natural

    and social worlds are based on facts

    that can be apprehended by human6s

    senses.

    (mpartiality. 'cientists must have a

    sense of impartiality and open-

    mindedness.

  • 8/16/2019 Methods of Research Chapter 3 Research at Philosophical Level .ppt

    17/17

    #han" you, because we have $ust

    finished 0hapter 7

    #E#4 M;4F/ ;0#()(#C

    @or the inte!ration of all concepts, please do the followin! activities%

    2. (n the internet *www.!oo!le.com+ , search for two published

    research papers that applied the concepts of a positivist, a post-modernist or a feminist.

    3. (n no more than HH words describe their peculiarities.

    /ate of submission%

    http://www.google.com/http://www.google.com/