Methane Poster

1
7/28/2019 Methane Poster http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/methane-poster 1/1 Offsetting Ongoing Methane Emissions — An Alternative to Emission Metrics A. Lauder 1 , I. G. Enting 2 , J. O. Carter 3 , N. Clisby 2 , A. L. Cowie 4 , B. K. Henry 5 , M. R. Raupach 6 (presenter) 1 Carbon Grazing, Queensland, 2 MASCOS, The University of Melbourne (corresponding author: [email protected]), 3 Department of Science, Information Technology, Innovation and the Arts, Queensland, 4 Rural Climate Solutions, University of New England/NSW Department of Primary Industries, 5 IFE, Queensland University of Technology, 6 CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research, ACT. Summary Propose methane offset approach to avoid widely recognised difficulties with Global Warming Potential (GWP). Offset on-going emissions of 0.9 to 1.05 kg of methane per year and one-off emissions of 1 tonne of carbon. Close equivalence in terms of resultant radiative forcing for time scales from decades to centuries. Our approach represents an approximate solution to the Forcing Equivalence Index (FEI). Proposed approach may provide an attractive mechanism for offsetting methane emissions from rangeland systems. Accepted for publication in The International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control . GWP and methane Equivalence between greenhouse gases is usually expressed in terms of radiative forcing, often referenced to CO 2 . Concentration-equivalence is defined in terms of instantaneous radiative forcing Emission-equivalence is defined in terms of time-integrated radiative forcing: A choice of ‘time-horizon’ for integral is required; Ratios relative to CO2 define Global Warming Potentials (GWPs); GWPs define ‘Emission-equivalence’ in the Kyoto Protocol. The ‘perturbation lifetime’ for methane in the atmosphere is approximately 12 years, whereas CO 2 has an unbounded lifetime. The consequence of this is starkly illustrated in the figure to the right: equivalence in time-integrated radiative forcing between pulse emissions of CO 2 and methane at one time-scale results in large discrepancies at other time-scales. For example, the integrated radiative forcing due to a GWP-100 equivalent emission of methane is much higher than that of CO 2 for times of less than 100 years, and is equally bad in the opposite direction for longer times. Many studies have criticised the use of GWPs as an ‘emission-equivalence’ metric due to this lack of robustness over a range of time-scales. e.g. large differences in outcomes of ‘CO 2 -equivalent’ scenarios [4]. This sort of problem is a generic issue for metrics which attempt to define equivalent pulse emissions of CO 2 and methane. In particular, ‘emission-equivalance’ is not appropriate for stabilisation of radiative forcing: CO 2 requires a cap on cumulative emissions while methane requires a cap on the rate of on-going emissions [5]. 0 100 200 300 400 500 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 Time (years)     W    a     t     t     /    m     2       ×    y    r Integrated forcing from pulses 1 Gt CO2 CH4 (20yr equiv) CH4 (100yr equiv) CH4 (500yr equiv) Other approaches Analysis of stabilisation of radiative forcing in terms of capping cumulative CO 2 emissions [1, 3]. Broader analysis in terms of caps on cumulative emissions of CO 2 and N 2 O, and caps on ongoing emissions of methane in the context of stabilisation [5]. Enting et al. (report for Garnaut review of climate change, 2008) proposed the use of 500-year GWPs as a compromise between 100 years (planning horizon) and the infinite time scale of stabilisation. The most important antecedent is the Forcing Equivalent Index’ (FEI) noted by Wigley [6] The FEI is defined via the following inverse problem: Given a pulse emission of gas A, what time profile of emissions of gas B would result in the same forcing? (at all times) The FEI of the CO 2  –methane case is closely examined in Manning and Reisinger [2]. Our proposal Equivalence between a pulse CO 2 release CO2 and on-going methane emissions is CH4:ongoing = CO2 CH4 eff τ CH4 CO2 or the converse: CO2 = CH4 CO2 τ CH4 eff CH4:ongoing where τ CH4 is perturbation lifetime of methane; is forcing per kg of gas ; eff is long-term mean CO 2 impulse response. As can be seen in the figures to the right, this new notion of equivalence defined by the single parameter eff allows for close equivalence for both radiative forcing and integrated radiative forcing of methane and CO 2 emissions. The choice of eff to be either 0.30 or 0.35 would depend on how conservative one wishes to be in offsetting methane emissions. We introduce an additional parameter, τ , as the e-folding time of carbon sequestration, as the example we have in mind is the sequestration of carbon via tree planting to offset ongoing methane emissions. The choice τ = 40 is sensible in this context, and allows for even closer equivalence. This case is the ‘lagged’ CO 2 emission shown in the graphs. This approach was previously proposed as the ‘Lauder calculator’, but is here refined by the introduction of eff . Our new approach provides an approximate solution to the FEI problem for methane and CO 2 which is convenient and accurate. 0 100 200 300 400 0.0000 0.0005 0.0010 0.0015 Time (years)     W    a     t     t     /    m     2 Forcing: ongoing CH 4 cf one−off CO 2 1 Gt CO2 (pulse) 1 Gt CO2 (lagged) ongoing CH4 (Reff = 0.3) ongoing CH4 (Reff = 0.35) 0 100 200 300 400 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 Time (years) Integrated forcing: ongoing CH 4 cf one−off CO 2     W    a     t     t     /    m       ×    y    r 1 Gt CO2 (pulse) 1 Gt CO2 (lagged) ongoing CH4 (Reff = 0.3) ongoing CH4 (Reff = 0.35) Rangeland systems Key idea: offset ongoing methane emissions of rangeland cattle by sequestering carbon through tree planting. Why is this desirable? Very sparse grazing, low quality feed – little management of herd and little scope for management changes. Methane is how ruminants get rid of hydrogen – little scope for major change in biochemistry. Thus, offsets are more practical than abatement. Applying offsets within a single agricultural unit increases transparency. Applicability of this approach depends on contexts: Agents (farmers through to nations) seeking to be climate-neutral. Agents acting within a GWP-based regulatory system. Global community seeking to mitigate human influence on climate. Details for typical rangeland: 10 hectares/animal (10 animals per km 2 ). 5.5kg methane per hectare per year must be offset by 6.1 tonnes carbon storage. Offsetting ongoing methane emissions requires (re-)planting 20% of grazing area. Rangeland habitats at Swan’s Lagoon, near Townsville, Qld, Australia. Images due to Meat and Livestock Australia. Acknowledgements The Australian Research Council funded the Centre of Excellence for Mathematics and Statistics (MASCOS). Ian Enting’s fellowship at MASCOS was supported by CSIRO through a sponsorship agreement. Meat and Livestock Australia has funded some of the interaction between the collaborators in this project. References [1]M. R. Allen et al. Nature , 458:1163–1166, 2009. [2] M. Manning and A. Reisinger. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A, 369:1891–1905, 2011. [3] H. D. Matthews and K. Caldeira. Geophys. Res. Lett., 35:L04705, 2008. [4]J. Reilly et al. Nature , 401:549–555, 1999. [5]S. M. Smith et al. Nature Clim. Change , 2:535–538, 2012. [6] T. M. L. Wigley. Geophys. Res. Lett., 25:2285–2288, 1998.

Transcript of Methane Poster

Page 1: Methane Poster

7/28/2019 Methane Poster

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/methane-poster 1/1

Offsetting Ongoing Methane Emissions — An Alternative to Emission MetricsA. Lauder1, I. G. Enting2 , J. O. Carter3, N. Clisby2, A. L. Cowie4, B. K. Henry5, M. R. Raupach6 (presenter)

1Carbon Grazing, Queensland, 2MASCOS, The University of Melbourne (corresponding author: [email protected]), 3Department of Science, Information Technology, Innovation and the Arts, Queensland, 4Rural Climate Solutions, University of NewEngland/NSW Department of Primary Industries, 5IFE, Queensland University of Technology, 6CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research, ACT.

Summary

Propose methane offset approach toavoid widely recognised difficulties withGlobal Warming Potential (GWP).

Offset on-going emissions of 0.9 to 1.05kg of methane per year and one-offemissions of 1 tonne of carbon.

Close equivalence in terms of resultantradiative forcing for time scales fromdecades to centuries.

Our approach represents an approximatesolution to the Forcing Equivalence Index(FEI).

Proposed approach may provide anattractive mechanism for offsettingmethane emissions from rangeland

systems.Accepted for publication in The International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control .

GWP and methane

Equivalence between greenhouse gasesis usually expressed in terms of radiativeforcing, often referenced to CO2.

Concentration-equivalence is defined interms of instantaneous radiative forcingEmission-equivalence is defined in termsof time-integrated radiative forcing:

A choice of ‘time-horizon’ for integral is required;

Ratios relative to CO2 define Global Warming

Potentials (GWPs);

GWPs define ‘Emission-equivalence’ in the

Kyoto Protocol.

The ‘perturbation lifetime’ for methane inthe atmosphere is approximately 12 years,whereas CO2 has an unbounded lifetime.The consequence of this is starklyillustrated in the figure to the right:equivalence in time-integrated radiativeforcing between pulse emissions of CO 2

and methane at one time-scale results inlarge discrepancies at other time-scales.For example, the integrated radiative forcingdue to a GWP-100 equivalent emission ofmethane is much higher than that of CO 2

for times of less than 100 years, and isequally bad in the opposite direction forlonger times.

Many studies have criticised the use ofGWPs as an ‘emission-equivalence’ metricdue to this lack of robustness over a rangeof time-scales.

e.g. large differences in outcomes of‘CO2-equivalent’ scenarios [4].

This sort of problem is a generic issue formetrics which attempt to define equivalentpulse emissions of CO2 and methane.

In particular, ‘emission-equivalance’ is not 

appropriate for stabilisation of radiativeforcing: CO2 requires a cap on cumulativeemissions while methane requires a capon the rate of on-going emissions [5].

0 100 200 300 400 500

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

Time (years)

    W   a    t    t    /   m

    2      ×

   y   r

Integrated forcing from pulses

1 Gt CO2

CH4 (20yr equiv)

CH4 (100yr equiv)CH4 (500yr equiv)

Other approaches

Analysis of stabilisation of radiativeforcing in terms of capping cumulativeCO2 emissions [1, 3].

Broader analysis in terms of caps oncumulative emissions of CO2 and N2O,and caps on ongoing emissions ofmethane in the context of stabilisation [5].

Enting et al. (report for Garnaut review ofclimate change, 2008) proposed the useof 500-year GWPs as a compromisebetween 100 years (planning horizon) andthe infinite time scale of stabilisation.

The most important antecedent is the‘Forcing Equivalent Index’ (FEI) noted byWigley [6]

The FEI is defined via the followinginverse problem: Given a pulse emissionof gas A, what time profile of emissions ofgas B would result in the same forcing?(at all times)

The FEI of the CO2 –methane case isclosely examined in Manning andReisinger [2].

Our proposal

Equivalence between a pulse CO2 release ∆CO2 and on-going methane emissionsis

E CH4:ongoing =a CO2a CH4

R eff τ CH4

∆CO2

or the converse:

∆CO2 =a CH4a CO2

τ CH4

R eff E CH4:ongoing

whereτ CH4 is perturbation lifetime of methane;

a X  is forcing per kg of gas X ;

R eff  is long-term mean CO2 impulse response.

As can be seen in the figures to the right, this new notion of equivalence definedby the single parameter R eff allows for close equivalence for both radiativeforcing and integrated radiative forcing of methane and CO2 emissions. Thechoice of R eff  to be either 0.30 or 0.35 would depend on how conservative onewishes to be in offsetting methane emissions.

We introduce an additional parameter, τ , as the e-folding time of carbonsequestration, as the example we have in mind is the sequestration of carbonvia tree planting to offset ongoing methane emissions.

The choice τ  = 40 is sensible in this context, and allows for even closerequivalence. This case is the ‘lagged’ CO2 emission shown in the graphs.

This approach was previously proposed as the ‘Lauder calculator’, but is hererefined by the introduction of R eff .

Our new approach provides an approximate solution to the FEI problem for methane and CO 2 which is convenient and accurate.

0 100 200 300 400

0.0000

0.0005

0.0010

0.0015

Time (years)

    W   a    t    t    /   m

    2

Forcing: ongoing CH4 cf one−off CO2

1 Gt CO2 (pulse)

1 Gt CO2 (lagged)

ongoing CH4 (Reff = 0.3)

ongoing CH4 (Reff = 0.35)

0 100 200 300 4000.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

Time (years)

Integrated forcing: ongoing CH4 cf one−off CO2

    W   a    t    t    /   m

      ×   y   r

1 Gt CO2 (pulse)

1 Gt CO2 (lagged)

ongoing CH4 (Reff = 0.3)

ongoing CH4 (Reff = 0.35)

Rangeland systems

Key idea: offset ongoing methane emissions of rangeland cattle by sequesteringcarbon through tree planting. Why is this desirable?

Very sparse grazing, low quality feed – little management of herd and little scope formanagement changes.

Methane is how ruminants get rid of hydrogen – little scope for major change inbiochemistry.

Thus, offsets are more practical than abatement.

Applying offsets within a single agricultural unit increases transparency.

Applicability of this approach depends on contexts:

Agents (farmers through to nations) seeking to be climate-neutral.

Agents acting within a GWP-based regulatory system.Global community seeking to mitigate human influence on climate.

Details for typical rangeland:

10 hectares/animal (10 animals per km2).

5.5kg methane per hectare per year must be offset by 6.1 tonnes carbon storage.

⇒ Offsetting ongoing methane emissions requires (re-)planting 20% of grazing area.

Rangeland habitats at Swan’s Lagoon, near Townsville, Qld, Australia. Images due to Meat and Livestock Australia.

Acknowledgements

The Australian Research Council funded the Centre of Excellencefor Mathematics and Statistics (MASCOS). Ian Enting’s fellowshipat MASCOS was supported by CSIRO through a sponsorshipagreement. Meat and Livestock Australia has funded some of theinteraction between the collaborators in this project.

References

[1]M. R. Allen et al. Nature , 458:1163–1166, 2009.[2] M. Manning and A. Reisinger. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A, 369:1891–1905, 2011.

[3] H. D. Matthews and K. Caldeira. Geophys. Res. Lett., 35:L04705, 2008.

[4]J. Reilly et al. Nature , 401:549–555, 1999.

[5]S. M. Smith et al. Nature Clim. Change , 2:535–538, 2012.

[6] T. M. L. Wigley. Geophys. Res. Lett., 25:2285–2288, 1998.