Metal-organic frameworks as gas delivery agents in medicine · Metal-organic frameworks as gas...
Transcript of Metal-organic frameworks as gas delivery agents in medicine · Metal-organic frameworks as gas...
Metal-organic frameworks as gas delivery agents in
medicine
Russell Morris
University of St Andrews
Synthesis Characterisation
Application
7.07.5
8.08.5
9.09.5
10.010.5
11.0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
d-Spacing
Tim
e/m
inute
s
-98.00
-20.00
20.00
30.00
50.00
60.00
74.00
100.0
247.0Intensity
Synthesis
New MOFs with new properties
Nature Chemistry, (2009)
J. Am. Chem. Soc. (2010)
Nature Chemistry, (2011)
Chiral Induction
J. Am. Chem. Soc. (2007)
Nature Chemistry (2010)
New Quantum Spin Liquids
Nature Chemistry (2011)
Angew. Cheme (2015)
Ionothermal Synthesis
Nature (2004)
J. Am. Chem. Soc (2006)
b
c
ADOR Chemistry
Nature Chemistry (2013)
Nature Chemistry (2015
Nature Chemistry (2016)
Characterisation
2 n m
TEM
NMR ADSORPTION XRD
COMPUTATION
ZeomedixZeolites for medical
applications
MOFgenMOF
Development
Spin Out
Company
SASOLEnergy and
Chemicals
Zeolites
Pigments
Ion exchange
Anti-microbials
Automotive CatalysisMedical Devices
Oil refining
Adsorption
Space exploration
MOFs - Gas tanks and wine racks
Which gases should we store (and why)?
• Hydrogen Energy
• Methane Energy
• Other hydrocarbons Energy
• SO2
Environmental
• CO2
Environmental
• Ethylene Agriculture/Food
• Nitric Oxide Biology/medicine
• Hydrogen Sulfide Biology/medicine
• Carbon Monoxide Biology/medicine
Nitric oxide – Friend or Foe?
A toxic gas but vital for
Cardiovascular System
Central Nervous system
Skin repair and wound healing
The 1998 Nobel Prize for
medicine awarded to Furchgott,
Ignarro and Murad for discovery
of NO as a signalling molecule in
the cardiovascular system
Cleaner Cars and Greener Gases
+
CO
HC
NOx
H2O
N2
CO2
NO in the body
Vasodilation
Thrombosis
Smooth muscle
proliferation
HypotensionHeart attack
StrokesHypertension
eNOS
nNOS
iNOSNeuronal signallingAnti-microbial
Angiogenesis
Wound collagen
deposition
InfectionDelayed
wound healing
Impaired nervous
system function
Why do we need NO delivery materials?
• Simple, cheap and effective means of
releasing NO locally
– Reduction of systemic effects
Zeolites and MOFs
• Can we use Zeolites or MOFs to store and deliver NO?
– Issues• Toxicology
• Chemical stability (particularly in contact with physiological solutions)
– Opportunities• High gas storage capacities
• Tailorable structures with unusual properties
• Biocompatibility?
– Which structures• Zeolites with high numbers of extraframework cations
• MOFs with accessible metal sites
Crystal Structure of Co-LTA NO complex
• XRD
– K. Seff, Inorg Chem
1979
• Infra Red
– Lunsford, Inorg Chem,
1978
• Theoretical
– Henao, J. Mol. Cat. A,
2004
O N
Co
Co
O
N
Si
Can we use zeolites to deliver NO?
• From catalytic studies we know that NO makes a
complex with the metal ions
• Need a simple way of releasing NO from the
complex?
CoO
O
O CoO
O
O
N
O
NO
CoO
O
O
N
O
CoO
O
O
H2O
OH2
OH2 + NO
H2O
MOFs – “Crystalline Sponges”
+
organic linker metal ion or
cluster
extended framework structures
• flexible chemical composition
• many possible structures
• very high porosity
M-CPO-27: Exceptional performance over the
whole adsorption-storage-release cycle
McKinlay et al, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008
M-CPO-27
Dietzel and co-workers Norway
Biology: Anti-thrombosis Materials
• Platelet aggregation
– Both zeolites and MOFs inhibit
platelet aggregation
• Platelet Adhesion
1-min
Control
Co-LTA(A)
Co-LTA(A)-NO+Hb
Co-LTA(A)-NO
U46619
0
20
40
60
80
100%
A
gg
reg
ati
on
HKUST-1
NO-Z/PTFE
P
10 µm
NO-Z/PTFE
P
10 µm
Z/PTFE
PA
10 µm
Z/PTFE
PA
10 µm
Paul Wheatley
Dermatology Studies
ZeoliteZeolite
+ NO
Acidified
Nitrite
Acid
No inflammation! Unlike competitor acidified nitrite
Zeolite Zeolite
- NO
Acidified
Nitrite
Acid
NO dilates
blood vessels
Contracted
vesselRelaxed
vessel
Ni-MOF
20%
5 min
remove
0
25
50
75
100
Rela
xa
tion
(%)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Time (mins)
Ni-MOF
20%
5 min
remove
0
25
50
75
100
Rela
xa
tion
(%)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Time (mins)
Ni-MOF
20%
5 min
remove
Ni-MOF
20%
5 min
remove
0
25
50
75
100
Rela
xa
tion
(%)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Time (mins)
Anti-Bacterial NO zeolites
(a) E. coli, (b) A. baumannii, (c) S.
epidermidis, (d) MRSA
Neidrauer et al Journal of Medical
Microbiology (2014), 63, 203–209
Wound Healing study
Rate of wound closure
~30% faster
Neidrauer et al Journal of Medical
Microbiology (2014), 63, 203–209
Zeomedix
Multifunctional antibacterial properties
• The anti-bacterial nature of MOFs comes from 3 different
areas.
• Bacteriostatic or bactericidal metal ions
• Anti bacterial gases (e.g. NO)
• Anti Bacterial organic molecules (e.g. antibiotics)
• A combination of all three can be used from the same
MOF!
Multifunctionality of Antimicrobial MOFs
Store / Release
• antimicrobial metals from framework
• antibacterial gases (e.g. nitric oxide) from pores
• antimicrobial molecules from pores or framework
(e.g. antibiotics, biocides, therapeutics)
23
Proven Antimicrobial Efficacy
0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000Ag-btc 80:20
Ag-btc 50:50
Growth Control
8 g/ml Amphotericin B
Negative Control
Teflon Control
Ag-btc 25:75
Ag-btc 10:90
Ag-btc 5:95
Incubation Time (h)
Flu
ore
scen
ce (
F530/5
90)
Meta
bo
lic G
row
th
growth control
blank
amphotericin B
MOF A. niger black mould
contaminant of food
growth control
MOF
oxacillin
vancomycinMRSA (Gram +ve)
top 5 of HAIs
skin infection pneumonia,
sepsis
Meta
bo
lic G
row
th
Multifunctional antibacterial Activity
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
80000
90000
100000
S. aureus DSMZ11729
MOF1
MOF2
Teflon
Vancomycin
Growth control
Uninoculated control
MOF1-NO
MOF2-NO
Incubation Time (h)
Flu
ore
scen
ce (
A530/5
90)
MOFs are antibacterial. MOF + NO shows outstanding
antibacterial activity
Anti-biofilm studies using MOFs
• Pseudomonas Aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus
• MOFs (blue), NO-loaded MOFs (green) compared with 100 x dose of preferred
antibiotic (ciprofloxacin and vancomycin, brown)
• Red line is the biofilm control.
Multirate delivery of multiple therapeutic agents
Why is the rate of delivery important?
Multirate delivery of therapeutic agents
0 24 48 72 96 120 144 168 192 2160
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Am
ou
nt
rele
ase
d f
rom
HK
US
T-1
(%
)
Time (hours)
Amount of Cu released (%)
Amount of Metro released (%)
Amount of NO released (%)
• Fast delivery of NO leads to ‘sterilisation’ of media
• Slow delivery of other agents (e.g. metals) prevents recolonisation over
much longer timescale
• Relies on fundamental instability of the MOF
Toxicity
• Cytotoxicity against dermal fibroblasts and
red blood cells.
Scaling upSimple synthesis
• developed and demonstrated scalable, low
temperature manufacturing process
1L lab scale
20L development
scale
100L pilot scale
Formulating products
solvent cast polyurethane film
silicone extruded
tubing coated non woven polyester
• demonstrated compatibility with wide range of
polymers using various techniques
Commercial Partnering
formulation
scale up
partnering
funding
unmet need
solution
performance
• Impact Factor of 4.2*
• 48 issues a year
• Fast publication times
www.rsc.org/dalton
@DaltonTrans
The international journal for inorganic, organometallic and bioinorganic chemistry
The only major weekly journal
for inorganic chemistry
*2013 Journal Citation Reports®
Thanks
Should the data behind this research be open
for everyone?
• Arguments for
– Data (especially in certain fields) belongs to
the human race
– Public money was used to develop the
research, therefore making the data available
is for the common good
– Sponsors of the research do not get full value
for their funding
– Better access to data means better science
Should the data behind this research be open
for everyone?
• Arguments against
– Privacy concerns: this may be data about me!
– Collecting, managing and disseminating data are
typically labour- and/or cost-intensive processes:
This should be fairly protected/renumerated.
– if anyone has access to the data, none may have
an incentive to invest in the processing required
to make data useful
– Sponsors do not get full value unless their data is
used appropriately.
MOF Synthesis Targets
•Bigger is better
–Super porous materials for high capacity gas storage
•Flexibility is key
–Soft porous crystals give unusual properties
Designing New Hemilabile MOFs
Organic LinkerMetal
Strong Bond
5-sulfoisophthalate
Weak Bond
• Metal – Organic framework with structural flexibility
• Cu-tetramers linked into layers by the sulfoisophthalate linker groups
• Layers connected into 3-dimensional structure by coordination of sulfonate group to a Cu-cluster in another layer
• Two of the three sulfonate oxygens are used in framework bonding
• Three water molecules in unit cell – one coordinated to metal centre
Cu-SIP-3
Xiao et. al. Nature Chemistry, 2009, 1, 298
b
c
Dehydration driven phase transformation
-H2O
+H2O
VT Single crystal studies
Increasing temperature
?
Good Bragg diffraction
Low temperature structure
Bragg diffraction returns
High temperature structure
No Bragg diffraction between 370 K and 405K
Structure unable to be solved by single crystal diffraction
• Function, G(r), with peaks at distances corresponding to atom-atom distances
Pair Distribution Function (PDF) Analysis
C – C bonds in sulfoisophthalate
Cu – O bonds
Cu – Cu distances
Cu – C, some C – C distances
Results - PDFPartial PDFs - give contributions to the total PDF from one set of atoms e.g. Cu – O bonds – allows assignment of some of the peaks to specific distancesDifferential PDFs - show the changes in structure e.g. subtract the low T structure
Cu-S
Cu-Cu
Cu-S distances change before the Cu-Cu distances
PDF derived mechanism
NO loading
PNO = 230 mbar PNO = 338 mbar
0 200 400 600 800 1000
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
N2
CO2
H2
NO ads
NO des
NO
ad
so
rbe
d/m
mo
lg-1
Pressure/mbar
Myography : Relaxation to H2S-loaded MOFs or NaHS
Relaxation response of PCA to an
H2S-loaded MOF of Mg(dhtp) 10%
Teflon
Porcine coronary arteries ± EC:
1)Incubated for 30 min with or without channel
inhibitors
2) H2S-loaded MOF introduced for 30 min, or
cumulative ½ log concentrations of NaHS for 2
min per concentration, or time required to reach
plateau
0
50
100
150
MOF-H2S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Time (min)
Fo
rce o
f co
ntr
acti
on
to U
46619 (
mN
)
Comparison of relaxation responses to
NaHS and H2S gas
Control XE-991 Control XE-9910
20
40
60
80
100
+endothelium
-endothelium
NaHS 300 M NaHS 1 mM
% R
ela
xati
on
NaH
S
Hyp
oxia
Hyp
oxia+
NaH
S
HC-0
3003
1+NaH
S
HC-0
3003
1+hyp
oxia
HC-0
3003
1+hyp
oxia+
NaH
S
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
+endothelium
-endothelium
*
*
% R
ela
xati
on
H2S
Hypoxi
a
Hypoxi
a+H2
S
HC-0
3003
1+H2S
HC-0
3003
1+hyp
oxia
HC-0
3003
1+hyp
oxia+
H2S
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
+endothelium
-endothelium
NS
* NS
NS
#
*
*
*
*
#
NS
% R
ela
xati
on
Control XE-991 Control XE-9910
20
40
60
80
100
+endothelium
-endothelium
50% Teflon MOF 10% Teflon MOF
% R
ela
xati
on
H2S MOF ‘NaHS’
100s of papers using
NaHS to deliver H2S
But MOF-H2S is
more potent and has
a different
mechanism
MOFs
• Biological applications of MOFs
– Some instability (wrt MOFs) is actually an
advantage
• Functionality
• Biodegradeability
– Controlling the rate of degrading is key
• Hemilabile MOFs
– Engineering weakness into a MOF can lead to
unusual properties that can be exploited
• e.g. Ultraselective NO adsorption
Acknowledgments Phoebe Allan, Catherine Renouf, Alistair McKinlay, Damiano Cattaneo,
Daniel Firth, Sam Morris, Matthew MacPherson, Yuyang Tian, Mazlina
Musa, Jurgen Kahr, Giulia Bignami, Katrazyna Mocniak, Pavla Chlubna-
Eliasova, Katharina Peikert, Sara Rojas,
Paul Wheatley, Morven Duncan, Stewart Warrender, Farida Aidoudi,
Laura McCormick, Marta Navarro-Rojas, Valerie Seymour, Fengjiao Yu,
Daniel Dawson, Ana Belen Pinar, Lucy Clark, He Xiang, Maksym
Opanasenko
Katie Ridley, Sarah Morgan, Emily Pearson, Lily Hayes,
Stephen Moggach, Ian Megson, Richard Weller, Mark Thomas, Barbara
Gil, Tina Dueren, Jiri Cejka, Petr Nachtigall, Wiesiek Roth, Sharon
Ashbrook, Wuzong Zhou, Heather Greer, Joe Hriljac, Karena Chapman,
Paul Attfield, Andrew Harrison, Anthony Cheetham, Simon Teat, Michael
Froba, Mark de Vries
Thanks
• Impact Factor of 4.2*
• 48 issues a year
• Fast publication times
www.rsc.org/dalton
@DaltonTrans
The international journal for inorganic, organometallic and bioinorganic chemistry
The only major weekly journal
for inorganic chemistry
*2013 Journal Citation Reports®
STAM-1 Switchable adsorption
Room Temp
393 K
Room Temp
393 K
H2O
MOFs
• First example of pressure-induced ligand
exchange
– STAM-1 versus HKUST-1
• Ultrasound transformation of STAM-1 into
STAM-2
– Significant for increasing throughput in
scaled-up synthesis
Where are the weaknesses here?
PSM of open metal sites
Pressure Induced PSM of STAM-1
STAM-1 v HKUST-1
Ultrasound synthesis of STAM-2 from STAM-1
10mm
1mm
What is STAM-2?
The structure?