Metakaolin as an alternative Ordinary Portland cement...
Transcript of Metakaolin as an alternative Ordinary Portland cement...
Metakaolin as an alternative Ordinary Portland
cement extender
Zonke Dumani & Joe Mapiravana
CSIR Built Environment
OUT-OF-THE-BOX Human Settlements Conference 24-25 October 2018
2
Background
Ordinary Portland cement
❑ Production of Ordinary Portland cement (OPC) is an energy intensive process
❑ Releases large amount of greenhouse gas emissions, mainly CO2 into the
atmosphere
Source: Zyga, 2012
3
Background
60%
11%
7%
1%
7% 6%5%
3% 0%Power (coal)
Power (gas)
Power (oil)
Power (other)
Cement
Refining
Iron and steel
Petrochemicals
Other
Percent of global greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs)
adapted from: http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/special-reports/srccs/srccs_wholereport.pdf.
❑ Globally, cement sector accounts for 5-7% of total CO2 emissions
❑ Interest has shifted towards cement blends whereby OPC is partially replaced by
cement extenders
4
Cement extenders
Fly ash SlagSilica fume
❑ Suitable cement extenders reduce energy consumption of cement production
and CO2 emissions
❑ However, use of these materials is constrained by geographical availability
❑ There is need to find alternative cement extenders from local sources that are
abundantly available
5
Metakaolin
Kaolinitic claysMetakaolin
❑ Use of metakaolin (MK) as an alternative cement extender has received interest
❑ Kaolinitic clays used to produce MK are ubiquitously and abundantly available
Al2O3.2SiO2.2H2O (Kaolinite) → Al2O3.2SiO2 (Metakaolinite) + 2H2O
6
Metakaolin advantages
❑ Lower carbon footprint (CO2 emissions)
❑ Improved strength
❑ Higher durability
Use of MK has failed to achieve industry-wide use globally due to its relatively high
market price
7
Method of calcination
Flash calciner Multiple-hearth furnace Rotary kiln
❑ These processes are capital intensive and complex thereby increasing the price of
metakaolin
8
Vertical shaft kiln process
❑ CSIR has successfully developed a low cost process for the production of MK
using a coal-fired vertical shaft kiln (VSK)
3.2 ton per day pilot VSK 12 ton per day semi-industrial VSK
9
Vertical shaft kiln process
❑ VSK process is simpler in design, operation and has a lower capital cost than
other processes
❑ VSK process development was motivated by need to produce MK economically
❑ Ultimately reducing its market price
3.2 ton per day VSK metakaolin 12 ton per day VSK metakaolin
Metakaolin with different amorphous content successfully produced from kaolinitic
clays using VSKs
10
Research objectives
❑ Primary objective of the study was to compare the carbon footprint (CO2
emissions) of Ordinary Portland cement (OPC) and OPC/MK cement blends
❑ Secondary objective is to evaluate the compressive strength of OPC/MK blends
produced using the 3.2 ton per day VSK and 12.5 ton per day VSK
11
Research methodology
Research design and approach
❑ Life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology used in this study follows the four steps
outlined by ISO 14040:2006 and ISO 14044: 2006:
Source: ISO/SANS 14040:2006
12
Goal and scope definition
Goal
The LCA study compares 100% OPC with metakaolin cement blends, namely:
❑ 90% OPC/ 10% MK blend
❑ 80% OPC/ 20% MK blend
❑ 70% OPC/ 30% MK blend
13
Goal and scope definition
Scope
4.
Use and
maintenance
stage
5.
End-of-life
stage
2.
Building
material
production
stage
3.
On-site
construction
stage
1.
Raw material
acquisition
stage
Cradle-to-gate analysis
Cradle-to-grave analysis
Energy resources Water Land
Solid wasteEmissions to air Emissions to water
❑ Scope of the study limited to a cradle-to-gate analysis
❑ The functional unit is the comparison of 1 kg 100% OPC with 1 kg of the OPC/MK
blends
14
Life cycle inventory
❑ LCA software tool SimaPro 8.1 with Ecoinvent Database version 3 was used to
compile the LCI dataset
Unit process Sub-process Assumptions Source
Ordinary Portland cement
ManufacturingSwiss average data for CEM I (class Z
52.5) used as proxyEcoinvent 3 database
Transporting
Road distance, PPC Jupiter to CSIR
Pretoria = 74 km
Transport = lorry, 16-32t
Charging rate = 50%
Ecoinvent 3 database
Ordinary Portland cement production assumptions
15
Life cycle inventory
Unit process Sub-process Assumptions Source
Metakaolin
Mining and
extraction
European average data for kaolin mining and extraction used as a proxy
dataset
Ecoinvent 3
database
Crushing Swiss average data for crushing of limestone used as proxyEcoinvent 3
database
Transporting
Road distance, Hammanskraal to Pretoria (site) = 62 km
Transport = lorry, > 16-32t
Charging rate = 50%
Ecoinvent 3
database
Calcining
Coal calorific value is 19.57 MJ/kg
Fuel efficiency of the vertical shaft kiln is 23%
Eskom integrated
report 2016
Transporting
Road distance, Pretoria (site) to Johannesburg = 94 km
Transport = lorry, > 16-32t
Charging rate = 50%
Ecoinvent 3
database
Milling Swiss average data for quicklime, milled, loose, at plant, used as proxyEcoinvent 3
database
Transporting
Road distance, Johannesburg to CSIR Pretoria = 79 km
Transport = lorry, > 16-32t
Charging rate = 50%
Ecoinvent 3
database
Metakaolin production assumptions
16
Life cycle impact assessment
❑ Climate change (global warming) was the only impact category considered
❑ ReCiPe midpoint (H) methodology was used to generate the results in CO2
equivalents.
17
Compressive strength
Mineralogical
composition MK1 MK2 MK3 MK4
Amorphous phase 76.5 82.6 90.7 81.0
Quartz 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00
Anatase 0.71 1.04 1.58 1.10
Mullite 6.35 3.65 1.40 3.80
Cristobalite 11.53 6.96 1.49 6.50
Rutile 0.94 0.70 0.84 0.80
Four metakaolins were investigated in this study:
❑ MK1 – produced using 3.2 ton per day VSK with clay:coal = 4:1
❑ MK2 – produced using 3.2 ton per day VSK with clay:coal = 6.75:1
❑ MK3 – produced using 3.2 ton per day VSK with clay:coal = 8.5:1
❑ MK4 – produced using 12.5 ton per day VSK
18
Compressive strength
❑ Ordinary Portland cement 52.5 N was used
❑ Normal OPC paste with no MK was prepared as control
❑ OPC/MK blended pastes prepared had MK contents of 10%, 20% and 30%
❑ Compressive strengths of the pastes were determined at the ages of 2, 7, 14 and
28 day
19
Results and discussion
Life cycle assessment
Material Metakaolin comparison studies kg CO2eq/kg
Metakaolin
This study (VSK process) 0.313
Heath et al. 2014 0.423
Jones el al. 2011 0.330
Moropoulou, 2011 0.401
NLK, 2002 (flash calciner process) 0.370
Ordinary Portland cement - 0.973
VSK efficiency only 23%
20
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
CO
2e
qu
iva
len
ce/k
g
VSK efficiency
Results and discussion
Life cycle assessment
❑ Significant reductions of CO2 emissions can be achieved by increasing VSK fuel
efficiency
21
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Climate change
%
100%OPC
10%MK/90%OPC cement blend
20%MK/80%OPC cement blend
30%MK/70%OPC cement blend
Results and discussion
Life cycle assessment
❑ Partial replacement of OPC with MK can significantly reduce CO2 emissions of
cement
22
Compressive strength
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
2 7 14 28
Str
en
gth
(M
Pa
)
Age (days)
10% replacement level Control
MK1
MK2
MK3
MK4
Results and discussion
❑ After 7 days the strength was influenced in positive manner by the addition of MK
❑ OPC/MK blends had higher compressive strength than the control (OPC) specimen
23
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
2 7 14 28
Str
en
gth
(M
Pa
)
Age (days)
20% MK replacement level Control
MK1
MK2
MK3
MK4
Results and discussion
Compressive strength
❑ Strength significantly increased in comparison to the OPC alone between 7 and
28 days
24
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
2 7 14 28
Str
en
gth
(M
Pa
)
Age (days)
30% MK replacement level Control
MK1
MK2
MK3
MK4
Results and discussion
Compressive strength
❑ MK2 and MK3 with highest amorphous (metakaolinite) contents exhibited the
highest strengths in comparison to OPC and other metakaolins
25
Conclusions and further research
❑ Use of MK to partial replace OPC can significantly reduce CO2 emissions
❑ Partial replacement of OPC with MK can increase compressive strength
❑ Positive influence of metakaolin was more apparent between 7 and 28 days
❑ Development of MK using VSK will contribute to economic growth, job creation and
building sustainable and affordable housing
❑ Next development is to demonstrate the production of MK using a 100 ton per day
industrial VSK kiln for commercialisation
Thank you
27
References
❑ Zyga, L., 2012, Solar thermal process produces cement with no carbon dioxide emissions. Phys.Org. [Online] available from
https://phys.org/news/2012-04-solar-thermal-cement-carbon-dioxide.html
❑ Heath, A., Paine, K., and McManus, M., 2014, Minimising the global warming potential of clay based geopolymers. Journal of
Cleaner Production 78, 75-83
❑ Jones, R., McCarthy, M., Newlands, M., 2011. Fly ash route to low embodied CO2 and implications for concrete construction.
In: World of Coal Ash (WOCA) Conference, Denver, Co, USA
❑ Krajči, L., Mojumdar,S.C., Janotka, I., Puertas, F., Palacios, M. and Kuliffayová , M., 2015, Performance of composites with
metakaolin-blended cements. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry 119, 851-863
❑ IPCC, 2005, IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage. Prepared by Working Group III of the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY,
USA, http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/special-reports/srccs/srccs_wholereport.pdf
❑ Moropoulou, A., Koroneos, C., Karoglou, M., Aggelakopoulou, E., Bakolas, A., Dompros, A., 2011, Life cycle analysis of
mortars and its environmental impact. National Technical University of Athenes, Greece
❑ NLK, 2002, Ecosmart Concrete Project: Metakaolin Pre-feasibility Study. NLK Consultants Inc., Vancouver, Canada.