Metadata workshop, 15 December 2003 Durham University

63
Metadata workshop, 15 December 2003 Durham University

description

Metadata workshop, 15 December 2003 Durham University. Metadata Workshop Timetable. project overview; metadata and geo-spatial datasets; HFE Metadata Application Profile and guidelines; metadata tools; benefits of creating metadata; - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Metadata workshop, 15 December 2003 Durham University

Page 1: Metadata workshop, 15 December 2003 Durham University

Metadata workshop, 15 December 2003Durham University

Page 2: Metadata workshop, 15 December 2003 Durham University

2

Metadata Workshop TimetableMetadata Workshop Timetableproject overview;metadata and geo-spatial datasets;HFE Metadata Application Profile and guidelines;metadata tools;benefits of creating metadata;a Go-Geo! Portal overview and ‘hands on’ evaluation session.

Page 3: Metadata workshop, 15 December 2003 Durham University

3

Aims of the WorkshopAims of the Workshopintroduce geo-spatial metadata concepts and available resources with the intention of establishing a new mindset amongst data developers and users in academia;

encourage metadata creation and publication;

seek your feedback on the design and functionality of the Go-Geo! portal.

Page 4: Metadata workshop, 15 December 2003 Durham University

4

Project OverviewProject OverviewThe driving impetus of this project was the recognition that a data sharing and management solution needed to be developed for the academic community to address the increasing amounts of geo-spatial datasets that academics and students were creating with the use of GI systems and database technologies and conventional means.

Portal technology and metadata were identified as the resources for delivering these capabilities to the academic community, especially with regards to using portal technology as a mechanism to publicise and deliver existing datasets to a range of users.

This led to the development of …

Page 5: Metadata workshop, 15 December 2003 Durham University

5

The Go-Geo! PortalThe Go-Geo! Portal a simple interface designed to run queries to discover geo-spatial datasets. The portal enables searching by the use of various options including free text, date, resource type and geographic location. Geo-spatial datasets refer to data...

Page 6: Metadata workshop, 15 December 2003 Durham University

6

Geo-spatial dataset“data that have some form of spatial or geo-graphic reference that enables them to be located in two- or three-dimensional space”

Statistical Account of Scotland

NUMBER XIII.

PARISH OF CULLEN.

(COUNTY OF BANFF, SYNOD OF ABERDEEN, PRESBYTERY OF FORDYCE.)

By the Rev. Mr. ROBERT GRANT.

Royalty, Extent, Climate, etc.

CULLEN, as appears from old charters, was originallycalled Inverculan, because it stands upon the bank ofthe Burn of Cullen, which, at the N. end of the town, fallsinto the sea: but now it is known by the name of Cullen on-ly. Cullen is a royal burgh, formerly a constabulary, ofwhich the Earl of Findlater was hereditary constable. Theset, as it is called, of the council, consists of 19, in which num-ber are included the Earl of Findlater, hereditary preses, 3bailies, a treasurer, a dean-of-guild, and 13 counsellors. Theparish extends from the sea fouthward, about 2 English milesin length.

Page 7: Metadata workshop, 15 December 2003 Durham University

7

Project HistoryProject History Phase I - Scoping StudyPhase I - Scoping Study

10-month project phase (Aug 2000 - June 2001), JISC funded;undertaken by EDINA and the History Data Service (now UKDA) and involved other key players e.g. JISC, MIMAS, ADS, UKDA;feasibility study

understand requirements and demand for a portal and browserexplore options & investigate technical and organisational issues

activities includedundertaking requirements analysisreviewing metadata standards v. needs of HFEidentifying geo-spatial resources and assessing what metadata existed

Page 8: Metadata workshop, 15 December 2003 Durham University

8

Phase II - Portal DemonstratorPhase II - Portal Demonstratorrunning from July 2002 to June 2003, portal-related activities included logo name and design, hence, the Go-Geo! Portal;portal Help pages;

the development of a demonstrator portal with simple query interfaces allowing for search by subject, date, resource type and geographic location;

and further development to demonstrate cross-searching ofa database local to the portal;an existing, remote, structured geo-spatial data directory service to find geo-spatial data [HDS database];an existing resource catalogue containing geo-related resources [GE:source]; the GIgateway and its directory services.

Page 9: Metadata workshop, 15 December 2003 Durham University

9

Other IEContent Providers

Go-Geo! portal

architectureGeo-data Network(proposed)

NGDF/GIgatewayNetwork

Geo-data Gateway

Metadata or resource servers

Local go-geodatabase

GE:source

Portal

Page 10: Metadata workshop, 15 December 2003 Durham University

10

Phase II Go-Geo ContentPhase II Go-Geo Content GI-related resources, tied together by location, which include;

software, learning resources, courses and training, etc. information about studies and projects, articles, reports, organisations, personal contacts, mailing-listsconferencesguidance and reference documents for understanding and creating geo-spatial metadata

a workshop was held at University of Essex in January 2003 to introduce the Go-Geo! Portal demonstrator to stakeholders as part of an effort to publicise the portal and receive suggestions for its improvement.

Page 11: Metadata workshop, 15 December 2003 Durham University

11

Phase II – Metadata ActivitiesPhase II – Metadata Activitiesamended and finalised the HFE Metadata Application Profile derived in large part from the NGDF Discovery Metadata Guidelines and mandatory ISO 19115 elements;produced a 150 page guideline document for the HFE Profile and to support metadata creation;cross-mapped between the HFE Profile, the ISO 19115 Metadata Standard, the FGDC Standard and the NGDF;created 100 metadata records for portal content and demonstrator purposes. This included converting 25 records from Archaeology Data Service (ADS), the History Data Service (HDS), and the Manchester Information & Associated Services (MIMAS) and 75 created records from EDINA; reviewed and selected potential sources for geo-spatial datasets; hence, contacts for metadata; also distributed questionnaires;developed an MS Access-based tool for creating metadata records.

Page 12: Metadata workshop, 15 December 2003 Durham University

12

Phase III Go-Geo Portal Trial ServicePhase III Go-Geo Portal Trial Serviceand Metadata Initiativeand Metadata Initiative

running from August 2003 to July 2004, Phase III project efforts will entail running portal evaluation sessions at selected metadata workshops and creating an on-site questionnaire. Both efforts are meant to encourage feedback that will lead to improvements in portal functionality and design in preparation for rolling the portal out as full service;

a sister project, the JISC-funded Metadata Initiative, will involve the promotion of geo-spatial metadata through workshops and presentations. These are to be organised and presented at up to 18 universities across the UK. The workshops, such as this one, will provide an introduction to geo-spatial metadata, the HFE Metadata Application Profile, supporting guidelines and metadata tool.

Page 13: Metadata workshop, 15 December 2003 Durham University

13

MetadataMetadata represent an ordered summary of information that describes something, in this case, a geo-spatial dataset. The details include the What, Where, When, Who and Why of the dataset, plus the means to access and use it. A metadata record may answer the following questions about a dataset:

What is the purpose of the dataset? Where did the dataset originate? What attribute information does it contain? What processes or algorithms were employed to create it? What spatial reference system does the dataset use? What is the granularity of the data? When was the dataset created? How do I obtain the dataset?

What geographic area or extent does it cover? Whom do I contact for more information or access to the dataset? What are the access and use restrictions and how much will it cost? Who is responsible for creating the metadata record for the dataset? What time period does the dataset content cover?

Page 14: Metadata workshop, 15 December 2003 Durham University

14

Metadata reveal information that isn’tapparent when looking at geo-spatial dataset files in a directory. Theinformation details of adataset file are revealedin the metadata record.

Page 15: Metadata workshop, 15 December 2003 Durham University

15

A geo-spatial dataset file opened in a GIS software package doesn’t always reveal detailed information without further investigation.

What do these polygons represent? which application?what are the attributes?where is this study area?which projection and co-ordinate system?what is the spatial accuracy? when were the data captured and processed?

These questions can be answered with one metadata record.

Page 16: Metadata workshop, 15 December 2003 Durham University

16

Think also of defining metadatain terms of food product labelling. Labels provide specific information about the ingredients in these tins. Remove the labels and decidewhich tin to open. One tin contains tuna-flavoured cat foodand the other tuna fish. Would you select Tin ‘A’ or ‘B’?

Page 17: Metadata workshop, 15 December 2003 Durham University

17

Metadata StandardsMetadata StandardsMetadata Standards represent precise specifications applied to information documentation operations/procedures to enforce and ensure consistency and interoperability.

Metadata Standards are organized in a hierarchy of compound elements or entities and data elements that define the information content for metadata to document a set of data.

Metadata Standards also assigns structure and conditions to elements and entities. These include Element and Entity Definitions and Identifiers, Obligations, Data Type and Domain. Obligations refer to whether or not a value must be entered for the element; Data Type defines the value format entered, such as character string, date, numeric or a list.

Page 18: Metadata workshop, 15 December 2003 Durham University

18

Metadata Standard InitiativesMetadata Standard InitiativesPerhaps the most well-known metadata initiative is the Dublin Core. The Dublin Core element set defines 15 metadata elements forsimple resource discovery. It also serves as an intermediary sourcefor use between the numerous community-specific formats.

1) Title 2) Creator 3) Subject and Keywords 4) Description 5) Publisher 6) Contributor 7) Date 8) Resource Type 9)Format10) Resource Identifier 11)Source 12) Language 13) Relation14) Coverage 15) Rights Management

Page 19: Metadata workshop, 15 December 2003 Durham University

19

Geo-spatial Metadata Standard InitiativesGeo-spatial Metadata Standard Initiatives Federal Geographic Data Committee’s Content Standard for Digital

Geo-spatial Metadata (CSDGM) contains 334 elements. This standard was produced during a mid 1990s initiative for the intended use of documenting geo-spatial datasets. The National Geo-spatial Data Framework (NGDF)/Gigateway Metadata Guidelines are based on the FGDC standard. The NGDF/Gigateway Guidelines represent an application profile created for the UK geo-spatial community and Gigateway gateway web service.

The International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO) has recently produced an approved version of the ISO 19115 Metadata Standard forGeographic Information. This standard contains 337 elements and will replace the FGDC’s Standard. Currently, the NGDF/Gigateway Guidelines are being reviewed in order to make it compliant with the ISO19115.

Page 20: Metadata workshop, 15 December 2003 Durham University

20

The geo-spatial metadata standards contain too many elements and many organisations turn to the development of application profiles to meet their needs.

a significant reduction in the number of entities and elements each organisation selects from the standards this allows for selecting specific elements that are best suited for specific applications. The NGDF/GIgateway Metadata Guidelines contain 42 entities and elements and were selected to meet the needs of the UK geo-spatial community. additional elements can also be added that aren’t part of a standard, though this reduces cross-searching capabilities across a wider network and other organisations using their own profiles and standards. the careful selection of core element set is always critical to assure success in cross-searches.

Application ProfilesApplication Profiles

Page 21: Metadata workshop, 15 December 2003 Durham University

21

The HFE Metadata Application Profile and The HFE Metadata Application Profile and GuidelinesGuidelines

derived from the NGDF Metadata Guidelines and the ISO 19115 Metadata Standard, the HFE Metadata Application Profile was created to support the needs of the UK academic community;

it contains 71 elements categorised and separated under the eight entity groups;

has 27 mandatory elements of which 12 elements are used for contact details. With the exception of one element (Description), the remaining 15 elements require only short answers or the selection of appropriate term(s) from lists;

Guidelines are embedded in the Go-Geo! Portal and contain 150 pages of support material and examples to assist portal users and metadata creators from numerous academic disciplines.

Page 22: Metadata workshop, 15 December 2003 Durham University

22

The HFE Metadata Application Profile The HFE Metadata Application Profile Eight Groups (Entities)Eight Groups (Entities)

G1 CitationG2 Identification Information (What)G3 Data Capture Period (When)G4 Time Period Covered by Dataset (When)G5 Spatial Extent of Dataset (Where)G6 Custodian (Who)G7 Distributor (Access)G8 Metadata Creator/Record Creator

Page 23: Metadata workshop, 15 December 2003 Durham University

23

……..and subgroup entitiesand subgroup entitiesG2 Identification Information

G1.sg2 Spatial Reference SystemG1.sg3 Level of Spatial Detail

G5 Spatial Extent of DatasetG5.sg1 Spatial Referencing using Geographic

Co-ordinates G5.sg1-a Spatial Referencing using Co-ordinates of

a Bounding Rectangle G5.sg1-b Spatial Referencing using co-ordinates of a

Bounding PolygonG5.sg1 Spatial Referencing using Geographic Identifiers

G7 DistributorG7.sg1 Access and Use Constraints

Page 24: Metadata workshop, 15 December 2003 Durham University

24

G1 Citation1. Title (Mandatory) (1)

The name by which the dataset is known.

2. Alternative Title (Optional)Short name, other name, acronym or alternative language title.

3. Creator (Mandatory) (2)

Organisation or person that developed the dataset and has primary responsibility for the intellectual content of the dataset.

Page 25: Metadata workshop, 15 December 2003 Durham University

25

4. Identifier (Optional)A unique string or number used to identify the dataset.

5. Edition (Mandatory) (3)

The number of the edition of the dataset.

Page 26: Metadata workshop, 15 December 2003 Durham University

26

G2 Identification Information (What)6. Topic (Mandatory) (4)

Main theme(s) of the dataset.

1) Farming 2) Biota 3) Boundaries 4) Climatology/Meteorology/Atmosphere 5) Economy 6) Elevation 7) Environment 8) Geo-scientific Information 9) Health 10) Imagery/Base Maps/Earth Cover 11) Intelligence/Military 12) Inland Waters 13) Location 14) Oceans 15) Planning/Cadastre16) Society 17) Structure 18) Transportation19) Utilities/Communication

Page 27: Metadata workshop, 15 December 2003 Durham University

27

7. Controlled Vocabulary (Mandatory) (5)

Name of the controlled vocabulary used as a source for thecontrolled keywords.

-UNESCO Thesaurus (United Nations Educational, Scientific andCultural Organization)-GEMET (GEneral Multilingual Environmental Thesaurus)-HASSET (Humanities and Social Science Electronic Thesaurus)

8. Controlled Keywords (Mandatory) (6)

Keywords taken from a controlled vocabulary summarising thesubject of the dataset.

9. Other Keywords (Optional)Other words or phrases summarising the subject of the dataset.

Page 28: Metadata workshop, 15 December 2003 Durham University

28

10. Controlled Place Name Vocabulary (Optional)Name of the controlled vocabulary used as a source for the controlled place name keywords.

-Getty Thesaurus of Geographic Names-Ordnance Survey 1:50000 Gazetteer-geoXwalk

11. Controlled Place Name Keywords (Optional)The geographic name of a location(s) covered by a dataset.

Page 29: Metadata workshop, 15 December 2003 Durham University

29

12. Description (Mandatory) (7)

A brief description of the dataset. This should include some explanation as to why the dataset was produced and how it has been used since its creation.

13. Quality (Optional)A general assessment of the quality of a dataset for determining its fitness for use. Quality is stated in terms of accuracy, completeness, and consistency for both the data and the dataset.

14. Language (Mandatory) (8)

The language(s) used within the dataset.

English – Gaelic - Welsh

Page 30: Metadata workshop, 15 December 2003 Durham University

30

15. Further Information (Optional)Source of further information about the dataset.

16. Related Datasets (Optional)Information about other, related datasets of a similar theme or derived from a common source, which may be of interest to theuser.

Page 31: Metadata workshop, 15 December 2003 Durham University

31

G2 Identification Information (What) G2.sg1 Spatial Reference System

17. Co-ordinate System (Conditional Mandatory) (9)

Name or description of the spatial referencing system used withinthe dataset, which is based on co-ordinates e.g. British National Grid, Irish National Grid, latitude and longitude.

18. Geographic Identifiers (Conditional Mandatory) (10)

Name or description of the spatial referencing system used withinthe dataset, which is based on geographic identifiers e.g. postcodes, postal addresses, administrative units, or countries.

Page 32: Metadata workshop, 15 December 2003 Durham University

32

G2 Identification Information (What) G2.sg2 Level of Spatial Detail

19. Source Scale Denominator (Optional)Denominator of the representative fraction on the source map(s) (e.g. on a 1:50000 scale map, the source scale denominator is50000). If no source map used, enter 0. If multiple source map scales were used, enter the Source Scale Denominator of the smallest scale map (largest denominator).

Page 33: Metadata workshop, 15 December 2003 Durham University

33

20. Imagery or Grid Raster Cell or Pixel Size X-Value (Optional)The column width of a raster cell expressed in distance units of measure.

21. Imagery or Grid Raster Cell or Pixel Size Y-Value (Optional)The row height of a raster cell expressed in distance units of measure.

22. Smallest Administrative Unit (Optional)The smallest representative unit associated with disaggregated statistical data.

Page 34: Metadata workshop, 15 December 2003 Durham University

34

G3 Data Capture Period (When)23. Status of the Start Date for Dataset Capture (Optional)Declaration on the status of the starting date for data capture.

Known - Not Known - Not Applicable

24. Start Date of Dataset Capture Process (Optional)Date on which data for dataset were first collected.

20031215

Page 35: Metadata workshop, 15 December 2003 Durham University

35

25. Status of the Completion Date for Dataset Capture (Optional)Declaration on the status of the completion date for data capture.

Known - Not Known - Not Applicable - Ongoing

26. Completion Date of Dataset Capture Process (Optional)Date on which data for dataset were last collected.

20031215

Page 36: Metadata workshop, 15 December 2003 Durham University

36

27. Update Frequency (Optional)The frequency with which revisions and updates are made to the dataset after its initial completion.

Hourly – Daily – Weekly – Fortnightly – Monthly – QuarterlyBiannually – Annually – Biennially – Triennially – QuinquenniallyDecennially – Continuous – Irregular – Never – Not Known - Other

Page 37: Metadata workshop, 15 December 2003 Durham University

37

G3 Time Period Covered by Dataset (When)

28. Start Date for Time Period Covered by Dataset (Optional)The start date of the actual time period the dataset covers.

29. End Date for Time Period Covered by Dataset (Optional)The end date of the actual time period the dataset covers.

Page 38: Metadata workshop, 15 December 2003 Durham University

38

G5 Spatial Extent of Dataset (Where)G5.sg1 Spatial Referencing using Geographic Co-ordinates

30. System of Spatial Referencing by Co-ordinates (Mandatory) (11)

Name of the spatial reference system used for the geographic co-ordinates.

British National Grid – Irish Grid – Latitude and Longitude

Page 39: Metadata workshop, 15 December 2003 Durham University

39

G5.sg1 Spatial Referencing using Geographic Co-ordinates

G5.sg1-a Spatial Referencing using Co-ordinates of a Bounding Rectangle

31. West Bounding Co-ordinate (Mandatory) (12)

Westernmost co-ordinate of a bounding rectangle. (Grid Value/Longitude)

32. East Bounding Co-ordinate (Mandatory) (13)

Easternmost co-ordinate of a bounding rectangle. (Grid Value/Longitude)

33. North Bounding Co-ordinate (Mandatory) (14)

Northernmost co-ordinate of a bounding rectangle. (Grid Value/Latitude)

34. South Bounding Co-ordinate (Mandatory) (15)

Southernmost co-ordinate of a bounding rectangle. (Grid Value/Latitude)

Page 40: Metadata workshop, 15 December 2003 Durham University

40

G5.sg1 Spatial Referencing using Geographic Co-ordinates

G5.sg1-b Spatial Referencing using Co-ordinates of a Bounding Polygon

35. Spatial Referencing using Co-ordinates of the Bounding Polygon (Optional)The set of x and y co-ordinates (first number = easting of a point, second number = northing of a point) that make up the boundingpolygon.

Page 41: Metadata workshop, 15 December 2003 Durham University

41

G5.sg2 Spatial Referencing by GeographicIdentifiers

36. Nations (Optional)Geographic coverage expressed in terms of nations within the British Isles.

England – Northern Ireland – Scotland – Wales – Isle of ManChannel Islands – United Kingdom – Republic of Ireland

Page 42: Metadata workshop, 15 December 2003 Durham University

42

37. Administrative Areas (Optional)Geographic coverage expressed in terms of administrative areas.

38. Postcode Districts (Optional)Geographic coverage expressed in terms of postcode districts.

Page 43: Metadata workshop, 15 December 2003 Durham University

43

G6 Custodian (Who)39. Name of Custodian (Mandatory) (16)

The name of the organisation or person responsible for the maintenance of the dataset.

40. Postal Street Address of Custodian (Mandatory) (17)

41. Postal City of Custodian (Mandatory) (18)

42. Postal County of Custodian (Optional)

43. Postal Code of Custodian (Mandatory) (19)

44. Postal Country of Custodian (Mandatory) (20)

Page 44: Metadata workshop, 15 December 2003 Durham University

44

45. Telephone Number of Custodian (Optional)

46. Facsimile Number of Custodian (Optional)

47. Email Address of Custodian (Optional)

48. Web Address of Custodian (Optional)

Page 45: Metadata workshop, 15 December 2003 Durham University

45

G7 Distributor (Access)49. Name of Distributor (Mandatory) (21)

The name of the organisation or person from whom the dataset maybe obtained.

50. Full Postal Street Address of Distributor (Mandatory) (22)

51. Postal Code of Distributor (Mandatory) (23)

52. Telephone Number of Distributor (Optional)

53. Facsimile Number of Distributor (Optional)

54. Email Address of Distributor (Optional)

55. Web Address of Distributor (Optional)

Page 46: Metadata workshop, 15 December 2003 Durham University

46

56. Presentation Type (Optional)Form in which the dataset is available.

Image – Graphic – Map – Numeric – Text - Other

57. Dataset Format (Optional)Format in which digital data can be provided (e.g. DXF, DLG, MapInfo, IDRISI, ARC/INFO, ERDAS, DBF)

58. Supply Media (Optional)Media format in which the dataset can be supplied.

Paper – Magnetic – Optical – Online - Other

Page 47: Metadata workshop, 15 December 2003 Durham University

47

59. Sample (Optional)A sample of the dataset and its approximate file size (Megabytes). 60. Online Linkage (Optional)The name of the World Wide Web site or other on-line source that contains the dataset.

Page 48: Metadata workshop, 15 December 2003 Durham University

48

G7 Distributor (Access)G7.sg1 Access and Use Constraints

61. Access Constraints (Optional)Restrictions and legal prerequisites for accessing the dataset. These include any access constraints applied to assure the protection of privacy or intellectual property, and any special restrictions or limitations on obtaining the dataset.

Financial – Legal – Other – Not Known - None

Page 49: Metadata workshop, 15 December 2003 Durham University

49

62. Access Details (Optional)Description of the restrictions and legal prerequisites for accessing the dataset.

63. Use Constraints (Optional)Restrictions and legal prerequisites on using the dataset afteraccess is granted. These include any access constraints applied toassure the protection of privacy or intellectual property, and any special restrictions or limitations on obtaining the dataset.

Page 50: Metadata workshop, 15 December 2003 Durham University

50

G8 Metadata Creator/Record Creator64. Name of Metadata Creator (Mandatory) (24)

The name of the organisation or person responsible for the metadata updates.

65. Full Postal Street Address of Metadata Creator (Mandatory) (25)

66. Postal Code of Metadata Creator (Mandatory) (26)

67. Telephone Number of Metadata Creator (Optional)

68. Facsimile Number of Metadata Creator (Optional)

Page 51: Metadata workshop, 15 December 2003 Durham University

51

69. Email Address of Metadata Creator (Optional)

70. Web Address of Metadata Creator (Optional)

71. Metadata Last Updated (Mandatory) (27)

Date on which the metadata (file) were created or last updated.

20031215

Page 52: Metadata workshop, 15 December 2003 Durham University

52

Metadata ToolMetadata Tooltemporary metadata tool designed within MS Access, which can be downloaded at the project web pages and used for creating metadata records;includes all 71 elements of the HFE Metadata Application Profile;metadata records can be saved as database files and sent to the UK Data Archive where they’ll be validated and sent to EDINA for conversion into an XML format and stored on the Go-Geo! Portal’s node. XML is an EXtensible Markup Language, which is a system for marking up documents and data using tags that indicate or define structural elements;the UKDA and EDINA are developing a JAVA-based internet metadata tool that will further simplify the process of metadata creation and validation;finally, some GIS software packages contain metadata editors that can extract some information, but ultimately there are no easy alternatives because most of the information lies here...

Page 53: Metadata workshop, 15 December 2003 Durham University

53

in our brains and we need to move it from here to the computer

Some day we might find solutions to this problem……..………..

Page 54: Metadata workshop, 15 December 2003 Durham University

54

we may encounter beings from other worlds whocould use telepathy to extract dataset informationfrom our heads…..

Page 55: Metadata workshop, 15 December 2003 Durham University

55

or we’ll discover a technological solution thatextracts dataset information from our heads and transfers it to the computer.

Until then, we’ll need to depend on available tools.

Page 56: Metadata workshop, 15 December 2003 Durham University

56

MS Access Metadata Tool DemonstrationMS Access Metadata Tool Demonstration

Page 57: Metadata workshop, 15 December 2003 Durham University

57

The Importance of Metadata CreationThe Importance of Metadata Creation provides support to create a mindset and operational structure for managing and storing dataset information for departmental and intra-departmental use;assures integrity of existing and new datasets using metadata as a tracking mechanism to monitor changes and edits to datasets;maintains an inventory of datasets to reduce redundancy and time required to reassess existing datasets for new and future applications;eliminates or reduces the risk of redundancy in data collection or deletion of existing datasets;reduces effects of staff turnover and minimise its disruptive effects;protects investments of time and cost dedicated to data development;

Page 58: Metadata workshop, 15 December 2003 Durham University

58

assures that other organisations will not replicate data at added cost and time;provides potential users a dataset catalogue to view and select datasets to complement or augment their existing in-house datasets, which can be used together for other applications;allows for more spontaneity amongst users as they browse the Go-Geo! portal and metadata. The discovery of a dataset may instigate the user to develop an idea for a new application;metadata on the portal can be referenced and cited for project proposals;the portal’s node can serve as a repository for organisations to store and manage their metadata and use the portal as an internal resource to access and share datasets. This will save an organisation the time and cost that is associated with establishing and maintaining internal servers to store, manage and update metadata;

Page 59: Metadata workshop, 15 December 2003 Durham University

59

metadata and the portal can provide a quick, short-term solution for data developers to protect their intellectual rights using metadata to announce their data and applications on the portal;some organisations and individuals may wish to advertise and sell their datasets to other interested parties in academia and in the private and public sectors;the portal will be linked to the other portals and the UK gateway, thus allowing for advertisement to a large audience of data users;the metadata and portal will complement and augment other UK academic portals and the UK’s GIgateway gateway site.

Page 60: Metadata workshop, 15 December 2003 Durham University

60

GIgatewayGIgateway Just a few words regarding Gigateway (www.gigateway.org.uk).

It is a geo-data gateway site serving the UK’s geo-spatial community. The Go-Geo! Portal will be a service that complements theGigateway site. The Go-Geo! portal will focus specifically on the needs ofthe academic community. Students moving on to employment in government and public and privatesector organisations will be able to create metadata for GIgateway usingits support system of metadata toolsand guidelines.

Page 61: Metadata workshop, 15 December 2003 Durham University

61

Go-Geo! Portal Trial Servicethe trial of the Go-Geo! portal demonstrator service began on 17th November 2003.an initial evaluation is being held to allow for further feedback at the start of the trial.2nd evaluation will take place towards the end of the trial.The trial Go-Geo! service and further information about the project can be found at: http://www.gogeo.ac.uk.

Page 62: Metadata workshop, 15 December 2003 Durham University

62

Go-Geo! Portal EvaluationThe evaluation session will last for 45 minutes.

try out the portal at http://www.gogeo.ac.uk.complete and return the questionnaire

Page 63: Metadata workshop, 15 December 2003 Durham University

63