Met Labs

download Met Labs

of 12

Transcript of Met Labs

  • 8/8/2019 Met Labs

    1/12

    Engineering MECHANICS

    TERM PAPER ON

    METLABS

    SUBMITTED BY: Adil

    Hussain Lone

    SUBMITTED TO: Preet Kaur

    SECTION: G5001

    ROLL NO: B-74

    REGD NO: 11013757

    Acknowledgement

    It is my profound pleasure to express my sincerest gratitude to my esteemed

  • 8/8/2019 Met Labs

    2/12

    supervisor,Ms Preet Kour,Lecturer ,department of physics Lovely Professional

    University ,Phagwara[ Punjab], for her inspiring guidance for all the times. It is

    both encouraging and informative .i feel it is my pleasure to work under her

    expert guidance and supervision.

    I feel highly obliged to my teacher for her keen interest and valuable

    suggestions .

    I owe my gratitude to my dear parents and would like to say special thanks

    to my brother for their help ,support ,and motivation. Above all, I thank

    Almighty God for all this grace,blessings and strength throughout the journey

    of this term paper.

    ADIL HUSSAIN LONE .

    contents

  • 8/8/2019 Met Labs

    3/12

    (1) Introduction

    (2)History

    (3)overview

    (4)Benefits

    (5)Applications

    (6)Mechanical testing

    (7)Services

    (8)Equipments

    (9) Client Base

    Introduction:

    The Metallurgical Laboratory or "Met Lab" at the University of Chicago was part

  • 8/8/2019 Met Labs

    4/12

    of the World War IIera Manhattan Project, created by the United States to

    develop an atomic bomb. It was where Enrico Fermi created the first self-

    sustaining nuclear chain reaction under the university's football stadium.

    History:

    In July 1939, at the urging of physicists Eugene Wigner and Le Szilrd, Albert

    Einstein sent a letter to President Franklin D. Roosevelt explaining the military

    potential of nuclear fission and calling for the United States to develop atomic

    weapons before Nazi Germany did.

    In response, Roosevelt appointed a committee to direct the research. Early

    funding was meager, but in 1940, scientists at Columbia University and the

    University of California were able to demonstrate the weapons potential of the

    isotope uranium-235 and the newly-discovered element plutonium.

    Immediately after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941,

    Nobel Prize laureate Arthur H. Compton quickly gained support for

    consolidating plutonium research at Chicago and for an ambitious schedule

    that called for producing the first atomic bomb in January 1945, a goal that was

    missed by only six months.

    "Metallurgical Laboratory" was the "cover" name given to Compton's facility. Its

    objectives were to produce chain-reacting "piles" of uranium to convert to

    plutonium, find ways to separate the plutonium from the uranium and to design

    a bomb. Most of the offices were in the university's Eckhart Hall; Szilard laterwrote that "the morale of the scientists could almost be plotted in a graph by

    counting the number of lights burning after dinner in the offices at Eckhart

    Hall."[1]

    In August 1942, a team of scientists under Glenn T. Seaborg isolated the first

    weighable amount of plutonium from uranium irradiated in cyclotrons.

    Meanwhile, work continued under the renowned Italian physicist Enrico Fermi

    to build uranium and graphite piles that could be brought to critical mass in a

    controlled, self-sustaining nuclear reaction.

    A labor strike prevented the construction of the piles at a laboratory in the

    Argonne forest preserve, so Fermi and his associates Martin Whittaker and

    Walter Zinn set about building the piles (really the world's first "nuclear

    reactor," although that term was not used until 1952) in a racquets court under

    the abandoned west stands of the university's Alonzo Stagg Field.[2] The piles

    consisted of uranium pellets as a neutronproducing "core" separated from one

    another by graphite blocks to slow the neutrons. Fermi himself described the

    apparatus as "a crude pile of black bricks and wooden timbers." The controls

  • 8/8/2019 Met Labs

    5/12

    consisted of cadmium-coated rods that absorbed neutrons. Withdrawing the

    rods would increase neutron activity in the pile to lead to a self-sustaining

    chain reaction. Re-inserting the rods would dampen the reaction.

    On December 2, 1942, Chicago Pile 1 (CP-1) was ready for a demonstration.

    Before a group of dignitaries, a young scientist named George Weil worked the

    final control rod while Fermi carefully monitored the neutron activity. The pilewent critical at 3:20 p.m. Fermi shut it down 33 minutes later. In 1943, he

    rebuilt the pile as CP-2 at the Argonne National Laboratory, in Red Gate Woods.

    The stadium was demolished in 1957. The location is commemorated as the

    Site of the First Self-Sustaining Nuclear Reaction, a National Historic Landmark,

    featuring a sculpture by Henry Moore.

    Overview:

    Metlab scrutinized the amount and cost of natural gas and electricity consumed

    during the

    years 1999 and 2000 and found that cost and consumption for both energy

    sources rose during the 2-year period. The increase in the cost of natural gas

    was especially high, providing Metlab with an incentive to find ways to reduce

    its fuel use and costs.

    Metlabs goal in performing the assessment was to identify ways that the

    company might improve productivity and at the same time reduce energy

    consumption, waste, and greenhouse gas emissions such as carbon dioxide

    (CO2) and nitrogen oxides (NOx). The assessment was structured to include a

    comprehensive survey and assessment of energy use, emissions, and

    production practices at the plant, with special emphasis placed on the large

    gas-fired furnaces Metlab uses to perform metal heat-treating operations. The

    plan for performing the assessment included:

    An inventory of all energy-consuming equipment in the plant, including

    furnaces, Black Oxide

    Coating System, plant water system, plant compressor system, and the

    endothermic gas

    generator station

    An examination of the use of plant-wide electricity, natural gas, water,

  • 8/8/2019 Met Labs

    6/12

    compressed air,

    emissions, discharges, and other plant services

    An analysis of selected furnaces performance measurements including

    energy use for

    critical process cycles, emissions, and energy efficiency.

    Metlab managed the assessment with support from Energy Research Company,

    CSGI, Inc.,

    and the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection. Energy

    Research Company

    collected data and analyzed the thermal performance of the two pit furnaces

    (the two major furnaces mentioned below under Assessment

    Implementation). CSGI, Inc. wrote the report and did the bulk of the

    assessment. The Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection

    provided energy-saving related assistance. Each of these entities and the U.S.

    Department of Energys Office of Industrial Technology (OIT) shared

    assessment costs with Metlab. OITs contribution was $100,000, or about 42%

    of the total assessment cost. OIT supports plant-wide energy efficiency

    assessments that will lead to improvements in industrial efficiency, waste and

    emissions reduction, productivity, and global competitiveness in OITs

    Industries of the Future

    BENEFITS:

    Saves an estimated $528,400

    annually in operating and energy

    costs

    Reduces natural gas use by

    50,070 million British thermal units

    (MMBtu) per year

    Reduces electrical use by

    329,400 kWh per year

  • 8/8/2019 Met Labs

    7/12

    APPLICATIONS:

    Metlab uses large amounts of naturalgas and electricity for process heatingand

    process services. The significantresults of Metlabs plant-wideassessment may

    encourage otherindustries with similar equipment andprocess lines to seek

    opportunities tosave energy and cut cost

    MECHANICAL TESTING:

    This mechanical testing facility positions METLAB very well for a wide range of

    tests such as product testing, welder certification, weld procedure qualification

    and re-certification of material.

    American (ASTM) and British/European (BSEN) standard test procedures

    are followed.

    All test equipment is calibrated against a preset calibration programme

    as determined by international standards, using SANAS approved

    facilities.

    Tensile testing is performed on four (4) tensile machines with a capacity

    of 7.5 - 60 ton (75 - 600KN)

    Elevated tensile testing is performed on a 7.5 ton machine, temperatures

    ranging form 100C to 950C

    Bend testing is performed around 4 - 150mm formers

    Impact testing is performed on two (2) impact machines, 294 Joule (ASTM

    E23 calibrated) and 300 Joule (BSEN10045 calibrated), temperatures

    ranging form -196C to +300Cs.

    SERVICES:

    A comprehensive range of destructive and non-destructive metallurgical

    testing is available, which may be conducted in our testing house, or

    where suitable on clients' sites. The METLAB replication, hardness and

    chemical test technicians have an excellent reputation for specialized

    testing on our clients' premises throughout Africa. A dedicated machine

    shop is located on the premises, well equipped to produce machined test

    samples of the highest standards in accordance with BS/ISO/ASME/AWS

  • 8/8/2019 Met Labs

    8/12

    requirements.

    This expertise positions METLAB very well for a wide range of tests /

    services, such as:

    Chemical Laboratory:

    Spectrographic analysis (in-house/on site)

    Wet chemical analysis

    Mechanical Test Laboratory:

    Tensile testing (ambient/elevated to 950C)

    Bend testing

    Load testing

    Impact testing (-196C to 300C)

    Welding procedure qualification

    Welder certification

    Metallographic Laboratory:

    Hardness testing (in-house/on site)

    Corrosion testing (salt spray/inter-granular)

    Replication

  • 8/8/2019 Met Labs

    9/12

    Fracture mechanics assessment

    Delta ferrite testing (microstructure / ferrite scope)

    Consultancy:

    Metallurgical, material engineering consultancy

    Welding engineering consultancy

    Quality Assurance consultancy

    On site services:

    Spectrographic analysis

    Hardness testing

    Replication

    Delta ferrite testing (ferrite scope)

    Machining:

    Specialise in machining of test samples for destructive testing in accordance

    BS/ISO/ASME/AWS requirements.

  • 8/8/2019 Met Labs

    10/12

    EQUIPMENT:

    Calibrated equipment available to conduct the services provided

    are:-

    4 Tensile testing machines with a machine capacity of 7.5 - 60 ton

    (75-600KN)

    2 Impact testing machines, 294 Joule (ASM) 300 Joule (BSM)

    4 hardness testing machines including portable, Brinnell, Rockwell,

    Vickers

    1 Spectrometer for laboratory testing

    1 Mobile Spectrometer for site testing

    1 Wet analysis equipment: I.C.P.

    1 Leco Carbon Sulphur Analyzer

    1 Salt spray cabinet

    1 Ferrite scope for laboratory and site testing

    General laboratory equipment

  • 8/8/2019 Met Labs

    11/12

    CLIENT BASE:

    The services supplied by METLAB since 1982, are currently utilised by

    companies in all sectors of African business including:-

    Transport

    Manufacturing

    Power Generation

    Petrochemical

    Food and Beverage

    Utilities

    Steel Suppliers

    Construction

    Consultants

    Reference Cited :-

    www.britannica.com/metlabs

    www.wikipedia.com/en/metlabs

    www.martain metlabs.com

    www.metlabs.com

    http://www.britannica.com/metlabshttp://www.wikipedia.com/en/metlabshttp://www.martain/http://www.metlabs.com/http://www.britannica.com/metlabshttp://www.wikipedia.com/en/metlabshttp://www.martain/http://www.metlabs.com/
  • 8/8/2019 Met Labs

    12/12