MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM

download MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM

of 67

Transcript of MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM

  • 7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM

    1/67

    MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM

    Prepared for

    Professor Saumyendu Ghosh

    International Project Management

    DNSC 6290

    The George Washington University

    Prepared by

    Ceyda Alaca Santanu Bhattacharya

    Mark Vincent, Ph.D.

    July 3, 2012

    Executive Summary

    This paper builds on the model pioneered by Tuckman (1965) that sets the foundation for manyinvestigations of groups and teams. Tuckmans four phases of team development - forming,storming, norming, and performing are introduced and examined in the additionally complex

  • 7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM

    2/67

    context of international projects. Best practices analyzed from relevant literature are then usedto develop and suggest recommendations and solutions for mentoring a team for aninternational project.

    1. Introduction

    1.1 The Global economy - what has changed?

    It is easy to understand how the global economy has changed by just looking around us. At thesame time we might be wearing shoes from Italy, a dress designed in Turkey, drinking Frenchwine, searching for a German car with a Japanese laptop and talking on the phone that is madein China and put together in the US. One of the reasons driving globalization is that all partiesinvolved gain from the process. Another reason is that nations are increasingly interdependent.No nation can be truly self-sufficient without great expense or sacrifice. The United States, forexample, is one of the most self-sufficient countries in the world, yet it depends on imports forvirtually all of its bauxite, diamonds, coffee, nickel, rubber, bananas, gold, platinum, and more.

    The global economy emerged in the post-World War II period, from 1944 to the mid-1970s, butit has undergone a fundamental transformation with the technological developments sincethen. The pace of technological change and innovation has brought the world closer and closer.The world has become smaller and has affected trade, finance, production andcommunications. Clearly international projects and international project teams will become astandard mechanism.

    1.2 The Value of Coaching and Mentoring Teams for Global Projects

    As globalization brought people together and required them to work together across timezones and cultures, coaching teams became a challenge and a must. Achieving such goalsbecomes even more challenging when team members do not share the same culture, and havedifferent values, or expectations. Low cohesiveness and poor talent management may lead todemotivation, conflicts, frustration, and even power struggles that can seriously undermine theteams effectiveness. One of the values of mentoring a team is the increased team spirit andcohesiveness, by learning the dynamics of team development, and how to access and managethe resources and the individual talents available within their team. Also the communicationamong the team members enhances by learning to listen actively and try to understand everyparties perspectives with respect. It also teaches members not to re -act issues withuncomfortable statements and be open to explore new solutions. It also helps with buildingtrust and increase cooperation. At the end the team performance increases.

  • 7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM

    3/67

    In 1965 Tuckman (1965) pioneered a model for group development that sets the foundation formany investigations. His landmark work defines the four key phases of group development as:

    forming storming norming, and performing

    The remainder of this paper will introduce these phases with a focus on additional challengesencountered by teams in a international project management context such as our project. Fromthese additional challenges a set of recommendations for improvements for mentoringinternational teams will be proposed.

    1.3 Assumptions

    To frame this discussion we assume that our company is based in the U.S. and we are in theInformation Technology (IT) industry. The team members are located in the the U.S.(Washington D.C.) , China (Beijing) , and Luxembourg.

    2.0 Descriptions and International Challenges of the Phases

    2.1 Forming

    Description

    The first phase of team development identified by Tuckman (1965) is forming, and ischaracterized by initial orientation, testing, and exploring relationships with leaders, othergroup members, and preexisting standards.

    International Issues

    Complexities that may arise in an international project setting stem could arise from failure toconduct a clear project launch, lack of a formal project team with a Terms of Reference (TOR),and vague or conflicting chain of command structures.

    2.2 Storming

    Description

  • 7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM

    4/67

    The second phase of team development is storming, which is often the most emotional phaseand can be characterized by conflict, polarization, resistance to group influence and taskrequirements Tuckman (1965). During this phase team members often feel overwhelmed bythe tasks ahead but also stressed or impatient with the lack of early progress. Distrust is often

    typical and is evidenced by lack of team cohesion.

    International Issues

    In an international project team setting, this already difficult phase is even more of a problem.For example, (Daft, Kendrick, and Vershinina, 2008), noted the significant cultural differencesthat could clearly complicate the dynamics of the storming phase. These include aspects of Hofstedes Value Dimensions or the expanded Global Leadership and Organizational BehaviorEffectiveness (GLOBE). Additional international barriers in this phase include differences inhumanistic attitude and ethocentrism.

    Professor Geert Hofstede conducted one of the most comprehensive studies of how values inthe workplace are influenced by culture. (Hofstede, 2012) Table 1 below shows the culturaldifferences among United States, Luxembourg and China. By looking at the scores we clearlysee the U.S. is the most individualistic country and scored relatively low on the power distanceand uncertainty. Almost opposite of the U.S., the Chinese are collectivist, hierarchy is importantand do not like to take risk much. Luxembourgers are somewhat individualistic but not as muchas the U.S. and they are Masculine at work where the best will win, but Feminine in socialaffairs, like caring for others and great sense of community.

    Table 1. Selected Hofstede Dimensions for United States, Luxembourg and China

    Hof sted

    eDimen

    UnitedSt

    ates

    Luxembo

    urg

    China

  • 7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM

    5/67

    sions

    PDI:PowerDistance

    40

    40

    80

    IN

    V:Individ

    ualism

    91

    60

    20

  • 7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM

    6/67

    MAS:

    Masculinity

    /Femininit

    y

    62

    50

    66

    UAI:Uncertainty

    46

    70

    30

  • 7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM

    7/67

    Avoi

    dance

    LTO:Longterm orientation

    29

    Notavailableatthistime

    118

    2.3 Norming

    Description

  • 7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM

    8/67

    In the third phase of Tuckmans (1965) model, a true sense and identity of team cohesionbegins. During the norming phase, team members typically begin to agree upon the teamobjectives and goals. In addition, the previous competitive, territorial, or even hostile behaviorof the storming phase is reduced.

    International Issues

    However, potential advancements of this phase are met with other barriers in internationalprojects. For example, differing linguistic standards can reduce team cohesion andcommunication.

    2.4 Performing

    Description

    In the performing phase of Tuckmans model, the teams sense of identity continues toincrease and the roles, responsibilities, strengths, and weakness of each member is realized.The team ground rules and procedures become fully established and accepted.The focus of thegroup becomes aligned with the project goals and tasks. The roles of the team become flexibleand functional (Tuckman, 1965).

    International Issues

    Even established rules and procedures will have challenges in an international projectmanagement setting. For example, the project setting we have identified spans significant timezone differences from Washington D.C. (Luxembourg, +6 hours; China, +12 hours with DST or+13 hours non DST)

    3.0 Solutions and Recommendations

    From an understanding of the team development phases and the additional complexities posedin an international project management environment, best practices for mentoringinternational teams can be developed. In order to achieve optimal performance andcommunication standards across teams located in different geographic regions it is importantto understand cognitive styles, value systems, and negotiation strategies in different cultures(Morrison and Conaway, 2006). Management must recognize the importance of mutual trust

  • 7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM

    9/67

    building between various contributors in the global team. Several key recommended bestpractices include:

    1) A recommended best practice would be to bring the whole team together at the start, end,and other pivotal points during various projects (if budget permits). Use these periods of working in the same place to not only build shared understanding of the problem domain butalso working relationships within the team. Expect to have people travel a couple of weeksevery other month in order to maintain the teams cohesion and become a performing unitfaster.

    2) This distributed team in the long run must be self-managed. So, when these spatiallydistributed pieces of specialist work cant be completely black -boxed and they must beintegrated. One approach involves building formal channels for coordination. These includeassigning integration roles (such as that of a Global Program Manager, GPM) or by locatingsome employees physically close to others, and opening direct channels of communication tohelp bridge distances(a.k.a. cross boundary spanning).

    3) Incorporating uniform process and quality standards across global teams is critical to thesuccess of distributed teams. This ensures that that people speak the same language (andthat doesnt mean English) to augment the efficacy of the communication channels. There hasto be some overarching standard that guide every phase of activities. At GE, design engineersfrom R&D centers around the world collaborate effectively because, as a senior GE Bangaloremanager puts it, We all speak the language of Six Sigma. (Kumar and Puranam, 2011).

    4) A time zone analysis between proposed locations with this paper (Appendix 1) demonstratesthat participants in global team environment must be open to and have appetite for non-standard working hours for real time communication that may be necessary for the project. So,teams in global environment must also embrace various newer communication mechanismsand new generation of tools for their day to day work such as instant messaging, onlinecollaboration tools in addition to regular channels such as telephone and email.

    With the understanding of four linear stages (forming, storming, norming, and performing) that

    this group will go through in its unitary sequence leading to a high performing unit, mentoringwill provide awareness of the above best practices in various phases required to understand theteam development progression and processes for the team to determine appropriate actions -depending on the theme and the needs of the team have at that stage (Storch and Soholm,2005).

  • 7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM

    10/67

    Brief descriptions for the various stages of development and recommended leadershipguidance and mentoring in those stages are identified in Table 2.

    Table 2. Recommended Mentoring Practices for the International Project Teams

    Phase

    ExpectedP

    haseChara

    cteristics

    Mentoringa

    ndGuidanc

    etotheInt

    ernatio

  • 7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM

    11/67

    nalP

    ro jectTea

    m

    Forming

    Theteam is

    justf ormedatth

    Introductionof participants

  • 7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM

    12/67

    issta

    ge.Thef oll

    owingques

    tionsmustb

    eanswe

    andt

    heclarificati

    onof basict

    erms,ob

    jec

    tives,vis

  • 7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM

    13/67

    red:

    Whoarethe

    participant

    s?

    Whatare

    theygo

    iona

    ndvalues.R

    ecommenda

    tionsaref o

    rthete

  • 7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM

    14/67

    ingt

    odo?

    How s

    halltheydo

    it?

    am (

    oratleast

    thelocatio

    nleads)to

    haveat

  • 7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM

    15/67

    eam

    kick-off and

    aproductiv

    eice-break

    ingses

  • 7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM

    16/67

    sionp

    ref erably

    underagoo

    df acilitato

    r whoh

  • 7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM

    17/67

    aspr

    eviousexp

    erienceof b

    uildingint

    ernatio

  • 7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM

    18/67

    nalt

    eam.

    Goals

    andTarget

    sduringFor

    mingst

  • 7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM

    19/67

    age:

    Organizeat

    eam kick-o

    ff andaprod

    uctiveic

  • 7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM

    20/67

    e-br

    eakingses

    sion,

    Estab

    lishshared

    team g

  • 7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM

    21/67

    oals,

    buildteam

    ob

    jectives

    tatementa

    ndiden

  • 7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM

    22/67

    tif yk

    eyperf orm

    anceindica

    tors(KPI),

    Establi

  • 7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM

    23/67

    shcle

    arescalati

    onpathtoa

    voidbusine

    ssdisru

  • 7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM

    24/67

    ption

    sduringearl

    ystage.

    Storming

    Coordinating,TimeZ

    Conflictresolution,d

  • 7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM

    25/67

  • 7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM

    26/67

    sreg

    ardingest

    ablishingc

    ommonunde

    rstand

    ccom

    monunders

    tandingso

    f roles,rou

    tineset

  • 7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM

    27/67

    ing,

    roles

    andp

    rocedures.

    c.

    GoalsandTa

    rgetsduringStormingstage:

    D

  • 7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM

    28/67

    efine

    rolesandr

    esponsibilit

    ies

    leade

    rshipa

  • 7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM

    29/67

    mbig

    uitiesmust

    bef ullyres

    olvedatth

    isstage

  • 7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM

    30/67

    ,Con

    ductaCoac

    hdrivenMey

    er

    sBriggss

    essiona

  • 7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM

    31/67

    ndun

    derstandp

    ersonalitie

    sof team m

    embers.

  • 7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM

    32/67

    Iden

    tif y/define

    andadoptm

    ethodolog

    y,

    Esta

  • 7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM

    33/67

    blish

    operatingr

    hythm,

    Con

    ductdryru

    n

    sele

  • 7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM

    34/67

    ctan

    oncriticalt

    askandone

    f ullshort-c

    ycleof d

  • 7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM

    35/67

    elive

    rywiththen

    ew team

    Im

    partcross

    -cultur

  • 7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM

    36/67

    altr

    ainingtot

    heteam at

    eachlocati

    on,

    Use

  • 7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM

    37/67

    appr

    opriatemed

    iarichness

    f orcommun

    ication,

  • 7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM

    38/67

    vide

    oconf eren

    cingf ortea

    m meetings

    should

  • 7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM

    39/67

    been

    couraged;

    puttingaf a

    cetoaname

    makesg

  • 7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM

    40/67

    reat

    dif f erence

    .

    Norming

    Theteam establishesacomm

    Encouragedevelopmentof t

  • 7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM

    41/67

    onun

    derstandi

    ng,rolesa

    ndprocedu

    resthr

    hete

    am specific

    commonund

    erstandin

    gs,role

  • 7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM

    42/67

    ough

    self assess

    mentandag

    reements.T

    hecomm

    s,wor

    king,etc.

    GoalsandT

    argetsduri

    ngNorm

  • 7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM

    43/67

    unity

    mustbeest

    ablishedan

    dtheindiv

    idualw

    ings

    tage:

    Runr

    etrospecti

    vesatthee

    ndof fir

  • 7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM

    44/67

    illac

    commodate

    themselve

    s.

    stsh

    ortoperati

    ngcycle,

    Co

    nductteam

    r

    etro

  • 7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM

    45/67

    spec

    tive

    under

    adesignate

    dcoach,

    Mo

    nitorda

  • 7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM

    46/67

    y-to

    -daycross

    -boundary

    hand-off pr

    ocesscl

  • 7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM

    47/67

    osel

    y,

    Makenec

    essarypro

    cessad

    jus

    tments

  • 7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM

    48/67

    toin

    corporate

    f eedbackf

    rom there

    trospe

  • 7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM

    49/67

    ctive

    session,

    Ag

    reeonperf

    ormancest

    andard

  • 7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM

    50/67

    sf or

    thestage,

    Makeneces

    saryperso

    nnelch

  • 7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM

    51/67

    ange

    sbasedonfi

    tmentandn

    ecessity,

    T

    akethe

  • 7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM

    52/67

    first

    largeassig

    nment,

    Esta

    blishKPIda

    shboar

  • 7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM

    53/67

    d,Ba

    selineKPIs,

    Acknowled

    geteams

    su

    ccess-

  • 7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM

    54/67

    small

    orbig.

    Perf orming

    TheTeam canprimarilyconcentra

    Encourageworkperf ormancethr

  • 7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM

    55/67

    teon

    gettingthe

    jobdonein

    steadof pr

    ocedur

    ough

    af ocusone

    xcellence,

    potentials,

    new ta

  • 7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM

    56/67

    es,co

    operationa

    ndorganizi

    ng.Thecoo

    peratio

    rget

    s,etc.

    GoalsandTargetsduringNorming

  • 7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM

    57/67

    nwor

    ksandther

    earelesst

    alkaboutp

    rocess

    stag

    e:

    Deploy

    steady-st

    atecross-

    bounda

  • 7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM

    58/67

    ands

    elf assessm

    ent.

    rysp

    anners,

    Refi

    nerichness

    of mediaf o

    rdayto

  • 7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM

    59/67

    dayt

    eam inter

    action,ena

    bletechno

    logysu

  • 7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM

    60/67

    chas

    instantme

    ssagingat

    thisstagei

    nadditi

  • 7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM

    61/67

    onto

    asynchron

    ouscommun

    icationmeth

    ods,

    Ope

  • 7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM

    62/67

    ratio

    nalizeself -

    managed

    R

    un-Retros

    pect-Ad

  • 7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM

    63/67

    just

    cycles,

    Tea

    m hasexec

    utedfirstl

    argeas

  • 7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM

    64/67

    signm

    ent,

    Team is

    abletoself

    -monitorth

    eTeam

  • 7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM

    65/67

    KPI,

    R

    e-baseline

    steadysta

    teperf orm

    anceth

  • 7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM

    66/67

    resh

    olds.

    4.0 Conclusion

    Motivated, cohesive, self -managed team = High performance

    This is derived from the Principle of synergy which says that the whole is greater than the sumof its parts. A well trained Formula One team - capable of changing tires and filling a gas tank inseconds - achieves more than its members if they were working individually. It is particularlyimportant due to the increasing complexity of running business that requires variety of skillsthat individuals in U.S. do not possess by themselves in abundance. To achieve success in thehighly crowded marketplace, teams need to be well organized, motivated, cohesive, self-managed and most importantly globally distributed.

    Distributed teams in this case is a business necessity; the risk/reward tradeoff is clearlyunderstood by companys management. Companys management is supportive and committedto this move to form a global team. In general, teams working in the physical location take along time to form, storm, norm before beginning to perform; when distributed in this case, thiswill take even longer.

    Distributed teaming is hard and requires more resolve to build and stay on track in the long run.Qualified Global Project Managers will be key enabler in the process and must make sure thatthe team has well trained and has a clear mandate to coach the team along the way.Establishing a baseline as outlined in this paper for how the teams should function duringvarious group development stages will help, however the team should be encouraged to treat it just a as guidance and adapt it to suit their needs.

    5.0 References

  • 7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM

    67/67

    Daft, R, Kendrick, M., and Vershinina, N. 2008. Management, International Edition. CengageLearning EMEA

    Hofstede, G. 2012. National Culture Dimensions . http://geert-hofstede.com/countries.html web site accessed July 2, 2012

    Kumar, Nirmalya, and Puranam, Phanish, 2011. Have You Restructured for Global Success?Harvard Business Review.

    Morrison, K. and Conaway, W., 2006, Kiss, Bow, or Shake Hands. Adams Media Company

    Tuckman, B., 1965. Development sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin 32 (6): 384-99

    Storch, and Sholm, 2005. Practical team based organization. ISBN: 87-7706-460-7

    http://geert-hofstede.com/countries.htmlhttp://geert-hofstede.com/countries.htmlhttp://geert-hofstede.com/countries.htmlhttp://geert-hofstede.com/countries.htmlhttp://geert-hofstede.com/countries.html