Executive coaching and mentoring: Build a Winning Support Team
MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM
-
Upload
srila-bhattacharya -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM
-
7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM
1/67
MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM
Prepared for
Professor Saumyendu Ghosh
International Project Management
DNSC 6290
The George Washington University
Prepared by
Ceyda Alaca Santanu Bhattacharya
Mark Vincent, Ph.D.
July 3, 2012
Executive Summary
This paper builds on the model pioneered by Tuckman (1965) that sets the foundation for manyinvestigations of groups and teams. Tuckmans four phases of team development - forming,storming, norming, and performing are introduced and examined in the additionally complex
-
7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM
2/67
context of international projects. Best practices analyzed from relevant literature are then usedto develop and suggest recommendations and solutions for mentoring a team for aninternational project.
1. Introduction
1.1 The Global economy - what has changed?
It is easy to understand how the global economy has changed by just looking around us. At thesame time we might be wearing shoes from Italy, a dress designed in Turkey, drinking Frenchwine, searching for a German car with a Japanese laptop and talking on the phone that is madein China and put together in the US. One of the reasons driving globalization is that all partiesinvolved gain from the process. Another reason is that nations are increasingly interdependent.No nation can be truly self-sufficient without great expense or sacrifice. The United States, forexample, is one of the most self-sufficient countries in the world, yet it depends on imports forvirtually all of its bauxite, diamonds, coffee, nickel, rubber, bananas, gold, platinum, and more.
The global economy emerged in the post-World War II period, from 1944 to the mid-1970s, butit has undergone a fundamental transformation with the technological developments sincethen. The pace of technological change and innovation has brought the world closer and closer.The world has become smaller and has affected trade, finance, production andcommunications. Clearly international projects and international project teams will become astandard mechanism.
1.2 The Value of Coaching and Mentoring Teams for Global Projects
As globalization brought people together and required them to work together across timezones and cultures, coaching teams became a challenge and a must. Achieving such goalsbecomes even more challenging when team members do not share the same culture, and havedifferent values, or expectations. Low cohesiveness and poor talent management may lead todemotivation, conflicts, frustration, and even power struggles that can seriously undermine theteams effectiveness. One of the values of mentoring a team is the increased team spirit andcohesiveness, by learning the dynamics of team development, and how to access and managethe resources and the individual talents available within their team. Also the communicationamong the team members enhances by learning to listen actively and try to understand everyparties perspectives with respect. It also teaches members not to re -act issues withuncomfortable statements and be open to explore new solutions. It also helps with buildingtrust and increase cooperation. At the end the team performance increases.
-
7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM
3/67
In 1965 Tuckman (1965) pioneered a model for group development that sets the foundation formany investigations. His landmark work defines the four key phases of group development as:
forming storming norming, and performing
The remainder of this paper will introduce these phases with a focus on additional challengesencountered by teams in a international project management context such as our project. Fromthese additional challenges a set of recommendations for improvements for mentoringinternational teams will be proposed.
1.3 Assumptions
To frame this discussion we assume that our company is based in the U.S. and we are in theInformation Technology (IT) industry. The team members are located in the the U.S.(Washington D.C.) , China (Beijing) , and Luxembourg.
2.0 Descriptions and International Challenges of the Phases
2.1 Forming
Description
The first phase of team development identified by Tuckman (1965) is forming, and ischaracterized by initial orientation, testing, and exploring relationships with leaders, othergroup members, and preexisting standards.
International Issues
Complexities that may arise in an international project setting stem could arise from failure toconduct a clear project launch, lack of a formal project team with a Terms of Reference (TOR),and vague or conflicting chain of command structures.
2.2 Storming
Description
-
7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM
4/67
The second phase of team development is storming, which is often the most emotional phaseand can be characterized by conflict, polarization, resistance to group influence and taskrequirements Tuckman (1965). During this phase team members often feel overwhelmed bythe tasks ahead but also stressed or impatient with the lack of early progress. Distrust is often
typical and is evidenced by lack of team cohesion.
International Issues
In an international project team setting, this already difficult phase is even more of a problem.For example, (Daft, Kendrick, and Vershinina, 2008), noted the significant cultural differencesthat could clearly complicate the dynamics of the storming phase. These include aspects of Hofstedes Value Dimensions or the expanded Global Leadership and Organizational BehaviorEffectiveness (GLOBE). Additional international barriers in this phase include differences inhumanistic attitude and ethocentrism.
Professor Geert Hofstede conducted one of the most comprehensive studies of how values inthe workplace are influenced by culture. (Hofstede, 2012) Table 1 below shows the culturaldifferences among United States, Luxembourg and China. By looking at the scores we clearlysee the U.S. is the most individualistic country and scored relatively low on the power distanceand uncertainty. Almost opposite of the U.S., the Chinese are collectivist, hierarchy is importantand do not like to take risk much. Luxembourgers are somewhat individualistic but not as muchas the U.S. and they are Masculine at work where the best will win, but Feminine in socialaffairs, like caring for others and great sense of community.
Table 1. Selected Hofstede Dimensions for United States, Luxembourg and China
Hof sted
eDimen
UnitedSt
ates
Luxembo
urg
China
-
7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM
5/67
sions
PDI:PowerDistance
40
40
80
IN
V:Individ
ualism
91
60
20
-
7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM
6/67
MAS:
Masculinity
/Femininit
y
62
50
66
UAI:Uncertainty
46
70
30
-
7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM
7/67
Avoi
dance
LTO:Longterm orientation
29
Notavailableatthistime
118
2.3 Norming
Description
-
7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM
8/67
In the third phase of Tuckmans (1965) model, a true sense and identity of team cohesionbegins. During the norming phase, team members typically begin to agree upon the teamobjectives and goals. In addition, the previous competitive, territorial, or even hostile behaviorof the storming phase is reduced.
International Issues
However, potential advancements of this phase are met with other barriers in internationalprojects. For example, differing linguistic standards can reduce team cohesion andcommunication.
2.4 Performing
Description
In the performing phase of Tuckmans model, the teams sense of identity continues toincrease and the roles, responsibilities, strengths, and weakness of each member is realized.The team ground rules and procedures become fully established and accepted.The focus of thegroup becomes aligned with the project goals and tasks. The roles of the team become flexibleand functional (Tuckman, 1965).
International Issues
Even established rules and procedures will have challenges in an international projectmanagement setting. For example, the project setting we have identified spans significant timezone differences from Washington D.C. (Luxembourg, +6 hours; China, +12 hours with DST or+13 hours non DST)
3.0 Solutions and Recommendations
From an understanding of the team development phases and the additional complexities posedin an international project management environment, best practices for mentoringinternational teams can be developed. In order to achieve optimal performance andcommunication standards across teams located in different geographic regions it is importantto understand cognitive styles, value systems, and negotiation strategies in different cultures(Morrison and Conaway, 2006). Management must recognize the importance of mutual trust
-
7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM
9/67
building between various contributors in the global team. Several key recommended bestpractices include:
1) A recommended best practice would be to bring the whole team together at the start, end,and other pivotal points during various projects (if budget permits). Use these periods of working in the same place to not only build shared understanding of the problem domain butalso working relationships within the team. Expect to have people travel a couple of weeksevery other month in order to maintain the teams cohesion and become a performing unitfaster.
2) This distributed team in the long run must be self-managed. So, when these spatiallydistributed pieces of specialist work cant be completely black -boxed and they must beintegrated. One approach involves building formal channels for coordination. These includeassigning integration roles (such as that of a Global Program Manager, GPM) or by locatingsome employees physically close to others, and opening direct channels of communication tohelp bridge distances(a.k.a. cross boundary spanning).
3) Incorporating uniform process and quality standards across global teams is critical to thesuccess of distributed teams. This ensures that that people speak the same language (andthat doesnt mean English) to augment the efficacy of the communication channels. There hasto be some overarching standard that guide every phase of activities. At GE, design engineersfrom R&D centers around the world collaborate effectively because, as a senior GE Bangaloremanager puts it, We all speak the language of Six Sigma. (Kumar and Puranam, 2011).
4) A time zone analysis between proposed locations with this paper (Appendix 1) demonstratesthat participants in global team environment must be open to and have appetite for non-standard working hours for real time communication that may be necessary for the project. So,teams in global environment must also embrace various newer communication mechanismsand new generation of tools for their day to day work such as instant messaging, onlinecollaboration tools in addition to regular channels such as telephone and email.
With the understanding of four linear stages (forming, storming, norming, and performing) that
this group will go through in its unitary sequence leading to a high performing unit, mentoringwill provide awareness of the above best practices in various phases required to understand theteam development progression and processes for the team to determine appropriate actions -depending on the theme and the needs of the team have at that stage (Storch and Soholm,2005).
-
7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM
10/67
Brief descriptions for the various stages of development and recommended leadershipguidance and mentoring in those stages are identified in Table 2.
Table 2. Recommended Mentoring Practices for the International Project Teams
Phase
ExpectedP
haseChara
cteristics
Mentoringa
ndGuidanc
etotheInt
ernatio
-
7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM
11/67
nalP
ro jectTea
m
Forming
Theteam is
justf ormedatth
Introductionof participants
-
7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM
12/67
issta
ge.Thef oll
owingques
tionsmustb
eanswe
andt
heclarificati
onof basict
erms,ob
jec
tives,vis
-
7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM
13/67
red:
Whoarethe
participant
s?
Whatare
theygo
iona
ndvalues.R
ecommenda
tionsaref o
rthete
-
7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM
14/67
ingt
odo?
How s
halltheydo
it?
am (
oratleast
thelocatio
nleads)to
haveat
-
7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM
15/67
eam
kick-off and
aproductiv
eice-break
ingses
-
7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM
16/67
sionp
ref erably
underagoo
df acilitato
r whoh
-
7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM
17/67
aspr
eviousexp
erienceof b
uildingint
ernatio
-
7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM
18/67
nalt
eam.
Goals
andTarget
sduringFor
mingst
-
7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM
19/67
age:
Organizeat
eam kick-o
ff andaprod
uctiveic
-
7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM
20/67
e-br
eakingses
sion,
Estab
lishshared
team g
-
7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM
21/67
oals,
buildteam
ob
jectives
tatementa
ndiden
-
7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM
22/67
tif yk
eyperf orm
anceindica
tors(KPI),
Establi
-
7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM
23/67
shcle
arescalati
onpathtoa
voidbusine
ssdisru
-
7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM
24/67
ption
sduringearl
ystage.
Storming
Coordinating,TimeZ
Conflictresolution,d
-
7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM
25/67
-
7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM
26/67
sreg
ardingest
ablishingc
ommonunde
rstand
ccom
monunders
tandingso
f roles,rou
tineset
-
7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM
27/67
ing,
roles
andp
rocedures.
c.
GoalsandTa
rgetsduringStormingstage:
D
-
7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM
28/67
efine
rolesandr
esponsibilit
ies
leade
rshipa
-
7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM
29/67
mbig
uitiesmust
bef ullyres
olvedatth
isstage
-
7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM
30/67
,Con
ductaCoac
hdrivenMey
er
sBriggss
essiona
-
7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM
31/67
ndun
derstandp
ersonalitie
sof team m
embers.
-
7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM
32/67
Iden
tif y/define
andadoptm
ethodolog
y,
Esta
-
7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM
33/67
blish
operatingr
hythm,
Con
ductdryru
n
sele
-
7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM
34/67
ctan
oncriticalt
askandone
f ullshort-c
ycleof d
-
7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM
35/67
elive
rywiththen
ew team
Im
partcross
-cultur
-
7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM
36/67
altr
ainingtot
heteam at
eachlocati
on,
Use
-
7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM
37/67
appr
opriatemed
iarichness
f orcommun
ication,
-
7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM
38/67
vide
oconf eren
cingf ortea
m meetings
should
-
7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM
39/67
been
couraged;
puttingaf a
cetoaname
makesg
-
7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM
40/67
reat
dif f erence
.
Norming
Theteam establishesacomm
Encouragedevelopmentof t
-
7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM
41/67
onun
derstandi
ng,rolesa
ndprocedu
resthr
hete
am specific
commonund
erstandin
gs,role
-
7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM
42/67
ough
self assess
mentandag
reements.T
hecomm
s,wor
king,etc.
GoalsandT
argetsduri
ngNorm
-
7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM
43/67
unity
mustbeest
ablishedan
dtheindiv
idualw
ings
tage:
Runr
etrospecti
vesatthee
ndof fir
-
7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM
44/67
illac
commodate
themselve
s.
stsh
ortoperati
ngcycle,
Co
nductteam
r
etro
-
7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM
45/67
spec
tive
under
adesignate
dcoach,
Mo
nitorda
-
7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM
46/67
y-to
-daycross
-boundary
hand-off pr
ocesscl
-
7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM
47/67
osel
y,
Makenec
essarypro
cessad
jus
tments
-
7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM
48/67
toin
corporate
f eedbackf
rom there
trospe
-
7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM
49/67
ctive
session,
Ag
reeonperf
ormancest
andard
-
7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM
50/67
sf or
thestage,
Makeneces
saryperso
nnelch
-
7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM
51/67
ange
sbasedonfi
tmentandn
ecessity,
T
akethe
-
7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM
52/67
first
largeassig
nment,
Esta
blishKPIda
shboar
-
7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM
53/67
d,Ba
selineKPIs,
Acknowled
geteams
su
ccess-
-
7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM
54/67
small
orbig.
Perf orming
TheTeam canprimarilyconcentra
Encourageworkperf ormancethr
-
7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM
55/67
teon
gettingthe
jobdonein
steadof pr
ocedur
ough
af ocusone
xcellence,
potentials,
new ta
-
7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM
56/67
es,co
operationa
ndorganizi
ng.Thecoo
peratio
rget
s,etc.
GoalsandTargetsduringNorming
-
7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM
57/67
nwor
ksandther
earelesst
alkaboutp
rocess
stag
e:
Deploy
steady-st
atecross-
bounda
-
7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM
58/67
ands
elf assessm
ent.
rysp
anners,
Refi
nerichness
of mediaf o
rdayto
-
7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM
59/67
dayt
eam inter
action,ena
bletechno
logysu
-
7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM
60/67
chas
instantme
ssagingat
thisstagei
nadditi
-
7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM
61/67
onto
asynchron
ouscommun
icationmeth
ods,
Ope
-
7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM
62/67
ratio
nalizeself -
managed
R
un-Retros
pect-Ad
-
7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM
63/67
just
cycles,
Tea
m hasexec
utedfirstl
argeas
-
7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM
64/67
signm
ent,
Team is
abletoself
-monitorth
eTeam
-
7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM
65/67
KPI,
R
e-baseline
steadysta
teperf orm
anceth
-
7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM
66/67
resh
olds.
4.0 Conclusion
Motivated, cohesive, self -managed team = High performance
This is derived from the Principle of synergy which says that the whole is greater than the sumof its parts. A well trained Formula One team - capable of changing tires and filling a gas tank inseconds - achieves more than its members if they were working individually. It is particularlyimportant due to the increasing complexity of running business that requires variety of skillsthat individuals in U.S. do not possess by themselves in abundance. To achieve success in thehighly crowded marketplace, teams need to be well organized, motivated, cohesive, self-managed and most importantly globally distributed.
Distributed teams in this case is a business necessity; the risk/reward tradeoff is clearlyunderstood by companys management. Companys management is supportive and committedto this move to form a global team. In general, teams working in the physical location take along time to form, storm, norm before beginning to perform; when distributed in this case, thiswill take even longer.
Distributed teaming is hard and requires more resolve to build and stay on track in the long run.Qualified Global Project Managers will be key enabler in the process and must make sure thatthe team has well trained and has a clear mandate to coach the team along the way.Establishing a baseline as outlined in this paper for how the teams should function duringvarious group development stages will help, however the team should be encouraged to treat it just a as guidance and adapt it to suit their needs.
5.0 References
-
7/30/2019 MENTORING A GLOBAL TEAM
67/67
Daft, R, Kendrick, M., and Vershinina, N. 2008. Management, International Edition. CengageLearning EMEA
Hofstede, G. 2012. National Culture Dimensions . http://geert-hofstede.com/countries.html web site accessed July 2, 2012
Kumar, Nirmalya, and Puranam, Phanish, 2011. Have You Restructured for Global Success?Harvard Business Review.
Morrison, K. and Conaway, W., 2006, Kiss, Bow, or Shake Hands. Adams Media Company
Tuckman, B., 1965. Development sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin 32 (6): 384-99
Storch, and Sholm, 2005. Practical team based organization. ISBN: 87-7706-460-7
http://geert-hofstede.com/countries.htmlhttp://geert-hofstede.com/countries.htmlhttp://geert-hofstede.com/countries.htmlhttp://geert-hofstede.com/countries.htmlhttp://geert-hofstede.com/countries.html