Mendelian Genetics: Consider this….facweb.northseattle.edu/adclark/BIOL160/Class notes/Bio...
Transcript of Mendelian Genetics: Consider this….facweb.northseattle.edu/adclark/BIOL160/Class notes/Bio...
Mendelian Genetics: Consider this….
8 million possible
chromosome
combinations in each
egg, and each
sperm…
= >70 trillion
possibilities!
How are we able to predict ANYTHING
about inheritance??
With all these possibilities, how can we
predict anything about inheritance?
Gregor Mendel
•1857- this monk
(with extensive
training in physics
and botany) begins
studying genetics
•Current dogma is
“Blended
Inheritance”
Mendel’s
Technique:
Studies peas-
•Typically Self-
Fertilizing
•Multiple distinct
CHARACTERS, with easy
to identify TRAITS
•Several TRUE-
BREEDING varieties
available
1. Alternate versions of different genes
(alleles) account for variations in
inherited characteristics.
2. For each character, an organism inherits
two alleles, one from each parent.
Mendel consistently
observes this pattern
of 3:1 ratios, and
develops a 4 part
HYPOTHESIS:
3. If the two alleles differ, then one, the DOMINANT allele, controls the phenotype; the other, the RECESSEVE allele, has no noticeable effect on the organism’s appearance.
4. The two alleles from each character segregate during gamete production (Mendel’s Law of Segregation)
Mendel consistently
observes this pattern
of 3:1 ratios, and
develops a 4 part
HYPOTHESIS:
For many traits, we can predict the
genotypic frequencies of the offspring of
two individuals using a PUNNETT SQUARE:
The PUNNETT
Square
constructed for
Mendel’s
experiments
predicts a 3:1
ratio.
Does this data
support Mendel’s
hypotheses?
Understanding the predicted results
of a PUNNETT SQUARE, allows for a
TESTCROSS
What’s my
phenotype?
My
genotype?
Understanding
the predicted
results of a
PUNNETT SQUARE, allows
for a
TESTCROSS!
You Try!
Part 1,
Question 2
All the examples considered
so so far are MONOHYBRIDS
Will Mendel’s principles hold for the analysis of
MULTIPLE CHARACTERS (DIHYBRID CROSSES)?
Complication #1: (Mendel was lucky!)
INCOMPLETE DOMINANCE
Heterozygotes have a
unique phenotype,
between that of the
homozygous dominant
or recessive parents.
Note: This is not
blended inheritance!
Complication
#3:
EPISTASIS (genetic
interaciton)
Example:
The “color gene”,
C, allows pigment
to be deposited in
hair. When
lacking, a mouse
is albino,
regardless of its
genotype at the
other locus.
Epistasis and Lab Pups
Black is dominant to Brown, so
Heterozygotes (Bb) are black. The
delivery gene is also dominant, so EE or
Ee individuals both express their
pigments. Only ee individuals are
yellow.
Coat color in labradors is
determined by 2 genes, a
pigment gene (B), and a
pigment delivery gene (E).
If I cross a Brown Lab (bbEe)
with a Black Lab (BbEe),
can I expect any yellow
puppies?
If so, what proportion of the pups
would I expect to be yellow?
Bonus Question:
Epistasis and Lab Pups
Example: Paternity Testing
Scenario : Suppose mother is Type A, baby is
Type B.
Consider these three putative fathers: can any
be the actual father? You Try! (Question 3)
#1 (Type A): Yes or No?
#2 (Type B): Yes or No?
#3 (Type O): Yes or No?
This usually
indicates
POLYGENIC
INHERITANCE,
where two or more
genes create a
single phenotypic
character
Other Issues: Individuals
may display a range of
small differences in traits,
known as CONTINUOUS
VARIATION
Many factors,
both genetic
and
environmental,
influence the
phenotype.
Other Issues: Environmental Effects on
Phenotype
Thomas Hunt Morgan’s
Contributions: Fruit Fly
Genetics•Single mating produces
100+ offspring
•A new generation can
be bred every two weeks
•Only four pairs of
chromosomes- 3 pairs of
autosomes, 1 pair sex
chromosomes (XX and XY)
Unlike Mendel,
Morgan does not
have access to true-
breeding strains.
He breeds flies for a
year, looking for
distinct varieties.
He discovers a male
fly with white eyes,
instead of red.
In Drosophila,
red eyes = Wild type
(the most common
phenotype in a natural
population)
white eyes = a Mutant
Phenotype.
Morgan’s Results:
First Experiment:
Morgan crosses a
red-eyed female with
a white-eyed male.
ALL the offspring
have red eyes.
How would Mendel
explain these results??
What would Mendel do
next??
Next Experiment:
Morgan crosses two
of the red-eyed F1
flies with each other.
What should he see
if Mendel is
correct??
Morgan’s Results:
He DOES find a
3:1 ratio, but
ALL the white-
eyed flies are
male!!
Was Mendel
wrong?? What
happened?!?
Morgan’s Results:
The Transmission of SEX-LINKED Traits
“A” = dominant allele carried on the X
chromosome;
“a” = the recessive allele.
Note that both males and females are
affected by sex-linked disorders!
Practice Question: Sex-Linked Traits
If you see the
number 74, then you
do not have red-green color
blindness. If you see
the number 21, you
are color blind to
some extent. A
totally color-blind
person will not be
able to see any of
the numbers.
You Try!
Question 4
& 5
More on Linked Genes:
We can use our
understanding of
Meiosis to think
about WHY
Mendel’s Results
were so
predictable!
So… What happens if two genes
are on the SAME chromosome?!?
So why isn’t this ratio
what we expect for
a dihybrid cross???