MEMORANDUM - City of Bowie

MEMORANDUM TO: City Council FROM: Alfred D. Lott, ICMA-CM, CPM City Manager SUBJECT: Status Report DATE: November 9, 2017

Status Report

1. Purchase of Road Deicing Salt

The Public Works Department has located a contract for the purchase of road deicing salt with Montgomery County (IFB# 1041647) through two (2) vendors, upon which we will be able to piggyback. The current price for salt with Morton Salt, Inc. (Primary Vendor) is $68.12/ton and we intend to purchase up to 1,460 tons as needed this winter. We will sign a contract and issue a purchase order to Morton Salt, Inc. in the amount of $99,455.20. This is within the amount budgeted for FY18 in the Public Works Streets Operating Supplies Account. The current price for salt with Eastern Salt Co., Inc. (Secondary Vendor) is $77.10/ton. We will sign a contract and issue a purchase order to Eastern Salt Co., Inc. in the amount of $10,000. As provided for in the Montgomery County Contract, the Secondary Vendor would serve only as a backup salt supplier should the Primary Vendor be unable to fulfill a required order. As provided in Section 62 of the City Charter, this will serve as the required seven (7) day notice of intent to purchase.

2. Economic Development Committee (EDC))

The EDC held their regular meeting Wednesday and heard a briefing on the Prince George’s County Competitive Retail Market Strategic Action Plan given by Derick Berlage from MNCPPC and Larry Hentz from the County EDC. One of the ways the Plan is implemented is through a targeted effort to recruit grocery stores, high-quality restaurants, and women’s apparel stores. A copy of the entire Plan can be downloaded from here: https://issuu.com/mncppc/docs/crmsap__web1. The briefing slides are attached.

https://issuu.com/mncppc/docs/crmsap_web1

Status Report 2 November 9, 2017

3. State Consolidated Transportation Program Meeting Last Thursday, Deputy Transportation Secretary Jim Ports briefed elected officials in Prince George’s County on the State’s Draft FY 2018-2023 Consolidated Transportation Program (CTP). A copy of the Prince George’s portion is attached. With the exception of engineering funding for MD 197, all of the Bowie road projects continue on hold. Also attached is a copy of the County Executive/County Council Transportation Priority List which was issued last week. There is really no change from the previous list, except that the County wanted to keep the Greenbelt Beltway interchange as their #1 priority in the event that the FBI headquarters opportunity comes back and because the same site is being promoted by the County for the Amazon headquarters search. That pushes all of the other projects down a notch on the list. MD 197 went from #3 to #4, MD 450 went from #5 to #6 and the US 301/MD 197 interchange went from #9 to #10. The meeting was attended by several County Council Members, including Council Member Todd Turner (who chairs the Transportation, Housing and Environment Committee) and several State Delegates, including Delegate Joe Vallario who spoke in support of construction funding for MD 197.

ADL/lfr Attachments

Derick Berlage, Prince George’s County Planning Department Larry Hentz, Prince George’s County Economic Development Corp.

November 8, 2017

Prince George’s County Competitive

Retail Market Strategic Action Plan

22

AGENDA

Project Goals and Objectives

Retail Market Findings

Key Opportunities

Strategic Action Plan Overview

Marketing Strategy

33

GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

44

STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN ANALYTICAL COMPONENTS

Phase 1 Phase 2ASSESS AND

PRIORITIZEHOW TO

EFFECT CHANGE

Five-Year Strategic Action PlanIdentify GoalsPolicy and Strategy Recommendations

Marketing StrategyTargeted OutreachMarketing and Branding

Presentation of Findings

Retail Market Analysis, Consumer Segmentation, Performance OutlookKickoff and Team CoordinationMarket AnalysisDemand AnalysisMarket Segmentation and PsychographicsRetail Market Performance Outlook

Retail Opportunity AnalysisHigh-End/Luxury Retail Consumer Marketability AnalysisCase Study AnalysisRedevelopment and Reuse Analysis

Prince George’s County Retail Market Strategic Action Plan is the culmination of the Competitive Retail Market Analysis.

55

INTRODUCTION

The Competitive Retail Market Strategic Action Plan presents implementation strategies to help the County

capitalize on opportunities to improve the retail landscape through:

Diversification Development/Redevelopment Contraction Transformation of Targeted Retail/Commercial Centers

into Alternative Uses or Vibrant Mixed Use Centers

KEY RETAIL MARKET FINDINGS

6

77

REGION EXTREMELY AFFLUENTBUT COUNTY HAS STRONG UNDERSERVED MIDDLE

11%3%

22%

33%

9%

27%

21%

8%

20%

21%

25%

19%

22%

31%

27%

32%

32%

33%13%

11%

14%

8%

9%

12%

11%

13%

6%

5%

13%

2%

4%

9%

2%

1%

7%

4%10%

22%

7%1%

7%3%

Washington-Baltimore Region

Prince George'sCounty

Montgomery County Howard County Anne Arundel County Fairfax County

First Second Third Fourth Fifth Sixth Seventh

Prince George’s top 30-40% of consumers likely underserved by available retail in County

Region and nearby counties have 30-40% of consumers in top spending tiers; County only has 11%

88

OVERVIEW OF COUNTY RETAIL INVENTORY

Surveyed 241 Shopping Centers & 10 Main Streets for: Quality of Tenants, Building, Vacancy, Surrounding Land

Uses, and Other Qualitative and Quantitative Factors.

46.5%

36.1%

9.5%

4.1%

1.2%0.4%

2.1%

Shopping Centers by Type

Strip/Convenience

Neighborhood

Community

Power

Lifestyle

Outlet

Regional/Super-Regional

116

31 33

59

20

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

North Market Central Inside495 Market

Central Outside495 Market

SouthwestMarket

SoutheastMarket

Shopping Centers by Trade Area

99

COUNTY RETAIL ISSUES PERTAIN TO QUALITY OF RETAIL MORE SO THAN QUANTITY OF RETAIL

28

25

34

26

2927

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

Prince George's C

ounty

Montgom

ery County

Anne Arundel County

How

ard County

Fairfax County

Baltimore-W

ashington MSA

Retail Square Feet per Person

$309$335 $346

$421

$0

$50

$100

$150

$200

$250

$300

$350

$400

$450

PrinceGeorge'sCounty

MontgomeryCounty

Anne ArundelCounty

Howard County

Retail Sales per Square Foot of Retail

National Average 23

Quantity and sales actually on or close to par with other local jurisdictions, but. . .

ALMOST 50% OF CENTERS NEED SIGNIFICANT REPAIRVERY FEW ARE COMPLETELY VACANT OR RUN DOWN

47

10

69

117

8

0

40

20

60

100

80

120

140

A B C F/Defunct

Num

ber o

f Sho

ppin

g C

ente

rs

Rating of Center Quality

Shopping center distribution by center quality doesn’t align with spending power.

NEW RETAIL CENTERS CANNIBALIZING TENANTS FROM OLDER CENTERS

Power Center Tenant Regional Mall

Strip Center Tenant

Community Center

In-Line Tenant

Anchor Tenant Space

Beltway Plaza Mall

Fitness Center in Anchor

Space

Strip Tenants in Community

Space11

UNMET RETAILDEMAND

73%

5%

12%

9%

Distribution of Demand by Consumer Market 2014

Households Visitors

Non-Resident Employees Outside Capture

$7.2

$8.6

$7.0

$6.5

$7.5

$8.0

$8.5

$9.0

Billio

ns

Gap Between Existing Retail and Supply 2014

Total Retail Sales Generated incl. Estimated Grocery Total Retail Demand

Sales and Demand

Gap = $1.4B

By 2020: Demand will Support 24.1 million square feet

By 2025: Demand will Support 25.6 million square feet

12

LOCATION MARKETABILITY

Criteria

Below Average Conditions $60,000 400 30%

QualificationMedianIncome Density Education %

Most Favorable Conditions $100,000 5,000 60%Favorable, Lower Density $100,000 2,000 60%Average Conditions $75,000 2,000 40%Average, Lower Density $75,000 1,500 30%Average, Lowest Density $75,000 1,000 30%

• Median Income• Household Density• Education Levels

13

SEVEN CASE STUDIES SHOW REUSE AND REDEVELOPMENT POSSIBILITIES

Case Studies

• Iverson Mall

• Dodge Plaza

• Riggs Plaza Shopping Center

• University Place

• University Plaza West

• Great Eastern Plaza

• Andrews Manor

• Upper Marlboro Main Street

• Potomac Village Weaker market potential

Stronger market potential

Prom

isin

gsi

teco

nditi

ons

Cha

lleng

ing

site

cond

ition

s

14

KEY OPPORTUNITIES & STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN

15

1616

STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN OVERVIEW

Key Components 6 key Strategic Actions 26 Sub-actions Retail Redevelopment Tools Incentives Best Practices

Strategic Actions and Sub-actions Phasing Over 5-year Timeframe Key Lead Agency and Partners Cost and Impact Metrics

STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN OVERVIEW

17

LegendLead Agency

Economic Development Corporation (EDC)[Includes Office of the County Executive]

Retail Implementation Director (Retail Director)

Prince George’s County Council (CC)

M-NCPPC Prince George’s County Planning Department (Planning)

Redevelopment Authority (RA)

Department of Public Works and Transportation (DPW&T)

Co-Leads or Partners

Prince George’s County Office of the County Executive (CEX)

Department of Permitting, Inspections and Enforcement (DPIE)

Municipalities

Prince George's County MD Conference & Visitors Bureau (PGCVB)

Prince George’s County Department of Housing and Community Development (DHCD)

STRATEGIC ACTIONS IMMEDIATE YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5

1.1 Create and fill retail director position

1.2 Build strategic retail partnerships

1.3 Develop an interactive economic development toolbox

2.1 Coordinate development policies, planning, and investments

2.2 Focus on Areas with existing strong marketability

2.3 Coordinate land use with retail goals in zoningprocess

2.4 Review high density zoning and locations

2.5 Leverage or request resources from regional agencies

2.6 Evaluate and identify land uses that would RepurposeRetail

3 Designate target areas for high‐quality retail attraction

3.1 Evaluate target area vicinity

3.2 Fund needed transportation improvements

3.3 Identify and fill gaps in organizations

3.4 Provide full support for existing small area plans in target areas

4 Create long lasting, high value places over the long term

4.1 Pursue high‐endtenants.

4.2 Streamline the entitlement process for high priority retail sites

4.3 Develop and implement creative strategies

4.4 Capitalize on emerging growth areas

4.5 Address disparity between household density, incomes

5 Repurpose or redevelop weaker retail centers with otheruses

5.1 Assess low quality centers to identify for retail, repurposing

5.2 Revitalize troubledcenters

5.3 Repurpose distressed or failing retail centers to non‐retail

5.4 Partner with property owners to facility redevelopment

6 Strengthen targeted trade areas with otheruses

6.1 Identify and support needs in markets

6.2 Monitor neighborhoods surrounding stable centers

6.3 Stimulate local business development to building tenant base

6.4 Build on the County’s healthy and stable centers and corridors

1818

KEY OPPORTUNITIES

1919

KEY OPPORTUNITIES

Prince George’s County has Unmet Demand for HigherQuality Retail and a Strong Middle Class Underserved byExisting Retail.

Prioritize Investments to optimize high-end retail attraction.

Overall Surplus Of Retail Space With Low Marketability that isunlikely to attract tenants that residents desire.

Repurpose or Redevelop Weaker Retail Centers with other uses that could better serve the local market.

Surplus of Space Perpetuates Market Conditions that AllowTenants To Overreach in type of centers they occupy.

Increase Spending Power surrounding healthy and stable retail centers.

2020

KEY OPPORTUNITIES

Focus Retail Growth to Meet Underserved Consumer Demand while slowing the pattern of marginalization at older centers.

Target Three to Four Areas for Retail Development based on unique county attributes.

Misalignment of Demographics, Density, and Priority Areas produces challenges in attracting higher quality retailers..

Align Retail Development Planning, Policy, and Investments with Marketability.

No One is “in charge” of Retail Success and Coordination within County.

Empower Retail Business Development Champion to expand knowledge and centralize available resources.

2121

Strategic Actions

1: EMPOWER RETAIL BUSINESSDEVELOPMENT CHAMPION

22

Action COST IMPACTImmediate

1.1 Create and fill retail director position Medium High

Year 1 (and Ongoing)

1.2 Build strategic retail partnerships with key owners, managers, developers, tenants, and brokers Low High

Year 2

1.3 Develop an interactive economic development toolbox web tool Low Low

Align County goals and objectives with retail marketability and create an extensivecentralized knowledge of existing property dynamics that the County can leveragein its investments and decision making.

2: ALIGN RETAIL DEVELOPMENT PLANNING, POLICY AND INVESTMENTS

23

Action COST IMPACTYear 1 (and Ongoing)

2.1 Coordinate development policies, planning, and investments to enhance marketability for TOD and mixed-use Low Medium

2.2 Focus on areas with existing strong marketability Low Medium

2.4 Review high-density zoning and locations Low Medium


2.3 Coordinate land use with retail goals in zoning process Low Medium


2.5 Leverage or request resources from regional agencies Low Medium

2.6 Evaluate and identify land uses that would repurpose retail for non-retail uses Low Medium

3: DESIGNATE TARGET AREAS FORHIGH-QUALITY RETAIL ATTRACTION

24

Action COST IMPACTYear 1

3.1 Evaluate target area vicinity to ensure that general plan supports high-density housing and transportation Low High

Year 2

3.2 Fund needed transportation improvements to achieve a complete network Low High

3.3 Identify and fill gaps in organizations needed to create authentic places Low Medium

3.4 Provide full support for existing small area plans in target areas Low Medium

Serve County’s changing consumer make-up and unmet demand for new, higher-quality retail

4: CREATE LONG LASTING, HIGH VALUE PLACES OVER THE LONG TERM

25

Action COST IMPACTYear 1 (and Ongoing)4.1 Pursue high-end tenants, facilitate new development,

create cohesive retail districts Low Medium

4.5 Address disparity between household density and high household incomes Medium High


4.2 Streamline the entitlement process for high-priority retail sites Low Medium

4.3 Develop and implement creative strategies to attract higher-quality retail Low Medium


4.4 Capitalize on emerging growth areas to encourage main street revitalization Low Medium

5: REPURPOSE OR REDEVELOP WEAKER RETAIL CENTERS

26


5.1 Assess low-quality centers to identify for retail, repurposing, redevelopment Low Medium


5.2 Revitalize troubled centers that can be improved and remain retail Medium Low

5.3 Repurpose distressed or failing retail centers to non-retail or mixed-use Low Medium

5.4 Partner with property owners to facilitate redevelopment Low Medium

Redevelop, repurpose, and strengthen the surrounding markets for existing retail properties

6: CREATE LONG LASTING, HIGH VALUE PLACES

27


6.1 Identify and support needs in markets surrounding healthy centers Low Medium

6.2 Monitor neighborhoods surrounding stable centers Low Low

6.4 Build on the County’s healthy and stable centers and corridors Low High


6.3 Stimulate local business development to building tenant base Low Medium

TOOLBOX OF INCENTIVES AND BEST PRACTICES

Public Incentives Foundations Crowdfunding Co-ops Incentives for High-Priority Businesses Incentives for Rehabilitation of Older

& Historic Buildings

Disincentives for Vacant Property

28

MARKETING STRATEGY HIGHLIGHTS

29

MARKETING STRATEGY OVERVIEW

Purpose Fully Realize the Benefits of the

Retail Market Strategic Action Plan

Leverage Existing County Marketing Efforts

Promote All the Benefits and Opportunities ofDoing Business in Prince George’s County

Tell a Clear, Data-driven Story about the County’s Growth and the Success of Major Retailers that have Opened Here

Target Highly Desirable Retailers in “Attainable Luxury” Category

30

1. EXPAND OUTREACH & MESSAGE TOKEY STAKEHOLDERS

Understand Target Audiences (Owners, Brokers, Developers, Retailers)

Identify Positioning and Competitive Landscape

Articulate County Support and Opportunities

ConnectingPrince

George’s County

Officials to…

BrokersOwners

Retailers Developers

31

2. DEVELOP MARKETING AND PROMOTIONAL MATERIALS AND STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIPS

Produce Marketing Collateral Establish Distribution Plan to

Amplify Message Personalized Contact Mass Communication In-person Industry Events

and Networking Engage In Promotions

and Advertising Explore Joint Ventures

and Partnerships

32

3. EVALUATE MARKETING SUCCESS

Establish Marketing Goals Event Attendance Phone Calls Email Newsletters Social Media, etc.

Review Marketing Results Annually Update Marketing Plan as Necessary

33

PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY

INTERSTATE CONSTRUCTION PROGRAMSTATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION -- Prince George's County -- Line 1

Principal Arterial

Interstate

Primary

135,000 (MD 5) 187,475 (I-95/495)

143,000 (MD 5) 209,750 (I-95/495)

CLASSIFICATION:STATE - FEDERAL -

STATE SYSTEM :

Annual Average Daily Traffic (vehicles per day)CURRENT (2017) -

PROJECTED (2035) -

This project will enhance vehicular and pedestrian connectivity between the Metro station and MD 5. The improved connectivity will help support planned growth in the vicinity of the station, a designated transit-oriented development (TOD) site.

EXPLANATION:

STATE GOALS :

Quality of ServiceXSystem Preservation Community VitalityXSafety & Security Environmental Stewardship

Maryland Transportation Plan (MTP) Goals/Selection Criteria:

Economic ProsperityX

I-95/I-495, Capital Beltway

Phase 2 Access improvements from MD 5 (Branch Avenue) and I-95/I-495 to the Branch Avenue Metro Station including improvements to the Access Road, pedestrian bridge, and the County Roads (Auth Road, Auth Place and Auth Way). Pedestrian/bicycle facilities will be included where appropriate.

I-95/I-495, American Legion Bridge to Woodrow Wilson Bridge (Line 15)MD 5, US 301 at T.B. to north of I-95/I-495 (Line 20)

Open to Service.

None.

The Branch Avenue Metro Station increased traffic volumes on MD 5 and the Capital Beltway in the vicinity of the station during peak periods. The purpose of this project is to enhance access to the Metro station and address congestion.

PURPOSE & NEED SUMMARY STATEMENT:

PROJECT:

DESCRIPTION:

ASSOCIATED IMPROVEMENTS:

STATUS:

SIGNIFICANT CHANGE FROM FY 2017 - 22 CTP:

SMART GROWTH STATUS: Project Not Location Specific

Project Inside PFAX GrandfatheredProject Outside PFA

Exception GrantedPFA Status Yet To Be DeterminedException Will Be Required

Not Subject to PFA Law

FEDERALXPOTENTIAL FUNDING SOURCE:

PHASE

PlanningEngineeringRight-of-wayConstructionTotalFederal-Aid

TOTALESTIMATED

COST($000)

EXPENDTHRU

CURRENTYEAR YEAR

SIXYEARTOTAL

BALANCETO

COMPLETEFOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY

7774,5341,603

41,66248,57638,145

7774,5341,505

41,03347,84938,049

00

9844454296

000

185185

0

000000

000000

000000

000000

00

9862972796

000000

BUDGET

SPECIALX GENERAL OTHER

2017 2018 2019 ....2020.... ....2021.... ....2022.... ....2023....

PROJECT CASH FLOW

PAGE ____________SHA-PG-1STIP REFERENCE #PG2151 08/01/2017


Principal Arterial

Interstate

Primary

176,325

207,650


STATE SYSTEM :


PROJECTED (2035) -

The existing bridges are nearing the end of their useful life and are in need of replacement.EXPLANATION:

STATE GOALS :

Quality of ServiceSystem PreservationX Community VitalitySafety & Security Environmental Stewardship


Economic Prosperity


Replace Bridges 1616205 and 1616206 over Suitland Road.

I-95/I-495, American Legion Bridge to Woodrow Wilson Bridge (Line 15)

Construction underway.

None.

The existing structures are structurally deficient and functionally obsolete.PURPOSE & NEED SUMMARY STATEMENT:

PROJECT:

DESCRIPTION:


STATUS:







PHASE


TOTALESTIMATED

COST($000)

EXPENDTHRU

CURRENTYEAR YEAR

SIXYEARTOTAL

BALANCETO


01,874

033,89735,7711,446

01,874

05,1857,0591,446

000

9,3249,324

0

000

9,3249,324

0

000

10,06410,064

0

000000

000000

000000

000

28,71228,712

0

000000

BUDGET


2017 2018 2019 ....2020.... ....2021.... ....2022.... ....2023....

PROJECT CASH FLOW



Principal Arterial

Interstate

Primary

201,575

226,350


STATE SYSTEM :


PROJECTED (2035) -

The existing bridges are nearing the end of their useful life and are in need of replacement.EXPLANATION:

STATE GOALS :



Economic Prosperity


Replace Bridges 1616005 and 1616006 over Suitland Parkway.

I-95/I-495, American Legion Bridge to Woodrow Wilson Bridge (Line 15).

Engineering underway. Construction to begin during budget fiscal year. Construction delay due to necessary design work.

None.

The existing structures are structurally deficient and functionally obsolete.PURPOSE & NEED SUMMARY STATEMENT:

PROJECT:

DESCRIPTION:


STATUS:







PHASE


TOTALESTIMATED

COST($000)

EXPENDTHRU

CURRENTYEAR YEAR

SIXYEARTOTAL

BALANCETO


01,176

030,00031,17623,400

01,176

00

1,1760

000000

000

8,0008,0006,240

000

8,0008,0006,240

000

8,0008,0006,240

000

6,0006,0004,680

000000

000

30,00030,00023,400

000000

BUDGET


2017 2018 2019 ....2020.... ....2021.... ....2022.... ....2023....

PROJECT CASH FLOW



Intermediate Arterial

Interstate

Primary

108,450 - 127,600

133,850 - 157,450


STATE SYSTEM :


PROJECTED (2035) -

The resurfacing will extend the useful lifespan of the roadway, while enhancing the quality of travel along the corridor.EXPLANATION:

STATE GOALS :



Economic Prosperity

US 50, John Hanson Highway

Construct safety and resurfacing improvements on US 50 from east of Lottsford Vista Road to Anne Arundel County Line (Westbound) (7.2 miles).

MD 3, US 50 to MD 32 (Line 18)US 301, South Corridor Transportation Study (Line 24)US 301, North of Mount Oak Road to US 50 (Line 25)


None.

This project enhances the longevity of the roadway surfaces.PURPOSE & NEED SUMMARY STATEMENT:

PROJECT:

DESCRIPTION:


STATUS:







PHASE


TOTALESTIMATED

COST($000)

EXPENDTHRU

CURRENTYEAR YEAR

SIXYEARTOTAL

BALANCETO


0309

011,09211,401

310

0309

03,5913,900

310

000

7,5017,501

0

000000

000000

000000

000000

000000

000

7,5017,501

0

000000

BUDGET


2017 2018 2019 ....2020.... ....2021.... ....2022.... ....2023....

PROJECT CASH FLOW


PRIMARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAMSTATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION -- Prince George's County -- Line 5

Principal Arterial

Interstate

Primary

222,125

268,350


STATE SYSTEM :


PROJECTED (2035) -

The existing bridge is nearing the end of its useful life and is in need of replacement.EXPLANATION:

STATE GOALS :



Economic Prosperity

I-95, Capital Beltway

Replace Bridge 1615305, 1615306 over MD 214.



None.

The existing structure is structurally deficient and functionally obselete.PURPOSE & NEED SUMMARY STATEMENT:

PROJECT:

DESCRIPTION:


STATUS:







PHASE


TOTALESTIMATED

COST($000)

EXPENDTHRU

CURRENTYEAR YEAR

SIXYEARTOTAL

BALANCETO


01,176

035,68636,86227,835

0699

0196895153

0477

0490967382

000

8,7738,7736,843

000

17,67117,67113,783

000

8,5568,5566,674

000000

000000

0477

035,49035,96727,682

000000

BUDGET


2017 2018 2019 ....2020.... ....2021.... ....2022.... ....2023....

PROJECT CASH FLOW




Freeway/Expressway

Primary

72,725

99,350


STATE SYSTEM :


PROJECTED (2035) -

The new interchange at MD 4 and Suitland Parkway will facilitate enhanced access to an area that is planned for growth and economic development. In addition, the project will improve safety and reduce congestion at the existing at-grade intersection.

EXPLANATION:

STATE GOALS :

Quality of ServiceXSystem PreservationX Community VitalitySafety & Security Environmental StewardshipX



MD 4, Pennsylvania Avenue

Construct a new interchange at MD 4 and Suitland Parkway. Bicycles and pedestrians will be accommodated where appropriate. (BRAC Related)

I-95/I-495, American Legion Bridge to Woodrow Wilson Bridge (Line 15)MD 4, MD 223 to I-95/I-495 (Line 19)


The cost increase of $2.3 million is due to design modifications.

Severe traffic congestion occurs during peak hours and will increase with planned development in the immediate area. This project will relieve existing congestion and accommodate increasing traffic volumes associated with future growth.


PROJECT:

DESCRIPTION:


STATUS:







PHASE


TOTALESTIMATED

COST($000)

EXPENDTHRU

CURRENTYEAR YEAR

SIXYEARTOTAL

BALANCETO


012,40525,65692,949

131,010100,119

012,40513,2459,041

34,69121,406

00

4,58817,42422,01216,585

00

4,47424,13428,60822,680

00

3,34924,18027,52922,523

000

18,17018,17016,925

000000

000000

00

12,41183,90896,31978,713

000000

BUDGET


2017 2018 2019 ....2020.... ....2021.... ....2022.... ....2023....

PROJECT CASH FLOW




Other Principal Arterial

Primary

44,000

59,100


STATE SYSTEM :


PROJECTED (2035) -

The raised curb, sidewalk, and multi-use trail, on-road bicycle accommodations and other traffic calming measures will enhance pedestrian and bicycle safety and connectivity throughout the corridor.

EXPLANATION:

STATE GOALS :

Quality of ServiceSystem PreservationX Community VitalityXSafety & SecurityX Environmental StewardshipX


Economic Prosperity


Construct raised curb along the outside edge of roadway, sidewalk along southbound MD 4, a 10 foot multi-use trail along northbound MD 4, on-road bicycle accommodations and other traffic calming measures from Forestville Road to MD 458 (Silver Hill Road) (2.1 miles).


None.

This project provides traffic calming and enhanced pedestrian and bicycle safety on a roadway segment that has experienced a higher than average pedestrian related crash rate.


PROJECT:

DESCRIPTION:


STATUS:







PHASE


TOTALESTIMATED

COST($000)

EXPENDTHRU

CURRENTYEAR YEAR

SIXYEARTOTAL

BALANCETO


01,831

31624,47626,6231,747

01,831

31624,47626,6231,747

000000

000000

000000

000000

000000

000000

000000

000000

BUDGET


2017 2018 2019 ....2020.... ....2021.... ....2022.... ....2023....

PROJECT CASH FLOW



Principal Arterial

Freeway/Expressway

Primary

65,000

97,700


STATE SYSTEM :


PROJECTED (2035) -

This project reduces congestion at a major bottleneck along the MD 5 and US 301 corridor and removes at-grade conflict points at Brandywine Road and MD 373.EXPLANATION:

STATE GOALS :

Quality of ServiceXSystem Preservation Community VitalityXSafety & SecurityX Environmental Stewardship


Economic Prosperity

MD 5, Branch Avenue

Construct a new interchange at MD 5, MD 373 and Brandywine Road Relocated. This project also includes a park and ride lot. Bicycle and pedestrian accommodations will be included where appropriate.

MD 5, US 301 at T.B. to north of I-95/I-495 (Line 20)US 301, South Corridor Transportation Study (Line 24)US 301, Study to upgrade Intersections at MD 5 and MD 228/MD 5 BU (Line 26)

Construction underway. Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission is contributing $8.6 million towards Construction.

None.

Significant traffic congestion occurs during peak hours and will increase as growth continues to occur in southern Prince George's County and Southern Maryland.


PROJECT:

DESCRIPTION:


STATUS:



Project Inside PFA GrandfatheredXProject Outside PFAX




PHASE


TOTALESTIMATED

COST($000)

EXPENDTHRU

CURRENTYEAR YEAR

SIXYEARTOTAL

BALANCETO


06,8665,849

42,72655,44131,886

06,8664,1459,409

20,42011,118

00

60911,69712,3067,269

00

68612,35613,0427,746

00

4099,2649,6735,753

000000

000000

000000

00

1,70433,31735,02120,768

000000

BUDGET

SPECIALX GENERAL OTHERX

2017 2018 2019 ....2020.... ....2021.... ....2022.... ....2023....

PROJECT CASH FLOW




Freeway/Expressway

Primary

82,700

102,850


STATE SYSTEM :


PROJECTED (2035) -

The new interchange will improve safety and reduce congestion at the existing at-grade intersection. In addition, the project will improve circulation in the area surrounding the National Harbor.

EXPLANATION:

STATE GOALS :

Quality of ServiceXSystem PreservationX Community VitalityXSafety & SecurityX Environmental Stewardship



MD 210, Indian Head Highway

Construct a new interchange at MD 210 and Kerby Hill Road/Livingston Road. Bicycles and pedestrians will be accommodated where appropriate.

MD 210, MD 228 to 95/I-495 (Line 22)


None.

Increased development along this corridor has caused MD 210 to have significant congestion during peak periods.PURPOSE & NEED SUMMARY STATEMENT:

PROJECT:

DESCRIPTION:


STATUS:







PHASE


TOTALESTIMATED

COST($000)

EXPENDTHRU

CURRENTYEAR YEAR

SIXYEARTOTAL

BALANCETO


06,331

12,50797,296

116,13495,833

05,2696,940

32,13044,33930,417

0430

1,74827,43429,61227,288

0632

2,11634,28237,03033,740

00

1,7033,4505,1534,388

000000

000000

000000

01,0625,567

65,16671,79565,416

000000

BUDGET


2017 2018 2019 ....2020.... ....2021.... ....2022.... ....2023....

PROJECT CASH FLOW


SECONDARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAMSTATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION -- Prince George's County -- Line 10

Major Collector

Minor Arterial

Secondary

32,300

38,000


STATE SYSTEM :


PROJECTED (2035) -

Improvements to this intersection in the vicinity of the Joint Base Andrews is supportive of the congressionally authorized BRAC initiative. This improvement will provide congestion relief and safety improvements.

EXPLANATION:

STATE GOALS :

Quality of ServiceSystem PreservationX Community VitalityXSafety & SecurityX Environmental Stewardship



MD 337, Allentown Road

Construct intersection improvements at MD 337 (Allentown Road) at Suitland Road and I-95/I-495 NB off Ramp. Bicycle and pedestrian access will be provided where appropriate. (BRAC Related)



None.

Improving access to the Joint Base Andrews is a vital component to accommodate the increase in employment as a result of BRAC. This project will improve safety, capacity, and operations at the intersection.


PROJECT:

DESCRIPTION:


STATUS:







PHASE


TOTALESTIMATED

COST($000)

EXPENDTHRU

CURRENTYEAR YEAR

SIXYEARTOTAL

BALANCETO


00

5445,5746,1184,876

00

3355,5745,9094,708

00

2090

209168

000000

000000

000000

000000

000000

00

2090

209168

000000

BUDGET


2017 2018 2019 ....2020.... ....2021.... ....2022.... ....2023....

PROJECT CASH FLOW



Major Collector

Minor Arterial

Secondary

9,300

16,900


STATE SYSTEM :


PROJECTED (2035) -

The project replaces a functionally obsolete bridge width a wider bridge that accommodates bicycles. The project also replaces temporary pipes under the bridge that were damaged by storms. The new pipes will adequately handle high water volumes from severe storms.

EXPLANATION:

STATE GOALS :



Economic Prosperity

MD 381, Brandywine Road

Replace Bridge 1630500 over Timothy Branch.

Construction delayed unitl FY 18.

The cost increase of $1.0 million is due to additional utility costs.

The project increases the width of the bridge to provide a safer travel area and improves water flow at the roadway crossing.PURPOSE & NEED SUMMARY STATEMENT:

PROJECT:

DESCRIPTION:


STATUS:






FEDERALPOTENTIAL FUNDING SOURCE:

PHASE


TOTALESTIMATED

COST($000)

EXPENDTHRU

CURRENTYEAR YEAR

SIXYEARTOTAL

BALANCETO


01,176

953,0494,320

0

0769594

8320

0407

91,0381,454

0

009

2,0072,016

0

009090

009090

000000

000000

040736

3,0453,488

0

000000

BUDGET


2017 2018 2019 ....2020.... ....2021.... ....2022.... ....2023....

PROJECT CASH FLOW



Major Collector

Minor Arterial

Secondary

23,800

32,800


STATE SYSTEM :


PROJECTED (2035) -

The landscaped median, sidewalks, and crosswalk improvements will enhance traffic calming and pedestrian safety along the roadway. This project also reduces impervious surface area and adds landscaping that will increase stormwater management capacity.

EXPLANATION:

STATE GOALS :

Quality of ServiceSystem PreservationX Community VitalityXSafety & SecurityX Environmental StewardshipX


Economic Prosperity

MD 500, Queens Chapel Road

Construct landscaped median with sidewalk and crosswalk improvements from MD 208 (Hamilton Street) to MD 410 (East-West Highway/Adelphi Road) (0.2 miles).


None.

This project provides traffic calming and enhances pedestrian safety along the roadway.PURPOSE & NEED SUMMARY STATEMENT:

PROJECT:

DESCRIPTION:


STATUS:







PHASE


TOTALESTIMATED

COST($000)

EXPENDTHRU

CURRENTYEAR YEAR

SIXYEARTOTAL

BALANCETO


02,037

2589,162

11,4571,937

02,037

2587,918

10,2131,937

000

1,1481,148

0

000

96960

000000

000000

000000

000000

000

1,2441,244

0

000000

BUDGET


2017 2018 2019 ....2020.... ....2021.... ....2022.... ....2023....

PROJECT CASH FLOW



Minor Arterial

Minor Arterial

Secondary

21,975

26,550


STATE SYSTEM :


PROJECTED (2035) -

The landscaped median, sidewalks, and crosswalk improvements will enhance traffic calming and pedestrian safety along the roadway. The project also reduces impervious surface area and adds landscaping that will increase stormwater management capacity.

EXPLANATION:

STATE GOALS :

Quality of ServiceSystem PreservationX Community VitalitySafety & SecurityX Environmental Stewardship


Economic Prosperity

MD 500, Queens Chapel Road

Construct landscaped median with sidewalk and crosswalk improvments from MD 208 (Hamilton Street) to the D.C. Line (1.2 miles).

MD 500, MD 410 to MD 208 (Line 12)


None.

This project provides traffic calming and enhances pedestrians safety along the roadway.PURPOSE & NEED SUMMARY STATEMENT:

PROJECT:

DESCRIPTION:


STATUS:







PHASE


TOTALESTIMATED

COST($000)

EXPENDTHRU

CURRENTYEAR YEAR

SIXYEARTOTAL

BALANCETO


02,8971,666

19,17723,74014,957

02,897

83222

3,202173

00

4872,5493,0361,988

00

4878,3958,8826,548

00

4875,9866,4734,669

00

1222,0252,1471,579

000000

000000

00

1,58318,95520,53814,784

000000

BUDGET


2017 2018 2019 ....2020.... ....2021.... ....2022.... ....2023....

PROJECT CASH FLOW





Secondary

48,875

66,825


STATE SYSTEM :


PROJECTED (2035) -

This project will improve traffic operations while enhancing bicycle and pedestrian mobility and safety.EXPLANATION:

STATE GOALS :

Quality of ServiceSystem Preservation Community VitalitySafety & SecurityX Environmental Stewardship


Economic Prosperity

US 1, Baltimore Avenue

Reconstruct US 1 from College Avenue to MD 193 (Segment 1). Bicycle and pedestrian facilities will be included where appropriate (1.5 miles).

US 1, MD 193 to I-95, Segments 2 and 3 (Line 33)

Engineering and Right-of-Way underway. Construction to begin during the budget fiscal year.

The cost decrease of $4.9 million is due to reduced Right-of-Way needs.

Major traffic congestion is experienced along this segment of US 1. This project would improve traffic operations, pedestrian circulation, and safety. This project would also accommodate planned revitalization within College Park.


PROJECT:

DESCRIPTION:


STATUS:







PHASE


TOTALESTIMATED

COST($000)

EXPENDTHRU

CURRENTYEAR YEAR

SIXYEARTOTAL

BALANCETO


08,5646,351

30,03544,95031,827

05,3281,247

06,5755,163

02,7743,500

06,2742,774

0462

1,6043,3455,4113,071

000

8,1158,1156,330

000

9,1569,1567,142

000

9,4199,4197,347

000000

03,2365,104

30,03538,37526,664

000000

BUDGET


2017 2018 2019 ....2020.... ....2021.... ....2022.... ....2023....

PROJECT CASH FLOW


INTERSTATE DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION PROGRAMSTATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION -- Prince George's County -- Line 15

Principal Arterial

Interstate

Primary

103,400 - 245,000

110,000 - 260,000


STATE SYSTEM :


PROJECTED (2035) -


Study to widen I-495 and determine the feasibility of managed lanes from the American Legion Bridge to the Woodrow Wilson Bridge (42.2 miles).

I-95/I-495, Branch Ave. Metro Access Phase 2 (Line 1)I-95/I-495, Bridge Replacement over Suitland Road (Line 2)I-95/I-495, Bridge Replacement over Suitland Parkway (Line 3)MD 4, Interchange at Suitland Parkway (Line 6)I-95/I-495, Interchange Reconstuction at Greenbelt Metor Station (Prince George's County Line 16)Purple Line Study (MTA Program Line 31)

Project on hold.

None.

Increasing growth and development in Montgomery and Prince George's counties and the concurrent increase in traffic causes the Capital Beltway to experience severe congestion.JUSTIFICATION:

PROJECT:

DESCRIPTION:


STATUS:







PHASE


TOTALESTIMATED

COST($000)

EXPENDTHRU

CURRENTYEAR YEAR

SIXYEARTOTAL

BALANCETO


11,044000

11,0449,717

11,044000

11,0449,717

000000

000000

000000

000000

000000

000000

000000

000000

BUDGET


2017 2018 2019 ....2020.... ....2021.... ....2022.... ....2023....

PROJECT CASH FLOW

PAGE ____________SHA-PG-15The estimated cost is for the entire project in Prince George's and Montgomery counties.STIP REFERENCE #AW5181 08/01/2017


Principal Arterial

Interstate

Primary

220,000

242,100


STATE SYSTEM :


PROJECTED (2035) -


Construct a full interchange along I-95/I-495 at the Greenbelt Metro Station and extensions of acceleration and deceleration lanes along I-95/I-495 from US 1 to MD 201.


Project on hold.

Cost decrease of $158.6 million is due to the transferance of funds to the Howard Street Tunnel project. Reallocated due to the GSA decision to cancel the FBI headquarters project.

This interchange would improve traffic operations on mainline I-95/I-495 and provide access for a proposed joint use development at the Greenbelt Metro Station.JUSTIFICATION:

PROJECT:

DESCRIPTION:


STATUS:







PHASE


TOTALESTIMATED

COST($000)

EXPENDTHRU

CURRENTYEAR YEAR

SIXYEARTOTAL

BALANCETO


1,56110,963

1380

12,66212,386

1,5619,569

1380

11,26810,992

01,394

00

1,3941,394

000000

000000

000000

000000

000000

01,394

00

1,3941,394

000000

BUDGET


2017 2018 2019 ....2020.... ....2021.... ....2022.... ....2023....

PROJECT CASH FLOW



Principal Arterial

Interstate

Primary

111,500 - 245,000

119,000 - 260,000


STATE SYSTEM :


PROJECTED (2035) -

I-495, Capital Beltway

Planning study of I-495 improvements from the current terminus of high occupancy toll (HOT) lane facilities in Virginia to the Baltimore Washington Parkway, including the American Legion Bridge.

I-495, Inner Loop Resurfacing (Line 2)I-95/I-495, Capital Beltway Study (Line 3)I-95/I-495, Interchange Reconstuction at Greenbelt Metro Station (Prince George's County Line 16)

Planning underway.

Study limits extended east from I-270 to the Baltimore Washington Parkway.

Increasing growth and the concurrent increase in traffic is causing I-495 to experience severe congestion.JUSTIFICATION:

PROJECT:

DESCRIPTION:


STATUS:






FEDERALPOTENTIAL FUNDING SOURCE:

PHASE


TOTALESTIMATED

COST($000)

EXPENDTHRU

CURRENTYEAR YEAR

SIXYEARTOTAL

BALANCETO


6,000000

6,0000

2,080000

2,0800

500000

5000

1,250000

1,2500

1,020000

1,0200

1,150000

1,1500

000000

000000

3,920000

3,9200

000000

BUDGET


2017 2018 2019 ....2020.... ....2021.... ....2022.... ....2023....

PROJECT CASH FLOW

PAGE ____________SHA-PG-17STIP REFERENCE #MO8382 08/01/2017

PRIMARY DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION PROGRAMSTATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION -- Prince George's County -- Line 18

Principal Arterial


Primary

67,125 - 85,825

78,375 - 124,800


STATE SYSTEM :


PROJECTED (2035) -

MD 3, Robert Crain Highway

Study to upgrade MD 3 from US 50 to MD 32 to address safety and capacity concerns (8.9 miles). Bicycle and pedestrian access will be provided where appropriate.

US 50, East of Lottsford Vista Road to Anne Arundel County Line - Westbound (Line 4)US 301, South Corridor Transportation Study (Line 24)US 301, North of Mount Oak Road to US 50 (Line 25)MD 450, Stonybrook Drive to west of MD 3 (Line 32)

Planning on hold.

None.

This project will improve safety and operations and relieve congestion in this heavily traveled corridor.JUSTIFICATION:

PROJECT:

DESCRIPTION:


STATUS:







PHASE


TOTALESTIMATED

COST($000)

EXPENDTHRU

CURRENTYEAR YEAR

SIXYEARTOTAL

BALANCETO


3,8720

4,6730

8,5453,097

3,8720

4,6730

8,5453,097

000000

000000

000000

000000

000000

000000

000000

000000

BUDGET


2017 2018 2019 ....2020.... ....2021.... ....2022.... ....2023....

PROJECT CASH FLOW

PAGE ____________SHA-PG-18The estimated cost is for the entire project in Prince George's and Anne Arundel counties.STIP REFERENCE #AT1981 08/01/2017



Freeway/Expressway

Primary

72,725

99,325


STATE SYSTEM :


PROJECTED (2035) -


Upgrade existing MD 4 to a multilane freeway from MD 223 to I-95/I-495 (Capital Beltway) (3.1 miles). Bicycles and pedestrians will be accommodated where appropriate. (BRAC Related)

MD 4, Interchange at Suitland Parkway (Line 6)I-95/I-495, American Legion Bridge to Woodrow Wilson Bridge (Line 15)MD 223, Steed Road to MD 4 (Line 31)

Planning complete.

None.

Severe traffic congestion occurs during peak hours and will increase with planned development in the immediate area.JUSTIFICATION:

PROJECT:

DESCRIPTION:


STATUS:







PHASE


TOTALESTIMATED

COST($000)

EXPENDTHRU

CURRENTYEAR YEAR

SIXYEARTOTAL

BALANCETO


1,615000

1,615786

1,615000

1,615786

000000

000000

000000

000000

000000

000000

000000

000000

BUDGET


2017 2018 2019 ....2020.... ....2021.... ....2022.... ....2023....

PROJECT CASH FLOW



Principal Arterial

Freeway/Expressway

Primary

146,900

164,375


STATE SYSTEM :


PROJECTED (2035) -

MD 5, Branch Avenue

Study to upgrade existing MD 5 to a multilane freeway from US 301 interchange at T.B. to north of I-95/I-495 Capital Beltway (10.5 miles). Bicycles and pedestrians will be accommodated where appropriate.

I-95/I-495, Branch Avenue Metro Station Access - Phase 2 (Line 1)I-95/I-495 American Legion Bridge to Woodrow Wilson Bridge (Line 15)MD 5, Improvements at Linda Lane (Line 21)US 301, South Corridor Transportation Study (Line 24)US 301, Study to upgrade Intersections at MD 5 and MD 228/MD 5 BU (Line 26)MD 223, Steed Road to MD 5 (Line 31)

Planning underway. Currently evaluating breakouts for needed short term safety improvements and capacity.

None.

Severe traffic congestion occurs during peak hours, especially at signalized intersections. High accident rates exist at a number of the at-grade intersections along this section of MD 5. Traffic volumes will continue to increase as southern Prince George's County and Charles County continue to develop.

JUSTIFICATION:

PROJECT:

DESCRIPTION:


STATUS:



Project Inside PFA GrandfatheredProject Outside PFAX

Exception GrantedPFA Status Yet To Be DeterminedException Will Be RequiredX



PHASE


TOTALESTIMATED

COST($000)

EXPENDTHRU

CURRENTYEAR YEAR

SIXYEARTOTAL

BALANCETO


4,0911,7248,169

013,9847,212

4,0711,7248,169

013,9647,212

20000

200

000000

000000

000000

000000

000000

20000

200

000000

BUDGET


2017 2018 2019 ....2020.... ....2021.... ....2022.... ....2023....

PROJECT CASH FLOW



Principal Arterial

Freeway/Expressway

Primary

135,600

145,000


STATE SYSTEM :


PROJECTED (2035) -

MD 5, Branch Avenue

Geometric improvements at MD 5 and Linda Lane.

I-95/I-495, American Legion Bridge to Woodrow Wilson Bridge (Line 15)MD 5, US 301 at T.B. to north of I-95/I-495 (Line 20)

Engineering underway.

None.

Project improves operations at MD 5 and Linda Lane.JUSTIFICATION:

PROJECT:

DESCRIPTION:


STATUS:







PHASE


TOTALESTIMATED

COST($000)

EXPENDTHRU

CURRENTYEAR YEAR

SIXYEARTOTAL

BALANCETO


03,100

00

3,1003,081

0515

00

515496

0750

00

750750

0742

00

742742

0793

00

793793

0300

00

300300

000000

000000

02,585

00

2,5852,585

000000

BUDGET


2017 2018 2019 ....2020.... ....2021.... ....2022.... ....2023....

PROJECT CASH FLOW




Freeway/Expressway

Primary

83,450

103,875


STATE SYSTEM :


PROJECTED (2035) -

MD 210, Indian Head Highway

Multimodal transportation study to relieve traffic congestion along MD 210 and improve intersections from I-95/I-495 to MD 228 (10.0 miles). Bicycles and pedestrians will be accommodated where appropriate.

MD 210, Interchange at Kerby Hill Road/Livingston Road (Line 9)I-95/I-495, American Legion Bridge to Woodrow Wilson Bridge (Line 15)

Engineering to begin during budget fiscal year.

The cost increase of $12.8 million is due to the funds becoming available from Greenbelt to advance projects in partnership with Prince George's County along the MD 210 Corridor.

Increased development along this corridor has caused MD 210 to have severe congestion during peak periods.JUSTIFICATION:

PROJECT:

DESCRIPTION:


STATUS:







PHASE


TOTALESTIMATED

COST($000)

EXPENDTHRU

CURRENTYEAR YEAR

SIXYEARTOTAL

BALANCETO


3,05812,766

9820

16,80612,766

3,0581

9820

4,0411

000000

02,553

00

2,5532,553

02,553

00

2,5532,553

02,553

00

2,5532,553

02,553

00

2,5532,553

02,553

00

2,5532,553

012,765

00

12,76512,765

000000

BUDGET


2017 2018 2019 ....2020.... ....2021.... ....2022.... ....2023....

PROJECT CASH FLOW



Principal Arterial

Freeway/Expressway

Primary

126,875

154,800


STATE SYSTEM :


PROJECTED (2035) -

US 50, John Hanson Highway

Feasibility study to investigate improving traffic capacity and operations for US 50 from the D.C. Line to MD 704 (5.0 milles).

US 50, East of Lottsford Vista Rd. to Anne Arundel County Line - Westbound (Line 4) I-95/I-495, American Legion Bridge to Woodrow Wilson (Line 15)

Planning complete.

None.

This section of US 50 was identified as highly congested in the 2013 Maryland State Highway Mobility Report.JUSTIFICATION:

PROJECT:

DESCRIPTION:


STATUS:







PHASE


TOTALESTIMATED

COST($000)

EXPENDTHRU

CURRENTYEAR YEAR

SIXYEARTOTAL

BALANCETO


500000

5000

500000

5000

000000

000000

000000

000000

000000

000000

000000

000000

BUDGET


2017 2018 2019 ....2020.... ....2021.... ....2022.... ....2023....

PROJECT CASH FLOW



Principal Arterial


Primary

22,900 (Charles) - 87,800 (Prince George's)



STATE SYSTEM :


PROJECTED (2035) -

US 301, South Corridor Transportation Study

The South Corridor Transportation Study is a multimodal study of US 301 corridor highway and transit improvements between the Potomac River/Virginia State Line and I-595/US 50 (50.3 miles).

US 50, East of Lottsford Vista Road to Anne Arundel County Line - Westbound (Line 4) MD 5, Interchange at MD 373 and Brandywine Road Relocated (Line 8)MD 3, US 50 to MD 32 (Line 18)MD 5, US 301 at T.B. to North of I-95/I-495 (Line 20)US 301, North of Mount Oak Road to US 50 (Line 25)US 301, Intersections at MD 5 and MD 228/MD 5BU (Line 26)

Planning on hold.

None.

This study will address transportation needs and consider related environmental and growth management issues.JUSTIFICATION:

PROJECT:

DESCRIPTION:


STATUS:


SMART GROWTH STATUS: Project Not Location SpecificX

Project Inside PFA GrandfatheredProject Outside PFA




PHASE


TOTALESTIMATED

COST($000)

EXPENDTHRU

CURRENTYEAR YEAR

SIXYEARTOTAL

BALANCETO


10,7500

45,0080

55,75811,881

10,7500

45,0080

55,75811,881

000000

000000

000000

000000

000000

000000

000000

000000

BUDGET


2017 2018 2019 ....2020.... ....2021.... ....2022.... ....2023....

PROJECT CASH FLOW

PAGE ____________SHA-PG-24The estimated cost is for the entire project in Prince George's and Charles counties.STIP REFERENCE #AW5341 08/01/2017


Principal Arterial


Primary

69,175 (US 301) 22,500 (MD 197)

122,000 (US 301) 33,500 (MD 197)


STATE SYSTEM :


PROJECTED (2035) -

US 301, Crain Highway

Study to upgrade and widen US 301 from, north of Mount Oak Road to US 50 (2.0 miles), and MD 197 from US 301 to Mitchellville Road (0.3 miles). Bicycles and pedestrians will be accommodated where appropriate.

US 50, East of Lottsford Vista Rd. to Anne Arundel County Line - Westbound (Line 4) MD 3, US 50 to MD 32 (Line 18)US 301, South Corridor Transportation Study (Line 24)

Project on hold.

None.

Improvements are needed to accommodate the existing and projected high volumes of traffic generated by continuous growth along the US 301 corridor and to address existing safety problems.

JUSTIFICATION:

PROJECT:

DESCRIPTION:


STATUS:







PHASE


TOTALESTIMATED

COST($000)

EXPENDTHRU

CURRENTYEAR YEAR

SIXYEARTOTAL

BALANCETO


2,504000

2,5040

2,504000

2,5040

000000

000000

000000

000000

000000

000000

000000

000000

BUDGET


2017 2018 2019 ....2020.... ....2021.... ....2022.... ....2023....

PROJECT CASH FLOW



Principal Arterial


Primary




STATE SYSTEM :


PROJECTED (2035) -

US 301, Crain Highway

Study to upgrade US 301 intersections at MD 5 and MD 228/MD 5BU.

MD 5, Interchange at MD 373 and Brandywine Road Relocated (Line 8)MD 5, US 301 to I-95/I-495 (Line 20)US 301, South Corridor Transportation Study (Line 24)

Planning underway.

None.

US 301 corridor improvements will improve safety, reduce congestion, and provide capacity for planned development.JUSTIFICATION:

PROJECT:

DESCRIPTION:


STATUS:




Exception GrantedPFA Status Yet To Be DeterminedXException Will Be Required



PHASE


TOTALESTIMATED

COST($000)

EXPENDTHRU

CURRENTYEAR YEAR

SIXYEARTOTAL

BALANCETO


14,636000

14,6368,869

11,423000

11,4238,069

600000

600600

1,813000

1,813200

800000

8000

000000

000000

000000

3,213000

3,213800

000000

BUDGET


2017 2018 2019 ....2020.... ....2021.... ....2022.... ....2023....

PROJECT CASH FLOW

PAGE ____________SHA-PG-26The estimated cost is for the entire project in Prince George's and Charles counties.STIP REFERENCE #CH2031 08/01/2017

SECONDARY DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION PROGRAMSTATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION -- Prince George's County -- Line 27

Minor Arterial


Secondary

20,000 - 37,500 (MD 28) 16,800 - 47,000 (MD 198)

28,000 - 50,000 (MD 28) 24,000 - 58,500 (MD 198)


STATE SYSTEM :


PROJECTED (2035) -

MD 28, Norbeck Road, and MD 198, Spencerville Road/Sandy Spring Road

Study of MD 28/MD 198 corridor safety, capacity, and operational improvements in Montgomery and Prince George's counties, between MD 97 and I-95 (11.1 miles). Bicycle and pedestrian accommodations will be included where appropriate.

MD 97 Interchange Construction at MD 28 (Line 19)

Planning underway.

None.

This project would address safety in the MD 28/MD 198 corridor. This project would also reduce traffic congestion and improve traffic operations.JUSTIFICATION:

PROJECT:

DESCRIPTION:


STATUS:



Project Inside PFA GrandfatheredProject Outside PFAX

Exception GrantedPFA Status Yet To Be DeterminedException Will Be RequiredX



PHASE


TOTALESTIMATED

COST($000)

EXPENDTHRU

CURRENTYEAR YEAR

SIXYEARTOTAL

BALANCETO


7,032000

7,0323,207

6,738000

6,7383,207

294000

2940

000000

000000

000000

000000

000000

294000

2940

000000

BUDGET


2017 2018 2019 ....2020.... ....2021.... ....2022.... ....2023....

PROJECT CASH FLOW

PAGE ____________SHA-PG-27The estimated cost is for the entire project in Prince George's and Montgomery counties.STIP REFERENCE #MO8861 08/01/2017




Secondary

33,000

40,700


STATE SYSTEM :


PROJECTED (2035) -

MD 197, Collington Road

Upgrade and widen existing MD 197 to a multilane divided highway from Kenhill Drive to MD 450 Relocated (1.4 miles). Sidewalks will be included where appropriate. Wide curb lanes will accommodate bicycles.

Engineering underway. County contributed $1.0 million to planning study.

None.

Additional lanes are needed to accommodate increasing volumes of traffic. This improvement would provide better access to the City of Bowie.JUSTIFICATION:

PROJECT:

DESCRIPTION:


STATUS:







PHASE


TOTALESTIMATED

COST($000)

EXPENDTHRU

CURRENTYEAR YEAR

SIXYEARTOTAL

BALANCETO


1,59510,554

00

12,1490

1,5952,069

00

3,6640

02,424

00

2,4240

02,424

00

2,4240

02,424

00

2,4240

01,213

00

1,2130

000000

000000

08,485

00

8,4850

000000

BUDGET


2017 2018 2019 ....2020.... ....2021.... ....2022.... ....2023....

PROJECT CASH FLOW



Minor Arterial


Secondary

47,750

65,500


STATE SYSTEM :


PROJECTED (2035) -

MD 201 Extended (Edmonston Road)/US 1 (Baltimore Ave.)

Study of capacity improvements on MD 201 and US 1 from I-95/I-495 (Capital Beltway) to north of Muirkirk Road (7.1 miles). Bicycle and pedestrian access will be considered as part of this project.

I-95/I-495, American Legion Bridge to Woodrow Wilson Bridge (Line 15)US 1, MD 193 to I-95/I-495 (Capital Beltway) (Line 33)

Project on hold.

None.

US 1 and MD 201 are over capacity and experience severe congestion during peak periods. The existing local roadway network is inadequate. The industrial and employment centers in the area are being developed, which is expected to further increase traffic.

JUSTIFICATION:

PROJECT:

DESCRIPTION:


STATUS:




Exception GrantedPFA Status Yet To Be DeterminedXException Will Be Required



PHASE


TOTALESTIMATED

COST($000)

EXPENDTHRU

CURRENTYEAR YEAR

SIXYEARTOTAL

BALANCETO


6,839000

6,8390

6,839000

6,8390

000000

000000

000000

000000

000000

000000

000000

000000

BUDGET


2017 2018 2019 ....2020.... ....2021.... ....2022.... ....2023....

PROJECT CASH FLOW



Minor Arterial


Secondary

55,850

72,050


STATE SYSTEM :


PROJECTED (2035) -

MD 202, Largo Road

Improve the MD 202 intersection at Brightseat Road. This improvement will enhance capacity, operations and safety of the intersection. Pedestrian and bicycle facilities will be included where appropriate.

I-95/495, American Legion Bridge to Woodrow Wilson Bridge (Line 15)

Project on hold.

None.

This project will provide improved access to the Landover Mall which is being planned for revitalization by the County.JUSTIFICATION:

PROJECT:

DESCRIPTION:


STATUS:







PHASE


TOTALESTIMATED

COST($000)

EXPENDTHRU

CURRENTYEAR YEAR

SIXYEARTOTAL

BALANCETO


0462

00

4620

0462

00

4620

000000

000000

000000

000000

000000

000000

000000

000000

BUDGET


2017 2018 2019 ....2020.... ....2021.... ....2022.... ....2023....

PROJECT CASH FLOW



Minor Arterial


Secondary

42,450

52,400


STATE SYSTEM :


PROJECTED (2035) -

MD 223, Piscataway Road

A study to establish a long term vision for the MD 223 Corridor, from Steed Road to MD 4 (7.9 miles). Bicycle and pedestrian facilities will be included where appropriate.

MD 4, MD 223 to I-95/I-495 (Capital Beltway) (Line 19)MD 5, US 301 at TB to I-95/495 (Line 20)

Corridor Study complete.

None.

Increased development along the MD 223 corridor has caused traffic congestion during peak hours. A long term vision for the corridor is needed, from which a series of short-term safety and operational improvements can be developed and prioritized.

JUSTIFICATION:

PROJECT:

DESCRIPTION:


STATUS:







PHASE


TOTALESTIMATED

COST($000)

EXPENDTHRU

CURRENTYEAR YEAR

SIXYEARTOTAL

BALANCETO


1,293000

1,293594

1,293000

1,293594

000000

000000

000000

000000

000000

000000

000000

000000

BUDGET


2017 2018 2019 ....2020.... ....2021.... ....2022.... ....2023....

PROJECT CASH FLOW



Minor Arterial


Secondary

29,750

61,850


STATE SYSTEM :


PROJECTED (2035) -

MD 450, Annapolis Road

Upgrade and widen existing MD 450 to a multilane divided highway from Stonybrook Drive to west of MD 3 (1.4 miles). Bicycle and pedestrian facilities will be included where appropriate.

MD 3, US 50 to MD 32 (Line 18)

Project on hold.

None.

Additional lanes are needed to accommodate increasing volumes of traffic. This improvement would provide better access to developing areas of central Prince George's County.JUSTIFICATION:

PROJECT:

DESCRIPTION:


STATUS:







PHASE


TOTALESTIMATED

COST($000)

EXPENDTHRU

CURRENTYEAR YEAR

SIXYEARTOTAL

BALANCETO


01,486

00

1,4861,189

01,486

00

1,4861,189

000000

000000

000000

000000

000000

000000

000000

000000

BUDGET


2017 2018 2019 ....2020.... ....2021.... ....2022.... ....2023....

PROJECT CASH FLOW





Secondary

48,875

66,825


STATE SYSTEM :


PROJECTED (2035) -

US 1, Baltimore Avenue

Reconstruct US 1 from MD 193 to I-95 (Capital Beltway) (Segments 2 and 3) (1.1 miles). Bicycle and pedestrian facilities will be included where appropriate.

US 1, College Avenue to MD 193 (Segment 1) (Line 14)I-95/I-495, American Legion Bridge to Woodrow Wilson Bridge (Line 15)MD 201 Extended/US 1, I-95/I-495 to north of Muirkirk Road (Line 29)

Project on hold

None.

Major traffic congestion is experienced along this segment of US 1. This project would improve traffic operations, pedestrian circulation, and safety. This project would also accommodate planned revitalization within College Park.

JUSTIFICATION:

PROJECT:

DESCRIPTION:


STATUS:







PHASE


TOTALESTIMATED

COST($000)

EXPENDTHRU

CURRENTYEAR YEAR

SIXYEARTOTAL

BALANCETO


1,387000

1,3870

1,387000

1,3870

000000

000000

000000

000000

000000

000000

000000

000000

BUDGET


2017 2018 2019 ....2020.... ....2021.... ....2022.... ....2023....

PROJECT CASH FLOW


SAFETY, CONGESTION RELIEF, HIGHWAY AND BRIDGE PRESERVATION PROGRAM

ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION AND IMPROVEMENT TYPE

CONSTRUCTIONTOTALESTIMATED

COST($000's)

STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION -- PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY LINE 34

ROUTE NO.

August 1, 2017

STARTStatus as of

Fiscal Year 2017 Completions

Resurface/Rehabilitate

2,3081 CompletedLargo Road; Brightseat to MD 704; resurfaceMD 202

4,0482 CompletedCrain Highway; 481 ft south of Excalibur Road to 1800 ft north of MD 3 structure 16236; resurfaceUS 301

5,1143 CompletedSt. Barnabas Road; I-95 to MD 5; resurfaceMD 414

3,1064 CompletedNew Hampshire Avenue; North of Merrimac Drive to Montgomery County line; resurfaceMD 650

1,8415 CompletedMartin Luther King Jr Highway; Ardwick Ardmore Road to 92nd Avenue; resurfaceMD 704

Bridge Replacement/Rehabilitation

2,1446 CompletedBridge 1612000, 1612200, 1612300, 1615905, 1615906, 1617400 and 1621400 along I-495, MD 197; clean/paint bridges

I 495

Safety/Spot Improvement

8,1237 CompletedBaltimore Avenue; at Ammendale Road; drainage improvementUS 1

6,5708 CompletedSandy Spring Road; Riding Stable Road to I-95 and mainline I-95 south of ICC to Howard County line; resurface

MD 198

Fiscal Years 2018 and 2019

Resurface/Rehabilitate

14,4589 Under constructionAt various locations in Prince George's County; mill and resurface

3,79510 FY 2018Rhode Island Avenue; North of ICC to Oak Street; safety and resurfaceUS 1

PAGE _________SHA-PG-34




COST($000's)

STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION -- PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY LINE 34 (cont'd)

ROUTE NO.

August 1, 2017

STARTStatus as of

Fiscal Years 2018 and 2019 (cont'd)

Resurface/Rehabilitate (cont'd)

3,02111 Under constructionBladensburg Road; DC line to Anacostia River bridge; resurfaceUS 1 Alt

3,52612 Under constructionBranch Avenue; Surratts Road to MD 223; safety and resurfaceFunding provided by the Governor’s Investment in Highways and Bridges Initiative

MD 5

5,14413 FY 2018Branch Avenue; Moores Road to Surratts Road; safety and resurfaceFunding provided by the Governor’s Investment in Highways and Bridges Initiative

MD 5

5,49414 Under constructionUniversity Boulevard; Campus Drive to US 1; resurfaceMD 193

4,04115 FY 2018Kenilworth Avenue; DC line to Lawrence Street; safety and resurfaceMD 201

2,82816 Under constructionLargo Road; US 50 to MD 450 (Annapolis Road); safety and resurfaceMD 202

3,51017 FY 2018Indian Head Highway; Farmington Road to Old Fort Road; safety and resurfaceFunding provided by the Governor’s Investment in Highways and Bridges Initiative

MD 210 NB

2,12018 FY 2018Crain Highway; South Osborne Road to MD 381 (Old Crain Highway); safety and resurfaceUS 301

1,34919 Under constructionMartin Luther King Jr Highway; Hill Road to Greenleaf Road; resurfaceMD 704

Bridge Replacement/Rehabilitation

2,80320 FY 2018Various bridges on US 1, US 301, MD 4, MD 5 and MD 214; clean/paint bridges

Safety/Spot Improvement

1,65421 FY 2018At various locations in Prince George's County; drainage improvementFunding provided by the Governor’s Investment in Highways and Bridges Initiative

PAGE _________SHA-PG-35




COST($000's)


ROUTE NO.

August 1, 2017

STARTStatus as of


Safety/Spot Improvement (cont'd)

1,77522 Under constructionOn MD 4 and MD 214; drainage improvement

2,93123 FY 2018Crain Highway; at Forest Drive; geometric improvementsFunding provided by the Governor’s Investment in Highways and Bridges Initiative

MD 3

32324 FY 2018Central Avenue; at I-95/495; geometric improvementsFunding provided by the Governor’s Investment in Highways and Bridges Initiative

MD 214

Urban Reconstruction

8,70725 Under constructionBranch Avenue; Curtis Drive to north of Suitland Parkway/Naylor Road from Branch Avenue; urban reconstruction (Transportation Infrastructure Investment Act of 2013)

MD 5

9,62326 Under constructionKenilworth Avenue; Kenilworth Towers to Riverdale Road; urban reconstruction(Transportation Infrastructure Investment Act of 2013)

MD 201

7,13827 FY 2018Powder Mill Road; Pine Street to the US 1 intersection; urban reconstructionMD 212 A

Noise Barriers

2,23528 Under constructionJohn Hanson Highway; at MD 410; noise abatement(Transportation Infrastructure Investment Act of 2013)

US 50

Traffic Management

3,85229 Under constructionMD 202 & MD 214 with APS/CPS; signalizationFunding provided by the Governor’s Investment in Highways and Bridges Initiative

2,12230 Under constructionAt I-495 interchange; lightingI 95

PAGE _________SHA-PG-36




COST($000's)


ROUTE NO.

August 1, 2017

STARTStatus as of


Traffic Management (cont'd)

1,52231 FY 2018Central Avenue; I-495 and MD 202; signingMD 214

Environmental Preservation

1,03132 FY 2018IRVM, native plants - 1000 feet west of I-495/95 to AA County line - Phase 2; landscape

45333 Under constructionAnacostia Gateway Park ; landscape

2,20734 Under constructionJohn Hanson Highway; West of I-95 to the AA County line; landscapeUS 50

4,34735 FY 2018Capital Beltway; IRVM, VEG MGMT - MO/PG County line to MD/VA line - Phase 1; landscapeI 495

Truck Weight

2,23536 Under constructionJohn F Kennedy Memorial Highway; College Park Weigh Station; weigh station

TMDL Compliance

24137 FY 2018Rosaryville State Park; drainage improvement (reimbursed by DNR)

5,60038 FY 2018Charles Branch Tributaries; wetlands replacement

2,19339 Under constructionIndian Head Highway; Along MD 210; drainage improvement(Transportation Infrastructure Investment Act of 2013)

MD 210

PAGE _________SHA-PG-37




COST($000's)


ROUTE NO.

August 1, 2017

STARTStatus as of


Enhancements

Pedestrian/Bicycle Facilities

40440 FY 2018Bowie Heritage Trail, Phase I; construct asphalt trail at Zug Road to MD 564 bridge

PAGE _________SHA-PG-38

MEMORANDUM - City of Bowie

Documents

Transcript of MEMORANDUM - City of Bowie