MEMORANDUM - montgomerycountymd.gov€¦ · AGENDA ITEMS 11-14 June 23, 2015 Public Hearing/Action...

31
AGENDA ITEMS 11-14 June 23, 2015 Public Hearing/Action MEMORANDUM June 19,2015 TO: County Council G-o FROM: Glenn Orlin, Deputy Council Administrator SUBJECT: Public Hearing/Action: Expedited Bill 26-15, Special Capital Improvements Project - MCPS and M- NCPPC Maintenance Facilities Relocation Expedited Bill 27-15, Special Capital Improvements Project Council Office Building Renovation Expedited Bill 28-15, Special Capital Improvements Project - Snouffer School Road Expedited Bill 29-15, Special Capital Improvements Project - Metropolitan Branch Trail Expedited Bills 26-15 through 29-15, Special Capital Improvements Project, sponsored by Lead Sponsor Council President at the request of the COilllty Executive, was introduced on June 9, 2015. Action is scheduled following this hearing. Section §302 of the County Charter and Section §20-1 of the County Code require certain capital improvement projects to be individually authorized by law if the locally-funded cost is projected to exceed $14,431,000 in FY16 dollars. This packet contains: Circle # Expedited Bill 26-15 1 Legislative Request Report for Bill 26-15 3 Memo from County Executive 5 Fiscal and Economic Impact statement 6 Expedited Bi1l27-15 9 Legislative Request Report for Bill 27-15 11 Memo from County Executive 12 Fiscal and Economic Impact statement 13 Expedited Bill 28-15 16 Legislative Request Report for Bi1l28-15 18 Memo from County Executive 19 Fiscal and Economic Impact statement 20 Expedited Bill 29-15 23 Legislative Request Report for Bill 29-15 25 Memo from County Executive 27 Fiscal and Economic Impact statement 28

Transcript of MEMORANDUM - montgomerycountymd.gov€¦ · AGENDA ITEMS 11-14 June 23, 2015 Public Hearing/Action...

Page 1: MEMORANDUM - montgomerycountymd.gov€¦ · AGENDA ITEMS 11-14 June 23, 2015 Public Hearing/Action . MEMORANDUM . June 19,2015 . TO: County Council

AGENDA ITEMS 11-14 June 23, 2015

Public Hearing/Action

MEMORANDUM

June 19,2015

TO: County Council

G-o FROM: Glenn Orlin, Deputy Council Administrator

SUBJECT: Public Hearing/Action: Expedited Bill 26-15, Special Capital Improvements Project - MCPS and M­NCPPC Maintenance Facilities Relocation Expedited Bill 27-15, Special Capital Improvements Project Council Office Building Renovation Expedited Bill 28-15, Special Capital Improvements Project - Snouffer School Road Expedited Bill 29-15, Special Capital Improvements Project - Metropolitan Branch Trail

Expedited Bills 26-15 through 29-15, Special Capital Improvements Project, sponsored by Lead Sponsor Council President at the request ofthe COilllty Executive, was introduced on June 9, 2015. Action is scheduled following this hearing.

Section §302 of the County Charter and Section §20-1 of the County Code require certain capital improvement projects to be individually authorized by law if the locally-funded cost is projected to exceed $14,431,000 in FY16 dollars.

This packet contains: Circle # Expedited Bill 26-15 1

Legislative Request Report for Bill 26-15 3 Memo from County Executive 5 Fiscal and Economic Impact statement 6

Expedited Bi1l27-15 9 Legislative Request Report for Bill 27-15 11 Memo from County Executive 12 Fiscal and Economic Impact statement 13

Expedited Bill 28-15 16 Legislative Request Report for Bi1l28-15 18 Memo from County Executive 19 Fiscal and Economic Impact statement 20

Expedited Bill 29-15 23 Legislative Request Report for Bill 29-15 25 Memo from County Executive 27 Fiscal and Economic Impact statement 28

Page 2: MEMORANDUM - montgomerycountymd.gov€¦ · AGENDA ITEMS 11-14 June 23, 2015 Public Hearing/Action . MEMORANDUM . June 19,2015 . TO: County Council

Expedited Bill No. 26-15 Concerning: Special Capital

Improvements Project - MCPS and M-NCPPC Maintenance Facilities Relocation

Revised: May 26, 2015 Draft No. Introduced: June 9,2015 Expires: December 9,2016 Enacted: __________ Executive: _________ Effective: _--:-:________ Sunset Date: ....!N.!!:o~n~e_:___=____ Ch. __, Laws of Mont. Co. ___

COUNTY COUNCIL FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND

Lead Sponsor: Council President at the Request of the County Executive

AN EXPEDITED ACT to authorize the planning, design, and construction of the MCPS & M­NCPPC Maintenance Facilities Relocation, Project No. 361109, in the Montgomery Village! Airpark Policy Area.

By adding to the laws of Montgomery County 2015

Boldface Heading or defined term. UnderlininQ Added to existing law by original bill. i(Single boldface brackets] Deletedfrom existing law by original bill. nnt Inl~ l ..I. -I: • Added by amendment. [[Double boldface brackets]] Deletedfrom existing law or the bill by amendment. * * * Existing law unaffected by bill.

The County Council for Montgomery County, Maryland approves the following Act:

Page 3: MEMORANDUM - montgomerycountymd.gov€¦ · AGENDA ITEMS 11-14 June 23, 2015 Public Hearing/Action . MEMORANDUM . June 19,2015 . TO: County Council

Expedited Bill No. 26-15

Sec.1. The laws of Montgomery County, Maryland, are amended to

2 add the following:

3 Montgomery County, Maryland, is authorized to plan, design, and construct

4 the MCPS & M-NCPPC Maintenance Facilities Relocation Project No. 361109, in

5 the Montgomery Village! Airpark Policy Area. This authorization includes all

6 necessary planning, design, equipment, and structures.

7 Sec. 2. Expedited Effective Date.

8 The Council declares that this legislation is necessary for the immediate protection

9 of the public interest. This Act takes effect on the date on which it becomes law.

10 Approved:

11

12

I3

George Leventhal, President, County Council

Approved:

Date

14

15

16

Isiah Leggett, County Executive

This is a correct copy o/Council action.

Date

17

Linda M. Lauer, Clerk of the Council Date

F:\LAw\BILLS\1526-1529 Special CIP Project<;\BiII 26-15 MCPS And MNCPPC Maintenance Facilities Relocations.Doc

Page 4: MEMORANDUM - montgomerycountymd.gov€¦ · AGENDA ITEMS 11-14 June 23, 2015 Public Hearing/Action . MEMORANDUM . June 19,2015 . TO: County Council

LEGISLATIVE REQUEST REPORT

Expedited Bill 26-15 Special Capital Improvements Project-MCPS and NfNCPPC Maintenance Facilities Relocation

DESCRIPTION:

PROBLEM:

GOALSAND OBJECTIVES:

COORDINATION:

FISCAL IMPACT:

ECONOMIC IMPACT:

EVALUATION:

EXPERIENCE ELSEWHERE:

SOURCE OF INFORMATION:

The County Executive requests that capital project No. 361109, MCPS & M-NCPPC Maintenance Facilities Relocation is authorized as a "Special Capital Improvements Project" pursuant to Section §302 of the County Charter and Section §20-1 of the Montgomery County Code.

Section §302 of the County Charter and Section §20-1 of the County Code require certain capital improvement projects to be individually authorized by law if the locally-funded cost is projected to exceed $14,431,000 in FY16 dollars. The estimated locally-funded cost of this project in the FY16 Capital Budget and FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program is $69,039,000 for planning, design, land, and construction costs.

This project provides for the planning, design, and construction of MCPS & M-NCPPC Maintenance Facilities Relocation. In order to implement the County's Shady Grove Sector Plan which would capitalize on the existing investment in mass transit by creating a transit-oriented development community, the County Service Park must be relocated. Relocation of the facilities at the County Service Park will enable the County to realize both the transit-oriented development intended for the area and address unmet needs.

This project has been coordinated with the Department of General Services, Department of Transportation, Montgomery County Public Schools, Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission, Department of Permitting Services, Department of Finance, Department of Technology Services, Office of Management and Budget, Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission, Pepco, Upcounty Regional Services Center, and Washington Gas.

Not Applicable.

The planned facilities will meet the current and projected maintenance facility needs while also furthering the County's transit­oriented development goals.

Capital projects are evaluated biennially by the County Executive and County Council as part of the Capital Improvements Program review.

Not Applicable.

Department ofTransportation.

Page 5: MEMORANDUM - montgomerycountymd.gov€¦ · AGENDA ITEMS 11-14 June 23, 2015 Public Hearing/Action . MEMORANDUM . June 19,2015 . TO: County Council

APPLICATION WITHIN MUNICIPALITIES: Not Applicable.

PENALTIES: None Required.

F:\LAW\BILLS\1526-1529 Special elP Projects\LRR For Bill 26-15.Dot

Page 6: MEMORANDUM - montgomerycountymd.gov€¦ · AGENDA ITEMS 11-14 June 23, 2015 Public Hearing/Action . MEMORANDUM . June 19,2015 . TO: County Council

lation

. .j . , ... I ..... I '.'

OFFICE OF THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND 20850

Isiah Leggett . County Executive

MEMORANDUM

May 19, 2015

TO: George Leventhal, President, County Council

FROM: lsiah Leggett, County Executi~~ SUBJECT: Special Capital Improvements Project Le

MCPS and M-NCPPC Maintenance Facilities Relocation (P361109)

In accordance with Section 302 ofthe County Charter and Section20-1 ofthe Montgomery County Code, I am forwarding the attached Special Capital Improvements Project Legislation Authorization and Legislative Request Report for MCPS & M-NCPPC Maintenance Facilities Relocation (p3611 09).

This request is necessary because the local cost of the above project now exceeds the FY16 Special Capital Improvements Project Legislation threshold of $14,431,000 as set by Executive Order. The purpose ofthe project is set forth below.

The MCPS and M-NCPPC Maintenance Facilities Relocation is part ofthe County Executive's comprehensive Smart Growth Initiative and provides for the design and construction ofnew facilities to accommodate the relocation ofthe Montgomery County Public Schools and Maryland-National Park and Planning Maintenance facilities from the County Service Park on Crabbs Branch Way to a site on Snouffer School Road in Gaithersburg known as the Webb Tract.

I recommend prompt passage ofthis legislation so as to advance this project.

IL: hpv

Attachments (4)

cc: Bonnie Kirkland, Assistant ChiefAdministrative Officer Jennifer A. Hughes, Director, Office ofManagement and Budget Alicia Thomas. Department ofTransportation

",7,;,

3montgomeryr;ountymd.gov/311 ". ,. 240-773-3556 TTY

Page 7: MEMORANDUM - montgomerycountymd.gov€¦ · AGENDA ITEMS 11-14 June 23, 2015 Public Hearing/Action . MEMORANDUM . June 19,2015 . TO: County Council

. i ·1

Fiscal Impact Statement Council BiU XX-IS Special Capital Improvements Project MCPS and M-NCPPC Maintenance Facilities Relocation

I. Legislative Summary.

Section §302 of the County Charter and Section §20~1 of the County Code require certain capital improvement projects to be individually authorized by law if the locally~funded cost is projected to exceed $14,431,000 in FY16 dollars. The Executive requested a bill for one project - MCPS and M-NCPPC Maintenance Facilities Relocation - that now requires Special Capital Improvement Project legislation.

2. An estimate of changes in County revenues and expenditures regardless ofwhether the revenues or expenditures are assumed in the recommended or approved budget. Includes source of information, assumptions, and methodologies used.

There are no expenditures or revenues associated with this bill. The bill only authorizes the designation ofthe MCPS and M-NCPPC Maintenance. Facilities Relocation as a Special Capital Improvement Project.

3. Revenue and expenditure estimates covering at least the next 6 fiscal years.

See item #2 above.

4. An actuarial analysis through the entire amortization period for each bill that would , i

affect retiree pension or group insurance costs.

Not applicable. There are no personnel costs associated with this bill.

5. Later actions that may affect future revenue and expenditures if the bill authorizes future spending.

Not applicable.

6. An estimate of the staff time needed to implement the bill.

Not applicable. This bill does not affect staff responsibilities.

7. An explanation of how the addition of new staff responsibilities would affect other duties.

Not applicable.

8. An estimate of costs wben an additional appropriation is needed.

Not applicable.

Page 8: MEMORANDUM - montgomerycountymd.gov€¦ · AGENDA ITEMS 11-14 June 23, 2015 Public Hearing/Action . MEMORANDUM . June 19,2015 . TO: County Council

1 .

9. A description of any variable that could affect revenue and cost estimates.

Not applicable.

10. Ranges of revenue or expenditures that are uncertain or difficult to project.

Not applicable.

11. If a bill is likely to have no fiscal impact, why that is the case.

This billautborizes the designation of the project as a Special Capital Improvement project. No new appropriation is required.

12. Other fiscal 'impacts or comments.

None.

13. The following contributed to and concurred with this analysis: (Enter name and department).

Helen P. Vallone, Office of Management and Budget.

, 5/19/t5Date

(jj

Page 9: MEMORANDUM - montgomerycountymd.gov€¦ · AGENDA ITEMS 11-14 June 23, 2015 Public Hearing/Action . MEMORANDUM . June 19,2015 . TO: County Council

__ I . _ I ..• :.' •. ~,. • :~ J • .". _ ".

Economic Impact Statement Councll Bill XX-IS, Special Capital Improvements Project

MCPS & M-NCPPC Maintenance Facilities Relocation

Background:

Section §302 ofthe County Charter and Section §20-1 ofthe County Code require certain capital improvement projects to be individually authorized by law ifthe locally-funded cost is projected to exceed $14,431,000 in FY16 dollars. The Executive requested a bill for one project - Montgomery County Public Schools and Maryland-National Park and Planning Commission (MCPS & M-NCPPC) Maintenance Facilities Relocation that now requires Special Capital Improvement Project legislation.

1. The sources of information, assumptions, and methodologies used.

This bill has no economic impact, as it serves only to authorize the designation ofthe MCPS & M-NCPPC Maintenance Facilities Relocation as a Special Capital Improvement Project.

2. A description ofany variable that could affect the economic impact estimates.

Not applicable. This bill has no economic impact, as it serves only to authorize the designation ofthe MCPS & M-NCPPC Maintenance Facilities Relocation as a Special Capital Improvement Project.

3. The Blll's positive or negative effect, if any on employment, spending, saving, investment, incomes, and property values in the County.

The bill has no economic impact - as it serves only to authorize the designation ofthe MCPS & M-NCPPC Maintenance Facilities Relocation as a Special Capital Improvement Project.

4. If a Bill is likely to have no economic impact, why is that the case?

The bill has no economic impact - as it serves only to authorize the designation of the MCPS & M-NCPPC Maintenance Facilities Relocation as a Special Capital Improvement Project.

5. The following contributed to and .concurred with this analysis: David Platt and Rob Hagedoom, Finance.

Page 1 of 1 (1).

Page 10: MEMORANDUM - montgomerycountymd.gov€¦ · AGENDA ITEMS 11-14 June 23, 2015 Public Hearing/Action . MEMORANDUM . June 19,2015 . TO: County Council

_________ _

Expedited Bill No. 27-15 Concerning: Special Capital

Improvements Project - Council Office Building Renovations

Revised: May 26, 2015 Draft No. L Introduced: June 9, 2015 Expires: December 9. 2016 Enacted: Executive: _________ Effective: __________ Sunset Date: ....!N..:.::o~n:.:::.e______ Ch. __, Laws of Mont. Co. ___

COUNTY COUNCIL FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND

Lead Sponsor: Council President at the Request of the County Executive

AN EXPEDITED ACT to authorize the planning, design, and construction of the Council Office Building Renovations, Project No. 010100 in the Rockville Town Center Policy Area.

By adding to the laws ofMontgomery County 2015

Boldface Heading or defined term. Underlinina Added to existing law by original bill. [Single boldface brackets] Deletedfrom existing law by original bill. Double underlinina Added by amendment. [[Double boldface brackets]] Deletedfrom existing law or the bill by amendment. * * * Existing law unaffected by bill.

The County Council for Montgomery County, Maryland approves the following Act.·

Page 11: MEMORANDUM - montgomerycountymd.gov€¦ · AGENDA ITEMS 11-14 June 23, 2015 Public Hearing/Action . MEMORANDUM . June 19,2015 . TO: County Council

Expedited Bill No. 27-15

Sec. I. The laws of Montgomery Connty, Maryland, are amended to

2 add the following:

3 Montgomery County, Maryland, is authorized to plan, design, and construct

4 the Council Office Building Renovations, Project No. 010100, in the Rockville

5 Town Center Policy Area. This authorization includes all necessary planning,

6 design, and construction.

7 Sec. 2. Expedited Effective Date.

8 The Council declares that this legislation is necessary for the immediate

9 protection of the public interest. This Act takes effect on the date on which it

10 becomes law.

11 Approved:

12

13

14

George Leventhal, President, County Council

Approved:

Date

15

16

17

Isiah Leggett, County Executive

This is a correct copy o/Council action.

Date

18

Linda M. Lauer, Clerk of the Council Date

2

F:\LAW\BILLS\1526·1529 Special CIP Projects\BjIJ 27·15 COB Renovations.Doc

Page 12: MEMORANDUM - montgomerycountymd.gov€¦ · AGENDA ITEMS 11-14 June 23, 2015 Public Hearing/Action . MEMORANDUM . June 19,2015 . TO: County Council

LEGISLATIVE REQUEST REPORT

Expedited Bill 27-15 Special Capital Improvements Project - Council Office Building Renovations

DESCRIPTION:

PROBLEM:

GOALS AND OBJECTIVES:

COORDINATION:

FISCAL IMPACT:

ECONOMIC IMPACT:

EVALUATION:

EXPERIENCE ELSEWHERE:

SOURCE OF INFORMATION:

PENALTIES:

The County Executive requests that capital project No. 010100, Council Office Building Renovations be authorized as a "Special Capital Improvements Project" pursuant to Section §302 of the County Charter and Section §20-1 ofthe Montgomery County Code.

Section §302 of the County Charter and Section §20-1 of the County Code require certain capital improvement projects to be individually authorized by law if the locally-funded cost is projected to exceed $14,431,000 in FY16 dollars. The estimated locally-funded cost of this project in the FY16 Capital Budget and FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program is $35,916,000 for planning, design, land, and construction costs.

This project provides for the development of a combined facility to include the planning, design, and construction of the Council Office Building Renovations.

This project has been coordinated with the Department of General Services, Department of Technology Services, Legislative Branch Office, Office of Consumer Protection, Department of Housing and Community Affairs, and the Ethics Commission.

Not Applicable.

This building renovation is needed in order to be updated the building for ADA and high performance building standards and to increase and renovate allocated space for Council functions.

Capital projects are evaluated biennially by the County Executive and County Council as part of the Capital Improvements Program review.

Not Applicable.

See Coordination.

None Required.

F:\LAW\BILLS\1 526-1 529 Special CIP Projects\LRR For Bill 27-1S.Dot

@)

Page 13: MEMORANDUM - montgomerycountymd.gov€¦ · AGENDA ITEMS 11-14 June 23, 2015 Public Hearing/Action . MEMORANDUM . June 19,2015 . TO: County Council

I

I.

OFFICE OF THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND 208S0

Isiah Leggett County Executive

MEMORANDUM

May 19,2015

TO: George Leventhal, President, County Council

..--~FROM: Isiah Leggett, County Executive

SUBJECT: Special Capital Improvements Project Legislation Council Office Building Renovations (pOl0100)

In accordance with Section 302 ofthe County Charter and Section 20-1 of the Montgomery County Code, I am forwarding the attached Special Capital Improvements Project Legislation Authorization and Legislative Request Report for Council Office Building Renovations (pO10100).

This request is necessary because the local cost of the above project now exceeds the FYl6 Special Capital Improvements Project Legislation threshold of$14;431,OOO as set by Executive Order. The purpose ofthe project is set forth below.

The Council Office Building Renovation project will be in two phases. The:first phase is complete and included the renovation ofthe hearing room, conference room and anteroom on the third floor ofthe Council Office Building (COB). The second phase replaces the HVAC system, the light systems, windows in the rest ofthe COB, upgrades restroom to ADA . standards, and renovates the auditorium on the first floor.

I recommend prompt passage ofthis legislation so as to advance this project.

IL:hpv

Attachments (4)

cc: Jennifer A. Hughes, Director, Office ofManagement and Budget Bonnie Kirkland, Assistant Chief Administrative Officer Glen Orlln, County Council

~ montgomerycountymd.gov/311 ~ 240-773-3556 TTY

@

Page 14: MEMORANDUM - montgomerycountymd.gov€¦ · AGENDA ITEMS 11-14 June 23, 2015 Public Hearing/Action . MEMORANDUM . June 19,2015 . TO: County Council

- I .

Fiscal Impact Statement Council Bill XX-IS Special Capital Improvements Project

Council Office Building Renovations

1. Legislative Summary.

Section §302 of the County Charter and Section §20-1 of the County Code require certain capital improvement projects to be individually authorized by law if the locally-funded

. cost is projected to exceed $14,431,000 in FY16 dollars. The Executive requeSted a bill for one project - Council Office Building Renovations - that now requires Special Capital Improvement Project legislation.

2. An estimate of changes in County revenues and expenditures regardless of whether the revenues or expenditures are assumed in the recommended or approved budget. Includes source of information, assumptions, and. methodologies used.

There are no expenditures or revenues associated with this bill. The bill only authorizes the designation of the Council qffice Building Renovations as a Special Capital Im1?rovement Project.

3. Revenue and expenditure estimates covering at least the next 6 fIScal years.

See item #2 above.

4. An actuarial analysis through the entire amortization period for each bill that would affect retiree pension or group insurance costs,'

Not applicable. There are no personnel costs associated with this bill.

5. Later actions that may affect future revenue and expenditures if the bill authorizes future spending.

Not applicable.

6. An estimate of the staff time needed to implement the bill.

Not applicable. This bill does not affect staff responsibilities.

7. An explanation of how the addition of new staff responsibilities would affect other duties.

Not applicable.

8. An estimate of costs when an additional appropriation is needed.

Not applicable.

@

Page 15: MEMORANDUM - montgomerycountymd.gov€¦ · AGENDA ITEMS 11-14 June 23, 2015 Public Hearing/Action . MEMORANDUM . June 19,2015 . TO: County Council

",, " j

9. A description of any variable that could affect revenue and cost estimates.

Not applicable.

10. Ranges of revenue or expenditures that are uncertain or difficult to project.

Not applicable.,:

11. Ifa bill is likely to have no fiscal impact, why that is the case.

'Ibis bill authorizes the designation of the project as a Special Capital Improvement project. No new appropriation is required.

12. Other fiscal impacts or comments.

None.

13. The following contributed to and concurred with this analysis: (Enter name and department).

Helen P. Vallone, Office ofManagement and Budget

Offic fManagement and Budget

Page 16: MEMORANDUM - montgomerycountymd.gov€¦ · AGENDA ITEMS 11-14 June 23, 2015 Public Hearing/Action . MEMORANDUM . June 19,2015 . TO: County Council

' .. I· •. 1 .. ···1

Economic Impact Statement Council Bill XX-IS, Special Capital Improvements Project

Council Office Building llenovations

Background:

Section §302 of the County Charter and Section §20-1 ofthe County Code require certain capital improvement projects to be individually authorized by law if the locally-funded cost is projected to exceed $14,431,000 in FY16 dollars. The Executive requested a bill for one project - Council Office Building Renovations - that now requires Special Capital Improvement Project legislation.

1. The sources of information, assumptions, and methodologies used.

This bill has no economic'impact, as it serves only to authorize the designation ofthe Council Office Building Renovations as a Special Capital Improvement Project

2. A description of any variable thatcould affect the economic impact estimates.

Not applicable. This bill has no economic impact, as it serves only to authorize the designation ofthe Council Office Building Renovations as a Special Capital Improvement Project.

3. The Bill's positive or negative effect, if any on employment, spending, saving, investment, incomes, and property values in the County.

The bill has no economic impact as it serves only to authorize the designation ofthe Council Office Building Renovations as a Special Capital Improvement Project

4. If a Bill is likely to have no economic impact, why is that the case?

The bill has no economic impact - as it serveS only to authorize the designation ~fthe Council Office Building Renovations as a Special Capital Iniprovement Project

5. The following contributed to and concurred with this analysis: David Platt and Rob Hagedoorn, Finance.

Da~ ,

Page 1 ofl

Page 17: MEMORANDUM - montgomerycountymd.gov€¦ · AGENDA ITEMS 11-14 June 23, 2015 Public Hearing/Action . MEMORANDUM . June 19,2015 . TO: County Council

________ _

Expedited Bill No. 28-15 Concerning: Special Capital

Improvements Project - Snouffer School Road

Revised: May 26.2015 Draft No. L Introduced: June 9.2015 Expires: December 9. 2016 Enacted: Executive: _________ Effective: _________ Sunset Date: -,N-",o=n:.:.e~--=____ Ch. __, Laws of Mont. Co. ___

COUNTY COUNCIL FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND

Lead Sponsor: Council President at the Request of the County Executive

AN EXPEDITED ACT to authorize the planning, design, and construction of the Snouffer School Road, Project No. 501109, in the Montgomery Village/Airpark Policy Area.

By adding to the laws of Montgomery County 2015

Boldface Heading or defined term. Underlinina Added to existing law by original bill. [Single boldface brackets] Deletedfrom existing law by original bill. Double underlinina Added by amendment. [[Double boldface brackets]] Deletedfrom existing law or the bill by amendment. fA­ .. .. Existing law unaffected by bill.

The County Council for Montgomery County, Maryland approves the following Act:

Page 18: MEMORANDUM - montgomerycountymd.gov€¦ · AGENDA ITEMS 11-14 June 23, 2015 Public Hearing/Action . MEMORANDUM . June 19,2015 . TO: County Council

Expedited Bill No. 28-15

Sec. I. The laws of Montgomery County, Maryland, are amended to

2 add the following:

3 Montgomery County, Maryland, is authorized to plan, design, and construct

4 the Snouffer School Road Project No. 501109, in the Montgomery Village/Airpark

5 Policy Area. This authorization includes all necessary planning, design, site

6 improvements, utility, equipment, and structures.

7 Sec. 2. Expedited Effective Date.

8 The Council declares that this legislation is necessary for the immediate

9 protection of the public interest. This Act takes effect on the date on which it

10 becomes law.

11 Approved:

12

13

14

George Leventhal, President, County Council

Approved:

Date

15

16

17

Isiah Leggett, County Executive

This is a correct copy ofCouncil action.

Date

18

Linda M. Lauer, Clerk of the Council Date

2

F:\LAw\BILLS\1526· J529 Special elP Projects\BiIl 28·15 Snouffer School Road.Doc

Page 19: MEMORANDUM - montgomerycountymd.gov€¦ · AGENDA ITEMS 11-14 June 23, 2015 Public Hearing/Action . MEMORANDUM . June 19,2015 . TO: County Council

PROBLEM:

GOALS AND OBJECTIVES:

COORDINATION:

FISCAL IMPACT:

ECONOMIC IMPACT:

EVALUATION:

SOURCE OF INFORMATION:

APPLICATION WITHIN MUNICIPALITIES:

PENALTIES:

LEGISLATIVE REQUEST REPORT

Expedited Bill 28-15 Special Capital Improvements Project - Snouffer School Road

Section §302 of the County Charter and Section §20-1 of the County Code require certain capital improvement projects to be individually authorized by law if the locally-funded cost is projected to exceed $14,431,000 in FY16 dollars. The estimated locally-funded cost of this project in the FY16 Capital Budget and FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program is $18,171,000 for planning, design, land, site improvement and utilities, and construction costs.

This project provides for the design, land acquisition, and construction of 5,850 linear feet of roadway widening along Snouffer School Road between Sweet Autumn Drive and Centerway Road. The roadway's typical section consists of two through lanes in each direction, a continuous center turn lane and 5.5-foot bike lanes in each direction with an eight-foot shared use path on the north side and a five-foot sidewalk on the south side within a 90' right-of-way.

This project has been coordinated with the Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission, Department of Permitting Services, Pepco, Verizon. Washington Gas. and Department of General Services.

Not Applicable.

The Montgomery Village/Airpark Policy Area of the County is experiencing rapid growth with plans for new offices, shops, residential communities, and restaurants. The Snouffer School Road improvements project is needed to meet traffic and pedestrian demands of existing and future land uses. This project meets the recommendations of the area master plans, enhances regional connectivity. and follows the continuity of adjacent developer improvements. It will improve traffic flow by providing continuous roadway cross section and standard lane widths and encourage alternative means of mobility through proposed bicycle and pedestrian facilities. The Department of Transportation (DOT) completed Facility Planning - Phase I study in FY06.

Capital projects are evaluated biennially by the County Executive and County Council as part of the Capital Improvements Program review.

Department ofTransportation.

Not Applicable.

None Required.

F:\LAW\BILLS\1526-1529 Special CIP Projects\LRR For Bill 28-15.Dot

Page 20: MEMORANDUM - montgomerycountymd.gov€¦ · AGENDA ITEMS 11-14 June 23, 2015 Public Hearing/Action . MEMORANDUM . June 19,2015 . TO: County Council

, '·1~ .. :. I , .. , .. i . . . I

O~CEOFTHECOUNTYEXECUTIVE ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND 20850

Isiab Leggett County Executive

MEMORANDUM

May 19,2015

. TO: George Leventhal, President, County co;~

FROM: IsiahLeggett, CoIDlly Ex~~---SUBJECT: Special Capital Improvements Project Legislation .

Snouffer School Road (P501109)

In accordance with Section 302 ofthe County Charter and Section 20M1 of the Montgomery County Code, I am forwarding the attached Special Capital Improvements Project Legislation Authorization and Legislative Request Report for Snouffer School Road (p501109).

This request is necessary because the local cost ofthe above project exceeds the FY16 Special Capital Improvements Project Legislation threshold of$14,431 ,000 as set by Executive Order. The pwpose ofthe project is set forth below.

The Snouffer School Road project provides for the design, land acquisition, and construction of 5,850 linear feet of roadway widening along Snouffer School Road between Sweet Autumn Drive and Centerway Road. The roadway's typical section consists oftwo through lanes in each direction, a continuous center tmn lane and 55-foot bike lanes in each direction with an eight-foot shared use path on the north side and a five-foot sidewalk on the south side within a 90' right-of-way.

I recommend prompt passage of this legislation so as to advance this project.

IL:hpv

Attachments (4)

cc: Bonnie Kirkland, Assistant Chief Administrative Officer Jennifer A. Hughes, Director, Office ofManagement and Budget Alicia Thomas, Department of Transportation

'~' ..•.:.~."

3' montgOmerycountymd.gov/311 '. 240-773-3556 TTY•

i

Page 21: MEMORANDUM - montgomerycountymd.gov€¦ · AGENDA ITEMS 11-14 June 23, 2015 Public Hearing/Action . MEMORANDUM . June 19,2015 . TO: County Council

.1

Fiscal Impact Statement Conncll Bill XX-15 Special Capital Improvements Project

Snouffer School Road

1. Legislative Summary.

Section §302 of the County Charter and Section §20-1 ofthe C;0unty Code require certain capital improvement projects to be individually authorized by law if the locally-funded cost is projected to exceed $14,431,000 in FY16 dollars. The Executive requested a bill for one project - Snouffer School Road - that now requires Special Capital Improvement Project legislation.

2. An estimate of changes in County revenues and expenditures regardless ofwhether the revenues or expenditures are assumed in the recommended or approved budget. Includes source of information, assumptions, and methodologies used.

There are no expenditures or revenues associated with this bill. The bill only authorizes the designation of the Snouffer School Road as a Special Capital Improvement Project.

3. Revenue and expenditure estimates covering at least the next 6 fIScal years.

See item #2 above.

4. An actuarial'analysis through the entire amortization period for each bill that'would affect retiree pension or group insurance costs. .

Not applicable. There are no personnel costs associated with this bill.

5. Later actions that may affect future revenue and expenditures if the bilJ authorizes future spending.

Not applicable.

6. An estimate of the staff time needed to implement the bill.

Not applicable. This bill does not affect staff responsibilities.

7. An explanation of how the addition of new staff responsibilities would affect other duties.

Not applicable.

8. An estimate of costs when an additional appropriation is needed.

Not applicable.

Page 22: MEMORANDUM - montgomerycountymd.gov€¦ · AGENDA ITEMS 11-14 June 23, 2015 Public Hearing/Action . MEMORANDUM . June 19,2015 . TO: County Council

.. i I

9. A description of any variable that could affect revenue and cost estimates.

Not applicable.

10. Ranges of revenue or expenditures that are uncertain or difficult to project.

Not applicable.

11. H a bill is likely to have no fiscal impact, why that is the case.

This bill authorizes the designation of the project as a Special Capital Improvement project. No new appropriation is required.

12. Other fiscal impacts or comments.

None.

13.The following contributed to and concurred with this analysis: (Enter name and department).

Helen P. Vallone, Office ofManagement and Budget.

Date

Page 23: MEMORANDUM - montgomerycountymd.gov€¦ · AGENDA ITEMS 11-14 June 23, 2015 Public Hearing/Action . MEMORANDUM . June 19,2015 . TO: County Council

I :.

Economic Impact Statement Council BiU XX-1S, Special Capital Improvements Project

Snouffer School Road

Background:

Section §302 of the County Charter and Section §20-1 of the County Code require certain capital improvement projects to be individually authorized by law if the locally-funded cost is projected to exceed $14,431,000 in FY16 dollars. The Executive requested a bill for one project - Snouffer School Road - that now requires Special Capital Improvement Project legislation.

1. The sources of information, assumptions, and methodologies used.

'This bill has no economic impact, as it serves only to authorize the designation of the Snouffer School Road as a Special Capital Improvement Project.

2•. A description of any variable that could affect the economic impact estimates.

Not applicable. 'This bill has no economic impact, as it serves only to authorize the . designation ofthe Snouffer School Road as a Speciai Capital Improvement Project.

3. The Bill's positive or negative effect, ifany on employment, spending, saving, investment, incomes, and property values in the County.

The bill has no economic impact - as it serves only to authorize the designation ofthe Snouffer School Road as a Special Capital Improvement Project.

4. If a BiU is likely to have no economic impact, why is that the case?

The bill has no economi~ impact - as it serves only to authorize the designation ofthe Snouffer School Road as a Special Capital Improvement Project.

S. The following contributed to and concurred with this analysis: David Platt and Rob Hagedoorn, Finance .

epartment ofFinance

.... Datt I

Page 1 ofl

Page 24: MEMORANDUM - montgomerycountymd.gov€¦ · AGENDA ITEMS 11-14 June 23, 2015 Public Hearing/Action . MEMORANDUM . June 19,2015 . TO: County Council

Expedited Bill No. 29-15 Concerning: Special Capital

Improvements Project Metropolitan Branch Trail

Revised: May 26, 2015 Draft No. L Introduced: June 9, 2015 Expires: December 9.2016 Enacted: __________ Executive: _________ Effective: __________ Sunset Date: -!N~o~n~e______ Ch. __, Laws of Mont. Co. ___

COUNTY COUNCIL FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND

Lead Sponsor: Council President at the Request of the County Executive

AN EXPEDITED ACT to authorize the planning, design, and construction of the Metropolitan Branch Trail, Project No. 501110, in the Silver Spring CBD Policy Area.'

By adding to the laws ofMontgomery County 2015

Boldface Heading or defined term. Underlinina Added to existing law by original bill. [Single boldface brackets] Deletedfrom existing law by original bill. Double ullucili. ina Added by amendment. [[Double boldface brackets]] Deletedfrom existing law or the bill by amendment. #t * * Existing law unaffected by bill.

The County Council for Montgomery County, Maryland approves the following Act:

Page 25: MEMORANDUM - montgomerycountymd.gov€¦ · AGENDA ITEMS 11-14 June 23, 2015 Public Hearing/Action . MEMORANDUM . June 19,2015 . TO: County Council

Expedited Bill No. 29-15

Sec. 1. The laws of Montgomery County, Maryland, are amended to

2 add the following:

3 Montgomery County, Maryland, is authorized to plan, design, and construct

4 the Metropolitan Branch Trail Project No. 501110, in the Silver Spring CBD

5 Policy Area. This authorization includes all necessary planning, design, site

6 improvements, equipment, and structures.

7 Sec. 2. Expedited Effective Date.

8 The Council declares that this legislation is necessary for the immediate

9 protection of the public interest. This Act takes effect on the date on which it

10 becomes law.

II Approved:

12

13

14

George Leventhal, President, County Council

Approved:

Date

15

16

17

Isiah Leggett, County Executive

This is a correct copy ofCouncil action.

Date

18

Linda M. Lauer, Clerk of the Council Date

2

F:\LAW\BILLS\IS26-1S29 Special elP Projects\BiII29-1S Metropolitan Branch Trail.Doc

Page 26: MEMORANDUM - montgomerycountymd.gov€¦ · AGENDA ITEMS 11-14 June 23, 2015 Public Hearing/Action . MEMORANDUM . June 19,2015 . TO: County Council

DESCRIPTION:

PROBLEM:

GOALS AND OBJECTIVES:

COORDINATION:

FISCAL IMPACT:

ECONOMIC IMPACT:

EVALUATION:

EXPERIENCE ELSEWHERE:

SOURCE OF INFORMATION:

LEGISLATIVE REQUEST REPORT

Expedited Bill 29-15 Special Capital Improvements Project Metropolitan Branch Trail

The County Executive requests that capital project No. 50 III 0, Metropolitan Branch Trail be authorized as a "Special Capital Improvements Project" pursuant to Section §302 of the County Charter and Section §20-1 of the Montgomery County Code.

Section §302 of the County Charter and Section §20-1 of the County Code require certain capital improvement projects to be individually authorized by law if the locally-funded cost is projected to exceed $14,431,000 in FY16 dollars. The estimated locally-funded cost of this project in the FY16 Capital Budget and FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program is $18,293,000 for planning, design, land, site improvement and utilities, and construction costs.

This project provides for the planning, design, and construction of the Metropolitan Branch Trail. This trail will be part of a larger system of trails to enable non-motorized travel around the Washington region.

This project has been coordinated with the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, CSX-Transportation, Maryland State Highway Administration, Montgomery College, Maryland Historical Trust, Purple Line project, Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission, and Montgomery County Department of Health and Human Services.

Not Applicable.

The Metropolitan Branch Trail is to be part of a larger system of trails to enable non-motorized travel around the Washington region. The overall goal for these trails is to create a bicycle beltway that links Union Station and the Mall in Washington, D.C. to Takoma Park, Silver Spring, and Bethesda in Maryland. The trail will serve pedestrians, bicyclists, joggers, and skaters, and will be Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) accessible.

Capital projects are evaluated biennially by the County Executive and County Council as part ofthe Capital Improvements Program review.

Not Applicable.

Department of Transportation.

Page 27: MEMORANDUM - montgomerycountymd.gov€¦ · AGENDA ITEMS 11-14 June 23, 2015 Public Hearing/Action . MEMORANDUM . June 19,2015 . TO: County Council

APPLICATION WITHIN MUNICIPALITIES: Not Applicable.

PENALTIES: None Required.

F:\LAw\BILLS\1526-1529 Special elP Projects\LRR For Bill 29-15.Oot

Page 28: MEMORANDUM - montgomerycountymd.gov€¦ · AGENDA ITEMS 11-14 June 23, 2015 Public Hearing/Action . MEMORANDUM . June 19,2015 . TO: County Council

1 • >, " ".-1 ','," '''' ,', ,," :, 1 ':';' , , :'1

i i 1OFFICE OF THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE

ROCKV][LE. MARYLAND 20850

Isiah Leggett County Executive

MEMORANDUM

May 19,2015

TO: George Leventhal, President, County CO;cil~

FROM: IsiahLeggett, County Executive --f~­SUBJECT: Special Capital Improvements Project Legis(ion . .......,

Metropolitan Branch Trail (p5011l0)

In accordance with Section 302 of the County Charter and Section 20-1 ofthe Montgomery County Code, I am forwarding the attached Special Capital Improvements Project Legislation Authorization and Legislative Request Report for Metropolitan Branch Trail (p501110).

This request is necessary because the local cost ofthe above project now exceeds the FY16 Special Capital Improvements Project Legislation threshold of$14,431,OOO as set by Executive Order. The purpose ofthe project is set forth below.

The Metropolitan Branch Trail project provides funding for the planning, design and construction oftbe 0.62 mile segment ofthis trail in Montgomery County between the end of the existing trail in Takoma Park and the Silver Spring Transit Center.

I recommend prompt passage ofthis legislation so as to advance this project.

IL:hpv

Attachments (4)

cc: Bonnie Kirkland, Assistant Chief Administrative Officer Jennifer A. Hughes, Director, Office ofManagement and Budget Alicia Thomas, Department of Transportation

"':;•,,3< montgomerycountymd.gov/311 :' >' 240-773-3556 TTY

2.1

Page 29: MEMORANDUM - montgomerycountymd.gov€¦ · AGENDA ITEMS 11-14 June 23, 2015 Public Hearing/Action . MEMORANDUM . June 19,2015 . TO: County Council

... _.• :."J I ' .',,·.1

Fiscal Impact Statement Council Bill XX-IS Spei:ial Capital Improvements Project

Metropolitan Branch Trail

1. Legislative Summary.

Section §302 of the County Charter and Section §20-1 of the County Code require certain capital improvement projects to be individually authorized by law if the locally-funded cost is projected to exceed $14,431,000 in' FY16 dollars. The Executive requested a bill for one project - Metropolitan Branch Trail - that now requires Special Capital Improvement Project legislation.

2. An estimate of changes in County revenues and expenditures regardless ofwhether the revenues or expenditures are assumed in the recommended or approved budget. Includes source of information, assumptions, and methodologies used.

There are no expenditures or revenues associated with this bill. The bill only authorizes the designation of the Metropolitan Branch Trail as a Special Capital Improvement Project.

3. Revenue and expenditure estimates covering at least the next 6 fIScal years.

See item #2 above.

4. An actuarial analysis through the entire amortization period for each bill thatwould affect retiree pension or group insurance costs.

Not applicable. There are no personnel costs associated with this bill.

S. Later actions that may affect future revenue and expenditures if the bill authorizes future spending.

Not applicable.

6. An estimate 'of the staff time needed to implement the bill.

Not applicable. This bill does not affect staff responsibilities.

7. An explanation of how the addition of new staff responsibilities would affect other duties.

Not applicable.

8. An estimate of costs when an additional appropriation is needed.

Not applicable.

Page 30: MEMORANDUM - montgomerycountymd.gov€¦ · AGENDA ITEMS 11-14 June 23, 2015 Public Hearing/Action . MEMORANDUM . June 19,2015 . TO: County Council

; .

9. A description of any variable that could affect revenue and cost estimates.

Not applicable.

10. Ranges of revenue or expenditures that are uncertain or difficult to project.

Not applicable.

11. If a bill is likely to have no fiscal impact, why that is the case.

This bill authorizes the designation of the project as a Special Capital Improvement project. No new appropriation is required.

1~. Oth~r fiscal impacts or comments.

None.

13. The following contributed to and concurred with this analysis: (Enter name and department). ·

Helen P. Vallone, Office ofManagement and Budget.

@

Page 31: MEMORANDUM - montgomerycountymd.gov€¦ · AGENDA ITEMS 11-14 June 23, 2015 Public Hearing/Action . MEMORANDUM . June 19,2015 . TO: County Council

'. .~

Economic Impact Statement CouncD Bill XX-IS, Special Capital Improvements Project

Metropolitan Branch Trail

Background:

Section §302 ofthe County Charter and Section §20-1 ofthe County Code require certain capital improvement projects to be individually authorized by law ifthe locally-funded cost is projected to exceed $14,431,000 in FYl6 dollars. The Executive requested a bill for one project - Metropolitan Branch Trail - that now requires Special Capital Improvement Project legislation.

1. The sources of information, assumptions, and methodologies used..

This bill has no economic impact, as it serves only to authorize the designation ofthe Metropolitan Branch Trail as a Special Capital Improvement Project

2. A description of any variable that could affect the economic impact estimates.

Not applicable. This bill has no economic impact, as it serves only to authorize the ! ! i

designation ofthe Metropolitan Branch Trail as a Special Capital Improvement Project.

3. The BUl's positive or negative effect, ifany on employment, spending, saving, investment, incomes, and property values in the County.

The bill has nn economic impact - as it serves only to authorize the designation ofthe Metropolitan Branch Trail as a Special Capital Improvement Project

4. Ifa BUl is likely to have no economic impact, why is that the case?

The bill has no economic impact - as it serves only to authorize the designation ofthe Metropolitan Branch Trail as a Special Capital Improvement Project.

S. The following contributed to and concurred with this analysis: David Platt and Rob Hagedoom, Finance. .

Thtte' LL ;1­

Page lofl