Memorable Experiences in Architecture: Griselda...

61
1 Memorable Experiences in Architecture: Understanding how buildings affect people emotionally... Griselda Arteaga Trejo MA/ad Master (MA) in Architectural Design The University of Sheffield School of Architecture September 2011

Transcript of Memorable Experiences in Architecture: Griselda...

1

Memorable Experiences in Architecture:

Understanding how buildings affect people emotionally...

Griselda Arteaga Trejo

MA/ad

Master (MA) in Architectural Design

The University of Sheffield

School of Architecture

September 2011

2

Abstract

“It’s not enough just to see architecture; you must experience it. You must

observe how it was designed for a special purpose and how it was attuned to

the entire concept and rhythm of a specific era. You must dwell in the rooms,

feel how they close about you, observe how you are naturally led from one to

the other. You must be aware of the textural effects, discover why those colors

were used, how the choice depended on the orientation of the rooms in

relation to windows and the sun.”

Experiencing architecture (Rasmusen, 1989, p. 33)

The fast pacing world in which people are living, has changed the ways in which architects

design and build; the development of construction techniques and new materials has left

architecture without materiality, which translates in a lack of sensory experiences; the senses,

other than sight, have been neglected.

Architecture built nowadays is more concerned with the looks of a building, its shape and

form, more so than with the experience within it; it is almost becoming more sculptural, than

inhabitable; it is not inviting, it is alienating. The power of the senses in engaging a person in

the experience of space is put aside, and without it, architecture becomes dull and devoid

of meaning.

This thesis tries to understand how buildings transmit emotion, embody meaning and provide

people with a sense of belonging, a sense of place; in doing so, further developed

architectural projects will provide visitors with a much richer and memorable experience, by

applying the findings of this research project.

In order to achieve this, research through the design of an architectural project developed

during the academic year 2010-2011, is carried along with an actual sensory experience of a

place, as the only way to understand how buildings affect people, is to experience them first

hand. Now, because the project is fictional, experiencing it is not possible; nonetheless, the

sensory experience of any place is helpful in terms of understanding how they affect visitors.

The information obtained from the research by design, and the sensory experience exercise,

will not only answer the research question, but many other questions, ranging from the

definition of architecture to ways in which architecture becomes memorable; by the end, it

will point architects in the right direction to develop projects which will be more inhabitable

than sculptural, more inviting than alienating, and not dull and devoid or meaning, but

memorable and meaningful.

3

Aknowledgements

“Through the days ahead I'll think of days before,

You made me hope for something better

And made me reach for something more...”

Diane Warren

First I would like to thank two of my tutors, Stephen Walker and Carolyn Butterworth, for

making sense of the thoughts I occasionally shared with them, for their patience and

encouragement throughout the development of the studio project and this thesis.

I would also like to thank my good friend and colleague, Christian García Arreguín, for being

“my other supervisor” and for letting me borrow her own supervisor, Lucy Cartlidge, whom I

also thank for providing guidance in moments of need, when she did not have to. It was

much appreciated.

The University of Sheffield and CONACYT, for putting your confidence in me, for accepting

me and sponsoring me; for helping me achieve this dream.

My friends, who shared their experience as victims of the inundation in Veracruz, caused by

Hurricane Karl, in September of 2010; and everyone else who shared their images and videos

of the disaster. Without your support, the studio project, and therefore this thesis, would not

have been possible. Also those few friends who hesitantly gave me their definition of

architecture and let me use their pictures in this thesis. Thank you as well.

The people in the architecture studio who took the time to get to know me, who repeated

themselves more than once when I would not understand their lovely accents, who

explained things to me in more than one occasion and who made me feel as part of their

group, even though I did not belong there. You were my teachers and my friends.

Everyone in Sheffield who made this place warmer despite of the temperature, who were

there for me and shared their knowledge, architectural or not. You made this place home.

My friends back home and all around the world, who were with me since day one and have

never left me alone; who had more confidence in me than I did in myself, who paid for my

coffees when I was broke from applying everywhere and who told me to never give up. You

got me here.

A mi familia, pero en especial a mis padres, Jorge Luis Arteaga Beauregard y Griselda Trejo

Martínez, quienes nunca dudaron de mi, ni dejaron de apoyarme a través del largo camino

que ha sido llegar hasta el día de hoy; quienes no me preguntaban por la escuela y mi tesis

porque yo les pedía que no lo hicieran; quienes me obligaron a ir a clases de inglés los

sábados por la mañana aún cuando yo lo odiaba, y me prometieron que algún día valdría

la pena. Gracias por cumplir esa promesa.

Finalmente, a esa persona especial; sin su ayuda, apoyo y amor incondicional, esta tesis y

este sueño no habrían sido posibles. Gracias por demostrarme que los sueños se hacen

realidad.

Sinceramente,

Griselda Arteaga Trejo

4

“All our dreams can come true,

If we have the courage to pursue them.”

Walt Disney

For all those who are still in the pursuit of their dreams. Never stop believing.

5

Table of contents

Definitions: A Personal Exercise…………………………………………………………………….9

Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………….12

Aims and Objectives……………………………………………………………………...13

Literary Review………………………………………………………………………………………14

The body and the senses………………………………………………………………..14

The auditory system/sense of hearing……………………………………….16

The taste-smell system/sense of taste-smell………………………………..18

The haptic system/sense of touch……………………………………………20

The visual system/sense of sight………………………………………………22

Sense of place…………………………………………………………………………….24

Memory……………………………………………………………………………………..27

Research Strategy…………………………………………………………………………….…….28

Methodology…………………………………………………………………………………….…..30

Location and site………………………………………………………………………….30

Masterplan…………………………………………………………………………….……31

Museum………………………………………………………………………………….….33

The Experience…………………………………………………………………………….38

Plans………………………………………………………………………………………….41

Section………………………………………………………………………………………45

Discussion and Analysis…………………………………………………………………………….46

Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………………………48

Appendixes..…………………………………………………………………………………………49

Isolating The Senses: Another Personal Experience………………………………...49

Chronicles Of An Unannounced Flood Part 1……………………………………….54

Chronicles Of An Unannounced Flood Part 2……………………………………….57

Chronicles Of An Unannounced Flood Part 3……………………………………….58

Bibliography…………………………………………………………………………………………60

6

List of figures

Figure 1. Subject interviewed: Sun Zavala……….………………………………………………………..9

Figure 2. Subject interviewed: Ricardo Silva…….………………………………………………………..9

Figure 3. Subject interviewed: María Rosa Valle.....……………………………………………………..9

Figure 4. Subject interviewed: César González...………………………………………………………..9

Figure 5. Subject interviewed: Eloy Cue………....………………………………………………………10

Figure 6. Subject interviewed: Antonio Manzano…...…………………………………………………10

Figure 7. Subject interviewed: Adolfo Lara……...………………………………………………………10

Figure 8. Subject interviewed: José Roberto Lagunes...………………………………………………10

Figure 9. Architect Maya Lin…………………….....………………………………………………………10

Figure 10. Architect Mies van der Rohe…………….....…………………………………………………10

Figure 11. Architect Michael Graves……………......……………………………………………………10

Figure 12. Architect Zaha Hadid……………………………..……………………………………………10

Figure 13. Architect John Ruskin…………………...………………………………………………………10

Figure 14. Architect Frank Gehry……………….....………………………………………………………10

Figure 15. Architect Le Corbusier………………......…………………………………………………..…10

Figure 16. Architect Luis Barragán………………...………………………………………………………10

Figure 17. The Vitruvian Man……………………………………………………………………………….14

Figure 18. Sense of sight………………………………………………………….…………………………14

Figure 19. Sense of hearing………………………………………………………...……………………….14

Figure 20. Sense of taste…………………………………………………………………………………….14

Figure 21. Sense of smell…………………………………………………………………………………….14

Figure 22. Sense of touch…………………………………………………………………………..……….14

Figure 23. Jewish Museum: contemplating the void…………………………………………………..17

Figure 24. Jewish Museum: the falle leaves installation……………………………………………….17

Figure 25. Jewish Museum: making sounds……………………………………………………………...17

Figure 26. Jewish Museum: reflecting on the experience…………………………………………....17

Figure 27. Guinness Storehouse: exhibition of barley………………………………………………….18

Figure 28. Guinness Storehouse: exhibition of hops……………………………………………………18

Figure 29. Guinness Storehouse: how smell and taste are stimulated……………………………..18

Figure 30. Guinness Storehouse: pint of Guinness……………………………………………………...18

Figure 31. A&F signature fragrance……………………………………………………………………….19

Figure 32. A&F waiting line………………………………………………………………………………….19

Figure 33. A&F signature greeters at the gate………………………………………………………….19

Figure 34. A&F sign…………………………………………………………………………………………...19

Figure 35. Center for the Sightless and Visually Impaired: sketch…………………………………..21

Figure 36. Center for the Sightless and Visually Impaired: different materials……………………21

7

Figure 37. Center for the Sightless and Visually Impaired: different textures……………………..21

Figure 38. Center for the Sightless and Visually Impaired: tactile cues……………………………21

Figure 39. Eco Pavilion: posible arrangement of blocks.................................................................21

Figure 40. Eco Pavilion: another arrangement of blocks...............................................................21

Figure 41. Eco Pavilion: Frida Escobedo at an event.....................................................................21

Figure 42. Eco Pavilion: visitors experiencing space.......................................................................21

Figure 43. Blur Building……………………………………………………………………………………….22

Figure 44. Blur Building: structure…………………………………………………………………………..22

Figure 45. Blur Building: interior space…………………………………………………………………….22

Figure 46. Blur Building: blurred vision inside……………………………………………………………..22

Figure 47. Casa Luis Barragán: geometry………………………………………………………………..23

Figure 48. Casa Luis Barragán: color……………………………………………………………………...23

Figure 49. Casa Luis Barragán: nature……………………………………………………………………23

Figure 50. Casa Luis Barragán: light……………………………………………………………………….23

Figure 51. La Villa: illustration of the aparision of our Lady of Guadalupe...................................25

Figure 52. La Villa: the old Basilica....................................................................................................25

Figure 53. La Villa: the new Basilica..................................................................................................25

Figure 54. La Villa: Juan Diego‟s original tilma in the new Basilica…………………………....……25

Figure 55. La Villa: panoramic view of the Plaza Mariana………………………………….…...…...25

Figure 56. México in North América..................................................................................................30

Figure 57. Veracruz in México……………………………………………………………….…………...30

Figure 58. Veracruz in Veracruz…………………………………………………………….……………30

Figure 59. Aerial view of Veracruz and the site...............................................................................30

Figure 60. Aerial view of the flooded site.........................................................................................30

Figure 61. Floresta flood: water levels inside the neighbourhood.................................................31

Figure 62. Floresta flood: the market in the neighbourhood.........................................................31

Figure 63. Floresta flood: cars and homes underwater..................................................................31

Figure 64. Floresta flood: people trapped on the roofs.................................................................31

Figure 65. Floresta flood: the church in the neighbourhood.........................................................31

Figure 66. Floresta flood: rescue boats from the federal army......................................................31

Figure 67. Floresta flood: lost neighbourhood in the body of water.............................................31

Figure 68. Floresta flood: the interior of a flooded home...............................................................31

Figure 69. Site plan: zoning by north, south, east and west avenues...........................................32

Figure 70. Site plan: zoning by the main routes...............................................................................32

Figure 71. Site plan: zoning by accesses to the site........................................................................32

Figure 72. Site plan: zoning by combining all routes.......................................................................32

Figure 73. Site plan: environmental study........................................................................................33

Figure 74. Site plan: final zoning........................................................................................................33

8

Figure 75. Site study model: on a daily basis...................................................................................33

Figure 76. Site study model: during a normal flood........................................................................33

Figure 77. Site study model: during a big flood...............................................................................33

Figure 78. Museum study model 1.....................................................................................................33

Figure 79. Museum study model 2.....................................................................................................33

Figure 80. Museum study model 3.....................................................................................................33

Figure 81. Museum study model 4, to be developed.....................................................................33

Figure 82. Museum conceptual sketches........................................................................................34

Figure 83. Developed museum study model...................................................................................34

Figure 84. Developed museum study model...................................................................................34

Figure 85. Developed museum study model...................................................................................34

Figure 86. Brainstorming notes...........................................................................................................34

Figure 87. Schematic diagram of circulation of the experience route.......................................35

Figure 88. Schematic diagram of circulation of the museum.......................................................35

Figure 89. Site plan: zoning by north, south, east and west avenues...........................................36

Figure 90. Site zoning/circulation study model................................................................................36

Figure 91. Museum circulation study model....................................................................................36

Figure 92. Conceptual sketch of the route and experience spaces...........................................36

Figure 93. Conceptual sketch of the experience spaces..............................................................36

Figure 94. Schematic location of the experience spaces on site.................................................36

Figure 95. Experience space 1..........................................................................................................37

Figure 96. Experience space 2..........................................................................................................37

Figure 97. Experience space 3..........................................................................................................37

Figure 98. Experience space 4..........................................................................................................37

Figure 99. Museum interior 1..............................................................................................................37

Figure 100. Museum interior 2............................................................................................................37

Figure 101. Museum interior 3............................................................................................................37

Figure 102. Museum interior 4............................................................................................................37

Figure 103. Plan: level 0......................................................................................................................41

Figure 104. Plan: level -2.....................................................................................................................42

Figure 105. Plan: level -1.....................................................................................................................43

Figure 106. Plan: level 1......................................................................................................................44

Figure 107. Section through the “experience route”......................................................................45

9

Definitions, A Personal Exercise

“It is impossible to explain precisely what architecture is, its limits are by no

means well defined. Art should not be explained, it must be experienced.”

Experiencing Architecture (Bloomer and Moore, 1989, p. 3)

When I started studying architecture a long time ago, one of the first things my professors

asked me, beside „why I wanted to study architecture‟, was „what was architecture to me‟.

Back then I had a hard time trying to answer those questions; I probably answered the way

any other person who had not studied architecture would have, because back then, I did

not know any better. But the thing is, even to this day, after four and half years of studying it

at University, a year and half of working in practice, and almost one year of doing a master

degree in architectural design, I am still finding ways to describe architecture I had never

thought of before.

It must be said that it is not the purpose of this thesis to explain what architecture is exactly,

after all, architecture can be many things; it is a very subjective topic, a very hard word to

define. Is it an art? Is it a science? Is it the mere act of building? Can it even be defined?

If one looks up the word in a dictionary, the answer will be something simple for people to

understand, and possibly the way common people, non architects, perceive architecture,

something like: “The art or practice of designing and constructing buildings.” But it is fair to

say that for architects, architecture is so much more than that.

To prove this point, I asked a few people the very same question my professors asked me so

many years ago: „what is architecture to you?‟

Fig. 1-4. Professionals in something other than architecture who were asked “What is architecture to you?”; Sources: Sun Zavala,

Ricardo Silva, Maria Rosa Valle, César González; all photos edited by Griselda Arteaga Trejo on www.picnik.com, August 2011.

“Something aesthetic in terms of proportions and design.” ~ Sun. Accountant

“The design of a structure or building to be materialized.“ ~ Richie. Businessman

“Is in charge of the design of constructions.” ~ Maria. Business Administrator

“Is the science that aims to create beautiful and aesthetic projects.” ~ César. Industrial

engineer.

I was not very surprised with these answers; after all, these people were not educated in a

school of architecture. They mostly related architecture with the design of beautiful buildings.

In contrast, I thought I could try and get a more appropriate definition from people within the

field, so I got in touch with friends from when I was studying architecture, and asked them the

same question. Their answers, to my relief, were without a doubt what I was expecting:

10

Fig. 5-8. Professionals in architecture who were asked “What is architecture to you?”; Sources: Eloy Cue, Antonio Manzano, Adolfo

Lara, Jose Roberto Lagunes; all photos edited by Griselda Arteaga Trejo on www.picnik.com, August 2011.

“It’s a whole that influences directly in its users, it satisfies their needs, it’s the formation and

deformation of space as an expression of ideas aiming for functionality and aesthetic.” ~

Eloy. Architect

“Is the space resulting from the projection of a compound of dimensions that attest the basic

needs of its user, aiming that the elements that intervene in the design of the space are

adapted to the context resulting in a positive and comfortable environment.” ~ Tony.

Architect

“Is the combination of art and technique to create inhabitable spaces to serve a specific

purpose within the needs of society.” ~ Adolfo. Architect

“Is the art of creating or designing spaces that respond to the needs of society.” ~ Jose.

Architecture student.

Architects understand that architecture is about creating functional and beautiful spaces,

but most importantly, they understand that architecture is for its users, for people. Now,

although these answers seem much more accurate and closer to the definition I was aiming

for, I still felt like there were some things missing; so I could only do one more thing and go to

the “experts”:

Fig. 9-16. Architecture Legends whose definitions of architecture I found; Sources: Maya Lin at

http://prelectur.stanford.edu/lecturers/lin/; Mies van del Rohe at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Ludwig_Mies_van_der_Rohe.jpg;

Michael Graves at http://www.microwavecookingforone.com/MichaelGraves/; Zaha Hadid at

http://nocountryforyoungwomen.com/?p=1742; John Ruskin at http://www.thefamouspeople.com/profiles/john-ruskin-2.php; Frank

11

Gehry at http://www.egodesign.ca/en/article.php?article_id=43; Le Corbusier at http://www.editionedartmag.com/artist-bios/le-

corbusier; and Luis Barragán at http://darthblender.com/design/biographies/luis-barragan1902-1988/; all photos edited by Griselda

Arteaga Trejo on www.picnik.com, August 2011.

“Architecture is like a mythical fantastic. It has to be experienced. It can't be described. We

can draw it up and we can make models of it, but it can only be experienced as a

complete whole.” ~ Maya Lin (taken from http://www.dumb.com/quotes/architecture-quotes/; July 2011)

“Architecture is the will of an epoch translated into space.” ~ Mies van der Rohe (taken from

http://thinkexist.com/quotes/ludwig_mies_van_der_rohe/, July 2011)

“Architecture is not all about the design of the building and nothing else, it is also about the

cultural setting and the ambience, the whole affair.” ~ Michael Graves (taken from

http://www.saidwhat.co.uk/keywordquotes/architecture; July 2011)

“Architecture is really about well-being. I think that people want to feel good in a space...

On the one hand it’s about shelter, but it’s also about pleasure.” ~ Zaha Hadid (taken from

http://www.designfeast.com/thoughts/index.htm; July 2011)

“Architecture is the art which so disposes and adorns the edifices raised by man, that the

sight of them may contribute to his mental health, power, and pleasure.” ~ John Ruskin (taken

from http://www.dumb.com/quotes/architecture-quotes/3/; July 2011)

“Architecture is a small piece of this human equation, but for those of us who practice it, we

believe in its potential to make a difference, to enlighten and to enrich the human

experience, to penetrate the barriers of misunderstanding and provide a beautiful context

for life's drama.” ~ Frank Gehry (taken from http://www.artquotes.net/masters/frank-gehry/index.htm; July 2011)

“Architecture is the learned game, correct and magnificent, of forms assembled in the light.”

~ Le Corbusier (taken from http://thinkexist.com/quotes/le_corbusier/; July 2011)

“Architecture is art when one consciously or unconsciously creates aesthetic emotion in the

atmosphere and when this environment produces well being.” ~ Luis Barragán (taken from

http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/l/luis_barragan.html; July 2011)

These people knew what they were talking about; and so, by the fusion of all the definitions

acquired I can construct a more acceptable definition of architecture:

“Architecture is about designing beautiful and functional spaces for people... but to be

understood, architecture needs to be experienced, to work in the context where it is

conceived, to incorporate the local popular culture, to manipulate and take advantage of

the elements, both natural and architectural, to its favour, and most importantly, it needs to

be able to transmit emotion and be life enhancing”.

Now all these considerations may seem quite obvious, for architects anyway, but the truth is

that fulfilling all of these requirements in a project is harder than one might think, and in this

difficulty lies the problem with architecture nowadays, which is the base to the

understanding of the development of this thesis.

12

Introduction

“I had become increasingly concerned about the bias towards vision, and the

suppression of other senses, in the way architecture was conceived, taught

and critiqued, and about the consequent disappearance of sensory and

sensual qualities from the arts and architecture.”

The Eyes of the Skin (Pallasmaa, 2005, p. 10)

The reason why architecture is perceived as “beautiful buildings” and nothing else by most

people, is because it has been stereotyped as one of the fine arts, the arts concerned with

the “beautiful”, which is a quality perceived merely by the sense of sight; architecture is

essentially visual, an art to be seen, and if people are able to experience it from the inside, if

they move within the spaces that constitute it, the experience remains essentially a

spectacle of vision. Even books and architectural magazines are filled with drawings and

photos and the other senses are given less importance.

Truth of the matter is, architects are deeply preoccupied with vision, which is only natural as

humans are visual beings, living in a visual world. The perceptions of it, the information

absorbed and the signals sent, are overwhelmingly visual in nature. People think and dream

in pictures and even when they read, they transform the words into mental pictures.

In this thesis, the reasons behind the importance given to the eyes and the negligence of the

body and the other senses are not to be discussed, but rather what this situation is causing,

and that results in an architecture that makes people feel alienated and detached of the

experience of space; design for the eyes creates indeed beautiful works of architecture, but

does not help its users feel integrated or as part of it, it is not meaningful to them, it provides

no sense of place or identify people whatsoever with their culture. This is exactly the problem

with architecture nowadays.

In a world where technology improves everyday and construction methods and processes

are industrialized, the pace by which architectural projects are developed is fasten as

natural materials, that actually “express their age and history as well as the history of their

origins and their history of human use”, as it is put in The Eyes of the Skin (Pallasmaa, 2005, p.

31), are being put aside and traded for more synthetic and artificial manmade materials that

are easier and more practical to build with.

There is clearly a gain in producing architecture in this way, as construction times are

reduced and so less money is invested; but at the same time, so much is lost in the process.

The industrialization of building processes has affected the way architecture is conceived; in

the past, it was important for architecture to expose its true materiality, and nowadays there

is a lack of it, as architecture suffers from a deprivation of sensory experiences.

With the use of modern materials, the sense of touch is suppressed, which consequently limits

the endless possibilities that natural materials offer in terms of sound quality, scents in space

and even the taste of it, as the stimulation of the senses of hearing, smelling and tasting are

deeply related to the tactile sense.

The modern day sculptural like architecture that calls the attention and mainly addresses the

eyes more so than any of the other senses may cause a great impact on people looking at it,

may even be inviting to be explored, and it will certainly be remembered as an icon; but

more often than not, it is all it will ever do for people. On the other hand, there is the more

modest kind of architecture, that with a simpler form that is not designed to impact the eyes,

but the kind which offers a richer experience when explored, that moves its visitors and

evokes emotions. That is the kind of architecture that has been lost, and the kind that should

be built more.

13

Aims and objectives

“Until we can begin to understand how buildings affect individuals and communities

emotionally, how they provide people with a sense of joy, indentity, and place, there is no

way to distinguish architecture from any everyday act of construction.”

Body, memory and architecture (Bloomer and Moore, 1979, p. IX)

This thesis aims to understand how buildings affect people emotionally and how architecture

can through mere elements of design embody meaning and provide people with a wide

range of emotions, identity and sense of place.

The objectives are to draw information from the outcome of the design project in junction

with the already written research about these topics; explore and experience places in ways

never done before to try to understand what they are trying to transmit to their users: hear,

smell, taste, touch and see more; describe the experience of space through the isolation of

the different senses; re-analyze the design project under the considerations as to what is

discovered to be the way to achieve what this thesis explores and finally, suggest how the

project could have been better and what can be done to improve it.

14

Literature Review

The body and the senses

“The role of the body as the locus of perception, thought and

consciousness; significance of the senses in articulating, storing and

processing sensory responses and thoughts.”

The Eyes of the Skin (Pallasmaa, 2005, p. 10)

The human body is an important element that has

been disregarded in architectural design, as it “has

not been a central concern in the understanding of

architectural form” (Bloomer and Moore, 1979, p. IX)

as the book Body, memory and architecture states;

the authors explain that its significance lies in the fact

that it is through the sense of three dimensionality

originated in it, that people are able to understand

space when experiencing it. People experience

space through the senses: which perceive, store and

process responses, become integrated through the

body, and connect people to the world.

Channelling the words of William Shakespeare, if

“All the world's a stage, and all the men and women

merely players”, then architecture can be described

as the set where men and women perform, the place

where people experience and understand the world.

As put in Questions of Perception: phenomenology in architecture (Pallasmaa, 1994, p. 41),

”architecture, more fully than other art forms, engages the immediacy of our sensory

perceptions”, perceptions that are integrated through the body and strengthen the human

existential experience and sense of being in the world. In the experience of architecture the

users are able to perceive the interaction and fusion of sounds and smells, colours and

textures, lights and shadows, the relations of scale and proportion and even the passage of

time; only architecture can and must address simultaneously all of the senses, for it is a multi

sensory experience.

Fig. 18-22. Photos taken by Griselda Arteaga Trejo, August 2011; photos edited by Griselda Arteaga Trejo on www.picnik.com, August

2011.

In the book The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems, (Gibson, 1966) the author, an

American psychologist expert in the field of visual perception, acknowledges the existence

of five senses “capable of obtaining information about objects in the world without the

intervention of an intellectual process”. The author calls them, as the title of the book

suggests, “perceptual systems” and just like the five senses everyone knows, they involve

Fig. 18. Sight Fig. 19. Hearing Fig. 20. Taste Fig. 21. Smell Fig. 22. Touch

Fig. 17. The Vitruvian man, as drawn by Leonardo da

Vinci; source:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vitruvian_Man; image

edited by Griselda Arteaga Trejo on

www.picnik.com, August, 2011.

15

sight, hearing, taste, smell and touch but they are called the “visual system”, “auditory

system”, “taste-smell system”, “basic orienting system” and “haptic system”.

Some of this “systems” are quite self explanatory, while the basic orienting and haptic need

further explanation, as they are also more important, so to speak, in the understanding of

three dimensional space. The basic orienting system refers to the way the body postures itself

and how due to this posture the other senses are equally oriented towards its position; the

haptic system is nothing more than the sense of touch, understood in a way that involves not

only the hands, but the entire body, and includes sensations such as pressure, warmth, cold,

pain and kinaesthetics. (Bloomer and Moore, 1979, p. 34)

All the senses are said to be extensions of the sense of touch, or the haptic system; in fact

“sight detached from touch could not have any idea of distance, outness or profundity, nor

consequently of space or body” (Pallasmaa, 1994, p. 42), for it is through touch that people

sense not only the shape of an object or space, but also its materiality, weight, resistance,

temperature, pleasantness or lack of it; with the sense of sight, the users are able to explore

space, but with the sense of touch, they are able to approach it and feel it. It is the only

sense which deals with the three dimensional world and can make changes to it as it

experiences it.

Whether they are called “perceptual systems” or simply “senses”, they are all important as all

of them are able to perceive the characteristics of space in their own way. If this was not

possible, then a disabled person, whether visually or hearing impaired, would not be able to

experience and enjoy space. This is why it is so important to address all the senses when

designing a building.

16

The auditory system / sense of hearing

“We stare alone at the suspense of a circus, but the burst of applause

after relaxation of suspense unites us with the crowd.”

The Eyes of the Skin (Pallasmaa, 2005, p. 51)

In the same way a space is thought of as beautiful for its form, perceived by the eyes, it can

be equally enjoyed for its acoustic qualities, its echo, vibrations and resonant sounds

perceived by the sense of hearing, which is, more often than not, an unconscious

experience. The echo of a building depends on the materials from which it is made of as well

as from the size and form of the space, amongst other things; even if a person was not able

to see, sound itself is capable of giving an idea of form, size and material, scale and

proportion, moreover, the sounds produced in it can tell a little bit about what goes on inside

and sometimes outside said space.

In the article Should You Add Sound to Your Building Design? (Lehman, n.d) the author, a

designer and researcher from the United States, with a Master in Design from Harvard

University, implies that it is only natural for architects to be concerned with the elimination of

noise within their buildings, noise being understood as a sound that interferes with whatever

activity is supposed to take place in their space; but some architects have become

completely obsessed with the absorption and suppression of echoes, and so they are

“silencing” buildings, cancelling an important sense. The importance of hearing in the

experience of space is often unnoticed, but it is certainly useful to understand it.

In The Eyes of the skin, (Pallasmaa, 2005, p. 49) the author carries a comparison between the

senses of hearing and sight, talks about acoustic intimacy and explains that the sense of

hearing incorporates and makes the users part of the experience of space as sound is omni

directional and perceived by the entire body, as opposed to sight, which is isolating and

directional; he says “buildings do not react to our gaze, but they do return our sounds back

to our ears.” Sound envelops the users, it provides a feeling of interiority, which is how space

can be understood.

In the book Spaces Speak, Are You Listening? (Blesser and Salter, 2007, p. 3) the authors

mention that sometimes, hearing and sight reinforce each other, and they provide the

following example: “the visual vastness of a cathedral communicates through the eyes, while

its enveloping reverberation communicates through the ears.” Also in the book, the authors

briefly discuss the influence that aural architecture can have in moods and associations,

even though people are not consciously aware of this; continuing with examples in religious

buildings, they suggest that “the acoustics of a grand cathedral can create an exalted

mood while those of a chapel can enhance the privacy of quiet contemplation.” (Blesser

and Salter, 2007, p. 2)

Knowing this, Lehman (n.d) suggests that when designing a space, the architect needs to

think about what noises need to be kept out, and what sounds need to be encouraged and

deliberately designed, for some of them can contribute to the thoughts, behaviour and

emotions of the occupants, and as stimuli to the processing of the other senses.

A great example of architecture which uses deliberate sound as a trigger for thought, is

without a doubt the Jewish Museum in Berlin by American architect Daniel Libeskind; the

installation called “Shalekhet” (Fallen Leaves) in the Memory Void, consists of merely 10,000

iron plates roughly shaped like human faces laying across the floor. As the visitor walks all

over them, the sounds they make echo around the space evoking the cries of the victims of

17

the holocaust. This powerful connotation in space, not only alters the mood, but also makes

the visitor reflect upon the experience.

Fig. 23-26. Source: Liliana Vivieros Díaz, August 2011; photos edited by Griselda Arteaga Trejo on www.picnik.com, August 2011.

This example is also a case of hearing and sight reinforcing each other: the idea of the

sounds provoked by the plates as cries of victims, is reinforced by the fact that the plates are

shaped like those victims; it is hard to imagine not being moved by this experience.

All in all, sound needs to be incorporated in more than just music and religious venues and it

should do more than just help the users get an idea of the characteristics of the space;

knowing the potential it has to enhance the architectural experience, more architects should

start incorporating aural experiences to their designs.

Fig. 23. Contemplating

the Memory void.

Fig. 24. The “Fallen

Leaves”

Fig. 25. Making sounds Fig. 26. Reflecting on the

experience.

18

The taste-smell system / sense of taste-smell

“The fragrance of a bread shop projects images of health, sustenance and

physical strength, whereas the perfume of a pastry shop makes one think of

bourgeois felicity...” & it makes my mouth water.

The Eyes of the Skin (Pallasmaa, 2005, p. 54)

Gibson (1966) grouped the senses of smell and taste in one “perceptual system”, the “taste-

smell system”, which is only natural given that both senses are deeply connected; basically

there is no sense of taste, without the sense of smell, for when someone tastes food, there is a

need to be able to smell the odours it releases in order to perceive flavour. This is why when

people are sick and the nose is blocked, food tastes bland.

The idea of “tasting space” does not literally refer to the act of savouring it; in a way, space is

tasted through the combination of the senses of smell, touch and sight, when the scent of a

space plus the shape, texture and colours of its materials evoke oral sensations.

A case of the combination of these senses in the perception of space, was personally

experienced at the Guinness Storehouse in Dublin, a visitor center dedicated to the history

and making of the Guinness beer. Passed the lobby of the building, one enters an area

named “Ingredients” where the displays of the beer‟s ingredients release a mixture of smells

of barley, hops, yeast and water, which can almost make one taste the flavour of the beer

and suddenly crave a pint.

Fig. 27-30. Photos taken by Griselda Arteaga Trejo, July 2011; photos edited by Griselda Arteaga Trejo on www.picnik.com, August

2011.

As far as the sense of smell, it is safe to say that if one was to think that it is not as relevant for

the experience of space as other senses, then one would be wrong. If the smell is neutral

people may not notice it sometimes, but when it is good or bad, there is certainly something

to say about it; people do not leave a place because they are not happy or uncomfortable

with its colour, shape, lighting or its acoustic qualities, but they will certainly leave it if the

smell is unpleasant, and that is quite relevant.

Smells in buildings come from the materials of it, as well as from the activities taking place

within it, and the surrounding environment; therefore, different places will have different

smells. Because some spaces are identified with certain smells, like a bathroom, a garden or

a kitchen, a person could try to experience a building with no other sense than smell, and

could probably be able to find the way around.

In the article Scent as Design for SEED Magazine (Wisten, 2010) the author interviews the

organizers of an event called Headspace: On Scent as Design, a one-day symposium on the

conception, impact, and potential applications of scent as new territory for design. In this

Fig. 27. Barley as exhibited

in the Guinness Storehouse.

Fig. 28. Hops as exhibited in

the Guinness Storehouse.

Fig. 29. How these senses

are stimulated in space.

Fig. 30. Pint of Guinness

19

interview, it is critiqued how in modern architecture, smells are often eliminated or covered

through new finishes, air control systems and antiseptic surfaces, without considering their

great potential; furthermore, it is acknowledged that beyond providing a healthy and

pleasant environment in space, the sense of smell has the ability to trigger behaviour,

memory and mood, as it is linked to parts of the brain that deal with emotions. This is broadly

discussed in the article Olfaction and Memory (Neumann and Medwid, n.d) where it is

explained that the sense of smell evokes emotionally potent memories because of the

proximity of the part of the brain where olfactory processes take place and that which is

responsible for emotions and memory.

According to the article Scent as Design (Wisten, 2010), people inadvertently make

associations when experiencing a scent; this is how scents become part of a brand and

even popular culture. A case of this was found through a recent personal experience:

walking down Champs-Élysées in Paris, this incredibly rich scent struck the ambiance, a

man‟s cologne, which happens to be the signature scent of Abercrombie and Fitch. Looking

around, a group of people waiting in line outside a beautiful gateway guarded by two very

attractive male models was found; as it turns out, the store was right there, but it was actually

nowhere in sight; the scent previously recognized announced the location, and thus the

presence of the store.

Fig. 31. Source:

http://www.abercrombie.co.uk/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ProductDisplay?catalogId=10901&categoryId=12232&langId=-

1&productId=272918&storeId=12406, August 2011; Fig. 32-34. Photos taken by Griselda Arteaga Trejo, August 2011; all photos edited

by Griselda Arteaga Trejo on www.picnik.com, August 2011.

The previous example shows that by stimulating the sense of smell architects can make

people react, think or feel a certain way, because of the associations they have to particular

smells, which of course may vary from one person to another; but in the end, scents add

texture, depth and richness to the experience of space, and a higher level of symbolism in

terms of human connection to meaning and personal stories.

Fig. 31. Fierce, signature

fragrance of A&F.

Fig. 32. Waiting line to

enter the store.

Fig.33. Signature greeters

at the gate.

Fig. 34. A&F logo

20

The haptic system/ sense of touch

“The total perception of architectural spaces depends as much on the

material and detail of the haptic realm as the taste of a meal depends

on the flavours of authentic ingredients”.

Questions of Perception: Phenomenology in Architecture (Pallasmaa, 1994, p. 91)

In the book Experiencing Architecture, (Rasmusen, 1989, p. 176) the author describes how

Walter Gropius believed that the senses needed to be trained to a higher degree of

awareness, than in ordinary schools, and so in the Staatliches Bauhaus, the school he

founded in Germany in 1919, students learned about materials through their own

experiments, putting special emphasis on the sense of touch. Even back then, people were

aware of the loss of sensitive awareness in textural surfaces, and believed that training young

architects and artists in the sense of tactility would improve the production of high textural

quality in all sorts of designs.

In the article Maximizing the sense of touch in adaptive architecture, (Lehman, n.d) the

author tackles the importance of the sense of touch in architecture, stating that it lies within

the fact that it is the most informative sense human beings possess; even if a person was not

able to see, when one stops to think about it, by touching, this person could easily get an

idea of how the space is shaped, what it is made of, the resistance of the material, how soft

or hard it is, its temperature, and overall, picture what it looks like and what it is used for; at

the same time, the feel of the ambiance perceived through the body, turns into an

experience of space and place and the sense of touch helps the users understanding it in a

way that none of the other senses can.

It has already been said that the problem with architecture nowadays is its lack of

materiality; when the sense of touch is suppressed, the experience of space is poor, as users

are not engaged in the experience, but are merely visitors in that place. Touching makes the

visitors feel part of something, in this case the visited space, in the same way people feel

close to someone when touching them.

The best way to incorporate the sense of touch in architecture, and with this, engage the

users in the experience of the space, is by the use of materials and textures, that not only

bring life to space but also create a unique and richer experience for the senses: different

surfaces invite the users to experience them not only with their hands, but with their entire

bodies, to feel them, to sense them, even to taste them. Moreover, as exposed in Body,

Memory and Architecture (Bloomer and Moore, 1979, p. 71) “changes of textures often signal

special events and can trigger a slower or quickening of one‟s pace.” This notion implies that

architects can design the way they want the users to move around the building, by the

change of textures in the space.

An appropriate example to this use of texture in architecture is the project of Mexican

architect Mauricio Rocha, in Mexico City, titled Centro de Invidentes y Débiles Visuales

(Center for the Sightless and Visually Impaired), a social and cultural center that aims to

improve the integration of the visually impaired to society. In the project, different materials

are used within the complex, including concrete, different kinds of stones, glass, steel, and

even water; tactile cues are provided so that the users of the building can find their way

around, such as: vertical and horizontal lines in the concrete walls, located at hand height to

21

identify the different buildings, and lines of stones and a water channel along the floor which

help guiding the routes around the site.

Fig. 35-38. Source: http://www.plataformaarquitectura.cl/2011/08/05/centro-de-invidentes-y-debiles-visuales-taller-de-arquitectura-

mauricio-rocha/, August 2011; all images edited by Griselda Arteaga Trejo on www.picnik.com, August 2011.

Another important thing to think about regarding the tactile sense, is how the use of different

materials can, not only change the perception of space, but also the way people will feel

within it, which depends on each person. A space can have the exact same size and form,

but the change of its materials will cause different sensations; for example, an inhabitable

cube made of brick might make one feel claustrophobic, and one made of glass, might

make the same person feel safe because of the ability to see what is in the surroundings; to

another person, the brick cube might represent safety, while the glass one might represent

insecurity and overexposure.

It has been said before that the haptic system or sense of touch is the only one who can alter

the environment as it experiences it, so considering this, architects have the opportunity to

design interactive spaces with surfaces or features where the users actually collaborate in

creating and altering the space. A great example of this is Frida Escobedo‟s Eco Pavilion at

the Museo Experimental El Eco in Mexico City; with the repetition of one element, the

concrete block, and its stacking as some kind of topography on site, the proposal manages

to accommodate different arrangements according to the needs of the space, and it offers

the visitor the chance to reconfigure it themselves and even the chance to take a piece of

architecture home when leaving the museum.

Fig. 39-40. Source: http://fridaescobedo.net/frida_web/projects/Pages/El_Eco_pavilion.html, August 2011; fig. 41-42. Photos taken by

Griselda Arteaga Trejo, June 2010; all images and photos edited by Griselda Arteaga Trejo on www.picnik.com, August 2011.

Lehman (n.d) reckons that as architecture continues to evolve, the way in which users

interact with buildings will too, as architecture becomes responsive; but whether this

happens or not, what is important is not to lose this interaction between the space and the

users, and not to forget that in deciding what materials to use in space lies the opportunity to

create a memorable tactile experience.

Fig. 41. Frida Escobedo during

an event at the Pavilion.

Fig. 42. Visitors experiencing the

space during the same event.

Fig. 40. Another configuration of

space.

Fig. 39. One of the possible

arrangements of the space.

Fig. 35. Sketch of the

textures of concrete

Fig. 38. Tactile cues on the

floor.

Fig. 37. Different textures on

opposite walls.

Fig. 36. Different materials

to identify a building

22

The visual system / sense of sight

“I urge you to open your eyes. Do you open your eyes? Are

you trained to open your eyes? Do you know how to open your

eyes, do you open them often, always, well?”

Le Corbusier

as quoted from The Eyes of the Skin (Pallasmaa, 2005, p. 27)

Although it has been criticized how much architects are concerned with the looks of a

building and how much importance they place on form and aesthetics, it is a fact that what

most people first notice about buildings, is exactly how they look. If one thinks about it, when

asked to describe a place, the description will not state: “the acoustics were great!” or “the

place smelled really nice”; more likely it will state something like: “it was big, bright and

yellow”, which are characteristics of the space perceived with the eyes.

Indeed, the sense of sight is very important in architecture: with the eyes people are able to

perceive the form, size, depth, colour and texture of a space; they are even capable to

notice the pass of time throughout the day, due to the changes in light, which is another very

important element in the experience of architecture, for the spatial impressions it is capable

of providing, when manipulated in the right way.

But just as light, shadow is equally relevant in the experience of space; in The Eyes of the Skin

(Pallasmaa, 2005, p. 46) the author reflects upon the fact that people tend to close the eyes

during emotional experiences. He writes that “deep shadows and darkness are essential

because they dim the sharpness of vision, make depth and distance ambiguous, and invite

unconscious peripheral vision and tactile fantasy.” Dim lights and shadows in space stimulate

the imagination the same way mist and twilight do, and that is because what users are

capable to see becomes unclear and ambiguous, creating an interesting experience.

This experience is made possible in The Blur Building, a Pavilion by Diller, Scofidio + Renfro, a

New York based Firm. The building is located at the base of the Lake Neuchatel in Yverdon-

les-Bains, Switzerland. They call it “an architecture of atmosphere”, where natural and

manmade forces create a foggy mass that surrounds the structure of the building; upon

entrance, vision is blurred in order to demonstrate at a great scale how much people

depend on it, and ironically, it fails to perceive all of the conditions of space it would notice

otherwise. Talk about a memorable experience.

Fig. 43-46. Source: http://www.dsrny.com/, August 2011; all images edited by Griselda Arteaga Trejo on www.picnik.com, August

2011.

When it comes to design for the eyes, it is the job of the architect to take advantage of the

many elements, architectural or natural than can enhance an architectural project, besides

the right use of light or shadows. The form is one of the most important things users perceive

Fig. 43. The blur building. Fig. 44. The structure. Fig. 46. Blured vision

inside the building. Fig. 45. Interior space

23

with the eyes, for it informs whether the space might be safe to explore or not; pointy or edgy

surfaces might give a sense of danger or insecurity, even if they are not being touched, while

rounded edges are more friendly and inviting.

In Experiencing Architecture, (Rasmussen, 1989, p. 218) the author elaborates on the use of

colour, saying that it not only addresses the character of a building and suggests its function,

but it also can accentuate forms: it can make objects seem lighter or heavier than they are,

large or small, near or distant, cool or warm; the author also references an unknown German

theorist who suggests that colour can equally emphasize and differentiate what is up, from

what is down; he said that colours need to address this orientation and so he related tones of

clay or ground to the floor, bright colours as those of flowers and trees to the walls, and light

and airy “sky like” tones to the ceilings. This makes complete sense: walking on pink floors

would be like walking in a cloud, and having a black ceiling over our heads would be like

carrying a heavy load. (Rasmussen, 1989, p. 219)

The works of Mexican architect Luis Barragán can fall into the category of visual architecture,

cause it mostly addresses the eyes: it is very formal, his designs are based on geometrical

compositions with basic elements; it is colourful, accentuates elements and differentiates

ground, from walls and ceilings; it is concerned with people‟s relation to nature, so views of

the surroundings are often framed. Nonetheless, it implicates more than just that; it is

concerned with the creation of ambiances in space, which the architect believes can

inspire people, and this is pursuit and achieved through the manipulation of light, in order to

change perceptions within the same space.

Fig. 47-50. Source: http://www.plataformaarquitectura.cl/2011/08/09/clasicos-de-arquitectura-casa-estudio-luis-barragan-luis-

barragan/, August 2011; all images edited by Griselda Arteaga Trejo on www.picnik.com, August 2011.

Colour is also a powerful communication tool which can be used to signal action, trigger

emotions and attitudes, and it can have an impact on performance. There are a whole lot of

studies about colour as a factor in human behaviour that architects recur to in order to

support what they want to express through the use of certain colours in space.

It is not wrong for the architect to be concerned with the formal and aesthetic aspects of

architecture, but the right approach for architectural design needs to go beyond visual

appearances and be conscious of all the senses; as put by the author in the book

Intertwining: “the experience of material in architecture is not just visual but tactile, aural,

olfactory: it is all of these intertwined with space and our bodily trajectory in time.” (Holl, 1996)

Fig. 47. Geometrical elements

in the composition.

Fig. 48. Different use of colour

in walls and floors.

Fig. 49. The connection to

nature is framed.

Fig. 50. Use of light to change

ambiance in the space.

24

Sense of place

“Doy gracias a la arquitectura porque me ha permitido

ver el mundo con sus ojos”

(I thank architecture for it has allowed me to see the

world with its eyes”)

Rafael Moneo

When a place is capable of leaving a mark on us, in our bodies and our minds, it is said to

have a strong sense of place. In the book Body, Memory and Architecture (Bloomer and

Moore, 1979, p. 107) the authors imply that the process of acquiring a sense of place occurs

in time, goes beyond the visual impression and is complex, more so than the image which

people will later remember; for people remember a place for its uniqueness, because of the

impressions it has made in their bodies, and because of the associations they make within.

There is no universal definition for the term “sense of place” as it is an abstract concept;

basically people develop a sense of place through their experience of it. It has to do with the

knowledge of the place and its culture, but most importantly it has to do with the memories

of it, the ones people create there. A place becomes special when the views, sounds, local

people, tastes and even the smells mean something to the visitors or even the inhabitants of

that place; when those who use it can identify themselves with it. By these means it is possible

to define a place and to be tied to it.

Evidently, memory and the sense of place are closely linked; according to the article

“Neuroscience and Architecture: Seeking Common Ground” (Sternberg and Wilson, 2006)

they are both involved in the same part of the brain, and so it explains that “our memory of

events may depend upon a strong sense of place, and by extension, our sense of place may

be influenced by the integrity of the memories formed there.”

Not only architecture can provide people with a sense of place, but it is important that it

does so; it will happen when it is capable of creating a truly memorable experience for its

users. The importance of the stimulation of the senses in creating a meaningful experience

has already been extensively discussed, but it is not the only way; Mexican designer Héctor

Galván believes that incorporating popular and traditional culture in the experience of

space is another way to provide a sense of place, for culture is an important factor in

shaping one‟s identity, and also because it links people to the place, its history and traditions.

For Catholics everywhere, specially Mexicans, La Villa in Mexico City has without a doubt a

very strong sense of place, as the history of Catholic faith becomes present through

architecture. La Villa is the complex where the Basilica de Nuestra Señora de Guadalupe

(Basilica of Our Lady of Guadalupe), Templo Expiatorio a Cristo Rey (the old Basilica) and

other smaller Churches are located, around a central square. This is one of the most

important sanctuaries of Catholicism in the world, and is visited by millions of people every

year, because of the history that surrounds it. It is located at the foot of the Cerro del

Tepeyac (Tepeyac Hill), where the Lady of Guadalupe appeared to Juan Diego in 1531, and

it now houses the original Tilma (apron) where her image was miraculously imprinted as proof

for the bishop of Mexico, Fray Juan de Zumárraga, that she had indeed showed herself to

Juan Diego.

Standing in the middle of the square one can see the new Basilica on the left, the old one on

the right, and in the background the Cerro del Tepeyac (Tepeyac Hill), with its humble

25

Chapel. One can smell the scents of street food and traditional sweets sold in the

marketplace, and hear the sounds of it, just outside the gates that lead into the square,

where one can also hear chants of the choir inside the Basilica during mass; groups of

people of all ages, races and nationalities, gather around the square to take in the view

before deciding where to attend first. In this place, the history and the past are not erased;

the new Basilica, was not built to replace the old one, as the old one did not replace the

original Chappel on top of the hill; each one is an evolution of the previous, each is unique

and important, and they all co-exist, complementing each other. Past and present fuse into

the same place, giving sustenance to the Catholic faith and the history of Mexico.

Fig. 51. Source: http://www.diosjesustehabla.com/Guadalupe/home_juandiego_.htm, August 2011; Fig. 52-54. Photos taken by

Griselda Arteaga Trejo, September 2010; image and photos edited by Griselda Arteaga Trejo on www.picnik.com, August 2011.

Fig. 55. Panoramic view of the square Plaza Mariana; source: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/43/Basilica-

PlazaMariana.jpg, edited by Griselda Arteaga Trejo on www.picnik.com, August 2011.

In the article entitled Designing a sense of place: don’t forget memory! (Lehman, n.d.) the

author talks about how the ability to interact in space with other users, as well as with the

space itself, gives a feeling of belonging rather than just passing through it; Lehman also

mentions that the incorporation of certain architectural elements can help a space to be

remembered as they become some sort of signals that guide the users and help orienting

them through the building. All of these elements are helpful to provide a strong sense of

place.

The sense of place depends vastly in the interpretation given by each user of the space, and

this interpretation depends on social, cultural and economical factors as well as the user‟s

education; a person who has been educated in architecture will have a broader criterion to

interpret and understand the intentions of the architect. However, the interpretation of other

people is no less valuable, whether they understand the architect‟s intention or not; Mexican

architect Mauricio Rocha believes that although sometimes people‟s perceptions greatly

Fig. 51. An illustration of the

apparition in the Tepeyac.

Fig. 52. The old Basilica. Fig. 53. The New Basilica Fig. 54. Juan Diego‟s tilma

inside the new Basilica.

26

differ to the architect‟s original intention, this enriches the work even more, as users discover

meanings the architect had not even thought of himself.

When the architecture is experienced, and the experience is memorable, it becomes

personal and it stops belonging to the architect; it becomes about what one perceives

because one makes the space their own through that personal experience, and so when

the person leaves the space and tells other people about it, it is that experience that is

shared, personal perceptions and interpretations.

27

Memory

“In the experience of art, a peculiar exchange takes place; I lend my

emotions and associations to the space, and the space lends me its

aura, which entices and emancipates my perceptions and thoughts.”

The Eyes of the Skin (Pallasmaa, 2005, p. 12)

The task of the architect is not only to solve rational problems and to satisfy previously

established functional or aesthetical needs; in the book The Thinking Hand (Pallasmaa, 2009,

p. 109) it is stated that “architecture is always expected to evoke human, experiential and

existential values that cannot be prescribed”. Architecture is meant to guide the body

through its form with the ability to stimulate mental images full with emotional connotations,

already rooted in the individual‟s own perceptions and sensory memories; it will only be

moving, if it can achieve this.

When people visit a space, emotional baggage is carried along... when architecture is

capable of touching the human soul by evoking feelings, emotions and memories brought

with the visitors, the experience of space becomes emotional and the architecture thus

becomes meaningful. Architecture does not invent meanings, the visitors give meanings to it,

through our experience.

Sometimes, when listening to a song, it transports the listener back to a specific time and

place; when smelling a certain scent, the thought of someone familiar who is now missed,

comes to mind; when seeing something, there is a remembrance of a time when that thing

was present, not too long ago. This is only possible because there are neural connections in

the brain between the senses and memories; memories are stored in brain regions which are

associated with the input of the senses, so when they are stimulated, memories come back

to mind. This study by Benedetto Sacchetti, as reported in the article Found: A Possible Link

Between Emotional Memories and Sensory Triggers (Discover Magazine, 2010), explains why

people link certain sounds, smells and sights with specific memories, and thus this explains

how then, architecture, through the stimulation of the senses can move people by reminding

them of those meaningful past experiences.

Here lies the importance of addressing all the senses in architecture, the ability to somehow

enhance the experience of space, affect people emotionally and through mere elements of

design, embody meaning and provide people with a wide range of emotions, identity and

sense of place, by creating a meaningful encounter. Architects have the power, moreover

the moral obligation, to achieve this with designs.

Of course, designing to trigger memory is not as easy as it sounds, after all, the experience of

space depends not only on the elements of design, but also on the user‟s susceptibility,

mentality, education, culture and even the mood at the moment; nonetheless, architects,

must take advantage of this incredible opportunity to try and provide the users in buildings a

truly meaningful, profound, memorable experience.

28

Research Strategy

There is a concern in the academic sector regarding the search for a proper methodology

and a better understanding of research processes concerning design. Research, as well as

Design, is an activity conditioned by a great number of factors, which is why there is not a

unique method capable of adapting to the different conditions and needs for each

particular case.

One of the most popular classifications in terms of research concerning design is that

explained in the book Research into Art and Design (Frayling, 1993): the “for-about-through”

paradigm, or research FOR design, research ABOUT design and research THROUGH design.

Research FOR design is that which is carried for the development of a design project, and so

design is the final product. In Reseach into Art & Design (Frayling, 1993) the author appoints

that in this type of research, the aim is not to achieve communicative knowledge, not in the

verbal kind of way although maybe indeed in a visual one. Its aim is actually to make sure

that the different conditional factors in design have been properly considered when

developing the project.

Although this type of research is the most common in the practice of design, it is not

scientifically accepted as it is based in readily available knowledge, and because the

knowledge involved is not to be published or discussed by the research community. Also in

the book, (Frayling, 1993) the author believes that usually, research for design does not

possess the quality for doctorate programs, although it is known that this type of research

does not aim for that, but for the development of a particular project.

Research ABOUT design, is done by disciplines unrelated to design, such as anthropology,

history, and psychology among others. According to Research Through Design and

Transdisciplinarity: A Tentaive Contribution to the Methodology of Design Research (Findeli,

2008) is that carried about projects of design, its processes, users, meanings and importance

for society, business, culture, etcetera; by this means, it does not generate useful knowledge,

for it is design itself the subject of investigation in order to generate knowledge for other

disciplines.

The author of Research into Art & Design (Frayling, 1993) states that this type of research is

more common in doctorate programs and is closely related to historical research, research

about aesthetics or perception and research about other theoretical perspectives like

economical, social, political or cultural, which somehow involve art or design.

Reseach THROUGH design, is that which is carried through the development of a design

project, in which the different processes and approaches towards it generate knowledge

and results. The design itself is both the subject and object of the investigation; one starts off

from a design to generate knowledge about it; this is sustained by the understanding that

there is no separation between theory and practice of design.

The author of Research Through Design and Transdisciplinarity: A Tentaive Contribution to the

Methodology of Design Research (Findeli, 2008) states that research through design should

be understood as the integration of research for design and research about design. From the

first, it takes the interest to improve the practice of design, and from the second, the

methodological rigidity; this is the preferred approach by the academic community as it

generates useful knowledge for design through rigorous and systematic procedures.

The research carried to develop this thesis is that which is done through design; throughout

most of the academic year 2010-2011, an architectural project was developed in the design

studio: a museum named mudei: museo de la inundación (Museum of the inundation). The

project looks at the traces and memories left by the flood that occurred as a result of the

hurricane Karl, in Veracruz, México, in September of 2010.

The museum aims to show visitors the catastrophic social and material affects of flooding in

remembrance of the homes and businesses which once existed in the area or were badly

damaged during the event. The “experience spaces” allow visitors to empathize with the

29

victim‟s unfortunate situation, while the “museum” part of the project‟s goal is to educate

those most vulnerable to flooding in the future.

In developing this project, it was important to understand how the building would affect

people emotionally, whether they had experienced the flood from the inside, being victims,

or from the outside, as spectators. The design approach for the project meant to focus more

on the invisible effects of space, the experience made possible, through the creation of

provocative experiences.

In this thesis, this matter is tackled as it is tried to understand how buildings affect people

emotionally and how architecture can through mere elements of design embody meaning

and reinforce people‟s identity and sense of place. In order to do this, this work is backed up

by the design project done during the academic year 2010-2011, for it was a way to explore

these things in a more practical way; doing/designing is helpful because one is able to find

things out on its own, one becomes more involved, and gets the hands dirty so to speak.

Drawings, plans and sections are included to describe and illustrate the design process and

the outcomes of the project, as well as the findings in terms of achieving what the thesis

explores.

Besides the design work, one of the first exercises carried for the purpose of this thesis,

consisted in asking different kinds of people, non architects and architects, what their

definition for architecture was, in order to prove a point later addressed in the introduction:

the misconception of architecture. The images of this people were provided by each one of

them, who happily agreed to take part in the exercise. Also, definitions of architecture from

some famous architects were taken from different internet sources, as were their pictures, in

contrast to the definitions provided by others previously questioned.

Due to the nature of the topic of this thesis, the methodological approach needed to be

more experiential, rather than bibliographical, but this does not mean that bibliographical

sources were not used to further understand what was obtained from the development of

the project; several books and online articles were consulted in order to deepen into the

subjects of the experience, phenomenology, perception, memory, and the senses in

architecture. Some of these topics are broadly exemplified by images of architectural

projects that the author of this thesis is familiar with, and others which were appointed by

people familiar with them. Certain images where taken by the author who personally

experienced some of the buildings, others were provided by people who did that as well,

and the remaining images were taken from different internet sources.

It was noted though, that in order to understand how buildings affect people, beyond

reading about it, it was necessary to experience this personally, by going to a building and

experiencing it, really taking the time to do it: to see it, to touch it, to hear it, to smell it and to

taste it, to try to understand what the intention behind it was, or to find what it caused to this

particular visitor. Having read a lot about how space is experienced, this exercise was very

successful in terms of understanding the place chosen, and many things were found out

which strengthen and support this work. The exercise and findings were recorded as notes

which are presented as an appendix, at the end of this thesis.

This exercise inspired yet another one of the same species, this time regarding the

architectural project originally developed; a fictional narrative describing the experience in

the museum of the inundation, which is now informed not only by the design, but also by the

bibliographical sources and other personal experiences; accompanied by old drawings

developed throughout the year, they intend to visually illustrate as much as it is possible, the

experience of the museum of the inundation.

30

Methodology

mudei: museo de la inundación (museum of the inundation)

Location and site

The project is located in the city of Veracruz, in the state of the same name, on the south

east coast of México, in North America.

Fig. 56-58. México in North America, Source: http://dailycoloringpages.com/map-coloring-pages/, February 2011; Veracruz in México,

Source: http://badmintonplaya.com/modules/com_sobi2/?mapa-de-mexico-estados-1956, February 2011; and Veracruz in Veracruz,

Source: http://www.coneval.gob.mx/cmsconeval/rw/resource/coneval/entidades/4681.jpg, February 2011; all images edited by

Griselda Arteaga Trejo on Photshop, February 2011.

The site for the project is the fraccionamiento Floresta (Floresta neighborhood), a residential

area mostly, that continuously suffers from flooding during rainy season due to the fact that it

was built over one a half meters below sea level, and is surrounded by higher grounds whose

rainwater slips down creating a “Veracruzan Venice” every time it rains.

Fig. 59-60. Aerial view of the city of Veracruz, framing the Floresta neighborhood, Source: google maps, February 2011; aerial view of

the inundated floresta neighborhood, Source: http://www.jornada.unam.mx/2010/09/24/estados/033n1est, February 2011; all images

edited by Griselda Arteaga Trejo on Photoshop, February 2011.

This matter was only worsen by the aftermath of Hurricane Karl in September of 2010, when

everything in the neighborhood ended up under water, leaving people trapped in the roofs

of their homes, having to be rescued in boats by members of the federal army, without

mentioning the great material loses; this situation made the then state governor make the

decision to evacuate everyone living in the neighborhood, to transform it into a lagoon park,

where people could go for recreational purposes.

31

Fig. 61-68. Images of the neighborhood underwater after the pass of Hurricane Karl in September of 2010; Sources (first line):

xeu.com.mx, September 2010; (second line)Santiago B.G, September 2010; all images and photos edited by Griselda Arteaga Trejo

on Photoshop and www.picnik.com, February 2011.

People living in the area did not agree with this decision; even thought the government had

a plan to transfer everyone to a safer place in the outskirts of the city and compensate them

for their land within the neighborhood, they did not want to leave. People are attached to

this site; they have created memories and did not feel thrilled about the idea of erasing

everything off the area as though as it had never existed.

For several reasons, mainly economical, but also social and political, a project like this could

never happen in this place, but this architectural project was developed under the

assumption that it was possible.

Masterplan

The first stage of the project was to develop a masterplan, but there were many factors to

consider: the governor wanted the whole place to be a recreational area, but inhabitants of

the place did not want to leave. The reason why the governor was opposed to building in

the area was the continuous flooding, rainy season or not. Having to deal with issues

concerning this was time consuming and expensive, so instead of finding a solution for the

problem, it was easier to not having to worry by not building there. Of course, people would

not accept this, as most of them had lived in the neighborhood all their lives, and were used

to having everything at the ready, given the great location of the site.

In order to comply with everyone‟s needs, a middle ground was found in sectioning the area

into zones where different uses would have their own space to develop: housing,

commercial, recreational (parks and lagoons) and cultural (the museum).

Looking after people‟s connections and memories of the site, the new masterplan tried to

keep certain things; the zoning of the new neighborhood was done by selecting areas

divided by different existing traffic routes inside the area, based on their location, and use

within the neighborhood, to chose the best routes to move around. Also in consideration to

assigning a use for each zone, was an environmental study regarding wind and natural light,

and also factors such as noise and connectivity to the city.

Fig. 65. The Church at the

Floresta neighborhood.

Fig. 66. Rescue boats from

the federal army in action.

Fig. 67. The neighbourhood

is lost in this body of water. Fig. 68. The interior of a home

in the neighborhood.

Fig. 61. Water levels inside the

neighborhood.

Fig. 62. The market at the

Floresta neighborhood.

Fig. 63. Cars and houses

underwater.

Fig. 64. People trapped on

the roofs.

32

Fig. 69. The site plan with the

zones divided by the north,

south, east and west avenues

which circulate around the

neighbourhood. Images drawn

by Griselda Arteaga Trejo on

AutoCAD, and by hand,

March 2011; edited by

Griselda Arteaga Trejo on

Photoshop, May 2011.

Fig. 70. The site plan with the

zones divided by the most

circulated routes around the

neighbourhood. Images drawn

by Griselda Arteaga Trejo on

AutoCAD, and by hand,

March 2011; edited by Griselda

Arteaga Trejo on Photoshop,

May 2011.

Fig. 71. The site plan with the

zones divided by the different

access routes to the

neighbourhood. Images drawn

by Griselda Arteaga Trejo on

AutoCAD, and by hand,

March 2011; edited by Griselda

Arteaga Trejo on Photoshop,

May 2011.

Fig. 72. The site plan with the

zones divided by the

combination of all the previous

zonings. Images drawn by

Griselda Arteaga Trejo on

AutoCAD, and by hand,

March 2011; edited by Griselda

Arteaga Trejo on Photoshop,

May 2011.

33

Flooding still needed to be fought and the best solution was found in the decision to build

above flood levels, in order to prevent water from reaching buildings and causing even

more material loses; so, each zone would be elevated and the site would look like a

manmade landscape. Also, the creation of the main lagoon, and channels that would go

around the neighborhood would help in terms of containing water, both sliding from higher

grounds around, and that overflowed from the Canal de la Zamorana (Channel of the

Zamorana) in the southern boundary of the site, in order to prevent it from reaching buildings,

even at their new height.

Fig. 75-77. Site study model which shows the different conditions of flooding on site, with the elevated manmade landscape: site on a

regular basis, site during a normal flood, and site during a big flood; model made by Griselda Arteaga Trejo, March 2011; photos

taken by Griselda Arteaga Trejo, March 2011; photos edited by Griselda Arteaga Trejo on Photoshop, May 2011.

Museum

The original idea of the museum, was to showcase the disaster of the Hurricane in the

particular area, through a series of exhibitions that would display images and sets of

destruction in the most literal way possible, as a way to show people what had happened.

The museum was to be located waterside, because of its relation to water and the

inundation; different explorations in terms of form and function were carried, trying to tie the

building to its context and reason for development.

Fig. 78-81. Different study models placed on the site model, made by Griselda Arteaga Trejo, March 2011; photos taken by Griselda

Arteaga Trejo, March 2011; photos edited by Griselda Arteaga Trejo on Photoshop, May 2011 and www.picnik.com, August 2011.

Fig. 73. Environmental study of

sunlight and wind, plus noise

pollution; Fig. 74. Final zoning

strategy considering the

environmental study; All

Images drawn by Griselda

Arteaga Trejo on AutoCAD,

March 2011; edited by Griselda

Arteaga Trejo on Photoshop,

May 2011.

Fig. 78. First model Fig. 79. Second model Fig. 80. Third model. Fig. 81. Fourth model, to be

developed further.

34

The form chosen to develop was a typical double pitch roof house, tipped on its side and

partly underwater, which basically was a very literal representation of what had happened in

the area, reason why this form was given up on, as it became doubtful that people would

want such a reminder of the disaster they had already experienced.

Fig. 81-84. Sketches of the form initially chosen for the building and further development of the conceptual model addressing the

chosen form, made by Griselda Arteaga Trejo, March 2011; photos taken by Griselda Arteaga Trejo, March 2011; photos edited by

Griselda Arteaga Trejo on Photoshop, May 2011 and www.picnik.com, August 2011.

Reflecting on this matter, it was realized that the project had not been approached in the

best way, and so it went back to the beginning in terms of questioning what was the purpose

of the museum, how it could be connected to the place where it would stand, how it would

remind people of what had happened there, how it would make people feel to visit it,

etcetera.

Fig. 86. Brainstorming notes (in English and Spanish) about the project, written by Griselda Arteaga Trejo, March 2011; scanned by

Griselda Arteaga Trejo, May 2011; edited by Griselda Arteaga Trejo on Photoshop, May 2011 and www.picnik.com, August 2011.

It was then when it became clear that the purpose of the project was, as it has been

previously described in this chapter, to “allow visitors to empathize with the victim‟s

unfortunate situation” and to “educate those most vulnerable to flooding in the future”.

This project was focused on developing the “experience spaces”, where people would be

able to walk in the shoes, so to speak, of those affected by the flood, but the question was

“how?” The first ideas that came to mind were evidently the obvious, the literal kind which

involved people actually walking inside a flooded house within the museum, where they

Fig. 82. Conceptual sketches. Fig. 83. Study model showing

access to the building.

Fig. 84. Study model view

from the south east.

Fig. 85. Study model view

from the south.

35

would get wet, stumble upon things and would need to be rescued by a boat that would

get them to safety, aka another part of the museum; another idea involved a walking tour,

between two themed rooms at the time, where one would be able to see the before and

after of the flood by looking from one room to the other.

For sure these two experiences would have caused an impression on the visitors of the

museum, and they certainly would have made them feel what the actual victims felt, but it

makes one wonder if going through all that trouble is really necessary to empathize with the

situation, and the answer is no. It was pointed to the author of this project, that sometimes,

one does not need to be so literal to explain certain things, and so the real work began.

It was then questioned “how does someone who experiences this, feel?”, and so, research

went back to the beginning of the year, when four people who had experienced the flood,

from the inside and outside, were asked to narrate their experience. (This narratives are

available to read in the appendix at the end of this thesis.)

Fear, insecurity, uncertainty, helplessness, desperation, sadness, preoccupation. Safety versus

danger. Coldness. Humidity. Darkness versus light. Bad smells. Dirtiness. Disgust. Stains.

Watermarks. Inability to communicate. These words are taken from the above mentioned

narratives; some of them are literal, others are implied, but in the end, they all refer to the

same thing, the experience of the flood.

Before actually deciding how these ideas/concepts would be represented or provoked in

the spaces of the museum, a program needed to be established; for once, there would be

the separation between the experience spaces and the museum educational area, and it

was decided that these two different areas would not be connected to each other. For

some people, re-living the traumatic experience would not be as pleasant, and so there was

no point in having them going through that to get to the educational area.

Fig. 87-88. Schematic diagrams of circulation for the different areas of the museum; drawn by Griselda Arteaga Trejo on AutoCAD

and edited on Photoshop, May 2011.

For the experience spaces, a route through the museum was designed, based on the

already explored main traffic routes of the neighborhood; in a smaller scale, by going

around the museum, one would be going around the old neighborhood, and at the end of

each route, one would enter a experience space.

36

Fig. 89-91. From the original circulation in the old neighborhood, to the zoning of the site and circulation in the museum; fig. 88. Drawn

by Griselda Arteaga Trejo on AutoCAD, March 2011; study models of site and building made by Griselda Arteaga Trejo, March 2011;

photos taken by Griselda Arteaga Trejo, March 2011; photos edited by Griselda Arteaga Trejo on www.picnik.com, August 2011.

All the experience spaces consist of a room of the same size, to which visitors arrive in after

walking either up or downstairs through a tunnel like hallway; but each experience space is

different as each is meant to evoke a different moment of the inundation. What moment

each space would evoke depended on location in the museum, or its location on the route.

The routes point to different locations within the new neighborhood: the lagoon, the city and

the neighborhood itself, and they take the visitors around the building, in four different levels.

Fig. 92-94. Conceptual sketches drawn by Griselda Arteaga Trejo, April 2011; photos taken by Griselda Arteaga Trejo, August 2011;

photos edited by Griselda Arteaga Trejo on www.picnik.com, August 2011; image drawn by Griselda Arteaga Trejo on AutoCAD and

edited on Photoshop, May 2011.

The first experience space on the route is below ground, on level -2, and it is one of the

spaces that are pointed towards the lagoon; for this reason, the space is conceived as one

who was completely underwater during the flood. Swollen and rotting timber floors, walls

and ceiling clad this space to show the damage caused by the flood. The lighting is low and

being underground makes the space cold and humid, and allows for no cell phone signal. In

here, it is not possible to communicate with the outside world. One is trapped in a dark,

smelly, scary place.

The second experience space is also located underground, on level -1; this space is the other

one pointed towards the lagoon, and it is purposely unavailable to access, as it is still

flooded. Going down the stairway hallway into this space, the smell of stagnant water strikes

the ambiance and the sound of things floating stops one from moving forward. Curiosity is

tempted as the door is closed and one can only see water coming outside of the room. One

may dare to enter if is not afraid to get their feet wet.

The third experience space can be thought of as the safest place in the building, for it is on

the 1st level, where water did not reach, and pointed towards the city. This space is sort of a

metaphor for the roof of a house during the flood: as the door is closed in this space one is

left alone with no sight of the outside world, except for the sky as this space is open; only

Fig. 91. Study model of the museum

building showing the circulation.

Fig. 90. Study model of the site (real

scale of the museum circulation).

Fig. 92. Conceptual sketch of the

route and experience spaces.

Fig. 93. Conceptual sketch of

the experience spaces.

37

sounds communicate what goes on as the city life continues, and even though one knows it

is safe to be there, it can only wait to be rescued, or in this case, be let out.

The last experience space is at ground floor level, and it points towards the new

neighborhood; a homage, so to speak, to the houses in the old neighborhood, that were

damaged this way: it is meant to be a space that was flooded and it has now recovered.

The smell of all sorts of cleaning and disinfectant supplies is impregnated in the walls, which

make watermarks all around the room, showing how high the flood level rose, seem to be

engraved, as all the cleaning in the world would not erase them. This is the only space with a

window, a connection to the outside world, which overlooks at the new neighborhood now,

but remembers the place where the old one was.

Fig. 94-97. All images drawn by Griselda Arteaga Trejo on Sketchup, May 2011; all images edited by Griselda Arteaga Trejo on

Photoshop, May 2011, and www.picnik.com, August 2011.

All the above mentioned ideas/concepts taken from the narratives of the victims of the

flood, were very helpful in terms of making decisions for the interior of the experience spaces;

trying to achieve an ambiance of fear, insecurity and desperation, was not exactly the aim,

as the purpose of the spaces is not to torture visitors; spaces can have the same impact

without it being a stressful experience. Going from a very big, lit, open space, into a small,

dark, enclosed hallway, to get into a smaller, darker, colder, smelly room, where sounds or

the lack of them accompany one in the experience, should be enough to transmit

something.

Although the thematic of the museum is serious, it is not meant to be a place to leave with a

bad feeling; it is true that the disaster caused by Hurricane Karl was a downer, but the thing

about Mexican culture, moreover, Mexican people, is that they have it in them to find the

positive and the fun side of every situation, no matter how tragic. Embracing this positive

spirit, the museum is decorated with witty sayings on the walls, allusive to the inundation;

lifesavers are placed on hallways where fire extinguishers should go, as it is more likely to

have a flood than a fire; boats hang from the ceiling of the museum, like those on the sides

of cruise ships in case of an emergency; inflatable crocodiles float in the purposely flooded

void at the center of the museum, around which the route goes from one space to the

other, as a parody of the news of crocodiles living in the old neighborhood during the flood.

All these things, which are allusive to the culture and history of Veracruz and the site,

connect the project to its location and help people relate to it, and get a smile out of them.

Fig. 94. Experience Space 1 Fig.95. Experience Space 2 Fig. 96. Experience Space 3 Fig. 97. Experience Space 4

Fig. 98. The phrase on the wall

is a line from „La Bamba‟.

Fig. 99. The lifesaver replaces

the fire extinguisher.

Fig. 100. Boats hang from the

ceiling in case of emergency.

Fig. 101. Beware of the

inflatable crocodiles.

38

Fig. 98-101. All images drawn by Griselda Arteaga Trejo on AutoCAD, May 2011; all images edited by Griselda Arteaga Trejo on

Photoshop, May 2011, and www.picnik.com, August 2011.

By developing this project, all the previously asked questions found their answers. The new

museum building is connected to the place where it stands by alluding at its history and

memories of what happened in it; it reminds people of what happened by letting them

experience in their own skin, the sounds, smells and sights of the event, although only to a

certain extent; visiting the museum, the idea is for people to be more sympathetic of those

who had to live through it, to be supportive of them, and to be grateful for not having to had

experienced it for real.

The experience

This narrative describes the experience as it is intended by the author of the project and the

thesis, once again under the assumption that the project is developed. It starts by spotting

the museum away, and talks the reader through the route of the “experience spaces”,

providing not only an accurate description of the space, but also commenting on the

feelings and thoughts inspired or evoked by the experience.

Walking down the east avenue of the new neighborhood, one can spot the building as soon

as one turns right, not because it is tall or too big, but because there is nothing blocking the

view towards it, as it stands tall on a manmade hill of about three meters high. After walking

along the manmade lagoon, I reach the stairs that lead up to the plaza where the entrance

to the building lays, surrounded by gardens. It is not something spectacular, a square shaped

building of two stories, made of concrete, nothing special.

The entrance is like a tunnel, also of concrete, and it goes all the way in through a glass

façade. On the tunnel entrance there is something that reads “enter at your own risk”, is that

supposed to be a threat? Across the glass façade, exiting the concrete tunnel, I find myself in

a huge lobby like area: the ceiling is as high as the building and there is a lot of light entering

through it. It actually feels kind of warm. There is an unidentified scent in the air, but it is not

very strong, it might be water though, for there is a distant sound of it like bubbling

somewhere inside, plus there is the lagoon right next door.

On the left, there is a big sign on the wall that reads “information”, people there suggest

visitors take the “experience route” before heading upstairs to the actual museum.

Instructions are followed.

At the end of the lobby, there is a handrail that keeps one from falling over, not that it looks

risky as there is water below in some kind of pool, it is like the water from the lagoon. It

confirms the source and reason for the unidentified scent. There are two boats hanging from

the ceiling, a rescue boat and an inflatable banana on the water, makes one wonder why.

Maybe they are part of the exhibition, like a thrill ride on the water below. Below. The building

goes below ground. I would have never guessed that from the views of it outside.

Turning left, the experience part begins, as it says so on the wall: “experience the flood”,

hopefully the water from below will not rise to flood the so called experience spaces. If that

was part of the experience, people should be aware of this.

Going down a set of stairs, one enters inside some kind of tunnel to find more stairs; it gets

darker as I go further down, and it feels like a long way from where I entered the museum. It

also feels colder and there is a funny smell. Finally I reach a door. It is swollen, it is stuck, it is

hard to open it, but it gives in. There is nothing inside the space, though, it is a dead end. The

smell comes from inside the space without a doubt, it is humidity. I stand still for a while

examining the room around me. The walls and the floor look terrible, and they feel wet. It

looks as though this space was underwater, which would explain the smell and the looks of it.

I wish there was a window in here, but then again, this is underground. Being here, I cannot

hear anything, silence is palpable, and it is eerie; makes me feel alone and scared to be

here. It is cold and dark, not a very comfortable space to be in, specially cause of the smell

of wet timber and humidity. Maybe it is time to move on to the next space.

39

Apparently one is supposed to go back the same way one got in, which makes navigation

of the museum easy but unnecessarily long at the same time. Coming back up, I find myself

overlooking at the water again. The route goes around an empty space in the middle of the

building, which has water at the bottom of it. It seems as though as it has gone up since I last

saw it, which is worrying. It is a good thing that that there are lifesavers on the walls to use “in

case of emergency”, funny stuff. No fire extinguishers, only lifesavers. When one is in a place

surrounded by water, fire is probably the last thing in mind.

I spot the funniest thing: “beware of the crocodiles” is written on the wall below the deck

where one is supposed to walk as part of the route, and down in the water, I see three

inflatable crocodiles floating close to the rescue boat and the inflatable banana. This is

definitely to make fun of the fake, dramatic news of crocodiles escaping from a natural

reservoir during the hurricane and temporarily living in the old neighbourhood during the

flood. Good stuff.

The route goes upstairs again, around the space surrounding the water, and then, there is

another left turn. It is back into the tunnel like space and downstairs once more, but this stairs

are not as long as the previous ones. As I go down, the stink of stagnant water hits me and it

only gets worse as I go further down, then it is visible why: there is water coming out of the

room, the space is flooded. As I stand there reasoning what is going on and why the route

guides you to a place that is not accessible, I hear something, it is as though something

keeps hitting the door on the other side, but because it is closed, there is no way to know

what it is or if there is indeed something or God forbid, someone in there. That is both creepy

and scary. This must be like what houses were like during the flood. The thought of walking

down the stairs of my home to find water coming out of the rooms and my things floating

around is unbearable. Having to walk amongst the remains of my belongings in that filthy

water with that hideous smell gives me the creeps. I feel for those who had to do it, for

cannot imagine putting up with it, and cannot bare to stay in this space any longer. Moving

forward.

For once, I experience a sense of relief as I emerge back up, around the water, in a big,

open, lit, warm space that does not smell like rubbish. It was suffocating down there. Keep

walking around the water and turn left again. Apparently, the way into all of the spaces is

through these tunnels, but this time the stairs go up, which will be a nice change.

At the top of the stairs, another closed door. As it is opened, the small space that precedes it

is filled with light, for it is an open space, to the sky anyway. There is nothing inside, just an

empty room, like the one before, but this one is different: there is no funny smell and the walls

and floor look decent enough. Wait, there is a smell, the smell of timber of the walls and the

smell and feel of fresh air, unlike that inside the building. It is a relief to be here. I had not

reflected upon the fact that within the building, the only sounds I could hear were of the

water, or the creepy sound of things banging the door. And here, I can actually listen to the

traffic sounds and people passing by, it makes me feel safe to know that the city is out there,

behind the walls, even if I cannot see it, and that I am not alone in the world.

Heading back down, following the route walking around the water I find myself in front of a

big wall and there is only a left turn to go. The route will probably end in the next space as it

has already gone around the water, and the building. Another tunnel, but it does not have

stairs, only a door at the end. As I open the door, a strong scent hits my nose: it smells very

clean, reminds me of the cleaning products aisle in a supermarket. There is a window at the

end of the room, and it looks at the new neighbourhood. The window implies a connection

to the outside world, although a different one to that in the other space, for this one is visual. I

turn around and see there are lines around the room, all at the same height, they are

watermarks. I go around the room touching them with my hand. Standing next to them,

against the wall, they are as high as my chest. I rub my fist against them, but it does not

make them go away. Seems as though as people have tried to erase them unsuccessfully,

hence the smell of cleaning products. Below the lines, I touch the walls that look in poor

condition, but not nearly as bad as the walls in the first space, these walls are not wet, just

stained; they seem to have been taken care of. Over the lines, the walls seem fine, as

40

though as water did not reach them, they feel even and like those in the previous space, the

one up the stairs. I realize standing there, watermarks at the height of my chest, that the

houses in the old neighbourhood had water up this height, and all I can think is wow.

As I leave the space, I cannot help but feel compassion; moreover because I know people

who were living in the neighbourhood when the flood happened, and it makes me think of

what they had to go through to get their lives back: they had to see their homes underwater,

to navigate amongst the remain of their things in filthy water, and after the water was gone,

to clean exhaustively their homes to be able to move back in, with the constant reminder of

what had happened, thanks to the remaining watermarks. It sure makes one want to help,

and also grateful for not having had to suffer through the real experience of the flood.

41

42

43

44

45

46

Discussion/Analysis

After having developed the architectural project, more recently having carried out a

bibliographical research regarding the topics of experience of space, phenomenology,

perception, memory, and the senses in architecture, and moreover, after conducting the

exercise in which space is explored in a rather unorthodox manner, by trying to separate the

senses to appreciate how important they are individually in the experience of space (see

appendix for exercise and conclusions), it can be said that what was applied in the

architectural project was not entirely wrong.

The eyes are not given more importance than the other senses; the experience of the

museum is multisensory as it uses sounds, smells and different materials to address all the

senses, evoke feelings and create a memorable experience, where the visitors will feel

connected to the victims of the flood, and to the local history of the site, the old

Fraccionamiento Floresta.

The aesthetic aspect of the project is definitely not the main concern, in fact, as described in

the narrative of the space, the form of the building is nothing special. The idea of the cube

manifests itself as a preconception of interior space; looking at the building people will

expect a certain configuration inside, but entering it will be discovered that some things are

not really as they seem. An example of it is the water in the void, which surprises the visitor as

makes one realize the fact that the building goes underground and it does not only have the

two levels people can see from outside.

The transition from the main space, which is the area around the water, described as “a big,

open, lit, warm space that does not smell like rubbish”, to each experience space, happens

through the “tunnels” with stairs that go either up or down. The tunnels, in a way, start

preparing the visitor for what is coming, as they start introducing scents in a subtle way, and

their appearance shifts as visitors approach the rooms in the end. The ambiance changes, as

light and temperature shift, because of the location of the room, but also for the purpose of

each space.

In the different experience spaces, the eyes can see the different levels of damage in the

cladding of the walls, floors and ceilings; the nose can smell the humidity and wet timber, the

stagnant water, the clean air and nature, and the cleaning products; the hand can touch

the wet timber, the body can feel the suffocating atmosphere, the warmth of the sun and

the fresh air, and the fist can try to erase the watermarks on the walls; the ears can hear

silence, the banging of floating objects on the door, the noise of the city and the curiosity of

passersby. All the senses are addressed and stimulated.

The images seen, scents smelled, sounds heard, and things touched, stir and evoke feelings

and memories. For someone who lived through it, the stimuli will most likely bring them back

to that moment; for someone who has never experienced a situation like it, the stimuli will

give them a broad idea of what it must have felt like to be there, and thus, it will make the

person feel sympathetic.

The mudei: museo de la inundación (museum of the inundation) belongs in the place where

the inundation happened; it would not have the strong meaning and connotation it has if it

were placed somewhere else, and people would not feel identified with it. It is not expected

that by touring the museum, people will understand that they are walking around the old

neighborhood in a smaller scale; just as it is not expected for them to understand that the

decisions of the zoning of the area were based on the traffic routes of the old neighborhood.

This does not mean thought that doing that is not a way to integrate the project to its

location.

In trying to do that as well, moreover, in trying to integrate local popular culture, lyrics from

“La Bamba”, a Mexican Folk song originally from Veracruz, are written on the wall, but they

are actually allusive to the slogan of a campaign started by young people, to help those in

need living in the neighbourhood; another attempt at this was the use of inflatable

47

crocodiles which mock the news from sensationalist local newspaper Notiver, which

announced that four hundred crocodiles had escaped and were spotted around the

neighbourhood during the flood.

A way in which the project could be improved, beyond the theme of functionality in the

experience route, is in the incorporation of interactive experiences between the users and

the building; for example, Hayley Anderson, a student at the University of Sheffield in 2009,

designed a project in which flooding was a problem, but it was embraced and incorporated

as part of the use of the building, as she involved the users in the cleaning process, as part of

their own recovery process. This way, the users interact with the building and this experience

is more meaningful as they are more involved.

Other than that, the project overall seems to come across as successful in terms of providing

the users with a memorable experience, or at least a multisensory one, and in making them

feel part of something bigger; if a visually impaired person was to visit the museum, this

person would be able to experience the flood through the sounds, the smells and the

ambiance in the spaces; in the same way, a hearing impaired person could do the same

through sight, smells and touch, and so on; every visitor is able to feel as part of something for

they have now participated in the experience.

According to the definition of architecture, built at the beginning of this thesis, by the fusion

of all the definitions previously acquired: “Architecture is about designing beautiful and

functional spaces for people...” whether the building is beautiful or not, that is not for the

architect to judge, as beauty is subjective, but as it has already been said, it was not the aim

for it to be beautiful; as for functional, that may be the weaker side of the project, having to

go in and out of the spaces through the same way, in what the narrative describes as easy

navigation yet unnecessarily long. “...to be understood, architecture needs to be

experienced...” so much for that, as in order to experience this building it would have to be

built first, but here is to hoping the narrative and the images can help the readers of this

thesis better understand the spaces designed. “...to work in the context where it is

conceived, to incorporate the local popular culture...” the reasons why the project is located

where it is and how it manages to incorporate itself to the context is thoroughly explained

along this thesis, but if the reader fails to understand the humour in certain decisions, then the

project is successful in the incorporation of local popular culture. “...to manipulate and take

advantage of the elements, both natural and architectural, to its favour...” in terms of space

and ambiance manipulation, it is fair to say that the use of materiality in the building aids to

create certain atmospheres, and thus it is believed that the building does a fair job in doing

so, but then again, that would be for the readers to judge. “...and most importantly, it needs

to be able to transmit emotion and be life enhancing...” if by transmitting emotion, the

project automatically becomes life enhancing, then the author shall let the project speak by

itself.

48

Conclusion

What is architecture? Is Who is it for? How is it understood? How is it experienced? How are

the senses involved in the experience of architecture? How is it related to its context? Why

the need to relate it to its context? How does it transmit emotion? What makes a memorable

experience in architecture? These are some of the questions which find an answer along this

thesis.

In a personal exercise, a definition of architecture is established by the author in order to

make a point regarding something discussed in the Introduction of this work, the

misconception of architecture. This misconception is part of what has become a problem

with the practice of the craft, as the emphasis in vision by architects has neglected the other

senses in the experience of architecture, which has only got worse due to the lack of

materiality in contemporary building materials, product of an industrialized world.

Although it is not the aim of the thesis to find a solution for this situation, it sort of works out

that way as this work is trying to understand how architecture is able to transmit emotion to

people, which is discussed in the Literary Review, where the senses of hearing, smelling,

tasting and touching are given as much importance as the sense of sight, and it is explained

how a work of architecture can provide people with a sense of place, and the roll of

memory in the experience of architecture.

The research, which happened by design, is thoroughly explained in the chapter following

the Literary Review; and immediately afterwards, the methodology of the architectural

project is described and explained using the drawings and a fictional narrative of the space,

which in the end help to answer the questions this thesis is asking.

In the chapter, Discussion and Analysis, it is reviewed how right or wrong the findings of the

research by design and the product, the architectural project, are in terms of achieving that

which the established definition of architecture comprehends, and how successful the

project is in terms of actually doing what the thesis is trying to understand; finally, it is

reckoned how the project could have been better and what could be done to improve it.

The importance of this research lies within the fact that architecture is becoming more a

sculptural work of art, rather than a place for people to inhabit, live their lives and share

memorable experiences. As architecture built lacks means to provoke experiences, it

becomes empty and does not help people relate and get a sense of belonging. By

understanding, how memorable experiences can be achieved through architecture, more

architects will aim for that in their designs, and architecture will be more than just “beautiful

buildings”.

It is also important to remember that architecture is the only art form which people can

inhabit, which speaks to its users and makes them feel part of something; it is the

atmosphere, given by the light, resonance of the space, smells and textures of the materials,

which make architecture a sensory experience and it is what these things are capable of

evoking in people, which make architecture a sensitive experience.

Further research should be carried to explore innovative ways in which architecture engages

its users, whether it is through the stimulation of the senses, or through human participation in

creating the environment within buildings.

Only when architects become more aware of the power of the stimulation of all the senses,

stop caring so much for the appearance, and begin to worry about how their work will make

people feel, architecture will become more humane, it will become a memorable

experience.

“If we contemplate architecture in a carping spirit with a know it all

attitude, it will shut itself up and have nothing to say to us. But if we

ourselves are open to impressions and sympathetically inclined, it will

open up and reveal its true essence.“

Experiencing Architecture (Rasmusen, 1989, p. 237)

49

Appendix

Isolating The Senses: Another Personal Exercise

When entering a space people are experiencing it with all the senses, but when asked to

describe it, most of the time they will describe it by what it is seen, more than by what it is

smelled, heard, touched or tasted; but this does not mean they are not perceiving things

with the other senses, cause the thing is, the senses cannot be turned off.

The experience of space through some of the senses happens unconsciously, but when one

really thinks about it, there are so many things people perceive that go beyond what it is

seen and more importantly that are a crucial part of the experience. In order to demonstrate

this, I did a little exercise; I went to a familiar place, one of the studios in the school of

architecture, and tried to describe my experience of the space using ONLY one sense at the

time.

Certain statements are highlighted as they were found interesting for particular reasons, and

immediately afterwards it is explained why. In the end, everything is tied up in a small

conclusion.

I could not start by seeing the place, as doing so would have ruined the other senses for me

because I would have already known how big the space was, what it was used for and what

things I could find in there; so I decided to start by the sense of hearing, following by

smell/taste, touch and finally, sight.

Hearing the architecture studio/Tuesday July 19, 2011/Around 12:00 hrs.

“Sitting in one of the chairs around the working tables in the studio, I close my eyes and pinch

my nose trying to block my senses of sight and smell, I do not intend to touch anything while

sitting here, and I certainly do not intend to taste anything as well. I try to concentrate only

on the sounds produced both inside and outside this space...

The ambiance is calmed, the silence is palpable in the room; it feels as though as I am by

myself even though I know I am not, as I saw a few people on my way inside: there are

about four other people studying in the room next to mine, but I cannot hear them, they

work quietly. After a little while just sitting here, suddenly I hear steps approaching me or at

least the space where I am sitting, but they stop and now I hear water running and a

recipient filling with it; I am not sure whether they are washing something or just pouring a

drink, perhaps the latter. Now I hear a microwave closing and working, which makes me

think they were indeed pouring a drink as they are now heating food. Once it is ready I hear

the steps fade away and someone pulling a chair and after a few seconds, they are

chewing.

The sounds we hear in space can give us an idea of what goes on in it, in this

particular case, the sound of the microwave makes me think of food. As soon as I

hear, I want to smell, and then I start feeling really hungry. The fact that someone is

preparing food to eat, reminds me of the time of the day, it is lunch time and the fact

that there is a microwave in the room, gives me an idea of where I might be, a

kitchen, even though I know I am not in one.

I hear the wind blowing and birds, which I could not hear before, so maybe someone just

opened a window; but now I also hear a loud noise I don not recognize, some kind of

machine is being used outside. Someone is clicking a lot and music begins to play, I think

they did that to block the noise from the machine, which is working because I cannot hear it

as loud anymore. It is a song I recognize, it is in English, and then I hear Chinese girls speaking,

maybe they are talking about the music but I cannot tell because I do not speak Chinese.”

It is not only the sound of the wind blowing or the birds that make me think someone

opened a window, I can actually feel the wind coming inside and it is giving me chills,

making me cold. There is no way to not be aware of the change of the temperature

in the space, once it happens. As soon as I hear, I can feel.

50

Smelling/Tuesday July 19, 2011/Around 13:00 hrs.

“While this space is meant to be experienced only by the sense of smell, I do need to walk

around it and to do so I need to be able to see and touch things at some points, though the

description will be only based on what I smell.

Coming from outside the building, the garden to be precise, the smells I have gone through

to get here are very different: starting with the smell of nature, grass, earth, even flowers and

fresh air; then some kind of scent like that in an elevator, I believe it is the carpet’s smell; I

have to go upstairs to get to the studio space and the first smell I get is paint.

When smelling nature, I can immediately tell I am in an open space, it is not only the

smell, but the ambiance, the air, the temperature. The feeling of being in a big

space, which changes when moving towards the building, and the change of smell

which announces the change of location, also changes the way I feel, now I do not

feel as free as before.

I walk around the space touching here and there in order not to trip or hit myself with

something, as I have my eyes closed at this point. I can smell food and plastic, maybe it is

food in containers, and it is making me hungry, even more. I keep moving and the next smell

I sense is soap and immediately afterwards a very strong scent of coffee, which makes me

think of this really popular restaurant back home in Mexico where my dad has breakfast with

his lifelong friends every saturday morning, and so it reminds me of home. The smell of food

intensifies and I get the impression that someone might be eating very close to me. I am now

starving and craving something to eat.

I find very interesting how the scent of strong coffee has the power to remind me of

my home, as it is a smell I relate to my father, an addict to coffee. The smell of food,

no matter how artificial also reminds me of home cooked meals by my mother and I

cannot help but smile at these thoughts and feel very nostalgic; that is without

mentioning the fact that the smell of food also makes me savour it in my mouth. As

soon as I smell, I remember, and I want to taste.

The next smell I identify is once again natural, a plant, but it is not very strong, could come

from outside or maybe a small plant in the room. I keep moving around and smell

cardboard, maybe a box; I can also smell a pencil and dust which makes me sneeze. Does

not seem to be a very clean place. Then really strong glue and wood, and more of the same

model making materials.”

Clearly the smells I identify although in opposite sides of the space correspond to the

activities taking place in it, cooking and working, which is rather confusing; on one

side there are all those food and drink smells while on the other, the artsy materials; if I

had never been to this place before I would not know where I was standing, whether

a kitchen or a workshop, for these two things do not usually go together. It may seem

quite strange to put a kitchen by an architecture studio, but maybe it was

completely intentional. Students do spend a lot of time in the studios, more so than

they do at home, and in a way, having the familiar smells of food and coffee might

be a way to make them feel closer to home and comfortable enough to work in the

studio for longer periods of time.

Touching/Tuesday July 19, 2011/Around 15:00 hrs.

“First of all I want to get an idea of the shape and size of the space, as the smells and sounds

did not provide that information for me; so I try to go around it feeling it with my hands, but it

is hard as there are many things adjacent to the walls and blocking my way. I know it is a big

space and it is not regular, it has more than four walls and a big entrance with no door. To

measure the height, I stand and lift my arms up, but I cannot feel anything above me, so I try

jumping without luck; I then decide to stand on something and repeat the process, this time

reaching the ceiling with my fingers when jumping, so I decide the space is not very high.

51

As I run my hands on the walls I feel different surfaces, bricks without a finish as they feel quite

rough, tiles, then bricks with a finish, I am thinking paint. I find what I think is a window, from

the level difference on the wall, the frame and the temperature of the surface, which is

cooler than the previous one. Another wall felt different, as though as it had things stuck to it,

like little bumps I could remove and some I could not; bits of tape stuck to my hand when

caressing the wall and I could feel pieces of paper stuck to it in some parts.

What is so interesting about this experience is how when touching things I

immediately felt the urge to experience them with other senses, I felt the different

textures of the wall and window, the different temperatures and instantly tapped on

them attempting to hear the different sounds they would produce just to be sure that

they were indeed different materials, as I could not see; as soon as I touched, I

wanted to hear.

I ran my hands around the space again, but this time trying to feel the things blocking my

way before. When approaching I hit something with my foot, so I kneel down to touch it and

realize it is some kind of bucket: I put my hand inside it and feel something hard, so I press

and it disintegrates leaving nothing but dust between my fingers.

In this case, the same thing happened, when I touched it and it disintegrated, I

wanted to smell it as I could not recognize what it was by only touching it, and I

wanted to taste it as its texture reminded me of the kind of biscuit that does that as

well. As soon as I touched, I wanted to smell and taste.

I find some kind of table, but it is tall and it feels smooth and cold, passing my hand over the

surface I feel crumbles and it also feels a little sticky; I then lift my hand in disgust and hit it

with something above: sensing it I realize it is a door, so it must be a cabinet. Moving on I find

what feels like a sink so I reach for the faucet and wash the dust and crumbles off my hands

to keep touching whatever is around: I find plates and bowls, but I am not putting my hands

inside them in case they are dirty. I continue to move along what feels like a kitchen bar and

finally hit a wall. Immediately then I find a window which is open as I now feel a bit of wind in

my face, entering and chilling the room. Now I find a big piece of furniture that feels really

cold and heavy, as I cannot move it; it has several drawers for what I can feel, very long but

not as deep, which are resistant to me pulling to open them.

When I approach the window and feel the wind in my face, I can immediately smell

the leaves outside, even though I am not supposed to experience the space with

other senses.

Now a drawing table, there are bits of thick cardboard on it I rather not touch; another

drawing table and as I put my hand on it I feel what could be a small model, so I grab it and

carefully touch different bits of it feeling different materials on it, something smooth, then

something rough, something fluffy, and I put it back.

Yet another drawing table and I grab a zipper... it might be a piece of luggage but it is not

very thick so maybe a portfolio case, it has sheets on top of it, but different kinds as some feel

more fragile than others. Another drawing table and I lift something small of it, put it back

and find another and another, they feel like little study models and they are shaped

differently and made of different materials. I hit a wall again.

I have reached the wall with the tiny bumps and I hit my lower leg; as I reach around with my

arms I find nothing around me so I kneel down to see what I hit myself with. I find a table with

something on it, I reach carefully and find a small box which I lift to find it is not heavy at all,

and I put it back. I reach under the table and find a cable, so I follow it with my hands to see

where it leads me to. It belongs to an extension lying on a table. I run my hands on it and feel

and edge, then another table. The surfaces are not smooth, they have cuts all over, some

deeper than others, and they have hard bumps as well. I follow the edge and find a

different surface, another table a bit shorter, which is not damaged like these two. It is very

smooth and one can barely feel its texture of tiny stripes. Finally I bump into a chair around it.

52

Touching the bumps on the walls and the cuts on the surface of the working tables,

as weird as it may seem, provoke sensations in my mouth and I want to touch them

with my tongue, taste them, feel the depth or the roughness, but I do not do it. As

soon as I touch, I want to taste.

Seeing/Tuesday July 19, 2011/Around 16:00 hrs.

“Sitting in one of the chairs around the working tables in the studio, I start looking around me,

and although I am not in a completely enclosed place, I start feeling wrapped in space as I

look up at the ceiling, which I had never really noticed before, the walls and through the

windows...

There are so many things around me that it is hard to know where to begin... I go with what I

now know is indeed a kitchen bar: there are cabinets above it which are symmetrically

aligned to it, they are all white, just like the walls. I guess this is a deliberate decision in order

to make them go unnoticed as it is after all an architecture studio and a kitchenette is out of

context. On the bar rests the figure of a cow which is actually a piggy bank, weird place for

a piggy bank if you ask me. Further down on the bar, there is a sink and washing liquid that is

either half full or half empty; there is a plate in the sink that has not been washed and a

bunch more plates and bowls that are waiting to be put away or used by someone else,

some of which are stained by their use. There is also a microwave spatter with only God

knows how many different kinds of food, and a couple of teapots and coffee makers resting

by the plates. Under the bar, two empty bins. Looks as if nobody has used the kitchen in a

while.

I think it is actually harder to describe the space you are looking at as there are so

many things you would not be able to notice if you were not looking at them, like the

colour of the walls or the existence of the piggy bank. On the other hand, a

description based on what is only seen at the moment, can be deceiving; I know

because I was here earlier, that the kitchen has been used, but the fact that the bins

are empty gives the impression that it has not.

Also I think it is interesting how after seeing certain things assumptions are made for

the reasons these things are the way they are.

The food stains on the plates and the microwave, make me want to smell them; as

soon as I see, I want to smell.

In the middle of the room there are four tables put together that form one big table; they are

not dining tables though, more like working tables and desks, two of each. They seem to be

made of wood but different kinds of it, I think this is due to their use: surely the desks are used

for drawing and the working tables for more crafty activities as one can see the cuts and

stains of paint and glue on them.

The cuts and bumps on the working tables are one of those things that when seen,

make me want to touch them, feel their depth, their texture, and maybe even try to

rip them off the surface. As soon as I see, I want to touch.

Behind the tables, adjacent to the walls there are four drawing tables with loads of things on

each of them: paper sheets, pieces of cardboard, rests of wood, parts of study models and

models in progress, images and drawings as well as different tools to work with all of these

materials.

The very existence of these materials on the drawing tables makes me want to grab

them between my hands, feel their textures, look at them more closely and try to

understand what they are or how they work. As soon as I see, I want to touch.

Yet another table with a big board over it, where a map has been printed. It looks as though

as it may have been a model of a city as there are rests of “buildings” laying around out of

place, as if some kind of creature had destroyed them.

53

My eye catches a piece of wood on the floor and then a bunch more other stuff next to it

and under the above mentioned table; there are as many things laying on the floor as there

are on top of the drawing tables, but these things seem dirty and useless, they are written or

drawn on, full of dust and rubbish: torn apart or damaged study models, boxes with leftover

materials such as cardboards, wood and polystyrene, stained recipients with a mixture that

hardened with time that now contains paintbrushes.

I know what the content of the bucket is because I can see it, and nonetheless I have

the urge to touch it, feel it within my fingertips and maybe even smell it. As soon as I

see, I want to touch and smell.

The walls are white but they are stained by the rests of blue tack used to stick things to them;

they look like moles or scars left by the chicken pox. Rests of different kinds of tape hang from

the walls or have remained stuck to it becoming part of the wall itself. A few images remain

as the decorations of the space in relation to the theme of the studio while others are the

product of the work developed during the school year.

The bumps I see on the wall, just like the bumps and scars on the table tickle my

fingertips which cannot wait to caress the stained and bumpy surface. As soon as I

see, I want to touch.

There are three windows in this space: through one of them one can see a part of the

building that this space is part of. Through the other windows the connection is with nature as

trees and vegetation that seem to wrap around the space and do not let much light come

in, are all that is visible. Through the windows one can see the leaves of the trees move and

on the building across, the shadows they project. It must be windy outside.

With sight we can perceive movement of bodies, and that is how I can tell it is windy

outside; we can also perceive the pass of time, by the change in the shadows

projected on the building next door.

In the middle of the two windows that look at nature there is a massive piece of furniture that

looks like a drawer chest; another place on top of which people can pile things that get in

their way, and where drawers have name tags of the people who during the year used the

space and made it their own.”

Conclusion

Every time I was trying to describe the space with only one sense, I realized there is absolutely

no way to disconnect the others; it would happen naturally and unconsciously, but the fact

of the matter is I ended up experiencing the space in more than one way simultaneously:

when I was seeing the kitchen bar, I could not help but wanting to touch each of the

materials; when smelling the microwave, I could not help but wanting to taste whatever had

just been heated in it; when smelling the coffee, I could not help but thinking of home; when

hearing the wind blowing I could not help but feeling chills; when touching the models I

could not help but wanting to see what they were made off, and so on.

I realized that when experiencing a space, with one or with all the senses, we try to provide

explanations for the things we experience, we make assumptions or come up with reasons to

understand why things are the way they are, when this is not explained to us, and this

assumptions, reasons and explanations are based on our personal experiences; we relate

what we are seeing, hearing, touching, smelling and tasting, with things that are familiar to

us, things we know and memories. In a way, this connects us to the experience.

Also, I realized, even though each separate sense can give you an idea of what is going on

in there, each sense provides different types of information. This information may coincide

sometimes: by sight, hearing, touching, smelling and tasting, I could tell there was a

kitchenette there; but the truth of the matter is, that In order to provide an accurate

description of the place, I would have to include not only what I saw, but also what I heard,

touched/felt, smelled and tasted, when experiencing the space. This only reaffirms the

importance of addressing all the senses in the experience of space.

54

Chronicles of an Unannounced Inundation: Part 1

By Mirna Elizabeth Ruiz Escobar

On Friday September 17 of 2010, hurricane Karl stroke the port of Veracruz. Despite this, the

day went by relatively calmed. Real trouble began the next day, when personal of the

Mexican army warned the inhabitants of Puente Moreno and Arboleda San Ramon

neighbourhoods, located in Medellin de Bravo, that it was imperative for them to evacuate

their homes since the Puente Moreno stream, which lies within said neighbourhoods had

overflowed. As it is natural, most people paid no attention to this warning: some for

incredulity, others from distrust, and the rest because they were afraid to leave their homes

and become victims of theft.

My family and I were home, in the Floresta neighborhood, which is well known for its

inevitable floods during raining season, when my mother got a call from her sister in law

saying they were trapped in their house because a couple of trees had fallen during the

hurricane. The trees were blocking access to the house and had burst the electricity cables

and water pipes, so they had no electricity, no water and no phone; their only mean of

communication was a cell phone for as long as its battery lasted.

To top that up, one of her daughters with a high risk pregnancy was evacuated from her

home in Puente Moreno, and that‟s when movilization began for us. I was sleeping and my

mother woke me up and presented me with all these information, asked me to go see if my

aunt was ok and if they needed anything, and also to try and convince my cousin to stay

with us instead as in her condition was not safe to be in that isolated place.

Then my sister got a call from her boyfriend who also lives in Puente Moreno, who said he was

coming to our house because in fact the stream had overflowed and Puente Moreno was

under water. It was four in the afternoon and we were listening to the news broadcast on the

radio, waiting for instructions or information. Suddenly, neighbours started saying that the

rivers had overflowed and that in order to avoid a flood in other neighbourhoods they‟d

send the water towards our own. This had happened before, but my street had ever been

flooded, so we took minimal precaution: put the living room on top of bricks, the dinning

chairs on top of the table, and brought a few things up to the second floor. While we were

doing this, panic began to spread, so we decided to grab a change of clothes and leave

the house around five thirty in the afternoon.

My sister was the first to leave the house in my father‟s car, and I followed her with my dog

after ten minutes, while my parents stayed behind. The scene was chaotic: there were huge

lines to exit the neighbourhood, water had begun to flood the main streets, and cellphone

lines were saturated which made communication impossible. We had agreed to go to my

mother‟s sister‟s house, but I had to drop my dog at my grandmother‟s house first. When I got

there I tried calling my sister who was at the boarder of a nervous breakdown because she

couldn‟t get in touch with my parents. I tried to contact them but it was useless, so I dropped

the dog and went to meet my sister.

When we were together, my mother called us and said she and my father were headed to

the red cross, a small clinic, because my father had a strong pain in his injured leg. My sister

wanted to go with them, but there was no point. We stayed at my aunt‟s house and waited

for them to return, which happened many hours later.

Through the rest of the afternoon we kept getting information from all kinds of sources; we

learned that a few of our neighbours had stayed behind, but because water had reached

one meter to one meter and a half high, the army had entered the neighbourhood in boats

and helicopters to evacuate them.

When my parents got home around eleven at night, we were all exhausted and mortified for

what had happened, but we sat together to have dinner and talk. My sister‟s boyfriend

called me to go upstairs to meet him and my sister, and when I did I found my sister crying

and in the middle of a panic attack because she had been looking at pictures from friends

who also lived in our neighbourhood, where the water reached the roofs of some houses. I

55

tried to calm her down with no success and decided to leave her alone. I then had to spend

the night at a friend‟s house since my aunt‟s place was full.

On Sunday, september 19, news and information kept flowing. When I woke up, I turned the

TV on and started looking at the images of the devastated areas, it was shocking, never

before had we seen something like that happen in our town: complete neighbourhoods

under water, people trapped on the roof of their homes, people walking with water up their

waists or chests in some cases. I wanted to be with my family right away, so I headed back to

my aunt‟s house.

Chaos was reigning there since there were three families who had been affected by the

flood, including mine and excluding the family that actually lived there. We began to

organize the contingency plan, went to buy food and water since according to the

authorities there‟d be a lack of potable water, and we put gas on every car we had.

Came Monday, still in a state of alert, school was suspended and many people missed work.

People who had been affected by the flood had to sign up at the World Trade Center where

the State Government was providing support for the victims.

My sister‟s boyfriend went home to get valuable belongings and clothes but did say it was

practically impossible to go in: it was still flooded and the only way to get in was either

walking or through the special vehicles that PEMEX had provided. She also contacted some

neighbours who said they had been waiting in line since seven in the morning in order to

have one of the army boats take them home to collect things they needed.

Tuesday went by with no special news.

On Wednesday, I was determined to go home to get a few things, so I asked my sister‟s

boyfriend to come with me. Around noon, my aunt called me and said one of her friends

was in one of the neighbourhood‟s entrance, letting people use his jet sky to go inside. When

we got there, there was a huge crowd waiting for a chance to go inside, and whole lot of

people altruistically lending their boats and jet skies for people to do so. It was sad on one

side to see all the devastation but very nice to see all those people trying to help others.

So we took the jet sky and ventured into the neighbourhood. We saw cars and vans

underwater, water inside homes, trees floating on what used to be streets, and even people

on roofs afraid to leave their homes to become victims of theft. When we got to the house,

got off the jet sky and water was up to our waists. We tried to open the door but it was stuck,

so my sister‟s boyfriend climbed through the side wall to the roof and tried to get in through

the back. Since we couldn‟t open the door from the inside either, i had to climb and get

inside through the roof. As I was going down the stairs this stinking smell invaded the place. I

seem to have forgotten to mention the neighbourhood was flooded by black waters, it was

practically black. As I reached the first floor I started to stumble upon unrecognizable

objects; first thing I did was to cut the power and gas, opened the windows and looked

around to evaluate the damage.

Afterwards, I went to my parents‟ bedroom to get a few things for them, but had to ask my

sister‟s boyfriend to help with that because the bed‟s headboard was destroyed and had

pushed the bed against the closet, making it impossible for me to open it. We both lifted the

headboard, pushed the bed which was extremely heavy because the mattress was full of

water; I started getting clothes out to bring to the second floor, while my sister‟s boyfriend

was doing the same in her room. We finished packing things about an hour later and started

bringing some things upstairs. Called the jet sky guy when we were done to have him pick us

up and take us back where my sister was waiting for us.

We got back to my aunt‟s house, packed, filthy, stinky and starved. We ate and took a long

shower, but exhausted as we were, had to organize and accommodate everything we had

brought back. The rest of the day and couple of days that followed went by irrelevantly; we

were just waiting for the water to go down to be able to return home, praying to God to take

care of it because robbery was at the order of the day.

56

Finally, it was within the week that we were able to enter our home by foot, water was gone

and all accesses were free, but the history doesn‟t end here; it was just beginning...

It is truly demoralizing going inside your home and see that it‟s all covered in mud, floor and

walls stained by it, furniture destroyed and practically everything lost. Nevertheless you have

to try to keep your head held high and see ahead. It was all up to me to begin the cleaning

duties, since my mom had to work, my dad was injured and my sister was back in school. I

had to remove all garbage, most things were unrecognizable, furniture upside down, the

fridge was lying on the floor, paper and cardboard everywhere. I had to take the furniture

outside, which I have no idea to this day how I did that or where I got the strength from

because I did it by myself.

And so the cleaning duty began that day and went on for weeks, from seven in the morning

to eight every night, we‟d come home to clean, wash, and disinfect floors, walls, furniture,

etcetera and the more we cleaned, the more we couldn‟t see the end of it. The house was

uninhabitable for a month, so we continued to stay with my aunt for a month and eating at

her house for another month since we had no kitchen.

In the end we were able to save the stove, the fridge and washer, but many things like the

living room, the bedrooms and mattresses were destroyed. It was very hard work for several

days which by the end of each my body couldn‟t resist anymore and I had to take a

powerful muscular relaxer in order to deal with all the pain. Physical pain summed to

desperation, impotence and sadness made each day harder to go on, but we carried on,

thanking to be alive, together and to have saved my dog, the cars and a few other

appliances.

It‟s been almost four months since this tragedy occurred and to this day the work goes on:

the walls are still stained and we are still missing furniture; we just have the basics because we

lack the time and the money, but little by little we‟ve been able to move on, although the

road is still long.

The SEDESOL (Secretary of Social Development) dependent of the Federal Government was

the institution in charge of providing help through the repartition of vouchers worth 10,000

pesos (500 pounds) to victim families. Representatives from this institution went house by

house registering and evaluating the damages. Vouchers were exchangeable in local

convenient stores, but were very limited and policies varied from place to place.

The army, beyond helping got in the nerves of people. You had to wait in line for hours in

order to have access to one of the boats, then you had 15 minutes to get in and bring what

you needed back out, which wasn‟t enough time. When I went in with the jet sky, I saw many

boats with no civilians, and men from the military supposedly doing safety rounds. I sadly

manifest that the army forces‟ performance during this situation was disappointing.

Another thing that created major chaos was the gossip spread by some people about how

the government wanted to buy the neighborhood: they were going to go house by house

estimating the house‟s value and according to the results they would offer to buy your house.

Another rumour stated that the neighbourhood wasn‟t flooded by the forces of nature but

because they were trying to avoid a luxurious neighbourhood to be flooded, on decision by

the government. Rumours about crocodiles and rewards of thousands of pesos for catching

them were let out as well.

There was a meeting of all the people living in my neighbourhood, where hundreds, possibly

thousands of people gathered at the World Trade Center, where the state governor was, the

Lic. Fidel Herrera Beltrán; after hours of waiting for him to come out, people were becoming

impatient. Inside the building, there were mostly people with influences, I got in with my mom

with the help of a good friend who happens to work there. When the governor finally came

out, security was minimal. People outside was already starting to push against the glass walls

and inside panic was beginning to spread for people feared for their security as it seemed as

though the glasses were going to break if people kept pushing. The governor then allowed

57

people to get inside, which made most people who were already inside decide to retreat

due to safety concerns.

Finally I only would like to add how I‟ll be forever grateful for the support of many family

members and friends.

Chronicles of an Unannounced Inundation: Part 2

By Lorena Carranza de la Parra

It is very well known that hurricane season in Veracruz begins in August and ends in

November. Usually the authorities announce through the media the category of each

hurricane and the place where it will impact. Thank God, very few times a hurricane has

actually reached the coasts of Veracruz, because of the shape and location of the state,

although we are not exempt of a tropical storm hitting us, as hurricanes Gilberto and Wilma

have proven in the past.

Civil Protection is the institution in charge of keeping the citizens informed about the different

safety measures that need to be taken in case of a sinister and only the state governor can

suspend school and work activity if the circumstances call for it. This happens at least once a

year in Veracruz due to the strong winds that strike the coasts, which in more than one

occasion have generated panic and paranoid shopping sprees among the inhabitants of

the city, but hurricane Karl was the exception. Being so used to the exaggerated precaution

measures from the authorities, the population paid no attention to Civil Protection‟s

instructions, and we simply expected another strong wind.

The first hours of the 17 of september passed as any other day. It was rainy but not windy. The

arrival of the hurricane wasn‟t the most talked about topic of the day, since there were no

clues as to where it would impact. All people talked about was the parade and multiple

concerts taking place in Mexico City due to the Bicentennial of the Independence of the

country, we were never prouder of being Mexicans, than in those days. At around ten in the

morning, winds began to strike at 185 km/h and at half past eleven the hurricane touched

the ground north of the port of Veracruz and continued its journey towards the inner state,

becoming weak until turning into a tropical depression.

They say “after the storm comes the calm” and that‟s what everyone was hoping for, that‟s

why we never saw it coming. The morning after Karl impacted the day was bright and the

sun was shining, not a cloud in the sky, it was the perfect day to go to the beach. Because

Karl kept going on towards the mountains of the state, it generated lots of rain in those areas,

provoking the overflow of several rivers, streams and channels.

That afternoon, the authorities announced that several neighbourhoods withing the city and

other towns close to it needed to be evacuated and by eight o‟clock that night, many of

this were underwater due to the overflow of rivers Jamapa and Cotaxtla.

There‟s no way to describe the mood of the entire population the days that followed the

contingency, even if you had not been affected by the flood, you most certainly knew

someone, friend or family that was a victim: people who lost EVERYTHING from night to

morning, who never imagined the level of water would reach and cover their entire homes.

There were some lucky ones who had family they could stay with, but the less fortunate had

no choice but to go to the shelters provided throughout the state.

One of the biggest shelters was at the World Trade Center, which was already hosting

people from Tlacotalpan, a city that is Cultural Heritage of Humanity and had been flooded

for about a month due to incisive rain.

Personally, I am very proud to be Mexican and like I said, during this month the feeling

reigned in the entire nation for the festivities of the Mexican Independence, but the biggest

pride I felt was on Sunday September 19, when the population voluntarily joined and went to

the shelters to help people that had lost everything in a matter of hours. Help came from

within the whole country: Monterrey, Guadalajara, Puebla, and Mexico City to name a few.

58

During the first days, the shelters were pure chaos, because Civil Protection wasn‟t telling the

volunteers what they had to do and most people ended up just doing what they thought

was more convenient. The society founded different storing centers for supplies because

there was this rumour that the governor was taking responsibility for all the help coming from

outside the state, in order to help his campaign towards the presidency of the country.

Government did provide help in the form of vouchers for people to buy supplies to start over,

although the amount distributed wasn‟t enough for much.

The Floresta and Flores del Valle neighbourhoods are often affected by rain due to the fact

that they were built on a zone of mangrove swamps. The authorities presented a plan to buy

both neighbourhoods and turning it into a lagoon and park. They still haven‟t reached an

agreement, and honestly I doubt they ever will, because there are people who aren‟t thrilled

about the idea and refuse to abandon the homes they built with such effort which are their

children patrimony.

Chronicles of an Unannounced Inundation: Part 3

By Pamela Rodríguez Preciado

During the hurricane nothing really happened. For me, it was another strong wind with a lot

of rain.

I was home the next day and everything was calmed. Around noon people were saying that

water had reached “Flores del Valle”, but the way it always did cause that area usually gets

flooded when it rains, so nobody worried too much.

It wasn‟t until four in the afternoon that the alerts began. They told people to evacuate, but

only people who lived in the middle of the neighbourhood and those avenues that always

get flooded.

In the evening, around seven at night, the marines came saying we had to evacuate

because water was reaching our street and they were gonna cut the power. I live one block

from one of the main avenues of the neighbourhood and the amount of cars and traffic at

the time was impressive. Despite this I was pretty calmed because my street had never been

flooded and all the houses in the block were built over one meter above street level,

because people were aware that something like this could happen. Thank you people, this

saved us.

When I left home, my parents were talking to the neighbours and evaluating the situation.

Many people didn‟t want to leave because there had been a lot of reports of robbery within

the area in houses that people had evacuated earlier. My mother met me and my brother

later that night with everything she could get in the car, like valuables and important

documents. My father stayed behind watching the house, as did some of our neighbours. By

this time, the power was out and the water had completely covered the park in the corner

of my block.

At about three in the morning my father called us. Water had reached the sidewalk and

kept going up, but he didn‟t think it would reach the interior of our house. He called again at

seven in the morning for us to pick him up. As we got there, we weren‟t allowed inside the

neighbourhood and we had to leave the car just outside of it. The image we got getting

there was the most frightful thing I‟ve seen in my life, everything covered in water, it was

impressive. To get to my house I had to walk and water was up to my knees, but as I kept

going forward it went down because my house is built up. When we reached my dad water

had gone down a bit.

The following days were all about monitoring, there still was no power and little by little water

kept going down. Four days after everything happened I went back home and the smell was

dreadful. It smelled like a swamp, mud, like rubbish. It was impressive to see everyone

bringing stuff out of their homes and as you were entering the neighbourhood you were able

to see how far and high the water had reached.

59

Now everything seems to have gone back to normal, but just in appearance. Humidity is

filtering everywhere, the texturized walls of my home are falling apart, the walls of the patio

are turning black, the tiles in some rooms are lifting and breaking, I guess it‟s because the

ground is moving.

60

Bibliography

Blesser, Barry & Salter, Linda-Ruth. (2007) “Spaces Speak, Are you Listening? Experiencing

Aural Architecture”. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Bloomer, Kent C., and Moore, Charles W. (1979) “Body, Memory and Architecture”. Yale

University Press, Great Britain.

Discover Magazine. (n.d) “Found: A Possible Link Between Emotional Memories & Sensory

Triggers”, 2011. Http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2010/08/06/found-a-possible-

link-between-emotional-memories-sensory-triggers/

Eshelman, Sarah; Medwid, Stephanie; Neumann, Laura; and Woroczuk Julia. (n.d) Scent and

Memory. “Olfaction and Memory”, 2011.

Http://www.macalester.edu/psychology/whathap/ubnrp/smell/memory.html

Findeli, A. B. (2008). “Research Through Design and Transdisciplinarity: A Tentaive Contribution

to the Methodology of Design Research”. August, 2011. Http://5-10-

20.ch/~sdn/SDN08_pdf_conference%20papers/04_Findeli.pdf

Frayling, C. (1993). “Research into Art & Design”. London: Royal College of Art.

Gibson, James J. (1966) “The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems”. Houghton Mifflin,

Boston, MA, USA.

Holl, Stephen; Pallasma, Juhani, and Pérez Gómez, Alberto. (1994); “Questions of Perception,

Phenomenology of Architecture”. Architecture and Urbanism, Special Issue.

Lehman, María Lorena (n.d) Memory in architecture. “Designing a sense of place, don‟t

forget memory”, 2011. Http://sensingarchitecture.com/581/designing-a-sense-of-place-dont-

forget-memory/

Lehman, María Lorena (n.d) Memory in architecture. “What is the role of human memory in

architecture”, 2011. Http://sensingarchitecture.com/1328/what-is-the-role-of-human-

memory-in-architecture/

Lehman, María Lorena (n.d) Memory in architecture. “Your building design can trigger

profound occupant emotional memory”, 2011. Http://sensingarchitecture.com/5321/your-

building-design-can-trigger-profound-occupant-emotional-memory/

Lehman, María Lorena (n.d) Scent in architecture. “Designing for smell and memory is highly

effective”, 2011. http://sensingarchitecture.com/2242/designing-for-smell-and-memory-is-

highly-effective/

Lehman, María Lorena (n.d) Scent in architecture. “Tapping into your occupant‟s sense of

smell”, 2011. Http://sensingarchitecture.com/2202/tapping-into-your-occupant%E2%80%99s-

sense-of-smell/

Lehman, María Lorena (n.d) Scent in architecture. “The power of scent for architectural

design”, 2011. Http://sensingarchitecture.com/4600/the-power-of-scent-for-architectural-

design/

Lehman, María Lorena (n.d) Sound in architecture. “Should you add sound to your building

design”, 2011. Http://sensingarchitecture.com/2026/should-you-add-sound-to-your-building-

design/

Lehman, María Lorena (n.d) Sound in architecture. “Using sound to influence architectural

experience”, 2011. http://sensingarchitecture.com/443/using-sound-to-influence-

architectural-experience/

Lehman, María Lorena (n.d) Touch in architecture. “How do you use texture in architectural

design”, 2011. Http://sensingarchitecture.com/1470/how-do-you-use-texture-in-architectural-

design/

61

Lehman, María Lorena (n.d) Touch in architecture. “Maximizing the sense of touch in

adaptive architecture”, 2011. Http://sensingarchitecture.com/2469/maximizing-the-sense-of-

touch-in-adaptive-architecture/

Pallasmaa, Juhani. (2005) “The Eyes Of The Skin, Architecture and the senses”. Wiley-

Academy, England.

Pallasmaa, Juhani. (2009) “The Thinking Hand, Existential and Embodied Wisdom in

Architecture”. John Wiley & Sons, United Kingdom.

Rasmussen, Steen Eiler. (1989) “Experiencing Architecture”. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Wisten, Eva (2010) Scent in architecture. “Scent as Design”, 2011.

http://seedmagazine.com/content/article/scent_as_design/