Meeting lille decembre 2013
-
Upload
agence-urbanisme-lehavre-estuaireseine -
Category
Small Business & Entrepreneurship
-
view
75 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Meeting lille decembre 2013
Partner logo(s) go here Delete this box and place partner logo(s) here on the master page
• WEASTFlows partnership meeting
Lille 12th December of 2013
Action 1 – Infrastructure assessment
Partner logo(s) go here Delete this box and place partner logo(s) here on the master page
Partner logo(s) go here Delete this box and place partner logo(s) here on the master page
Reminder on key objectives
of deliverable 2
Application form A1:
• Analysis of the sustainability of the existing
transport axis
• Analysis of the potential connections/
synergies between the partners regions
considering their economic features and logistics
flows
Partner logo(s) go here Delete this box and place partner logo(s) here on the master page
Methodology
Work based on GIS technology :
• Grid methodology Cross analysis of the GIS infrastructure database
• Identification, selection and analysis of indicators to characterize the sustainability of north-west european freight transport infrastructures
Quantitative analysis of infrastructure
• Cross analysis of Action 2 and Action 4 results (level of use and flows analysis)
Actions 2 and 4 results’s analysis
Partner logo(s) go here Delete this box and place partner logo(s) here on the master page
Focus on deliverable 2 –
The grid analysis
Partner logo(s) go here Delete this box and place partner logo(s) here on the master page
Methodology
Work based on GIS technology :
What is a grid analysis?
• Grid methodology Cross analysis of the GIS infrastructure database
From a NUTS3 division… …to a grid
A division on squares of
800 km² (about 500 miles)
corresponding to the area
of the smallest german
Nuts3.
Partner logo(s) go here Delete this box and place partner logo(s) here on the master page
Advantages and aims of a grid
analysis : weastflows case
GR
ID A
NA
LYSI
S ADVANTAGES
Transcend administrative boundaries
Provide an homogeneous data repository
Allow to compare and combined easily the data
AIMS
Show the infrastructures concentrations
Pre-identified bottlenecks
Highlight the continuities and discontinuities of the infrastructure network
Make the cross data analysis easier
Partner logo(s) go here Delete this box and place partner logo(s) here on the master page
Grid analysis : first results
Inland waterways concentration
Partner logo(s) go here Delete this box and place partner logo(s) here on the master page
Grid analysis : first results
Railways concentration
Partner logo(s) go here Delete this box and place partner logo(s) here on the master page
Grid analysis : first results
Roads concentration
Partner logo(s) go here Delete this box and place partner logo(s) here on the master page
Focus on deliverable 2
Quantitative analysis
Partner logo(s) go here Delete this box and place partner logo(s) here on the master page
Methodology
Work based on GIS technology :
Why define indicators?
To complete the map approach with quantitative data
To compare and analyze the area of interest with objective data
To highlight objectively strengths and shortcomings of the network
in terms of sustainability
For which area?
North West Europe area
Regional level (areas of interest)
• Identification, selection and analysis of indicators to characterize the sustainability of north-west european freight transport infrastructures
Quantitative analysis of infrastructure
Partner logo(s) go here Delete this box and place partner logo(s) here on the master page
Methodology for indicators
selection
• The starting points to define and select the indicators are:
• the suitability of the indicators to highlight the potential
sustainability (or not) of the existing infrastructure network
• the atlas map
• the availability and the accessibility of the data in the GIS
(easy to collect and easy to load)
Partner logo(s) go here Delete this box and place partner logo(s) here on the master page
Partnership work
Step 1: Dublin workshop: presentation and discussion about a first
selection of indicators
Step 2: feedback from partners strongly involved in Action 1 (MWRA,
LOOM, Mobycon, SEStran, TUDOR) to highlight:
• The lack of indicators regarding the first selection
• The relevancy of the indicators selected
Step 3: AURH finalization of the indicators list
Partner logo(s) go here Delete this box and place partner logo(s) here on the master page
Indicators synthesis
Type of object Analysis objectives Indicators
Network (inland waterway,
railway, road)
• Accessibility and connexion • Continuities and
discontinuities • Infrastructure gauge
• Part of main european network (TEN-T) • Network electrification • Part of motorways, dual carriageway and
freeway (roads) • Number of lanes (roads) • Load gauge (railways) • Number of tracks (railways) • CEMT class (inland waterways) • Number of locks (inland waterways)
Nodes (Airport, port,
railway terminal)
• Accessibility and connexion • Intermodality
• Level of intermodality • Accessibility to strategic network (road,
railways and inland waterways) • Numbers of major european nodes • Ferry connexions (port nodes)
Partner logo(s) go here Delete this box and place partner logo(s) here on the master page
Example of area of interest’s identity
card
Partner logo(s) go here Delete this box and place partner logo(s) here on the master page
Next step
Work based on GIS technology :
Work on progress:
Reception of Loom and SEStran data’s
Implementation in the GIS Database
Next step:
Crossing and analysis of the data
• Cross analysis of Action 2 and Action 4 results (level of use and flows analysis)
Actions 2 and 4 results’s analysis
Partner logo(s) go here Delete this box and place partner logo(s) here on the master page
• Grid methodology - finalized Cross analysis of the GIS infrastructure database
• Identification and selection of indicators to characterize the north-west europe freight transport infrastructures – on process
Quantitative analysis of infrastructure
• Cross analysis of Action 2 and Action 4 results (level of use and flows analysis) – to pursue
Actions 2 and 4 results’s analysis
Work on progress
Partner logo(s) go here Delete this box and place partner logo(s) here on the master page
October 2013 : new TEN-T map
Partner logo(s) go here Delete this box and place partner logo(s) here on the master page
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION
The AURH team:
Juliette Duszynski, [email protected]
Lucile Audièvre, [email protected]
Mathilde Mus, [email protected]
Jean-François Mary, [email protected]
Think to visit and to subscribe our blog to be inform
about AURH activities in Weastflows:
http://www.aurhinweastflows.com/
Geoweastflows: http://geoweastflows.eu