Mechanisms of foliar uptake of plant nutrients: Accomplishments and prospects
Transcript of Mechanisms of foliar uptake of plant nutrients: Accomplishments and prospects
This article was downloaded by: [East Carolina University]On: 20 October 2013, At: 07:37Publisher: Taylor & FrancisInforma Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number:1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street,London W1T 3JH, UK
Journal of Plant NutritionPublication details, including instructions forauthors and subscription information:http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/lpla20
Mechanisms of foliaruptake of plant nutrients:Accomplishments andprospectsSeshadri Kannan aa Biology and Agriculture Division , BhabhaAtomic Research Centre , Bombay, 400 085,IndiaPublished online: 21 Nov 2008.
To cite this article: Seshadri Kannan (1980) Mechanisms of foliar uptake ofplant nutrients: Accomplishments and prospects, Journal of Plant Nutrition, 2:6,717-735
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01904168009362810
PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE
Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of allthe information (the “Content”) contained in the publications on ourplatform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensorsmake no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy,completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinionsand views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views ofthe authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis.The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should beindependently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor andFrancis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings,demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoeveror howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, inrelation to or arising out of the use of the Content.
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private studypurposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution,reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in anyform to anyone is expressly forbidden. Terms & Conditions of accessand use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Eas
t Car
olin
a U
nive
rsity
] at
07:
37 2
0 O
ctob
er 2
013
JOURNAL OF PLANT NUTRITION, 2 ( 6 ) , 717-735 (1980)
MECHANISMS OF FOLIAR UPTAKE OF PLANT NUTRIENTS:
ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PROSPECTS
KEY WORDS; Nutrient absorption by leaf, mechanisms,cuticular penetrations, absorption by leafcells, nutrient transport from leaves.
Seshadri KannanBiology and Agriculture DivisionBhabha Atomic Research Centre
Bombay 400 085, India
ABSTRACT
It has been established that the plant leaves and other
above-ground parts are capable of absorbing chemicals and
nutrients. However, there is great paucity of information
regarding the mechanisms of ion uptake by leaves and their
transport to other parts. Equally not well understood is
the phenomenon of retranslocation of elements from one leaf
to another during the different stages of plant growth. The
results of investigations carried out in this area of foliar
uptake and translocation in the last few years are described.
In this review, the importance of future studies to investi-
717
Copyright © 1980 by Marcel Dekker, Inc.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Eas
t Car
olin
a U
nive
rsity
] at
07:
37 2
0 O
ctob
er 2
013
718 KANNAN
gate the mechanisms involved in f o l i a r transport, the
influence of plant growth substances, and the effectiveness
of timely supply of specific nutrients during the grain
development stage, i s stressed.
INTRODUCTION'
The leaf i s the principal seat of several metabolic
a c t i v i t i e s in higher plants, and the mineral elements which
are both s t r u c t u r a l and functional in nature, reach t h i s
seat essentially to participate in the acquisition and
fixing up of the atmospheric carbon. This feature of plants
of terrestrial habitat differs from those which remain in
the aquatic medium, in that all the parts, namely, the leaf
and the roots of the latter carry out both the abstraction
and assimilation of nutrients. Leaves have been employed as
a portal of entry to the plant system, for growth substances
and herbicides to modify or control plant growth, and also
for systemic insecticides to prevent infestation. In all
these cases, the pathways and mechanisms are largely similar
to those for nutrient uptake.
The mechanisms of foliar uptake as well as the effici-
ency of foliar feeding of various nutrient elements have
been investigated more intensively during a period of 2
decades from the 1950s in a number of laboratories, espe-
cially by Wittwer and associates at Michigan State Univer-
sity, and the subject has been reviewed ' ' . However,
the concepts of plant nutrition relating to root absorption
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Eas
t Car
olin
a U
nive
rsity
] at
07:
37 2
0 O
ctob
er 2
013
FOLIAR UPTAKE OF NUTRIENTS 719
have changed enormously in the l a s t few years, f i r s t l y by
the discovery of dual mechanisms of ion uptake , and secondly
when the plasma membranes from r o o t s could be i s o l a t e d and
ion binding and the r o l e of ATPases are b e t t e r understood .
Further, t h e r e have been breakthroughs in the mechanisms of
photosynthesis, significant of which i s the identification
of C, and C. pathways. The foliar uptake of nutrients i s
closely associated with these processes and the prospects of
foliar nutrition research in the light of these and other
advancements are great and would be equally rewarding. In
recent times, indiscriminate and heavy f e r t i l i z a t i o n of soil
have threatened our environment, prominent amongst these
being the increase in the nitrogen content of ground and
river waters, which affect the aquatic animal foods. Foliar
supply of nutrients when found effective, would minimise
these dangers.
PERMEABILITY OF CUTICLE - A PREREQUISITE TO FOLIAR ABSORPTION
The leaf is covered by a non-cellular cuticular struc-
ture which has been studied chemically and functionally ' •
Leece has observed that the differential foliar absorption
amongst plant species was due to the differences in cuticle
thickness, weight, surface wax and wettability, amongst
other factors. He has indicated that foliar absorption can
be enhanced by improved partitioning of the waxes via the
stomata. I t has been however emphasized earlier that th
stomates are also covered by a cuticle, and are not mere
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Eas
t Car
olin
a U
nive
rsity
] at
07:
37 2
0 O
ctob
er 2
013
720 KANNAN
perforations, as widely misconceived. Yamada et al
isolated cuticles enzymically and reported that the pene-
tration rates of ions through both the astomatous (tomato
fruit) and the stomatous (onion leaf) cuticles were the same.
On the other hand, the penetration of Fe was found to be
very much higher through stomatous than through the astoma-
tous cuticular membranes isolated from the same plant spe-
21 15
cies, Euonymus japonicus , or Coffea arabica . Further,
molecular weight of the solute has significant effect on
the penetration, substances with higher molecualr weight
penetrating rather slowly . The ionic radius and degree of
hydration also influenced the penetration rates which gene-
rally followed the order of lyotropic series . Recently,
a method using a twin chamber has been developed for study-
ing the cuticular penetration, and i t is reported that the
cuticles from astomatous surfaces of citrus leaves were
more permeable to Fe than the stomatous ones . Permeability
studies with isolated cuticles are fraught with variations
amongst plant species. Although the stomates are covered
with cuticular invaginations, these would be thinner than
their continuations on the leaf, and therefore permeability
of these stomatal cuticles may be greater. It is to be
recognized that in intact leaves, permeability of air and
water molecules through the stomates is greater than the
other areas, and therefore stomatal penetration of solutes
in intact leaves will be greater.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Eas
t Car
olin
a U
nive
rsity
] at
07:
37 2
0 O
ctob
er 2
013
FOLIAR UPTAKE OF NUTRIENTS 721
Franke has indicated that there are specific channels
like ectodesmata in the cuticle, which would facilitate
cuticular entry to epidermal cells. Ectodesmata are demons-
trable as microscopical structures found mostly in the outer
walls of the epidermal cells of leaves and other above-
ground plant organs, and are distinguished by specific
physicochemical features. According to Franke , these are
not morphological structures of the wall but spaces in the
wall, and probably occur contiguous from cuticular spaces to
plasmalemma membranes. The role of ectodesmata (now known
as ectocythode) in foliar absorption and excretion has been
discussed in detail .
Studies on the penetration of substances through the
cuticles indicate that the process is only passive and not
energy—mediated, since these are devoid of living cells.
However, the enhancement of penetration of ions in the
presence of urea through cuticles has been attributed as
due to a "facilitated diffusion". The intact cuticles
behave differently from the enzymically isolated ones, and
may be holding water molecules in a different way when
attached to the living cells beneath. Furthermore, the
isolation process will alter the intracuticular arrangement
14
between the lipids and water molecules. Haas and Schonherr
have reported that water permeability of different plant
cuticular membranes are determined by the soluble lipids
contained within the membranes, and water permeability charac-
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Eas
t Car
olin
a U
nive
rsity
] at
07:
37 2
0 O
ctob
er 2
013
722 KANNAN
t e r i s t i c s get altered with the age of the leaf. If cuticular
penetration of ions i s passive in an intact leaf, i t should
follow the pathway as water, simply by diffusion. Since
waterpermeability depends on the composition of soluble
lipids within the cuticle, the penetration of inorganic ions
and organic substances must be regulated by these l i p i d s .
There i s no report that describes such correlation. The
study on ion penetration through intact cuticular membranes
i s predisposed with d i f f i c u l t i e s and the results with leaf
are mere extrapolations.
ION UPTAKE BY LEAP CELLS
Foliar absorption of nutrients i s a multi-step process
consisting of passive and active components . However,
isolated and yet living systems offer better means of study-
ing the various uptake processes. Leaf cells have been enzy-
mically isolated and ion uptake has been studied under con—
20 22 32trolled conditions ' • . Leaf slices have been used by
Epstein group and have been found suitable for studying
the mechanisms of uptake at cellular level, comparable to
those by excised roots and stem slices (potato). The ion
•uptake processes by leaf slices resemble closely those by
root c e l l s , and the leaf slices 1 mm. thick have been
employed in several investigations on ion uptake ' '
I t has been found that the process of ion absorption by leaf
cells was metabolic and inhibited by respiratory inhibitors.
The leaf slices of a number of plant species have been used
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Eas
t Car
olin
a U
nive
rsity
] at
07:
37 2
0 O
ctob
er 2
013
FOLIAR UPTAKE OF NUTRIENTS • 723
t o study the mechanisms of uptake of several n u t r i e n t i o n s .
The absorption of Cu, Zn and .'In by sugarcane leaf t i s s u e was
found t o follow a curve t y p i c a l of may ion uptake processes,
and Mn exhibited a second mechanism of uptake . The absorp-
t i o n of a l l c a t ions were found t o be coupled t o oxidative
phosphorylation. Light enhancement of ion uptake has been
noted in corn leaf t i s s u e and in enzymically i s o l a t e d
tobacco leaf cells ' . A light-stimulated chloride uptake
independent of stomatal opening was observed in chopped and
43
whole leaf (wheat) laminae . These effects of light indi-
cate that metabolic energy needed for ion absorption is supp-
lied through photosynthesis. However, certain differences
have been noted. In some cases light was found to enhance57 59
ion absorption under even anaerobic conditions ' . Jacoby17observed that there were differences in the distribution
0 0 AA /LO 00
of Na, Rb and K. In bean leaf slices, Na was concen-
trated in the vascular tissue while Rb was uniformly d i s t r i -
buted. Incubation under light however showed greater d i s t r i -
bution around stomata. Such a difference between light and42dark incubation was not obtained in the case of K. In this
connection, the work of Kholdebarin and Oertli is quite
interesting. They have shown that salt uptake and organic
acid synthesis were consistently higher in the light than in
the dark, and that the light-enhanced salt uptake in barley
leaf tissues was caused by additional source of ATP avail-
42able from photophosphorylation. Luttge e_t 1 measured
chloride uptake by leaf cells of a number of plants and
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Eas
t Car
olin
a U
nive
rsity
] at
07:
37 2
0 O
ctob
er 2
013
724 KANNAN
found s i g n i f i c a n t difference in uptake between the C, and C
plants under the l i g h t and dark. Light always stimulated
chloride uptake in C p l a n t s , while both i n h i b i t i o n and
enhancement were obtained in C species, depending on the
physiological s t a t e of the leaves. They observed t h a t photo-
synthetic energy other than ATP or wP i s involved in chlo-
r i d e uptake by C. plant species.
TRANSLOCATIOH OF FOLIAR APPLIED K'UTSIEHTS
The transport of n u t r i e n t s from leaves to other parts
was investigated with isotopes by means of a leaf drop
method and l a t e r a leaf immersion technique was developed
so that there could be a continuous supply of ions to f a c i l i -
19t ä t e more precise k i n e t i c analysis of uptake mechanisms .
Foliar uptake and translocation of micronutrients were mea-
sured by supplying the isotopic solution into a p l a s t i c cup
having a 1 cm diam. opening at the bottom, while the cup was
fixed to the surface of the leaf . By t h i s method (Fig. 1)
larger q u a n t i t i e s of solute could be supplied and the 'free
space1 and 'exchangeable' components of absorption could be
eas i l y removed by washing with cold unlabelled solution
placed in the cup. Further, t h i s method does not a f f e c t the
r e s p i r a t i o n or photosynthesis carried on by the l e a f . Growth
substances can also be fed through the cup along with the
isotopes, when e f f e c t s of growth substances on ion transport
are studied. Our studies have shown t h a t the mobility of
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Eas
t Car
olin
a U
nive
rsity
] at
07:
37 2
0 O
ctob
er 2
013
FOLIAR UPTAKE OF NUTRIENTS 725
FI6.1.
foliar applied nutrients follow the order K(Rb) >Mo>Mn>Fe
>Zn31'54.
The novenent of nicronutrients supplied to a corn leaf was
followed by means of a chromatogran scanner and i t was found that
28these elements generally moved towards the base of a leaf . It
was also found that ions supplied to one half of a corn leaf did
not migrate laterally, i.e., to the other half of the leaf across
the nidrib , but moved down to the base and perhaps to the main
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Eas
t Car
olin
a U
nive
rsity
] at
07:
37 2
0 O
ctob
er 2
013
726 KANNAN
sten and returned to the other half. It has also been generally
observed that foliar applied elements like 7M are accumulated in
27the stem of plants
Xt i s generally known that the upward transport of
inorganic solutes takes place through the xylem under the
influence of the transpiration stream, and the carbohydrates
and inorganic substances move downwards from the leaves
through the phloem. Ringoet et al studied the movement of
45f o l i a r applied Ca using a semiconductor detector device,
and found greater accumulation in the vascular t i s s u e s . I t
45was shown that f o l i a r applied Ca moved in oat leaf upward
to the t i p through the xylem vessels and downward through
phloem . Penot and Gallou found that chloride was prefe-
r e n t i a l l y transported from leaves acropetally and i t took
place through phloem. In another study Penot and Beraud
reported that the movement of 32P, 35S, 85Rb, 45Ca and 36C1
in Pelargonium leaves was through the phloem tissue and not
cell-to-cell transfer.
GROWTH SUBSTANCES AND FOLIAR TRANSPORT
Plant growth substances are known to have diverse
effects on growth and metabolism. Studies on the effects of
growth regulators and retardants on ion absorption, espe-
cially by leaves, are very limited, although several years
ago substances like kinetin were found to enhance the mobili-
zation of organic and inorganic substances * ' . Halevy
and Wittwer16 showed that GAj (gibberellic acid) at 10~5H
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Eas
t Car
olin
a U
nive
rsity
] at
07:
37 2
0 O
ctob
er 2
013
FOLIAR UPTAKE OF NUTRIENTS 727
given t o the r o o t increased f o l i a r absorption of Rb, and
NAA (1-naphthalene a c e t i c acid) a t 10~ K g r e a t l y enhanced i t s
tr a n s p o r t from leaf t o r o o t . The influence of a chemical,
DK30 (dimethylsulfoxide) which i s commonly used as a solvent
was examined on the penetration of Fe through leaf c u t i c l e s
and was found t o have no e f f e c t . However, in i n t a c t corn
pl a n t s DMSO (0.5 or 1%) was e f f e c t i v e in increasing the
59 7absorption of ?eSO. . The e f f e c t s of growth substances
l i k e GA,f CCC (Chloroethyl Choline chloride) and k i n e t i n
29were t e s t e d on f o l i a r applied Pe in bean p l a n t s . I t was
—5 -4
found that GA3 (10 H) and CCC (5 x 10 M) application to
the trifoliate leaf enhanced the absorption by primary leaf
while kinetin increased the transport to other parts. The
influence of growth substances, viz., ABA (abscisic acid),
ethrel, GA« and IAA on the transport of Rb placed in the25middle of corn leaves was examined and i t was found that
all these chemicals enhanced the rate of transport towards
the base of the leaf. Penot and Beraud have also reported
that growth substances like IAA, 2,4-D, NAA, BAP (benzyl
aminopurine) and GA all influenced" the direction of move-
ment of P, S, and Rb. In another study, Penot found
that the permeability of Mo in senescing leaf disks increased
and this effect was prevented by treatment with BAP. The
influence of ABA and a few growth substances on transport of
48foliar applied Fe and Rb was investigated and i t was found
that the cytokinins differed in their action on their
transport (Fig. 2).
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Eas
t Car
olin
a U
nive
rsity
] at
07:
37 2
0 O
ctob
er 2
013
728 KANNAN
CONCLUDING REMARKS
The work on foliar uptake of nutrients presented here
brings forth several implications. Primarily there is ample
evidence to show that foliar absorption mechanisms largely
resemble those of root absorption. The operation of addi-
tional (second) mechanism in the case of leaf is also indi-
cated. Although cuticle is considered a barrier for foliar
uptake , light, moisture, temperature and also certain
chemicals would bring about alterations not only in the
frifoliates
Primary leaf
Fe trans location
ABAKINETIN
SO] .BA\
' trifoliate' root
•stem
PHLOEM
-- "XYLEM
FIG.2. Cytokinins and foliar translocation.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Eas
t Car
olin
a U
nive
rsity
] at
07:
37 2
0 O
ctob
er 2
013
FOLIAR UPTAKE OF NUTRIENTS 729
permeability of cuticles but also in the absorption by living
cells of the intact leaf. Following absorption by leaf cells,
translocation out of the leaf through living phloem cells
does take place in the case of several elements. The informa-
tion presented here lays great emphasis on the future role of
growth substances on foliar absorption.
Retranslocation of ions from the older leaves is an
important aspect and more research is needed especially with
regard to the elements like Fe, Kn and Zn which are not freely
mobile within plants. Some recent studies in this area have
been reported ' ' ',
Information is scant with regard to ionic interaction
in leaf. For instance, Na when translocated to leaf, becomes
toxic to plants, but this toxicity can perhaps be prevented
if some other element like K which can counteract Na, can be
supplied to the leaf.
Foliar nutrition has an important role in crop produc-
tion. Jones in his editorial has rightly pointed out in
his first sentence "Scientific Research Seems to run in
Cycles". This is very much true in the case of foliar
nutrition, which was vigorously pursued during 1960s, and
slowed down later. There appears to be a renewed interest
now because of several new considerations, like increasing
cost of fertilizers and shortage of irrigation water. Newer
surfactants are being discovered to increase the efficiency4
of foliar absorption and several laboratories are interested
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Eas
t Car
olin
a U
nive
rsity
] at
07:
37 2
0 O
ctob
er 2
013
730 KANNAN
in foliar nutrition investigations ' * . There is evidence
that NaCl is absorbed by leaves of pine trees along the sea
coast, and this situation also should concern those engaged
in plant nutrition . More basic studies are needed to
understand the mechanisms of NaCl through leaf cuticle and
further absorption by leaf cells.
There are special situations where foliar supply of
nutrients may be effective. Foliar fertilization of soybeans
with N,P, K and 5 during the seed-filling period has been
found to be effective in increasing yield . Foliar appli-
cation could be used to prevent the depletion of nutrients
in the leaves and the resulting reduction in photosynthesis
during the crucial period of grain-filling due to poor root
absorption or retranslocation from the older leaves. Newer
compounds are being screened for efficacy and high molecular
weight phosphorus compounds have been found to increase the
yield of corn and soybeans * . Plants grown in saline condi-
tions respond better to foliar application of phosphorus to
44 34
peanut plants . Kendrick has rightly stated "We must
increase agricultural output if we are to provide food and
fibre for an expanding world population. But, as energy
sources become more restricted and costly, and greater
efforts are required to maintain the quality of the environ-
ment, i t is evident that we will need new knowledge and
different agricultural technologies". This is relevant to
the technology of feeding plants through the leaves.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Eas
t Car
olin
a U
nive
rsity
] at
07:
37 2
0 O
ctob
er 2
013
FOLIAR UPTAKE OF NUTRIENTS 731
REFERENCES
1. Barel, D. and C.A. Black. 1979. Fol i a r a p p l i c a t i o n ofP. I . Screening of various inorganic and organiccompounds. Agron. J. 71:15-21.
2. Barel, D. and C.A. Black. 1979. F o l i a r application ofP. I I . Yield responses of corn and soybeans sprayedwith various Condensed phosphates and P-N compounds ingreen house and f i e l d experiments. Agron. J. 71:21-24.
3. Basiouny, F.M. and R.H. Biggs. 1976. Penetration of59Fe through isolated cuticles of citrus leaves.
Hortscience 11:417-419.
4. Beauchamp, E.G. and G. Lean. 1973. Evaluation of sur-factants for zinc absorption by soybean leaf tissues.Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 4:1-7.
5. Bowen, J.E. 1969. Absorption of copper, zinc andmanganese by sugarcane leaf tissue. Plant Physiol.44:255-261.
6. 3ukovac, K.J. and S.H. Wittwer. 1957. Absorption andmobility of foliar applied nutrients. Plant Physiol.32:428-435.
7. Chamel, A. 1972. Pénëtratión et migration du 59Feapplique sur les feuilles de Mais; effet du dimethylsulfoxyde. Physiol. Plantarum 26:170-174.
8. Dale, J.E. and G.M. Felippe. 1977. Nitrogen movementinto and out of the f i r s t leaf of barley. Zeit.Pflanzenphysiol. 84:77-83.
9. Epstein, E. 1966. Dual patterns of ion absorption byplant cells and by plants. Nature 212:1324-1327.
10. Franke, W. 1967. Mechanisms of foliar penetration ofsolutions. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 18:281-300.
11. Franke, W. 1971. The entry of residues into plants viaectodesmata. Residue Rev. 38:81-115.
12. Garcia, R.L. and J.J. Hanway.. 1976. Foliarfertilization of soybeans during the seed filling period.Agron. J. 68:653-657.
13. Grieve, A.M. and M.G. Pitman. 1978. Salinity damageto Norfolk Island pines caused by surfactants. I I I .Evidence for stomatal penetration as the pathway ofsalt entry to leaves. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 5:397-413.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Eas
t Car
olin
a U
nive
rsity
] at
07:
37 2
0 O
ctob
er 2
013
732 KANNAN
14. Haas, K. and J. Schonherr. 1979. Composition of solublecuticular lipids and water permeability of cuticularmembranes from citrus leaves. Planta 146:399-403.
15. Haile Mariam, S.N. 1965. Mechanisms of foliar penetra-tion and translocation of mineral ions with specialreference to coffee (Coffea arabica L.). Ph.D. ThesisMichigan State University.
16. Halevy, A.H. and S.H. Wittwer. 1965. Foliar uptake andtranslocation of rubidium in bean plants as affected byroot absorbed growth regulators. Planta 67:375-383.
17. Jacoby, B. 1975. Light sensitivity of 22Na, 86Rb and42k absorption by different tissues of bean leaves.Plant Physiol. 55:978-981.
18. Jones Jr.,J.B. 1979. Journal of Plant Nutrition. I:p.iii-v.
19. Jyung, W.H. and S.H. Wittwer. 1964. Foliar absorption -an active uptake process. Amer. J. Bot. 51:437-444.
20. Jyung, W.H., S.H. Wittwer and M.J. Bukovac. 1965. Ionuptake by cells enzymically isolated from green tobaccoleaves. Plant Physiol. 40:410-414.
21. Kannan, S. 1969. Penetration of iron and some organicsubstances through isolated cuticular membranes. PlantPhysiol. 44:517-521.
22. Kannan, 5. 1969. Factors related to ion absorption byenzymically isolated leaf cells. Plant Physiol. 44:1457-1461.
23. Kannan, S. 1971. Absorption and transport of Fe inplants in relation to dual mechanisms. Internl. Symp.on "Use of Isotopes and Radiation in Agriculture andAnimal Husbandry Research". New Delhi, Dec. 71. pp.439-447.
24. Kannan, S. 1977. An in vivo determination of thetransport of 59Fe and 54Mn to different leaves of youngcorn seedlings. Zeit. Pflanzenphysiol. 83:375-378.
25. Kannan, S. 1978. Transport of 86Rb in corn leaves asinfluenced by some growth substances. Zeit.Pflanzenphysiol. 90:85-88.
26. Kannan, S. 1978. Lateral movement of cations in cornleaves. Plant Physiol. 61:706-707.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Eas
t Car
olin
a U
nive
rsity
] at
07:
37 2
0 O
ctob
er 2
013
FOLIAR UPTAKE OF NUTRIENTS 733
27. Kannan, 3. and H. Keppel. 1975. D i f f e r e n t i a l migrationof foliar applied zinc in Maize plants. Zeit.Naturforsch. 31c:195-196.
28. Kannan, S. and H. Keppel. 1977. Studies on the migrationpatterns of 59Fe and 54Mn in young corn leaves using amodified chromatogram scanner. Internl. J. Appl.Radiation and Isotopes 28:573-579.
29. Kannan, S. and T. Mathew. 1970. Effects of growthsubstances on the absorption and transport of iron implants. Plant Physiol. 45:206-209.
30. Kannan, S. and 3. Ramani. 1974. Mechanisms of ionabsorption by bean leaf slices and transport in intactplants. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 71:220-227.
31. Kannan, S. and S. Ramani. 1978. Studies on molybdenumabsorption and transport in bean and rice. Plant Physiol.62:179-181.
32. Kannan, S. and S.H. Wittwer. 1967. Absorption of ironby enzymically isolated leaf cells. Physiol. Plant. 20:911-919.
33. Kannan, S. and S.H. Wittwer. 1967. Ion absorption byleaves. Naturwiss. 54:373
34. Kendrick Jr. J.B. 1977. A new era - but a continuingchallange. Calif. Agri. 31:2
35. Kessler, B. and Z.W. Moscicki. 1958. Effects oftrliodobenzoic acid and maleic hydrazide upon thetransport of foliar applied calcium and iron. PlantPhysiol. 33:70-72.
36. Kholdebarin, B. and J.J. Oertli. 1972. Effects ofmetabolic inhibitors on salt uptake and organic acidsynthesis by leaf tissues in the light and in the dark.2. Fflanzenphysiol. 66:352-358.
37. Leece, D.R. 1976. Composition and ultrastructure ofleaf cuticles from fruit trees, relative to differentialfoliar absorption. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 3:833-847.
38. Leece, D.R. and J.F. Dirou. 1977. Organosilicone andalginate adjuvants evaluated in urea sprays foliar-applied to prune tree. Comm. Soil. Sci and Plant Analysis.8:169-176.
39. Leece, D.R. and A.L. Kenworthy. 1971. Effects of potnitrate foliar sprays on leaf nitrogen concentration andgrowth of peach trees. HortScience 6:171-173.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Eas
t Car
olin
a U
nive
rsity
] at
07:
37 2
0 O
ctob
er 2
013
734 KANNAN
40. Leece, D.R. and A.L. Kenworthy. 1972. Influence ofepicuticular waxes on foliar absorption of nitrate ionsby apricot leaf disks. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 25:641-643.
41. Leonard, R.T., D. Hansen and T.K. Hodges. 1973. Membrane-bound adenosine triphosphatase activities of oat roots.Plant Physiol. 51:749-754.
42. Luttge, U., E. Ball and K. Willert. 1971. A comparativestudy of the coupling of ion uptake to light reactions inleaves of higher plant species having the C3 and C4-pathway of photosynthesis. Z. Pflansenphysiol. 65:336-350.
43. MacDonald, I.R. and A.E.S. Macklon. 1975. Light enhancedchloride uptake by wheat leaf laminae. Plant Physiol.56:105-108.
44. Kalakondaiah, N. and G. Rajeswararao. 1979. Effects offoliar application of phosphorus on growth and mineralcomposition in peanut plants (Arachis hypogaea L.) undersalt stress. Plant and Soil 52:41-48.
45. Martin, J.T. and B.E. Juniper. 1970. The cuticle ofplants. (Edward Arnold, London).
46. Mothes, K. 1964. The role of kinetin in plantregulation. In: Regulateurs naturels de la croissancevegetale, p.131-140, Paris CNRS.
47. Müller, K. and A.C. Leopold. 1966. The mechanisms ofkinetin induced transport in corn leaves. Planta 68:186-205.
48. Pandey, D.P. and S. Kannan. 1976. Action of ABA andsome cytokinins on the transport of foliar and rootabsorbed Rb+ and Fe++ in bean plants. Z. Pflanzen-physiol. 78:95-102.
49. Pandey, D.P. and 3. Kannan. 1979. Modification ofretranslocation patterns of Fe++ and Rb+ in bean plantsduring new growth. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 93:365-370.
50. Penot, M. 1974. Evolution de la permeabilite sumolybdate chez des disques de feuille de tabac, su coursdu vieillissement influence de la benzylaminopurine.Plant Sci. letters 3:399-405.
51. Penot, M. and Jacky Beraud. 1978. Migrations orienteeset Phytohormones. Valeur de la feuille detachee commemateriel experimental. Physiol. Plant. 42:14-20.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Eas
t Car
olin
a U
nive
rsity
] at
07:
37 2
0 O
ctob
er 2
013
FOLIAR UPTAKE OF NUTRIENTS 735
52. Penot, M. and J. Gallon. 1977. Contribution aletude dela physiologies des t r a n s p o r t s a longue distance duchlore 36C1 dans l a p l a n t e . Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 85:201-214.
53. Rains, D.W. 1967. Light-enhanced potassium absorptionof corn leaf t i s s u e s . Science 156:1382-1383.
54. Rarnani, S. and S. Kannan. 1975. Manganese absorptionand t r a n s p o r t in r i c e . Physiol. P l a n t . 33:133-137.
55. Ringoet, A., R.V. Rechenmann and M. Kelloni. 1968.Calcium l o c a l i s a t i o n within l i v e oat leaves using asemiconductor det e c t o r assembly. Planta 81:280-286.
56» Ringoet, A., G. Sauer and A.J. Gielink. 1968. Phloemtransport of calcium in oat leaves. Planta 80:15-20.
57. Robinson, J.B. and F.A. Smith. 1970. Chloride influxinto cells of citrus leaf slices. Aust. J. Biol. Sci.23:953-960.
58. Smith, R.C. and E. Epstein. 1964. Ion absorption byshoot tissue: technique and f i r s t findings withexcised leaf tissue of corn. Plant Physiol. 39:338-341.
59. Steinitz, B. and B. Jacoby. 1974. Energetics of 22Naabsorption by bean leaf slices. Ann. Bot. 38:453-457.
60. Wittwer, S.H. and K.J. Bukovac. 1969. The uptake ofnutrients through leaf surfaces. In: Handbuch derPflanzenernahrung und Dungung. Ed. K. Scharrer andH. Linser, Springer-verlag New York.
61. Wittwer, S.H., M.J. Bukovac, W.H. Jyung, Y. Yamada,R. De, H.P. Rasmussen, S.N. Haile Mariam and S. Kannan.1967. Foliar absorption - penetration of the cuticularmembrane and nutrient uptake by isolated cells. Qual.Plant. Hater. Veg. 14:105-120.
62. Yamada, Y., S.H. Wittwer and M.J. Bukovac. 1964.Penetration of ions through isolated cuticles. PlantPhysiol. 39:28-32.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Eas
t Car
olin
a U
nive
rsity
] at
07:
37 2
0 O
ctob
er 2
013