Mechanically Efficient Cellular Microstructures in Plants · • Connor S (1994) New England...
Transcript of Mechanically Efficient Cellular Microstructures in Plants · • Connor S (1994) New England...
1
Mechanically Efficient Cellular Microstructures in Plants
Lorna J. GibsonMaterials Science & Engineering
MIT
2
Introduction
• Plants are typically loaded in bending by wind and in compression by self-weight
• Minimizing mass reduces metabolic cost to grow material
• Examine strategies used in plants to reduce mass
3
Introduction
• Wood: Uniform honeycomb-like structure
• Palm stem: Radial density gradient• Plant stem: Cylindrical shell with
compliant core• Monocotyledon leaves: Sandwich
structures
4
Wood:Honeycomb-Like Microstructure
Cedar
5
Wood: Honeycomb Models
Cell wall:FiberCompositeModelE*
Esalong
=ρ*
ρs
E*
Es across
=ρ*
ρs
⎛
⎝⎜⎞
⎠⎟
3
6
Wood in Bending: E1/2/ρ E*( )1/2
ρ* =Es( )1/2
ρs
ρs
ρ*
⎛⎝⎜
⎞⎠⎟
1/2
Stiffness performance index for wood inbending is similar to that for bestengineering composites
Wood cell wall
7
Wood in Bending: σf2/3/ρ
σ f*( )2 /3
ρ* =σ ys( )2 /3
ρs
ρs
ρ*
⎛⎝⎜
⎞⎠⎟
1/3
Strength performance index for wood inbending is similar to that for best engng composites
8
Wood
• Tree in bending loaded as cantilever• Radius decreases with distance away
from the ground• Further increases mechanical
performance of the tree• E = constant, r = r (z)
9
Palm Stem: Radial Density Gradient
(Also Bamboo)
10
Palm Stem:A Different Strategy
• Stem has constant diameter: r = constant
• As palm grows taller, it increases the density of the material towards its periphery
• Cell wall thickness increases towards periphery of stem and towards the base of the stem E = E (r, z) Coconut Palm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Palmtree_Curacao.jpg
11
Palm: Microstructure ofPeripheral Stem Tissue
Young Old
6 μm 10 μm
Rich, 1987
Kuo-Huang et al., 2004
12
Palm Stem: Density Gradient
Rich, PM (1987) Bot.Gazette 148, 42-50.
13
Palm Stem: Density at Breast Height
A single mature palm has a similar range of density as nearly all species of wood combined
Rich, PM (1987) Bot.Gazette 148, 42-50.
Densitiesof commonwoods
14
Palm Stem: Density Gradient
15
Palm Stem: Mechanical Properties vs. Density
Rich, PM (1987) Bot.Gazette 148, 42-50.
16
Density Gradient:Iriartea gigantea
ρ =rro
⎛⎝⎜
⎞⎠⎟
n
ρmax
E = Cρ
ρmax
⎛
⎝⎜⎞
⎠⎟
m
= Crro
⎛
⎝⎜⎞
⎠⎟
mn
EI( )gradient =Cπro
4
mn + 4
EI( )gradient
EI( )uniform
=4
mn + 4n + 2
2⎛⎝⎜
⎞⎠⎟
m
Iriartea palm: n = 2, m = 2.5, (EI)gradient/(EI)uniform = 2.5
Similar calculation for Welfia georgii, gives(EI)gradient/(EI)uniform = 1.6
17
Palm Stem:Bending Stress Distribution
σ (y) = Eε = Eκ y
σ (r,θ ) = Crro
⎛
⎝⎜⎞
⎠⎟
mn
κ r cosθ ∝ rmn+1
Iriartea gigantea: m = 2.5, n =2
σ ∝ r6
18
Palm Stem:Bending Strength Distribution
σ * ∝ρ
ρmax
⎛⎝⎜
⎞⎠⎟
q
∝rro
⎛⎝⎜
⎞⎠⎟
nq
Iriartea gigantea: n = 2, q = 2
σ * ∝ r4
Strength matchesbending stress distribution
19
Plant Stems:Cylindrical Shells with
Compliant Cores
(Also in Animal Quills,Toucan Beak)
20
Plant Stems
Milkweed Grassy stem
21
Milkweed Stem
22
Grassy Stem
Hollow struts
23
Plant stems
• Circular tube cross-section• Resists bending (wind loads)• Maximize shape factor
• Maximize a/t, but limited by local buckling and ovalization
• Plant stems have compliant core (“core-rind structure”)
Φ =4π IA2 =
at
24
Plant Stems: Bending
• Core resists ovalization and increases local buckling resistance
25
Plant Stems: Bending
• Local buckling occurs when normal stress in compressive side of cylinder equals critical stress for axisymmetric buckling under uniaxial stress
• Hollow cylinder:
• Cylinder with compliant core:
Mlb =0.939Eat 2
1− ν 2
Mlb =πEa2t1− ν 2
fδr
,Ecore
Eshell
,at
⎧⎨⎩
⎫⎬⎭
26
Plant Stems• Foam-like core can act like elastic foundation supporting outer
shell, increasing local buckling moment, Mlb, reducing buckling λ
Hollow tube
Ec increasing
27
Plant Stems
Hollow tube
28
Plant Stems
• Within the core stress decays as move radially inward, away from the shell
• Stresses less than 5% of maximum at aradial distance of 5λcr
• Can remove inner core, leaving core thickness, c = 5λcr
29
Plant Stems
25
50
59
a/t
3.270.77YesSedge grass, common barley
3.811.26YesOat, rye grasses
3.811.37YesTall blue lettuce
c/λcrMlb/MeqElastic foundation
Species
Core increases buckling resistance for high a/t
30
Monocotyledon Leaves:Sandwich Structures
(Also in Skulls, Cuttlefish Bone, Horseshoe Crab Shell)
31Iris Bulrush
Monocotyledon Leaves: Sandwich Beams
32
Sandwich Structures: Leaves
Iris leaf
Bulrush leaf1mm
0.5 mm
SclerenchymaParenchyma
33
Sandwich Structures: Leaves
Lolium perenne(Rye grass)
Stipa gigantea(Giant feather
grass)
Vincent, 1982,1991
Black = sclerenchymaWhite = parenchyma
34
Monocotyledon Leaves
• Fibers (sclerenchyma) along outer surface of leaves
• Foam-like cells (parenchyma) or ribs in core • Acts like structural sandwich panel• Increase in moment of inertia by separating
stiff “faces” by a lightweight “core”• Large surface area for photosynthesis
35
Sandwich Beam Deflection
δ = δb + δ s =Pl 3
B1 EI( )eq
+Pl
B2 AG( )eq
EI( )eq ≈Ef btc2
2AG( )eq ≈ bcGcFlexural rigidity: Shear rigidity:
Cantilever: B1 = 3 B2 = 1
36
Iris Leaves
t = 30 μm
c = 0.5 to 3.0 mm
Ef = 8.2 GPa
Gc = 2 MPa
Measured stiffnesses (N/mm): 0.66 0.54 0.41 0.25Calculated stiffnesses (N/mm): 1.21 0.78 0.51 0.29
Calculated/measured: 1.83 1.44 1.24 1.16
37
Conclusion
• Wood– Uniform honeycomb increases E1/2/ρ, σf
2/3/ρ– Constant ρ, E, σf, vary r(z) in tree
• Palm stem– Radial density gradient– Constant r, vary ρ(r), E(r), σf(r) in palm stem– Increases (EI) relative to uniform distribution of
solid– Stress distribution across radius matches strength
distribution
38
Conclusion
• Plant stems– Cylindrical shell with compliant core– Increases buckling resistance over equivalent
hollow circular tube for large a/t
• Monocotyledon leaves– Sandwich structure, efficient in bending– Leaves provide own structural support as well as
area for photosynthesis– Rectangular cross-section maximizes surface area
for photosynthesis
39
Acknowledgements
• Mike Ashby, Ken Easterling, Hugh Shercliff• Gebran Karam, Phoebe Cheng, Ulrike Wegst, Ros Olive, Tessa
Shercliff• Justin Breucop, Don Galler, Beth Beighlie
• National Science Foundation• Matoula S. Salapatas Professorship at MIT
40
Image References
• Connor S (1994) New England Natives: A celebration of people and trees. Harvard University Press.
• Dinwoodie J (1981)Timber: Its nature and behaviour. Van Nostrand Reinhold.
• Rich PM (1987) Mechanical structure of the stem of arborescent palms. Bot. Gazette 148, 42.
• Rich PM (1987) Developmental anatomy of the stem of Welfia Georgii , Iriartea Gigantea and other arborescent palms:Implications for mechanical support. Am. J. Botany 74, 792.