Measuring Infringement of IPR IPO Report Summary Findings A Review of existing methods and...
-
Upload
samantha-macleod -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
3
Transcript of Measuring Infringement of IPR IPO Report Summary Findings A Review of existing methods and...
![Page 1: Measuring Infringement of IPR IPO Report Summary Findings A Review of existing methods and recommendations for new robust methodologies September 2013.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/5515bf5d550346486b8b6324/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Measuring Infringement of IPR
IPO Report Summary Findings
A Review of existing methods and recommendations for new robust methodologies
September 2013
![Page 2: Measuring Infringement of IPR IPO Report Summary Findings A Review of existing methods and recommendations for new robust methodologies September 2013.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/5515bf5d550346486b8b6324/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Content
► Background
► Approach Methodology
► General Observations
► Distinctive Features
► Harmonising Framework
► Application of the Framework
![Page 3: Measuring Infringement of IPR IPO Report Summary Findings A Review of existing methods and recommendations for new robust methodologies September 2013.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/5515bf5d550346486b8b6324/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
IP INFRINGEMEN
T
![Page 4: Measuring Infringement of IPR IPO Report Summary Findings A Review of existing methods and recommendations for new robust methodologies September 2013.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/5515bf5d550346486b8b6324/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
BACKGROUND
Study commissioned by the intellectual Property Office (IPO) Scope: Review of methodologies identifying the scale of infringement across 4 main IP Rights Types:
Copyright(online & offline)
TrademarkPatent Design Rights
![Page 5: Measuring Infringement of IPR IPO Report Summary Findings A Review of existing methods and recommendations for new robust methodologies September 2013.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/5515bf5d550346486b8b6324/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
METHODOLOGY
![Page 6: Measuring Infringement of IPR IPO Report Summary Findings A Review of existing methods and recommendations for new robust methodologies September 2013.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/5515bf5d550346486b8b6324/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
METHODOLOGY
Team composed of academics from the University of Hertfordshire and Research/Industry experts from Audiencenet
3348
1127
3873
1422
Online Copyright infringement
Patentenforcement
Counterfeitingand piracy
Design rightenforcement
reviewed
used
SOURCES
4 month review of Grey Literature, Trade Body approach to research and views from Experts in the field of piracy, big data, Top down & Bottom Up ApproachClassification and segmentation of available research
• IP Type• Source of Funding
reviewed
used
reviewed
used
reviewed
used
![Page 7: Measuring Infringement of IPR IPO Report Summary Findings A Review of existing methods and recommendations for new robust methodologies September 2013.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/5515bf5d550346486b8b6324/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
TRADE BODIES RESEARCH
![Page 8: Measuring Infringement of IPR IPO Report Summary Findings A Review of existing methods and recommendations for new robust methodologies September 2013.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/5515bf5d550346486b8b6324/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
GENERAL OBSERVATIONS
![Page 9: Measuring Infringement of IPR IPO Report Summary Findings A Review of existing methods and recommendations for new robust methodologies September 2013.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/5515bf5d550346486b8b6324/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
DISTINCTIVE FEATURES
![Page 10: Measuring Infringement of IPR IPO Report Summary Findings A Review of existing methods and recommendations for new robust methodologies September 2013.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/5515bf5d550346486b8b6324/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
![Page 11: Measuring Infringement of IPR IPO Report Summary Findings A Review of existing methods and recommendations for new robust methodologies September 2013.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/5515bf5d550346486b8b6324/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
1. Highly skewed behaviour2. Dynamically changing perceptions3. Rapidly changing costs of distribution and
recompense4. Driven by perception of risk
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
![Page 12: Measuring Infringement of IPR IPO Report Summary Findings A Review of existing methods and recommendations for new robust methodologies September 2013.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/5515bf5d550346486b8b6324/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
APPLICATIONOF THE
FRAMEWORK
![Page 13: Measuring Infringement of IPR IPO Report Summary Findings A Review of existing methods and recommendations for new robust methodologies September 2013.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/5515bf5d550346486b8b6324/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
APPLICATION OF THE FRAMEWORK
PUBLIC REFERENCE
POINT
audience
Creator
perpetrator
![Page 14: Measuring Infringement of IPR IPO Report Summary Findings A Review of existing methods and recommendations for new robust methodologies September 2013.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/5515bf5d550346486b8b6324/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
THE CONCLUSION: A CALL FOR CONSISTENT OVERSIGHT
![Page 15: Measuring Infringement of IPR IPO Report Summary Findings A Review of existing methods and recommendations for new robust methodologies September 2013.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/5515bf5d550346486b8b6324/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
A call for the need to establish a consensus around the common stack in the ground, a role in this instance for a government contribution to act as the guardian and frame of reference, this will require a commitment to a sustained and regular reporting of a sampling of the participants, alongside longitudinal collation of extreme behaviour.
CONCLUSION