Measuring Human Performance

13
Task Analysis: Addressing complex sociotechnical systems Erin Morrissey 2/8/2016

description

Measuring Human Performance. Muckler (1992) Kantowitz (1992) Hennessy(1990). Muckler (1992). Selecting Performance Measures: “Objective” versus “Subjective” Measurement. The Human Observer. “Alas, no fundamental step in science or technology is independent of the human” ( Muckler 1992) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Measuring Human Performance

Page 1: Measuring Human Performance

Task Analysis: Addressing complex sociotechnical

systems

Erin Morrissey2/8/2016

Page 2: Measuring Human Performance

Vicente (1999)

• What types of task analysis are suitable for complex sociotechnical systems?

• Role of unpredictability.• Contributions to modern task analysis.• How can we minimize design artifacts?

Page 3: Measuring Human Performance

Task Analysis

• Normative – What the worker should do• Descriptive – What the worker actually does• Formative – The requirements that need to

be met

Page 4: Measuring Human Performance

Normative Approach

• What the worker should do.• Inputs -> outputs• Sequential Flow• Timeline

• How do you determine the fuel efficiency of your car?

• Does not account for the unpredictable.

Page 5: Measuring Human Performance

Normative MethodsInstruction

• What to do

• Less worker discretion

• Less susceptible to human error?

• Device dependent

• Closed systems

Constraint• What not to do

• More worker discretion

• Fosters learning

• More susceptible to human error?

• Device independent

• Open systems

Page 6: Measuring Human Performance

Control Theory

Page 7: Measuring Human Performance

Work Domain Analyses

Directions MapsMental Economy efficient effortfulAbility to adapt to unforeseen contingencies

brittle flexible

Scope of applicability narrow broadAbility to recover from errors limited great

Table 3.3 Relative Advantages and Disadvantages of Directions and Maps

Page 8: Measuring Human Performance

Descriptive Approach

• What the worker actually does• Francophone ergonomics• Task vs. Activity

Page 9: Measuring Human Performance

Contributions

• Hutchins (1995)• Ship Navigation• Physical symbol system hypothesis• (Lacked ecological validity)

• Distributed Cognition

• Klein (1989)• Fire commanders• Classic Decision Theory (sequential)• Recognition-Primed Decision Making

Page 10: Measuring Human Performance

Contributions

• Suchman (1987)• Interaction b/w office workers and help system• Conversation analyses• Situated Action

• Bødker (1991)• Text and image processing• Anglo-American approach to HCI• (focus on artifacts, not context)

• Activity Theory

Page 11: Measuring Human Performance

Task-Artifact Cycle

“[B]y basing new designs on work analysis of current practice, designers will always be one step behind their interventions.”

Page 12: Measuring Human Performance

Iterations!

Rapid prototyping

User Testing Rapid prototyping

User Testing Rapid prototyping

User Testing

Page 13: Measuring Human Performance

In summary

• Use the formative approach to task analysis• This will address the unique needs of a

complex sociotechnical system

• Utilize models to assuage limitation of iterations and scenario based design

• Work domain analysis• Let the activity guide the design