CLE Workshop: Building Effective Intergovernmental Relations
Measuring-Effective-Digital-Media-Relations
-
date post
21-Oct-2014 -
Category
Business
-
view
1.554 -
download
2
description
Transcript of Measuring-Effective-Digital-Media-Relations
Evaluating the Effectiveness of your Media Relations Strategies Media Relations in the Digital Age ConferenceJon Wade – Head of Digital, Asia PacificWeber Shandwick
I’m just back from scuba diving in the Philippines…
Measurement is pretty crucial in scuba diving:• It tells you when you’re
about to run out of air• It tells you if you’re likely
to get nitrogen narcosis, oxygen toxicity or ‘the bends’
• It essentially stops you dying!!
Whilst, PR measurement isn’t quite in the same life-or-death category, nor the most fascinating subject matter on the planet…
…it’s still a vital component of our
communications activities because it
allows us to measure and optimise the
effectiveness of our activities
Contents• Introduction• Barcelona Principles• Measurement Framework• Prioritising Measurement• Measurement Tools• A bit of fun to end…• Q&A
“Barcelona Principles” for PR measurement
Association for Measurement & Evaluation of Communications
Institute for Public Relations
7 ‘Barcelona Principles’1. Importance of goal setting and measurement2. Measuring the effects on outcomes is
preferred to measuring outputs3. The effect on business results can and should
be measured where possible4. Media measurement requires quantity and
quality5. AVEs are not the value of Public Relations6. Social Media can and should be measured7. Transparency and replicability are paramount
to sound measurement
Principle #1: Importance of goal setting and measurement
Implication: If this is
true, we need to
invest both time and
budget in the goal
setting and
measurement aspects
of our programme
• Goal-setting and measurement are fundamental aspects of any public relations programme
• Goals should be as quantitative as possible and address who, what, when and how the PR program is intended perform
A couple of acronyms that can help us with Principle #1
S.M.A.R.T.
R.E.A.
Regarding our objectives:
Regarding our communication goals:
S.M.A.R.T.
pecificeasurablechievableealisticimed
Our objectives should be:
Are our objectives clearly defined?
Is it possible to measure the objectives?
Are the objectives even possible?
Do we have the resources / time to deliver?
What is the timescale?
Reach
Engagement
Action
Are our communications primarily concerned with generating…?
Are we trying to increase product / brand awareness?
Are we trying to increase product / brand consideration or willingness to buy
Are we trying to increase product sales?
A perfect client brief (from a measurement point of view)
We’re launching our new <insert product / brand>.The key business objective for the PR campaign is to raise awareness amongst <insert target audience> from the current 20% awareness level to 30% within 6 months as measured by an online survey.
S.M.A.R.T. R.E.A.☐ ☐
• Outcomes include shifts in awareness, comprehension, attitude and behavior related to purchase, donations, brand equity, corporate reputation, employee engagement, public policy, investment decisions with respect to a company, NGO, government or other entity.
• Practices for measuring the effect on outcomes should be tailored to the business objectives of the PR activities.
Quantitative measures preferred However, qualitative methods to
supplement
Principle #2: Measuring the effect on outcomes is preferred to measuring outputs
Business Objective
Campaign Objective
Example Measures
Tools
Increased product awareness
Reach • Exposure / Coverage
• Earned CPMs
• Social Listening Platforms
• Reach Monitoring Tools
Increasedproduct consideration
Engagement • Comments• Opinions• Sentiment• Shares / Likes• Searches• Site Traffic• Net Promoter
Score
• Engagement monitoring tools
• Search demand tools
• Opinion analysis platforms
• Web Analytics• Surveys• Quant NPS studies
Maximising product sales
Action • Site Traffic• Sales (online /
offline)• ROI
• Sales / CRM DB• Web Analytics• Econometric
Analysis
Measures & Tools
But of course it’s not always possible to measure everything…
…so we need a way of
priortising our measurement
programme.
Pick one primary business objective only
One method:
1
Improving Brand Reputation
Let’s take the example where the key business objective we are primarily trying to manage through our media relations strategy is:
And based on our earlier framework, to achieve this objective, our tactics and measurement are going to be primarily concerned with driving engagement with consumers:
1) Having them engage with the brand online and share / recommend the brand to people within their network
2) Having their opinion of the brand become more positive
3) Having them use positive language in their conversation about the brand online
If these are our objectives, we would consider the following measures:
1. The Brand’s Net Promoter Score2. Opinions of the brand expressed
online3. Sentiment of online
conversations involving our brand
The exact methods we select will depend on the associated costs and budgets available for
measurement
Reputation(NPS)
Long-term Profitability & Growth
Q: “How likely are you to recommend this brand to your friends and family?”
NPS = % Advocates - % Detractors(0 – 10 scale; 0 – 6 Detractors; 7 – 8 Neutral; 9 – 10
Advocates)
Net Promoter Study
Engagement – NPS Correlations
Engagement – NPS Trends & Benchmarks
Engagement – Reputation Survey
Engagement – Opinion, Crimson Hexagon
Sentiment Monitoring
• To measure business results from consumer or brand marketing, models that determine the effects of the quantity and quality of PR outputs on sales or other business metrics, while accounting for other variables, are a preferred choice. Related points are:
Principle #3: The effect on business results can and should be measured where possible
Clients are creating demand for market mix models
The PR industry has to understand the value and implications of market mix models for accurate evaluation of consumer marketing PR
The PR industry needs to develop PR measures that can provide reliable input into market mix models
Marketing Mix ModelsSALES = a + b[TV$] + c[PR$] + d[DM$] + e
Where: a = ‘Natural’ Salesb = Ratio of TV spend to incremental salesc = Ratio of PR spend to incremental salesd = Ratio of DM spend to incremental salese = margin of error
How can you split out the effects of PR for this type of data?
Control
Exposed
Cookie = 0 Cookie =
1
Online techniques provide tools to do this for digital PRExample: We can drop a custom cookie to the audience who visits our Facebook properties
By surveying a sample of those that have a cookie vs those that haven’t we can split out the effect of our Facebook efforts.
Overall clip counts and impressions are usually meaningless. Instead, media measurement, whether in traditional or online channels, should account for:• Impressions among the stakeholder or audience• Quality of the media coverage including:
Tone Credibility and relevance to the stakeholder or audience Inclusion of key messages Inclusion of a 3rd party or company spokesperson
• Quality can be negative, positive, or neutral
Principle #4: Media measurement requires quantity and quality
Verisign Example
Automated sentiment measurement allows us to to get monitor the quality of the coverage we are getting as well as early warning of potential issues and crises
Firebell is an online crisis simulation programme that allows Weber Shandwick client’s to practice responding to an online crisis in a safe offline environment
Reach – Klout
Reach – SNS
Reach – DoubleClick AdPlanner
• Advertising Value Equivalents (AVEs) do not measure the value of public relations and do not inform future activity; they measure the cost of media space and are rejected as a concept to value public relations
• Where a comparison has to be made between the cost of space from earned versus paid media, validated metrics should be used, stated for what they are, and reflect:
Principle #5: AVEs are not the value of Public Relations
negotiated advertising rates relevant to the client, as available
quality of the coverage, including negative results
physical space of the coverage, and the portion of the coverage that is relevant
• Multipliers intended to reflect a greater media cost for earned versus paid media should never be applied unless proven to exist in the specific case
• There is no research to back-up the claim that a news story and an advertisement have an ‘equivalent’ effect– News media credibility varies by story (positively &
negatively)– Has been dropping in past 2 decades
• Often the goal of PR is to reduce publicity…this cannot be measured using AVEs
• Ads are usually designed to work at frequency, news stories tend to be relatively unique
• There isn’t always an equivalent advertising rate – front covers, coverage during news bulletins with no ad breaks, coverage on sites that don’t accept advertising etc
• There is no advertising equivalent of a ‘bad’ or ‘unfavourable’ story – should we ignore those?
The problem with AVEs
Activities 47 Media, Blogger & Influencer Interviews
Reach 170 Earned & Social Media Placements
Relevance 64% Earned & Social Message Penetration
Outcomes 14% Increase in Brand Engagement
Worth $4.72 Earned CPM (Cost Per 1K Impressions)
94 Facebook, YouTube, Blog & Twitter Posts
3.9M Earned & Social Media Impressions
27% Earned & Social Media Share
27% Category Sales Share
$8.22 Social CPE (Cost Per Engagement)
Measuring Worth
Earned CPMs
Total Earned ImpressionsTotal Cost of Earned Coverage X 1000
Total EngagementsTotal Cost of Earned
Engagement
Cost Per Engagement
Engagement – PostRank
• Social media measurement is a discipline, not a tool; but there is no “single metric”
• Media content analysis should be supplemented by web and search analytics, sales and CRM data, survey data and other methods
• Evaluating quality and quantity is critical, just as it is with conventional media
• Measurement must focus on “conversation” and “communities” not just “coverage”
Principle #6: Social Media can and should be measured
• Understanding reach and influence is important, but existing data sources are not accessible, transparent or consistent enough to be reliable; experimentation and testing are key to success
Engagement – Google AdWords
Engagement – Google Trends
Engagement & Action – Web Analytics
PR measurement should be done in a manner that is transparent and replicable for all steps in the process, including specifying:Media Measurement:• Source of the data (print, broadcast, internet, consumer generated media) along
with criteria used for collection
Principle #7: Transparency and replicability are paramount to sound measurement
Surveys:• Methodology – sampling frame and size,
margin of error etc• Questions –should be released as asked
(wording and order)• Statistical methodology- how specific metrics
are calculated
• Analysis methodology – for example, whether human or automated, tone scale, reach to target, content analysis parameters
Activities Reach Relevance Outcomes Worth
What activitieswere performed
to achieveresults?
Did you reachyour audience?
How manyimpressions,web visits,
reports,attendees, etc.
weregenerated?
Were yourelevant to youraudience? Were
you credible? Did your ideas and messages resonate? Did
you drive conversation?
What business results did you
achieve? Awareness?
Engagement?Reputation?
Leads? Sales? Loyalty?
Advocacy?
What is the estimated value
of your communication
efforts?
Communications Team Marketing Team Executive Team
Quantity/Output Quality/Outtakes Business Impact Value/Efficiency
ARROW: Flexible, Integrated Measurement Framework
Activities 47 Media, Blogger & Influencer Interviews
Reach 170 Earned & Social Media Placements
Relevance 64% Earned & Social Message Penetration
Outcomes 14% Increase in Brand Engagement
Worth $4.72 Earned CPM (Cost Per 1K Impressions)
94 Facebook, YouTube, Blog & Twitter Posts
3.9M Earned & Social Media Impressions
27% Earned & Social Media Share
27% Category Sales Share
$8.22 Social CPE (Cost Per Engagement)
Light ARROW Scorecard
Full ARROW Scorecard
OK – hopefully that wasn’t too dull…To end – a bit of fun…
Data Visualisations
Data doesn’t have to be boring…
…in fact the way you represent the data
can make the difference between
whether your audience engages
with it or not.
Jonathan Harris and Sep Kamvar – We Feel Fine
Thanks for listening.
Any Questions?
Jon WadeHead of Digital, APAC – Weber Shandwick+852 9789 8973@[email protected]