Meaford Glamping · Traffic Brief for Back Forty Glamping Type of Document: Final Report Project...

Meaford Glamping Municipality of Meaford

Traffic Brief for

Back Forty Glamping

Type of Document: Final Report

Project Number: JDE – 19078

Date Submitted: October 29

th, 2019

_______________________________________ 10/29/19 John Northcote, P.Eng. Professional License #: 100124071

JD Northcote Engineering Inc. 86 Cumberland Street

Barrie, ON 705.725.4035

www.JDEngineering.ca

Meaford Glamping Back Forty Glamping

JDE-19078 Date: October 29

th, 2019

ii

Legal Notification This report was prepared by JD Northcote Engineering Inc. for the account of Back Forty Glamping. Any use which a third party makes of this report, or any reliance on or decisions to be made based on it, are the responsibility of such third parties. JD Northcote Engineering Inc. accepts no responsibility for damages, if any, suffered by any third party as a result of decisions made or actions based on this project.



th, 2019

iii

Table of Contents

1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 1

1.1 Background............................................................................................................................... 1

1.2 Study Area ................................................................................................................................ 1

1.3 Study Scope and Objectives .................................................................................................... 1

1.4 Analysis Periods ....................................................................................................................... 1

2 Information Gathering ............................................................................................................ 1

2.1 Street and Intersection Characteristics .................................................................................... 1

2.2 Local Transportation Infrastructure Improvements................................................................... 3

2.3 Transit Access .......................................................................................................................... 3

2.4 Other Developments within Study Area ................................................................................... 3

3 Proposed Development Traffic Generation and Assignment ............................................ 3

3.1 Traffic Generation ..................................................................................................................... 3

3.2 Traffic Assignment .................................................................................................................... 3

4 Intersection Operation with Proposed Development ......................................................... 5

4.1 Traffic Impact Analysis ............................................................................................................. 5

4.2 Site Access ............................................................................................................................... 5

4.3 Sight Distance Review .............................................................................................................. 5

5 Summary ................................................................................................................................. 6



th, 2019

iv

List of Tables Table 1 – Estimated Traffic Generation of Proposed Development ....................................................... 3 Table 2 – Proposed Development Traffic Distribution Summary ........................................................... 4

List of Figures Figure 1 – Proposed Site Location and Study Area ............................................................................... 1 Figure 2 – Existing Intersection Lane Configuration within Study Area ................................................. 2 Figure 3 – Traffic Assignment for Proposed Development .................................................................... 4

List of Appendices APPENDIX A – Site Plan



th, 2019

1

1 Introduction

1.1 Background

Back Forty Glamping [the Client] is proposing an outdoor retreat development located on the southeast corner of the 12

th Line / 16

th Sideroad intersection, in the Municipality of Meaford

[Municipality], Grey County [County]. The proposed development is anticipated to include five geo-domes, seven cabins and commons areas for kitchen and washrooms. The proposed development will include one full movement access driveway onto 16

th Sideroad [Site

Access]. The Client has retained JD Engineering Inc. [JD Engineering] to prepare this traffic brief in support of the proposed development.

1.2 Study Area

Figure 1 illustrates the location of the subject site and study area intersections, in relation to the surrounding area. The Site Plan, as provided by the client, is included in Appendix A. The subject site is bound by 16

th Sideroad to the north, 12

th Line to the west, existing residential

development to the east and rural lands to the south. Based on our experience with similar studies, a functional review at the 16

th Sideroad / Site Access

intersection will be analysed as part of the study.



th, 2019

1

Figure 1 – Proposed Site Location and Study Area



th, 2019

1

1.3 Study Scope and Objectives

The purpose of this study is to identify the potential impacts to traffic flow at the site access and on the surrounding roadway network. The study analysis includes the following tasks:

• Determine existing traffic volumes and circulation patterns; • Estimate the amount of traffic that would be generated by the proposed development and

assign to the roadway network;

• Identify improvement options to address operational deficiencies; • Review the available sight distance at the Site Access driveway; and • Document findings and recommendations in a final report.

1.4 Analysis Periods

The Friday afternoon [FRI PM], Saturday midday [SAT] and Sunday afternoon [SUN] peak hours have been selected as the analysis periods for this study.

2 Information Gathering

2.1 Street and Intersection Characteristics

16th

Sideroad is a two-lane local road with a rural cross-section, chipseal surface and no sidewalk. 16

th Sideroad has an unposted (assumed) speed Iimit of 80km/h and is under jurisdiction of the

Municipality.

The existing intersection spacing and lane configuration within the study area is illustrated in Figure 2.



th, 2019

2

Figure 2 – Existing Intersection Lane Configuration within Study Area



th, 2019

3

2.2 Local Transportation Infrastructure Improvements

Based on a review of the Municipality’s Capital Budget (2019) there are no planned road improvements in the study area that would impact the local traffic volumes or traffic distribution.

2.3 Transit Access

There is currently no municipal transit available in the study area.

2.4 Other Developments within Study Area

Based on a review of the Municipality’s Interactive Development Applications Map and correspondence with the Municipality, there are no other planned developments near the study area.

3 Proposed Development Traffic Generation and Assignment

3.1 Traffic Generation

The traffic generation for the subject site has been estimated based on our review of the business operations for the proposed development, as provided by the Client. Guest check-ins are anticipated to be concentrated on Friday afternoon and on Saturday morning and guest check-outs are anticipated to be concentrated on Sunday afternoons. It is anticipated the development will have maximum occupancy of 24 people. The anticipated clientele for the proposed development will likely be couples; based on this information we have estimated a maximum of 12 guest vehicles. To be conservative, we have assumed all guests will stay for one-day on the weekend and we have assumed check-in and check-out for all guests will reach maximum occupancy during all peak hours. Consequently for the FRI PM peak hour we have assumed 12 trips (12 ingress), during the SAT peak hour 24 trips (12 ingress and 12 egress) and during the SUN peak hour 24 trips (12 ingress and 12 egress). No staff or delivery trips have been assumed to occur during the peak guest check-in and check-out periods noted above. The estimated trip generation and vehicle breakdown for the proposed development in the FRI PM, SAT and SUN peak periods is summarized below in Table 11.

Table 1 – Estimated Traffic Generation of Proposed Development

Vehicle FRI PM Peak Hour SAT Peak Hour SUN Peak Hour

IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL

Automobile 12 0 12 12 12 24 12 12 24

3.2 Traffic Assignment

For the purposes of this study, it has been assumed that all traffic generated by the proposed development will be new traffic and would not be in the study area if the development was not constructed. The distribution of traffic in the study area is assumed to be based on the route travelled by guests to access the site. It is assumed that the majority of the guests would be entering from the GTHA;



th, 2019

4

consequently, we have selected the traffic distribution primarily based on the preferred route for trips entering from the GTHA. Table 3 summarizes the trip distribution for the proposed development.

Table 2 – Proposed Development Traffic Distribution Summary

Travel Direction (to/from)

Percent of Total Traffic Generation

West via 16th Sideroad 40%

East via 16th Sideroad 60%

Total 100%

Figure 3 illustrates the traffic assignment for the proposed development.

Figure 3 – Traffic Assignment for Proposed Development



th, 2019

5

4 Intersection Operation with Proposed Development

4.1 Traffic Impact Analysis

The existing traffic volume on 16th Sideroad was estimated based on a traffic survey completed by JD

Engineering on Friday August 16th, 2019. Based on our observations during the typical Friday

afternoon peak traffic period, the peak hour traffic on 16th Sideroad is estimated to be as follows:

• Westbound – 9 vph • Eastbound – 2 vph

For the most critical case, it is estimated that the proposed development will add approximately 12 FRI PM, 24 SAT and 24 SUN peak hour trips on 16

th Sideroad. The additional traffic generated by the

proposed development will not adversely affect the traffic capacity on 16th Sideroad or result in any

traffic safety issues with the study area. The existing road network can accommodate the additional traffic generated by the proposed development.

4.2 Site Access

The Site Access will operate efficiently as a full-movement access, with one-way stop control for northbound movements. A single ingress and egress lane for the Site Access will provide the necessary capacity to service the proposed development. The proposed spacing between the Site Access and the existing driveway to the east (22 metres) meets the suggested driveway spacing criteria along a local road as identified in the Transportation Association of Canada Design Guide for Canadian Roads (2017) [TAC Guidelines] Figure 8.9.2 (Driveway Spacing Guidelines – Locals and Collectors). The proposed spacing between the Site Access and 12

th Line is in excess of the suggested corner

clearance requirements for a driveway as identified in the TAC Guidelines Figure 8.8.2 (Suggested Minimum Corner Clearances to Accesses or Public Lanes at Major Intersections) – 15 metres for unsignalized condition. Consequently, there no issues with the location of the proposed Site Access driveway.

4.3 Sight Distance Review

A review of the available sight distance for the proposed Site Access was completed as part of this analysis. Although the assumed speed limit (according to the Highway Traffic Act) is 80 km/h on 16

th

Sideroad, based on our review of the existing traffic operations and the existing road condition, the section of 16

th Avenue adjacent to the subject site is expected to have operating speeds between 50

– 60 km/h, based on the existing road surface and the existing vertical curves in the road. The sight distance west of the Site Access (195 metres) is significantly greater than the minimum stopping sight distance requirements as identified in the TAC Guidelines for a design speed of 60km/h (85 metres). The sight distance east of the Site Access (88 metres) is marginally greater than the minimum stopping sight distance requirements as identified in the TAC Guidelines for a design speed of 60km/h (85 metres). As noted above, there is no posted speed limit along 16

th Sideroad. It is



th, 2019

6

recommended that a 50km/h speed limit sign is posted for westbound traffic on 16th Sideroad,

approximately 200 metres east of the subject site, to inform drivers of the speed limit in the study area.

5 Summary

Back Forty Glamping retained JD Engineering to prepare this traffic brief in support of the proposed outdoor retreat development located on the southeast corner of the 12

th Line / 16

th Sideroad

intersection, in the Municipality of Meaford. The Site Plan, as provided by the client, is included in Appendix A. This chapter summarizes the conclusions and recommendations from the study.

The proposed development is anticipated to include five geo-domes, seven cabins and commons areas for kitchen and washrooms.

1. The proposed development is expected to generate up to 12 FRI PM, 24 SAT and 24 SUN new peak hour trips in the study area.

2. An estimate of the existing traffic volume on 16th Sideroad was obtained by JD Engineering

on Friday August 16th, 2019.

3. The proposed road network provides the necessary capacity to service the proposed development.

4. The proposed Site Access will operate efficiently with one-way stop control for northbound movements. A single lane for ingress and egress movements at the Site Access driveway will provide the necessary capacity to convey the traffic volume generated by the proposed development.

5. The sight distance available for the Site Access driveway meets the minimum stopping sight distance requirements.

6. It is recommended that a 50km/h speed limit sign is posted for westbound traffic on 16th Sideroad, approximately 200 metres east of the subject site, to inform drivers of the speed limit in the study area.

7. In summary the proposed development will not cause any operational issues and will not add significant delay or congestion to the local roadway network.

2

8

8

.

9

1

2

9

3

.

8

5

2

9

2

.

2

9

2

9

7

.

4

7

2

9

0

.

9

9

2

9

1

.

4

6

2

9

3

.

0

3

2

9

2

.

5

5

2

9

2

.

9

0

2

9

3

.

1

6

2

9

3

.

5

3

2

9

3

.

7

4

2

9

3

.

9

5

2

9

4

.

4

1

2

9

4

.

6

7

2

9

5

.

2

2

2

9

5

.

4

6

2

9

5

.

6

4

2

9

5

.

7

8

2

9

6

.

0

5

2

9

5

.

9

2

2

9

6

.

1

92

9

6

.

1

5

2

9

6

.

4

4

2

9

6

.

3

9

2

9

6

.

4

0

2

9

6

.

5

4

2

9

6

.

6

6

2

9

6

.

7

0

2

9

7

.

1

2

2

9

7

.

2

4

2

9

7

.

0

7

2

9

7

.

0

5

3

0

3

.

1

0

3

0

3

.

0

4

3

0

2

.

6

3

3

0

2

.

4

2

3

0

4

.

6

5

3

0

4

.

3

4

3

0

4

.

3

3

3

0

5

.

1

3

3

0

4

.

9

0

3

0

5

.

3

1

3

0

5

.

0

5

3

0

4

.

3

1

3

0

6

.

0

6

3

0

6

.

1

1

3

0

3

.

1

1

3

0

3

.

4

6

3

0

3

.

5

9

3

0

3

.

4

4

3

0

3

.

4

3

3

0

3

.

4

6

3

0

3

.

5

1

3

0

3

.

5

4

3

0

3

.

6

03

0

3

.

2

3

3

0

3

.

1

6

3

0

4

.

8

2

3

0

4

.

6

5

3

0

4

.

2

9

3

0

4

.

3

2

3

0

4

.

6

6

3

0

5

.

1

0

3

0

5

.

0

8

3

0

5

.

0

9

3

0

5

.

1

0

3

0

5

.

0

7

3

0

5

.

0

7

3

0

5

.

0

6

3

0

5

.

0

7

3

0

4

.

6

6

3

0

4

.

6

4

3

0

4

.

6

7

3

0

4

.

6

6

3

0

4

.

4

8

3

0

4

.

4

9

3

0

4

.

4

7

3

0

4

.

1

9

3

0

4

.

7

1

3

0

4

.

6

1

3

0

4

.

8

6

3

0

4

.

8

7

3

0

5

.

5

1

3

0

5

.

4

1

3

0

4

.

5

1

3

0

5

.

0

9

3

0

3

.

8

1

2

9

6

.

6

9

2

9

6

.

8

5

3

0

3

.

0

1

3

0

2

.

9

8

3

0

1

.

4

4

3

0

1

.

4

6

3

0

1

.

5

3

3

0

1

.

3

8

3

0

1

.

3

8

3

0

4

.

4

4

3

0

4

.

4

9

3

0

4

.

4

8

3

0

4

.

5

3

3

0

3

.

9

5

EXISTING

WATERCOURSE

E

X

.

H

O

U

S

E

EXISTING

DRIVEWAY

EXISTING FIELD ENTRANCE

APPROXIMATE LIMIT OF

GSCA REGULATED AREA


GSCA REGULATED AREA

30.0m SETBACK FROM

EXISTING WATERCOURSE

12 - 6.0x3.0m PARKING

SPACES + SPACE FOR

ADDITIONAL 4 VEHICLES

6.0m WIDE GRAVEL

DRIVEWAY ACCESS

EXISTING TREELINE

EXISTING TREELINE

16TH SIDEROAD

1

2

T

H

L

I

N

E

CEN

TRELI

NE O

F RO

AD

APPROXIMATE PROPERTY

BOUNDARY

BATHROOM BUILDING,

HOUSING WELL EQUIPMENT

AND TREATMENT

A-FRAME STRUCTURES

GEODESIC DOMES,

37sq.m EACH

EXISTING FIELD

ENTRANCE TO BE

WIDENED TO 6.0m c/w

9.0m TURNING RADII

GATE

GATE

OPEN PAVILLION KITCHEN

PROPOSED WELL (APPROXIMATE

LOCATION, BY OTHERS)

PROPOSED SEPTIC TANK AND

BED, APPROXIMATE SIZE AND

LOCATION (BY OTHERS)

1

2

3

4

5

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

PROPOSED 125mmØ SANITARY

LINE @ MIN 1.00% TO SEPTIC

TANK

PROPOSED 50mmØ WATER LINE TO

SERVICE BATHROOM, KITCHEN AND

GEODESIC DOMES. INDIVIDUAL

DOME SERVICES TO BE 25mmØ

2

9

0

2

9

5

3

0

0

3

0

5

2

8

9

.

5

2

9

0

.

5

2

9

1

.

0

2

9

1

.

5

2

9

2

.

0

2

9

2

.

5

2

9

3

.

0

2

9

3

.

5

294.0

2

9

4

.

5

2

9

5

.

5

2

9

6

.

0

2

9

6

.

5

2

9

7

.

0

2

9

7

.

5

2

9

8

.

0

2

9

8

.

5

2

9

9

.

0

2

9

9

.

5

3

0

0

.

5

3

0

1

.

0

3

0

1

.

5

3

0

2

.

0

3

0

2

.

5

3

0

3

.0

3

0

3

.

5

3

0

4

.

0

3

0

4

.

5

3

0

5

.

5

3

0

6

.

0

3

0

6

.

5

3

0

0

2

9

9

.

5

3

0

0

.

5

3

0

1

.

0

3

0

1

.

5

3

0

2

.

0

3

0

2

.

5

3

0

3

.

0

3

0

3

.

5

3

0

4

.

0

EXISTING

WELL

EXISTING SEPTIC AT

REAR OF EXISTING

HOUSE



TANK

MDS SETBACK LINE AS PER

MUNICIPALITY OF MEAFORD

0 20 40 60m

1:1,000

KEY PLAN

File: c:\U

sers\kevin\D

esktop\capes engineering\Projects\2019-052 16th sideroad m

eaford\D

raw

ings\03_ProductionD

wg\2019-052 G

eneral Site Plan.dw

g D

ate Plotted: N

ovem

ber 19, 2019 - 3:11 PM

Client

1. This drawing is the exclusive property of CAPES Engineering Ltd. The reproduction of

any part without express written consent of this Corporation is strictly prohibited.

2. The contractor shall verify all dimensions, levels, and datums on site and report any

discrepancies or omissions to CAPES Engineering Ltd. prior to construction.

3. This drawing is to be read and understood in conjunction with all other plans and

documents applicable to this project.

Notes

Scale

Drawing No.Designed Checked Date

Rev No.Project No.

355310 BLUE MOUNTAINS - EUPHRASIA TOWNLINE

CLARKSBURG, ON N0H 1J0

TEL: 705-994-4818

MR. SCOTT MCINTOSH

145166 SIDEROAD 16

MEAFORD, ON

BACK FORTY GLAMPING 145166 16th SIDEROAD,

MEAFORD ON

GENERAL SITE PLAN

K. GRIFFIN C. CAPES

2019-052

19/08/14

1

C1

NoIssue / Revision

Date Auth

1 ISSUED FOR ZBA19/11/19

CC

H

I

G

H

W

A

Y

2

6

S

Y

D

E

N

H

A

M

-

S

T

. V

I

N

C

E

N

T

T

O

W

N

L

I

N

E

1

2

T

H

L

I

N

E

1

1

T

H

L

I

N

E

1

6

S

I

D

E

R

O

A

D

SUBJECT SITE

APPROXIMATE FINISHED FLOOR GRADES:

KITCHEN PAVILLION = 295.65

BATHROOM = 295.65

GEODESIC DOME 1 = 299.65





A-FRAME STRUCTURE 1 = 297.05







2

8

8

.

9

1

2

9

3

.

8

5

2

9

2

.

2

9

2

9

7

.

4

7

2

9

0

.

9

9

2

9

1

.

4

6

2

9

3

.

0

3

2

9

2

.

5

5

2

9

2

.

9

0

2

9

3

.

1

6

2

9

3

.

5

3

2

9

3

.

7

4

2

9

3

.

9

5

2

9

4

.

4

1

2

9

4

.

6

7

2

9

5

.

2

2

2

9

5

.

4

6

2

9

5

.

6

4

2

9

5

.

7

8

2

9

6

.

0

5

2

9

5

.

9

2

2

9

6

.

1

92

9

6

.

1

5

2

9

6

.

4

4

2

9

6

.

3

9

2

9

6

.

4

0

2

9

6

.

5

4

2

9

6

.

6

6

2

9

6

.

7

0

2

9

7

.

1

2

2

9

7

.

2

4

2

9

7

.

0

7

2

9

7

.

0

5

3

0

3

.

1

0

3

0

3

.

0

4

3

0

2

.

6

3

3

0

2

.

4

2

3

0

4

.

6

5

3

0

4

.

3

4

3

0

4

.

3

3

3

0

5

.

1

3

3

0

4

.

9

0

3

0

5

.

3

1

3

0

5

.

0

5

3

0

4

.

3

1

3

0

6

.

0

6

3

0

6

.

1

1

3

0

3

.

1

1

3

0

3

.

4

6

3

0

3

.

5

9

3

0

3

.

4

4

3

0

3

.

4

3

3

0

3

.

4

6

3

0

3

.

5

1

3

0

3

.

5

4

3

0

3

.

6

03

0

3

.

2

3

3

0

3

.

1

6

3

0

4

.

8

2

3

0

4

.

6

5

3

0

4

.

2

9

3

0

4

.

3

2

3

0

4

.

6

6

3

0

5

.

1

0

3

0

5

.

0

8

3

0

5

.

0

9

3

0

5

.

1

0

3

0

5

.

0

7

3

0

5

.

0

7

3

0

5

.

0

6

3

0

5

.

0

7

3

0

4

.

6

6

3

0

4

.

6

4

3

0

4

.

6

7

3

0

4

.

6

6

3

0

4

.

4

8

3

0

4

.

4

9

3

0

4

.

4

7

3

0

4

.

1

9

3

0

4

.

7

1

3

0

4

.

6

1

3

0

4

.

8

6

3

0

4

.

8

7

3

0

5

.

5

1

3

0

5

.

4

1

3

0

4

.

5

1

3

0

5

.

0

9

3

0

3

.

8

1

2

9

6

.

6

9

2

9

6

.

8

5

3

0

3

.

0

1

3

0

2

.

9

8

3

0

1

.

4

4

3

0

1

.

4

6

3

0

1

.

5

3

3

0

1

.

3

8

3

0

1

.

3

8

3

0

4

.

4

4

3

0

4

.

4

9

3

0

4

.

4

8

3

0

4

.

5

3

3

0

3

.

9

5

EXISTING

WATERCOURSE

E

X

.

H

O

U

S

E

EXISTING

DRIVEWAY

EXISTING FIELD ENTRANCE


GSCA REGULATED AREA


GSCA REGULATED AREA

30.0m SETBACK FROM

EXISTING WATERCOURSE

12 - 6.0x3.0m PARKING

SPACES + SPACE FOR

ADDITIONAL 4 VEHICLES

6.0m WIDE GRAVEL

DRIVEWAY ACCESS

EXISTING TREELINE

EXISTING TREELINE

16TH SIDEROAD

1

2

T

H

L

I

N

E

CEN

TRELI

NE O

F RO

AD

APPROXIMATE PROPERTY

BOUNDARY

BATHROOM BUILDING,

HOUSING WELL EQUIPMENT

AND TREATMENT

A-FRAME STRUCTURES

GEODESIC DOMES,

37sq.m EACH

EXISTING FIELD

ENTRANCE TO BE

WIDENED TO 6.0m c/w

9.0m TURNING RADII

GATE

GATE

OPEN PAVILLION KITCHEN

PROPOSED WELL (APPROXIMATE

LOCATION, BY OTHERS)

PROPOSED SEPTIC TANK AND

BED, APPROXIMATE SIZE AND

LOCATION (BY OTHERS)

1

2

3

4

5

1

2

3

4

5

6

7



TANK

PROPOSED 50mmØ WATER LINE TO

SERVICE BATHROOM, KITCHEN AND

GEODESIC DOMES. INDIVIDUAL

DOME SERVICES TO BE 25mmØ

2

9

0

2

9

5

3

0

0

3

0

5

2

8

9

.

5

2

9

0

.

5

2

9

1

.

0

2

9

1

.

5

2

9

2

.

0

2

9

2

.

5

2

9

3

.

0

2

9

3

.

5

294.0

2

9

4

.

5

2

9

5

.

5

2

9

6

.

0

2

9

6

.

5

2

9

7

.

0

2

9

7

.

5

2

9

8

.

0

2

9

8

.

5

2

9

9

.

0

2

9

9

.

5

3

0

0

.

5

3

0

1

.

0

3

0

1

.

5

3

0

2

.

0

3

0

2

.

5

3

0

3

.0

3

0

3

.

5

3

0

4

.

0

3

0

4

.

5

3

0

5

.

5

3

0

6

.

0

3

0

6

.

5

3

0

0

2

9

9

.

5

3

0

0

.

5

3

0

1

.

0

3

0

1

.

5

3

0

2

.

0

3

0

2

.

5

3

0

3

.

0

3

0

3

.

5

3

0

4

.

0

EXISTING

WELL

EXISTING SEPTIC AT

REAR OF EXISTING

HOUSE



TANK

MDS SETBACK LINE AS PER

MUNICIPALITY OF MEAFORD

0 20 40 60m

1:1,000

KEY PLAN

File: c:\U

sers\kevin\D

esktop\capes engineering\Projects\2019-052 16th sideroad m

eaford\D

raw

ings\03_ProductionD

wg\2019-052 G

eneral Site Plan.dw

g D

ate Plotted: N

ovem

ber 19, 2019 - 3:11 PM

Client

1. This drawing is the exclusive property of CAPES Engineering Ltd. The reproduction of

any part without express written consent of this Corporation is strictly prohibited.

2. The contractor shall verify all dimensions, levels, and datums on site and report any

discrepancies or omissions to CAPES Engineering Ltd. prior to construction.

3. This drawing is to be read and understood in conjunction with all other plans and

documents applicable to this project.

Notes

Scale

Drawing No.Designed Checked Date

Rev No.Project No.

355310 BLUE MOUNTAINS - EUPHRASIA TOWNLINE

CLARKSBURG, ON N0H 1J0

TEL: 705-994-4818

MR. SCOTT MCINTOSH

145166 SIDEROAD 16

MEAFORD, ON

BACK FORTY GLAMPING 145166 16th SIDEROAD,

MEAFORD ON

GENERAL SITE PLAN WITH AERIAL PHOTO

K. GRIFFIN C. CAPES

2019-052

19/08/14

1

C1

NoIssue / Revision

Date Auth

1 ISSUED FOR ZBA19/11/19

CC

APPROXIMATE FINISHED FLOOR GRADES:

KITCHEN PAVILLION = 295.65

BATHROOM = 295.65













H

I

G

H

W

A

Y

2

6

S

Y

D

E

N

H

A

M

-

S

T

. V

I

N

C

E

N

T

T

O

W

N

L

I

N

E

1

2

T

H

L

I

N

E

1

1

T

H

L

I

N

E

1

6

S

I

D

E

R

O

A

D

SUBJECT SITE



th, 2019

7

Appendix A – Site Plan

Sheets and ViewsC1 GENERAL SITE PLANC1 GENERAL SITE PLAN WITH AERIAL PHOTO

Meaford Glamping · Traffic Brief for Back Forty Glamping Type of Document: Final Report Project...

Documents

Transcript of Meaford Glamping · Traffic Brief for Back Forty Glamping Type of Document: Final Report Project...