Me It 1004

download Me It 1004

of 27

Transcript of Me It 1004

  • 8/3/2019 Me It 1004

    1/27

    Presented By

    Ms. Pratibha P. Chavan

    (MEIT1004)

    Under Guidance

    Prof. V. S. Deshpande

  • 8/3/2019 Me It 1004

    2/27

    Introduction

    Congestion Control Mechanisms Methods of Congestion Detection

    Problem Statement

    Motivation

    Objectives

    Literature Survey

    Proposed Work

    Conclusion References

    2

  • 8/3/2019 Me It 1004

    3/27

    WSN consist of small microcontroller fitted with

    sensors and some means of communication radio.

    In a WSN, multiple sensors try to send data to a base

    station or sinkthis could result in congestion.

    3Cont.

    Sink

    Sensor field

    Sensing node

    Sensor nodes

  • 8/3/2019 Me It 1004

    4/27

    Congestion in WSNs has a direct impact on energy efficiency

    and application QoS.

    Congestion Control studies how to recover from the

    congestion.

    How to ensurefairand efficienttransmission rates for each

    nodes in a sensor network?

    4

    Src1 Src2

    Sink

  • 8/3/2019 Me It 1004

    5/27

    Congestion Control method needs to be lightweight,

    fair and efficient.

    There are three mechanisms that can deal with this

    problem:-- Congestion detection

    -- Congestion notification

    -- Rate adjustment

    5

  • 8/3/2019 Me It 1004

    6/27

    Buffer occupancy

    Check ts/ta for congested system, where ts is packet

    service time and ta is packet inter arrival time. Channel Occupancy

    Reporting Rate (RR)

    6

  • 8/3/2019 Me It 1004

    7/27

    Design and implement mechanism to mitigate

    Congestion in WSNs.

    7

  • 8/3/2019 Me It 1004

    8/27

    Congestion in WSNs can lead to buffer overflow,

    wastage of resources and delay or loss of critical

    information from the sensor Network. Hence, there is

    need to study the problem of congestion in WSNs and

    it is necessary to carry out congestion control which

    detects congestion precisely and regulates it fairly.

    8

  • 8/3/2019 Me It 1004

    9/27

  • 8/3/2019 Me It 1004

    10/27

    To minimize packet loss ratio To maximize throughput

    To increase PDR

    To minimize energy consumption

    To achieve weighted fairness for different class of

    traffic

    To control node wise flow

    To find out the optimized buffer window size

    10

  • 8/3/2019 Me It 1004

    11/27

    An Energy Efficient Congestion Control Protocol for

    WSNs (EECC), 2009 IEEE

    Congestion Control and Fairness in WSNs (CCF), 2009

    IEEE

    Congestion-Aware and Rate-Controlled Reliable

    Transport in WSNs (CRRT), 2009 IEICE

    Upstream Hop-by-Hop Congestion Control in WSNs

    (UHCC), 2009 IEEE

    11Cont.

  • 8/3/2019 Me It 1004

    12/27

    Advantages: Average energy consumed by the nodes is less.

    EECC increases Packet delivery Ratio (PDR).

    EECC increases throughput in terms no. of packets received.

    EECC protocol achieves congestion control along with energysaving.

    Disadvantages:

    An efficient MAC protocol is needed to work in power saving

    mode.

    Sink has to perform re-clustering in case of changes in time

    series reading of nodes.

    12Cont.

  • 8/3/2019 Me It 1004

    13/27

    13Cont.

  • 8/3/2019 Me It 1004

    14/27

    14

  • 8/3/2019 Me It 1004

    15/27

    Advantages: CCF supports multiple concurrent applications.

    CCF is highly robust to changes in underlying topology and

    routing dynamics.

    CCF ensures efficient use of network resources. It reduces oscillations, provides stability.

    CCF adjusts its aggressiveness according to the spare

    bandwidth in the network.

    It assigns fair and efficient rate to each node.

    Disadvantages:

    It considers feedback delays.

    15Cont.

  • 8/3/2019 Me It 1004

    16/27

  • 8/3/2019 Me It 1004

    17/27

    17

  • 8/3/2019 Me It 1004

    18/27

    Advantages: CRRT increases the PDR and transmission efficiency.

    It achieves optimal rate.

    It assigns rate to the flows fairly.

    CRRT has a high energy efficiency.

    It has a high degree of fairness.

    It avoids congestion drops both locally and centrally.

    Disadvantages:

    It uses centralized rate control mechanism.

    18Cont.

  • 8/3/2019 Me It 1004

    19/27

    19

  • 8/3/2019 Me It 1004

    20/27

    Advantages:

    UHCC achieves higher throughput.

    It achieves better priority-based fairness.

    It has lower packet loss ratio than CCF and PCCP.

    It mitigates congestion hop by hop so faster response.

    Disadvantages:

    It considers source traffic priority on all conditions.

    20

  • 8/3/2019 Me It 1004

    21/27

    21

  • 8/3/2019 Me It 1004

    22/27

    22

  • 8/3/2019 Me It 1004

    23/27

    Proposed algorithm uses Buffer Occupancy as a method ofCongestion Detection.

    Congestion Control is performed by Reporting Rate

    adjustments.

    Algorithm has to be implemented on Linux based NS2

    simulator.

    Algorithm considers many parameters may like higher

    energy efficiency, throughput , fairness and many more.

    The orientation of graphs may vary if all parameters are

    considered.

    23

  • 8/3/2019 Me It 1004

    24/27

    In WSNs, Congestion may cause packet loss, delay

    and energy waste due to a large no. of

    retransmissions and packet drops. So, it is necessary

    to carry out Congestion Control which detectscongestion precisely and regulates it fairly

    24

  • 8/3/2019 Me It 1004

    25/27

    [1] Guangxue Wang and Kai Liu, UHCC: Upstream Hop-by Hop CongestionControl in Wireless Sensor Networks,IEEE 2009.

    [2] V. S. Felix Enigo and Dr. V. Ramchandran, EECC: Energy Efficient

    Congestion Control Protocol for Wireless SensorNetworks, IEEE 2009.

    [3] Swastik Brahma, Mainak Chatterjee and Kevin Kwiat, CCF: Congestion

    Control and Fairness in Wireless Sensor Networks, IEEE 2009.

    [4] Muhammad M. Alam and Choong Seon Hong, CRRT: Congestion-Aware

    and Rate-Controlled Reliable Transport in Wireless Sensor Networks, IEICE

    2009.

    [5] Chonggang Wang, Kazem Sohraby, Victor Lawrence, Bo Li and Yueming

    Hu, Priority-based Congestion control in Wireless Sensor Networks, in

    Proc. ofIEEE 2006.

    Cont

  • 8/3/2019 Me It 1004

    26/27

    [6] B. Hull, K. Jamieson and H. Balakrishnan, Mitigating congestion in wirelesssensor networks, in Proc. ofACM Sensys04.

    [7] C.-T. Ee and R. Bajcsy, Congestion control and fairness for many-to-onerouting in sensor networks, in Proc. ofACM Sensys04.

    [8] Y. Sankarasubramaniam, O. Akan, I. Akyildiz, ESRT: Event-to-Sink Reliable

    Transport in Wireless Sensor Networks, in Proc. ofACM MobiHoc03.

    [9] C.-Y. Wan, S.B. Eisenman, A. T. Campbell, CODA: Congestion detection and

    avoidance in sensor networks, in Proc.ACM SenSys, Nov.2003.

    [10] Kazem Sohraby, Daniel Minoli and Taieb Znati, Wireless Sensor Networks,

    Technology, Protocols, and Applications, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2007.

  • 8/3/2019 Me It 1004

    27/27

    Thank you..

    ??