ME 481 Mechanical Engineering Design Projects Project Management.
-
Upload
holly-dalton -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of ME 481 Mechanical Engineering Design Projects Project Management.
ME 481Mechanical Engineering
Design Projects
Project Management
Many of our BSME graduates early in their careers find themselves
managing projects.
Following years of project management, a good number go on to
program management.
It’s What ME’s do …
Effectively and efficiently using the resources available to bring the
project to a successful conclusion.
Project Management
• Time• Money• Facilities and Equipment• People
Resources
• Once it’s gone, it’s gone
• Manage project time w/ Gantt chart
• Manage individual time w/ schedule/calendar
• 2nd most difficult resource to manage
Time
• A graphical representation of the duration of tasks against the progression of time
• Use for scheduling & planning (Begin with course calendar)
• List tasks and their time periods
• Living document
• Identify critical time paths
Gantt Chart
Typical Gantt Chart
From: http://www.jiscinfonet.ac.uk/InfoKits/infokit-related-files/gantt-chart-pic/view
• Progress• Problems• Plan
Weekly Meetings
• Financial Planning• Budget Tracking• Budget OveragesAny projects that will expend more than $1000 must provide a rationale to their faculty advisor, who must submit a budget overage request to Dr. R.
Money
Budget Report
http://www.egr.msu.edu/classes/me481/radcliff/Docs/Course/BudgetReport.xls
• Computers & Data Projectors• Digital Cameras• Computer Software• Shared Computer Drives• Machine Shop• Meeting Rooms - Teleconferencing• ME IPL (Industrial Projects Lab)• Video Conferencing
Facilities and Equipment
• Professional Advisor• Faculty Advisor• Other Faculty• Dr. R.• Jill Bielawski• Roy Bailiff• Craig Gunn• Software Consultants
People
• Act professionally• Communicate• Maintain high morale• Organize a fair workload
Identify major groups of tasks
PeopleYour Student Design Team
Major Task Groups
• Liaison– Communication
• Logistics– Order and Order Tracking
• Planning– Gantt Chart, Meeting Chair
• Reports & Records– Web, Network files, Report Follow-up
Your First Team Task:Define The Problem
• A good Problem Definition is– A set of REQUIREMENTS for good solution – A set of SPECIFICATIONS for good solutions
• A good Problem Definition allows– UNAMBIGUOUS SELECTION of the best
solution to THE problem from a set of possible solutions.
Definition Parameters(see Design Parameters.pdf on the web)
• 26 are listed… Don’t use them all
• Pick a smaller relevant set
Function/performance , Product cost , Delivery date , Quantity , Environmental issues , Safety , Quality , Energy consumption , Reliability , Maintenance , Mechanical loading , Size , Weight , Spatial constraints , Aesthetics , Transportation and packaging , Personnel , Service life , Noise radiation , Operating instructions , Human factors , Health issues , Government regulations , Shelf-life storage , Operating costs , Environmental conditions , …
Bad DefinitionThe design must be
LightInexpensiveSafeSmall Easily usedAsthetically pleasing… (The list is long)
These are unusable to evaluate & rank potential solutions because they do not allow unambiguous selection of the best design
Better Definition …The design must• be lightweight. Acceptable designs will weigh
less than 5 pounds. Design quality is inversely related weight measured in pounds. (W < 1 lb => 5, W>10 lb => 1 in decision matrix)
• Be inexpensive. Acceptable designs will cost less than $9.59 to produce. Design quality is inversely related to manufacturing cost in US dollars ($).(Cost < $1=> 5, Cost>$10 => 1 in decision matrix)
Definitions• Include both
– Constraints: Limits of measurable performance qualities
– Objectives: Statement of what measurably objectively changes as solution quality changes.
• May be Qualitative or Quantitative– BUT all elements must be unambiguous– DEFINE Qualitative Scale
Qualitative Scale
On a 1-5 point Scale … (You can do better)
5 Best in Class performance
4 Better than 90% of Competitors
5 Better than 75% of Competitors
2 Better than 50% of Competitors
5 Worst in Class performance
The key… Define how you will evaluate solutions BEFORE you develop them