MCCLINTOCK TOWNSHIP, HALIBURTON COUNTY, ONTARIO W.C. … · 2017-01-16 · PETER FISCHER Rock Units...

31E07NW0018 OP91-156 MCCLINTOCK 010

W.C. ELLERTNGTON CLAIM GROUPS MCCLINTOCK TOWNSHIP, HALIBURTON COUNTY, ONTARIO

Report on

VLP-EM Surveys performed by W.C. Ellerington

and

Geological Mapping performed by P. Pischer

by

Peter Fischer, PhD, PGAC

November 1991

31E07NWOO18 OP91-156 MCCLINTOCK 01 OC

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PAGE

INTRODUCTIONGeneral l

Location and Access l

Physiography l

Previous Work 4

CURRENT SURVEY 5

Objective 5

Survey Control 5

GEOLOGY 5

Regional Geological Setting 5

Geology of Individual Claim Groups 3

Structure an Lithe-logical Succession 3

Bright Lake Claims 3

Claim 1156309 9

4-Claim Group, 1040301, 1040373, 1040374, 1126088 9

Metamorphism l Q

Lithology 10

General \O

Ultramafic Rocks 10

Bright Lake Claims 10

Olivine Pyroxenite 11

Feldspathic Pyroxenite 11

Hornblendite 11

4-Claim Group 11

Mafic Gneiss 12

Intermediate Gneiss 12

Felsic-Intermediate Gneiss (with porphyroblastic garnet) 13

Felsic Gneiss 13

Pegmatite 13

Economic Geology 15

Litho-Geochemistry 15

GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS 15

Magnetometer 15

VLP-EM Surveys 16

DIAMOND DRILLING 18

SOIL-GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY 18

CONCLUSIONS 19

RECOMMENDATIONS 20

LIST OF REFERENCES 21

List of Figures Page

Figure l Location of Survey Areas 2

Figure 2 Location of Claim Groups 3

Figure 3 Table of Rock Types 5

Figure 4 Comparative Table of Rock Types for Correlation with Map 7

of Chris Marmont

Figure 5 AFM Diagram to illustrate Major Oxide Composition of 14

Rock Types

List of Maps

Map l Geology of W.C. Ellerington Claim Groups. Mcclintock Township,

Haliburton County, Ontario. Bright Lake Claims 1008780, 1040261

Map 2 Geology of W.C. Ellerington Claim Groups. Mcclintock Township ,

Haliburton County, Ontario. Claim 1156309.

Map 3 Geology of W.C. Ellerington Claim Groups, Mcclintock Township,

Haliburton County, Ontario. Claims 1040301, 1040373, 1040374,

1126088.

Map 4 VLF-EM Survey of W.C. Ellerington Claim Groups. Mcclintock

Township, Haliburton County, Ontario. Bright Lake Claims

1008780, 1040261.


Township, Haliburton County, Ontario. Claim 1156309.


Township, Haliburton County, Ontario. Claims 1040301, 1040373,

1040374, 1126088.

APPENDICES

Appendix A Description of Samples. Stereo-Microscope and Thin Section

Descriptions

Appendix B Chemical Analyses

Appendix C Diamond Drill Record

Appendix D Soil Geochemical Survey

-1-GEOLOGY OF

W.C. ELLER1NGTON CLAIM GROUPS, MCCLINTOCK TOWNSHIP, HALIBURTON COUNTY,

ONTARIO

INTRODUCTION

General

During the summer and fall of 1991 geological and geophysical work was

performed on 7 mineral claims in Mcclintock Twp., County o Halibury,

Ontario. Geological mapping was performed by P. Fischer of Aurora,

Ontario, the ground-geophysical work was done by Mr. W.C. Ellerington of

Dorset, Ontario, who is the holder of the mineral claims. This report

describes the results of both the geological and ground-geophysical work

performed in 1991.

Figures l and 2 show the location of the claims. The claims are as

follows:

Claim Cone. Lot Half

S.O. 1008780 12 20 S

1040261 11 20 N

1040301 7 10 S

1040373 7 9 N

1040374 7 9 S

1126088 7 10 N

1156309 9 20 S

Location and Access

The 7 claims occur as 3 separate groups:

a) 2 contiguous claims in Concession 11, 12, Lot 20, accessible by a

4 km ATV road from Highway 60, 3 - 4 km east of Oxtongue Lake.

b) One single Claim, Concession 9, Lot 20.

c) 4 contiguous claims in Concession 7, Lot 9 and 10.

b) and c) are both accessible by respectively a 5 km and 6 km ATV road

that starts at McFadden Lake from a regional paved road serving Fletcher

Lake and Livingstone Lakes.

Physiography

The claims are located in a hilly, hardwood-covered area. Hill tops are

several tens of metres above valleys, slopes are gentle to steep but in

places 5 - 15 m vertical cliffs occur. Outcrop conditions are moderate to

poor. Glacial overburden on hills and slopes ranges probably between 0.5

and 5 m. In swampy depressions, which generally trend northeast,

overburden is expected to be up to tens of metres deep.

-2-

LOCATION OF SURVEY AREA

Scale : 1 - 800,000Figure 1

O)

(L D

O

(T Ou. oOo

CM

S

-4-

Previous Work

Previous exploration work performed in the area was summarized in an excellent manner by Marmont (1990) and is summarized from his report in form of a table.

1940s Discovery of a Cu-Ni sulphide showing by N. Goldie in Cone. 9,Lot 18, Cone. 10, Lot 17.

1956-1957 Midrim Mining Co. Ltd.Geochem, MAG, EM.

1957 Mr. W.C. ElleringtonTrenching, diamond drilling. 0.27X Cu, 0.2 X Ni over 30 ft, including 0.7 X Cu, 1.06X Ni over 6 ft. l DDH: 0.2 X Cu, 1.36X Ni over 15 ft.

1959 Slocan van Roy Mines Ltd.Geological Mapping, 11 diamond drill holes, 2981 ft of drilling. Gabbro, diorite, pegmatite, minor py, po, cpy.

1971 Paraike Mines Ltd.IP Survey, geological mappping: Granitic rocks, minor lenses of norite. Drilling.

1987 Claim staking (49 claims) by several parties, over known Cu-Ni- showings.

1988 Airborne geophysical survey.

1988 - 91 Staking of aditional claims in surrounding area.

1989 Mr. Ellerington and others.Air borne survey: Mag, VLF EM. Identification of several magnetic units interpreted as mafic-ultramafic units, possibly on strike with that which hosts the Cu-Ni showing. Identification of VLP EM conductors. Short, random orientation. Ground VLF EM surveys for verification.

1990 Mr. SwainProspecting of several claims, logging of l DDH by Chris Marmont. Prospecting established 2 distinct environments:a) Mafic and ultramafic rocks,b) layered gneisses, including graphitic, pyritic metapelites,

calc-silicates, IF, in part in a ductile shear zone.

1990 Mr. ElleringtonDiamond drilling and VLF-EM survey. Geological mapping by Chris Marmont. Diamond drilling (106 ft), approx. 5 km south of the Cu-Ni showing, of a pyrrhotite-bearing, gabbroic, neritic rock encountered no significant sulphide mineralization. Interesting zones of silification and K-feldspar occurrence were noted.

-5-

Geological mapping in the Hardwood Lake claim group established a

relatively thin unit of mafic gneiss (estimated 60 m) and minor

Fe-sulphide. Drilling of the unit intersected norite and diorite

and an interesting alteration zone.One good VLP conductor was associated with a graphite unit and

coincides with an air-borne EM anomaly.

CURRENT SURVEY

Objective

There are two objectives for the present survey:1. To prospect the claims and to map the local geology in order to

assess the rock types for possible economic metal concentrations,

2. To provide a framework of geological observations which might serve

to explain ground-magnetic anomalies and VLF-EM conductors outlined by Mr.

Elleringtons work.

Survey Control

Control lines were cut and picketted for each claim by Mr. Ellerington and

assistants using hip chain and compass. Control lines are oriented

parallel to either north-south claim lines (group of 4 claims) or parallel

to east-west claim lines (3 other claims), the spacing between control

line is a nominal 100 m. In most areas with outcrops unpicketted fill-in

traverses were run to arrive, if possible, at a trverse coverage of 50 m

intervals. In some cases control lines were terminated at large marsh

areas. Outcrop between lines were located using compass and hip chain. One

land survey point was used to tie in the f l post of claim SO 1008780

using a theodolite and a steel chain. As a result of this transit survey

the f l post was re-positioned

GEOLOGY

Regional Geological Setting

The geological setting of Mcclintock Twp., as expertly summarized by

Marmont (1990), has, after earlier work by Freeman (1979) and Lumbers

(unpubl.), been redefined mainly on the basis of structural work by

Davidson and co-workers (1882 - 86).

The area is part of the Central Gneiss Belt of the Grenville Metamorphic

Province. The area studied is part of the Algonquin Domain, one of

several, large, structurally determined domains separated from each other

by linear boundary zones which are large shear zones made up of a variety

of highly deofrmed, granulite facies rocks. Insights by Davidson, based on

his recent work, outline a structurally extremely complex, deep crustal

history of the granulitic rocks which makes it very difficult if not

impossible to assign them to certain protoliths. Only certain unequivocal

- 6 -

COMPOSITION

1 Felsic

2 Intermediate

3 Mafic

4 Ultramafic

TEXTURE

a massive

b foliated

c strongly schistose

d banded

e recumbent folding

f porphyroblastic

g Augen Texture

h mafic blotches

Grain Size

ex. very fine grained

A fine grained

*M medium grained

f coarse grained

FIGURE 3 Table of Lithologies.

-7-

FIGURE A

COMPARATIVE TABLE OF ROCK TYPES FOR CORRELATION WITH MAP OF

CHRIS MARMONT

CHRIS MARMONT Rock Units

PETER FISCHER Rock Units

7 granitic pegmatite

6 gabbro

6a opx-bearing gabbro 6b quartz diorite 6c peridotite

5 amphibolite

4 annrthositic gabbro

3 quartz monzonite, raonzo- granite, quartz-monzo- diorite

2 pelitic gneiss

l semi-pelitic gneiss

la biotite-richIb plag. porphyrobl.le garnet porphyrobl.

Felsic, massive, coarse grained

3a Mafic, massive

3a, b Mafic, massive or fol.2/33 Intermed.-mafic, massive or fol.Aa Ultramafic, massive

i-iafic, fol., m.g.

3a,b Mafic, massive or fol.

!X2a, b/J^Felsic-intermed.massive- fol., mg.

2b(d)y3 Intermediate, fol., banded, m.g.

l-2b(d)/* Felsi-intermediate,foliated, f.g. - m.g

2b A 2bf fi

-8-

lithologic compositions and relict textures make it possible to identify former e.g. quartzite or gabbro. Based on some key lithologies and relict textures metasedimentary protolith8 seem established for many of the gneiss succesions in Mcclintock Twp. Marmont (1990) summarizes 6 pertinent points addressing the question of protoliths.

Geology of the Claim Groups

The outcrop geology of the 3 claim groups was mapped between July 11 and September 21, 1991. 128 rock samples were collected and inspected with a steroemicroscope, 23 thin sections were prepared and studied petrographically. 14 samples were analyzed for base metals and in part for major oxides and precious metals. Petrographic and chemical results are listed in Appendices A and B.

Structure and Lithologic Succession

Although the 3 claim groups are separated by several km from each other they show a few common structural features. The general strike of the foliation is NE to ENE, the dip is gently and moderately dipping to the SE 910 - 50 degrees). In places, however, there are considerable local variations.

Compositional banding at 10 - 100 m is common and distinct and reflects possibly former sediments vs intrusives or various sedimentary rocks. Possible signs of strong deformation are common such as cm - dm scale banding, smeared-out mafic clots and recumbent folds.

In the following some structural features specific to each claim group are briefly described.

Bright Lake Claims. 1008780. 1040261

The trend of units is essentially north-south with a gentle eastern dip.This represents an aberration from the regional pattern. From the west,the structural base, the following succession eastward is noted:Intermediate gneiss,pink felsic gneiss,intermediate gneissmaifc gneiss )thin felsic unit ) intrusive ?ultramafic )mafic.

The ultramafic unit is thought to be a 50 - 70 m thick sheet structurally underlain and overlain by a 20 - 30 m thick mafic unit, in places with a thin (10 m) felsic unit between the two. The ultramafic and mafic package appears to pinch out to the south. This is interpreted, based on observed foliation attitudes, as the result of a warped, in its southern part north-dipping sheet being eroded. The observed pattern of the ultramafic mantled by mafic rocks is tentatively interpreted as a differentiated UM-mafic intrusive sill that has been deformed into a tightly folded,

-9-

overturned, east-dipping antiform.

The two small ultramafic outcrops, at the north end of claim 1008780, appear to be small lenses (boudins?) within other gneisses. The eastern one seems to be a 5 - 10 m thick, northeast trending lens sandwhiched between mafic granulite gneiss and felsic gneiss. The relationship of the western ultramafic occurrence to its surrounding rocks is unknown due to the lack of outcrops for approx. 100 m around it (island in a large marsh). It seems to be hosted as a boudined lens (?) by intermediate gneisses or felsic gneisses outcropping farther to the west.

Claim S.O. 1156309

Claim 1156309, a single claim approximately 1.5 km south of the 2 Bright Lake claims, shows a fairly flat lying, gently folded assemblage of felsic overlain by intermediate gneiss with minor mafic bands. The structure observed and interpreted also deviates from the regional pattern. A gently east plunging fold is outlined by the foliation and supported by a ring-shaped fold closure outlined by a thin mafic unit.

A prominent northeast trending topographic lineament marked by a deep, > 10 km long swampy depression cuts across the southeast corner of the claim. The resulting strong erosion along the edge of the lineament exposes the felsic gneiss underlying the intermediate gneiss along a series of 5 - 15 m high cliffs.

Claims 1040373. 1040374. 1040301. 1126088

This group of 4 claims is situated NW of the 10 Hardwood Lake claims and show a continuation of the consistent northeast trend of the semipelitic gneisses recognized by Chris Marmont in the adjacent claims f 1040303 and 1040304.

The structure in the 4 claims show a consistent northeast trend of foliation and of compositional banding. The dip is gentle (10 - 30 degrees) to the southeast. The succession of the lithologies from the northwest, the structural base, to the southeast, the structural top, is as follows:Pink, granitic gneiss represents the lowermost unit to the northwest followed by a 200 - 300 m wide (150 m thick) unit of mafic hornblende - pyroxene gneiss. A 50 - 200 m wide outcrop-free swamp is interpreted to be part of the mafic sequence.A mafic-ultramafic zone follows to the southeast. It consists of a relatively thin ( 30-100 m wide r 10-60 m thick) central ultramafic meta-pyroxenite mantled below and in part above by a feldspathic metapyroxenite. This package probably represents a former intrusive sill. The existence of a feldspathic pyroxenite structurally below and above the ultramafic is thought to indicate, as at Bright Lake, a possible, tightly - folded, antiformal, overturned, differentiated sill. The ultramafic - mafic package pinches out towards the southwest of the claim group indicating a possible boudin structure.

-10-

An iniermediaie biotite-garnet-hornblende gneiss structurally overlies the

mafic-ultramafic package. The boundary to the overlying felsic unit is

marked by a prominent topographic lineament which, however, does not

appear to be a shear zone.

The structurally uppermost unit to the southeast is a felsic, banded,

porphyroblastic garnet-biotite gneiss in part with minor graphite and

pyrite. This unit is interpreted as a metasediment and corresponds to the

meta-pelite and -semipelite described by Marmont (1990) in the claims

adjacent to the southeast.

Metamorphism

The metamorphic grade of all rocks encountered is very high, it is that of

the granulite facies. Characteristic features are the common presence of

metamorphic orthopyroxene and ubiquitous granoblastic textures. Relicts of

igneous textures are rare, only two examples were seen: Ophitic relict

texture in a metagabbro within a mafic gneiss unit, and large poikilitic

orthopyroxene enclosing small olivine grains within a meta-peridotite.

Lithology

GeneralA flexible alpha - numerical system of rock nomenclature is used since a

reliable determination of protoliths in granulite facies metamorphic

terrain is extremely difficult if not impossible. The system consists of

interchangeable digits for composition and texture. Figure 3 lists the

characters used for composition, texture and grain size. Figure 4 relates

this system to the rock nomenclature used by Marmont (190) in adjacent

claims.Lithologies are described according to their composition with reference to

textures and associations with each other. Caution is exercised in

assigning lithologies to protoliths.All lithologies underwent granulite facies metamorphism ad therefore have

almost without exception typical granoblastic, equigranular texture and a

weak but distinct mineral alignment of feldspar. Of the ferromagnesian

minerals pyroxene and hornblende are generally equant and granular in

shape whereas phyllosilicates are strongly oriented (foliation)

Ultramafic Rocks

The most common ultramafic rock type is olivine-pyroxenite and

metapyroxenite. Less common varieties are feldspathic metapyroxenite and

hornblende schist. Ultramafic rocks occur at two location: a) At Bright

Lake and b) in the 4-claim group.

a) Bright Lake

At Bright Lake ultramafic rocks form a 30 - 60 m thick, north - south

trending band or sheet and three smaller lenses which in part are closely

associated or mantled by mafic gneiss. The following varieties were

observed:

-11-

1) Olivine -MetapyroxeniteOlivine-metapyroxeniie consists of mostly orthopyroxene (strongly

pleochroic), minor clinopyroxene (10-40X),olivine (3-20X) and hornblende.

Accessories are spinel and opaque minerals. Spinel shows common symplectic

intergrowth with hornblende (samples PF-029, -031B, -039). A poikilitic orthopyroxenite approaching a peridotite (PF051) occurs at

the northern claim boundary of Claim 1008780. Large poikilitic orthopyroxene crystals (1-3 cm size) enclose 30-40X fresh and partly

serpentinized, equant olivine. This texture is considered as a relict of a

primary igneous, intrusive texture. Traces of opaque minerals observed

(sample 029) are predominantly pyrrhotite, as 0.1 - 0.3 mm blebs which enclose traces of chalcopyrite and 10 micron size pentlandite exsolution

flames.

2) Feldspathic PyroxeniteFeldspathic pyroxenite was recognized in l thin section (PF030B) and 0-50

m from an olivine-pyroxenite. The sample is a granoblastic, feldspathic

hornblende-bearing two-pyroxene pyroxenite (websterite). Plagioclase

abundance is 20 X. Equant orthopyroxene is surrounded by slightly smaller

clinopyroxene, interstitial hornblende and poikilitic plagioclaseenclosing small opaques. Plagioclase is mostly replaced by sericite. In

outcrop traces of pyrrhotite are seen.This occurrence of olivine-free, feldspathic pyroxenite indicates that the

ultramafic zone at Bright Lake includes several rock types which suggests

differentiation of the primary intrusive sill.

3) HornblenditeA small outcrop possibly representing a small lens hosted by intermediate

gneiss occurs in the southern part of Claim 1040261 (PF019). The rock

consists almost exclusively of small, randomly oriented, pale green hornblende grains with accessory biotite and sphene, the significance of

this rock type and its relationship with adjacent rocks is unknown.

Possibly it represents a retrograded pyroxenite.

b) 4-Claim Group (1040301, 1040373, 1040374, 1126088)

In this claim group metapyroxenite forms a 10 - 70 m thick sheet that also

is mantled on both sides by feldspathic pyroxenite. The mafic-ultramaic

unit trnds northeast, dips southeast and appears to pinch out towards the

southwest.In contrast to the previously described UM (Bright Lake) the metapyroxenite is olivine-free (PF093) and is made up of 80X non -

pleochroic orhtopyroxene and 20X pale green hornblende. Orthopyroxene

forms large oikocrysts that are surrounded by a granoblastic groundmass of

smaller orthopyroxene and hornblende.A feldspathic variety (PF103) consists of 80X ortho- and clinopyroxene

with 10-15X plagioclase and accessory hornblende and biotite. Traces of

opaques observed in polished section are 10-30 micron size pyrrhotite

blebs with rare traces of chalcopyrite and possible pentlandite and traces

of mackinawite.

-12-

Mafic Gneiss

Mafic gneiss is fairly widespread, in both the Bright Lake claims and in the 4-Claim Group but present only as rare, thin bands in Claim 1156309. Although ophitic relict texture was seen in only one outcrop it is thought that the protolith of most of the mafic gneisses is gabbro and feldspathic pyroxenite and that they represent the feldspar-bearing, differentiated portion of a ultramafic-mafic sill of which the olivine pyroxenite represents the basal differentiate. The equivalent to mafic gneiss in Marmont's mapping is probably 'opx-bearing gabbro* (unit 6a).

Two subtypes are included in this lithologic group: 1) Femag-rich, mafic gneiss (3/4 in legend) with 40 - 70X ferromagnesian minerals possibly corresponding to a mafic, high-MgO gabbro or feldspathic pyroxenite, and 2) Mafic gneiss (3 in legend), with 25 - 40 X Ferromegnesian minerals, corresponding to a gabbro.

The most extensive occurrence of mafic gneiss is in the 4-Claim Group where it forms a 300 - 450m wide zone northwest of, and structurally underlying, the ultramafic zone. In the Bright Lake claims mafic gneiss

occurs only as a 50 m wide zone (20 - 30 m thick) surrounding the ultramafic on both sides.

The mineralogy is dominated by plagioclase, hornblende, orthopyroxene and clinopyroxene. Accessories are biotite, garnet, opaque (up to 3-5X) and 1-2X apatite (samples PF057, -064). The relative abundance of ferromagnesian minerals varies but generally hornblende predominates over pyroxene (opx and cpx). The texture in thin section is fine to medium grained and granoblastic. In outcrop mafic streaks and ferromagnesian clots 5-10 mm in size are commonly observed suggesting a former blotchy meta-gabbro texture. Ophitic relict texture in outcrop was observed in one place (PF122). This occurrence is thought to represent a small ( metre size?) relict lens within granulitic mafic gneiss. Pyrite was observed only in trace amounts in a few samples.

Intermediate Gneiss

Gneiss of intermediate composition (units f 2 and 2/3 in legend) occur in all 3 claim groups. This rock type is thought to correspond to Marmont's

units la, l b and possibly 6b. The protolith of intermediate gneiss is unknown. It might represent a more felsic, i.e. dioritic portion of the

differentiated mafic-ultramafic intrusive sill or it might be a impure metasediment. In the Bright Lake Claims intermediate pyroxene-biotite -hornblende gneiss structurally underlies the mafic-ultramafic package to

the northwest. In the 4-Claim Group a relatively narrow (50 - 100 m) wedge

of intermediate pyroxene-hornblende-garnet gneiss occurs at the base of the thick mafic unit and a coarser grained hornblende-biotite-garnet - (pyroxene) gneiss overlies the ultramafic unit to the southeast. In claim 1156309 intermediate biotite-garnet-(pyroxene) gneiss covers most of the claim, structurally overlying the felsic gneiss.

-13-

The mineralogy is dominated by plagioclase with minor {5 - 15 X) quartz and minor ferromagnesian minerals (15 - 30 X) which are mostly biotite, hornblende and garnet with occasional pyroxene. Opaques are highly variable in abundance but locally up to 5X magnetite (PF044).

The texture is granoblastic, foliated, commonly slightly banded with streaks rich in biotite and/or hornblende.

Felsic-Intermediate Gneiss (with porphyroblastic garnet)

This rock type is most prevalent in the southeast corner of the 4-Claim Group, adjacent to the previously mapped 10 Hardwood Lake claims. It corresponds to Marraont's unit f l and 2, 'pelitic and semi-politic gneisses'. This rock type is considered as a meta-sediment based on well developed dm - m scale compositional banding and on the presence of graphite and pyrite. Beside feldspar and quartz the mineralogy is 5 20X ferromagnesian minerals make up the balance, namely biotite (5-15X) and garnet (3-10X), sample PF093. The garnet has a bright pink-mauve colour and is commonly porphyroblastic.

Felsic Gneiss

Felsic gneiss occurs at the structural base of the lithologic succession in all three claim groups mapped, underlying the intermediate and mafic - ultramafic packages. At Bright Lake felsic gneiss also occurs east of, i.e. overlying the mafic-ultramafic unit. This rock type is thought to correspond to Marmont's units f 3 and/or l b. The protolith of felsic gneiss is unknown. The two alternatives are either a felsic metasediment which is supported by minor graphite in one sample (PF066), or a felsic orthogneiss, i.e. a metamorphosed quartz - monzonite.

The rocks grouped under this heading are pink and grey in colour, foliated, locally distinctly banded and in places weather in a platy manner. Ferromagnesian minerals are locally concentrated in thin (1-5 mm), mafic streaks. The mineralogy is dominated by plagioclase, K-feldspar and quartz (up to 50X). Ferromagnesian minerals are biotite, hornblende, garnet and magnetite, possibly pyroxene, and make up from 2 to 15 X. Magnetite is a common accessory but not everywhere and locally makes up several X of the rock, l X graphite was observed in one sample (PF066) which supports the interpretation that the gneiss is a felsic metasediment. The texture is foliated , granoblastic, equigranular. Two schistosities were observed in one sample (PF023): si marks a thin mafic band, s2 re-orients individual ferromagnesian grains at 40 degrees to si.

Pegmatite

Granitic pegmatite was seen only in a few outcrops. Due to unexposed contacts to the host rocks it is not known whetther pegmatite forms cross-cutting veins or conformable lenses. A pegmatite band several meters

FIGURE 5

AFM Plot Of

H.C. Ellerinston

Samples (rocks)

Mcclintock Twp, Haliburton

County,Ontario

(Sar.iple Prefix

P f

)

K20

* i|a20

-15-

wide occurs (cuts?) within an ultramafic band in Claim 1040261. The

mineralogy is mainly k-fledspar and quartz with accessory biotite and

muscovite.

Economic Geology

No sulphide concentrations of economic interest were encountered. The only

sulphides observed are trace amounts of very fine grained pyrrhotite,

chalcopyrite and pentlandite in 2 polished sections of metapyroxenite.

Chemical analyses (see below) of a dozen type samples showed only

background levels of base metals and precious metals.

Lithe Geochemistry

14 rock samples were analyzed by ICAP for major oxides and base metals, 10

samples for precious metals. Results are listed in Appendix B. The major

oxide composition of type samples are plotted on a AFM diagram (Figure 5)

and illustrate the wide compositional scatter of the samples. Only a very

few samples plot in the ultramafic field, most intermediate and mafic granulites plot in the gabbroic-basaltic field.

Base metals, especially Ni and Cu, are at background levels, the highest

Ni-value is 524 ppm. Only Cr is slightly elevated with some values exceeding 1000 ppm. Au, Pt and Pd are in the low ppb range.

GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS

Aero - Magnetic SurveyThe airborne magnetic survey of 1989 covers most of the area in which the

7 claims occur but does not include the area that contains Claim f

1156309. No ground magnetic survey was conducted on the Ellerington Claims

in 1991.

The area of the two Bright Lake claim shows a birds-eye magnetic pattern

that outlines a number of northeast trending lows traversing Claim f

1008780 flanked to the east by several magnetic highs. The magnetic lows

approximately correspond to the intermediate and felsic gneisses (metasedimenis?) whereas the highs correspond roughly with the occurrence

of mafic and ultramafic rocks that in places contain disseminated pyrrhotite. The two Bright Lke Claims are situated south and east of a

large magnetic high situated approximately l km to the north and west.

The area of Claim f 1156309 is not covered by the airborne magnetic survey

but, based on magnetic highs north and south of the uncovered block,

appears to be situated east of a large magnetic high which is probably

associated with with the sulphide-bearing norite showing approximately l

km west-northwest.

-16-

The magnetic signature of the 4-Claim-block ( 1040373, 1040373, 1040301, 1126088) shows a east-northeast trending magnetic high in the south half of Claim 1126088 extending into the nothwest corner of Claim 1040374. This magnetic high corresponds well with the ultramafic unit mapped on surface. A steep, southward decrease of the magnetic field is evident in the 2 southern claims. The magnetic norhteast trend in Claim 1040374 coincides with the observed trend of the foliation of the rocks but the northwest magnetic trend in Claim 1040301 is at a high angle to the observed foliation trend of felsic gneisses in the southern half of Claim 1040301. A regional flexure at the scale of a km is thought responsible for this.

Several narrow, northeast trending magnetic anomalies occur in the Harwood-Crozier Lake area immediately to the south (Marmont 1990) and are correlated with gabbroic rocks and peridotite.

VLF - EM SURVEYS

All seven claims were surveyed on the ground by Mr. Ellerington using a Geonics EM 16 instrument and using the geological grid. Additional lines were established and surveyed by Mr. Ellerington in the east-half of Claim 1008780 to gain detailed information on an EM conductor identified y the Terraquest airborne survey. Claim 1156309 was surveyed both on north-south lines and on east-west lines.

The VLP-EM method uses VLP navigation signals as a primary source. The receiver measures the dip angle and vertical quadrature of the resultant magnetic field at the station. The method is capable of detecting weak conductors and has moderate to great depth penetration, but conductive overburden greatly diminishes its capability. Data are plotted as stacked profiles of dip angle and vertical quadrature. Conductor axes are identified where the dip angle crosses from positive to negative. There are few methods of quantitative interpretation of the data; conductors are merely identified.The survey used VLF transmitters NAA at Cutler, Me., U.S.A. (24.0 kHz) and NSS ( 21.4 kHz), at Annapolis, Md., U.S.A., depending whether north-south lines or east-west lines were surveyed.

The ground EM results are presented on Maps 4-6 which show the dip angle readings and the profile. Interpreted conductors are marked by a heavy line. The maps can be overlain onto the geological maps (Maps 1-3).

The results show only weak, discontinuous conductors none of which was picked up by the airborne survey. The north-south trending reverse quadrature conductor recognized by the air borne survey in Claim 1008780 at Bright Lake apppears to coincide with the out-of-phase cross-over of the ground VLF survey. The flight lines of the airborne survey are well oriented relative to the trend of the geology.

The Brights Lake claims (1008780, 1040261) were surveyed on east-west lines using the Annapolis transmitter. Additional lines in the eastern half of the claim, at nominal 50 m intervals, are designed to outline the conductor in detail.

-17-

The ground survey shows only a few weak, discontinuous conductors (Map 4):

a) The relative longest EM feature is a 200 - 300 m long, southeast trending, weak conductor extending from Line 5 to Line 7. As a very weak feature it appears to extend another 450 m to the southern claim boundary of Claim 1040261. This feature coincides in part with the contact between the felsic gneiss to the west and the intermediate-mafic gneiss to the east. This line might, however, also represent a fault feature since it is fairly straight and because, in its south and north portion, it cuts across the lithologic boundaries.

Several very short, discontinuous conductors occur in Claim 1008780:b) A 50-100 m long, NNE trending conductor, at Line l, at the eastern side of the island in the swamp. The nature of the anomaly is uncertain. It coincides with the eastern limit of the ultramafic peridotite outcrop and as such might reflect a lithologic boundary. It might, however, also be caused by the swamp.c) An isolated, short (less than 100 m) but good conductor exists on the southern claim line of Claim 1008780. The location of the conductor about 50 m west of the interpreted contact between gabbroic gneiss and sulphide bearing ultramafic is considered interesting.d) A series of probable in-phase cross-overs just east of the eastern claim line of 1008780 and north of f l post of 1008780 appears to outline a 200 m long north-south trending conductor. The interpreted cross-overs are just east of the end of the surveyed lines. This interpreted conductor occurs in an area marked by ultramafic rocks that outcrop west of a magnetic high in Brights Lake.

In Claim 1156309 no conductor is indicated by either the east-west nor the north-south survey. A false cross-over occurs on L 14. A near-cross-over on the east-west L 16 is attributed to the strong topography (5 - 10 m high cliffs). The geology of this claim is typified by almost horizontally lying, gently northeast and east-dipping, felsic and intermediate gneisses.The VLF EM survey in the 4 - Claim Group (1040373, 1040374, 1040301, 1126088) used the Annapolis transmitter which is not the optimal one for the northeast trending geology, the survey outlined two northeast trending conductors (Map 6) both associated with the mafic and ultramafic rocks and both associated with swampy terrain.The eastern one matches well with part of the northern contact of the ultramafic unit. The western one which is strong for approximately 200 m at the claim boundary between claim 1040374 and 1040301 seems to extend in a weaker form another 400m further to the northeast. It matches well with the interpreted northern contact of the mafic gneiss (unit 3/4). The conductor might, however, also be caused by the swampy overburden. A weak conductor appears to be indicated by near-cross-overs at the southeast corner of Claim 1040301. The survey lines are not completed to the claim boundary due to a 10 m high vertical cliff. The conductor is probably caused by the weakly graphitic, felsic metasedimentary gneiss (meta-pelite).No conductors occur at the northeast contact between the intermediate to afic gneiss and the underlying felsic gneiss ( northwest corner of claim

-18-

1040373).

DIAMOND DRILLING

Diamond driling was conducted in the southeast corner of Claim 1008780 during 1990 and 1991. One hole, I90-PRS-01, was drilled vertically to a

depth of 107 ft. The drill hole was collared in a gossanous, sulphide-bearing, ultramafic rock, a granoblastic olivine - hornblende - spinel bearing pyroxenite. Traces of pyrrhotite, chalcopyrite and pentlandite occur in samples approximately 100 m to the south (PF-29 and -30).The general geological setting outlined by surface mapping indicates a fairly steeply (60 degrees) east dipping ultramafic underlain by mafic gneiss, probably a metagabbro. The drill hole is thought to be collared approximately 50 m east of the contact between ultramafic and mafic gneiss and 50 m east of a short but good VLF EM conductor on Line 6.

Drill core of Hole 90-FRS-01 shows, from O to 50 ft, fine grained, granulitic norite interbanded with only minor peridotite, at a scale of less than a metre. This banded mafic - ultramafic assemblage is followed from 50 to 107 ft by a hornblende-diorite gneiss and hornblende-biotite gneiss of intermediate - mafic composition. It has a 2 - 5 mm blotchy texture and vague dm - m banding. The biotite-amphibole gneiss starting at 81 ft 6", is slightly less mafic than the rocks above, shows no banding but strong foliation. At 92 ft 6" 5X pyrite occur over 6 inches. This succession is interpreted as a high-grade metamorphic, mafic - ultramafic intrusive sill. No pyrrhotite nor chalcopyrite or Ni-sulphides were observed in the core, therefore none of the core was submitted for assay.

Drill logs and drill forms are contained in Appendix C.

The drilling was conducted in two stages: October 27 to November l, 1990

and from June 20 to June 25, 1991. The core was logged by Chris Marmont

(O - 67 ft) and Peter Fischer (67 - 107 ft).

SOIL GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY

9 soil samples were collected and analyzed. They were collected from the

northern claim line of Claim 1008780. Sample locations and the results of

geochemical analyses are contained in Appendix D.{f

The samples were collected from 8-27 irtchelT depth in a swamp, from theA-horizon and represent mostly organics and ooze. The analytical results

show mostly what is considered background values in base metals. Only 3samples show anomalous Cr values of more than 300 ppm. Corresponding Ni

values are less than 100 ppm.For samples consisting mostly of organics these Cr and Ni abundances areconsidered anomalous but since they were taken within 100 m from a known,

outcropping ultramafic occurrence these levels are not surprising. More

sampling in this area from a lower soil horizon might be interesting.

At this stage the small number of samples precludes a definite statement

as to the significance of the geochemical results.

-19-

CONCLUSIONS

Outcrop mapping of three small claim groups in the Central Gneiss Belt of

the Grenville Province of Ontario established a gently southeast and east

dipping sequence of granulite facies gneisses that range in composition

from felsic to ultramafic. Ultramafic and mafic rocks are the focus of

attention as potential hosts for Nickel- and Copper-sulphide

mineralization. These rock types were found in two of the claim groups and

are considered as high grade metamorphic, intrusive sills although

intrusive textures are only rarely preserved. Nickel- and copper sulphides

were encountered only in trace amounts in several outcrops of ultramafic

rocks in the two Bright Lake claims. Assays showed only background levels

in nickel and copper. Precious metal abundances are below the detection

limit. Diamond drilling of a gossanous ultramafic outcrop yielded no

sulphide mineralization. A small soil geochemical survey (9 samples)

produced 2 samples which are anomalous in Cr and possibly in Ni but this

is explained by the proximity to a known ultramafic outcrop.

-20-

Conclusions regarding OPAP objectives:

1. Explanation for airborne VLF EM conductors and potential

drill targets:

The north-south trending reverse quadrature conductor

recognized by the Terraquest airborne survey in Claim 1008780

appears to coincide with the out-of-phase cross-over of

the ground VLF survey but not with the in-phase cross

over. In other words: The airborne EM anomaly is not identical

with the ground conductor.

None of the airborne EM anomalies is in my opinion of interest

as a potential drill target.

2. Cause of magnetic anomalies shown in the airborne survey:

The positive airborne anomalies at the Bright Lake claims

are mainly east of the claims and appear to coincide with

the occurrence of an east-dipping, banded sequence of mafic

and ultramafic rocks.

At the 4-Claim-Group the positive magnetic anomaly which

widens to the northeast correlates well with a band of ultra

mafic and mafic rocks.

3. Mapping of Local geology to assess the favourability

for potential economic mineral deposits:

The local geology was mapped and described above. Based on

the assembled data there is, at present, no encouragement

to expect economic concentrations of Ni and Cu sulphide

mineralization.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Although the results were not encouraging more extensive

prospecting, sampling and assaying as well as soil geochemical

sampling should be done in the area of minor sulphide

occurrences in ultramafic rocks in the north part of

Claim 1040261 at Bright Lake.

-21-

LIST OP REFERENCES

Davidson, A., Culshaw, N.G., and Nadeau, L., 1982:A leclono-melamorphic framework for part of the Grenville Province,

Ontario; in Current Research, Part A, Geological Survey of Canada, Paper

82-1A, p. 175 - 190

Davidson, A. and Grant, S.M. 1986:Reconnaissance geology of western and central Algonquin Park and detailed study of coronitic olivine metagabbro, Central Gneiss Belt, Grenville Province of Ontario; in Current Research, Part B, Geological Survey of Canada, Paper 86-1B, p. 837-848.

Freeman, E.B., (ed.) 1979:Geological Highway map, southern Ontario. Ontario Geological Survey, Map

2441.

Marmont, C., 1990W.C. Ellerington "Hardwood Lake" Claim Group, Mcclintock Township,Haliburton County, Ontario. Report on diamond drilling and VLF-EM surveys

performed by W.C. Ellerington and geological mapping performed by C.

Marmont.

-22-

CERTIFICATE

I, Peter Pischer of 18 Cousins Drive, Aurora, Ontario, L4G, 1B3, herewith certify:

1. I am a consulting geologist and Fellow of the Geological Association of Canada.

2. I am a graduate of the University of Munich, Germany with a M.Sc. in geology, 1963, and of the same university with a Ph.D. in Mineral Exploration, 1967; and have been practicing my profession continuously since graduation.

3. The accompanying report is the result of my personal field work on the three claim groups between July and October, 1991.

4. I have no direct or indirect interest in the property, nor do T expect to receive any such interest.

Peter Fischer Consulting Geologist

Dated 21st October, 1991

APPENDIX A

DESCRIPTION OF SAMPLES

(Stereo-Microscope and Thin Section Descriptions)

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS USED

ace accessoryamph amphibolebiot biotitee.g. coarse grainedcpx clinopyroxenef.g. fine grainedfsp feldspargab gabbrohbl hornblendeK-fsp Potassium-feldsparmagn magneticm.g. medium grainedml magnetitenon-magn non-magneticop opaqueopx orthopyroxeneplag plagioclasepx pyroxeneqtz quartztr trace

APPENDIX A

Summary of Petrographic Descriptions of Hand Samples by Stereomicroscope and of Thin Sections using a Petrographic Microscope.

Sample Prefix 91-PF-

NOTB: All rocks have a granulitic, foliated texture which is not described with each sample.

91-PF-001 Pink granitic, felsic gneiss, fine grained.K-fsp, qtz, 3-5X Femags as thin stringers, ace. mi.

002 Intermediate to mafic gneiss, f.g., cm-banded. 25-30X hbl?, 1-2 X garnet. Magnetic.

003 Grey, felsic amph-biot gneiss, weakly magnetic.

004 Mafic gneiss, m.g., weak cm-banding. 25-30X hbl?, ace. mt. Magnetic

005 Pink, felsic, granitic gneiss, f.g., strongly foliated,sheared. 'Smeared-out l mm thick qtz streaks. 1-2X Femags ace. mt. Magnetic.

006 Grey and pink, banded, felsic garnet-biot. gneiss. 10X biot, 1-3X garnet. Weakly magnetic.

007 A Grey, felsic biotite-garnet gneiss, m.g.. 3-5X biot, 1-2X garnet. Weakly magnetic.

007 B Felsic biot-garnet gneiss, similar to 007A, slightly finer grained.

008 Pink felsic gneiss

009 Mafic gneiss, m.g., massive, strongly magnetic. 50-70X Femags ( hbl, px?)

010 Intermediate to mafic gneiss, m.g.. 30-40X Femags (hbl+px) Magnetic

011 Mafic gneiss. 30-35X Femags (hbl+px?), in part as 5-10 mm clots. Strongly magnetic.

012 Felsic gneiss, f.g., 20-25X qtz, 5X Femags (biot)

013 A Pink, felsic biotite gneiss, banded. 20X qtz, 3X biot., 3X mt.

013 B Intermediate-mafic band. 25-30* Femags, hbl, biot. non-magnetic.

APPENDIX A

014 A Felsic biotite gneiss, m.g., 0-30X qtz, 5X biot.

014 B Felsic garnet-mt-cpx? gneiss, m.g.. 15X garnet 3-5X mt, 3X cpx?. Strongly magnetic.

015 Felsic gneiss. 20X qtz, pink fsp, 1-3X biot. Strongly stretched fsp, qtz.

016 Pink, felsic garnet-mt-cpx gneiss, m.g.. 15X garnet, 3X mt, 3X light green cpx?. Strongly magnetic.

017 Grey and pink felsic biotite gneiss, fol, f.g. 15X biot fgarnet

018 Felsic amph gneiss, mg, strongly foliated. K-fsp, 20X qtz, 3X hbl.. Magnetic.

019 THIN SECTION Description:Ultramafic amphibole schist, fine grained.Closely packed, randomly oriented, pale green, stubbyamphibole grains. Trace sphene, biotite, IX disseminatedopaques.

020 Light grey, felsic gneiss. 20X qtz, 1-2X biot, 1-2X ml.

021 Intermediate biotite gneiss, coarse, pegmatitic. 20-25X biot non-magnetic.

022 Mafic hbl-px? gneiss. 30-40X Fernags. Non-magnetic.

023 THIN SECTION DescriptionFelsic hbl-garnet gneiss. 40-50X qtz, 40-50* plag, 5X hbl, 1-2X garnet, IX opaque, trace zircon. Two fabric directions: si (?) outlined by hbl and garnet stringers. Individual Femag grains are re-oriented by s2. Qtz and plag grains and Femag grains are oriented at 45 degrees rel to Femag bands.

024 Intermediate-mafic gneiss, weak fol. 30-35X hbl and px Non-magnetic.

025 Intermediate-felsic(?) gneiss. 5 X Femags, (hbl?).

026 A Mafic hbl-gneiss, massive. 40X hbl. Non-magnetic.

026 B Intermediate, feldspathic biotite-(garnet) gneiss.

027 Intermediate-mafic gneiss, weakly fol. 25X px?, 5-10X biot.. non-magnetic.

028 Intermediate-mafic gneiss, dm-banded, strongly fol. 30X Femags, hbl, biot, garnet.

APPENDIX A

029 THIN SECTION DescriptionUltramafic. Olivine, hornblende and spinell-bearing two-pyroxene pyroxenite (Oliv.-hbl-websterite?) A granular mosaic of mostly orthopyroxene (strongly pleochr.) 1-2 mm, with minor clinopyroxene, scattered

olivine (to 5 mm) and 10X interstitial hbL Hbl forms commonly a symplectic intergrowth with spinel (1-2X). Opaque

(1-2X) are diss. Olivine are both fresh and serpentinized. Opaques identified in polished section are mostly pyrhotite

with traces of chalcopyrite and 10 micron size pentlandite

exsolution flames

030 B THIN SECTION DescriptionFeldspathic, hornblende-bearing, granoblastic websterite. 50 X opx, 20X cpx, 10X hbl, 20X plag, IX opaque. Texture massive, granoblastic, 1-2 mm grain size. Equant opx are

surrounded by slightly smaller cpx, interstitial hbl and poikilitic plag enclosing small blebs of opx. Scattered opaque grains. Plag 80 X repi, by seric. Trace po.

031 B THIN SECTION DescriptionUltramafic, olivine-, hbl-, spinel-bearing granoblastic websterite. Similar to 030 B but with olivine and free of feldspar. 40-50X opx, 30-40* cpx, IOX hbl, 2-4X oliv, IX op,

2-3 X spinel. Oliv is fresh. Trace po(stereomicrosc.).

032 Grey mafic gneiss, m.g.-c.g. (2-5 mm), fol, blotchy texture

30-35X Femags (hbl, px?, minor biotite).

033 Grey intermediate to mafic gneiss, m.g., strongly fol,knotty weathering. 25-30X Femags (hbl, px?), non-magnetic.

034 Mafic gneiss, weakly fol, non-magnetic. 40-50X Femags.

035 Pink felsic gneiss, weakly fol, magnetic. K-fsp, 10-20X qtz,

2-3X Femags (ml, biot).

036 Intermed.-felsic gneiss, fol, slightly knotty, rusty. 5X Femags (biot).

037 THIN SECTION DescriptionIntermediate px-biot-hbl gneiss. Plag, 15X opx+minor cpx,

5-1 OX biot, 3X qtz, IX op. Texture fol, banded, granular. Biot concentrated in bands.

038 Feldspathic, mafic gneiss. 5X garnet.

039 THIN SECTION DescriptionUltramafic granoblastic olivine-hbl-spinel-bearing pyroxenite. IOX oliv. (fresh). Very similar to 031 B. Px

are almost exclusively opx.

040 Intermediate-felsic gneiss, banded. Feldspar, 10-20X qtz in

bands. 15X garnet, concentrated in bands.

APPENDIX A

041 Intermediate gneiss, slightly rusty. < 5 X Pemags.

042 Mafic, inclusion-bearing hbl-garnet gneiss, fol, banded.

30-OX Femags (hbl, px?). Magnetic.

043 Feldspathic, granoblastic pyroxenite, massive. 85-90X px,

10-15X f sp. Mon magnetic.

044 Intermediate gneiss, foL 10X biot, 10X qtz, 5X mt.

Strongly magnetic.

045 Mafic gneiss, fol. 30X Femags (px?)

046 A Light grey, felsic, granitic gneiss, weak fol. 10X qtz,

5-10X garnet. In outcrop underlies 046 B.

046 B Intermediate gneiss, fol. 25X Femags (hbl?), 2X garnet,

non-magnetic.

047 Mafic gneiss, massive. 30X opx?, blotchy 2-5 mm texture.

048 Intermediate-mafic biot-amph gneiss, m.g., foL

049 THIN SECTION DescriptionMafic gneiss, weak fol. Flag. 40X Femags (opx * cpx, hbl,

11X biot, 3-5X opaque.). Texture granoblastic, equigranular.

Grain size 0.2 - 0,5 mm.

050 A Feldspathic pyroxenite?, e.g. 70-80 opx, 20-30X plag.

050 B Mafic gneiss, fol, 30-40X px, hbl.

050 C UM? Feldspathic pyroxenite ?, f.g., massive, tr. py

051 THIN SECTION Description UM peridotite, m.g. - e.g.30-40X, 0.5-1 mm, fresh and partly aerpentinized olivine

Opx occurs as large poikilitic grains, 5- )10 mm, enclosing

oliv, and as small, granular grains between oliv. In part

coronitic textures around oliv.. Trace of brown-green spinel

and opaque (mt?) assocd with serpentine.

052 Intermediate biot-garnet gneiss. Strong fol, mm-cm banding,

5-10X quartz. Non-magnetic.

053 Intermediate biot-garnet gneiss, fol, 10-15X Femags, 10X qtz

Non-magnetic.

054 Intermediate hbl-biot-garnet gneiss, weak fol. 20X Femags.

Magnetic.

055 Mafic px-garnet gneiss, fol. 40-50X Fernags. Non-magnetic.

APPENDIX A

056 Intermediate px-biot-garnet gneiss, strongly foL, 25-30X Fernags. Non-magn.

057 THIN SECTION DescriptionMafic hbl-opx-biot-cpx-op gneiss, m.g., fol. Total Femags 40-50X, dominated by hbl (25X), opx (15X), with a few X each of biot, cpx, op.. Texture weakly foliated, granoblastic, 0.3-1.5 mm. Slightly oriented Femags in mosaic plag matrix. Non-magn.

058 Felsic biot-garnet gneiss, strongly fol. Light grey fsp, 10-15X Femags, 15X qtz. Non-magn.

059 Intermediate biotite-garnet gneiss, strongly fol, banded. 30X Femags. Non-magn.

060 Felsic biot-gneiss, slightly banded, strongly fol, platy. 10-15X qtz, 5X biot. Non-magn.

061 Mafic hbl-biot-garnet gneiss, fol. 30-35X Femags. Non-magn.

062 A Intermediate-mafic gneiss, fol. 25X Femags. (hbl?, biot), Non-magn.

062 B Diabase Dyke, f.g., massive. Igneous, unmetamorphosed texture, lathy plag, ophitic Femags ^OX. Magnetic.

063 Mafic gneiss. 30-40X Femags (hbl, biot), fol. Non-magn.

064 THIN SECTION DescriptionMafic hbl-px-biot. gneiss. Total Femags 50-60X, plag. Hbl 30X, opx * cpx 15-20X, biot 5-10X, op 1-2X, ace. apatite, trace qtz. Texture homogeneous, granoblastic, weak mineral orientation. Grain size 0.3 - l mm. Non-magn.

065 Intermediate-mafic biot-hbl?-garnet gneiss. 30-40 X Femags. Magnetic.

066 Felsic-intermediate biot-garnet gneiss. Total Femags l OX, IX graphite. Non-magn.

067 Felsic-intermediate biot- garnet-gneiss. Total Femags 10-15X, quartz 10-15*.

068 THIN SECTION DescriptionFelsic biot-garnet gneiss. Plag, 25X qtz, 3-5X biot, 3-5X garnet, ace. apatite. Texture 0.2-2 mm grain size, strongly oriented qtz, biot, slightly oriented plag mosaic and large garnet.

APPENDIX A

069 Intermediate biot-gneiss. 5X biot, 10X garnet. Non-magn.

070 Mafic hbl-garnet{-biot?) gneiss.Total Femags 40-50*. Magn. Banded in outcrop

071 Mafic px(?) gneiss, massive. Total Pemags 30-40 X. Magn.

072 Intermediate-mafic px(?) gneiss. Flag, 25-30* opx(?), brownish. Magn.

073 Mafic px(?)-garnet gneiss. Total Fernags 30-40 ^.Magnetic. In outcrop some larger Femag-clots.

074 Intermediat-mafic px(?)-hbl-gneiss. Total Femags 25-30X. non-magnetic.

075 Intermediate-mafic px(?)-hbl-garnet gneiss. Total Femags 30-40X. Magnetic. In outcrop diffuse, sub-parallel mafic streaks.

076 Intermediate-mafic px-hb]-garnet gneiss. Total Femags20-25*. 5-7X garnet. Magnetic. In outcrop mafic streaks.

077 Intermediate-mafic px-hbl gneiss. 30X Femags. Magnetic.

078 THIN SECTION DescriptionFelsic gneiss. K-fsp, 25-30* qtz, 1-2X op, 0.5X garnet, trace hbl, biot. Texture m.g., 0.2-3 mm grain size, strong mineral orientation. Magnetic.

079 Intermediate-mafic px(?)-hbl gneiss. 25-30X Femags. Non-mag. In outcrop blotchy relict texture, stretched 0.4 - 2 cm hbl-blotches (relict gab texture ?)

080 THIN SECTION DescriptionMafic hbl-px gneiss. Hbl 25X, cox -f opx 15-20X, biot. 2X, trace opaque, apatite. Texture m.g., granoblastic, plag mosaic with oriented hbl, px grains.

081 Intermediate-mafic hbl(?)-garnet gneiss. 25X Femags, in part as cm size blotches. Magnetic.

082 Intermediate-mafic gneiss, 30X Femags. Magnetic. In outcrop 30X mafic streaks, 0.5 - l cm thick.

083 Intermediate-mafic hbl-px(?) gneiss. 30-40X Femags. Magnetic, l cm thick Femag streaks.

084 Mafic px-hbl-(garnet) gneiss. 40X Femags. Magnetic. Blotchy texture.

085 Mafic hbl-px gneiss. 40-50* Femags. Weakly foliated, almost

APPENDIX A

massive.

086 Felsic biot-(garnet) gneiss. 5X biot, 2X garnet, SX quartz. Non-magnetic.

087 Intermediate-mafic hbl-px-(garnet) gneiss. 30X Pemags. In outcrop banded, platy, homogeneous, no mafic clots.

088 THIN SECTION DescripitonMafic hbl-px gneiss. 20X hbl, 20X cpx * opx, trace opaque. Texture: 0.5 - 2 mm grain size, plag mosaic, slightly oriented anhedral hbl and px. Non-magnetic. In outcrop stretched mafic blotches.

089 Intermediate px-hbl-(garnet) gneiss. 20-25X Pemags, including 5X garnet. Magnetic.

090 Intermediate px-biot-garnet gneiss. 20-25X Pemags. Non magnetic. In outcrop homogeneous, not banded.

091 Intermediate-felsic biot-garnet gneiss. 5-7X Femags. Non-mag. In outcrop homogeneous, no banding.

092 Felsic biot-garnet gneiss. 2-4X Femags. Non-magnetic.

093 THIN SECTION DescriptionIntermediate-felsic biot-garnet gneiss, graphitic. Plag. 15X qtz 15X biot, 5-7X garnet, 2-3X graphite. Texture fol, 0.5 - 2 mm grain size, granoblastic, compositionally banded. Mosaic of plag, minor qtz, oriented biot, graphite. Qtz concentrated in mm-cm bands. Garnet large, porphyroblastic. Non-magnetic.

094 Felsic-intermediate biot-garnet gneiss. 5-10X biot, 10-12X garnet. Non-magnetic.

095 THIN SECTON DescriptionUltramafic orthopyroxenite with minor hbl.80X opx, 20X pale-green hbl. Texture massive, granoblastic. A few large opx-poikiloblasts in a groundmass of granular , randomly oriented opx and minor hbl. Scattered accessory opaque grains. Opx is not pleochroic. Non-magnetic.

096 Ultramafic, pyroxenite, similar to 095. Non-magnetic.

097 Ultramafic, pyroxenite, as 095. Non-magnetic.

098 Intermediate biot-garnet gneiss. 25X Femags. No magnetic.

099 Intermediate-felsic biot-garnet gneiss. 10-15X Femags. l - 2 X graphite.

APPENDIX A

100 Intermediate blot-garnet gneiss. 15-20 X Femags. Non-magn.

101 Mafic or ultramafic px(?)-gneiss. 50-60X ? Femags (px). Massive. In outcrop rusty, crumbly, possibly trace sulphide ?

102 THIN SECTION DescriptionFeldspathic pyroxenite, massive. 80X cpx -l- opx, 10-15X plag 5X hbl, 2X biot, l X opaque. Texture granoblastic, massive 0.3 - l mm grain size. Mosaic of randomly oriented stubby and equant px, hbl, plag. Disseminated Op.

103 Ultramafic^?) pyroxenite, m.g., massive, similar to 103.

104 Mafic to ultramafic gneiss. 50-70X px?. 30-50 X plag. Non-magnetic.

105 THIN SECTION DescriptionFeldspathic orthopyroxenite or mafic opx-biotite gneiss. 50-60X opx, 30X plag, 10X biot, trace opaque. Texture weakly fol, 0.3 - 1.5 mm grain size. Granoblastic mosaic of equant plag, slightly oriented anhedral and boxy opx (non-pleochroic). Scattered, strongly aligned biot flakes. Texture slightly blotchy due to some 3-5 mm opx clusters. Non-magnetic.

106 Intermediate biotite-garnet gneiss. 10-15X Femags.

107 Intermediate biot-garnet gneiss. 15X Femags. Non-magnetic.

108 Mafic to ultramafic pyroxenite. 60-80 X px. Non-magnetic. In outcrop large, 5-10 mm opx porphyroblast, brownish.

109 Ultramafic pyroxenite, massive, m.g. 80-90X px, 10-20X plag. Non-magnetic.

110 Mafic px-gneiss. 50X px, 50X plag. Massive, granular, m.g., Non-magnetic.

111 Intermediate garnet-(biot) gneiss. 20X Fernags, mostly garnet, cm-banded.

112 Intermediate garnet-biot gneiss. 20-25X Femags (mostly garnet), 5X quartz. Non-magnetic. Garnet is porphyrobl.

113 Intermediate biot-hbl gneiss. 15-20 Femags, 5 X quartz. Hornblende as 3 - 5 mm thick streaks.

114 Mafic hbl-px gneiss. 40-50X Femags. Homogeneous, foL Magnetic

APPENDIX A

115 Mafic to ultramafic px-hbl? gneiss. 50-70* Femags, mostly px. Massive, m.g., Non-magnetic.

116 Intermediate hbl-garnet-px(?) gneiss, minor biot. Total Fernags 15*. Non-magnetic.

117 Intermediate-mafic biot-garnet-hbVpx(?) gneiss. 25-30* Femags. Banded in outcrop.

118 Intermediate hbl-px(?)-garnet gneiss. 10-15* Femags. No biot. Massive, weakly magnetic.

119 Mafic hbl-px gneiss. 40-50* Femags. F.g massive. Non-magn.

120 Mafic px-hbl gneiss. 50-60* cpx 7-1- opx ?* hbL Massive, f.g. i porphyroblastic, non-magnetic.

121 Mafic gneiss. 30-35X px-fhbl?

122 Metagabbro, m.g., massive, with preserved ophitic texture. In Outcrop: Probably not a dyke but a preserved part of a mafic intrusive sill, although no contact relationships with granulitic rocks are exposed.

123 Intermediate biot-garnet-px(?) gneiss. 15-20* Femags. In outcrop streaks and clusters. Non-magn.

124 THIN SECTION DescriptionIntermediate biot-hbl-garnet gneiss. Flag. 5-10* qtz, 15-20* biot, 5* hbl, 3-5* garnet. Texture m.g., 0.3 - 1.5 mm grain size. Granoblastic plag mosaic with small qtz blebs. Femag minerals are strongly aligned, si, and in part poikiloblastic. Non-magnetic.

125 Intermediate biot-garnet-px (?) gneiss. 15-20* Femags.Non-magnetic. In outcrop porphyroblastic: One ) l cm size feldspar porphyroblast.

126 Intermediate garnet-hbl-px gneiss. 15-20* Femags. Non-magn.

127 A Felsic biot-garnet-hbl gneiss. 5-10* Femags, 20* qtz. In outcrop banded, (bedded), distinct compositional banding. Non-magnetic.

127 B Intermediate hbl-px-garnet gneiss. 15-20* Femags. No-magn.

128 Mafic hbl-px(?) gneiss. 40* Femags. Magnetic. In outcrop slightly blotchy texture, weak foliation.

APPENDIX B

CHEMICAL ANALYSES

BA

RR

ING

ER

LA

BO

RA

TOR

IES

Dr.Peter F

isch

erFISCHE

R GE

OLOGIC

AL C

ONSU

LTIN

G ASSOCI

ATES

LT

D18 C

ousins D

rive

Auro

ra,O

ntar

ioL4

G 1B3

573b

iM

ISS

ISS

AU

QA

, ON

TAR

IO

CA

NA

DA

L

4Z1N

9 P

HO

NE

: (4

18)

8904

586

FAX:

(4

16)

8904

575

2-O

ct-9

1

Page

: l

Cop

y:

l of

2

Attn:

P.Fischer

Project:

Job;

9113

25

PO f

:Re

ceiv

ed:

26-Sep-91

11:10

Status;

Final

A1203

ICAP

Saaple

X

11 29 40 45 50 51 62 71 79 104

108

111

112

119

18,4 5.12

16,6

15,0 9.33

5.53

14.7

17.0

17.4 4.59

6.95

20,2

20,0 5.86

Fe20

3 ICAP

X 15.7

13.5

11.8

13.5

10.1

12.6

11.4

13.8 8,15

7.41

7.98

8.89

9.88

7.69

MtfO

ICAP

X 6.07

19,9 4.96

9.38

10.7

25.8 7.49

6.12

6.86

16.9

17.0 2.70

3,56

16.1

CaO

ICAP

X 9.

2910.5 7,89

9.14

9.86

3.90

7.85

9.93

10.0

17.4

16.5 7,60

4.90

17.0

Na20

IC

AP

X 1.91

0.46

3.19

1.54

1.23

0.63

2.63

2.14

2.44

0.42

0.50

4.07

2.98

0.54

K20

ICAP

X 0.

150.

030.

470.

230.

820.11

1.07

0.21

0.40

0.05

0.12

0.93

2.23

0.20

Ti02

IC

AP X 1.27

80.312

1.29

80.741

0.57

40.235

1.47

31.

254

0.72

70.317

0.29

91.

298

1.35

40.

429

MnO

Ag

Be

Cd

Co

Cr

Cu

No

Ni

ICAP

IC

AP

ICAP

IC

AP

ICAP

IC

AP

ICAP

IC

AP

ICAP

X

DDB

DDB

DDB

DDB

DDB

DDB

DDB

DDB

0.15

0.23

0.18

0.22

0.21

0.19

0.18

0.18

0.14

0.16

0.16

0.15

0.19

0.17

U

2.0

a

0.7

^

2.0

a

1.5

(1

1.8

1 0.4

a

1.5

O

2.6

a

1.1

a

i.o

a

i.o

U

2.0

a

2.3

O

1.2

U

47a

95a

26a

47U

52a

121

U

23O

30a

27a

32a

57a

^a

^a

se

85 589 81 159

388

1710 273 48 209

1500

1230 119

152

1340

85

^11

2 ^

16

^89

O

69

0114

^15

011

019

031

0

44

rt9

rt13

rt

13

O

20

4820

215

20

2420

3620

107

20

524

20

5320

11

20

3120

11

20

33!0

11

20

1620

^

Pb

Sr

Th

V Zn

Zr

Au

Pt

PdICAP

ICAP

ICAP

ICAP

ICAP

IC

AP F

A/AA

AA

AA

PDB

DPB

DDB

DDIB

DDB

DDB

ODD

ODD

ODD

11 29

40

16

400

17

122

24

340

536

171

326

124 73 117

29

1229

13

58

9

SERVICES FOR THE EARTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES

BA

RR

ING

ER

LA

BO

RA

TOR

IES

Dr.Peter F

ischer

FISC

HER

GEOLOGICAL C

ONSULTING

ASSOCI

ATES

LTD

18 C

ousins D

rive

Aurora,Ontario

L4G

IBS

57:

AD

A!

to

l M

ISS

ISS

AU

GA

, O

NTA

RIO

C

AN

AD

A

L4Z

1N9

PH

ON

E:

(416

) 89

0456

6 FA

X:

(416

) 89

0457

5

2-Oct-91

Page:

Copy

:l

of2 2

Attn:

P.Fische

r Project:

Job:

911325

PO l

:Received:

26-Sep-91

11:10

Status:

Fina

l

Pb

Sr

Th

V Zn

Zr

Au

Pt

PdICAP

ICAP

ICAP

ICAP

ICAP

IC

AP FA/AA

AA

AASample j

?pm

PPB

PPB

ppm

ppm

ppm

ppb

ppb

ppb

45 50 51 62 71 79 104

108

111

112

119

22

117

Abbreviations;

Parameters;

A1203

Fe203

MgO

CaO

Na20

K20

16 25 22 29 26 30 21 17 27 44

350

150 83 340

509

566 93 146

686

363

^ 0 ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ <5 <5 <5

279

213 92 192

658

197

266

236

152

166

128

120

120

127

110 79 61 67 105

162

32 65 29 34 28 30 23 22 35 131

10 7 7 10 NR NR 13 9 NR NR

as as as as NR NR as as NR NR

ao ao ao ao NR NR ao ao NR NR

314

7135

10

as

ao

Alumina

Ferric O

xide

Magnesium

Oxide

Calcium

Oxide

Sodium M

onoxide

Potassium

Monoxide


BARRINGER LABORATORIES

Dr.Peter Fischer

FISCHER

GEOLOG

ICAL

CONSULTING

ASSOCIATES LT

D18 C

ousins D

rive

Aurora

fOntario

L4G

1B3

MIS

SIS

SA

UQ

A,

ON

TAR

IO

CA

NA

DA

L

4Z1N

9 P

HO

NE

: (4

16)

890-

8566

FA

X:

(416

) 89

0-85

75

Attn:

P.Fischer

Proj

ect:

Page:

Copy:

2-Oct-91

3 l of

2

Received:

26-S

ep-9

1 11:10

PO

Status!

Fina

l

Ti02

MnO

Ag Be Cd Co Gr Cu Mo Ni Pb Sr Th V Zn Zr Au Pt Pd

Meth

ods;

I CAP

FA/A

AAA

Titanium d

ioxide

Manganese

Oxid

eSilver

Beryllium

Cadniun

Cobalt

Chron

i un

Copper

Molybdenun

Nickel

Lead

Strontium

Thorium

Vanadium

Zinc

Zirconium

Gold

Platinum

Palladium

Indu

ctiv

ely

coup

led

argon

plasma

Fire A

ssay/Atomic

Absorption

Atomic A

bsorption

percent


BA

RR

ING

ER

LA

BO

RA

TOR

IES

Dr.Peter F

ischer

FISC

HER

GEOLOGICAL C

ONSU

LTIN

G ASSO

CIAT

ES LTD

18 C

ousins D

rive

Aurora,Ontario

L4G

1B3

Attn:

P.Fischer

Project:

Job:

911325

PO *

:Received:

26-Sep-91

11:10

B?—.

..IBAD

A... ..

MI

SSISS

AUOA

, ONT

ARIO

CANA

DA L

4Z1N

9PHONE: (

416) 8904566

FAX:

(416) 8904575

Page:

Copy:

2-Oct-91

4l of

2

Stat

us;

Fina

l

ppi

ppb

Quality

codes:

NR

: parts

per

illlion

: parts

per

billion

: Less than q

uoted

dete

ctio

n Unit

: An

alys

is n

ot requested

Job

approved b

y:

Signed:

Margar

et

If, Dmcziger

Supe

rvis

or,

deochenistry/Fire

Assa

y Services


APPENDIX C

DIAMOND DRILLING RECORD

*— l*w —— — —— — ^ A

V\ jK l C *1 t \ f} i \ ' ti O i k 1 1 *l * L l '

V ,. f v.,*f c

"S f y-

—— 2-, —————

•J j[(\ ? ^*^k J* Am n *

5" L* i

^ (Nr. '^ ** ^* P i*

VI ^^

' * "w™ "JJ^ ST

*- p — i -Ss Li 5;1 - f. 4 1 1*

l ^ l* J,w * * ft jr s* -**o* x f S- *?o

^ J 0 ^* S^ i

"Hi

u•p**ooH

B f

, ———————— 9oK.- ———————— •>f<! ————— 95 v. ——————— ———

ss&sssfifraie— H ——————— 1 ——————— 1—

.

'OcRSPI^n Q^O VcM''--'

^

(JO^ *K ft a ™

f* ^Vb |^F

i*

* l 1 /' \. * * " t. 5 n 0•r *

1

2.

|

t!*l|l if-

,

-ffc^

tr l

; s

M1, ?T1 3 H y. \

^ rT * St S i?5 ^ t f 9-

iiM * 1

^

V

H3 ^ pf '^1•* ^ *i-

^V

rj"

aio-

* j ** 'Q I^K J. C^

g^ xs f 1^

W pur

' cfc

•T-

j• j ^i^'

?*

^4 ^ 7

^5 *- I-"

~ Recovery

Lithology and

, Structure

Alteration

fl;ijl l l 4 4 J 1 1

jj-ijj-

i

fT b.0 f*

00 1t n n t—

Vtt rtX l-

en A

VI

G0HCmn

5 > z c- P1 Hso v PI> 3 50r- o. > l-l l-i

2 a H Z t-t O

•-i

S O

gK

CO

•ow

^^*-

•5*1

V*1

t

i4l'f

-

o fo

f^ 9V N

•^5"

Q o;rip Q 4 —

FM-Col t

IOo

J1**

Recovery

Lithologyand

Structure

Alteration

Qn o ii A A l—

01M rr X M- i- <

rl4:t

.0 f* ir "

"* *

C/l

go50PI

z r- ni H pa m m

ol

RATION nd ALIZATION

lo* Ik

ri;si0 (ko

*

J*

ft'goSoK

—s

l ] J ] n y*

CA

•O

5

•J

rri

m

m

57 -

s *.f -r 4* v^ -r *"Recovery

Lithologyand

Structure

t/* •o

J___J

f

J J J JJ J-3

l t

f..',

J l:,

l

l"..:)

i l

l l

m m

fi 5)

^

tt)

O

X

M

l-

-H

b

o

3

w

V

~4 T

3 4J

Q

>

O

C

O

h

O

.C

(O

3

01

O

U

b

U

W

**

U

f^

OS

*J

(O

4

54 ;T 5^ 4* -

fei

,

tt. *v tJ-

JC.

rela

tive

to

cor

e ax

isSTRUCTURE

ALTERATION

and

MINERALIZATION

;

w V

-7F

LITH

OLOG

Y

92,

*fi*

l

SAM

PLE

7". J.

^

w!S

M

h

HO

3

01

i-i

T3

iJ>

o e

uo

js w

ay

u w

V

w4

UB!

J

CO

e o

V.

67

X.

rela

tive

to

cor

e ax

isST

RUCT

URE

ALTERATIONf

and

MINERALIZATION

LITH

OLOG

YSA

MPL

E

T

i

l t

l l

l l

l l

i i

4. f-f"

1 l

rela

tive

to c

ore

axis

3*

STRU

CTUR

EALTERATION

and

MINERALIZATION

LITHOLOGY

f*-

SAMP

LE

*M •"fi**, 6 •L.^.C/I*

l^-p

.

.

^

r r e

x w

oX

60

U

M

U

O

S

W

O

—

T3

U

M

> O

C

O

Vio

.c t

o s

vU

U

W

4J

os J

w

<

*

i^V

r

*k cr

P

B

M

i a * * *

r r

r i

1 L

l J)

fcH

*}

0 T

KD

-0 \

JS-

rela

tiv

to c

ore

axi

•h,*

1 M

V

*

W

*

B l6

STRU

CTUR

E s

B * *

V

ALTE

RATI

ON

and

MIN

ERAL

IZAT

ION

m

1 '

' '-

*U*

\*t ,

'

-LI

THOL

OGY

* -

SAM

PLE

f J^^(

1^ /k

^W

&M

i^k

/^x^

?9^9

***

^^^

^^^^

^t t

A

DIAMOND DRTLI. HOLE SECTION

Diamond Drill Hoia 90 PRS 0 1

DDH 90 PRS-Ol -90*

lb

Depth (feet)

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

107

lb

la

lb

lb

la, lb

lb

la

u

5a

5a

5b

5a

5b

loat cor*

•hear

badly broken cor*

P P

P

4

Sasilicified

la lb2345a 5b P

Norite, coarse grained Norite, fine grained Peridotite Granite gneiss Biotite granite gneiss Hornblende diorite gneiss hornblende-biotite diorite gneiss granitic pegmatite

Scale: 1: 120 or l inch - 10 foot

Hole located in Claim number S. O. 1008780

72 metres west and 36 metres north of the number 2 post of claim S. O. 1008780

EoH

ofM

inistere duDiam

ond Journal de

Com

plete this form and

i .fyi

Nounem utm

m^M

UH

i U

UVU

.U^M

D.II uu iw

iu D

r|||ina

fora

ge 8U

related sketch In duplicate.

Fill in on every page Hole No.

"" pigjN

o.

OM

rto 8nd M

ln88 -""M

lnii

"Miin

g

^

^ Rem

pUr en deux exemplalre, ,.

Remplir ces cases a

fV

Fo"" "'

Pa*""

s

presents formule et le croquls annexe

chaque page r

)A -

,

Drilling Company

Collar Elevation Com

pagnle de lorage Elevation du collier

i

Date Hole Started S

Date Com

pleted Date Logged

Date de comm

encement du lorage'

Dale d'achevement

Dale description au journal

n, f~

.27 7

-A S

? *

u

J~

,e ,~

-T

& S

?y S

. TLy 2

i?/?

/Exptoraiion Co., Owner or Optionee

Date/fiubmitte'd Com

pagnie d'explor allen, proprletalre ou tltulaire d'optlon Date de depot

Footage/Avancement

From/De

'

To/ARock Type

Type de roche

Bearing ol hole from tru* Total Footage Dip ol Hole at

* North/Position du torage Avancem

ent total du Inclination du lorage au

par rapport au nord vrai lorage

*0

/O 7

' Collar/collier

y O

Logged by "

Inscrit par FI./PI

'?0

/"^S

t-t- /^vvt /r f

f /ft /J

'

Submitted by (Signature) .,.p,

t*^ *

' " *^ ny

Fl./PI

Description (Colour, grain size, texture, minerals, alteration, etc.)

Description (Couleur, granulometric, texture, m

ineraux, transformation, etc.)

Address/Location where core stored Adresse/endroit ou la carotte est stockee

PUn* f Mlwn

CV

MM

WM

M

M

CM

S*U

W

MpM

IMC

nM

I

Youf SwnpH

NO

du ptMpN

IIUI

Map Reference No.

Claim No.

N" de reference sur la carte N 1 de concession mimere

Location (Twp. Lot, Con. or Lal. and Long.) Em

placement (canton, lot, concession, ou latitude et longitude)

J* t

* f ~

^,

jr

-

M c

?*."t'**-K

f ""/J

Property Name

Nom de la proprlete

Samp* Fooiig4rNivtiu di pi*-

ujvtmwM di I'tcninliHon On Mdi)

FronVDiTo/A

SunpH Linolh LonguwiMrtcninniion

Assays f/Analyses mineralurgiques

0204 (03/91)•For features such as foliation, bedding, schistosity, m

easured from the long axis of the core.

•Exemoles de caracterlstiques : foliation, schistosity stratification. L'angle est m

esure par rapport a I'axe longitudinal de la carotte.

l l

l l

l l

l i

i ,

t Additional credit available. See Assessment W

ork Regulation.t Des credits supplem

entaires sont offerts. Consulter lea reglements relatifs aux travaux devaluation.

N- - - - nans e,""-'—m

ule,,'""""'il des^nnn des personnel, le masculin est utilise au sens neutre.

Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines

Report off Work Conducted After Recording Claim

Mining Act

Transaction Number

'en . lal information collected on this form is obtained under the authority of the Mining Act. This information will be used for correspondence. Questions about lis collection should be directed to the Provincial Manager. Mining Lands. Ministry of Northern Development and Mines. Fourth Floor. 159 Cedar Street.

. Ontario. P3E 6A5. telephone (705) 670-7264.

isu actions: - Please type or print and submit in duplicate. — - Refer to the Mining Act and Regulations for requirements of filing assessment work or consult the Mining

Recorder.t - A separate copy of this form must be completed for each Work Group. ' - Technical reports and maps must accompany this form in duplicate. '

~ -A sketch, showing the claims the work is assigned to, must accompany this form.

Recorded Holders)

TClient No.'

Vk ss

' S,-f s-s t.

Telephone No.S/

fining Township/Area M or G Plan No.

Slortf " Performed

From: To.0"

Ve c Performed (Check One Work Group Only)Work Group

geotechnical Survey

1 Physical Work. Ljncluding Drilling

Rehabilitation

LOther Authorized /Vork

1 Assays

"Assignment from Reserve

Type

** -* * ^ fJ * f7sJSf- *^*~S (•ys-'/SSfr sr ff

S

.

"otaJ Assessment Work Claimed on the Attached Statement of Costs

to The Minister may reject for assessment work credit all or part of the assessment work submitted if the recorded holder cannot verify expenditures claimed in the statement of costs within 30 days of a request for verification.

}e ons and Survey Company Who Performed the Work (Give Name and Address of Author of Report)Name Address

r/^* t /.i sS

'.-.-,..~A~,~A.~ SI.

attach a schedule if necessary)

Verification of Beneficial Interest * See Note No. 1 on reverse side

l certify that at the time the work was performed, the claims covered in this work report were recorded in the current holder's name or held under a beneficial interest b :he current recorded holder.

Date

t,..?/?/

Recorded Holder or Agent (Signature)

Verification of Work Reportl certify that l have a personal knowledge of the facts set forth in this Work report, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and annexed report is true.

Mama and Address of Person Certifying

fCertilied

\

rebpone Date Certilied By (Signature)

:or Office Use Only S •"rTotal Value Cf. Recorded Date Recorded

Deemed Approval Date

Mining Recorder

Date Approved

Date Notice for Amendments Sent

Received Stamp

Ontaiio

'Ministry Of Northern Development and Mines

Ministere du Devetoppement du Nord et des mines

Statement of Costs for Assessment Credit

Etat des couts aux fins du credit devaluation

Mining Act/Loi sur les mines

Transaction NoJN0 de transaction

Personal information collecled on this form is obtained under the authority of the Mining Act. This information will be used to maintain a record and r~going status of the mining claim(s). Questions about this collection should l directed to the Provincial Manager. Minings Lands. Ministry of Northern l -velopment and Mines. 4th Floor. 159 Cedar Street. Sudbury. Ontario P3E 6A5. telephone (705) 670-7264.

Les renseignements personnels contenus dans la presente formule son) recueillis en vertu de la Lo! sur les mines et serviront a tenir a Jour un regisire des concessions minieres. Adresser toute question sur la collece de ces renseignements au chef provincial des terrains miniers. ministere du Developpement du Nord et des Mines. 159. rue Cedar. 4* etage. Sudbury (Ontario) P3E 6A5. telephone (705) 670-7264.

Direct Costs/Gouts directs

Type

Wages Salaires

Contractor's -•nd Consultant's

ees roils de

•'entrepreneur ^t de ('expert-

onseil

i oupplies Used Fournitures

•—tilisees

L

'-Equipment lental .ocatlon de

materiel

Description

Labour Main-d'oeuvreField Supervision Supervision sur le terrain

Type

Clfln5cj Hfjo-r

Type

Type

UlliAk't^ "b .15-

6n.no^|p)If

Amount Montan!

t?rO.-

3 033,-

Total Direct Costs Total des couts directs

Totals Total global

2oo.-

A

A231-

2. Indirect Costs/Couts indirects .* * Note: When claiming Rehabilitation work Indirect costs are not

allowable as assessment work.Pour le remboursement des travaux de rehabilitation, les couts indirects ne sont pas admissibles en tant que travaux devaluation.

Type

Transportation Transport

Food and Lodging Nourriture et hebergementMobilization and Demobilization Mobilisation et demobilisation

DescriptionType

Amount Montan!

Sub Total of Indirect Costs Total partiel des couts indirects

Amount Allowable (not greater than 20H of Direct Costs) Montan! admissible (n'excedant pas 20 H des couts directs)Total Value of Assessment Credit Valeur totale du credit (Total of Direct and Allowable devaluation Indirect costs) (TeW de* coOts directs

et Indirect* idnilsslblet

Totals Total global

ile: The recorded holder will be required to verify expenditures claimed in this statement of costs within 30 days of a request for verification. If verification is not made, the Minister may reject for assessment work all or part of the assessment work submitted.

Note : Le titulaire enregistn* sera tenu de verifier les depenses demandees dans le present eta! des couts dans les 30 jours suivant une demande a eel effet. Si la verification n'esl pas effectuee. le ministre pout rejeter tout ou une partie des travaux d'evaluatkm presentes.

Filing Discounts

Work filed within two years of completion is claimed at 1004fc of the above Total Value of Assessment Credit.

Remises pour depot

1. Les travaux deposes dans les deux ans suivant leur achevement sont rembourses a 100 "fc de la vateur totale susmentionnee du ere* devaluation.

Work filed three, four or five years after completion is claimed at 50"Vb of the above Total Value of Assessment Credit. See calculations below:

olal Value of Assessment Credit Total Assessment Claimed

x 0.50

2. Les travaux deposes trois, quatre ou cinq ans apres leur achevement sont rembourses a 50 *to de la valeur totale du credit devaluation susmentionne. Voir les calculs ckJessous.

Valeur totale du credit devaluationx 0.50

Evaluation lolale demandea

Certification Verifying Statement of Costs

l hereby certify:that the amounts shown are as accurate as possible and these costs were incurred while conducting assessment work on the lands shown on the accompanying Report of Work form.

-i -. *that as

(Recorded Holder. Agent. Position in Company)

to make this certification

Attestation de I'etat des couts

J'atteste par la presente :que les montants indiques sont le plus exact possible et que ces depenses ont ete engagees pour effectuer les travaux devaluation sur les terrains indiques dans la formule de rapport de travail ci-joint.

l am authorized Et qu'a litre de . je suis autorise(titulaire enregislre. representant. posle occupe dans la compagnie)

a faire cette attestation.

Signature

y"

Dale

0212 (04/91)

As c '7 /'/SNota : Dans cetta lormule. lorsqu'il designs-das personnes. le masculin est Utilise au sens neutte

1^l - -

1

-

\\* 1•\

A)

A.VA0

-

\

t

S.Ui

1CA0

-

N \*.

X*s0

*10

•s.

A

J\

U it)

1

A

0

r

b ^

^

A*

N.

[|i|

^e•3

I!jsy

CQ f I-S.&3

. ? X

w*

^^

U;

J3 * 3.

4|Fi

V! \3 j

l i 3t|S

51B

J^

Q.

ifi

\\

i0

\0rl

5 >

1 s."

"os

|1Has?"e

'Credits you are claiming in this report may be cut back. In order to minimize the adverse effects of such deletions, please indicate from which claims you wish to priorize the deletion of credits. Please mark (^) one of the following:1. B Credits are to be cut back starting with the claim listed last, working backwards.2. O Credits are to be cut back equally over all claims contained in this report of work.3. D Credits are to be cut back as priorized on the attached appendix.

In the event that you have not specified your choice of priority, option one will be implemented.

Note 1: Examples of beneficial interest are unrecorded transfers, option agreements, memorandum of agreements, etc., with respect to the mining claims.

Note 2: If work has been performed on patented or leased land, please complete the following:

l certify that the recorded holder had a beneficial interest in the patented or leased land at the time the work was performed.

Signature Date

9/

APPENDIX D


c~ ^APPENDIX D

SAMPLE LOCATION MAP


Claim 1003780Mcclintock Twp., Haliburton County,ONT.

Scale approx. l : 2000Samples collected by W.C. Ellerington

f-'

e. •tH

1 "1

• (f*

.r-',"i

/*- "^i

•"i"V*'-.1;

{rijL

V...";"

- . * . -.

V: " V'' "

* l"

r-^

. r

.t l t. -J-.

"r

ifl-

iiT,

\i

.

,:

X*

t ^

[- j-

f

J•s'

1

t,

•j

-

'C&S/Wjt/AGff?

PROJECTvtf-//^ /"/^/f* GR

SAMPLER t MA^V^/Mf /&D4 ' -. . '

SECTION i" '

STATION '

•^-/.r^.^

kx**xr */- AX*

n/^/s*/- ay/5l

vtcf9/ — a fs' \tV*JS9/ — Att

^;-*,,

\iiSff9t -tff

\i

jl

a

i

J11 i

J - '

1•l

i .t .

;

•-

J

no.

f

A

A

A

A-

/f

e 1

.

- in

x

^

1

C LAY

ORGANICS OOZE

1

—

\

—

j

^

^

GEOCHEMICAL SAMPLE CARD

ID -Mf Ik-* *-^ DATE t Auj3j f/ PAGE X. OF 4

ITA RECORDED BY' Ufc.*tfcr,**7Z~ W EATHER-- C A^U.

SCINT INSTRUMENT TYPE- INV. Not

M COLOUR; 'L

gMD i OK

MA

wK/l

RO BN

N

^

fie

ffi

YBK

^

tr

^

^

x

Jj|

(UlOTO

ff'

Iftr/r

,/r'(trfi

YDROLO ONDITKJK

W

^

^

^

^

^

f

M DC.P.S. COMMENTS

***** f-9''^-e *X flimn^f ' f-

9" *"e* T1* f-*7Ztfi** f 9 o

?'M-Z?T?F~ 6~^ZFZ?™?''**o-~,t ,T.*s-r*r..~ f**

/ASv.tr.s*^*.,.^*

?e.*.~.*ji o*~~3 7*S**'n 6C-o Wes/"

Z-*~llM~ L*.

-

'

-

-

O o u (O N^ 00 •* en

en

Chem

ex L

abs

Ltd.

Antriy

Dcnl

Chwr

tstt

* Oeo

tfw

r**'

Ref

ltner

ad A

Maye

ra

O X

m 3

m X c D

X D x TJ

3)

Q

m ea

212

Broo

ksba

nk A

vo.,

North

Van

couv

er

Briti

sh C

olum

bia.

Can

ada

V7J

2C1

PHON

E: 6

04-0

8442

21

To:

MIN

ISTR

Y O

F NO

RTHE

RN D

EVEL

OPM

ENT

AND

MIN

ES

BOX

100.

MAI

N ST

. DO

RSET

. ON

POA1

EO

Page

Num

ber

1-B

Tota

l Pag

ot

t Co

rtHta

ale D

ato:

3*OC

i Nw

ofco

No.

14

122:

P.

O. N

umbe

r :

Prpj

pd:

Cofn

mon

tsi

ATTN

: D.

VIL

LARD

SAMP

LED

ESO

tlPTI

Of

MCE

91-0

16MC

E 91

-017

wee

91-0

11M

CB

91-0

19

MCE

91*

020

MCE

91-

021

MCE

91-

023

MCE

91*

023

MCE

91-

024

PREP

CODE

217

217

217

,H1

217

217

—2J

J21

721

7

215

215

315

2tS 2(5

215

A- 5 2(5

2(5

MO p

p.(I

CP) <

l<

1<

l<

1<

1

l 1

< 1

< l 1

•a t

(IC

P) 0.19

0.05

0.04

9,04

0.02

0.05

0.01

2.30

2.55

•i p

pi(I

CP)

6( 13—

i- t 9 11 66 24

P pp

i(I

CP) 44

045

050

052

034

0

610

520

790

950

Pbp

piA

U

10 6—

— J- 6 2 6 10 12

CERT

IFIC

ATE

OF A

NALY

SIS

A912

2306

St p

pi(I

CP)

(9 66 67 94 104 (3 64 331

370

Ti l

(IC

P) 0.05

0.01

0.01 O.OJ

L<

0.0

1

0.01

0.02

0.31

0.37

v PP

I(IC

P)

21 5—

— f 2 7 5 73 76

H pp

i(I

CP) <

10<

10<

10<

10<

10

< 10

< 10 10 10

ZB pp

i(IC

P)

66 31—

——

— ft

"JO 31 42 (0 90 12

AU p

pbAT

S

( 4

( 4

* f2

< 12 (

6

K 4

K 12 <

2 4

Pd p

pbAF

S

( 4

< 4

^ 12

< 12 (

6

( 4

< 12 (

2 6

Pt p

pbAF

S ^ 10

( 10

* 3l

^ 3ff

( 15

< 10

< 30 <

5(

5

Chem

ex L

abs

Ltd,

AnMy

ttOBf

CI M

I i Mi *

Goo

tfwrir

ii * H

ogMo

rad A

irayw

ft 21

2 Br

eoks

bank

A ve

., No

rth V

anco

uver

Br

itish

Col

umbi

a, C

anad

a V7

J 2C

t PH

ONE

: 604

-864

4221

To:

MIN

ISTR

Y O

F NO

RTHE

RN D

EVEL

OPM

ENT

AND

MIN

ES

BOX

100.

MAI

N ST

. DO

RSET

, ON

POA1

EO

Page

Num

ber

l-A

Total

Pag

os

J Ce

rtific

ate D

ato:

3-OC

T-01

Inv

oice N

o. 1-8

1223

00

P.O.

Num

ber

:Pr

ojec

t: Co

nvno

nts:

ATTN

: D.

VIL

LARD

SAMP

LEDE

SCRI

PTIO

N

MCE

91-0

16WC

E 91

-017

WE

Jl-O

llMC

E ?1

-919

WCE

91-

020

MCE

91-

021

urr

ai.n

)3M

CE 9

1-02

3M

CE 9

1-02

4

PREP

CODE

217

217

217

217

217

217

an 217

217

2(5

2(5

2(3

2(5

2(5

2(5

3M 2(5

2(5

Ag p

piAA

S < 0.

2^

0.2 * 2-a

< 0.

2<

0.2

< 0.2

(03

,(

0.2

^ 0.

2

Al

t(IC

P) 1.32

0.55

0.52

0.66

0.42

0.10

0.61

6.97

7.52

Ba p

pi(I

CP) 1(

012

013

017

014

0

120

130

(20

990

Be p

pi(IC

P) t 0.

5<

0.5

. l"

-?.

*-0*

5^

o.s

* 0.

5t

0.5

t 0.

5l

0.5

Bip

p.(IC

P) * 2

( 2

< 2

Ta ^ 2

( 2 a

( 2

^ 2

CERT

tHCA

TE O

F AN

ALYS

IS

A91

2230

6

Ca t

(ICP)

-

1.09

0.59

0.64

Q. (2

0.(4

0.70

0.57

2.35

2.33

Cd p

pi(I

CP) 1.

00.

50.

51.

00.

5

0.5

0.5

^ o.

s<

0.5

Co p

pi(I

CP)

13 2 1 3 2 2 a 22 14

Ci

ppi

(IC

P) 343 35 4 4 4 9 12 344 96

cupp

i(I

CP)

39 13—

ll 9 6 16 13 31 21

Fe 1

(ICP) 1.

490.

42 J .36

.21

0.32

0.64

0.5

03.

543.

62

K t

(ICP) 0.

100.

040.

030.

030.

02

0.04

0.07

1.83

2.25

Mg*

(ICP) 1.

210.

160.

100.

130.

11

0.09

0.11

2.63

1.26

Hn p

pi(I

CP) 21

5 (5—

5f 95 130 15 570

5(5

O

"S o (O O m m

x CO (/l l •n 3) x •o D

O m

CERT

IFIC

ATIO

N:

*r-

j *l;

v: i- f."

j-*

'

*

••••i.

vi -

"*

. i

x *

.*

PROJECTi //ortJuSoiJf-

SAMPLER //Cfsstf-Z*

SECTION' '

STATION - :

m *. , .

i/i^e^y/- o //

Mf f. f 9/ - A/ f\

Mr ft / - /i/t/'

U/ff f 9 f - O S?t~

i j

1t

'i

i

j - -

1

1

I

i

t

-.;!

ISOIL PROFILE

#

1

4

A

A

A

-

-l

5 to n t

^

i

r

j y

, ^ G EOCHEMICAL SAMPLE CARD

"GR'ID NO .4*" *** ' DATE /^/?f PAGE/.. JOF LDATA RECORDED BY * t*fC GS'^-'+jTi., W EATHER: C.A.K6/. 7~*~y Sg "c. 4

SCINT INSTRUMENT TYPE- INV. No 'ft fcj COLOUR1 in Z P L

5 ! K

t?

C FM

Z f* ea

' f

D N N

Rv

Y 3K

V

lUUJ -JUtt

o

^

S

5^J

lH t -•l

:Q |

V

96*

W

9V

W

^YonoLOCONDITION

w

tf

Is*

l/

t/

V

J

-

1M D

-

C.P.S. COMMENTS

•it.fir.f-M-****^-

tf^.*~~-fLMie/^ v^

E903

v**t*fr~ f r**S.,~,*JL**

*f 7^~^ff^~rrf*f^A^ rJ+'tffAflftf*^*

^TOO/* f fS^n a l*Yrl *i /•^t-'? e/iH

'

'j rf A

f-

^

f-

^

Che

mex

Lab

s Lt

d.An

alytic

^ Cht

mliu

' Gto

cham

litt *

R*fl

lit*rt

d Au

ayar

a61

76 T

lmbe

rtea

Blvd

., M

litits

auga

, O

ntar

io, C

anad

a L4

W2S

3 PH

ON

^: 4

16-4

24-2

606

To:

MIN

ISTR

Y OP

NO

RTHE

RN D

EVEL

OPM

ENT

AND

MIN

ES

BOX

180.

MAI

N ST

. D

OR

SEf.O

N

PDA

1EO

Prel

ect:

Com

men

t*:

ATTN

: DA

VE V

ILLA

RD

Page

Num

ber

:1-A

To

tal P

ages

' 1

Certi

ficat

e Da

te: 1

2-JU

N-91

In

voice

No.

-.101

1588

6 P.

O. N

umbe

r :

SAMP

X1DB

SOUP

TIOM

•3-9

1-01

0•3

-91-

011

•3-9

1-01

2•3

-91-

013

•3-9

1-01

4

•3-9

1-01

5

ra CO 217

217

217

21'

217

217D DI 29

829

8 29

829

829

8

296

CERT

IFIC

ATE

OF A

NALY

SIS

A91 1

5886

Au p

pb

Ag

Al

Aa

Ba

Ba

Bi

Ga

Cd

Co

Cr

Cu

Fa

Ga

Hg

X I*

Mg

Mn

FAtA

A pp

i Ip

pap

pm

pp

Bp

pa

IppappB

ppnpja

tp

pappa

* PP

* *

PP"

< 5

K 0.

2 1.

34

< t

40

< 0.

5 <

2 0.

28

2.5

3 45

7

1.08

10

K

1 0.

04

10

0.21

95

5 <

0.2

0.73

<

S 90

K

0.5

< 2

1.00

18

.5

2 24

25

0.

58

< 10

*!

1 0.

02

30

0.11

15

0 <

S <

t.^

0.67

<

5 11

0 K

0.5

< 2

0.62

1.

5 2

15

28

0.60

K

10

< 1

0.02

30

0.

08

75<

5 ^.2

1.

29

< i

50

K 0.

5 <

2 0.

24

1.0

2 61

20

0.

71

10

< 1

0.03

30

0.

17

75<

t <

0.2

0.68

<

5 10

0 <

0.5

< 2

0.44

1.

0 1

16

26

0.26

K

10

< l

0.01

30

0.

05

45

< t

<0.

2 0.

89

< S

90

K 0.

5 <

2 0.

47

1.0

7 32

33

0.

80

< 10

<

1 0.

03

50

0.16

80

CER

TIFI

CA

TIO

N-

3E1

Che

mex

Lab

s Lt

d,An

alyoc

al C

hem

ltu' G

eocr

wmlim

* Re

glum

d As

iay*

n51

75 T

imbe

rlea

Blvd

., M

isslss

auga

, O

ntar

io, C

anad

a L4

W2S

3 PH

ONE

: 416

-624

-280

6

To:

MIN

ISTR

Y OP

NO

RTHE

RN D

EVEL

OPM

ENT

AND

MIN

ESBO

X 19

0, M

AIN

ST.

DORS

ET, O

N PO

A1EO

Page

Num

ber

:1-B

To

tal P

ages

:1

Certi

ficat

e Da

te: 1

2-JU

N-91

In

voice

No.

: 1

9115

886

P.O.

Num

ber

:Pr

ojec

t: Co

mm

ents

:AT

TN:

DAVE

VIL

LARD

CERT

IFIC

ATE

OF A

NALY

SIS

A911

5886

SJMPL

K DE

SCRI

PTIO

N

fOt-9

1-01

0 10

-91-

011

IO-9

1-01

2 fd

-91-

013

10-9

1-01

4

KX

-91-

01S

PRBP

COOK

217

217

217

217

217

217

298

298

298

298

298

298

Mo

Hi

Mi

P Pb

Sb

Se

Sr

Si

Tl

U

V H

In

ppn

1 pp

n pp

i pp

n pp

n pp

n pp

n 1

ppn

ppn

ppn

ppn

ppn

< 1

0.02

11

64

0 4

< S

3 10

0.

12

10

K 10

43

K

10

204

< 1

0.02

11

87

0 18

<

5 2

75

0.01

10

K

10

13

< 10

IS

IS

< 1

0.01

10

83

0 2

K 5

2 51

0.

01

10

* 10

13

K

10

118*

<

1 0.

03

11

320

< 2

< S

4 14

0.

09

20

< 10

31

K

10

92

< 1

0.01

7

790

2 <

S 1

45 K

0.0

1 10

*!

10

9 K

10

50<

1 0.

02

18

800

4 <

i 2

36

0.02

10

<

10

30

K 10

10

2

CERT

IFIC

ATIO

N: ______ f

*}, (f-

"JT

'l

" ~

JT

BRIGHT LAKE CLAIMS

CLAIM 1008780

LOCATION MAP

*. 8

ib/i

ib,

le

i. *

t. 7

\ \

/o

V

1bA

x" N

X-—^

•*X M 7

/l '

lvf^; * l•* l^TSbT- \

1 i' . PPM/i A- T7 7 y"7 *9 *

. J 1 *r if i I t.

//

s ^L V'M*:- A^-^....\ v*-\bed , X .*

V ^ ™

" \\

Felsic

Intermediate

Mafic

Ultramafic

massive

foliated

strong l y

schis tose

d

e

f-*

very fine grained

ft t ine grained

j~ medium grained

(f c oarse grained

banded

recumbent folding

porphy roblas t i c

h mafic blotches

SYMBOLS

,-11 '".) limit of outcrop

* * local blocks

dip and strike of gneissic foliation

lineation, fold axis

geological contact, intern

jointing

control 1 1 in- , i ni or flawe

bountlaries of phy s i o^rapli i c feature

cliff, ticks on low side

spruce bog, cedar swamp

claim post

X ( s

A land survey post

***^* seasonal track, ATV road

TT Trf-nrh

t^i boulder

•••"""- l)c'.iver dam

•i' iiuirs h

x s N slope

PF36 rock samp le

K f graphitepo pyrrhotite

py pyrite

cp chalcopyrite

o

t 1/8M A \

\1M

\-

Ibd

\ #si\ \ \ \ \ \ \

\ \\ \l Ml \

200

/*\\- 5 \ -x\ \* PF10 \ X ( \ \ \ii- , .i.. "' -;"\ \.\ \ x

\i- \ '" \ \\ V1b V * \ \ 1 \ \———— \ \ \ \ ^ \ \

\ \ ——b*2\ '

\ \

\

\ CLAIM 1040261

GEOLOGY OFW. C. ELLERINGTON CLAIM GROUPS

MCCLINTOCK TOWNSHIP, HALIBURTON COUNTYONTARIO

Scale ' 1 -2000

0 100 300

metre*

NTS 31 E X 7Surveyed by R Fucher U A D i October, 1991 M AK '

\ ; S f I 0 \ \ /^*

Scale l 50,000

LOCATION MAPL t (I l' N D

IXIUIU CHAIN SIXF\ ",-

\ l ^ \ t J very fine grained

/3 fine grained

medium grained

coarse grained

d banded

e recumbent folding

porphyroblastic

'texture

liloti.hu:>

l \ * *,| S^ ^,.ML A V f

-'.J V V

l mn l of outcrop

local blockb

land survtiy post

seasonal track, ATV road

Trench

boulder

clip and strike of gneisbic. foliation


geological cont.ict, mf cried

jointing

-—— control line, ml or l

of phy-j i ogr.iph icl o .tt ii r i'

^— -.HI, l

J|t- bpruce bog, c c il 11 r swamp

Q claim post

pyrite

chalcopyrite



Scale ' 1 ' 2000

100metres

NTS 31 E /7Surveyed by P Pitcher October, 1991

CLAIM 1040373 CLAIM 1126088MM**

CLAIM 1040374 CLAIM 1040301

LOCATION MAP

COMPOSITION

Folsic

Intermediate

Mafic

Ultramafic

S C Oil: l 30,000

l. K fi F N D

TEXTURE (JRATN SIZE

a

b

c strongly schistose

massive JL very fine grained

foliated fl f ine grained

}~ medium grained

f coarse grained

d banded

e recumbent folding

f porphyroblastic

g Augen Texture

h mafic blotches

( -- ) limit of outcrop

local blocks

dip and strike of gneissic foliation


geological contact, inferred

jointing

control line, cut or flagged

boundaries of physiographic feature

cliff, ticks on low side

spruce bog, cedar swamp

claim post

Tr

PPM

gf

po

pyC J)

land survey post

seasonal track, ATV road

Trench

boulder

beaver dam marsh

slope

rock sample

graphite pyrrhotite

pyrite

chalcopyrite

LINTOCK 220



Scolt t i i2000100 200

mttrtt NTS 31E/7

Survtytd by R Pitcher Octobtr, 1991 MAP 3

BRIGHT LAKE CLAIMS

CLAIM 1008780

INSIHUMINI CUONICSIMI6

CLAIM 1040261

IHANSMIIHH A NNAI'OI IS, M AHYIANI)

VLF EM SURVEYW, C. ELLERINGTON CLAIM GROUPS


o

Scale : 1 i 2000

100 200

metres

NTS 31 E X 7

230SUIWLYI I) OY W C l l l f RINGTON

Jill Y TO NOVfMBtH, 1991 MAP 4

LOCATION MAP

CLAIM 1156309L A A L

t.lf

L. 13

'J1040373

104**** —

II?6ORR

l \lower

) Lane

/Scale 1 50,000

i i?

km

L. 14LEGEND

-iOSfe -IP'S, O •MOX **0*

l l

QUADRATURE\

Y IN PHASE

L. 19

L 16

INSTRUMENT: GEONICS EM 16

TRANSMITTER. ANNAPOl IS, MARYL AND

VLF EM SURVEYW. C. ELLERINGTON CLAIM GROUPS


Scale ! 1 ' 2000

100 200metres

NTS 31 E S 7

Qia OPB1-16B MCCUNTOCI 240

SUHVtYED BY W C. FLLERINGTON

JUI Y TO NOVEMBER, 1991 MAP 5

LOCATION MAP

CLAIM 1156309

Scale . 1 i 50,OOO i 2

INSTRUMENT: QEONIC8 EM It

TRANSMITTER: CUTLER, NAME

VLF EM SURVEYW, C. ELLERINGTON CLAIM GROUPS


Scale ! 1 *2000

100 agomatrai

NTS 31 E /7SURVEYED BY W.C. ETLLERINGTON

JULY TO NOVEMBER, 1091 MAP 5a250

CLAIM 1040373 CLA IM 11 26088

b ea l e l 50,000 o 1 2

QUADRATURE

INSTRUMCNT: GFONICS EM 16

CLAIM 1040374 CLAIM 1040301

KANSMITHR A NNAI'OMS, MAHYIANI)

VLF EM SURVEYW. C. ELLERINGTON CLAIM GROUPS


Scale 1 - 2 000100 200

metres

NTS 3 11 X 7

OP81-168 MCCLINTOCK 260SIIIWI VI D I1Y W i l l l l HINt.lON

JUl Y If) NilVI M ill M , 1991 MAP 6

MCCLINTOCK TOWNSHIP, HALIBURTON COUNTY, ONTARIO W.C. … · 2017-01-16 · PETER FISCHER Rock Units...

Documents

Transcript of MCCLINTOCK TOWNSHIP, HALIBURTON COUNTY, ONTARIO W.C. … · 2017-01-16 · PETER FISCHER Rock Units...