MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016brakes-source.co.uk/assetfiles/MCA---Restaurant... ·...
Transcript of MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016brakes-source.co.uk/assetfiles/MCA---Restaurant... ·...
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016 1
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Disclaimer
Copyright: MCA, September 2016.
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or stored in a retrieval system, in any form or by any means, electrical, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise without the prior consent of the publishers. The views and forecasts presented in this report represent independent findings and conclusions drawn from a study of the Restaurant market by MCA. Main sources of information include published information, opinions and information shared by interviewees with MCA during the period of study.
This report has been produced under significant time constraints to ensure that the information contained is as up-to-date as possible. Great care has been taken to ensure that all information contained in this report is accurate, free from bias, and fully describes the latest developments in the UK Restaurant market, as of September 2016.
However, MCA can accept no responsibility for any investment decision made on the basis of this information or for any omissions or inaccuracies that may be contained in this report.
This report has been produced in good faith and independently of any operator or supplier to the industry. We trust that it will be of significant value to all readers.
MCA10 Ely PlaceLondon EC1N 6RYPart of William Reed Business Media Ltd.
2
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016 3
Contents
Introduction and background
Executive summary
Market
Competitive landscape
Consumer insight
Consumer typology analysis
Bespoke consumer research
Future outlook
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Report scope
• Detailed market sizing of the UK Restaurant market –current and projected.
• Analysis of the size and growth of different Restaurant market segments.
• Analysis of consumer participation, frequency, spend and behaviours over time.
• Comprehensive overview of competitive landscape, including physical expansion and financial performance of leading brands over time, KPI rankings and operator profiles.
• Consumer typology analysis.
• Bespoke consumer survey on restaurant visit habits.
Research methodology
• 36,000 online surveys (6,000 per month) through MCA Eating Out PanelTM, Q2 2015 and Q2 2016.
• 1,000 online interviews with UK consumers on their eating out habits.
• Extracts from MCA Brands & Corporates service and synthesis with wider market sizing databases.
• Desk research: news articles and trade press, company websites and industry associations.
Publish details
• 30 September 2016
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND
Introduction and background
4
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Key terms and definitions
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND
Term Definition
All-day dining Food and drink offer from breakfast through to late-night.
Branded contemporary fast food Food served quickly at the counter and has healthy or ‘newer’ cuisine focus, e.g. Itsu, Leon, Pod and Wasabi.
Branded delivery-focused fast food Branded fast food operators with no or very limited seating in outlets, e.g. Domino’s, Papa John’s and Pizza Hut Delivery.
Branded restaurant market Branded/managed/franchised pubs, branded fast food and branded full-service restaurants.
Branded traditional fast food Food served quickly; typically served at the counter; predominantly burger, chicken or pizza, e.g. Domino’s, KFC, McDonald's.
Branded/managed pubs Owned by managed pub groups and restaurant groups, with consistent brand and/or menu, e.g. Beefeater, JD Wetherspoon.
Branded service-led restaurants / Casual restaurants / Chain restaurants
Sit-down meal in a casual environment; fast efficient table service or counter ordering, e.g. Nando's, PizzaExpress, Prezzo.
Coffee shops, sandwich bars, cafés Brands and independents serving espresso-based beverages and food, e.g. Caffè Nero, Costa, Pret, Starbucks.
Contract catering On site catering provided within public sector and workplace environments. Typically canteen restaurant catering.
Fine dining restaurants High quality establishments; staff are highly trained and wear more formal attire. Michelin starred or AA Rosette.
Grab & Go Food that can be purchased off the shelf and taken out to eat, typically from supermarkets and convenience stores.
Independents Owned by one person or group; not part of a branded chain and often ethnic cuisine or fast food.
Leisure Food offer secondary to activity e.g. cinema, hotels, fitness.
NPSNet Promoter Score is a customer recommendation metric. It can be as low as -100 (everybody is a detractor) or as high as +100 (everybody is a promoter). An NPS that is positive is felt to be good, and an NPS of 50+ is excellent.
Revisit IntentionConsumers are asked “How likely are you to revisit on a scale of 1-10, where 1 = not at all likely and 10 = extremely likely”. This is a customer loyalty metric. A score over 8 is good and over 9 is excellent.
Service-led restaurants Branded, independent and fine dining restaurants with table service or at the very least semi-counter service.
Small chain Five or less outlets with consistent branding and/or food offer. Also applies to international brands with five or less UK outlets.
Street food Freshly prepared, authentic, good quality food sold in a street, often from a portable stall and at value prices.
Tenanted/leased pubs Owned by pub companies and leased/licensed to individuals or small franchisees. The manager is often tied to the brewery.
Travel Motorway service areas, petrol stations, train stations, airports and ferry ports.
5
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016 6
Channel Operator Examples
Chain restaurants/Branded casual restaurants
Carluccio’s, Gourmet Burger Kitchen, Nando’s, PizzaExpress, Prezzo, Wagamama, etc.
Coffee shops/Cafés Caffè Nero, Costa Coffee, Starbucks, Independent coffee shops, etc.
Contemporary chains Branded restaurant chains that launched after 2006, e.g. Byron, Franco Manca and Wahaca.
Department Stores/Garden Centres/Supermarket Cafés
M&S Café, Debenhams Café, Tesco Café, etc.
Fast Food Restaurants Burger King, KFC, McDonald’s, Wasabi, Independent take-away/fast food, etc.
Fine Dining Restaurants Michelin starred, AA Rosette, Premium dining experience venues, etc.
Hotels Independent and group managed hotels
Leisure Facilities Facilities where dining was not the primary activity: at a cinema, leisure centre, sports centre, gym, etc.
Independent Restaurants Chinese, Indian, Italian, Thai, etc.
Pub Restaurants Beefeater, Brewers Fayre, Gastro Pub, Harvester, Wetherspoon, Toby Carvery, Local pub, etc.
Sandwich Retailers Boots, Greggs, Pret A Manger, petrol station operators, etc.
Street Food Vendors Stall vendors in food courts, markets, festivals and other outdoor locations
Supermarkets To-Go Food To-Go sections of Asda, M&S, Sainsbury's, Tesco, Waitrose, etc.
Vending MachinesStandard Vending Machine (e.g. Klix, Cold Drinks machine, snack machine, etc.)Gourmet Vending Machine (e.g. Starbucks To-Go, Costa Express, Simply Coffee, etc.)
Workplaces Offices, industrial units and schools/universities: restaurant, canteen, on-site café, etc.
Key terms and definitions – consumer insight channels
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016 7
Term Definition
Average spend Typical spend per person per eating out occasion, including food and drink (based on bill/receipt).
Breakfast Food and/or beverage consumed, usually first meal of the day.
Day-partsSix defined times of day when food is typically consumed: breakfast, morning snack, lunch, afternoon snack, dinner and late night snack.
Dinner Food eaten in the evening, usually third meal of the day.
Average number of visits per head per month
The average number of visits per person per month, derived from asking consumers how often they visit different types of establishment and for different meal times (day-parts).
Incidence By day-part: share of visits on which a food or drink item is consumed.
Lunch Food consumed in the middle of the day, usually second meal of the day.
Millennials Adults currently aged 18-34.
MissionsDerived from the following single choice question: “Which of the following best describes the primary reason for eating/drinking out of the home on this occasion?”.
NeedsDerived from the following multiple choice question: “Why did you choose this establishment for your breakfast/lunch/dinner/snack? (Please rank the Top 3 reasons)”.
NPSNet Promoter Score: taken from consumers ranking the likelihood of recommending a brand/operator from 0-10; scoring 0 = highly unlikely to 10 = highly likely; scores of 7 &8 are removed, the detractor sub-total score (ranked 0-6) is subtracted from the promoter sub-total score 9+10 to give a net figure .
Participation Number of consumers who eat out (defined as all except those claiming to ‘rarely’ or ‘never’ eat out).
Revisit IntentionConsumer scoring to indicate how likely they are to revisit a brand/operator; scoring 1 = highly unlikely to 10 = highly likely. This is a customer loyalty metric. A score over 8 is good and over 9 is excellent.
Key terms and definitions – consumer insight terms
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016 8
Term Definition
Millennials – The Explorers 18-24 year olds across different social grades and with or without children.
Millennials – The New Parents 25-34 year olds across different social grades with children.
Millennials – The Home Builders 25-34 year olds across different social grades with or without children.
Generation X – Established families 35-54 year olds in the ABC1 social grade with children.
Generation X – Humble households 35-54 year olds in the C2DE social grade with children.
Generation X – Aspiring Child Free 35-54 year olds in the ABC1 social grade without children.
Generation X – Functional Child Free 35-54 year olds in the C2DE social grade without children.
Grey Pound – Greying Generation 55-65 year olds across different social grades and with or without children.
Grey Pound – Golden Oldies 65+ year olds across different social grades and with or without children.
Key terms and definitions – consumer typology
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016 9
Contents
Introduction and background
Executive summary
Market
Competitive landscape
Consumer insight
Consumer typology analysis
Bespoke consumer research
Future outlook
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Executive summary
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Growth continues for Branded restaurant market, but at slowing rates of physical expansion, indicating the ‘space race’ has peaked.
• The Branded restaurant market is forecast to grow by an annual turnover growth rate of 4.7% in 2016 to reach a value of £21.1bn, significantly ahead of the 1.1% for the total Restaurant market, and a total value of £53.9bn. Branded traditional and contemporary fast food, branded restaurants and managed pubs are all seeing robust growth this year, outpacing independent segments.
• Yet growth in the Branded restaurant market is expected to slow down, from a turnover growth rate of 5.5% in 2015 to 4.7% in 2016, in part due to outlet growth declining from 3.8% to 3.3%. Many pub and restaurant brands have expanded rapidly in recent years and are curbing growth, indicating the ‘space race’ of the last few years may have peaked.
• As expansion rates falter, restaurant operators must place greater emphasis on delivering a contemporary experience and better execution to drive growth, particularly those brands looking to appeal to the lucrative and more youthful, millennial market.
Branded restaurant growth waning as expansion falters and competition tightens.
• Turnover growth for Branded service-led restaurants is set to decrease from 6.8% in 2015 to 5.3% in 2016. Similarly, outlet growth is set to slow down from 4.0% to 2.9%. A number of established players – not least Café Rouge, Frankie & Benny’s and Strada – are the focus of estate rationalisation this year. Competition in the market is tighter than ever, and established brands need to refresh their offers to meet contemporary demands.
• Macroeconomic factors around weakening business confidence are contributing to operators scaling back expansion plans, as is the increasing difficulty of securing sites. Yet growth in the branded segment is still among the strongest in the Eating Out market, fuelled by a sizeable group of rapidly expanding, newer players.
Emerging brands showing strongest growth, increasing marketplace dynamism.
• Brands with less than 100 outlets are set to grow turnover and outlets by 9.7% and 7.8% on average, respectively, compared with an average of 5.8% and 3.5% for all leading brands in the market. In contrast, brands with over 200 outlets are in line to grow by 4.2% and 2.0% for turnover and outlets, respectively, underperforming against the average.
• The fastest growing brands – CAU, Five Guys, Franco Manca, Turtle Bay and Leon – are examples of brands offering a contemporary experience through specialisation in a product, adventurous cuisine or healthier eating focus. Service, environments and atmosphere are equally important to capture the minds of contemporary consumers.
Key consumer metrics rise for restaurants and pubs, with contemporary restaurant brands stealing share of visits.
• Average visit spend has risen in all restaurant channels at all day-parts, with fine dining at lunch the only exception. Higher spend levels relate, in-part, to a more affluent customer profile in all key restaurant channels. Female spend has increased most, with 25-49s driving rising levels in chain restaurants.
• Contemporary chain restaurants (opened in the last 10 years) have played a crucial role in growth of the restaurant chain channel, accounting for a rising share of lunch and dinner visits. Contemporary chains, such as Byron, Côte and Wahaca, attract a larger share of 18-24s and higher earning consumers than chains in general, with the food quality, environment and atmosphere being much bigger draws.
• 22% of contemporary chain visits are get togethers, but it is special occasions that stand out, accounting for 18% of contemporary chain visits, which is double the proportion in total chain restaurants. The brands are providing the experiences that modern consumers seek.
Millennials and Established Families are the most valuable customers.
• Three Millennial segments (18-34s) account for 29% of UK adult population but represent 46% of the total visits and 43% of the total spend in the restaurant market.
• Established Families (ABC1 35-54, children at home) account for 10% of adult population but contribute 14 % of total visits and 14% of total expenditure. 55+ account for 36% of adult population however only contribute 18% of total visits and 21% of the total spend.
Experience and execution increasingly important as expansion rates decline.
• MCA expects the Branded restaurant market to continue seeing annual sales growth of c.4.7% between 2016-2019, but this is down from the 2015 peak of 5.5%. The slowing 3.3% average annual outlet growth is significant and will focus more attention on existing store growth and passing on price rises to offset increasing cost pressures.
• The impact of rising National Living wage rates, higher business rates and food input costs will highlight the need for more skilful management of menu prices and also, of consumers’ value perceptions of restaurant brands.
• Contemporisation, both in terms of proposition execution and consumer experience, is becoming increasingly central to driving growth. Exploring new trading formats, hybridisation, premiumisation and faster NPD will also become more important levers for growth in the post-space race market.
Road to growth changing lanes from expansion to contemporary experiences and execution.
10
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Contents
Introduction and background
Executive summary
Market
Section summary
Market analysis
Competitive landscape
Consumer insight
Consumer typology analysis
Bespoke consumer research
Future outlook
11
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Market – section summary
12
MARKET
Growth continues for Branded restaurant market, but at a slowing rate.
• The Branded restaurant market is forecast to grow by an annual turnover growth rate of 4.7% in 2016 to reach a value of £21.1bn, compared with 1.1% for the total Restaurant market, and a total value of £53.9bn. Branded traditional and contemporary fast food, branded restaurants and managed pubs are all seeing robust growth this year, outpacing independent segments.
• Yet growth in the Branded restaurant market is expected to slow down, from a turnover growth rate of 5.5% in 2015 to 4.7% in 2016, and an outlet growth rate of 3.8% to 3.3%. Many pub and restaurant brands have expanded very rapidly in recent years and are now slowing down, indicating the ‘space race’ of the last few years may have peaked.
• Overall the Total Restaurant market continues to experience a net decline in outlets, with outlets set to decrease by -0.8% to 119,491 in 2016. This is driven by ongoing closures at independent restaurants and tenanted & leased pubs, two large segments that have a major impact on the overall market.
Brands beating independents across all segments.
• Branded segments account for 16.2% of outlets and 39.2% of turnover in the total Restaurant market, up from 15.5% and 36.9% in 2015, respectively. Managed pubs in particular have increased their share of the market, driven primarily by accelerating conversions of tenanted pubs. Branded segments continue to achieve considerably higher sales per store, on the back of greater economic resources of parent companies, better capabilities for attracting investment, and consequently, greater access to more expensive, higher-footfall sites.
Fast food winning share from pubs and restaurants.
• Fast food accounts for 22.4% of total value in the Restaurant market, up 1.2pp year-on-year. The low-ticket segment’s share of outlets is also up 1.9pp to 32.4%. The fast food channel is buoyed by a relatively better-performing independent component. The continuing net decline in outlets of independent restaurants and tenanted & leased pubs is dragging down their respective segments.
• Pubs are still the largest segment, claiming c.40% of both outlets and turnover. Service-led restaurants account for 28% of outlets and 38% of sales.
Growth slowing down for restaurant chains as established brands see mixed performance.
• Turnover growth for Branded service-led restaurants is set to decrease from 6.8% in 2015 to 5.3% in 2016. A number of established players –not least Café Rouge, Frankie & Benny’s and La Tasca – are rationalising their estates this year. Competition in the market is tighter than ever, and established brands need to refresh their offers to meet contemporary demands.
• Macroeconomic factors around weakening business confidence are also contributing to operators scaling back expansion plans, as is the increasing difficulty of securing sites. Yet growth in the branded segment is still among the strongest in the Eating Out market, fuelled by a sizeable group of rapidly expanding, newer players.
Latin American cuisine to see strongest growth, followed by South East Asian and Burger brands.
• Branded operators serving food from Latin/South America are expected to see outlet growth of 35% in 2016, reaching a total of 135 outlets. The formidable growth in this segment is spearheaded by Rodizio Preto, expected to double in outlets to 10, CAU, set to grow by 57% to 22 outlets, and Turtle Bay, expected to expand by 48% to 37 outlets. However, Latin American food is still only expected to account for 2.8% of the Branded casual restaurant market. Strong growth is also forecast for South East Asian (22%) and Burgers (20%).
• The largest cuisine segment continues to be Pizza/pasta, which holds a 30% share of the total Branded service-led market. All leading brands in this segment are expected to continue to expand this year, including PizzaExpress, Pizza Hut Restaurants and Prezzo, as well as smaller players Franco Manca and Wildwood.
• MCA expects the appetite for more exotic cuisines to continue over the next few years, fuelled by greater consumer food knowledge and demand for adventurousness.
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Contents
Introduction and background
Executive summary
Market
Section summary
Market analysis
Competitive landscape
Consumer insight
Consumer typology analysis
Bespoke consumer research
Future outlook
13
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
UK Eating Out market landscapeUK Eating Out market value to reach £87bn in 2016. MCA forecasts the total UK Eating Out market to reach a value of £87.2bn in 2016, comprising a total of 331,293 outlets by December 2016. The market consists of three main sub-sectors: Retail, Travel & Leisure; Hotels, Pubs & Restaurants; and Contract Catering. Hotels, Pubs & Restaurants is easily the largest sub-sector, accounting for 72% of total turnover.
MARKET
14
UK Eating Out Market 2016E: £87.2bn – 331,293 (Value – Outlets)
Retail, Travel & Leisure: £19.5bn – 100,825
Retail
Coffee Shops
Sandwich Bars
Bakery Stores
Dep’t Stores/ Supermarket
Cafés
Supermarket Grab & Go
Convenience Store Grab & Go
Travel
Roadside & MSA
Petrol Forecourts
Railway Stations
Airports
Ports
Leisure
Sports Clubs
Event Catering
Stadia
Visitor Attractions
Entertainment Venues
Hotels, Pubs & Restaurants: £62.9n – 167,383
Hotels
Full Service
Budget
Guest Houses
Holiday Parks
Conference Centres
Pubs & Bars
Managed, Branded & Franchised
Tenanted and Leased
Independent & Free of tie
Social clubs
Restaurants
Service-Led
Fine Dining
Independent
Branded
Fast Food
Branded Traditional
Branded Contemporary
Independent inc. Street Food
Contract Catering: £4.8bn – 63,084
Business & Industry
Contracted
In-House
Public Sector
Defence
Justice
Healthcare
Local Authorities
Oil Rigs
Education
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
UK Eating Out market – Hotels, Pubs & Restaurants
MARKET
15
Hotels, Pubs & Restaurants £62.9bn – 167,383 (value – outlets)
Hotels £9.0bn – 47,893
Full service
£7.7bn – 10,618
Budget
£0.6bn – 3,675
Guest houses & lodges
£0.6bn – 30,832
Holiday parks
£0.1bn – 2,410
Conference centres £0.01bn – 358
Pubs & Bars £21.5bn – 47,458
Managed, Branded & Franchised
£9.9bn – 9,318
Tenanted & Leased £4.2bn – 17,510
Independent & Free of tie
£7.3bn – 17,900
Social Clubs
£0.2.bn – 2,730
Restaurants £32.4bn – 72,033
Service-Led £20.3bn – 33,348
Fine Dining
£0.8bn – 350
Independent £14.4bn – 28,273
Branded / Casual restaurants
£5.2bn – 4,725
Fast Food
£12.0bn – 38,685
Branded Traditional
£4.0bn – 3,031
Branded Delivery-Focused
£1.3bn – 1,776
Branded Contemporary £0.7bn – 560
Independent inc. take-away
£4.9bn – 25,834
Street Food & Mobile Vans
£1.1bn – 7,483
The largest sector in the Eating Out market. The Hotels, Pubs & Restaurants sector is valued at £62.9bn in 2016, comprising 167,383 outlets. The sector accounts for 72% of turnover in the Eating Out market. Restaurants, including fast food and service-led restaurants, are the largest component, making up 52% of value in the sector.
Note: Hotels are not including in the Restaurant market analysis. Totals are affected by rounding.
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Analysis of growth in UK Restaurant market vs branded restaurantsBranded restaurants outperform wider market but growth slowing down. The Branded restaurant market is forecast to reach an annual turnover growth rate of 4.7% in 2016, compared with 1.1% for the total Restaurant market. Branded contemporary fast food is enjoying the strongest growth in the Eating Out market, and the Managed, branded & franchised pubs segment is expanding on the back of accelerating conversions of Tenanted pubs. However, growth of Branded casual restaurants is expected to slow down, from a turnover growth rate of 6.8% in 2015 to 5.3% in 2016, having an impact on the overall Branded market. Many casual restaurant brands have expanded very rapidly in recent years, and are now slowing down or in some cases rationalising their estates, indicating the ‘space race’ of the last few years has peaked.
MARKET
Comparative analysis of growth in outlets and turnover across the UK Restaurant market and branded restaurant market, 2012-2016E
16
-1.5%
-0.8 -0.7%-0.4%
-0.8%
3.3%
2.6%
3.2%
3.8%
3.3%
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016E
UK Restaurant market Branded restaurant market
Outlets Turnover
0.1% 0.2% 0.6%
1.4%1.1%
4.5%
3.9%
4.5%
5.5%
4.7%
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016E
UK Restaurant market Branded restaurant market
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Analysis of growth in Eating Out marketMarket growth rate to slow down in 2016. After years of incremental growth, turnover growth in the Eating Out market is slowing down from 2.5% to 2.2% in 2016. The market is being hit by weakening business and to an extent, consumer confidence. The Eating Out market is outperforming the total Restaurant market, which is seeing turnover growth of 1.1% and outlet growth of -0.8% in 2016. However, the Branded restaurant market is experiencing considerably stronger growth, at rates of 4.7% and 3.3%, for turnover and outlets respectively.
MARKET
Comparative analysis of growth in outlets and turnover across the total Eating Out market, 2009-2016E
17
0.1%-0.1%
0.3%0.4%
1.0%0.9%
1.0%0.8%
-1.1%
-0.3%
0.9%
1.4%1.6%
1.9%
2.5%
2.2%
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016E
Outlet growth Turnover growth
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Market growth matrix, 2013-2016E
MARKET
18
INTERNAL EXTERNAL
HIGH IMPORTANCE
LOW IMPORTANCE
MCA has identified the following sources of growth in the current market. Internal factors are ones which operators can control internally. External factors are outside the control of operators, and are shaped by the economy, by technological developments and by changing consumer preferences.
PHYSICALEXPANSION
DISCOUNTS & PROMOTIONS
MARKETING INITIATIVES
LONGER TRADING HOURS
PREMIUMISATION HYBRIDISATIONNEW TRADING FORMATS
PACE OF NPD SOCIAL MEDIA
INFLATION
TOURISM & STAYCATIONS
EXPERIENTIAL SHARE OF SPEND
FOODIE CULTURE
DELIVERY
TRADING-UP
POPULATION GROWTH
ALTERNATIVE FUNDING SOURCES
EARLY CAPTURE OF DIGITAL NATIVES
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Share of UK total Restaurant market by segmentFast food gaining share in Restaurant market. Fast food accounts for 22.4% of total value in Restaurant market, up 1.2pp year-on-year. The low-ticket segment’s share of outlets is also up 1.9pp to 32.4%. This growth is coming at the expense of pubs in particular, and to a lesser extent, service-led restaurants. Pubs are still the largest segment, claiming c.40% of both outlets and turnover. Service-led restaurants are dragged down by independent restaurants, set to see net closures in 2016, but also to an extent by the slowing growth of branded restaurants.
MARKET
Share of total Restaurant market outlets and turnover, with year-on-year changes, Dec 15-Dec 16E
19
Market sector UK Restaurant market Pubs Service-led restaurants Fast food outlets
Outlets
Total no. of outlets – Dec 16E 119,491 47,458 33,348 38,685
Annual growth Dec 15-Dec 16E -0.8% -2.9% -1.0% 2.2%
Share of UK Restaurant market 100% 39.7% 27.9% 32.4%
Turnover
Total turnover – 2016E £53,853 £21,469 £20,337 £12,048
Annual growth 2015-2016E 1.1% 0.7% -0.2% 4.3%
Share of UK Restaurant market 100% 39.9% 37.8% 22.4%
-1.7pp -0.2pp +1.9pp
-0.9pp -0.3pp +1.2pp
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
3,060 2,901 2,730 8,100 8,688 9,318
18,757 17,345 17,900
24,780 22,370 17,510
4,555 5,832
7,483
244 350 560
25,162 25,475 25,834
1,179 1,475 1,776
2,571 2,770 3,031
32,825 29,987 28,273
251 296
350
3,920 4,249 4,725
2010 2013 2016E
Branded service-led restaurants
Fine dining
Independent restaurants
Branded traditional fast food
Branded delivery-focused fastfood
Independent fast food/take-away
Branded contemporary fast food
Street food & Mobile vans
Tenanted & leased pubs
Independent & Free of tie pubs
Managed, branded & franchisedpubs
Social clubs
UK Restaurant market – outlets, 2010-216ESlowdown in net closures. The CAGR of the Total Restaurant market for 2013-2016 is -0.6%, up from -1.0% between 2010-2013. The market continues to experience a net closure of outlets, driven by Tenanted & leased pubs and Independent restaurants in particular. Yet the rate of closures has slowed down, with Branded casual restaurants and Branded fast food having accelerated their physical expansion over the last three years. Operators have been racing to secure sites before their competitors do, but slowing growth at several leading operators this year suggests this pace may have been too high for some.
MARKET
Total outlets of UK Restaurant market by segment, 2010, 2013 & 2016E
20
CAGR 2010-2013 CAGR 2013-2016E
-1.0% -0.6%
2.7% 3.6%
5.7% 5.6%
-3.0% -1.9%
2.5% 3.1%
7.8% 6.4%
0.4% 0.5%
12.8% 17.0%
8.6% 8.7%
-3.4% -7.8%
-2.6% 1.1%
2.4% 2.4%
-2.1% -2.6%
Total Restaurant market125,403
121,738 119,491
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
£184 £174 £164
£8,141 £8,992 £9,932
£7,690 £7,059 £7,213
£5,699 £5,145 £4,177£488 £723 £1,094£259 £393 £702
£4,800 £4,857 £4,942£713 £936 £1,275£3,121 £3,652
£4,035
£16,775 £15,292£14,410
£512 £649 £777£3,712 £4,308
£5,150
2010 2013 2016E
Branded service-ledrestaurants
Fine dining
Independent restaurants
Branded traditional fast food
Branded delivery-focused fastfood
Independent fast food/take-away
Branded contemporary fastfood
Street food & Mobile vans
Tenanted & leased pubs
Independent & Free of tie pubs
Managed, branded &franchised pubs
Social clubs
UK Restaurant market – turnover, 2010-216EStrong growth for contemporary fast food, delivery-focused fast food and street food. The three lower-ticket segments have all seen double-digit growth on average between 2013-2016. The fastest turnover growth has been seen at Branded contemporary fast food, an impressive annual average rate of 21%. Concepts such as Leon and Itsu have tapped into the growing demand for healthier and more adventurous products at affordable prices, and Five Guys has expanded at an astronomical rate. Delivery-focused fast food brands, not least Domino’s, have benefitted from the growing demand for convenience and from longer working hours.
MARKET
Total turnover of UK Restaurant market by segment, 2010, 2013 & 2016E
21
CAGR 2010-2013 CAGR 2013-2016E
0.1% 1.1%
5.1% 6.1%
8.2% 6.2%
-3.0% -2.0%
5.4% 3.4%
9.5% 10.8%
0.4% 0.6%
14.9% 21.3%
14.0% 14.8%
-3.4% -6.7%
-2.8% 0.6%
3.4% 3.4%
-0.5% 0.3%
Total Restaurant market
£52,094 £52,182£53,853
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Share of branded restaurants within market segmentsBrands winning share across all segments. Branded segments account for 16.2% of outlets and 39.2% of turnover in the total Restaurant market, up from 15.5% and 36.9%, respectively. Managed, branded & franchised pubs in particular have increased their share of the Pub market, driven primarily by accelerating conversions of tenanted pubs. Branded segments continue to achieve considerably higher sales per store across segments, on the back of greater economic resources of parent companies, better capabilities for attracting investment, and consequently, greater access to higher-footfall sites.
MARKET
Share of branded restaurants within market segments, 2016E, with year-on-year changes
22
Market segment2016E outlet
numbers2016E annual turnover £m
Service-led restaurants
Independents 28,273 £14,410
Fine dining 350 £777
Branded service-led 4,725 £5,150
Total 33,348 £20,337
Branded share of segment 14.2% 25.3%
Pubs
Tenanted/leased 17,510 £4,177
Independents/free of tie 17,900 £7,196
Branded/managed/franchised 9,318 £9,932
Social clubs 2,730 £164
Total 47,458 £21,469
Branded share of segment 19.6% 46.3%
Market segment2016E outlet
numbers2016E annual turnover £m
Fast food
Independents 25,834 £4,942
Street food & mobile vans 7,483 £1,094
Branded traditional fast food 3,031 £4,035
Branded delivery-focused fast food 1,776 £1,275
Branded contemporary fast food 560 £702
Total 38,685 £12,048
Branded share of segment 13.9% 49.9%
Total Restaurant market
Independents/Non-branded/Non-managed
100,081 £32,759
Branded/Managed 19,410 £21,094
Total 119,491 £53,853
Branded share 16.2% 39.2%
+0.6pp +1.3pp
+1.4pp +2.7pp
+0.4pp +2.4pp
+0.7pp +2.3pp
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Service-led restaurant market landscapeService-led restaurant market valued at £20.3bn in 2016. Service-led restaurants, which comprise branded, independent and fine dining restaurants with table service or at the very least semi-counter service, are estimated to reach a value of £20.3bn in 2016, comprising 33,348 outlets. Independent restaurants remain the largest segment in the market, despite ongoing closures, and account for 85% of all outlets and 71% of sales.
MARKET
23
Service-led Restaurant market 2016E:£20.3bn – 33,348
Branded restaurants£5.2bn – 4,725
Independent restaurants
£14.4bn – 28,273
Fine dining£0.8bn – 350
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Analysis of growth in Service-led restaurant marketGrowth slowing down for Branded service-led restaurants, but still outpacing wider market. Turnover growth for Branded casual restaurants is set to decrease from 6.8% in 2015 to 5.3% in 2016. A number of established players – not least Frankie & Benny’s, Giraffe and La Tasca – are rationalising their estates this year. Competition in the market is tighter than ever, and established brands need to refresh their offers to meet contemporary demands. Macroeconomic factors around weakening business confidence are also contributing to operators scaling back expansion plans, as is the increasing difficulty of securing sites. Yet growth in the branded segment is still among the strongest in the Eating Out market, fuelled by a sizeable group of rapidly expanding, newer players.
MARKET
Comparative analysis of growth in outlets and turnover in the service-led restaurant market, 2012-2016E
24
-2.9%
-1.7% -1.6%
-0.7%-1.1%
-0.7% -0.6%-0.3%
1.0%
-0.2%
1.4%
3.4%3.8% 4.0%
2.9%3.4%
5.2%
6.3%6.8%
5.3%
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016E
Total service-led outlet growth Total service-led turnover growth
Branded service-led outlet growth Branded service-led turnover growth
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
251 296 350
32,825 29,987 28,273
3,920
4,249 4,725
2010 2013 2016E
Branded restaurants
Independentrestaurants
Fine dining
Service-led restaurant market – outletsNet closures to continue, but at a slowing pace. The rate of outlet closures at service-led restaurants has slowed down from a CAGR of -2.3% between 2010-2013 to a CAGR of -1.2% between 2013-2016. The expansion of Branded restaurants accelerated between 2013-2016, as brands aggressively set out to secure sites before their competitors did. The rate of closures at independent restaurants, fuelled by a growing consumer preference for brands and a chef shortage affecting many ethnic restaurants in particular, has also slowed down in recent years, but continues to drag down the wider restaurant market.
MARKET
Analysis of growth in outlets across the service-led restaurant market, 2010-2016E
25
34,532
36,996
33,348
SegmentCAGR
2010-2013CAGR
2013-2016E
Total Service-led restaurants
-2.3% -1.2%
Branded restaurants 2.7% 3.6%
Independent restaurants -3.0% -1.9%
Fine dining 5.7% 5.6%
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
£512 £649 £777
£16,775£15,292 £14,410
£3,712£4,308 £5,150
2010 2013 2016E
Branded restaurants
Independentrestaurants
Fine dining
Service-led restaurant market – turnoverVery modest positive sales growth emerging, driven by branded restaurants. The CAGR for turnover growth in the Service-led restaurants market is 0.1% between 2013-2016E, up from -1.2% between 2010-2013E. The strong turnover growth at Branded restaurants, estimated at a CAGR of 6.1% for 2013-2016E, has been fuelled primarily by rapid physical expansion, but also rising consumer numbers and visit frequencies driving like-for-like growth.
MARKET
Analysis of growth in turnover across the service-led restaurant market, 2010-2016E
26
SegmentCAGR
2010-2013CAGR
2013-2016E
Total Service-led restaurants
-1.2% 0.1%
Branded restaurants 5.1% 6.1%
Independent restaurants -3.0% -2.0%
Fine dining 8.2% 6.2%
£20,249£20,999
£20,337
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Analysis of service-led restaurant market by segment, 2016EIndependents losing share to branded restaurants. Independent restaurants remain the mainstay of the service-led market, accounting for 85% of outlets and 71% of sales, but they are losing share in both. Branded operators now account for over a quarter of turnover in the market. Chain restaurants typically have access to better sites and higher sales per store. Fine dining, defined as either Michelin-starred or AA Rosette awarded, is a minor part of the market.
MARKET
Share of service-led restaurant market outlets and turnover by segment, 2016E
27
Market segment2016E outlet
numbersShare of service-led restaurant market
2016E annual turnover £m
Share of service-led restaurant market
Service-led restaurant market 33,348 100% £20,337 100%
Branded restaurants 4,725 14.2% £5,150 25.3%
Independent restaurants 28,273 84.8% £14,410 70.9%
Fine dining 350 1.0% £777 3.8%
+0.6pp +1.3pp
+0.1pp
-0.6pp -1.5pp
+0.0pp
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Analysis of annual outlet growth by cuisine, 2016ELatin/South American cuisine seeing strongest growth. Branded concepts serving food from Latin/South America are expected to see outlet growth of 35% in 2016, reaching a total of 135 outlets. The formidable growth in this segment is spearheaded by Rodizio Preto, expected to double in outlets to 10, CAU, set to grow by 57% to 22 outlets, and Turtle Bay, expected to expand by 48% to 37 outlets. However, Latin American food is still only expected to account for 2.8% of the Branded casual restaurant market. Strong growth is also forecast for South East Asian (22%) and Burgers (20%). Pizza/pasta is the largest cuisine segment by outlets, holding a 30% share.
MARKET
28
Cuisine segment2016E outletgrowth rate
Number of outlets, December 2016EShare of Branded
service-led restaurant market outlets, 2016E
American (excluding fast food) 5.0% 472 10.0%
Asian (excluding Japanese or South East Asian) 8.8% 37 0.8%
British 9.4% 210 4.4%
Burger 19.9% 217 4.6%
Chicken 11.3% 384 8.1%
French 4.2% 221 4.7%
Italian 1.6% 261 5.5%
Japanese 6.0% 228 4.8%
Latin/South American 35.0% 135 2.9%
Mexican (excluding burrito fast food chains) 2.8% 145 3.1%
Pizza/Pasta 7.9% 1,457 30.1%
South East Asian 22.3% 126 2.7%
Steak house 18.9% 88 1.9%
Others -21.3% 744 15.2%
TOTAL 2.9% 4,725 100%
Annual outlet growth of branded service-led restaurants by leading cuisine, with share of outlets of branded service-led market, 2016E
+0.06pp
+0.04pp
+0.23pp
+0.62pp
+0.55pp
+0.03pp
-0.05pp
+0.11pp
+0.67pp
-0.02pp
+1.14pp
+0.50pp
+0.34pp
-4.21pp
Note: Outlet counts for segments listed above only include brands with 5 or more outlets. The ‘Others’ segment includes smaller brands as well (2 or more outlets).
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016 29
Introduction and background
Executive summary
Market
Competitive landscape
Section summary
Financial performance and outlet growth
Key performance indicators
Profiles of the top 20 restaurant brands
Competitive landscape
Consumer insight
Consumer typology analysis
Bespoke consumer research
Future outlook
Contents
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Competitive landscape – Section summaryLower ticket brands top the restaurant market.
• McDonald’s is the leading brand by sales, with turnover expected to reach £2.1 billion in 2016, attributed to ongoing expansion and refurbishments, including rolling out table service to selected stores. Wetherspoon and KFC follow in turnover, with £1.4 and £1.0 billion estimated for 2016, respectively. Growth at Wetherspoon is set to slow this year, with the brand recently putting 90 pubs on the market.
• In casual restaurants, Nando’s continues its winning streak, expected to overtake Burger King in turnover and forecast to reach £579 million in 2016. The brand continues to have widespread appeal amongst consumers.
• Fault lines are opening up in bigger brands, with the Top 10 brands by turnover all set to lose market share this year, aside from Nando’s.
Emerging brands showing strongest growth.
• Brands with less than 100 outlets are set to grow turnover and outlets by 9.7% and 7.8% on average, respectively, compared with an average of 5.8% and 3.5% for all leading brands in the market. In contrast, brands with over 200 outlets are in line to grow by 4.2% and 2.0% for turnover and outlets, respectively. This is resulting in growing dynamism in the Restaurant market, with a number of newer brands expanding rapidly while the establishment is slowing down.
• Brands appealing to millennial consumers by offering ethnic cuisine or specialisation are seeing the most robust growth. Latin/South American themed brand, Turtle Bay, is set to see 66% sales growth to £42 million, and pizza brand, Franco Manca, is expected to grow by 50% to 27 outlets.
Contemporary fast food is teaching traditional new tricks.
• Contemporary fast food brands Itsu, Five Guys, Leon and Wasabi are all gaining market share in outlets through rapid physical expansion. In contrast, McDonald’s, KFC, Burger King and Wimpy are losing share.
• Five Guys is set to see the highest percentage sales growth of any restaurant brand, of 67% to £70 million in 2016, led by strong outlet growth of 50% to 60 outlets. The contemporary fast food brand is on track to increase turnover market share from 1.0% to 1.5% this year in the fast food segment.
COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
Côte, Cosmo and Five Guys outperform in KPIs.
• Eating Out Panel data shows customers rate Côte and Cosmo highly among restaurant brands, with the brands achieving the highest NPS scores. Cosmo’s Pan-Asian cuisine and extensive menu appeal to a wide demographic. Côte, known for its French bistro style, offers all-day service, a key growth area.
• Among fast food brands, Five Guys tops the KPI charts for overall experience. The brand appeals to an extensive customer base with its mid-market prices and high food quality perceptions.
• In pub brands, O’Neill’s preforms well, attaining top position for overall experience and food quality. Sizzling Pubs, the family-friendly pub chain, scores 8.8 in value for money, ranking highest among pub brands.
Premium growing at the expense of value in pubs.
• The Branded pub market is experiencing a shift away from the heavy value focus seen in previous years, to more premium pubs. Greene King has identified Chef & Brewer as a growth brand, and is converting Fayre & Square outlets to the format. M&B is converting Crown Carveries pubs into its new, more premium Sizzling Pubs format, Stonehouse Pizza & Carvery.
• Net closures are expected for value-led Wetherspoon and low-mid market Harvester. In contrast, premium brand, Vintage Inns, makes the list of Top 10 fastest growing restaurant brands with 100-200 outlets. Similarly, Miller & Carter ranks eighth for outlet grow among restaurant brands with less than 100 sites.
Dynamism and premiumisation key growth trends for next few years.
• The Restaurant market competitive landscape is marked by three key current trends: fault lines emerging in the establishment, growing dynamism from small brands expanding rapidly, and a shift from value to premium in the pub and, to an extent, fast food space.
• MCA expects these trends to accelerate over the next few years, resulting in a more fragmented, more competitive and, ultimately, more diverse marketplace, where physical expansion will increasingly involve brands growing at the expense of each other, rather than alongside each other.
30
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016 31
Introduction and background
Executive summary
Market
Competitive landscape
Section summary
Financial performance and outlet growth
Key performance indicators
Profiles of the top 20 restaurant brands
Competitive landscape
Consumer insight
Consumer typology analysis
Bespoke consumer research
Future outlook
Contents
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Turnover – Top 10 fast food, pub and restaurant companies
COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
Positive growth seen across the Top 10 groups. All leading groups, with the exception of Marston’s and Enterprise Inns, are seeing turnover growth year on year. McDonald’s is the leading restaurant company in the UK by sales, with 2016 turnover expected to reach £2.12bn, up from £2.09bn in 2015. Greene King will see the strongest growth among the Top 10 groups over 2016, of £1,072m, primarily due to the acquisition of Spirit Pub Company.
Top 10 fast food, pub and restaurant groups by turnover, £m, 2012-2016E
32
McDonald'sMitchells &
ButlersGreene King Wetherspoon YUM! Brands
TheRestaurant
GroupMarston's
EnterpriseInns
Nando's Stonegate
FY 2012 £1,944 £1,889 £803 £1,197 £1,179 £533 £605 £711 £374 £484
FY 2013 £1,967 £1,895 £864 £1,281 £1,201 £580 £656 £692 £431 £470
FY2014 £2,026 £1,970 £963 £1,409 £1,233 £635 £655 £639 £470 £557
FY 2015 £2,085 £2,101 £1,001 £1,514 £1,259 £685 £676 £632 £523 £562
FY 2016E £2,116 £2,106 £2,073 £1,595 £1,287 £696 £658 £625 £579 £579
Note: Turnover is reported total group turnover to financial year, and estimated where 2016 results are not yet available. YUM! Is an estimate based on combined turnover of its individual brands.
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Turnover – Top 10 brandsTraditional fast food brands lead in top five. McDonald’s, KFC and Burger King all feature in the Top five brands by turnover, with Wetherspoon representing the leading pub brand. Growth is slowing down at Wetherspoon, which has put a total of 90 pubs on the market in the last 12 months. Chicken brand Nando’s is set to overtake Burger King in turnover in 2016. All the leading brands are forecast to enjoy net turnover growth in 2016.
COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
Top 10 fast food, pub and restaurant brands by turnover, £m, 2012-2016E
33
McDonald's Wetherspoon KFC Nando's Burger King PizzaExpress HarvesterFrankie &Benny's
Hungry HorsePizza Hut
Restaurants
2012 £1,944 £1,017 £910 £374 £464 £362 £281 £243 £185 £251
2013 £1,967 £1,080 £924 £431 £471 £369 £307 £273 £229 £230
2014 £2,026 £1,199 £931 £470 £533 £380 £322 £291 £252 £225
2015 £2,085 £1,413 £964 £523 £544 £407 £324 £317 £276 £225
2016E £2,116 £1,426 £994 £579 £576 £427 £329 £318 £299 £235
Note: Turnovers are annualised estimates based on average weekly sales.
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
£2,116 £1,426 £994 £579 £566 £427 £329 £325 £299 £235
10.1%
6.8%
4.7%
2.8% 2.7%2.0%
1.6% 1.5% 1.4% 1.1%
McDonald's Wetherspoon KFC Nando's Burger King PizzaExpress Harvester Frankie &Benny's
Hungry Horse Pizza HutRestaurants
Turnover 2016E Percentage market share & Movement YoY
↔0.0pp
Market share – Top 10 brands
Top 10 brands make up 35% of the branded restaurant market. McDonald's leads with a turnover of over £2.1 billion making up 10.1% of the branded market, down from 10.4% in 2015. Nando’s, forecast to grow to 375 outlets in December 2016, holds an impressive 2.8% market share compared to 452-outlet PizzaExpress’s 2.0% share. Nando’s is the only leading brand in the Top 10 expected to see market share growth, highlighting the growing dynamism and fragmentation in the market.
Top 10 fast food, pub and restaurant brands by turnover, £m, with total branded restaurant market share shown in percentages, 2016E
34
Notes: Turnover figures estimated for calendar year. Branded restaurant market includes fast food, pub and restaurant brands.
↓0.3pp
↓0.4pp
↓0.1pp↔0.0pp
↑0.2pp
↓0.1pp
↔0.0pp
↔0.0pp
↔0.0pp
COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Operating margin – Top 10 groupsHigher operating margins at pub groups. Young’s and Whitbread have achieved consistently high operating margins, above 20% every year since 2011. Young’s recorded an impressive operating margin of 24% in its FY 2016, the highest among surveyed groups, driven by positive like-for-like sales and cost management. The Restaurant Group has achieved the highest operating margin for restaurant companies for the past four years, but this has decreased to 10.5% in H1 2016 due to operational difficulties and decreasing like-for-likes.
Operating margins of leading pub and restaurant companies, 2011-2015
35
Notes: Pub group operating margins are based on the following: M&B – total group revenue; JD Wetherspoon – sales of food, beverages, hotel rooms, and machine income; Young’s – sales of drink, food and accommodation for managed pubs; Greene King – retail; Whitbread – hotel and restaurant division. Only companies with official figures available were considered. Figures are to financial year. *Note: Azzurri Group was Gondola Group prior to 2015.
Whitbread Young's Greene KingMitchells &
Butlers
TheRestaurant
GroupFuller's Prezzo Group
AzzurriGroup*
Wetherspoon Stonegate
FY 2011 24% 23% 19% 16% 13% 11% 13% 8% 10% 0%
FY 2012 24% 21% 19% 16% 13% 12% 13% 7% 9% 5%
FY 2013 23% 22% 19% 17% 13% 11% 12% 5% 9% 4%
FY 2014 23% 22% 20% 16% 13% 11% 12% 8% 8% 4%
FY 2015 24% 23% 19% 16% 13% 11% 11% 9% 7% 6%
FY 2016 23% 24% 19% 11% 7%N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Operating margins of leading pub and restaurant companies, 2011-2016
COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Sales growth – Top 10 brands with over 200 outlets, 2015-2016ENando’s leading sales growth. The five brands expected to see the strongest growth in 2016 in absolute terms are all value-led, including Nando’s, leading ahead of fast food giants, McDonald’s and KFC. Nando’s is expected to see impressive percentage growth of 10.7% and absolute growth of £55.8 million. Sizzling Pubs is set to see the second highest percentage turnover growth of 9.4%, benefitting from conversions of Crown Carveries sites.
COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
Top 10 brands with over 200 outlets ranked by UK sales growth in absolute terms with percentage growth rates, 2015-2016E
36
Brand Nando's McDonald's KFC Hungry Horse Sizzling Pubs Burger King PizzaExpress Prezzo WetherspoonPizza Hut
RestaurantsTurnover growth
10.7% 2.7% 3.1% 8.1% 9.4% 4.0% 4.9% 8.3% 0.9% 1.8%
Outlet growth 10.0% 1.6% 2.2% 8.2% 8.7% 1.6% 2.3% 7.8% -2.0% 1.8%
Crude like-for-like
0.7% 1.1% 0.9% -0.1% 0.7% 2.4% 2.6% 0.5% 2.9% 0.0%
£55.8 £55.1
£30.3
£22.5 £22.5 £21.8 £20.1£14.9 £12.8
£9.8
10.7%
2.7% 3.1%
8.1%
9.4%
4.0% 4.9%
8.3%
0.9%
1.8%
Nando's McDonald's KFC Hungry Horse Sizzling Pubs Burger King PizzaExpress Prezzo Wetherspoon Pizza HutRestaurants
Absolute growth Percentage growth
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Sales growth – Top 10 brands with 100-200 outlets, 2015-2016EBella Italia ranks highest. Bella Italia is expected to see turnover percentage growth of 34%, on the back of 22 new openings predominantly in retail parks. Flaming Grill Pubs is seeing to a see high crude like-for-like score, 5.3%, and is third highest for absolute turnover growth of £9.4 million.
COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
Top 10 brands with 100-200 outlets ranked by UK sales growth in absolute terms with percentage growth rates, 2015-2016E
37
Bella Italia Wagamama Flaming Grill Toby Carvery Beefeater Carluccio’s ZizziBrewers
FayreChef & Brewer
Vintage Inns
Turnover growth
33.6% 10.5% 7.4% 3.6% 4.5% 6.8% 5.3% 3.5% 4.0% 2.5%
Outlet growth 22.9% 5.1% 2.1% 0.0% 5.6% 6.1% 5.8% 3.1% 3.7% 3.1%
Crude like-for-like
10.7% 5.4% 5.3% 3.6% -1.1% 0.7% -0.5% 0.4% 0.3% -0.6%
£28.8
£18.2
£9.4 £9.3 £9.2 £8.8 £7.7 £7.6 £7.2 £6.0
33.6%
10.5%7.4%
3.6% 4.5%
6.8%
5.3%3.5% 4.0%
2.5%
Bella Italia Wagamama Flaming Grill Toby Carvery Beefeater Carluccio's Zizzi BrewersFayre
Chef &Brewer
Vintage Inns
Absolute growth Percentage growth
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Sales growth – Top 10 brands with under 100 outlets, 2015-2016EFive Guys leading sales growth for smaller brands. Five Guys is set to see impressive percentage turnover growth of 67% in 2016 to £70.2 million. The brand continues to expand rapidly throughout the UK. Miller & Carter’s turnover is expected to increase by 27% to £14.2mn, driven by conversions of Harvester units.
COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
Top 10 brands with under 100 outlets ranked by UK sales growth in absolute terms with percentage growth rates, 2015-2016E
38
Five Guys Côte Leon T.G.I. Fridays Turtle BayJamie's Italian
Miller & Carter
Bill’s Loungers Byron
Turnover growth
66.7% 20.1% 54.9% 9.1% 63.2% 12.5% 26.8% 16.5% 27.9% 20.2%
Outlet growth 50.0% 12.3% 48.5% 6.9% 48.0% 9.5% 30.8% 5.6% 16.7% 12.7%
Crude like-for-like
16.7% 7.8% 6.4% 2.2% 15.2% 3.0% -4.0% 10.9% 11.2% 7.5%
£28.1
£22.0
£18.8£17.2 £16.2
£14.2 £14.2 £13.4 £13.0£12.8
66.7%
20.1%
54.9%
9.1%
63.2%
12.5%
26.8%
16.5%
27.9%
20.2%
Five Guys Côte Leon T.G.I. Fridays Turtle Bay Jamie'sItalian
Miller &Carter
Bill's Loungers Byron
Absolute growth Percentage growth
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
3.5%
7.8%
0.9%
2.0%
5.8%
9.7%
4.8%
4.2%
Average <100 100-200 >200
Outlet growth Turnover growth
Sales growth summary, 2015-2016EHighest growth seen in brands with less than 100 outlets. Brands with less than 100 sites are set to grow turnover and outlets by 9.7% and 7.8%, compared with an average of 5.8% and 3.5% for all leading brands in the market. In contrast, brands with over 200 outlets are in line to grow by 4.2% and 2.0% for turnover and outlets, respectively, this year.
COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
Average outlet and sales growth for brands by outlet count, turnover in billions, 2015-2016E
39
<100 100-200 >200
Total brands 109 13 12
Total outlets 3,250 1,838 5,974
Total turnover £3,992 £2,231 £7,853
Note: Brand performance is focused on MCA’s Brands & Corporates database of 110 leading operators, with inclusion requiring a minimum of 5 outlets and a distinct, single brand consistency
AVG TURNOVER GROWTH
AVG OUTLET GROWTH
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016 40
27.9% 27.6% 27.4%
16.6% 17.4% 17.1%
5.9% 6.4% 6.9%2.5% 2.7% 3.0%1.4% 1.5% 1.5%
2014 2015 2016E
Top 10 Next 25 Next 25 Next 25 Bottom 25
Turnover market share Outlet market share
Fast food, pub and restaurant brands by market share, 2014-2016E
Market share of leading restaurant brands by outlets
Note: Brand performance is focused on MCA’s Brands & Corporates database of 110 leading operators, with inclusion requiring a minimum of 5 outlets and a distinct, single brand consistency.
Top 10 Next 25 Next 25 Next 25 Bottom 25
Outlet numbers 250+ 77-249 35-76 16-34 5-15
Brand examples
35.3% 34.6% 32.4%
16.9% 17.6%17.5%
6.0% 7.3%7.9%
2.6% 2.9% 3.1%1.6% 1.8% 2.0%
2014 2015 2016E
Top 10 Next 25 Next 25 Next 25 Bottom 25
COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
Top 10 brands losing market share. The Top 10 brands by outlets are seeing continued decrease in both turnover and outlet market share. Brands with 35-77 outlets are seeing highest increase in turnover and outlet market share. The smaller groups are both also set to increase their share of sales and outlets in the total market this year, highlighting growing dynamism in the Restaurant market.
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Percentage sales growth – Top 10 brands, 2015-2016E• Five brands seeing turnover growth of over 50%. The fastest growing brands – CAU, Five Guys, Franco Manca, Turtle Bay and Leon – are examples of
brands offering a contemporary experience through specialisation in a product, adventurous cuisine or healthier eating focus. Service, environments and atmosphere are equally important to capture the minds of contemporary consumers.
COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
Top 10 fastest growing brands ranked by percentage growth rates with UK sales growth in absolute terms, 2015-2016E
41
£8.2 £28.1 £6.2 £16.1 £19.0 £7.2 £7.6 £2.6 £3.2 £8.4
67% 67%64% 63%
55%
48%45%
42% 41%38%
CAU Five Guys Franco Manca Turtle Bay Leon Cosy Club Coast To Coast Koh ThaiTapas
Barburrito MEATliquor
Absolute Growth Percentage Growth
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Outlets – Top 20 restaurant, fast food and pub brands by outlets Fast food brands and Wetherspoon stand out. McDonald’s has the highest number of outlets and is set to experience continued strong expansion over 2016. Chicken giant Nando’s is set to see the highest percentage growth of 10%, on the back of 34 net new openings.
COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
Top 20 fast food, pub and restaurant brands by outlets, December 2015-December 2016E
42
Brand Segment Outlets Dec-15 Outlets Dec-16E Net New openings % growth
McDonald's Traditional fast food 1,277 1,297 20 1.6%
KFC Traditional fast food 832 850 18 2.2%
Wetherspoon Pub restaurant 789 773 -16 -2.0%
Burger King Traditional fast food 502 518 16 3.2%
PizzaExpress Casual restaurant 442 452 10 2.3%
Nando's Casual restaurant 341 375 34 10.0%
Pizza Hut Restaurants Casual restaurant 280 285 5 1.8%
Frankie & Benny's Casual restaurant 253 252 -1 -0.4%
Hungry Horse Pub restaurant 245 265 20 8.2%
Harvester Pub restaurant 231 220 -11 -4.8%
Sizzling Pubs Pub restaurant 230 250 20 8.7%
Prezzo Casual restaurant 230 248 18 7.8%
Vintage Inns Pub restaurant 191 197 6 3.1%
Toby Carvery Pub restaurant 173 173 0 0.0%
Fayre & Square Pub restaurant 164 114 -50 -30.5%
Brewers Fayre Pub restaurant 161 166 5 3.1%
Two for One Pub restaurant 150 142 -8 -5.3%
Flaming Grill Pubs Pub restaurant 142 145 3 2.1%
Beefeater Pub restaurant 142 150 8 5.6%
Zizzi Casual restaurant 139 147 8 5.7%
Sub-total 6,914 7,019 105 1.5%
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Outlet growth – Top 20 brands Dec 2015-Dec 2016ENando’s leads in outlet growth, followed by Bella Italia and Hungry Horse. Bella Italia is growing on the back of Café Rouge conversions, and also a revitalised offer. Barburrito is seeing the strongest growth, though from a relatively low base.
COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
Top 20 fast food, pub and restaurant brands by forecast net outlet growth, Dec 2015-Dec 2016E, with percentage growth rates
43
34
2220 20 20 20
18 1816
12 12 11 10 9 9 9 9 8 8 810%
23%
8%
50%
2%
9%
2%8%
48%
22%
48%
17%
2%
12%
50%
13%
23%
6%2%
67%
Outlet growth Percentage growth
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Top 20 casual restaurant brands with under 60 outlets, 2015-2016EEmerging brands lead casual restaurants. Turtle Bay, Coast to Coast and Franco Manca are among newer brands set to see strong outlet growth. Both Turtle Bay and Coast to Coast have well-developed cocktail menus alongside their food offers. La Tasca and Strada are undergoing estate rationalisation.
COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
Top 20 casual restaurant brands under 60 outlets, ranked by outlets with turnover, 2015-2016E
44
Brand:Outlets Dec-
15Outlets Dec-16E
Year on Year % growth
Turnover FY 2015 (m)
Turnover FY 2016E (m)
Year on year % growth
Ed's Easy Diner 58 61 5.2% £50.2 £52.9 5.4%
Byron 55 67 21.8% £63.5 £76.3 20.2%
Las Iguanas 47 55 17.0% £60.2 £72.0 19.6%
Jamie's Italian 42 46 9.5% £113.8 £128.0 12.5%
Strada 42 32 -23.8% £48.6 £40.8 -16.0%
Loch Fyne 41 37 -9.8% £48.5 £47.1 -2.9%
Harry Ramsden's 39 48 23.1% £19.0 £25.2 32.6%
Chimichanga 38 38 0.0% £45.1 £45.2 0.2%
La Tasca 37 12 -67.6% £22.3 £21.6 -3.1%
Wildwood 31 38 22.6% £22.3 £29.3 31.4%
Le Pain Quotidien 26 27 3.8% £33.8 £34.8 3.0%
Handmade Burger Company 25 25 0.0% £17.4 £18.6 6.9%
Turtle Bay 25 37 48.0% £25.5 £41.6 63.2%
Piccolino 22 22 0.0% £33.1 £34.4 3.9%
Wahaca 21 21 0.0% £37.1 £42.8 15.4%
Brasserie Blanc 19 18 -5.3% £31.9 £30.6 -4.1%
Coast To Coast 18 25 38.9% £17.3 £25.1 45.1%
Cosmo 18 20 11.1% £32.6 £36.8 12.9%
Franco Manca 18 27 50.0% £9.7 £15.9 63.9%
Giggling Squid 16 19 18.8% £10.3 £14.1 36.9%
Sub-total 661 709 7.3% £741.9 £833.9 12.4%
UK Branded casual restaurant market 4,590 4,725 £4,890 £5,150
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016 45
Introduction and background
Executive summary
Market
Competitive landscape
Section summary
Financial performance and outlet growth
Key performance indicators
Profiles of the top 20 restaurant brands
Competitive landscape
Consumer insight
Consumer typology analysis
Bespoke consumer research
Future outlook
Contents
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Top 15 Casual restaurant brands by outlets – market positioning map
COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
46
High Price
Low Price
Narrow Focus Broad focus
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Market share of Top 15 casual restaurant brandsPizzaExpress and Nando’s fight for leadership. PizzaExpress and Nando’s top the charts by outlets, with 452 and 375 respectively, Nando’s leading by turnover, holding an 11.2% market share. At 0.6pp Nando’s has seen the biggest increase in turnover share from 2015, attributed to continued rapid expansion.
COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
Top 15 branded casual restaurants, market share by UK store numbers and turnover, December 2016E
47
Outlets December 2016E Turnover 2016E
Casual Restaurant brand UK Dec 16EShare of Branded casual restaurant
market
Change in % from 2015
Est. Turnover (£m)Share of Branded casual restaurant
market
Change in % from 2015
PizzaExpress 452 9.6% 0.0pp £427 8.3% 0.0pp
Nando's 375 7.9% 0.4pp £579 11.2% 0.6pp
Pizza Hut Restaurants 285 6.0% -0.1pp £235 4.6% 0.0pp
Frankie & Benny's 252 5.3% -0.2pp £318 6.2% -0.3pp
Prezzo 248 5.2% 0.2pp £194 3.8% 0.1pp
Zizzi 147 3.1% 0.1pp £152 3.0% 0.0pp
Wagamama 124 2.6% 0.0pp £189 3.6% 0.1pp
Bella Italia 118 2.5% 0.4pp £115 2.2% 0.5pp
ASK Italian 117 2.5% 0.0pp £93 1.8% 0.0pp
Carluccio's 104 2.2% 0.0pp £140 2.7% 0.0pp
Café Rouge 90 1.9% -0.2pp £103 2.0% -0.3pp
Chiquito 86 1.8% 0.0pp £114 2.2% 0.0pp
Côte 82 1.7% 0.1pp £132 2.6% 0.3pp
Gourmet Burger Kitchen 78 1.6% 0.1pp £64 1.2% 0.1pp
T.G.I. Friday's 77 1.6% 0.0pp £208 4.0% 0.1pp
Sub-total 2,635 55.4% 1.0pp £3,063 59.4% 0.3pp
UK Branded casual restaurant market 4,725 100% £5,150 100%
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Restaurant brands NPS – lunch & dinner, 2016Côte performs well in NPS score. Côte, Cosmo and Loch Fyne top the charts for NPS scores. Loch Fyne and La Tasca receive high NPS scores despite having modest or negative turnover growth, highlighting a loyal core customer base. At the other end of the spectrum are
Harry Ramsden’s, Chiquito and Jamie’s Italian.
COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
Leading restaurant chains ranked by Revisit Intention and NPS, lunch & dinner combined, 2016
48
Source: MCA Eating Out Panel, 12 months to June 2016 & minimum sample size of 30 applies. Note: Sales growth is categorised as turnover percentage growth, less than 5% is low, 5-10% medium and more than 10% is high.
Top 10 Net Promoter Scores 2016 Score Bottom 10 Net Promoter Scores 2016 Score
Côte 62 Harry Ramsden's 0
Cosmo 59 Chiquito 9
Loch Fyne 53 Jamie's Italian 9
La Tasca 42 Giraffe 9
Las Iguanas 41 Gourmet Burger Kitchen 10
Bella Italia 39 Ed's Easy Diner 12
Nando's 38 Bill's 19
Prezzo 36 T.G.I. Friday's 21
Wagamama 36 ASK 24
Carluccio's 35 Handmade Burger Co. 24
Key: High sales growthMedium sales growthLow sales growth
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
KPIs of casual restaurant brands (1 of 2) – lunch & dinner, 2016Among restaurant chains, Cosmo ranks highest. Most notably, Cosmo scores 8.7 for value for money and 9.0 for speed of service. YO! Sushi achieves the highest score for food quality/taste.
COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
KPIs of restaurant brands – lunch & dinner combined, 2016
49
Rank Convenient locationAtmosphere/ environment
Value for money Low Prices Speed of Service Friendly service Food quality/ taste
1 Côte 8.9 Loch Fyne 8.7 Cosmo 8.7 Cosmo 8.5 Cosmo 9.0 Côte 8.8 YO! Sushi 8.9
2 Las Iguanas 8.8 Côte 8.6 Côte 8.2 Las Iguanas 7.5 Las Iguanas 8.6 Las Iguanas 8.8 Côte 8.8
3 Prezzo 8.7 Café Rouge 8.4 Las Iguanas 8.2 Bella Italia 7.5 Wagamama 8.6 La Tasca 8.7 Cosmo 8.8
4 Cosmo 8.7 Las Iguanas 8.4 La Tasca 8.1Pizza Hut Restaurant
7.5 Wasabi 8.3 Bella Italia 8.6 Wagamama 8.8
5 Bella Italia 8.7 Bella Italia 8.4 Loch Fyne 8.1 La Tasca 7.4 Côte 8.1 Wagamama 8.6 La Tasca 8.6
6 ASK 8.6 Zizzi 8.3 Bella Italia 8.1 Nando's 7.4 YO! Sushi 8.1 Zizzi 8.5 Las Iguanas 8.6
7Jamie's Italian
8.6 Cosmo 8.2 Wagamama 7.9 Wasabi 7.3 Prezzo 8.1 Cosmo 8.5 Bella Italia 8.6
8 Chiquito 8.5 Prezzo 8.2 Prezzo 7.9 Prezzo 7.2 Nando's 8.0 Loch Fyne 8.5 Prezzo 8.5
9 Zizzi 8.5Frankie & Benny's
8.2Pizza Hut Restaurant
7.9 ASK 7.2 Bella italia 8.0 Carluccio's 8.5 Loch Fyne 8.5
10 PizzaExpress 8.5 ASK 8.2 Nando's 7.9 PizzaExpress 7.1 La Tasca 8.0 Café Rouge 8.5 Nando's 8.5
Source: MCA Eating Out Panel, 12 months to June 2016. Minimum sample size of 30 applies. KPIs are based on a scale of 1-10 (from very poor to excellent).
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
KPIs of casual restaurant brands (2 of 2) – lunch & dinner, 2016Cosmo ranks highest for overall experience. Cosmo achieves continually high scores across the board, including outperforming other branded restaurants in overall experience. Loch Fyne follows in second place for overall experience and is also ranked first for freshness.
COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
KPIs of restaurant brands – lunch & dinner combined, 2016
50
Rank Drink quality/ taste Freshness Menu Choice CleanlinessEthical practice/
productsFamily friendly Overall experience
1 Cosmo 8.8 Loch Fyne 9 Cosmo 9.3 Côte 8.9 Loch Fyne 7.9 Cosmo 8.8 Cosmo 8.9
2 La Tasca 8.8 Côte 8.8 Wagamama 8.6 Loch Fyne 8.9 Wagamama 7.9Ed's Easy Diner
8.4 Loch Fyne 8.8
3Ed's Easy Diner
8.6 Wagamama 8.7 YO! Sushi 8.5 Cosmo 8.8 Cosmo 7.8Pizza Hut Restaurants
8.4 Côte 8.7
4 Côte 8.6 YO! Sushi 8.7 Bella Italia 8.5 La Tasca 8.7Jamie's Italian
7.8Frankie & benny's
8.4 Las Iguanas 8.5
5 Las Iguanas 8.5 Bella Italia 8.6 Las Iguanas 8.5 Prezzo 8.6 Bella Italian 7.8 Nando's 8.3 Bella Italia 8.5
6 Café Rouge 8.5 Zizzi 8.5 Loch Fyne 8.5 Wagamama 8.6Handmade Burger Co.
7.7 Wagamama 8.2 La Tasca 8.5
7 Bella Italia 8.4 Las Iguanas 8.5 Côte 8.5 Las Iguanas 8.6Ed's Easy Diner
7.6 Bella Italia 8.2 Wagamama 8.5
8 Wagamama 8.4 Cosmo 8.5 La Tasca 8.5 Zizzi 8.5 Nando's 7.6 PizzaExpress 8.1 Prezzo 8.4
9 Prezzo 8.4 Prezzo 8.5 Prezzo 8.4 Bella Italia 8.5 Las Iguanas 7.6T.G.I. Fridays
8.1 Zizzi 8.3
10 Zizzi 8.4Jamie's Italian
8.5 PizzaExpress 8.2 Café Rouge 8.5 YO! Sushi 7.5Jamie's Italian
8.1 Café Rouge 8.3
Source: MCA Eating Out Panel, 12 months to June 2016. Minimum sample size of 30 applies. KPIs are based on a scale of 1-10 (from very poor to excellent).
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
8.8 8.8 8.6 8.6 8.6 8.8 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5
8.7 8.2 8.1 8.2 8.1 7.9 8.1 7.9 7.9 7.7
Cosmo Côte La Tasca Las Iguanas Bella Italia Wagamama Loch Fyne Prezzo Nando's Zizzi
Food quality/taste Value for money
KPI case study – Top 10 restaurant brands, lunch & dinner, 2016
Cosmo achieves the highest combined score. Cosmo achieves the highest combined score for the key metrics of food quality and value for money. Côte and Wagamama achieve the same scores as Cosmo in food quality, but Wagamama underperforms in value for money.
COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
Top 10 restaurant brands, lunch & dinner combined, KPIs of food quality and value for money, ranked combined score, 2016
51
17.5 16.716.8 16.716.717.0 16.416.5 16.216.7
Source: MCA Eating Out Panel, 12 months to June 2016 & minimum sample size of 30 applies
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Top 10 Fast food brands by outlets – market positioning map
COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
52
High Price
Low Price
Traditional Emerging
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Market share of branded fast food chainsTraditional fast food brands losing share. McDonald’s, KFC and Burger King are all expected to see a decrease in both the market share of outlets and turnover. McDonald’s alone is forecast to see a drop of 1.2pp in turnover share. Although contemporary fast food is a rapidly growing segment, it is still a relatively minor player in the total fast food market, with five largest brands making up less than 6% of outlets.
COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
Top 10 branded fast food restaurants, market share by UK store numbers and turnover, December 2016E
53
Outlets December 2016E
Turnover 2016E
Branded Chains Traditional/Cont. Outlets Share of UK Branded fast food market
Change in % from 2015
Turnover (£m)Share of UK Branded fast food market
Change in % from 2015
McDonald's Traditional 1,297 36.1% -1.1pp £2,116 44.7% -1.2pp
KFC Traditional 850 23.7% -0.6pp £1,064 22.5% -0.5pp
Burger King Traditional 518 14.4% -0.2pp £576 12.2% 0.0pp
Wimpy Traditional 86 2.4% -0.2pp £49 1.0% -0.1pp
Itsu Contemporary 73 2.0% 0.1pp £90 1.9% 0.2pp
Five Guys Contemporary 60 1.7% 0.5pp £70 1.5% 0.5pp
Leon Contemporary 49 1.4% 0.4pp £53 1.1% 0.4pp
Wasabi Contemporary 49 1.4% 0.1pp £87 1.8% 0.1pp
Roosters Piri Traditional 35 1.0% -0.1pp £22 0.5% 0.0pp
Tortilla Contemporary 31 0.9% 0.1pp £27 0.6% 0.1pp
Sub-total 3,048 84.9% -1.0pp £4,154 87.7% -0.5pp
UK Branded fast food market (excl. delivery segment)
3,591 100% £4,737 100%
Note: Contemporary fast food is defined as food served quickly at the counter and has healthy or ‘newer’ cuisine focus.
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Fast food NPS – lunch & dinner, 2016Wasabi tops the charts. Out of leading brands, Wasabi holds the highest score for NPS, followed by Five Guys and KFC. The top 2 brands are also set to enjoy strong sales growth of over 10% this year.
COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
Leading fast food chains ranked by revisit intention and NPS, lunch & dinner combined
54
Net Promoter Score 2016 Score
Wasabi 24
Five Guys 15
KFC 15
McDonald's 14
Burger King -1
Key: High sales growthMedium sales growthLow Sales growth
Source: MCA Eating Out Panel, 12 months to June 2016 & minimum sample size of 30 applies. Note: Sales growth is categorised as turnover percentage growth, less than 5% is low, 5-10% medium and more than 10% is high.
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
KPIs of fast food brands (1 of 2) – lunch & dinner, 2016Wasabi ranks highest for food quality. Wasabi achieves the highest scores for speed of service and food quality. McDonald's performs highest in value for money and low prices, with entry menu prices starting at £0.89 for a Hamburger.
COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
KPIs of fast food brands – lunch & dinner combined, 2016
55
Rank Convenient locationAtmosphere/ environment
Value for money Low prices Speed of service Friendly service Food quality/ taste
1 McDonald's 8.4 Five Guys 7.7 McDonald's 8.0 McDonald's 7.8 Wasabi 8.3 Five Guys 8.2 Wasabi 8.3
2 KFC 8.2 Chicken Cottage 7.6 KFC 7.8 Dixy Chicjken 7.7 Five Guys 8.1 McDonald's 7.8 Five Guys 8.2
3 Five Guys 8.2 Dixy Chicken 7.6 Dixy Chicken 7.7Chicken Cottage
7.6 McDonald's 8.0 KFC 7.8 KFC 8.2
4 Burger King 8.1 KFC 7.5 Wasabi 7.7 KFC 7.5 KFC 7.9 Chicken Cottage 7.8 McDonald's 7.9
5 Wasabi 8.1 McDonald's 7.4 Chicken Cottage 7.6 Burger King 7.3 Burger King 7.7 Wasabi 7.7 Burger King 7.8
Source: MCA Eating Out Panel, 12 months to June 2016. Minimum sample size of 30 applies. KPIs are based on a scale of 1-10 (from very poor to excellent).
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
KPIs of fast food brands (2 of 2) – lunch & dinner, 2016
Five Guys ranks highest in overall experience. The fast growing burger brand also outperforms in freshness and cleanliness. McDonald’s achieves the highest rating for menu choice and family friendliness.
COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
KPIs of fast food brands – lunch & dinner combined, 2016
56
Rank Drink quality/ taste Freshness Menu choice CleanlinessEthical practices/
productsFamily friendly Overall experience
1 Five Guys 8.1 Five Guys 8.2 McDonald's 8.0 Five Guys 8.1 Dixy Chicken 7.7 McDonald's 8.0 Five Guys 8.1
2 McDonald's 7.9 KFC 8.0 KFC 8.0 McDonald's 7.8 Chicken Cottage 7.6 Five Guys 7.9 Wasabi 8.0
3 KFC 7.9 Wasabi 8.0 Five Guys 8.0 KFC 7.8 Five Guys 7.6 KFC 7.9 McDonald's 8.0
4 Dixy Chicken 7.8 McDonald's 7.8 Wasabi 7.9 Wasabi 7.7 Wasabi 7.6 Chicken Cottage 7.7 KFC 8.0
5 Burger King 7.7 Burger King 7.7 Burger King 7.7 Dixy Chicken 7.6 KFC 7.3 Burger King 7.7 Chicken Cottage 7.8
Source: MCA Eating Out Panel, 12 months to June 2016. Minimum sample size of 30 applies. KPIs are based on a scale of 1-10 (from very poor to excellent).
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
8.2 8.3 7.9 8.2 7.8
7.8 7.7 8.0 7.5 7.7
KFC Wasabi McDonald's Five Guys Dixy Chicken
Food quality/taste Value for money
KPI Case study – Top 5 fast food brands, lunch & dinner, 2016KFC leads in combined score. KFC achieves the highest score, though this is virtually on par with Wasabi and McDonald’s. Five Guys scores well for food quality but underperforms in value for money.
COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
Leading fast food brands lunch and dinner KPIs of food quality and value for money, ranked by combined score, 2016
57
15.9 15.9 15.715.9 15.5
Source: MCA Eating Out Panel, 12 months to June 2016 & minimum sample size of 30 applies
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Leading pub restaurants – market positioning map
COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
58
High Price
Low Price
Destination FocusLocal Focus
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Market share of pub brandsWetherspoon leads in outlets and turnover. Wetherspoon has the largest estate with 773 outlets (not including Lloyds No. 1 or JJ moons pubs) and a turnover of £1.4 billion, but its turnover share has decreased by 1.5pp year-on-year on the back of pubs being put on the market. Although ranking fourth for outlet numbers, Harvester has the second highest turnover of £329 million.
COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
Top 10 pub brands, market share by UK pub numbers and turnover, December 2016E
59
Outlets December 2016E Turnover 2016E
Pub Brands UK Dec 16E Share of UK Pub marketChange in % from 2015
Est. Turnover (£m) Share of UK Pub marketChange in % from 2015
Wetherspoon 773 8.3% -0.8pp £1,426 14.4% -1.5pp
Hungry Horse 265 2.8% 0.1pp £299 3.0% 0.1pp
Sizzling Pubs 250 2.7% 0.1pp £262 2.6% 0.1pp
Harvester 220 2.4% -0.2pp £329 3.3% -0.1pp
Vintage Inns 197 2.1% 0.0pp £242 2.4% 0.0pp
Toby Carvery 173 1.9% -0.1pp £269 2.7% 0.0pp
Brewers Fayre 166 1.8% 0.0pp £222 2.2% 0.0pp
Beefeater 150 1.6% 0.0pp £211 2.1% 0.0pp
Flaming Grill Pubs 145 1.6% 0.0pp £139 1.4% 0.1pp
Two for One 142 1.5% -0.1pp £142 1.4% 0.0pp
Subtotal 2,481 26.6% -0.9pp £3,541 35.7% -1.3ppManaged, branded & franchised pub market 9,318 100% £9,932 100%
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Pub NPS – lunch & dinner, 2016Eating Inn performs well. Eating Inn attains the highest NPS score of 51, followed by Miller & Carter, 49, and Sizzling Pubs, 48. The bottom 10 NPS scores are almost exclusively made up of low or medium sales growth brands.
COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
Leading pub chains revisit intention and NPS, lunch & dinner, 2016
60
Net Promoter Score top 10 2016 Score Net Promoter Score bottom 10 2016 Score
Eating Inn 51 Fuller's 6
Miller & Carter 49 Chef & Brewer 17
Sizzling Pubs 48 Beefeater 22
Toby Carvery 47 Fayre & Square 23
Crown Carveries 46 Yates's 23
O'Neill's 43 Ember Inns 23
Table 41 All Bar One 26
Vintage Inns 41 Harvester 26
Marston's 39 Two for One 28
Slug & Lettuce 38 Flaming Grill 33
Key: High sales growthMedium sales growthLow Sales growth
Source: MCA Eating Out Panel, 12 months to June 2016 & minimum sample size of 30 applies. Note: Sales growth is categorised as percentage turnover growth, less than 0% is low, 0-5% medium and more than 5% is high.
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
KPIs of pub brands (1 of 2) – lunch & dinner, 2016Sizzling Pubs leads in value for money. Miller & Carter performs well in atmosphere and food quality, scoring 8.5 and 8.7 respectively.
COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
KPIs of pub brands – lunch & dinner combined, 2016
61
Rank Convenient locationAtmosphere/ environment
Value for money Low prices Speed of service Friendly service Food quality/ taste
1 Eating Inn 9.0Miller & Carter
8.5 Sizzling Pubs 8.7Crown Carveries
8.6 Toby Carvery 8.3 Table 8.7Miller & Carter
8.7
2 Sizzling Pubs 8.9 Eating Inn 8.5Crown Carveries
8.7 Wetherspoon 8.5Crown Carveries
8.2 Marston's 8.7 O'Neill's 8.6
3 Ember Inns 8.9 Vintage Inns 8.4 Eating Inn 8.6 Sizzling Pubs 8.5 Yates's 8.2 Sizzling Pubs 8.7 Sizzling Pubs 8.5
4 Flaming Grill 8.8 Marston's 8.4 Wetherspoon 8.6 Toby Carvery 8.4 Sizzling Pubs 8.2 Eating Inn 8.7 Marston's 8.5
5 Marston's 8.8 O'Neill's 8.4 Toby Carvery 8.6 Yates's 8.3 Wetherspoon 8.1 Fuller's 8.5 Eating Inn 8.5
6 Table 8.7 Table 8.4 Flaming Grill 8.5 Flaming Grill 8.2 Eating Inn 8.1 Flaming Grill 8.5 Toby Carvery 8.5
7 Wetherspoon 8.7 Two for One 8.3 Marston's 8.5 Hungry Horse 8.2 Marston's 8.1 Vintage Inns 8.5 Table 8.5
8Crown Carveries
8.7 Fuller's 8.2 Hungry Horse 8.4Fayre & Square
8.1 Fuller's 8.1 Two for One 8.5Slug & Lettuce
8.4
9Slug & Lettuce
8.7 Sizzling Pubs 8.2Fayre & Square
8.4 Eating Inn 8.1 Flaming Grill 8.1Brewers Fayre
8.4Crown Carveries
8.3
10 Vintage Inns 8.6 Flaming Grill 8.2 Brewers Fayre 8.3 Marston's 8.1 O'Neill's 8.0Crown Carveries
8.4 Flaming Grill 8.3
Source: MCA Eating Out Panel, 12 months to June 2016. Minimum sample size of 30 applies. KPIs are based on a scale of 1-10 (from very poor to excellent).
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
KPIs of pub brands (2 of 2) – lunch & dinner, 2016O’Neill’s ranks highest for overall experience. Among branded operators, Miller & Carter and O’Neill’s rank highly for key metrics including freshness and overall experience. Value pub chain, Sizzling Pubs, comes second for overall experience and first for menu choice.
COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
KPIs of pub brands – lunch & dinner combined, 2016
62
Rank Drink quality/ taste Freshness Menu choice CleanlinessEthical practices/
productsFamily friendly Overall experience
1 Fuller's 8.6Miller & Carter
8.8 Sizzling Pubs 8.5Miller & Carter
8.7 O'Neill's 8.0Two for One
8.6 O'Neill's 8.7
2 Sizzling Pubs 8.6 Table 8.6 Flaming Grill 8.5 Eating Inn 8.6 Yates's 7.9Sizzling Pubs
8.5 Sizzling Pubs 8.7
3 Marston's 8.6Sizzling pubs
8.4 Marston's 8.4 Marston's 8.6Two for One
7.6 Marston's 8.5Miller & Carter
8.7
4 Flaming Grill 8.5 Marston's 8.4 O'Neill's 8.4 Table 8.6 Fuller's 7.6Hungry Horse
8.4 Eating Inn 8.6
5 Table 8.5 O'Neill's 8.4 Hungry Horse 8.4 Fuller's 8.5 All Bar One 7.6Toby Carvery
8.4 Marston's 8.6
6 Eating Inn 8.5Toby Carvery
8.4 Eating Inn 8.3Vintage Inns
8.5Miller & Carter
7.6Crown Carveries
8.4 Toby Carvery 8.5
7 Toby Carvery 8.4Vintages Inns
8.4Chef & Brewer
8.3Slug & Lettuce
8.4 Marston's 7.5Fayre & Square
8.3 Table 8.4
8 O'Neill's 8.4 Eating Inn 8.3 Wetherspoon 8.3Sizzling Pubs
8.4Sizzling Pubs
7.5 Eating Inn 8.3 Brewers Fayre 8.4
9 Wetherspoon 8.4Crown Carveries
8.3Fayre & Square
8.3 O'Neill's 8.4 Table 7.5 Table 8.3 Wetherspoon 8.4
10 Vintage Inns 8.4Slug & Lettuce
8.3Slug and Lettuce
8.3Flaming Grill
8.4 Beefeater 7.5Brewers Fayre
8.3Crown Carveries
8.3
Source: MCA Eating Out Panel, 12 months to June 2016. Minimum sample size of 30 applies. KPIs are based on a scale of 1-10 (from very poor to excellent).
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
8.5 8.5 8.5 8.3 8.5 8.6 8.3 8.2 8.5 8.2
8.7 8.6 8.6 8.7 8.5 8.3 8.5 8.6 8.2 8.4
Sizzling Pubs Eating Inn Toby Carvery CrownCarveries
Marston's O'Neill's Flaming Grill Wetherspoon Table Table Hungry Horse
Food quality/taste Value for money
KPI case study – pub brands, lunch & dinner, 2016Sizzling Pubs achieves the highest combined score for value for money and food quality/taste. O’Neill’s performs well in food quality but has one of the lowest scores for value for money. Crown Carveries performs well in value for money but scores comparatively low in food quality.
COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
Leading pub brands, lunch & dinner combined, KPIs of food quality and value for money, ranked by combined score, 2016
63
17.2 16.816.917.017.017.017.1 16.616.716.8
Source: MCA Eating Out Panel, 12 months to June 2016 & minimum sample size of 30 applies
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016 64
Introduction and background
Executive summary
Market
Competitive landscape
Section summary
Financial performance and outlet growth
Key performance indicators
Profiles of the top 20 restaurant brands
Competitive landscape
Consumer insight
Consumer typology analysis
Bespoke consumer research
Future outlook
Contents
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Profiles of the top 20 restaurant brands by turnover
COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
65
Rank Brand
1 McDonald's
2 Wetherspoon
3 KFC
4 Nando's
5 Burger King
6 PizzaExpress
7 Harvester
8 Frankie & Benny's
9 Hungry Horse
10 Pizza Hut Restaurants
11 Toby Carvery
12 Sizzling Pubs
13 Vintage Inns
14 Brewers Fayre
15 Beefeater
16 T.G.I. Friday's
17 Prezzo
18 Chef & Brewer
19 Wagamama
20 Zizzi
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
McDonald’sFast food burger brand with a global presence, McDonald’s is the largest UK restaurant brand. Approximately 30% of UK restaurants are company owned, and the rest franchised. McDonald’s is a UK fast food pioneer in local sourcing, with a commitment to using British and Irish farmers for its ingredients. Restaurants are located across UK High Streets, in airports, out-of-town sites, service stations and shopping centres. In early 2016 McDonald’s announced plans to roll out table service to 400 UK restaurants.
COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
66
Company and management
Cuisine Burger
Category Traditional fast food
Service style Counter service
Parent company
McDonald’s Corporation
Head office11-59 High RoadEast FinchleyLondon N2 8AW
Website www.mcdonalds.co.uk
OwnershipCompany owned and franchised
Senior Management UK
• CEO, Paul Pomroy• COO, Richard Forte• Chief Marketing Officer, Alistair Macrow
Estate size and financials
Dec 2013
Dec 2014
Dec 2015
Dec 2016E
UK outlets 1,230 1,255 1,277 1,297
London outlets 270 274 275 279
Regional outlets 960 981 1,002 1,018
Annualised estimated turnover (m)
2013 2014 2015 2016E
£1,967 £2,026 £2,085 £2,116
NotesTurnover figures include company-owned and franchised stores, and are based on average weekly sales.
Estimated avg. weekly sales per outlet (ex-VAT)
£31,600
Avg. diner spend £5
Q2 2015 Q2 2016YoY growth
NPS 12 15 ↑25%
Revisit intention 8.4 8.5 ↑1%
Pricing and marketing activities
Entry Typical Exit
Starter dish N/A N/A N/A
Main course £0.89 £2.99 £4.09
Side dish £0.89 £1.09 £1.39
Dessert £0.79 £0.89 £0.99
Take-away Yes
Breakfast Yes
Mailing list/loyalty scheme and recent marketing activity
• McCafé Loyalty Card• Chicken legend range• Premium ranges
Future plans
• Launching smartphone coupon app across Europe
• Doubling the number of restaurants using digital menus
• Refranchise at least 1,500 restaurants by 2016
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
WetherspoonWetherspoon is the leading UK branded chain of pubs offering traditional pub food and drink at highly competitive prices. The group has extended its menu to include premium burgers and international cuisine dishes. Outlets have extended opening hours, opening from 7am, serving coffee and breakfast options. Sites are located on High Streets in town and city centres, and appeal to a wide, value-conscious demographic.
COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
67
Company and management
Cuisine Pub food
Category Pub restaurant
Service style Semi-counter service
Parent company
JD Wetherspoon Plc
Head officeWetherspoon HouseReeds CrescentWatford, WD24 4QL
Website www.jdwetherspoon.co.uk
Ownership Company owned
Senior Management
• Tim Martin, Chairman• John Hutson, CEO
Estate size and financials
Dec 2013
Dec 2014
Dec 2015
Dec 2016E
UK outlets 750 782 789 773
London outlets 133 139 140 140
Regional outlets 617 643 649 633
Annualised estimated turnover (m)
2013 2014 2015 2016E
£1,080 £1,199 £1,413 £1,426
NotesOutlet and turnover figures do not include Lloyds No. 1 bars.
Estimated avg. weekly sales per outlet (ex-VAT)
£35,100
Avg. diner spend £10
Q2 2015 Q2 2016YoY growth
NPS
Revisit intention
39 35 ↓10%
8.7 8.7 ↔0%
Pricing and marketing activities
Entry Typical Exit
Starter dish £3.55 £4.10 £4.80
Main course £5.75 £7.19 £13.99
Side dish £0.95 £3.10 £3.70
Dessert £2.50 £2.50 £4.10
Take-away Yes
Breakfast Yes
Mailing list/loyalty scheme and recent marketing activity
• Various weekday clubs• Give feedback online and
claim a free drink• Deli deals, deli item and a
drink for £3.99 available all day every day
Future plans
• Wetherspoon looking to dispose of a further 33 pubs in 2016
• Wetherspoon staff to keep bonuses and free shares despite living wage increase
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
KFCAmerican fast food chicken concept, owned by YUM! Brands and famed for its ‘Colonel’ logo and Kentucky Fried Chicken product. KFC was the first US fast food brand to enter the UK, when it opened in 1965. Restaurants are situated on major UKHigh Streets, in airports, motorway service stations and in out-of-town locations (increasingly with drive-thru facilities). KFC’s bucket deals have strong appeal among families and young and middle-aged adults. In 2015 KFC began to roll out a major refurbishment programme across its UK estate.
COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
68
Company and management
Cuisine Chicken
Category Traditional fast food
Service style Counter service
Parent company
YUM! Brands International
Head office32 Goldsworth RoadWokingSurrey, GU21 6BR
Website www.kfc.co.uk
OwnershipCompany owned and franchised
Senior Management
• Martin Shuker, MD, KFC UK• David Timm, Marketing Chief, KFC UK• Russel Smith, Chief Operating Officer, KFC
UK
Estate size and financials
Dec 2013
Dec 2014
Dec 2015
Dec 2016E
UK outlets 798 815 832 850
London outlets 168 170 176 179
Regional outlets 630 645 656 671
Annualised estimated turnover (m)
2013 2014 2015 2016E
£924 £931 £964 £994
NotesTurnover figures are for company-owned and franchised restaurants.
Estimated avg. weekly sales per outlet (ex-VAT)
£22,700
Avg. diner spend £6
Q2 2015 Q2 2016YoY growth
NPS 18 15 ↓17%
Revisit intention 8.4 8.4 ↔0%
Pricing and marketing activities
Entry Typical Exit
Starter dish N/A N/A N/A
Main course £3.55 £4.99 £6.99
Side dish £0.99 £1.49 £1.69
Dessert £0.89 £1.69 £1.89
Take-away Yes
Breakfast Selected stores only
Mailing list/loyalty scheme and recent marketing activity
• Colonel’s Club: collect Chicken Stamps to earn rewards
• KFC Fast Track mobile ordering app
• 10% off for Armed Forces
Future plans• Smaller footprint concept
for city center, intention of opening up to 200 new sites
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Nando’sRenowned casual chicken concept with an almost cult following. Nando’s sits between a fast food and casual concept, with semi-counter service, competitive prices and a relaxed and fun environment, attracting young (18-35-year-old) customers. Restaurants are located across the UK in leisure parks, premium shopping centres and high-footfall High Streets.
COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
69
Company and management
Cuisine Chicken
Category Casual restaurant
Service style Semi-counter service
Parent company
Nando’s Group Holdings
Head officeSt Marys House,42 Vicarage Crescent, London SW11 3LD
Website www.nandos.co.uk
Ownership Company owned in the UK
Senior Management
• Robbie Brozin, Co-founder and CEO • Robby Enthoven, Principal, Capricorn
Ventures UK• Andrew Rayner, Marketing Director
Estate size and financials
Dec 2013
Dec 2014
Dec 2015
Dec 2016E
UK outlets 290 319 341 375
London outlets 84 93 99 99
Regional outlets 206 226 242 276
Annualised estimated turnover (m)
2013 2014 2015 2016E
£431 £470 £518 £579
NotesTurnover figures are based on company accounts.
Estimated avg. weekly sales per outlet (ex-VAT)
£31,100
Avg. diner spend £12
Q2 2015 Q2 2016YoY growth
NPS
Revisit intention
34 35 ↑3%
8.7 8.6 ↓11%
Pricing and marketing activities
Entry Typical Exit
Starter dish £2.40 £3.55 £3.55
Main course £4.40 £9.95 £14.60
Side dish £2.40 £2.95 £4.40
Dessert £1.95 £2.95 £4.30
Take-away Yes
Breakfast No (except airport sites)
Mailing list/loyalty scheme and recent marketing activity
• Nando's Card: earn points and redeem rewards
• 20% off for all British Emergency Services and military forces employees
Future plans• Further focus on regional
expansion
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Burger KingAmerican fast food chain, Burger King, is the UK’s second largest burger brand. All UK restaurants are owned and operated byindependent franchisees. The business aims to differentiate itself from leading rivals by focusing on high quality burgers and,as a result, is less family-orientated. Restaurants are located in prime locations throughout the UK. In 2016 Burger King began serving alcohol at selected UK sites and rolled out delivery to 40 stores.
COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
70
Company and management
Cuisine Burger
Category Traditional fast food
Service style Counter service
Parent company
Restaurant Brands International/Burger King Corporation
Head office15 Bath Road, SloughBerkshireSL1 3UF
Website www.burgerking.co.uk
Ownership Franchised
Senior Management
• Bruno Lino, President EMEA • Daniel S. Schwartz, CEO
Estate size and financials
Dec 2013
Dec 2014
Dec 2015
Dec 2016E
UK outlets 480 471 502 518
London outlets 66 67 75 77
Regional outlets 414 404 427 441
Annualised estimated turnover (m)
2013 2014 2015 2016E
£471 £533 £544 £576
NotesTurnover figures are based on estimated average weekly sales.
Estimated avg. weekly sales per outlet (ex-VAT)
£21,500
Avg. diner spend £6
Q2 2015 Q2 2016YoY growth
NPS
Revisit intention
0 -1 N/A
7.9 7.9 ↔0%
Pricing and marketing activities
Entry Typical Exit
Starter dish N/A N/A N/A
Main course £1.89 £3.89 £7.29
Side dish £1.49 £1.99 £3.49
Dessert £0.89 £1.39 £1.39
Take-away Yes
Breakfast Yes
Mailing list/loyalty scheme and recent marketing activity
• Sign up to database to receive latest offers
• Mobile app for iOS and Android: Vouchers, store locator and menu
Future plans• Exploring options of alcohol
and delivery after successful trials
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
PizzaExpressPizzaExpress is the leading UK Italian pizzeria, with the greatest number of outlets of any UK casual restaurant brand. PizzaExpress is a high profile user of promotional discounting, and is combining this with more sophisticated customer relationship management. In July 2014, Pizza Express was sold by the Gondola Group to Beijing based private equity firm Hony Capital for £900m. In 2016 PizzaExpress acquired the fledgling premium pizza delivery chain, Firezza.
COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
71
Company and management
Cuisine Italian – Pizza/Pasta
Category Casual restaurant
Service style Table service
Parent company
Hony Capital
Head office5th Floor,2 Balcombe StreetLondon, NW1 6NW
Website www.pizzaexpress.com
Ownership Company owned
Senior Management
• Richard Hodgson, CEO, PizzaExpress• Andy Pellington, Chief Financial Officer,
PizzaExpress
Estate size and financials
Dec 2013
Dec 2014
Dec 2015
Dec 2016E
UK outlets 410 427 442 452
London outlets 140 145 156 160
Regional outlets 270 282 286 292
Annualised estimated turnover (m)
2013 2014 2015 2016E
£369 £380 £407 £427
NotesTurnover figures are based on estimated average weekly sales.
Estimated avg. weekly sales per outlet (ex-VAT)
£18,400
Avg. diner spend £15
Q2 2015 Q2 2016YoY growth
NPS 30 32 ↑7%
Revisit intention 8.5 8.4 ↓1%
Pricing and marketing activities
Entry Typical Exit
Starter dish £3.95 £5.25 £7.75
Main course £8.95 £10.95 £14.45
Side dish £3.35 £3.95 £5.25
Dessert £3.95 £5.95 £6.45
Take-away Yes
Breakfast Selected international outlets
Mailing list/loyalty scheme and recent marketing activity
• Starter & main for £9.95• 40% off food bill• 3 courses for £12.95• O2 priority: £5 main course
every week
Future plans• Expanding delivery at both
PizzaExpress sites and by growing Firezza
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
HarvesterLong-established farmhouse-style pub restaurant, owned by Mitchells & Butlers. Harvester is a favourite among families and older consumers, with traditional pub food and its famous salad bar. Restaurants are located across the UK in out-of-town locations, with some branches close to an Innkeeper’s Lodge, also owned by M&B.
COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
72
Company and management
Cuisine Pub food
Category Pub restaurant
Service style Table service
Parent company
Mitchells & Butlers Plc
Head office27 Fleet StreetBirminghamB3 1JP
Website www.harvester.co.uk
Ownership Company owned
Senior Management
• Phil Urban, CEO, M&B• Bob Ivell, Non-Executive Chairman, M&B• Catriona Kempston, Marketing Director,
M&B • Tim Jones, Finance Director, M&B
Estate size and financials
Dec 2013
Dec 2014
Dec 2015
Dec 2016E
UK outlets 210 217 231 220
London outlets 31 37 31 30
Regional outlets 179 180 200 190
Annualised estimated turnover (m)
2013 2014 2015 2016E
£296 £307 £322 £329
NotesTurnover figures are based on estimated average weekly sales.
Estimated avg. weekly sales per outlet (ex-VAT)
£28,100
Avg. diner spend £16
Q2 2015 Q2 2016YoY growth
NPS
Revisit intention
35 26 ↓26%
8.5 8.4 ↓1%
Pricing and marketing activities
Entry Typical Exit
Starter dish £2.99 £3.69 £5.29
Main course £4.99 £7.99 £18.49
Side dish £1.99 £2.49 £3.99
Dessert £3.79 £4.49 £4.99
Take-away Yes
Breakfast Yes
Mailing list/loyalty scheme and recent marketing activity
• Register email address and/or mobile number to receive news and offers
• Harvester app: exclusive offers and rewards
Future plans
• Invest in digital technology after launching contactless payments across sites
• Continue selected site conversions to Miller & Carter
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Frankie & Benny’sFrankie & Benny’s serves classic Italian-American cuisine in a 1950s New York themed atmosphere. The restaurant chain is family-friendly with its wide menu choice and lively environment. Frankie & Benny’s outlets are found in out-of-town retail and leisure park sites across the UK.
COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
73
Company and management
Cuisine Italian American
Category Casual
Service style Table service
Parent company
The Restaurant Group Plc
Head office5-7 Marshalsea RoadBoroughLondon, SE1 1EP
Website www.frankieandbennys.com
Ownership Company owned
Senior Management
• Danny Breithaupt, CEO, TRG• Stephen Critoph, Financial Director, TRG• Alan Jackson, Non-executive chairman, TRG
Estate size and financials
Dec 2013
Dec 2014
Dec 2015
Dec 2016E
UK outlets 227 244 253 252
London outlets 18 19 17 15
Regional outlets 209 225 236 237
Annualised estimated turnover (m)
2013 2014 2015 2016E
£273 £291 £317 £318
NotesTurnover figures are based on estimated average weekly sales.
Estimated avg. weekly sales per outlet (ex-VAT)
£24,700
Avg. diner spend £15
Q2 2015 Q2 2016YoY growth
NPS
Revisit intention
27 28 ↑4%
8.3 8.3 ↔0%
Pricing and marketing activities
Entry Typical Exit
Starter dish £4.95 £5.95 £6.45
Main course £8.95 £11.95 £21.95
Side dish £1.95 £3.95 £4.35
Dessert £4.45 £5.95 £8.95
Take-away Yes
Breakfast Yes
Mailing list/loyalty scheme and recent marketing activity
• F&B Rewards, sign up online• Midweek Menu: 2 courses for
£11.95
Future plans• Greater focus on arresting
like-for-like sales decline
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Hungry HorseGreene King’s family-friendly, value-focused pub/restaurant chain. With renowned weekly themed promotions, Hungry Horse pubs have a strong value for money proposition. With entertainment including televised events, pub quizzes and children’s play areas, establishments have broad appeal across the mass middle market. The brand has a predominantly regional focus, with outlets situated on large out-of-town sites with extensive car parking.
COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
74
Company and management
Cuisine Pub food
Category Pub restaurant
Service style Table service
Parent company
Greene King Plc
Head officeWestgate BreweryBury St EdmundsSuffolk, IP33 1QT
Website www.hungryhorse.co.uk
Ownership Company owned
Senior Management
• Rooney Anand, CEO, GK• Kirk Davis, Finance Director, GK• Ian Durant, Non Executive Director
Estate size and financials
Dec 2013
Dec 2014
Dec 2015
Dec 2016E
UK outlets 210 236 245 265
London outlets 10 4 4 3
Regional outlets 200 232 241 262
Annualised estimated turnover (m)
2013 2014 2015 2016E
£229 £252 £276 £299
NotesTurnover figures are based on estimated average weekly sales.
Estimated avg. weekly sales per outlet (ex-VAT)
£22,500
Avg. diner spend £12
Q2 2015 Q2 2016YoY growth
NPS
Revisit intention
29 23 ↓21%
8.4 8.5 ↑1%
Pricing and marketing activities
Entry Typical Exit
Starter dish £1.79 £3.99 £3.99
Main course £2.99 £7.99 £12.99
Side dish £0.79 £1.99 £2.59
Dessert £1.49 £3.79 £3.99
Take-away No
Breakfast Yes
Mailing list/loyalty scheme and recent marketing activity
• Themed daily specials e.g. ‘Curry Club Wednesday’
• Sign up online and get a £5 giftcard
• 2 meals for £9.99 Monday to Friday
• Free soft drinks for designated drivers
Future plans
• Roll out of pizza offer• Identified as one of Greene
King’s growth brands post-spirit acquisition
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Pizza Hut RestaurantsPizza Hut features competitive price points, with the chain targeting families and C1/C2/D consumers. Restaurants are often located in high footfall shopping districts, in leisure parks and at leading airports and high streets across the UK. Pizza Hut UK consists of two separate businesses – dine-in restaurants owned by Rutland Partners, comprising approximately 285 units, and a delivery service operated by YUM! Brands
COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
75
Company and management
Cuisine Pizza
Category Casual restaurant
Service style Table service
Parent company
Rutland Partners
Head office1 Imperial PlaceBorehamwoodHertfordshire, WD6 5XX
Website www.pizzahut.co.uk
Ownership Company owned
Senior Management
• Jens Hofma, CEO, Pizza Hut Restaurants UK• Victoria Simspson Clarke, Marketing
Director, Pizza Hut UK
Estate size and financials
Dec 2013
Dec 2014
Dec 2015
Dec 2016E
UK outlets 285 280 280 285
London outlets 103 99 99 99
Regional outlets 182 181 181 186
Annualised estimated turnover (m)
2013 2014 2015 2016E
£230 £225 £225 £235
NotesFigures refer to Pizza Hut UK dine in restaurants only
Estimated avg. weekly sales per outlet (ex-VAT)
£18,700
Avg. diner spend £15
Q2 2015 Q2 2016YoY growth
NPS
Revisit intention
30 21 ↓30%
8.4 8.2 ↓2%
Pricing and marketing activities
Entry Typical Exit
Starter dish £2.95 £4.75 £5.25
Main course £8.75 £9.99 £11.55
Side dish £2.95 £4.75 £5.25
Dessert £3.45 £4.75 £5.45
Take-away Yes
Breakfast No
Mailing list/loyalty scheme and recent marketing activity
• Sign up to mailing list for latest news and offers
• Unlimited Lunch Buffet £6.99, Weekdays until 3pm
• Free unlimited salad• Two’sday Tuesday: Buy one
pizza get one free
Future plans• Completion of refurbishment
programme
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Toby CarveryA market leader in carvery dining for over 30 years, offering traditional British dishes in a relaxed and family-friendly environment. The brand boasts higher than average sales per pub and features extensive vegetarian options as well. Toby Carvery restaurants have a strong nationwide presence, located in out of town sites, with extensive car parking facilities.
COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
76
Company and management
Cuisine British
Category Pub restaurant
Service style Buffet
Parent company
Mitchells & Butlers Plc
Head office27 Fleet StreetBirminghamB3 1JP
Website www.tobycarvery.co.uk
Ownership Company owned
Senior Management
• Phil Urban, CEO, M&B• Bob Ivell, Non-Executive Chairman, M&B • Tim Jones, Finance Director, M&B
Estate size and financials
Dec 2013
Dec 2014
Dec 2015
Dec 2016E
UK outlets 154 161 173 173
London outlets 18 19 17 19
Regional outlets 136 142 156 154
Annualised estimated turnover (m)
2013 2014 2015 2016E
£237 £245 £260 £269
NotesTurnover figures are based on estimated average weekly sales.
Estimated avg. weekly sales per outlet (ex-VAT)
£29,900
Avg. diner spend £12
Q2 2015 Q2 2016YoY growth
NPS
Revisit intention
49 43 ↓12%
8.9 8.8 ↓1%
Pricing and marketing activities
Entry Typical Exit
Starter dish £2.89 £3.59 £3.89
Main course £4.19 £6.29 £8.29
Side dish £1.00 £1.60 £1.99
Dessert £2.99 £3.79 £5.99
Take-away Yes
Breakfast Yes
Mailing list/loyalty scheme and recent marketing activity
• 2 courses for 2 people for £12.50
• 25% off Monday to Thursday• Free back to school sundaes• Free ice cream sundae when
you sign up for offers and news
Future plans
• M&B has partnered with South African Winery Gabb Family Vineyards to develop a range of complimentary wines for the menus of its Toby Carvery pubs
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Sizzling PubsIndividually named family-friendly, local pubs with a community feel. Broad menus offer value-for-money food suited to all tastes. Grilled steaks and burgers sit alongside pastas, fajitas and British pub classics. Sizzling Pubs are located in suburban areas widely spread across the UK with clusters in the midlands.
COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
77
Company and management
Cuisine Pub food
Category Pub restaurant
Service style Semi-counter service
Parent company
Mitchells & Butlers Plc
Head office27 Fleet StreetBirminghamB3 1JP
Website www.sizzlingpubs.co.uk
Ownership Company owned
Senior Management
• Phil Urban, CEO, M&B• Bob Ivell, Non-Executive Chairman, M&B • Tim Jones, Finance Director, M&B
Estate size and financials
Dec 2013
Dec 2014
Dec 2015
Dec 2016E
UK outlets 219 222 230 250
London outlets 12 13 12 13
Regional outlets 207 209 218 237
Annualised estimated turnover (m)
2013 2014 2015 2016E
£231 £232 £240 £262
NotesTurnover figures are based on estimated average weekly sales.
Estimated avg. weekly sales per outlet (ex-VAT)
£21,000
Avg. diner spend £12
Q2 2015 Q2 2016YoY growth
NPS
Revisit intention
38 47 ↑24%
8.6 8.9 ↑3%
Pricing and marketing activities
Entry Typical Exit
Starter dish £2.29 £2.99 £3.49
Main course £3.29 £6.49 £13.49
Side dish £1.00 £1.50 £2.49
Dessert £0.99 £3.79 £4.19
Take-away No
Breakfast Selected branches
Mailing list/loyalty scheme and recent marketing activity
• Sign up for newsletter and get £5 off food
• Weekday deals e.g. Thursday Grill club
• Burger and drink deal from £4.49
Future plans
• M&B is in the process of converting Crown Carveries and Sizzling Pub formats into a broader concept called Stonehouse Pizza & Carvery
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Vintage InnsVintage Inns is a mid-upper market country pub chain operated by Mitchells & Butlers. The pubs are predominantly food-led with a traditional menu featuring seasonal pub classics, as well as weekly themed menus such as ‘Wednesday Vintage Pie day’. Vintage Inns are destination pubs, usually found in attractive rural areas.
COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
78
Company and management
Cuisine Pub Classics
Category Pub restaurant
Service style Table service
Parent company
Mitchells & Butlers Plc
Head office27 Fleet StreetBirminghamB3 1JP
Website www.vintageinn.co.uk
Ownership Company owned
Senior Management
• Bob Ivell, Chairman, M&B• Phil Urban, Chief Executive Officer, M&B• Tim Jones, Finance Director, M&B
Estate size and financials
Dec 2013
Dec 2014
Dec 2015
Dec 2016E
UK outlets 194 195 191 197
London outlets 14 14 13 13
Regional outlets 180 181 178 184
Annualised estimated turnover (m)
2013 2014 2015 2016E
£234 £238 £236 £242
NotesTurnover figures are for company-owned and franchised restaurants.
Estimated avg. weekly sales per outlet (ex-VAT)
£24,000
Avg. diner spend £19
Q2 2015 Q2 2016YoY growth
NPS 41 48 ↑17%
Revisit intention 8.8 8.7 ↓1%
Pricing and marketing activities
Entry Typical Exit
Starter dish £3.50 £4.95 £5.95
Main course £5.50 £10.95 £17.49
Side dish £2.00 £2.50 £2.95
Dessert £4.25 £5.25 £5.95
Take-away Yes
Breakfast Selected stores only
Mailing list/loyalty scheme and recent marketing activity
• Sign up and receive a free bar snack voucher
• 3 courses from £20 on a Saturday
• Fizz Friday: discounted Champagne, Prosecco and sparkling wine
Future plans• M&B plans to install pizza
ovens in all Vintage Inns pubs
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Brewers FayrePub restaurant owned by the Whitbread Group, present in out-of-town locations and often close to partner budget hotel chain, Premier Inn. Pubs are named individually but operate under the Brewers Fayre brand. The chain has a family-friendly focus, with many pub restaurants featuring play areas. Brewers Fayre is most popular with middle aged, C1/C2 consumers, with low prices and themed evenings, such as ‘curry night’.
COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
79
Company and management
Cuisine Pub food
Category Pub restaurant
Service style Table service
Parent company
Whitbread Group Plc
Head office
Whitbread CourtBusiness ParkPorz Avenue, DunstableBedfordshire, LU5 5XE
Website www.brewersfayre.co.uk
Ownership Company owned
Senior Management
• Andy Harrison, CEO, Whitbread• Paul Flaum, MD of Restaurants
Estate size and financials
Dec 2013
Dec 2014
Dec 2015
Dec 2016E
UK outlets 150 158 161 166
London outlets 2 3 3 3
Regional outlets 148 155 158 163
Annualised estimated turnover (m)
2013 2014 2015 2016E
£175 £205 £214 £222
NotesTurnover figures are based on estimated average weekly sales.
Estimated avg. weekly sales per outlet (ex-VAT)
£26,100
Avg. diner spend £12
Q2 2015 Q2 2016YoY growth
NPS
Revisit intention
39 32 ↓18%
8.9 8.7 ↓2%
Pricing and marketing activities
Entry Typical Exit
Starter dish £2.99 £3.99 £4.99
Main course £6.99 £8.49 £15.99
Side dish £1.49 £2.49 £3.99
Dessert £2.69 £3.99 £4.49
Take-away Pizza only
Breakfast Selected branches
Mailing list/loyalty scheme and recent marketing activity
• ‘Bonus Club’ – collect points and exchange for vouchers
• Disco night: Fridays and Saturdays
• 2 meals for £10.99 Monday to Friday
• Kids eat free at breakfast
Future plans• Integration of Taybarn
conversions into estate• Roll-out of new format
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
BeefeaterMid-market chain of grill restaurants owned by Whitbread. Beefeater pubs have a nationwide presence and are often found in out of town locations, motorways service stations and business parks. Established in the 1970s, Beefeater appeals to middle-aged, traditional consumers. In 2015 Whitbread opened the first site of its new-look Beefeater concept, Beefeater Bar + Block, in central Birmingham.
COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
80
Company and management
Cuisine Pub food
Category Pub restaurant
Service style Table service
Parent company
Whitbread Group Plc
Head office
Whitbread CourtBusiness ParkPorz Avenue, DunstableBedfordshire, LU5 5XE
Website www.beefeater.co.uk
Ownership Company owned
Senior Management
• Alison Brittain, CEO, Whitbread• Paul Flaum, MD of Hotels and Restaurants
Estate size and financials
Dec 2013
Dec 2014
Dec 2015
Dec 2016E
UK outlets 140 143 142 150
London outlets 11 11 11 11
Regional outlets 129 132 131 139
Annualised estimated turnover (m)
2013 2014 2015 2016E
£193 £198 £204 £213
NotesTurnover figures are based on estimated average weekly sales.
Estimated avg. weekly sales per outlet (ex-VAT)
£27,800
Avg. diner spend £16
Q2 2015 Q2 2016YoY growth
NPS
Revisit intention
24 28 ↑17%
8.2 8.4 ↑2%
Pricing and marketing activities
Entry Typical Exit
Starter dish £4.29 £4.99 £5.99
Main course £8.49 £10.99 £21.49
Side dish £1.99 £2.89 £3.99
Dessert £3.99 £4.99 £5.29
Take-away No
Breakfast Yes
Mailing list/loyalty scheme and recent marketing activity
• The Reward Club: collect points and turn into vouchers
• Unlimited Breakfast £8.25 and Kids Eat Free
• Steak and Unlimited chips from £10.99
Future plans
• Whitbread is rolling out an evolved version of its Beefeater brand – Beefeater Bar + Block – to widen appeal to younger demographics
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
T.G.I. Friday’s All-American casual restaurant and bar strongly associated with its red and white striped branding. Offering a large cocktail menu and lively atmosphere, the chain is popular with large dining parties of 18-30-year-olds. T.G.I. has a nationwide presencein both central and out-of-town locations. Restaurants can be found in city centres, retail parks, shopping centres and airports.
COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
81
Company and management
Cuisine American
Category Casual
Service style Table service
Parent company
Electra Partners
Head officeTGI Friday’s (HO) 253-254 Capability Green Luton Bedfordshire LU1 3LU
Website www.tgifridays.co.uk
Ownership Company owned
Senior Management
• Karen Forrester, MD• Darrell Wade, Chief Operating Officer• Alex Fortescue, Chief Investment Partner of
Electra Partners
Estate size and financials
Dec 2013
Dec 2014
Dec 2015
Dec 2016E
UK outlets 60 66 72 77
London outlets 10 11 11 12
Regional outlets
50 55 61 65
Annualised estimated turnover (m)
2013 2014 2015 2016E
£162 £174 £191 £208
NotesTurnover figures are based on estimated average weekly sales.
Estimated avg. weekly sales per outlet (ex-VAT)
£53,600
Avg. diner spend £15
Q2 2015 Q2 2016 YoY growth
NPS
Revisit intention
33 24 ↓27%
8.5 8.3 ↓2%
Pricing and marketing activities
Entry Typical Exit
Starter dish £3.49 £5.49 £6.99
Main course £8.99 £10.99 £29.49
Side dish £1.99 £3.49 £4.99
Dessert £4.99 £5.49 £5.99
Take-away Yes
Breakfast Selected branches
Mailing list/loyalty scheme and recent marketing activity
• Sign up for mailing list online• Birthday Club membership
includes free treats• 2-4-1 cocktails
Future plans
• New generation sites, ‘Generation F’, with a wider cocktail menu and live music to be rolled out
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
PrezzoPrezzo restaurants offer a contemporary dining experience with a broad menu including non-Italian items, such as burgers and chips, attracting a younger crowd than its direct competitors. Prezzo has a strong regional city bias and targets buildings of architectural interest.
COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
82
Company and management
Cuisine Italian
Category Casual
Service style Table service
Parent company
TPG
Head office8 Johnston RoadWoodford GreenEssex IG8 0XA
Website www.prezzorestaurants.co.uk
Ownership Company owned
Senior Management
• Jon Hendry-Pickup, CEO• Alan J Millar, Finance Director• Michael Carlton, Chairman• Abel Halpbern, Partner, TPG Capital
Estate size and financials
Dec 2013
Dec 2014
Dec 2015
Dec 2016E
UK outlets 198 218 230 248
London outlets 39 43 51 51
Regional outlets 159 175 179 197
Annualised estimated turnover (m)
2013 2014 2015 2016E
£145 £166 £179 £194
NotesTurnover figures are based on estimated average weekly sales.
Estimated avg. weekly sales per outlet (ex-VAT)
£15,600
Avg. diner spend £16
Q2 2015 Q2 2016YoY growth
NPS
Revisit intention
30 47 ↑57%
8.6 8.9 ↑3%
Pricing and marketing activities
Entry Typical Exit
Starter dish £4.95 £5.95 £6.10
Main course £7.49 £12.19 £15.19
Side dish £3.45 £3.75 £3.95
Dessert £3.75 £5.65 £5.95
Take-away Yes
Breakfast Selected branches
Mailing list/loyalty scheme and recent marketing activity
• Sign up to Prezzo Club for news and offers
• Prezzo App allows customers to view their bill live and pay with their mobiles
• 40% off main courses • Children’s meal deal: 3
courses and a drink for £3.95
Future plans• Continued expansion via TPG
funding
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Chef & Brewer Owned and managed by Greene King, Chef & Brewer serves pub food with a focus on fresh ingredients, freshly cooked. The traditional pub outlets are individually named and occupy attractive sites across the UK. Chef & Brewer runs various food-themed evenings, such as ‘Fish Night’, as well as everyday meal deals and daily specials alongside British pub drink offerings.
COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
83
Company and management
Cuisine Pub food
Category Pub restaurant
Service style Table service
Parent company
Greene King
Head office
Sunrise HouseNinth AvenueBurton-upon-TrentStaffordshire, DE14 3JZ
Website www.chefandbrewer.com
Ownership Company owned
Senior Management
• Rooney Anand, CEO of Greene King• Kirk Davis, CFO of Greene King• John Forrest, COO of Greene King
Estate size and financials
Dec 2013
Dec 2014
Dec 2015
Dec 2016E
UK outlets 137 133 136 141
London outlets 8 8 7 7
Regional outlets 129 125 129 134
Annualised estimated turnover (m)
2013 2014 2015 2016E
£168 £180 £180 £187
NotesTurnover figures are based on estimated average weekly sales.
Estimated avg. weekly sales per outlet (ex-VAT)
£26,000
Avg. diner spend £16
Q2 2015 Q2 2016YoY growth
NPS
Revisit intention
29 24 ↓17%
8.5 8.0 ↓6%
Pricing and marketing activities
Entry Typical Exit
Starter dish £3.49 £4.49 £6.49
Main course £8.49 £10.99 £19.99
Side dish £1.29 £2.99 £2.99
Dessert £3.49 £4.79 £5.99
Take-away No
Breakfast Selected branches
Mailing list/loyalty scheme and recent marketing activity
• Join email club and get free starter or pudding
• Evening set menu: 2 courses from £12.50 from 4pm Monday to Thursday
• Swap Tesco Clubcard points• Fizz Friday: £5 off a bottle of
fizz
Future plans
• Identified as a growth brand by parent company, Greene King. Expected to expand estate to 180-220 sites over the next five years
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
WagamamaPan-Asian noodle concept created by restaurant industry tycoon, Alan Yau. Restaurants feature long communal tables and simple industrial-style interiors. The brand appeals to a wide demographic but is particularly popular with young, urban consumers. Restaurants are located in high footfall areas on the High Street and in major shopping centres.
COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
84
Company and management
Cuisine Asian
Category Casual
Service style Table service
Parent company
Duke Street Capital/Hutton Collins
Head officeWaverley House7-12 Noel StreetLondon, W1F 8GQ
Website www.wagamama.com
Ownership Company owned
Senior Management
• David Campbell, CEO• Jane Holbrok, Chief Financial Officer
Estate size and financials
Dec 2013
Dec 2014
Dec 2015
Dec 2016E
UK outlets 102 112 118 124
London outlets 40 44 40 42
Regional outlets 62 68 78 82
Annualised estimated turnover (m)
2013 2014 2015 2016E
£141 £159 £173 £188
NotesTurnover figures are based on estimated average weekly sales.
Estimated avg. weekly sales per outlet (ex-VAT)
£29,400
Avg. diner spend £10
Q2 2015 Q2 2016YoY growth
NPS 47 28 ↓40%
Revisit intention 8.5 8.6 ↓1%
Pricing and marketing activities
Entry Typical Exit
Starter dish £4.35 £4.95 £6.75
Main course £7.95 £9.25 £14.95
Side dish £1.00 £1.00 £2.00
Dessert £1.65 £4.95 £5.75
Take-away Yes
Breakfast Selected airport branches
Mailing list/loyalty scheme and recent marketing activity
• Sign up to the newsletter for exclusive offers
• Qkr! with Masterpass app, allows customers to pay for meal and split bill
Future plans
• Development of flagship site in St Paul’s
• Roll out of new style restaurants
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
ZizziItalian chain Zizzi offers an upper-middle market dining experience which caters for both couples and families. With a localised strategy, each site has a unique touch in terms of architecture and menu. Restaurants are positioned on major UK high streets and in suburban areas. Brand is targeted at more special and weekend occasions than alternatives such as ASK.
COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
85
Company and management
Cuisine Italian
Category Casual
Service style Table service
Parent company
Azzurri Restaurants Limited
Head office
3rd Floor Capital HouseChapel StreetLondonNW1 5DH
Website www.zizzi.co.uk
Ownership Company owned
Senior Management
• Steve Holmes, CEO• Johanna Fawcett, Marketing Director• Jim Pickworth, Chief Financial Officer
Estate size and financials
Dec 2013
Dec 2014
Dec 2015
Dec 2016E
UK outlets 136 138 139 147
London outlets 39 27 35 39
Regional outlets 97 111 104 108
Annualised estimated turnover (m)
2013 2014 2015 2016E
£117 £121 £145 £152
NotesTurnover figures relate to total sales across all franchised stores.
Estimated avg. weekly sales per outlet (ex-VAT)
£20,400
Avg. diner spend £14
Q2 2015 Q2 2016YoY growth
NPS 17 11 ↓35%
Revisit intention 8.5 8.5 ↔0%
Pricing and marketing activities
Entry Typical Exit
Starter dish £4.35 £5.55 £7.55
Main course £7.95 £10.25 £15.25
Side dish £3.00 £3.50 £4.35
Dessert £4.45 £5.95 £5.95
Take-away Yes
Breakfast No
Mailing list/loyalty scheme and recent marketing activity
• 20%-40% off all food in selected outlets
Future plans• Expansion of allergen offering
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016 86
Introduction and background
Executive summary
Market
Competitive landscape
Consumer insight
Consumer typology analysis
Bespoke consumer research
Future outlook
Contents
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Consumer Insight – section summaryCONSUMER INSIGHT
Roaring restaurant trade as all key consumer metrics rise for chains, independents and pubs.
• Participation and visit frequency have increased in all restaurant channels except for fast food over the past year. The share of UK consumers participating in fast food fell three percentage points to 71.9%, while the average no. of meals per head per month dropped from 2.1 down to 2.0.
• The rise in restaurant participants has been greatest in chain and fine dining restaurants, up three percentage points for both to 73.4% and 57.3%. Chain, independent and pub restaurants all achieved frequency growth of 0.2 visits per head per month to 1.5, 1.6 and 2.0, with pub levels now equal to fast food.
• Average visit spend has risen in all restaurant channels at all day-parts, with fine dining lunch the only exception. Higher spend levels relate, in-part, to a more affluent customer profile in all key restaurant channels. Female spend has increased most, with 25-49s driving rising levels in chain restaurants and 18-24s driving growth in independents, fast food and fine dining.
Family social and treat occasion opportunity in chain restaurants.
• The growth in visits to chain restaurants has been driven by a rise in occasions involving 25-49s and women, with a particular increase in family visits with the kids for get togethers and treat occasions. Low prices and fresh products are growing needs for increasingly stretched and health conscious parents, but satisfaction levels have grown, with customer scores rising for the freshness, family friendliness and food quality experienced in chain restaurants.
• Contemporary chain restaurants (opened in the last 10 years) have played a crucial role in growth of the channel, accounting for a rising share of lunch and dinner visits. Contemporary chains, such as Byron, Côte and Wahaca, attract a larger share of 18-24s and higher earning consumers than chains in general, with the food quality, environment and atmosphere being much bigger draws. 22% of contemporary chain visits are get togethers, but it is special occasions/celebrations that stand out, accounting for 18% of contemporary chain visits, which is double the proportion in total chain restaurants.
Pubs can benefit from budding female customer presence.
• As pubs have become more food-led and restaurant-like, women have become a growing and vitally important part of the customer mix, now accounting for half of all visits, equal to levels in the total Eating Out market.
• Increases in both pub restaurant visits and average spend have been driven by women, increasingly choosing pubs for low tempo, relaxing meal occasions, citing pubs’ familiarity and service as key reasons for visiting.
Fast food must modernise to win back younger consumers.
• Falling visitor participation and visit frequency levels in fast food have been due to a decrease among 18-34s. In an Eating Out market rife with intensifying cross-channel competition and a growing variety of options targeting the young and adventurous, traditional and independent fast food operators offering specific, but well-trodden cuisine (e.g. burgers, fish & chips and kebabs) without offering anything new or to differentiate themselves, are losing out as younger consumers are tempted elsewhere.
• Despite falling participation and frequency, average spend has risen on fast food visits and it is the remaining 18-24 year old occasions that have driven this the most. Contemporary fast food outlets that offer good quality food, service and an attractive environment are attracting the young to visit and spend more on more premium occasions.
Growing diversity of chain restaurant cuisine attracting greater range of consumers, on variety of missions, for wide mix of needs.
• British food tends to be consumed by an older 50+, low-mid income consumer on more everyday missions, such as when doing other shopping. At the other end of the age scale, Japanese is most likely to be eaten by 18-24s, with a bias to treat missions and a greater need for fresh products.
• Restaurants offering French and Pan-Asian cuisine appeal more to women and on more sociable missions. South American appeals equally to women, but of a more affluent profile and on more functional shopping missions.
87
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
CONSUMER INSIGHT
88
Eating out participationParticipation has increased at all restaurant channels but fast food. The proportion of UK consumers visiting chain, independent, fine dining and pub restaurants has risen over the last year, with the biggest increases for chain restaurants and fine dining, both up by three percentage points to 73% and 57% respectively. The only decrease in restaurant participation has been at fast food outlets, where levels have dropped from 75% to 72%.
70.8%75.6%
54.0%
85.0%
75.1%73.4%77.8%
57.3%
85.8%
71.9%
Chain restaurants Independent restaurants Fine dining restaurants Pub restaurants Fast food restaurants
Q2 2015 Q2 2016
Participation: % of UK adults visiting – Q2 2016 vs. Q2 2015
Note: Data includes all those who claim to visit more often than ‘rarely’.
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Average meal frequency
CONSUMER INSIGHT
Of the restaurant channels, average visit frequency has increased everywhere except fast food. Pubs and fast food outlets are visited most often for a meal, with consumers on average making two visits per head per month. The average number of meals per head per month has grown at chain, independent, fine dining and pub restaurants compared to a year ago, but fallen in fast food. A year ago, fast food was the most frequently visited restaurant channel, but pub restaurants are now visited just as often after levels rose from 1.8 to 2.0 as fast food frequency fell slightly from 2.1 to 2.0.
89
1.31.4
0.9
1.8
2.1
1.51.6
1.0
2.0 2.0
Chain restaurants Independent restaurants Fine dining restaurants Pub restaurants Fast food restaurants
Q2 2015 Q2 2016
Frequency: average no. of out of home meals per head per month – Q2 2016 vs. Q2 2015
Note: Data includes breakfast, lunch and dinner.
+0.2
+0.2
+0.1
+0.2-0.1
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Average spend per meal
CONSUMER INSIGHT
Average spend on a restaurant meal visit has grown over the past year. There has been an 8.7% increase in average restaurant meal visit spend over the last 12 months, just slightly behind total Eating Out market growth of 8.8%. Spend on restaurant meal visits has risen for every channel but fine dining, where levels dropped by 5.5%. Of the restaurant channels, the greatest increase in average meal spend has been in independent restaurants, with levels up 11% to £12.62.
90
£8.84£10.13
£12.91
£11.36
£21.65
£11.27
£6.26
£9.61£11.01
£13.51£12.62
£20.56
£11.80
£6.86
Total market Total restaurants Chain restaurants Independentrestaurants
Fine diningrestaurants
Pub restaurants Fast food restaurants
Q2 2015 Q2 2016
Average spend per head per meal visit – Q2 2016 vs. Q2 2015
+8.8%+8.7%
+4.7%+11.0%
-5.5%
+4.7%
+9.6%
Note: Data includes breakfast, lunch and dinner.
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Average spend per meal by day-part
CONSUMER INSIGHT
Average spend rising for all restaurant meals except fine dining lunches. Growth in average meal spend has occurred in all restaurant channels at all day-parts, except fine dining restaurants at lunch. Chain restaurants achieve a higher average meal spend than independent and pub restaurants at breakfast and lunch, but spending levels are higher in independent restaurants at dinner. Fast food is the lowest spend restaurant channel at all day-parts.
91
£16.24
£16.66
£19.65
£19.47
£36.50
£16.65
£9.26
£17.44
£17.92
£19.90
£20.93
£37.46
£17.21
£10.06
Total market
Totalrestaurants
Chainrestaurants
Independentrestaurants
Fine diningrestaurants
Pubrestaurants
Fast foodrestaurants
Q2 2015
Q2 2016
£7.09
£9.30
£12.66
£9.91
£20.83
£11.32
£5.73
£7.74
£10.12
£13.41
£11.34
£18.56
£11.84
£6.30
Total market
Totalrestaurants
Chainrestaurants
Independentrestaurants
Fine diningrestaurants
Pubrestaurants
Fast foodrestaurants
£4.53
£4.93
£6.36
£5.74
£5.58
£4.17
£4.96
£5.47
£7.08
£6.35
£6.11
£4.56
Total market
Totalrestaurants
Chainrestaurants
Independentrestaurants
Fine diningrestaurants
Pubrestaurants
Fast foodrestaurants
n/an/a
Note: Average meal spend at breakfast unavailable for fine dining restaurants due to low sample size (<100).
Average spend per head per meal visit by day-part – Q2 2016 vs. Q2 2015
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Women and 18-24s key groups driving increase in average meal spend. Across all four of the major restaurant channels, the average amount spent per meal visit has risen faster among women than men. In pubs, fast food and independent restaurants, the biggest growth in average meal spend has been from 18-24s, while levels have increased fastest for 25-49s in chain restaurants.
CONSUMER INSIGHT
Average spend per meal by gender and age
92
£13.39 £13.66
Male Female
£12.05 £13.16 £13.58 £14.19
18-24 25-34 35-49 50+
3% 7%
3% 7% 7%
£12.72 £12.56
Male Female
£11.50 £12.18 £12.68 £12.82
18-24 25-34 35-49 50+
10% 12%
24% 17% 12%
£12.04 £11.56
Male Female
£10.61 £11.51 £12.09 £11.81
18-24 25-34 35-49 50+
4% 5%
12% 1% 6%
£6.80 £6.91
Male Female
£6.93 £7.45 £7.01 £6.09
18-24 25-34 35-49 50+
8% 11%
15% 12% 10%8%
4%
Change vs. Q2 2015
Average spend per head per meal visit by gender and age – Q2 2016
Note: Data includes breakfast, lunch and dinner.
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Average spend rising fast on chain restaurant special occasions. The biggest rise in chain restaurant spend has been on special occasions, with levels up 21% to £17.43 per meal visit. The strongest growth in average meal spend in independent restaurants has been among consumers out shopping, while for pubs it has been on treat missions.
CONSUMER INSIGHT
Average spend per meal by mission (primary reason for eating out)
93
£17.43
£13.29
£14.38
£12.85
£14.65
Special occasion
Having a treat
Get together
While shopping
Spend time withpartner
7%
11%
21%
1%
£9.06
£9.89
£16.99
£13.06
£11.14
While shopping
Not bothered to cook
Special occasion
Leisure-based journey
Wanted specific cuisine
£12.31
£12.28
£12.69
£10.68
£10.92
Having a treat
Get together
Time with partner
At leisure activity
Not bothered to cook
£7.51
£8.13
£7.25
£7.10
£7.02
Work/study break
Get together
While shopping
Leisure-based journey
Because I had to
15%
16%
17%
13%
11%
5%
6%
13%
5%
3%
19%
19%
38%
18%
12%
Note: Data includes breakfast, lunch and dinner. Only missions with sample size of 100+ included.
Change vs. Q2 2015
Average spend per head per meal visit by consumer mission, ranked by % growth in average spend – Q2 2016
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Age of consumer
CONSUMER INSIGHT
25-49s becoming more important for chain restaurants. 53% of chain restaurant visitors are aged 25-49, up from 50% a year ago and compared to 49% in total restaurants. Independent and pub restaurants have an older consumer profile, with 51% and 53% of meal visits respectively accounted for by consumers aged 50 and above, compared to 41% for restaurants in total. Chain restaurants and fast food skew towards consumers aged 18-24, but less so than a year ago, with 35-49s key and gaining importance in fast food outlets.
94
11% 11% 11% 10%16% 14%
7% 7%13% 12%
7% 7%15% 14%
18% 19% 18% 18%
20% 22%
15% 15%
21% 20%
13% 13%
23% 22%
32% 32% 31% 31%
30% 31%
28% 27%
23% 28%
27% 27%
37% 39%
39% 39% 40% 41%34% 32%
50% 51%44% 40%
53% 53%
26% 25%
Q22015
Q22016
Q22015
Q22016
Q22015
Q22016
Q22015
Q22016
Q22015
Q22016
Q22015
Q22016
Q22015
Q22016
50+
35-49
25-34
18-24
Age profile % of meal visits – Q2 2016 vs. Q2 2015
Note: Data includes breakfast, lunch and dinner.
Total restaurants Chain restaurants Pub restaurantsFine dining restaurants
Independent restaurants
Fast food restaurants
Total market
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Gender of consumer
CONSUMER INSIGHT
Growing share of female consumers in chain restaurants and pubs. Women account for 56% of chain restaurant visits, up from 53% a year ago, and 50% in pub restaurants, up from 48% a year ago. While chain restaurants bias strongly towards female consumers compared to restaurants overall, fast food outlets and fine dining restaurants have a greater than average share of male consumers.
95
50% 50% 51% 51% 47% 44%49% 50% 53% 53% 52% 50% 53% 54%
50% 50% 49% 49% 53% 56%51% 50% 47% 47% 48% 50% 47% 46%
Q22015
Q22016
Q22015
Q22016
Q22015
Q22016
Q22015
Q22016
Q22015
Q22016
Q22015
Q22016
Q22015
Q22016
Female
Male
Gender profile % of meal visits – Q2 2016 vs. Q2 2015
Note: Data includes breakfast, lunch and dinner.
Total restaurants Chain restaurants Pub restaurantsFine dining restaurants
Independent restaurants
Fast food restaurants
Total market
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Combined household income per annum
CONSUMER INSIGHT
The consumer profile for restaurants is becoming more affluent. For all restaurant channels except fast food, there has been a growing share of visits accounted for by those living in households earning £40K or above per annum. As you would expect, fine dining restaurants have the most affluent consumer profile of all restaurant channels, while fast food consumers are most likely to live in households earning under £20k per annum.
96
28% 25% 28% 25% 23% 19%25% 22%
14% 17%
29% 25%31% 29%
40%40%
41%40%
39%38%
40%42%
38%37%
41%43%
41%37%
20%21%
20%21%
22%25%
21% 21%
26% 24%
20% 21%19%
21%
12% 14% 11% 14% 16% 18% 14% 16%22% 22%
10% 11% 9% 12%
Q22015
Q22016
Q22015
Q22016
Q22015
Q22016
Q22015
Q22016
Q22015
Q22016
Q22015
Q22016
Q22015
Q22016
Over £60K
£40-£60K
£20-£40K
Under £20K
Total restaurants Chain restaurants Pub restaurantsFine dining restaurants
Independent restaurants
Fast food restaurants
Total market
Combined household income profile % of meal visits – Q2 2016 vs. Q2 2015
Note: Data includes breakfast, lunch and dinner.
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Consumer mission (primary reason for eating out)
CONSUMER INSIGHT
Growing get together mission in chain and independent restaurants. A get together with friends or family is the key consumer mission for restaurants, particularly pubs in which it accounts for a quarter of meal visits. The importance of the get together mission has increased over the past year for chain and independent restaurants, rising 2pp and 4pp respectively. Fast food has a greater skew to treat missions and when the consumer can’t be bothered to cook.
97
16% 17% 19% 21% 19% 23% 19% 19%25% 25%
5% 6%
15% 14% 13%13% 15%
14%12% 12%
13% 12%
18% 18%
9% 9%5% 4% 7% 6%
1% 2%
6% 7%
15% 15%
8% 8%9% 10%
9% 9%
13% 14%
11% 11%
3% 3%
6% 6%7%
7% 4% 4%
1% 1%
4% 5%
8% 8%
6% 5% 9% 8% 7% 7%17% 18%
7% 6%
2% 2%
5% 5% 4% 3% 4% 5% 5% 4% 5% 7%
5% 5%
5% 5% 3% 2%5% 5% 3% 4% 5% 5%
6% 6%
4% 4%4% 4%
5% 4% 2%3%
5% 4%
4% 4%
5% 4%4% 4%
7% 5%4%
4%2% 1%
6% 5%
4% 4% 6% 6%
3% 3%3%
3% 3% 4%
3% 4%
3% 3% 1% 2%2% 2%
1% 0%2% 2%
5% 5%
3% 3% 2% 2%2% 2%
1% 1%2% 2%
4% 4%
3% 3% 2% 2%1% 1%
0% 1%
1% 1%6% 5%
2% 2% 3% 4% 1% 1%
2% 2%
2% 2% 2% 2%2% 2% 3% 2% 2% 2%
6% 6%2% 2% 2% 2%
7% 6% 7% 5% 7% 7% 9% 7% 6% 5% 6% 7%
Q22015
Q22016
Q22015
Q22016
Q22015
Q22016
Q22015
Q22016
Q22015
Q22016
Q22015
Q22016
Other
To have better quality food
Promotional offer
Work-based journey
Break from work/study
While shopping for groceries
At another leisure activity
Wanted specific type of food
Leisure-based journey
Part of regular routine
To wind down or relax
Special occasion
While doing other shopping
Spend time with partner
Not bothered to cook
Having a treat
Get together with friends orfamily
Total restaurants Chain restaurants Pub restaurantsFine dining restaurants
Independent restaurants
Fast food restaurants
Mission profile % of meal visits – Q2 2016 vs. Q2 2015
Note: Data includes breakfast, lunch and dinner.
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Consumer needs (reasons for choosing meal establishment)
CONSUMER INSIGHT
Food quality/taste is the most important consumer need for restaurants to deliver. The quality or taste of the food is a key reason for choosing a restaurant on two-fifths of visits, and has remained the most common consumer need over the last four quarters. Having been before/previous experience and cheap/inexpensive prices grew in importance slightly in the latest quarter, in the lead up to and immediate aftermath of the Brexit vote.
40%33%
29%22%22%
19%17%
14%14%13%
10%9%9%7%6%5%5%4%4%3%3%3%3%2%2%
Food quality/tasteBeen beforeGood value
Convenient - homeConvenient - otherCheap/inexpensive
Fast serviceAtmosphere
Wide menu choiceFriendly Service
RecommendationProduct freshness
Family friendlyConvenient - work
PromotionCleanliness
Healthy optionsNot national chain
Beverage qualityOutdoor areas
OtherLoyalty programme
Low noise levelsNo children
Additional facilities
40%33%
28%22%22%
19%17%
14%13%13%
10%9%9%8%7%5%5%4%4%3%3%3%2%2%2%
Food quality/tasteBeen beforeGood value
Convenient - otherConvenient - homeCheap/inexpensive
Fast serviceWide menu choice
AtmosphereFriendly Service
RecommendationFamily friendly
Product freshnessConvenient - work
PromotionCleanliness
Healthy optionsBeverage quality
Not national chainLow noise levels
Loyalty programmeNo children
Additional facilitiesOther
Outdoor areas
39%33%
28%22%21%
19%19%
14%14%14%
10%9%9%8%7%
5%4%4%4%3%2%2%2%2%2%
Food quality/tasteBeen beforeGood value
Convenient - homeConvenient - otherCheap/inexpensive
Fast serviceWide menu choice
AtmosphereFriendly Service
RecommendationFamily friendly
Product freshnessConvenient - work
PromotionCleanliness
Healthy optionsBeverage quality
Not national chainLow noise levels
Loyalty programmeNo children
OtherAdditional facilities
Outdoor areas
39%34%
28%21%21%20%
17%14%14%13%
10%9%9%8%7%5%4%4%4%3%3%2%2%2%2%
Food quality/tasteBeen beforeGood value
Convenient - otherConvenient - homeCheap/inexpensive
Fast serviceAtmosphere
Wide menu choiceFriendly Service
RecommendationProduct freshness
Family friendlyConvenient - work
PromotionCleanliness
Not national chainHealthy options
Beverage qualityOutdoor areas
Loyalty programmeLow noise levels
No childrenOther
Additional facilities
Q3 2015 Q2 2016Q1 2016Q4 2015
Needs profile % of meal visits (multiple choice up to 3 per visit) – Q3 2015-Q2 2016
Note: Data includes breakfast, lunch and dinner. No Q2 2015 data available due to changes in the questionnaire from Q3 2016 onwards.
98
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Consumer needs by restaurant channel
CONSUMER INSIGHT
Visitors choosing practical experience over perceptions of quality in pub restaurants. For chain restaurants, independent restaurants and fast food outlets, food quality/taste is key to attract customers, but been before/previous experience is most important for pub visitors. Over the past year, food quality has become slightly less important for pubs and independent restaurants, while been before/previous experience is accounting for a growing share of visits.
Needs profile % of meal visits (multiple choice up to 3 per visit) Q3 2015-Q2 2016
44%
34%
23%
12%
18%
39%
34%
24%
12%
17%
42%
35%
24%
13%
16%
43%
34%
24%
14%
14%
Food quality/taste
Been before
Good value
Recommendation
Wide menu choice
50%
36%
24%
17%
20%
51%
37%
23%
18%
20%
49%
37%
24%
18%
17%
49%
37%
23%
19%
17%
Food quality/taste
Been before
Good value
Food safety/cleanliness
Convenient - to work
35%
37%
33%
8%
24%
36%
36%
33%
9%
22%
36%
35%
33%
9%
23%
37%
36%
31%
9%
22%
Been before
Good value
Food quality/taste
Fast service
Convenient - other
38%
36%
28%
24%
24%
37%
34%
29%
24%
23%
36%
38%
28%
25%
23%
37%
35%
29%
26%
22%
Food quality/taste
Fast service
Been before
Cheap/inexpensiveprices
Convenient - to home
Biggest fall: Biggest fall:Biggest fall:Biggest fall:
Biggest growth: Biggest growth:Biggest growth:Biggest growth:
Q3 2015Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016
Note: Data includes breakfast, lunch and dinner. No Q2 2015 data available due to changes in the questionnaire from Q3 2016 onwards..
Most important: Most important: Most important: Most important:
99
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Key performance indicator scores
CONSUMER INSIGHT
Chains driving greater appeal for freshness, family friendliness, low prices and ethical practices/products. Average customer scores for chain restaurants in freshness, family friendliness, low prices and ethical practices/products all increased slightly by 0.1 points over the past year. Scores for ethical practices/products rose in all restaurant channels and for family friendliness in all but independent and pub restaurants. Independent restaurants achieved slight gains in freshness and cleanliness, pubs in fast and friendly service and for their convenient locations.
8.4
8.4
8.7
8.9
8.4
8.1
Total restaurants
Chains
Independents
Fine dining
Pubs
Fast food
8.1
7.9
8.2
8.2
8.3
7.9
8.2
8.2
8.4
8.6
8.2
8.0
8.3
8.4
8.6
8.8
8.5
7.9
Total restaurants
Chains
Independents
Fine dining
Pubs
Fast food
8.3
8.3
8.4
8.7
8.4
7.9
8.4
8.3
8.7
8.8
8.4
8.1
Food quality/taste Value for money Menu choice
Friendly service Drink quality/taste Overall experience
-0.1
-0.1
-0.1
-0.1
-0.1
-0.2
-0.1
+0.1
8.0
8.1
8.3
8.7
8.2
7.5
8.5
8.5
8.6
8.4
8.6
8.4
Atmosphere/environment
Convenient location
+0.1
+0.1
8.1
8.0
8.3
8.4
8.1
8.0
8.3
8.3
8.6
8.8
8.3
7.9
Speed of service
Cleanliness
8.3
8.4
8.7
8.9
8.3
8.0
8.1
8.1
8.1
7.9
8.1
8.0
Freshness
Family friendly
+0.1
+0.1
+0.1
+0.1
+0.1
+0.1
+0.1
+0.1
+0.1
+0.1
7.7
7.4
7.6
7.1
7.9
7.7
7.5
7.5
7.7
8.1
7.5
7.3
Ethical practices/products
+0.1
+0.1
+0.1
+0.1
+0.1
Low prices
+0.3
+0.1
+0.1
Average customer scores for key performance indicators (average out of 10) – Q2 2016 Change vs. Q2 2015
Note: Data includes breakfast, lunch and dinner.
100
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Burger (standard) 30.6%
Chicken (fast food) 18.0%
Burger (premium)8.6%
Ice cream 7.5%
Fish & chips 6.9%
Pizza3.3%
Wrap2.8%
Apple tart 2.2%
Apple pie 2.2%
Baguette2.1%
Fish & chips 13.2%
Roast 9.3%
Steak6.7%
Chicken dish 6.5%
Burger (premium) 6.5%
Ice cream 5.5%
Burger (standard) 3.9%
Cheesecake 3.5%
Fish dish 3.2%
Baguette2.6%
Fish dish 13.1%
Chicken dish 11.1%
Steak8.5%
Ice cream6.5%
Pizza 6.5%
Cheesecake6.5%
Seafood dish 5.9%
Roast 5.2%
Crème brulee 5.2%
Curry3.9%
Pizza 14.2%
Chicken dish 10.5%
Pasta9.9%
Ice cream 7.6%
Burger (premium)5.6%
Fish & chips 4.1%
Steak3.3%
Cheesecake 3.3%
Burger (standard) 3.1%
Roast3.0%
Sandwich12.7%
Burger (standard)6.8%
Fish & chips 6.0%
Baguette5.0%
Chicken (fast food)3.7%
Ice cream 3.7%
Burger (premium)3.4%
Chicken dish 3.2%
Cake3.0%
Salad2.9%
Food incidence: Q2 2016
CONSUMER INSIGHT
A standard burger is the most common lunch item to be consumed in a restaurant. A standard burger is consumed on 12% of restaurant lunch visits and 31% in fast food, compared to just 7% in the total Eating Out market. Fish & chips is the 2nd most popular lunch dish in restaurants and the most popular in independents and pubs.
Total market Total restaurants Chains Independents Fine dining Pubs Fast food
Top 10 lunch food items, incidence % of visits – Q2 2016
Burger (standard)12.4%
Fish & chips 9.1%
Chicken (fast food)6.8%
Ice cream 6.2%
Burger (premium) 6.2%
Chicken dish5.1%
Roast 4.0%
Pizza 3.7%
Steak3.2%
Sandwich2.7%
Fish & chips 8.8%
Chicken dish5.8%
Curry5.2%
Sandwich5.1%
Ice cream 4.6%
Pizza4.3%
Pasta 3.7%
Vegetarian dish 3.7%
Fish dish 3.4%
Cake3.1%
1
2
3
4
5
6
10
9
8
7
101
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Fish & chips 20.4%
Chicken (fast food) 18.0%
Burger (standard) 17.3%
Pizza11.7%
Ice cream 5.4%
Burger (premium) 4.9%
Chicken dish 4.0%
Kebab 3.3%
Curry2.2%
Chicken dish 1.9%
Steak13.1%
Chicken dish 13.1%
Fish & chips10.4%
Burger (premium) 8.0%
Ice cream 7.6%
Roast7.0%
Beef dish 6.7%
Fish dish 4.4%
Soup4.4%
Cheesecake4.3%
Chicken dish 20.0%
Pizza 19.4%
Bread10.1%
Ice cream9.0%
Pasta 9.0%
Burger (premium) 6.3%
Cheesecake5.9%
Steak 4.5%
Chicken dish 4.5%
Seafood dish 4.3%
Chicken dish 11.5%
Fish & chips9.7%
Pizza6.8%
Ice cream6.4%
Burger (standard) 6.0%
Steak6.0%
Curry5.7%
Burger (premium)5.3%
Beef dish 5.0%
Chicken (fast food)5.0%
Food incidence: Q2 2016
CONSUMER INSIGHT
Chicken dish most popular for dinner in restaurants. 12.3% of restaurant visits involve a chicken dish and levels rise to 15.3% in independent restaurants and 20% in chains. Steak is the top dish in fine dining and pub restaurants, consumed at 13.8% and 13.1% of visits respectively. Fish & Chips is the key dinner dish in fast food outlets, accounting for 20.4% of visits.
Top 10 dinner food items, incidence % of visits – Q2 2016
Total market Total restaurants Chains Independents Fine dining Pubs Fast food
Chicken dish12.3%
Fish & chips 10.2%
Pizza7.5%
Ice cream 7.0%
Steak6.5%
Burger (standard) 6.2%
Curry6.1%
Burger (premium)5.4%
Chicken (fast food) 5.3%
Beef dish 4.9%
Chicken dish 15.3%
Curry 14.4%
Pizza6.8%
Ice cream 6.5%
Fish & chips 6.3%
Fish dish 5.9%
Seafood dish 5.8%
Chicken dish 5.7%
Beef dish 5.6%
Soup5.2%
Steak13.8%
Chicken dish 11.6%
Fish dish 11.3%
Soup10.1%
Seafood dish 9.9%
Lamb dish 8.9%
Ice cream8.1%
Beef dish 7.6%
Bread6.4%
Curry6.2%
1
2
3
4
5
6
10
9
8
7
102
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Cola 27.6%
Diet cola 15.4%
Coffee9.2%
Bottled water – still 6.7%
Milkshake/milk drink 5.9%
Lemonade 5.3%
Tea 3.4%
Bottled water – sparkling 2.3%
Fruit juice 2.3%
Diet lemonade1.6%
Beer/cider 27.6%
Wine 13.6%
Diet cola 10.4%
Cola 10.3%
Coffee8.5%
Bottled water – still 4.4%
Juice drink 4.1%
Tap water 3.5%
Tea 3.0%
Lemonade 2.8%
Wine32.7%
Bottled water – still 13.7%
Cola 13.1%
Tap water 11.8%
Diet cola 9.8%
Coffee9.2%
Bottled water – sparkling 9.2%
Beer/cider5.2%
Juice drink 4.6%
Spirits/cocktails4.6%
Coffee 17.5%
Tea 13.0%
Wine11.1%
Bottled water – still10.3%
Diet cola 9.4%
Cola 8.0%
Beer/cider 7.9%
Tap water 7.2%
Bottled water – sparkling 4.5%
Fruit juice 3.6%
Diet cola15.0%
Cola 14.0%
Wine11.0%
Tap water 10.4%
Coffee 7.6%
Bottled water – still 6.9%
Beer/cider 6.1%
Lemonade 5.1%
Bottled water – sparkling 4.8%
Tea 3.3%
Cola 16.2%
Diet cola 12.4%
Beer/cider 11.9%
Coffee 10.4%
Wine8.8%
Bottled water – still 6.8%
Tea5.1%
Tap water 4.1%
Lemonade4.0%
Bottled water – sparkling 3.1%
Coffee16.1%
Cola 12.0%
Diet cola 10.1%
Bottled water – still 8.8%
Tea 8.0%
Beer/cider6.4%
Wine4.9%
Tap water 3.7%
Bottled water – sparkling3.1%
Lemonade2.8%
Drink incidence: Q2 2016
CONSUMER INSIGHT
Cola is the No. 1 restaurant lunch drink. 16% of lunch visits to restaurants involve cola, which is particularly key within fast food outlets where it is consumed on 28% of visits. In chain restaurants, diet cola accounts for 15% of lunch visits, ahead of regular cola on 14%. Beer/cider is most popular with lunch in pubs and wine in fine dining restaurants.
Top 10 drinks with lunch, incidence % of visits – Q2 2016
Total market Total restaurants Chains Independents Fine dining Pubs Fast food
1
2
3
4
5
6
10
9
8
7
103
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Cola22.3%
Diet cola 12.1%
Bottled water – still 5.0%
Beer/cider4.6%
Coffee 4.5%
Tea 4.1%
Milkshake/milk drink4.0%
Lemonade 3.6%
Bottled water – sparkling 2.9%
Wine 2.6%
Beer/cider 33.2%
Wine 20.7%
Cola 9.4%
Diet cola 9.2%
Coffee 5.0%
Juice drink4.4%
Tap water 4.3%
Spirits/cocktails 3.3%
Lemonade 2.8%
Bottled water – still 2.4%
Wine45.3%
Beer/cider 16.5%
Bottled water – still 10.1%
Spirits/cocktails9.4%
Tap water 9.1%
Cola6.2%
Coffee 5.7%
Bottled water – sparkling 5.7%
Diet cola 4.2%
Juice drink 3.2%
Wine27.6%
Beer/cider 20.4%
Cola 8.8%
Tap water 7.3%
Bottled water – still 6.8%
Coffee6.0%
Diet cola 5.9%
Spirits/cocktails 3.6%
Fruit juice 3.5%
Tea3.5%
Wine17.9%
Cola 15.5%
Beer/cider14.5%
Diet cola 13.5%
Tap water 8.5%
Bottled water – still 5.2%
Coffee 4.7%
Lemonade 4.6%
Spirits/cocktails4.0%
Juice drink 3.5%
Beer/cider 19.7%
Wine 19.1%
Cola13.0%
Diet cola9.4%
Tap water 5.3%
Coffee5.1%
Bottled water – still 5.0%
Lemonade 3.3%
Juice drink 3.3%
Spirits/cocktails3.1%
Beer/cider18.1%
Wine 17.9%
Cola 12.5%
Diet cola 9.2%
Coffee 5.9%
Bottled water – still 5.8%
Tap water 5.2%
Lemonade 3.4%
Juice drink 3.3%
Bottled water – sparkling 3.1%
Drink incidence: Q2 2016
CONSUMER INSIGHT
Beer/cider and wine are the key drinks in restaurants at dinner. Wine is the top dinner drink in chain restaurants, independent restaurants and fine dining restaurants, but in pubs beer/cider is most important, drunk with a third of all evening meals. A soft drink is only the No. 1 in fast food, where Cola is most popular, consumed on 14% of dinner visits.
Top 10 drinks with dinner, incidence % of visits – Q2 2016
Total market Total restaurants Chains Independents Fine dining Pubs Fast food
1
2
3
4
5
6
10
9
8
7
104
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
CONSUMER INSIGHT
Growth in all key metrics for chain restaurants: More customers, visiting more often and paying
more on each visit.
Chain restaurants – drivers of performance
70.8% 73.4%
Q2 2015 Q2 2016
1.3 1.5
£6.37£12.67
£19.60
£7.05£13.42
£19.92
Breakfast Lunch Dinner
Change drivers
47% 44%
53% 56%
Q2 2015 Q2 2016
Female
Male
16% 14%
20% 22%
30% 31%
34% 32%
Q2 2015 Q2 2016
50+35-4925-3418-24
23% 19%
39% 38%
22% 25%
16% 18%
Q2 2015 Q2 2016
Over £60K£40-£60K£20-£40KUnder £20K
25-49s, women and affluent visitors drive visit growth: 56% of visitors now women,
53% 25-49 and 43% earning £40k+.
18%
13%
20%
15%
Get togetherwith friends or
family
Having a treat
25-49s Change drivers
Missions – % of visits 8.2
7.9
7.9
8.2
8.4
8.1
8.1
8.4
Freshness
Family friendly
Ethical practices/products
Food quality/taste
KPI scores (avg. out of 10)
Needs10%
11%
12%
11%
15%
9%
13%
13%
Cheap/inepensive
Productfreshness
Q3 2015
Q4 2015
Q1 2016
Q2 2016
Family visits (w/kids)
34%36%
£40k+ Change drivers
16%
9%
18%
12%
Get together withfriends or family
Time with partner
Missions – % of visits
KPI scores (avg. out of 10)7.3 8.5 7.9 8.3 8.1 8.37.5 8.6 8.0 8.4 8.2 8.4
Ethicalpractices
Conv.location
Familyfriendly
Foodquality/
taste
Drinkquality/
taste
Freshness
More informal social occasions, especially with family: Improvements in quality, freshness, ethical practices and family friendliness encouraging more informal get-togethers and family treat occasions.
Age - % of visits
Gender - % of visits
Total household income - % of visits
Note: Profile data includes breakfast, lunch and dinner. Change drivers shown selected based on greatest year on year change.
105
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
CONSUMER INSIGHT
Positive period for pub restaurants: Pubs competing strongly on meal visits, with growing
participation, frequency and average spend.
Pub restaurants – drivers of performance
85.0% 85.8%
Q2 2015 Q2 2016
1.8 2.0
£5.58
£11.32
£16.65
£6.11
£11.84
£17.21
Breakfast Lunch Dinner
Change drivers
52% 50%
48% 50%
Q2 2015 Q2 2016
Female
Male
70% 68%
30% 32%
Q2 2015 Q2 2016
£40K+
Under £40K
Pubs growing appeal to female customers and those earning higher
incomes: Half of pub restaurant meal visitors are now women, while the
proportion earning £40k+ per annum has also increased.
Female Change drivers
Missions – % of visits
Needs – % of visits
£40k+ Change drivers
Missions – % of visits
KPI scores (avg. out of 10)8.27 8.11 7.248.34 8.18 7.32
Friendly service Cleanliness Ethical practices/products
Low tempo ‘wind down’ missions gaining popularity in pubs: Consumers increasingly
choosing pubs they have been to before, with good service and a clean environment, where they will
be able to wind down and relax.
Gender - % of visits
Total household income - % of visits
4%
6%Wind down or relax
35%
11%
36%
13%
38%
14%
39%
13%
Beenbefore
FriendlyService
Q3 2015
Q4 2015
Q1 2016
Q2 2016
6%
3%
8%
4%
Wind downor relax
At anotherleisureactivity
31%
7%
32%
10%
34%
9%
34%
10%
Beenbefore
Fastservice
Q3 2015
Q4 2015
Q1 2016
Q2 2016
Needs – % of visits
Note: Profile data includes breakfast, lunch and dinner. Change drivers shown selected based on greatest year on year change.
106
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
CONSUMER INSIGHT
39.1%
40.6%
£20-40k
19% 23%
Average spend rising fastest in independent restaurants: 11% overall rise in average meal spend is unmatched, while participation and frequency have also increased.
Independent restaurants – drivers of performance
75.6% 77.8%
Q2 2015 Q2 2016
1.4 1.6
£5.74£9.91
£19.47
£6.35£11.34
£20.93
Breakfast Lunch Dinner
Change drivers
Growing get together occasion driving more and higher spend visits: Almost a quarter of all independent restaurant
occasions are now sociable get-togethers.
Get together Change drivers
KPI scores (avg. out of 10)8.56 7.46 8.57 8.508.74 7.57 8.65 8.57
Convenientlocation
Low prices Menu choice Drinkquality/taste
25-34s, women and mid-income consumers visiting for price and value-led occasions: Despite average spend rises,
independent restaurants are increasingly chosen for get-togethers due to low prices and good value.
Mission:Get together with friends or family -% of visits
Needs – % of visits
13.0%
14.4%
25-34
Age – % of visits
Income – % of visits
22%
8%
24%
9%
23%
9%
26%
12%
Good value
Cheap/inexpensive
Q3 2015
Q4 2015
Q1 2016
Q2 2016
61.4%
62.1%
Female
Gender – % of visits
Note: Profile data includes breakfast, lunch and dinner. Change drivers shown selected based on greatest year on year change.
107
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
CONSUMER INSIGHT
38% 36%
62% 64%
Q2 2015 Q2 2016
35+
18-34
31% 29%
41% 37%
19% 21%
9% 12%
Q2 2015 Q2 2016
Over £60K£40-£60K£20-£40KUnder £20K
Participation and frequency down for fast food: Fewer consumers visiting and those who do are visiting less often, but average spend has risen.
Fast food – drivers of performance
75.1% 71.9%
Q2 2015 Q2 2016
2.1 2.0
£4.17 £5.73£9.26
£4.56 £6.30£10.06
Breakfast Lunch Dinner
Causes of
decline
Millennials and less affluent consumers causing decrease in fast food visits: Consumers aged 18-34 account for a
falling share of visits to fast food outlets, as do those earning under £40k per
annum.
Age - % of visits
Total household income - % of visits
Fewer visits for the specific cuisine and quality of food on offer: Among 18-34s and less affluent
customers, fewer are choosing a fast food outlet for a particular type of food – with independents (e.g. fish & chips, kebab shops) some of the hardest hit.
Change drivers
Needs – % of visits
38%
40%
36%
36%
Foodquality/
taste
Q3 2015
Q4 2015
Q1 2016
Q2 2016
7.0%
3.7%
4.7%
2.6%
Wanted a specificcuisine
Because I had to
Missions – % of visits
6.6%
5.4%
Wanted aspecific cuisine
Missions – % of visits
Needs – % of visits
24%
23%
23%
23%
Convenientlocation - to
home
Q3 2015
Q4 2015
Q1 2016
Q2 2016
18-34 Change drivers
Under £40K
Changedrivers
Note: Profile data includes breakfast, lunch and dinner. Change drivers shown selected based on greatest year on year change.
108
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
CONSUMER INSIGHT
Contemporary chains – Y/E June 2016
5.1% 6.7%
Q2 2015 Q2 2016
Contemporary chains playing key role in restaurant growth. 18-24s and more affluent consumers are being attracted into modern chains by the food quality and environment. Contemporary brands have greater appeal on special occasions and celebrations, but less so for treats and family visits.
4.0%6.6%
% share of total chain restaurant visits
WHO?
44% 42%
56% 58% Female
Male
14% 18%21% 18%31% 32%
34% 32% 50+
35-49
25-34
18-24
20% 18%
39% 32%
25% 28%16% 22%
Total chains Contemp. chains
Over £60K£40-£60K£20-£40KUnder £20K
MISSIONS?
21% 22%
9%18%
9%
8%7%
7%12%7%7%6%4%4%4% 3%4% 3%2% 3%2% 3%4% 2%4% 2%
11% 11%
Total chains Contemp. chains
Other
Leisure-based journey
Discount/promotion
Try something new
Better quality food
Wanted specific cuisine
Not bothered to cook
Wind down or relax
Doing other shopping
Having a treat
At other leisure activity
Time with my partner
Special occasion/celebration
Get together
NEEDS?43%
34%
17%
24%
14%
24%
17%
15%
12%
10%
16%
6%
3%
11%
11%
11%
7%
54%
34%
28%
25%
20%
20%
14%
14%
14%
11%
11%
6%
6%
6%
6%
5%
3%
Food quality/taste
Been before
Nice environment
Convenient - other
Recommendation
Good value
Wide menu choice
Convenient - to home
Friendly Service
Product freshness
Voucher/promotion
Convenient - to work
Drink quality/taste
Cheap/inexpensive
Fast service
Family friendly
Healthy food options
Totalchains
Contemp.chainsWHO WITH?
7% 7%34% 34%
33% 30%
22% 23%3% 6%
Total chains Contemp. chains
Other
ColleaguesFriendsFamilyPartner
Alone
25%
16%With kids
Total chains
Contemp. chains
PROMOTIONS?
27%
16%On promotion
Total chains
Contemp. chains
Contemporary Chains = opened in past 10 years
Note: All data is from the year ending June 2016 combining lunch and dinner, except for the share of visits data from Q2 2016 vs. Q2 2015 and split by day-part.
109
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
CONSUMER INSIGHT
Demographics by cuisine type in chain restaurantsBritish and French cuisines attract an older consumer, Asian, South American and French are more appealing for women. Over half of British and French cuisine consumers are aged 50 or above, compared to just a third in total chain restaurants. 62% of Asian, South American and French cuisine consumers are women, compared to 56% in chain restaurants on average. South American consumers are the highest earners, with a third making £60k+.
14% 3%19% 21% 16% 7% 13% 26% 19%
21%13%
23% 21% 26%14%
18%
36%35%
31%
28%
34% 34% 40%
28%32%
26%27%
34%57%
24% 24% 18%51%
36%12% 19% 50+
35-49
25-34
18-24
20% 10% 21% 20% 25% 23% 17% 14% 16%
39% 52% 42% 39% 22% 35% 37% 29% 36%
25% 24% 24%16%
20%20% 28% 34% 28%
16% 14% 13% 25% 33% 21% 19% 23% 19%Over £60K
£40-£60K
£20-£40K
Under£20K
Gender, age and total household income profiles % of meal visits – Year to end of June 2016
Total British American S.American French Italian Japanese MexicanPan-Asian
Note: All data is from the year ending June 2016 combining lunch and dinner.
44% 43% 43% 38% 38% 38% 43% 44% 46%
56% 57% 57% 62% 62% 62% 57% 56% 54% Female
Male
110
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
15% 14% 12%17%
12%18% 16%
10% 12%
11% 19%14%
11%16%
13%11%
8%8%
11%8%
10%15%
8%11%
10%
16% 11%
8%8%
9%
11%
10%6%
7% 13%12%
5%4%
5%
5%
2%4%
6% 4% 7%
5% 5% 5%
4%
7%7%
4% 4% 3%
5%9%
5%
4%
4%6%
5% 5% 6%
5%
3%
4%
2%
6%5%
4%2%
5%4%
5%
4%5%
2%
5%
4%2%
2%4%
5%
5%
5%
3%
4%
4%
2%4%
4%
6%
4%
2%
5%
1%3%
4%2%
4%
2%
4%3%
6% 0%3%
9% 5%
4%0%
4%3%
2% 3% 4% 4% 3%
3%4%
3%4%
2% 3% 3% 2% 4%
3%3%
2%1%
4% 1% 5% 4% 1%
3%1%
4%4%
0% 4% 2% 4%3%
2%2%
1%1%
2%4% 3% 2% 4%
2%2%
1%1%
5% 1% 2% 3% 4%2% 0%
3% 1% 2% 2% 2% 4% 1%2% 0% 2% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 3% Other
Business meeting/meal
To try something new
Had to
To have better quality food
Promotion
Work-based journey
Wind down or relax
Wanted a specific cuisine
Grocery shopping
Special occasion
Leisure-based journey
Not bothered to cook
At another leisure activity
Spend time with partner
Part of regular routine
Work/study break
Having a treat
Doing other shopping
Get together
CONSUMER INSIGHT
Total British American S.American French Italian Japanese MexicanPan-Asian
Missions by cuisine type in chain restaurantsShopping trips are most important for British cuisine, whereas French, Asian and Italian are eaten on more sociable missions. A fifth of British food is eaten by consumers out shopping, which is also the main mission for South American cuisine. 18% of French, 17% of Asian and 16% of Italian meals respectively are eaten on get together occasions. Japanese food is most likely to be chosen for a treat and also more often picked due to a desire for the specific type of food than other cuisines.
Mission profile % of meal visits – Year to end of June 2016
Note: All data is from the year ending June 2016 combining lunch and dinner.
111
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
CONSUMER INSIGHT
Total
Food quality37%
Been before32%
Good value27%
Close to other*26%
Cheap/inexpensive17%
Fast service17%
Close to work16%
Atmosphere14%
Close to home13%
Wide choice13%
Food quality32% (87)
Been before32% (100)
Close to other*31% (120)
Good value29% (105)
Cheap/inexpensive17% (99)
Close to work15% (98)
Close to home15% (110)
Atmosphere15% (104)
Friendly service14% (121)
Fast service13% (79)
Food quality36% (95)
Been before34% (106)
Good value26% (94)
Close to other*25% (99)
Fast service20% (119)
Close to work17% (106)
Cheap/inexpensive16% (92)
Close to home 15% (111)
Atmosphere15% (105)
Wide choice14% (108)
Food quality48% (128)
Been before29% (92)
Good value26% (96)
Close to other*24% (93)
Cheap/inexpensive19% (108)
Wide choice18% (143)
Fast service16% (92)
Close to work15% (99)
Recommendation14% (144)
Freshness13% (131)
Food quality44% (120)
Been before27% (86)
Good value24% (90)
Wide choice21% (170)
Close to work18% (117)
Close to home16% (120)
Fast service15% (90)
Atmosphere15% (107)
Close to other*15% (57)
Recommendation12% (127)
Food quality41% (111)
Been before35% (111)
Close to other*28% (109)
Good value24% (89)
Atmosphere18% (127)
Close to work17% (106)
Recommendation16% (172)
Promotion15% (153)
Close to home14% (104)
Friendly service14% (118)
Food quality37% (100)
Been before33% (105)
Freshness20% (199)
Fast service20% (114)
Close to work19% (124)
Healthy options19% (222)
Cheap/inexpensive18% (105)
Close to other*18% (70)
Good value18% (64)
Close to home12% (88)
Food quality37% (100)
Been before31% (98)
Good value24% (89)
Atmosphere22% (155)
Close to other*21% (83)
Cheap/inexpensive19% (109)
Close to work19% (120)
Fast service18% (104)
Wide choice14% (110)
Recommendation12% (122)
Food quality39% (105)
Been before31% (98)
Close to other*27% (105)
Good value26% (94)
Fast service16% (95)
Promotion16% (167)
Close to work16% (102)
Atmosphere15% (109)
Cheap/inexpensive14% (82)
Close to home13% (94)
Needs by cuisine type in chain restaurantsFood quality is the most common consumer need for all the major cuisine types. Food quality accounts for the greatest share of visits for each of the major cuisine types within chain restaurants, especially Asian food, selected for its quality on 48% of visits. American cuisine consumers skew to choosing a place they have been to before, while British cuisine over-indexes for good value relative to the average for chain restaurants. Good value is least important for Japanese cuisine, for which freshness is relatively more important, accounting for a fifth of visits.
1
2
3
4
5
6
9
8
7
Top 10 consumer needs, % of visits and index relative to chain restaurants – Year to end of June 2016
10
British American S.American French Italian Japanese MexicanPan-Asian
Note: All data is from the year ending June 2016 combining lunch and dinner. *Close to other refers to a convenient location other than work or home.
Index ≤ 80 Index ≥ 120
112
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Contents
Introduction and background
Executive summary
Market
Competitive landscape
Consumer insight
Consumer typology analysis
Section summary
Customer typology overview
Customer profile types
Bespoke consumer research
Future outlook
113
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Section summary
114
MCA divides eating out customers into nine segments based on age, social grades and if they have children in the household. The nine segments include three Millennial segments (the Explorers, the New Parents and the Home Builders), four Generation X segments (Established Families, Humble Householders, Aspiring Child Free and Functional Child Free) and two Grey Pound segments (Greying Generation and Golden Oldies).
Millennials and Established Families are the most valuable customers.• Three Millennial segments (18-34s) account for 29% of UK adult
population but represent 46% of the total visits and 43% of the total expenditure in the restaurant market.
• Established Families (ABC1 35-54, children at home) account for 10% of adult population but contribute 14 % of total visits and 14% of total expenditure.
• 55+ account for 36% of adult population however only contribute 18% of the total visits and 21% of the total expenditure.
The Explorers have a big budget and appetite for specific cuisines.• While all the other customer segments spend the most when have
special occasions or celebrations, the Explorers spend the most when on a mission to have a specific cuisine.
• ‘Want a specific cuisine’ is the joint fourth most important mission (6%) for the Explorers, 1pp higher than the average. Developing and advertising authentic minority cuisines is a key opportunity to encourage the Explorers to visit more often and spend more per visit.
• The Explorers(18-24s) are the most adventurous customers. They have the greatest consideration set for each visit. Promoting through social media, email contact lists and digital coupons are effective ways to target and persuade this tech-savvy generation to visit.
The New Parents are the most foodie parents ever• The parents (25-34s, with children at home) have the highest eating
out frequency across all generations. On average, they visit the restaurant market 157 times per annual for breakfast, lunch, dinner and snacking.
• Being New Parents, family friendliness is now one of the most important needs. Developing family friendly service and facilities are important selling points.
Contemporary brands are winning Millennials and Aspiring Child Free.• The Millennials’ eating out repertoires strongly over-index for
contemporary brands – Turtle Bay, Nando’s and YO! Sushi for the Explorers; BrewDog, Wasabi, Wahaca, Itsu, Five Guys and YO! Sushi for the Home Builders (25-34s, with no children at home) and Chimichanga and Wacky Warehouse for the New Parents.
• Aspiring Child Free (35-54 ABC1, with no children at home) are over-represented for the more premium contemporary brands, including Côte, Wahaca, Itsu and GBK.
Special occasions and celebrations drive the highest spend. • Customers aged over 25, either ABC1 or C2DE, having children at home or
not, all spend the highest when eating out for special occasions or celebrations. This indicates an opportunity to dig the customer pockets deeper with appropriate celebration offers.
• For all customers aged over 25, the mission for spending the second highest is to spend time with their partners. Nice environment and friendly service are important to enhance customers’ dining experiences and encourage repeat visits.
Notes: age range for the three broad segments – Millennials (18-34s), Generation Y (35-54s), Grey Pound (55+).
CONSUMER TYPOLOGY ANALYSIS
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Contents
Introduction and background
Executive summary
Market
Competitive landscape
Consumer insight
Consumer typology analysis
Section summary
Customer typology overview
Customer profile types
Bespoke consumer research
Future outlook
115
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Customer segmentation – demographics and spendMillennial segments and the ABC1 35-54 with kids are the most valuable restaurant customers*. These four segments account for 57% of total implied expenditure despite only a 39% share of the total adult population.
116
DEMOGRAPHICS
Age
Social grade
Kids at home
18-24
No limit
No limit
25-34
No limit
Have kids
25-34
No limit
No children
35-54
ABC1
Have kids
35-54
C2DE
Have kids
35-54
ABC1
No children
35-54
C2DE
No children
55-65
No limit
No limit
65+
No limit
No limit
Notes: *Restaurant customers: customers who have visit fast food, pubs, branded restaurants, local independent restaurants and fine dining for breakfast, lunch, dinner or snacking. **UK adult population: based on ONS most recently released data - population and age group (2014), social grade (2011) and children dependent in household(2011). ***Implied annual restaurant market spend is an estimated UK adult spend (inc. tax) at fast food, branded restaurants, independent restaurants and fine dining across all day-parts.N.B. ‘have kids’ means having children (under 18) in the household; ‘no children’ refers to customers who either have no children in the household or have children but over 18.
% OF UK ADULTPOPULATION**(50.9million)
12%(5.9m)
7%(3.6m)
10% (5.1m)
10%(4.9m)
8%(4.2m)
9%(4.6m)
8%(3.9m)
14% (7.4m)
22% (11.4m)
IMPLIED ANNUAL RESTAURANTMARKET SPEND***(£45.3b)
16%(£7.0b)
13%(£6.1b)
14% (£6.2b)
14%(£6.4b)
7%(£3.2b)
10%(£4.4b)
6%(£2.5b)
10% (£4.5b)
11% (£5.0b)
CONSUMER TYPOLOGY ANALYSIS
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Customer segmentation – frequency and average spend
117
Notes: *UK adult population: based on ONS most recently released data - population and age group (2014), social grade (2011) and children dependent in household(2011). **Implied annual restaurant market spend is an estimated UK adult spend (inc. tax) at fast food, branded restaurants, independent restaurants and fine dining across all day-parts.N.B. visit frequency is the average annual visits to fast food outlets, branded restaurants, independent restaurants and fine dining restaurants for breakfast, lunch, dinner and snacking (it excludes visits to cafés, supermarkets, workplaces, hotels, etc.); Average spend is the average spend per head per restaurant market visit, including breakfast, lunch, dinner and snacking.
% OF UK ADULTPOPULATION*(50.9million)
12%(5.9m)
7%(3.6m)
10% (5.1m)
10%(4.9m)
8%(4.2m)
9%(4.6m)
8%(3.9m)
14% (7.4m)
22% (11.4m)
Visit frequency(Annual res mkt visits per person)
132(159)
178(214)
117(141)
121(146)
82(98)
82(99)
68(82)
54(64)
35(42)
Average spend(p/h per visit) £9.05
(84)
£9.38(88)
£10.50(98)
£10.79(101)
£9.45(88)
£11.71(109)
£9.60(90)
£11.47(107)
£12.64(118)
16%(£7.0b)
13%(£6.1b)
14% (£6.2b)
14%(£6.4b)
7%(£3.2b)
10%(£4.4b)
6%(£2.5b)
10% (£4.5b)
11% (£5.0b)
Millennial parents eat out most frequently. The new parents visit fast food, pubs, branded and independent restaurants 178 times for breakfast, lunch, dinner or snacking in a year. Golden oldies have the highest average spend per head per occasion, however they eat out least frequently at only 35 times a year.
IMPLIED ANNUAL RES MKT SPEND** (£45.3b)
Nat. avg = 83 (100)
Nat. avg =£10.71 (100)
CONSUMER TYPOLOGY ANALYSIS
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Customer segmentation – segment expenditure by channelStrong branded restaurant skew for the M segments. UK adults spend £45.3 billion on restaurants in MAT June 2016. 15% of total expenditure goes to branded restaurants, with all three M segments strongly over-indexing. Fast food is broadly appealing to customers under 55 years old. Overall 30% of total expenditure goes to pub restaurants, with 35-54 no kids and 55+ in particular, strongly over-indexing.
118
30%24% 24% 26% 27% 32% 33% 36% 40% 44%
24%
17% 19%26% 23%
19%28% 23%
29%30%
23%
31%32%
22% 28% 31% 16% 25%15% 8%
14%20% 16% 17% 14%
13%14%
11% 10% 10%
8% 9% 10% 9% 8% 5% 9% 5% 7% 9%Fine dining
Brandedrestaurant
Fast food
Independentrestaurant
Pub restaurant
Total customers
IMPLIED ANNUAL
RESTAURANT MARKET SPEND*
BY SEGMENT
£7.0b £6.1b £6.2b £6.4b £3.2b £4.4b £2.5b £4.5b £5.0b£45.3b
Notes: *Implied annual restaurant market spend is a calculated total restaurant expenditure for UK adults in the restaurant market (including fast food outlets, chain restaurants, independent restaurants and fine dining restaurants) across all day-parts (breakfast, lunch, dinner and snacking). It excludes expenditure from specific segments that are excluded in the MCA Eating Out Panel consumer research, in particular children and tourists.
CONSUMER TYPOLOGY ANALYSIS
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Customer segmentation – the expenditure matrix The Explorers are the most important contributors for fast food and chain restaurants. The Explorers spend £2.1b at fast food, accounting for 20% of the fast food outlet revenue. The Explorers also spend £1.4b on chain restaurants, accounting for 22% of the total revenue at this channel. Golden Oldies spend the most at pub restaurants and local restaurants.
119
£7.0b(16%)
£6.1b(13%)
£6.2b(14%)
£6.4b(14%)
£3.2b(7%)
£4.4b(10%)
£2.5b(6%)
£4.5b(10%)
£5.0b(11%)
£13.8b(30%)
£10.7b(24%)
£10.6b(23%)
£6.5b(14%)
£3.7b(8%)
BY CHANNEL
BY
SEG
MEN
TIMPLIED ANNUAL RESTAURANT
MARKET SPEND* £45.3b
£1.7(3.7%)
£1.5(3.2%)
£1.6(3.6%)
£1.7(3.8%)
£1.0(2.3%)
£1.4(3.2%)
£0.9(2.0%)
£1.8(3.9%)
£2.2(4.8%)
£1.2(2.6%)
£1.2(2.6%)
£1.6(3.5%)
£1.5(3.3%)
£0.6(1.3%)
£1.2(2.7%)
£0.6(1.3%)
£1.3(2.9%)
£1.5(3.3%)
£2.1(4.7%)
£1.9(4.2%)
£1.4(3.1%)
£1.8(4.0%)
£1.0(2.2%)
£0.7(1.6%)
£0.6(1.4%)
£0.7(1.5%)
£0.4(0.8%)
£1.4(3.0%)
£0.9(2.1%)
£1.1(2.4%)
£0.9(2.0%)
£0.4(0.9%)
£0.6(1.3%)
£0.3(0.6%)
£0.5(1.0%)
£0.5(1.1%)
£0.7(1.4%)
£0.6(1.3%)
£0.6(1.2%)
£0.5(1.1%)
£0.2(0.4%)
£0.4(0.9%)
£0.1(0.3%)
£0.3(0.7%)
£0.5(1.0%)
Notes: *Implied annual restaurant market spend is a calculated total restaurant expenditure for UK adults in the restaurant market across all day-parts, excluding expenditure from specific segments that are excluded in the MCA Eating Out Panel consumer research, in particular children and tourists.
CONSUMER TYPOLOGY ANALYSIS
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Customer segmentation – Top 10 restaurant brands The M segments strongly over-index for leading fast food and casual dining brands, while the G segments are over-represented among pub brands.
120
TOP 10 RESTAURANT BRANDS
ACROSS ALL DAY-PARTS(Visit share and indices for each
segment against the average)
139 146 109 128 166 89 120 67 31
82 65 85 79 106 103 142 132 110
136 156 103 133 142 77 126 78 34
115 176 129 150 133 98 112 61 21
84 108 87 120 103 87 89 114 93
46 65 49 83 118 87 98 124 168
101 143 89 106 108 69 104 103 96
46 104 44 118 90 78 99 120 147
233 181 181 131 69 73 60 32 24
146 98 91 127 82 142 42 94 73
14.8%
7.5%
4.7%
2.6%
1.6%
1.5%
1.2%
1.2%
1.0%
0.9%
Notes: Bubble size relates to the absolute value of index. E.g. The Explorers strongly over-index on McDonald’s against the sample average of 14.8%. Colour: green (index over 110), grey (index under 110); data source: MAT June 2016, MCA EOP
CONSUMER TYPOLOGY ANALYSIS
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Contents
Introduction and background
Executive summary
Market
Competitive landscape
Consumer insight
Consumer typology analysis
Section summary
Customer typology overview
Customer profile types
Bespoke consumer research
Future outlook
121
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
£7.0bn
Worked example and notes on calculations used
122
Participation 65% (129)
Visit frequency p/y 18 (154)
Average spend p/h £5.03 (96)(Implied annual
res. mkt expenditure)
Key messages
∆TO AVERAGETOP 10 OCCASIONS FOR THE EXPLORERS
Key messages
AVERAGE SPEND P/H
Channel visit share and average spend Consideration set and non-consideration level% who only considered 1
brand for last restaurant visit
51%
(76)
TOP 10 NEEDS FOR THE EXPLORERS
Strong day-part participation and visit frequency but low average spend
46% (127)
£6 (98)
Top brands with the highest segment skew
Population: 5.9 m
52% 57%
48% 43%
Average The Explorers
Fri-Sun
Mon-Thu
Early week v late week
(355)
∆TO AVERAGE
No. of restaurant brands considered for a visit:
1.9
(118)
15% of the Explorers eat out in the restaurant market for having a treat.(Single choice question)
The Explorers spent £7.0bn in the restaurant market in 2016
21% of the Explorers choose a venue based on food quality/taste;(multiple choice question)
Index against the average for restaurant market customers
1% higher compared to the avg. for restaurant market customers
46% of the Explorers’ restaurant market visits end up in fast food outlets. Index of 127 against the average for all the res. mkt customers
The Explorers on average spend £6 per visit at fast food outlets, with an index of 98 against the average for res. mkt customers
Turtle Bay has the strongest customer visit skew towards the Explorers, based on last month visits; a min sample size of 50 applies; index against the total res. mkt customers
65% of the Explorers have eaten out for breakfast in the past year, with an index of 129 against the average share for all adult customers
Index against the avg. for restaurant market customers who eat out on this mission
1pp higher compared to the total restaurant market customers
The average spend when eating out on this mission
The Explorers on average visit the res. mkt 18 times for breakfasts. With an index of 160 against the total customers
The Explorers on average spend £5.03 per head per visit for breakfast, under-indexing compared to the total customers
CONSUMER TYPOLOGY ANALYSIS
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
1%
2%
-3%
-1%
-2%
2%
3%
0%
-2%
1%
£ 11.06 (85)
£ 9.57 (79)
£ 13.55 (84)
£ 8.18 (85)
£ 15.87 (90)
£ 11.04 (84)
£ 17.84 (77)
£ 11.70 (98)
£ 7.89 (94)
£ 6.85 (94)
M – The Explorers (18-24s)
123
Participation 65% (129) 96% (105) 91% (106) 82% (131)
Visit frequency p/y 18 (154) 40 (144) 42 (159) 31 (186)
Average spend p/h £5.03 (96) £7.95 (82) £15.04 (86) £4.66 (84)
The Explorers are the younger Millennials, with key characteristics of strong day-part participation, frequent restaurant visits, wide eating out consideration set, but spending lower than the average compared to other generations. The opportunities to target the explorers include developing offers for authentic ethnic cuisines and promoting informal dining experiences.
(Implied annual res. mkt
expenditure)
£7.0bn
15%
15%
10%
6%
6%
6%
6%
5%
4%
4%
Having a treat
Get together
Too tired to cook
With my partner
To wind down
Special occasion
Specific cuisine
Other shopping
Work/study break
Regular routine
Under-index for social occasions; highest average spend when want a specific cuisine
∆TO AVERAGETOP 10 OCCASIONS FOR THE EXPLORERS
Strongly over-indexing for fast service
AVERAGE SPEND P/H
Channel visit share and average spend
21% (70)
Consideration set and non-consideration level
% who only considered 1 brand for last restaurant visit
51%
(76)
1%
-3%
1%
-1%
1%
0%
1%
-1%
2%
-1%
21%
16%
13%
11%
9%
9%
9%
7%
7%
7%
Food quality/ taste
Wide menu choice
Been there before
Good value
Close to home
Inexpensive prices
Fast service
Nice environment
Convenient - other*
Recommendation
TOP 10 NEEDS FOR THE EXPLORERS
£10 (86)
Strong day-part participation and visit frequency but low average spend
46% (127)
£6 (98)
15% (72)
£10 (78)
14% (137)
£13 (92)
5% (130)
£19 (74)
Top brands with the highest segment skew
Population: 5.9 m
52% 57%
48% 43%
Average The Explorers
Fri-Sun
Mon-Thu
Early week v late week
(355)
(302)
(302)
(297)
(296)
(295)
∆TO AVERAGE
No. of restaurant brands considered for a visit:
1.9
(118)
Convenient – other*: close to a place other than home or workplace, e.g. shops, leisure facility, etc.
CONSUMER TYPOLOGY ANALYSIS
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
The New Parents strongly over-index for participation and visit frequency. Fast food outlets are the main destinations. With the constriction with younger kids, getting together with friends is less important for the new parents, and family friendliness is a key need for choosing an appropriate venue. Critical to attract new parents is to provide family friendly services and facilities. Celebration offers (birthday party, etc.) for young kids will also encourage the New Parents to spend more per visit.
£ 10.87 (90)
£ 15.08 (94)
£ 9.87 (102)
£ 17.00 (97)
£ 13.65 (104)
£ 7.79 (93)
£ 19.27 (83)
£ 9.75 (94)
£ 11.67 (98)
£ 8.90 (123)
M – The New Parents (25-34s, with children at home)
124
Participation 76% (150) 96% (104) 93% (109) 82% (132)
Visit frequency p/y 30 (252) 46 (164) 46 (171) 57 (335)
Average spend p/h £5.31 (102) £8.84 (91) £17.44 (100) £5.42 (98)
(Implied annual res. mkt
expenditure)
£6.1bn
16%
11%
9%
7%
6%
5%
5%
5%
4%
4%
Having a treat
Get together
Too tired to cook
With my partner
To wind down
Other shopping
Special occasion
Regular routine
Specific cuisine
Work/study break
Over-index for treat occasions; highest average spend for special occasions
∆TO AVERAGETOP 10 OCCASIONS FOR THE NEW PARENTS
Over-index for the need of family friendliness
AVERAGE SPEND P/H
Channel visit share and average spend
21% (71)
Consideration set and non-consideration level
2%
-6%
0%
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1%
15%
14%
10%
9%
8%
7%
7%
6%
5%
5%
Food quality/ taste
Wide menu choice
Been there before
Close to home
Good value
Fast service
Family friendly
Inexpensive prices
Convenient - other*
Friendly Service
TOP 10 NEEDS FOR THE NEW PARENTS
£11 (90)
Strong day-part participation and visit frequency
44% (124)
£7 (109)
18% (85)
£10 (78)
12% (124)
£12 (84)
5% (130)
£20 (79)
Top brands with the highest segment skew
Population: 3.6 m
52% 56%
48% 44%
Average The New Parents
Fri-Sun
Mon-Thu
Early week v late week
(402)
(377)
(361)
(343)
(331)
(331)
∆TO AVERAGE
-5%
0%
-6%
-3%
-3%
1%
3%
-1%
-3%
-1%
% who only considered 1 brand for last restaurant visit
50%
(74)
No. of restaurant brands customers are aware of:
2.1
(130)
Convenient – other*: close to a place other than home or workplace, e.g. shops, leisure facility, etc.
CONSUMER TYPOLOGY ANALYSIS
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
The Home Builders are the older millennials but have no children at home. This segment strongly over-indexes for visit frequency and contemporary chain restaurants (especially for contemporary brands). Having a treat is the joint No.1 mission and food quality is the most important need. This indicates strengthening food quality perception is the key to attract this segment to visit and build their loyalty.
M – The Home Builders (25-34s, with no children at home)
125
Participation 69% (136) 95% (104) 94% (110) 76% (122)
Visit frequency p/y 17 (144) 38 (135) 40 (150) 23 (134)
Average spend p/h £5.16 (99) £8.65 (89) £17.42 (100) £5.23 (96)
(Implied annual res. mkt
expenditure)
£6.2bn
14%
14%
10%
9%
6%
5%
5%
4%
4%
4%
Get together
Having a treat
Too tired to cook
With my partner
To wind down
Specific cuisine
Special occasion
Other shopping
At leisure activity
Work/study break
Under-index for getting together; highest average for special occasions
∆TO AVERAGETOP 10 OCCASIONS FOR THE HOME BUILDERS
Food quality, inexpensive, fast and recommendation over-indexing
AVERAGE SPEND P/H
Channel visit share and average spend Consideration set and non-consideration level
22%
14%
14%
11%
11%
9%
9%
9%
7%
7%
Food quality/ taste
Wide menu choice
Been there before
Good value
Close to home
Inexpensive prices
Convenient - other*
Fast service
Nice environment
Recommendation
∆TO AVERAGETOP 10 NEEDS FOR THE HOME BUILDERS
Strong day-part participation and visit frequency
Top brands with the highest segment skew
Population: 5.1 m
52% 51%
48% 49%
Average The Home Builders
Fri-Sun
Mon-Thu
Early week v late week
(374)
(362)
(359)
(356)
(303)
(280)
-3%
0%
1%
1%
1%
1%
-1%
-1%
0%
1%
2%
0%
-2%
0%
-1%
2%
0%
2%
0%
1%
£ 16.65 (104)
£ 11.70 (96)
£ 9.17 (95)
£ 18.40 (105)
£ 12.60 (96)
£ 11.11 (93)
£ 23.41 (101)
£ 9.69 (116)
£ 7.58 (104)
£ 11.45 (94)
% who only considered 1 brand for last restaurant visit
62%
(92)
No. of restaurant brands customers are aware of:
1.7
(106)24% (81)
£11 (95)
38% (107)
£6 (99)
21% (101)
£13 (100)
12% (124)
£15 (103)
4% (111)
£24 (97)
Convenient – other*: close to a place other than home or workplace, e.g. shops, leisure facility, etc.
CONSUMER TYPOLOGY ANALYSIS
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
The Established Families are more affluent and mature customers. This segment strongly over-indexes for participation, frequency and average spend across all day-parts, especially in the later week (Fri-Sun). Customers in this segment have broad eating out repertoires but are relatively loyal, with 62% only considering one brand for each of their most recent visits. Targeting the Established Families with children’s menu, celebration offers and family friendly services/facilities are key business development opportunities.
X – The Established Families (35-54s, ABC1, children at home)
126
Participation 67% (132) 96% (104) 92% (107) 71% (115)
Visit frequency p/y 19 (158) 38 (137) 36 (134) 29 (171)
Average spend p/h £5.26 (101) £9.67 (99) £18.89(108) £5.75 (104)
(Implied annual res. mkt
expenditure)
£6.4bn
16%
14%
9%
7%
6%
6%
5%
4%
4%
4%
Having a treat
Get together
Too tired to cook
With my partner
Special occasion
To wind down
Other shopping
Specific cuisine
Regular routine
Work/study break
Highest average spend when want a specific cuisine and with my partner
∆TO AVERAGETOP 10 OCCASIONS FOR ESTABLISHED FAMILIES
Family friendliness is a key need
AVERAGE SPEND P/H
Channel visit share and average spend
23% (77)
Consideration set and non-consideration level
20%
14%
14%
12%
10%
9%
8%
7%
7%
7%
Food quality/ taste
Wide menu choice
Been there before
Close to home
Good value
Family friendly
Convenient - other*
Nice environment
Inexpensive prices
Fast service
∆TO AVERAGETOP 10 NEEDS FOR ESTABLISHED FAMILIES
£12 (106)
Over-index for participation, visit frequency and average spend for all day-parts
45% (125)
£7 (110)
18% (88)
£14 (107)
11% (106)
£14 (100)
3% (97)
£25 (101)
Top brands with the highest segment skew
Population: 4.9 m
52% 49%
48% 51%
Average The Established Families
Fri-Sun
Mon-Thu
Early week v late week
(347)
(254)
(225)
(209)
1%
-4%
0%
-1%
0%
1%
0%
0%
-1%
1%
0%
0%
-2%
1%
-1%
5%
0%
0%
0%
1%
£ 12.83 (106)
£ 17.11 (107)
£ 10.50 (109)
£ 19.67 (112)
£ 24.50 (105)
£ 15.00 (114)
£ 10.13 (121)
£ 12.40 (104)
£ 10.73 (103)
£ 6.92 (95)
% who only considered 1 brand for last restaurant visit
62%
(92)
No. of restaurant brands customers are aware of:
1.7
(108)
Convenient – other*: close to a place other than home or workplace, e.g. shops, leisure facility, etc.
(204)
(202)
CONSUMER TYPOLOGY ANALYSIS
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
The Humble Householders are less affluent parents, who under-index for average spend for the main day-parts. With children being the No.1 priority in the household, family friendliness is of substantial importance for choosing a specific venue to visit, though over half of visits end up in fast food outlets. Customers in this segment are most willing to spend more for special occasions, especially when celebrating with their partners.
X – The Humble Householders (35-54s, C2DE, children at home)
127
Participation 56% (111) 92% (100) 86% (101) 67% (108)
Visit frequency p/y 14 (121) 27 (95) 26 (97) 15 (91)
Average spend p/h £5.07 (97) £8.29 (85) £15.03 (86) £6.03 (109)
(Implied annual res. mkt
expenditure)
£3.2bn
19%
13%
10%
7%
7%
5%
5%
5%
4%
4%
Having a treat
Get together
Too tired to cook
Other shopping
With my partner
To wind down
Special occasion
Regular routine
Specific cuisine
Shopping for groceries
Strongly over-index for having a treat; highest average spend for specific cuisines
∆TO AVERAGETOP 10 OCCASIONS FOR HUMBLE HOUSEHOLDERS
Strongly over-index for the need of family friendliness
AVERAGE SPEND P/H
Channel visit share and average spend
26% (88)
Consideration set and non-consideration level
18%
14%
13%
12%
11%
8%
8%
7%
7%
5%
Food quality/ taste
Been there before
Wide menu choice
Good value
Close to home
Family friendly
Convenient - other*
Inexpensive prices
Fast service
Nice environment
∆TO AVERAGETOP 10 NEEDS FOR HUMBLE HOUSEHOLDERS
£11 (97)
In line for visit frequency but under-index for average spend at lunch and dinner
48% (135)
£6 (99)
14% (70)
£12 (95)
9% (88)
£14 (99)
2% (60)
£23 (91)
Top brands with the highest segment skew
Population: 4.2 m
52% 49%
48% 51%
Average Humble Householders
Fri-Sun
Mon-Thu
Early week v late week
(207)
(172)
(170)
(162)
(160)
(154)
5%
-4%
1%
1%
-1%
0%
-1%
0%
0%
1%
-2%
-2%
-1%
0%
-1%
4%
-1%
0%
1%
-2%
£ 10.13 (83)
£ 14.38 (90)
£ 8.89 (92)
£ 6.73 (80)
£ 15.03 (85)
£ 11.67 (89)
£ 21.85 (94)
£ 8.37 (81)
£ 11.36 (95)
£ 6.06 (84)
% who only considered 1 brand for last restaurant visit
63%
(93)
No. of restaurant brands customers are aware of:
1.7
(106)
Convenient – other*: close to a place other than home or workplace, e.g. shops, leisure facility, etc.
CONSUMER TYPOLOGY ANALYSIS
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
X – Aspiring Child Free (35-54s, ABC1, no children at home)
128
Participation 57% (114) 93% (101) 90% (105) 62% (99)
Visit frequency p/y 12 (99) 29 (105) 29 (107) 13 (77)
Average spend p/h £5.05 (97) £10.11 (104) £18.75 (108) £5.75 (104)
(Implied annual res. mkt
expenditure)
£4.4bn
17%
14%
10%
8%
6%
6%
5%
5%
4%
4%
Get together
Having a treat
Too tired to cook
With my partner
To wind down
Special occasion
Regular routine
Specific cuisine
Other shopping
Leisure-based journey
Over-index for social occasions; highest average spend for special occasions
∆TO AVERAGETOP 10 OCCASIONS FOR ASPIRING CHILD FREE
Need strong food quality credentials
AVERAGE SPEND P/H
Channel visit share and average spend
31% (103)
Consideration set and non-consideration level
24%
19%
15%
13%
12%
11%
8%
8%
7%
7%
Food quality/ taste
Been there before
Close to home
Wide menu choice
Good value
Convenient - other*
Inexpensive prices
Nice environment
Recommendation
Fast service
∆TO AVERAGETOP 10 NEEDS FOR ASPIRING CHILD FREE
£12 (106)
Higher day-part participation and visit frequency but lower average spend p/h p/v
32% (89)
£6 (95)
24% (115)
£14 (107)
10% (102)
£16 (113)
3% (97)
£31 (125)
Top brands with the highest segment skew
Population: 4.6 m
52% 46%
48% 54%
Average Aspiring Empty Nester
Fri-Sun
Mon-Thu
Early week v late week
(212)
(205)
(187)
(184)
(180)
(172)
-1%
-1%
1%
1%
1%
0%
0%
0%
-2%
0%
4%
3%
3%
-1%
1%
3%
1%
1%
2%
1%
£ 18.05 (112)
£ 13.75 (113)
£ 10.06 (104)
£ 20.72 (118)
£ 13.20 (101)
£ 26.09 (112)
£ 10.91 (105)
£ 11.95 (100)
£ 9.37 (112)
£ 13.12 (114)
% who only considered 1 brand for last restaurant visit
72%
(106)
No. of restaurant brands customers are aware of:
1.6
(98)
Aspiring Child Free are the more affluent 35-54s and have no children at home. Customers in this segment are above average spends and like to visit restaurants where they have been there before and which have strong food quality credentials. The majority of their visits happen in the later week (Friday to Sunday) and have a strong skew towards independent restaurants and premium casual dining brands.
Convenient – other*: close to a place other than home or workplace, e.g. shops, leisure facility, etc.
CONSUMER TYPOLOGY ANALYSIS
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Functional Child Free under-index for participation, frequency and spend for lunch and dinner. Fast food and pubs are the main destinations. More functional missions over-index for Functional Child Free, including too tired to cook and out for shopping. However all these functional missions are associated with low relative spends. Promoting budget special occasion meal deal offers for functional Child Free is a key opportunity.
X – Functional Child Free (35-54s, C2DE, no children at home)
129
Participation 49% (98) 89% (96) 80% (93) 60% (97)
Visit frequency p/y 11 (93) 22 (80) 23 (88) 12 (68)
Average spend p/h £5.02 (96) £8.49 (87) £14.66 (84) £5.86 (106)
(Implied annual res. mkt
expenditure)
£2.5bn
16%
15%
12%
8%
6%
5%
5%
5%
4%
4%
Having a treat
Get together
Too tired to cook
With my partner
Other shopping
To wind down
Regular routine
Specific cuisine
Special occasion
Shopping for groceries
Getting together and special occasions under indexing
∆TO AVERAGETOP 10 OCCASIONS FOR FUNCTIONAL CHILD FREE
Good value is a key need
AVERAGE SPEND P/H
Channel visit share and average spend
30% (101)
Consideration set and non-consideration level
20%
17%
13%
13%
12%
9%
8%
7%
6%
5%
Food quality/ taste
Been there before
Wide menu choice
Good value
Close to home
Convenient - other*
Inexpensive prices
Fast service
Friendly Service
Nice environment
∆TO AVERAGETOP 10 NEEDS FOR FUNCTIONAL CHILD FREE
£11 (95)
Under index for participation, frequency and spend for lunch and dinner
42% (117)
£6 (92)
18% (87)
£13 (96)
7% (73)
£15 (104)
3% (73)
£20 (80)
Top brands with the highest segment skew
Population: 3.9 m
52% 51%
48% 49%
Average Functional Empty Nester
Fri-Sun
Mon-Thu
Early week v late week
(149)
(128)
(125)
(118)
(111)
(109)
2%
-3%
3%
1%
1%
0%
0%
0%
-2%
1%
0%
1%
-1%
1%
0%
0%
1%
1%
0%
-2%
£ 10.46 (86)
£ 14.24 (89)
£ 8.81 (91)
£ 16.74 (95)
£ 6.77 (81)
£ 11.05 (84)
£ 7.88 (76)
£ 9.86 (83)
£ 21.63 (93)
£ 5.93 (82)
% who only considered 1 brand for last restaurant visit
71%
(105)
No. of restaurant brands customers are aware of:
1.5
(93)
Convenient – other*: close to a place other than home or workplace, e.g. shops, leisure facility, etc.
CONSUMER TYPOLOGY ANALYSIS
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Greying Generation strongly over-indexes for social missions, including get-togethers, leisure activities and leisure journey. Customers in this segment over-index for the need of food quality/taste, but under-index for having a treat. This indicates a key opportunity especially for pubs, to promote treating occasions and strengthen food quality/taste.
G – Greying Generation (55-65s)
130
Participation 42% (83) 90% (98) 82% (96) 56% (90)
Visit frequency p/y 7 (57) 20 (72) 18 (66) 9 (53)
Average spend p/h £5.44 (104) £10.45 (107) £18.02 (103) £5.39 (97)
(Implied annual res. mkt
expenditure)
£4.5bn
20%
13%
9%
8%
6%
6%
5%
5%
4%
4%
Get together
Having a treat
Too tired to cook
With my partner
Other shopping
Special occasion
Leisure-based journey
Regular routine
To wind down
At leisure activity
Over-index for social occasions; highest average spend for special occasions
∆TO AVERAGETOP 10 OCCASIONS FOR GREYING GENERATION
Want food quality and trust
AVERAGE SPEND P/H
Channel visit share and average spend
38% (125)
Consideration set and non-consideration level
21%
19%
13%
12%
12%
10%
8%
7%
6%
4%
Food quality/ taste
Been there before
Wide menu choice
Good value
Close to home
Convenient - other*
Nice environment
Inexpensive prices
Friendly Service
Recommendation
∆TO AVERAGETOP 10 NEEDS FOR THE GREYING GENERATION
£12 (103)
Under index for visit participation and visit frequency across all day-parts
29% (81)
£6 (95)
24% (114)
£14 (108)
7% (75)
£16 (111)
3% (75)
£30 (117)
Top brands with the highest segment skew
Population: 7.4 m
52% 51%
48% 49%
Average Greying Generation
Fri-Sun
Mon-Thu
Early week v late week
(193)
(135)
(122)
(121)
(120)
(116)
2%
-1%
0%
1%
1%
0%
1%
0%
-1%
1%
1%
3%
-1%
1%
1%
2%
1%
0%
0%
0%
£ 16.45 (102)
£ 13.44 (111)
£ 10.31 (107)
£ 17.77 (101)
£ 8.43 (100)
£ 25.85 (111)
£ 12.60 (110)
£ 11.20 (108)
£ 14.33 (109)
£ 12.49 (103)
% who only considered 1 brand for last restaurant visit
72%
(108)
No. of restaurant brands customers are aware of:
1.5
(9.3)
Convenient – other*: close to a place other than home or workplace, e.g. shops, leisure facility, etc.
CONSUMER TYPOLOGY ANALYSIS
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Golden Oldies under-index for participation and frequency across day-parts, but they are the most loyal customers. Pubs are the main destinations. Getting together with friends and families is the main mission to eat out, and they are risk adverse and choose a venue where they have been there before for reassurance. There is an opportunity for pubs to capture more spend, not least though developing multi-generational family offer and gathering special events.
G – Golden Oldies (65+)
131
Participation 27% (53) 89% (97) 79% (92) 50% (81)
Visit frequency p/y 3 (24) 15 (53) 12 (46) 5 (29)
Average spend p/h £5.64 (108) £11.33 (116) £18.20 (104) £6.34 (114)
(Implied annual res. mkt
expenditure)
£5.0bn
28%
10%
7%
7%
7%
6%
6%
5%
4%
4%
Get together
Having a treat
With my partner
Regular routine
Other shopping
Too tired to cook
Special occasion
Leisure-based journey
At leisure activity
Other (please specify)
Over-index for getting together; highest average spend for special occasions
∆TO AVERAGETOP 10 OCCASIONS FOR GOLDREN OLDIES
Choosing a venue within on existing repertoires
AVERAGE SPEND P/H
Channel visit share and average spend
45% (148)
Consideration set and non-consideration level
19%
18%
14%
12%
12%
9%
8%
6%
5%
5%
Been there before
Food quality/ taste
Wide menu choice
Close to home
Good value
Convenient - other*
Nice environment
Friendly Service
Recommendation
Inexpensive prices
∆TO AVERAGETOP 10 NEEDS FOR GOLDEN OLDIES
£12 (105)
Under index for visit participation and visit frequency across all day-parts
16% (44)
£6 (97)
27% (133)
£14 (106)
8% (84)
£14 (103)
4% (108)
£31 (124)
Top brands with the highest segment skew
Population: 11.4 m
52% 56%
48% 44%
Average Golden Oldies
Fri-Sun
Mon-Thu
Early week v late week
(153)
(135)
(134)
(131)
(129)
(129)
10%
-4%
0%
2%
1%
-3%
1%
1%
1%
2%
3%
-2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1%
1%
0%
1%
£ 16.22 (101)
£ 14.46 (119)
£ 16.28 (93)
£ 11.98 (115)
£ 8.46 (101)
£ 10.59 (109)
£ 23.20 (100)
£ 12.24 (107)
£ 13.39 (110)
£ 12.89 (107)
% who only considered 1 brand for last restaurant visit
78%
(115)
No. of restaurant brands customers are aware of:
1.4
(86)
Convenient – other*: close to a place other than home or workplace, e.g. shops, leisure facility, etc.
CONSUMER TYPOLOGY ANALYSIS
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Contents
Introduction and background
Executive summary
Market
Competitive landscape
Consumer insight
Consumer typology analysis
Bespoke consumer research
Section summary
Spending drivers
Cuisine preference
Promotional influences
Social media and email contact
Loyalty considerations
Future outlook
132
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Section summaryCuisine collection and peer influence make Millennials the King of growth.
• 35% of 18-34s spending more on eating out than one year ago, 8pp higher than the average, reflecting the growing foodie culture among younger customers.
• Partner and friends becoming more interested in eating out is the joint most important reason for spending more on eating out these days, with Millennials and 35-54s strongly over-indexing.
• Keenness to try more cuisine types is the second most important reason for Millennials to spend more, reflecting more adventurous mindsets.
• The growing cuisine collection habit is also evident that 60% of 18-34s agree that they are trying out a broader range of cuisines than before, 15pp higher than the average.
Generation Y cutting down on alcoholic drinks to spend more on food .
• 26% of Generation Y (35-54s) are spending less on going out for a drink and increasing their spending on eating out in restaurants, compared to the average of 18% of all adults.
• Enhancing the food offers in pubs is key to retaining footfall and mitigating the expenditure lose.
Promotions remain a popular way to drive traffic.
• More restaurant offers and promotional discounts is the third most important reason for spending more now than 12 months ago. This message comes together with ‘more restaurants opened near where I live’ and ‘eating out is more affordable these days’.
• ‘Discounts and promotions’ is the third most important aspect of a branded restaurant that encourage customers to regularly visit it, with younger customers (under 55) strongly over-indexing.
133
The most favoured cuisines are becoming more multi-national.• Thai, Mexican, Mediterranean, Vegetarian, BBQ and Vietnamese
feature in the Top 10 fastest growing cuisines, with Millennials strongly over-indexing for the growth contributions
• British remains the most favourite cuisine, however it is losing its appeal to Millennials and its popularity is down slightly compared to 2-3 years ago.
• Italian cuisine is the second most favoured and is growing. The popularity has risen 3pp to 16%, driven by younger customers (under 55) and supported by promotional activity.
Emails, social media and discounts are key to target Millennials.• 46% of Millennials are on the email contact list of restaurants and pub
companies. The majority agree that being on an email contact list does encourage them to visit more often.
• 43% of Millennials confirm that they follow restaurants on Facebook and Twitter for information and deals.
• 33% of Millennials use discount vouchers most of the time when they eat out. Half of customers in this age group agree that they regularly choose a restaurant based on whether there is a voucher/promotional deal available.
Millennials want faster and more interactive service in chain restaurants.• Millennials vote friendlier and more engaging customer service (15%)
and faster service (14%) as the most important aspects that would encourage them to visit more often, 6pp respectively higher than the survey averages.
• Millennials also strongly over-index for more customisable products, more social media engagement and improved atmosphere.
• In light of heightened cost consciousness among 55+ customers, getting the value for money equation right and skilfully communicating this are important to succeeding among this segment.
BESPOKE CONSUMER SURVEY
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Contents
Introduction and background
Executive summary
Market
Competitive landscape
Consumer insight
Consumer typology analysis
Bespoke consumer research
Section summary
Spending drivers
Cuisine preference
Promotional influences
Social media and email contact
Loyalty considerations
Future outlook
134
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Who are spending more these days compared to 12 months ago?Growth is driven by Millennials. Overall, 27% of customers spend more money on eating out compared to 12 months ago, 3pp higher than the proportion of people who spend less. 18-34s strongly over-index for spending more these days, reflecting fewer dependents in the household and generally reduced financial pressure.
Compared with 12 months ago, are you now spending more money on eating out?
Single choice, % of respondents
135
27%35%
21%28%
49% 36%53%
55%
24% 29% 27%17%
Average 18-34s 35-55s 55+
Spending less these days
Spending about the same
Spending more these days
Data source: MCA bespoke survey, 2016
N.B. Net increase/decrease is the absolute value of the difference between ‘spending more these days’ and ‘ spending less these days’.
BESPOKE CONSUMER SURVEY
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Top ten reasons for spending more money on eating out Increases in food and drink prices and partner / friends eating out more often are the main reasons for spending more money on eating out. 30% vote the increase of prices is the main reason, strongly driven by 55+. The changing behaviour of partner / friends is the joint No.1 reason, with the under 55s strongly over-represented.
If spending more, what would you most attribute this to?
Multiple choice, % of respondents who spend more these days
136
Average, 30% Average, 30%Average, 28% Average, 25% Average, 24%
19
% 33
%
27
%
28
%
23
%30
%
32
%
22
%
19
%
20
%
43
%
24
% 34
%
27
%
26
%
Food & drink prices haveincreased in restaurants &
pubs
My partner/friends are moreinterested in eating out
More retaurant offers andpromotional discounts
More restaurants have openednear to where I live
Feel more comfortable aboutthe outlook for my finances
18-34 35-55 55+Average
Average, 23% Average, 23% Average, 23%Average, 20%
Average, 18%
22
%
25
% 31
%
16
%
16
%
20
% 24
%
22
%
20
% 26
%
26
%
18
%
14
% 24
%
14
%
I am buying from betterquality establishments than I
used to
My financial circumstanceshave improved
Keener to try more cuisinetypes
It is more affordable thesedays
Spending less on going out fora drink
1 1 3 4 5
6 6 6 9 10
Data source: MCA bespoke survey, 2016
BESPOKE CONSUMER SURVEY
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Top ten reasons for Millennials spending more money on eating out Peer influence is the most important reason for Millennials spending more. 33% of Millennials who spend more on eating out compared to one year ago vote ‘my partner/friends are more interested in eating out’ as one of the most important reason, 3pp higher than the average. This indicates Millennials are more likely to be influenced by the changing attitudes and behaviours of others. Keener to try more cuisine types is the second most important reason, reflecting millennials’ adventurous characters and lower risk aversion.
If spending more, what would you most attribute this to?
Multiple choice, % of 18-34s who spend more these days
137
30%
23%25%
28%23%
33% 31%28% 27% 25%
My partner / friends are moreinterested in eating out
Keener to try more cuisinetypes
More restaurants have openednear to where I live
More retaurant offers andpromotional discounts
My financial circumstanceshave improved
18-34Average
Data source: MCA bespoke survey, 2016
1 2 3 4 5
24% 23%30%
20% 18%23% 22%
19% 16% 16%
Feel more comfortable aboutthe outlook for my finances
I am buying from betterquality establishments than I
used to
Food & drink prices haveincreased in restaurants &
pubs
It is more affordable thesedays
Spending less on going out fora drink
6 7 8 9 10
BESPOKE CONSUMER SURVEY
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Top ten reasons for 35-54s spending more money on eating out The changing behaviour of partner/friends is the most important reason for 35-54s to spend more. 32% of 35-54s who spend more these days vote ‘my partner/friends are more interested in eating out’ as the one of the most important reasons, 2pp higher than the average. Spending less on going out for a drink is the third most important reason for 35-54s, 8pp higher than the average. This reflects the middle-aged customers switching their spending from alcoholic beverages to food.
If spending more, what would you most attribute this to?
Multiple choice, % of 35-54s who spend more these days
138
30% 30%
18%23%
17%
32% 30%26% 24% 24%
My partner/friends are moreinterested in eating out
Food & drink prices haveincreased in restaurants &
pubs
Spending less on going out fora drink
My financial circumstanceshave improved
I am buying more expensivedishes on menus these days
35-55Average
Data source: MCA bespoke survey, 2016
1 2 3 4 4
23%28%
24% 23%20%22% 22% 20% 20% 20%
Keener to try more cuisinetypes
More retaurant offers andpromotional discounts
Feel more comfortable aboutthe outlook for my finances
I am buying from betterquality establishments than I
used to
It is more affordable thesedays
6 6 8 8 8
BESPOKE CONSUMER SURVEY
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Top ten reasons for 55+ spending more money on eating out Rising food and drink prices are the main reason why 55+ say they are spending more. 43% think ‘food and drink prices have increased in restaurants and pubs’ is the key reason for them spending more money on eating out, 13pp higher than the average. In addition, promotional discounts are an important factor that encourages 55+ customers to visit and spend more.
If spending more, what would you most attribute this to?
Multiple choice, % of 55+ who spend more these days
139
30% 28% 25% 24% 23%
43%34%
27% 26% 26%
Food & drink prices haveincreased in restaurants &
pubs
More retaurant offers andpromotional discounts
More restaurants have openednear to where I live
Feel more comfortable aboutthe outlook for my finances
I am buying from betterquality establishments than I
used to
55+Average
Data source: MCA bespoke survey, 2016
1 2 3 4 4
30%
20% 23%17%
12%
24% 24%18% 17% 15%
My partner/friends are moreinterested in eating out
It is more affordable thesedays
My financial circumstanceshave improved
I am buying more expensivedishes on menus these days
Belong to more loyaltyschemes
6 6 8 9 10
BESPOKE CONSUMER SURVEY
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
12% 13% 10% 13%21% 21%
53% 50% 52%56%
57% 56%
28% 29% 30%25%
17% 17%
5% 5% 6% 5% 4% 4%2% 3% 2% 2% 1% 2%
Average 18-34s 35-55s 55+ Eat out more often these daysSpend more these days
DisagreeeStrongly
Disagree
Neither
Agree
Agree Strongly
Better choice of good quality restaurants and pubsThe majority of customers agree there is a much better choice of good quality restaurants and pubs these days. 55+ customers and those who eat out more often and spend more all strongly over-index.
To what extent do you agree with following statement?
% of respondents
140
There is a much better choice of good quality restaurants and pubs these days
Data source: MCA bespoke survey, 2016
BESPOKE CONSUMER SURVEY
Eat out more often these days
Spend more these days
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
8% 11% 7% 8% 9% 9%
39%44%
39% 35%45% 42%
34%31%
36%33%
29% 29%
14%13%
13%16%
15% 16%
5% 2% 6% 8% 3% 4%
Average 18-34s 35-55s 55+
DisagreeeStrongly
Disagree
Neither
Agree
Agree Strongly
The rise of the lower-ticket restaurantsMillennials visit more lower-ticket restaurants. 47% of customers agree that they visit more restaurants that offer lower prices or value deals, with 18-34s and customers who eat out more often and spend more strongly over-indexing.
To what extent do you agree with following statement?
% of respondents
141
Data source: MCA bespoke survey, 2016
I visit more restaurants that offer lower prices or value deals
BESPOKE CONSUMER SURVEY
Eat out more often these days
Spend more these days
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Contents
Introduction and background
Executive summary
Market
Competitive landscape
Consumer insight
Consumer typology analysis
Bespoke consumer research
Section summary
Spending drivers
Cuisine preference
Promotional influences
Social media and email contact
Loyalty considerations
Future outlook
142
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
The globalising popularity of the Top 20 favourite cuisine types British cuisine is the most favoured. 18% of respondents vote British as their favourite cuisine, down 0.3 pp compared to 2-3 years ago. Italian is the second most favoured, up 3pp in the same amount of time. Ten out of the Top 20 favourite cuisine types have grown popularity, led by Italian, Thai, Mexican and Mediterranean, but also with signs of interesting enjoyment of Japanese, Indian and Spanish cuisines. Healthier influences are also coming through with rising popularity of vegetarian and seafood dishes.
Top 20 favourite cuisine types 2016 v 2-3 years ago, % of respondents
143
Data source: MCA bespoke survey, 2016
18.2%
16.3%
9.5%8.2%
4.9% 4.5% 4.0% 3.9%3.1% 2.8% 2.6% 2.4% 2.4% 2.4% 2.1% 1.9% 1.5% 1.5% 1.3% 0.8%
PP compared to 2-3 years ago
-0.32.6
-2.9-4.6
-0.9-1.0 1.8
-1.3 1.31.5 1.0 -2.5 1.3 1.5 -0.3 1.0 0.20.6-0.5 0.1
BESPOKE CONSUMER SURVEY
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Top 10 most popular cuisines, 2016 British is the most favoured cuisine, particularly for 55+ customers. 18% vote British as the their favourite type of cuisine, strongly supported by 55+ customers. Italian is the second favourite cuisine, with broad appeal to all age groups. Indian and Chinese rank in the third and fourth places, with 35-54 strongly over-indexing. Millennials are over-represented for Italian, chicken, Thai, burger and Mexican food.
When you are eating out these days, what is your favourite type of cuisine? Single choice, % of respondents
144
Average, 18.2%Average, 16.3%
Average, 9.5%
Average, 8.2%Average, 4.9%
10
.3%
18
.7%
6.5
%
6.8
%
7.1
%
17
.6%
15
.6%
12
.3%
10
.6%
2.5
%
25
.8%
14
.9%
9.3
%
7.0
%
5.3
%
British Italian Indian Chinese Chicken
18-34 35-55 55+Average
Average, 4.5% Average, 4.0% Average, 3.9% Average, 3.1% Average, 2.8%
3.2
%
4.2
% 6.1
%
2.9
%
4.2
%
5.0
%
3.6
%
4.7
%
2.2
%
2.8
%5.1
%
4.2
%
1.1
%
4.2
%
1.7
%
Pub Food Thai Burger Vegetarian Mexican
12
3
45
6 6 6 9 9
Data source: MCA bespoke survey, 2016
BESPOKE CONSUMER SURVEY
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
↑ 2.6%
↑ 1.8%
↑ 1.5%
↑ 1.5%
↑ 1.3%
↑2.9%
↑1.9%
↑3.2%
↑1.9%
↑1.3%
↑ 3.4%
↑ 2.0% ↑
0.3%↑
0.8%
-0.6%
↑ 1.7%
↑ 1.4%
↑ 1.1%
↑ 1.7%
↑ 3.1%
Italian Thai Mexican Mediterranean Vegetarian
The fast growing cuisines by age groupMillennials are the key drivers for the majority of the fast growing minority cuisines. Millennials over-index for the growth of Thai, Mediterranean, Mexican, BBQ and Vietnamese cuisines. 35-55s over-index for Italian, Thai, regional Indian cuisines. 55+ are over-represented for the growth for Mediterranean, seafood and vegetarian cuisines.
Fast growing cuisines, by age groups, 2016 v 2-3 years ago
Single choice, % represents the increased respondents who choose this type of cuisine as their favourite, % of respondents
145
18-34 35-55 55+Average
↑ 1.3%
↑ 1.0%
↑ 1.0%
↑ 0.6%
↑ 0.5%0.0%
↑0.3%
↑2.6%
↑0.3%
↑1.0%
↑ 0.8%
↑ 2.2%
0.0%↑
0.6%↑
0.3%
↑ 2.8%
↑ 0.3%
↑ 0.6%
↑ 0.6%
↑ 0.3%
Seafood/Shellfish Regional Indian BBQ Japanese Vietnamese
1 2 3 3 5
5 7 7 9 10
Data source: MCA bespoke survey, 2016
BESPOKE CONSUMER SURVEY
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
The declining cuisines by age groupChinese and India cuisines losing their appeal to the older customers. A large promotion of customers have switched their favourite cuisine from Chinese and India to others, with 55+ strongly over-indexing for both. Millennials account for the biggest decreases for American, burger and pub food.
146
Fast growing cuisines, by age groups, 2016 v 2-3 years ago
Single choice, % represents the decreased respondents who choose this type of cuisine as their favourite, % of respondents
18-34 35-55 55+Average
↓ -4.6%
↓ -2.9%
↓ -2.5%
↓ -1.3%
↓ -1.0%
↓ -4.5%
0.3%
↓ -4.2%
↓ -2.9%
↓ -2.3%
↓ -3.6%
↓ -3.9%
↓ -2.5%
↓ -0.3%
0.6%
↓ -5.6%
↓ -4.8%
↓ -1.1%
↓ -0.8%
↓ -1.4%
Chinese Indian American (Excl. burgers) Burger Pub Food1 2 3 4 5
Data source: MCA bespoke survey, 2016
BESPOKE CONSUMER SURVEY
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Top ten favourite cuisines for 18-34s, now v 2-3 years agoItalian, BBQ and Thai are growing popularity among Millennials (18-34s). Italian is the most favoured and fastest growing cuisine for Millennials and the popularity has grown 2.9pp in the past 2-3 years. The popularity of BBQ has grown 2.6pp to 6.1%, 3pp higher than the average. This indicates Millennials are the main driver for the rise of BBQ. 4.2% of Millennials also vote Mexican as a favourite cuisine type, again higher than the average.
Top 20 favourite cuisine types 2016 v 2-3 years ago
Single choice, % of respondents
147
16.3%18.2%
4.9%
8.2%9.5%
18.7%
10.3%
7.1% 6.8% 6.5%
Italian British Chicken Chinese Indian
18-34Average
Data source: MCA bespoke survey, 2016
1 2 3 4 5
3.9%2.6% 2.4% 2.8%
4.0%
6.1% 6.1%
4.5% 4.2% 4.2%
Burger BBQ American (Excl. burgers) Mexican Thai
6 6 8 9 9
2.9↑
2.9↓
1.3↓ 4.5↓
4.2↓ 1.9↑
2.6↑
0.9↓
4.6↓
1.3↓
1.0↑ 2.5↓ 1.5↑
↑↔↓: PP compared to 2-3 years ago
0.3↓
2.9↓
1.8↑
0.3↑
2.9↓ 2.6↑
3.2↑
BESPOKE CONSUMER SURVEY
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Top ten favourite cuisines for 35-54s, now v 2-3 years agoBritish, Italian, pub food, Thai and regional Indian are growing in popularity among 35-54s. British is the most favoured cuisine for 35-54s, up 1pp from 2-3 years ago. Italian cuisine is the second favoured, up 3pp for customers aged 35-54. Pub food, Thai and regional Indian have also grown in popularity among this age group.
Top 20 favourite cuisine types 2016 v 2-3 years ago
Single choice, % of respondents
148
18.2%16.3%
9.5%8.2%
4.5%
17.6%15.6%
12.3%10.6%
5.0%
British Italian Indian Chinese Pub Food
35-54Average
Data source: MCA bespoke survey, 2016
1 2 3 4 5
3.9% 4.0%
2.8%
1.5%
4.9%4.7%3.6%
2.8% 2.8% 2.5%
Burger Thai Mexican Regional Indian Chicken
6 7 8 9 10
0.8↑
3.9↓3.6↓
3PP↑2.0↑
2.9↓4.6↓
1.0↓
1.5↑
1.8↑1.3↓
1.0↑
0.9↓
3.4↑
0.6↑
2.2↑ 1.1↓
0.3↓2.6↑
0.3↓
0.3↑
↑↔↓: PP compared to 2-3 years ago
BESPOKE CONSUMER SURVEY
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
4.5%
2.4%
4.0%3.1%
2.4%
5.1% 5.1%4.2% 4.2%
3.4%
Pub Food Seafood/Shellfish Thai Vegetarian Mediterranean
18.2%16.3%
9.5% 8.2%4.9%
25.8%
14.9%
9.3%7.0%
5.3%
British Italian Indian Chinese Chicken
Top ten favourite cuisines for 55+, now v 2-3 years agoAll cuisines except Indian, Chinese, chicken and pub food, are growing in popularity among the 55+. More than one in four 55+ customers vote British cuisine as their favourite, up 1pp from 2-3 years ago. This highlights heightened cost conscious among this more mature customer segment.
Top 20 favourite cuisine types 2016 v 2-3 years ago
Single choice, % of respondents
149
55+Average
Data source: MCA bespoke survey, 2016
1 2 3 4 5
6 6 8 8 10
1.1↑
4.8↓5.6↓
3.1↑2.8↑
↔
1.8↑
1.3↑
1.0↓
1.3↑
1PP↓
1.7↑
1.7↑
1.4↓
1.5↑
1.4↑
↑↔↓: PP compared to 2-3 years ago
0.3↓2.6↑
2.9↓ 4.6↓0.9↓ 0.3↓
BESPOKE CONSUMER SURVEY
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
The changing attitudes towards cuisines Millennials have the biggest changes towards wider variety, healthier and more vegetarian cuisines. 60% of 18-34 customers agree that they are trying out a broader range of cuisines than before, 15pp higher than the average. This reflects Millennial customers being more adventurous and lower risk averse than other age groups. Millennials also strongly over-index for ordering more healthier dishes now and eating more vegetarian food in restaurants and pubs these days, indicating that vegetarianism is becoming more established among younger customers.
To what extent do you agree with following statements?
% of agreement*
150
% of agreement*: strongly agree % + agree slightly%, % of total respondents
Data source: MCA bespoke survey, 2016
I am trying out A BROADER RANGE OF CUISINES than before
I order more 'HEALTHIER' DISHES now
I am eating MORE VEGETARIAN food in restaurants and pubs
these days
Overall , 45%
Overall , 38%
Overall , 22%
60%
49%
33%
43%
35%
18%
35% 33%
17%
18-34s 35-55s 55+ 18-34s 35-55s 55+ 18-34s 35-55s 55+
BESPOKE CONSUMER SURVEY
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Contents
Introduction and background
Executive summary
Market
Competitive landscape
Consumer insight
Consumer typology analysis
Bespoke consumer research
Section summary
Spending drivers
Cuisine preference
Promotional influences
Social media and email contact
Loyalty considerations
Future outlook
151
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
The frequency of using discount vouchers Millennials and customers who eat out more often or spend more these day are frequent discount voucher users. One in five customers use discount vouchers most or all of the time, with 18-34s and customers who eat out more often or spend more strongly over-indexing.
How regularly do you use discount vouchers when eating out?
% of respondents
152
3% 6% 3% 1%8% 6%
17%26%
15%12%
22% 20%
34%
35%
36%31%
32%32%
28%
25%
27%
30%
27%28%
18%8%
20% 25%12% 15%
Average 18-34s 35-55s 55+ Eat out more often these daysSpend more these days
Never
Occasionally
Sometimes
Most of the time
Every time
Data source: MCA bespoke survey, 2016
BESPOKE CONSUMER SURVEY
Eat out more often these days
Spend more these days
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
The impact of vouchers/ promotional dealVouchers and promotional deals have a strong impact Millennials’ decision-making. 50% of 18-34s regularly choose a restaurant based on whether there is a promotional deal available, 10pp higher than the average. This indicates sending promotional codes / deals by email contact list and social media are important and effective ways to boost Millennial customers’ visits.
To what extent do you agree with following statements?
I regularly choose a restaurant based on whether there is a voucher/promotion or deal available
% of respondents
153
55+
18-34s
Total
35-55s
8%
12%
8%
5%
32%
38%
33%
27%
28%
29%
29%
26%
20%
15%
20%
24%
12%
6%
11%
17%
Agree strongly Agree Neither Disagree Disagree strongly
Data source: MCA bespoke survey, 2016
BESPOKE CONSUMER SURVEY
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Contents
Introduction and background
Executive summary
Market
Competitive landscape
Consumer insight
Consumer typology analysis
Bespoke consumer research
Section summary
Spending drivers
Cuisine preference
Promotional influences
Social media and email contact
Loyalty considerations
Future outlook
154
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
The impact of social media Social media has a strong impact on the Millennials but also customers who eat out more often or spend more. On average, 22% of customers agree they follow restaurants on Facebook and Twitter for information and deals, with Millennials and customers who have increased visit frequency and spending on eating out strongly over-indexing.
To what extent do you agree with following statements?
% of respondents
155
I follow restaurants on Facebook and Twitter for information and deals
4% 9% 5% 0%11% 9%
18%
34%
17%
6%
30%24%
14%
20%
15%
7%
13%
14%
21%
16%
24%
24%
19%19%
42%
21%
39%
63%
26%34%
Average 18-34s 35-55s 55+ Eat out more often these daysSpend more these days
Disagree strongly
Disagree
Neither
Agree
Agree strongly
Data source: MCA bespoke survey, 2016
BESPOKE CONSUMER SURVEY
Eat out more often these days
Spend more these days
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
The impact of on email contact list Millennials and customers who have increased eating out frequency and spending strongly over-index among those who have joined an email contact list. The majority of those who sign up for email contact list agree that being on a email contact list does encourage them to visit more often.
To what extent do you agree with following statements?
% of agreement*
156
% of agreement*: strongly agree % + agree slightly%, % of total respondents
Data source: MCA bespoke survey, 2016
I am on the email contact list of 3-5 restaurant/pub companies
I am on the email contact list of more than 5 restaurant/pub
companies
Being on a restaurant/pub brand email contact list does encourage me to visit more
often
Overall , 29% Overall , 19% Overall , 30%
38%
30%
39%
27%
19%
29%
24%
10%
23%
44%
32%
45%
39%
29%
41%
18-34s 35-55s 55+ More frequently
Spending more
18-34s 35-55s 55+ More frequently
Spending more
18-34s 35-55s 55+ More frequently
Spending more
BESPOKE CONSUMER SURVEY
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Contents
Introduction and background
Executive summary
Market
Competitive landscape
Consumer insight
Consumer typology analysis
Bespoke consumer research
Section summary
Spending drivers
Cuisine preference
Promotional influences
Social media and email contact
Loyalty considerations
Future outlook
157
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Branded restaurants are higher quality than five years agoThe majority of customers have recognised that branded restaurants are of a higher quality than five years ago.
To what extent do you agree with following statements?
Branded restaurants are now of much higher quality than 5 years ago
% of respondents
158
7% 10% 6% 5%12% 9%
38%40%
37% 38%
46%44%
43%41%
42% 46%
32%35%
10% 9%13% 9% 9% 10%
2% 1% 3% 2% 1% 2%
Average 18-34s 35-55s 55+ Eat out more often these daysSpend more these days
DisagreeeStronglyDisagree
Neither
Agree
Agree Strongly
Data source: MCA bespoke survey, 2016
Net agreement*33%
Net agreement40%
Net agreement27%
Net agreement32%
Net agreement48%
Net agreement41%
Net agreement* = (% of ‘agree strongly’ + % of ‘agree’) – (% of ‘disagree strongly + % of disagree)
BESPOKE CONSUMER SURVEY
Eat out more often these days
Spend more these days
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Rank Aspects of branded restaurants would encourage customers to regular visit it % of respondents (multiple choice)
1 Convenient location 49.6%
2 Consistent and reliable 44.6%
3 Discounts and promotions 39.0%
4 Great quality / tasty food 31.6%
5 Friendly and engaging Service 18.2%
6 Value for money 15.8%
7 Low prices 14.4%
8 Familiarity 13.6%
9 Favourite cuisine 13.5%
10 Customisable products 13.2%
11 Fast service 10.8%
12 Family friendliness 9.1%
13 Good atmosphere 7.9%
14 Good restaurant environment 6.9%
15 Events e.g. exclusive tastings, new opening parties 2.8%
16 Long opening hours 2.8%
17 Reward card 2.6%
18 Strong customer reviews 1.9%
19 Staff recognise me 1.2%
20 Social media engagement 0.5%
Reasons for regular visits to chain restaurants Convenient location is the most important aspect why a branded restaurant retains customer loyalty. However, this is closely followed by a consistent and reliable food offer.
What are the aspects of a branded restaurant that encourage you to regularly visit it?
Multiple choice, % of respondents
159
Data source: MCA bespoke survey, 2016
BESPOKE CONSUMER SURVEY
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Top 10 branded restaurant aspects to retain the loyalty of 18-34sConsistency and discounts are the joint most important aspects that retain Millennials’ loyalty. 47% of Millennials vote consistent and reliable dining experiences and discounts & promotions as the most important aspects, with both strongly over-indexing against the total customers. Millennials also strongly over-index for customisable products and fast service.
What are the aspects of a branded restaurant that encourage you to regularly visit it?
Multiple choice, % of 18-34 respondents
160
18-34Average
Data source: MCA bespoke survey, 2016
Top 10 aspects for 18-34s
Where 18-34s over-index
47% 47% 45%
23% 23% 18% 15% 13% 13% 11%
Consistent andreliable
Discounts andpromotions
Convenientlocation
Customisableproducts
Great quality /tasty food
Friendly andengagingService
Familiarity Fast service Low prices Favouritecuisine
13%
39% 45%
11% 14%3% 3% 1% 0%
23%
47% 47%
13% 15%4% 4% 2% 1%
Customisableproducts
Discounts andpromotions
Consistent andreliable
Fast service Familiarity Reward card Events e.g.exclusive
tastings, newopening parties
Staff recogniseme
Social mediaengagement
+10pp +8pp +2pp +2pp +1pp +1pp +1pp +1pp+1pp
BESPOKE CONSUMER SURVEY
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
52%42% 42%
34%18% 15% 14% 13% 13% 12%
Convenientlocation
Consistent andreliable
Discounts andpromotions
Great quality /tasty food
Friendly andengagingService
Low prices Favouritecuisine
Familiarity Value formoney
Customisableproducts
Top 10 branded restaurant aspects to retain the loyalty of 35-54sConvenient location is the most important aspect that encourages 35-54s to regularly visit a branded restaurant. Convenient location is voted by 52% of 35-54s, 2pp higher than the average. Discounts and promotions is the third most important aspect, with 35-54s over-indexing. 35-54s are also over-represented for great quality / tasty food and family friendliness.
What are the aspects of a branded restaurant that encourage you to regularly visit it?
Multiple choice, % of 35-54 respondents
161
35-54Average
Data source: MCA bespoke survey, 2016
Top 10 aspects for 35-54s
Where 35-54s over-index
32% 39%50%
9% 8% 13% 14%0%
34% 42% 52%
11% 9% 14% 15%1%
Great quality /tasty food
Discounts andpromotions
Convenientlocation
Family friendliness Good atmosphere Favourite cuisine Low prices Social mediaengagement
+3pp +3pp +2pp +1pp +1pp +1pp +1pp+2pp
BESPOKE CONSUMER SURVEY
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
51% 45%37%
29% 23% 19% 15% 15% 12% 10%
Convenientlocation
Consistent andreliable
Great quality /tasty food
Discounts andpromotions
Value formoney
Friendly andengagingService
Favouritecuisine
Low prices Familiarity Fast service
Top 10 branded restaurant aspects to retain the loyalty of 55+55+ strongly over-index for value for money, great quality / tasty food and environment. 23% of 55+ vote value for money as one of the most important aspects that encourage them to regularly visit brand restaurant, 7pp higher than the total customers. 37% also vote great quality / tasty food as one of the most, 5pp higher than the average. Getting the value for money equation right and skilfully communicating this are important to succeeding among this segment.
What are the aspects of a branded restaurant that encourage you to regularly visit it?
Multiple choice, % of 55+ respondents
162
55+Average
Data source: MCA bespoke survey, 2016
Top 10 aspects for 55+
Where 55+ over-index
16%32%
7% 13%
50%
3%14% 18%23%
37%
10% 15%
51%
4%15% 19%
Value for money Great quality /tasty food
Good restaurantenvironment
Favourite cuisine Convenientlocation
Long openinghours
Low prices Friendly andengaging Service
+7pp +5pp +3pp +2pp +1pp +1pp+1pp +1pp
BESPOKE CONSUMER SURVEY
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
48% 46% 42%27% 22% 18% 17% 14% 12% 12%
Convenientlocation
Discounts andpromotions
Consistent andreliable
Great quality /tasty food
Friendly andengagingService
Customisableproducts
Familyfriendliness
Familiarity Value formoney
Low prices
Top 10 branded restaurant aspects to retain the loyalty of parentsFamily friendliness is key for retaining the loyalty of parents. 22% of parents who have under 18 children at home vote family friendliness as one of the most important aspect of a brand restaurant that encourages them to regularly visit it, 7pp higher than the average. Discounts and promotions is the second most important aspect for parents, and 7pp higher than the average, highlighting some appreciation of the enhanced affordability of eating out that is facilitated by promotional offers.
What are the aspects of a branded restaurant that encourage you to regularly visit it?
Multiple choice, % of 25-54 respondents who have under 18 children at home
163
ParentsAverage
Data source: MCA bespoke survey, 2016
Top 10 aspects for parents
Where parents over-index
9%
39%
13% 18%3% 0%
17%
46%
18% 22%4% 1%
Family friendliness Discounts andpromotions
Customisable products Friendly and engagingService
Events e.g. exclusivetastings, new opening
parties
Social mediaengagement
+7pp +7pp +5pp +1pp+4pp +1pp
BESPOKE CONSUMER SURVEY
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
The aspects that would encourage more often visitsBetter quality / tastier food is the most important aspect of branded restaurant that would encourage customers to visit more.
164
Rank Aspects of branded restaurants would encourage more visits % of respondents (multiple choice)
1 Better quality / tastier food 39%
2 Lower prices 34%
3 Improved value for money 31%
4 More discounts and promotions 26%
5 Wider menu choice 23%
6 Reward card/loyalty scheme 17%
7 Favourite cuisine 15%
8 More convenient location 15%
9 Good restaurant environment 14%
10 More frequent updating of menu assortments 14%
11 More consistent and reliable menu offer 13%
12 More family friendliness 9%
13 Friendlier and more engaging Service 9%
14 Nicer environments 8%
15 Faster service 8%
16 Improved atmosphere 7%
17 More customisable products 6%
18 Staff recognise me 5%
19 More frequent 'club-type' events, e.g. exclusive tastings, new opening/menu parties 4%
20 More social media engagement 3%
Data source: MCA bespoke survey, 2016
What are the aspects of branded restaurants that would encourage you to visit them more often?
Multiple choice, % of respondents
BESPOKE CONSUMER SURVEY
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Top 10 improvements for branded restaurants to target 18-34s18-34s are keener to see fast, friendlier and more engaging service in branded restaurants. For the Top 10 improvement aspects, 18-34s strongly over-index for fast service, friendlier and more engaging service and more customisable products. These attributes are consistent with a high regard for more informal and personalised dining experiences.
What are the aspects of branded restaurants that would encourage you to visit them more often?
Multiple choice, % of 18-34 respondents
165
18-34Average
Data source: MCA bespoke survey, 2016
Top 10 aspects for 18-34s
Where 18-34s over-index
32% 31%27% 25%
20%15% 15% 14% 14% 13%
Better quality /tastier food
Lower prices More discountsand
promotions
Improved valuefor money
Wider menuchoice
Reward card/loyalty scheme
Friendlier andmore engaging
Service
Favouritecuisine
Faster service More frequentupdating of
menuassortments
8% 9% 6% 7% 3% 4%
26%
5% 9%14% 15%10% 10% 5% 6%
27%
6% 10%
Faster service Friendlier andmore engaging
Service
Morecustomisable
products
Improvedatmosphere
More socialmedia
engagement
More frequent'club-type'
events
More discountsand promotions
Staff recogniseme
More familyfriendliness
+6pp +6pp +4pp +3pp +3pp +2pp +1pp +1pp +1pp
BESPOKE CONSUMER SURVEY
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
42% 40%31% 27% 22% 16% 16% 15% 14% 11%
Better quality /tastier food
Lower prices Improved valuefor money
More discountsand
promotions
Wider menuchoice
Rewardcard/loyalty
scheme
Favouritecuisine
Moreconvenient
location
Goodrestaurant
environment
More frequentupdating of
menuassortments
Top 10 improvements for branded restaurants to target 35-54sBetter quality / tastier food and lower prices are the most important aspects that would encourage 35-54s to visit more often. 42% of 35-54s vote better quality / tastier food as the most important aspect, 4 pp higher than the average. Lower prices is the second most important aspect, but is 6pp higher than the average. 35-54s also over-index for more family friendliness, reflecting the greater number of households with children in this age group.
What are the aspects of branded restaurants that would encourage you to visit them more often?
Multiple choice, % of 35-54 respondents
166
35-54Average
Data source: MCA bespoke survey, 2016
Top 10 aspects for 35-54s
Where 35-54s over-index
34% 39%
9%26%
5% 4%15%
40% 42%
11%27%
6% 5%16%
Lower prices Better quality /tastier food
More familyfriendliness
More discounts andpromotions
Staff recognise me More frequent 'club-type' events
Favourite cuisine
+6pp +4pp +2pp +1pp +1pp +1pp +1pp
BESPOKE CONSUMER SURVEY
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
41%35% 30% 25% 24% 19% 18% 17% 17% 16%
Better quality /tastier food
Improved valuefor money
Lower prices Wider menuchoice
More discountsand
promotions
Rewardcard/loyalty
scheme
Moreconvenient
location
Moreconsistent andreliable menu
offer
Goodrestaurant
environment
Favouritecuisine
Top 10 improvements for branded restaurants to target 55+Improved value for money and more consistent and reliable menu offer have a stronger impact on the 55+. Better quality / tastier food is the most important for 55+, but slightly under-indexes compared to the total customers. Improved value for money and lower prices are the second and third most important aspects, with both over-indexing against the average.
What are the aspects of branded restaurants that would encourage you to visit them more often?
Multiple choice, % of 55+ respondents
167
55+Average
Data source: MCA bespoke survey, 2016
Top 10 aspects for 55+
Where 55+ over-index
31%13% 15% 23%
39%
14% 14% 17%8% 15%
35%17% 18% 25%
41%
16% 17% 19%9% 16%
Improvedvalue formoney
Moreconsistent andreliable menu
offer
Moreconvenient
location
Wider menuchoice
Better quality /tastier food
More frequentupdating of
menuassortments
Goodrestaurant
environment
Rewardcard/loyalty
scheme
Nicerenvironments
Favouritecuisine
+4pp +4pp +3pp +2pp +2pp +1pp +1pp+2pp +2pp +2pp
BESPOKE CONSUMER SURVEY
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Introduction and background
Executive summary
Market
Competitive landscape
Consumer insight
Consumer typology analysis
Bespoke consumer research
Future outlook
Contents
168
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
2,901 2,730 2,4808,688 9,318 10,250
17,345 17,900 18,800
22,370 17,510 13,000
5,8327,483 8,960
350 560 841
25,475 25,834 26,120
1,475 1,776 2,0572,770 3,031 3,308
29,987 28,273 26,600
296350 391
4,249 4,725 5,033
2013 2016E 2019F
Branded service-led restaurants
Fine dining
Independent restaurants
Branded traditional fast food
Branded delivery-focused fast food
Independent fast food/takeaway
Branded contemporary fast food
Street food & Mobile vans
Tenanted & leased pubs
Independent & Free of tie pubs
Managed, branded & franchisedpubs
Social clubs
Forecast UK Restaurant market growth by outletsNet closures to continue in Restaurant market. The net decline in outlets will be driven primarily by tenanted & leased pubs and independent restaurants. A slowdown is also expected for the Branded service-led restaurant and Branded delivery-focused fast food segments.
FUTURE OUTLOOK
169
Forecast growth in the UK Restaurant market by outlet numbers by segment, 2013, 2016E & 2019F
121,738 119,491117,670
CAGR 2013-2016E CAGR 2016E-2019F
-0.6% -0.5%
3.6% 2.1%
5.6% 3.7%
-1.9% -2.0%
3.1% 3.0%
6.4% 5.0%
0.5% 0.4%
17.0% 13.7%
8.7% 6.2%
-7.8% -9.5%
1.1% 1.3%
2.4% 3.2%
-2.6% -2.2%
Total Restaurant market
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
£174 £164 £151
£8,992 £9,932 £11,121
£7,059 £7,196£7,545
£5,145 £4,177 £3,159£723 £1,094 £1,611£335 £702
£1,102£4,857 £4,942£4,973£936 £1,275£1,594£3,652
£4,035£4,548
£15,292£14,410
£13,397
£649 £777£880£4,308
£5,150£5,865
2013 2016E 2019F
Branded service-led restaurants
Fine dining
Independent restaurants
Branded traditional fast food
Branded delivery-focused fastfoodIndependent fastfood/takeawayBranded contemporary fastfoodStreet food & Mobile vans
Tenanted & leased pubs
Independent & Free of tie pubs
Managed, branded & franchisedpubsSocial clubs
Forecast UK Restaurant market growth by turnoverValue growth to accelerate slightly over next three years. The total Restaurant market is forecast to reach a turnover CAGR of 1.2% between 2016E-2019F, up from 1.0% between 2013-2016E. Turnover growth is expected to accelerate at Managed, branded & franchised pubs, Independent & Free of tie pubs and Branded traditional fast food. In contrast, a marked slowdown is expected in Branded service-led restaurants.
FUTURE OUTLOOK
170
Forecast growth in the UK Restaurant market by outlet numbers by segment, 2013, 2016E & 2019F
£52,182£53,853
£55,946
CAGR 2013-2016E CAGR 2016E-2019F
1.1% 1.3%
6.1% 4.4%
6.2% 4.2%
-2.0% -2.4%
3.4% 4.1%
10.8% 7.7%
0.6% 0.2%
21.3% 16.0%
14.8% 13.8%
-6.7% -8.9%
0.6% 1.6%
3.4% 3.8%
-2.0% -2.6%
Total Restaurant market
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Share of Restaurant market turnover ad outletsManaged, branded & franchised pubs making biggest gains in share of turnover. The pub segment is set to increase its share by 2.6pp between 2013-2019F. Branded service-led restaurants and street food are also on track to claim a significantly higher share of the market.
FUTURE OUTLOOK
171
2.4% 2.3% 2.1%7.1% 7.8% 8.7%
14.2% 15.0% 15.8%
18.4% 14.7% 11.0%
4.8% 6.3% 7.6%
0.3% 0.5% 0.7%
20.9% 21.6% 22.2%
1.2% 1.5% 1.7%2.3% 2.5% 2.8%
24.6% 23.7% 22.6%
0.2% 0.3% 0.3%3.5% 4.0% 4.3%
2013 2016E 2019F
Branded service-ledrestaurantsFine dining
Independent restaurants
Branded traditional fast food
Branded delivery-focusedfast foodIndependent fastfood/takeawayBranded contemporary fastfoodStreet food & Mobile vans
Tenanted & leased pubs
Independent & Free of tiepubsManaged, branded &franchised pubsSocial clubs 0.3% 0.3% 0.3%
17.3% 18.5% 19.9%
13.5% 13.4% 13.5%
9.9% 7.8% 5.7%1.4% 2.0% 2.9%0.6% 1.1% 1.7%9.3% 9.2% 8.9%1.8% 2.4% 2.9%7.0% 7.5% 8.2%
29.3% 26.8% 24.0%
1.2% 1.4% 1.6%
8.3% 9.6% 10.5%
2013 2016E 2019F
Outlets Turnover
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Restaurant market value growth drivers, 2016E-2019FManaged, branded & franchised pubs the largest contributor to Restaurant market growth over next three years. This is followed by branded service-led restaurants, street food & mobile vans and branded traditional fast food. In contrast, social clubs, independent restaurants and tenanted & leased pubs are the main channels constraining growth in the market.
FUTURE OUTLOOK
172
£1,189
£715
£517 £513
£349 £341 £319
£103£31
-£13
-£1,013 -£1,018
Contribution to Restaurant market growth, 2016E-2019F, by segment, ranked from high to low, £mn
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Forecast sales and outlet growth – service-led restaurantsBranded restaurants to continue outperforming independents, but segment not expected to reach previous highs in growth. The forecast sales CAGR for Branded restaurants for 2016E-2019F is 4.4%, down from 6.1%. Expansion rates are not expected to reach the levels seen in 2013-2015 even with macroeconomic factors improving, as the property market and tightening competition will continue to be barriers to high aggregate growth in the segment. Younger brands with lower outlet counts are expected to see the strongest growth. Driving like-for-like sales improvements will be key for more established brands.
FUTURE OUTLOOK
173
Market segmentSales Growth Outlet Growth
% CAGR13-16E
% CAGR16E-19F
% CAGR13-16E
% CAGR16E-19F
Independent restaurants -2.0% -2.4% -1.9% -2.0%
Fine dining 6.2% 4.2% 5.7% 3.7%
Branded service-led restaurants 6.1% 4.4% 3.6% 2.1%
Total Service-led restaurants 0.1% -0.3% -1.2% -1.3%
Forecast sales and outlet growth, Service-led restaurant segments, 2013-2019F
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Forecast sales and outlet growth – fast foodBranded contemporary fast food to continue enjoying strong growth. MCA forecasts a turnover CAGR of 16.0% for Branded contemporary fast food between 2016E-2019F. While this is down from the previous growth rate of 21.9%, that rate was affected by a low base and average annual growth of 16% is still the fastest in the whole Eating Out market. Rapidly expanding brands, including Five Guys and Leon, are successfully tapping into key consumer trends around convenient yet high quality food.
FUTURE OUTLOOK
174
Market segmentSales Growth Outlet Growth
% CAGR13-16E
% CAGR16E-19F
% CAGR13-16E
% CAGR16E-19F
Independent fast food/take-away 0.6% 0.2% 0.5% 0.4%
Street food & Mobile vans 14.8% 13.8% 8.7% 6.2%
Branded traditional fast food 3.4% 4.1% 3.1% 3.0%
Branded delivery-focused fast food 10.8% 7.7% 6.4% 5.0%
Branded contemporary fast food 21.3% 16.0% 18.1% 13.7%
Total Fast food 4.4% 4.6% 2.5% 2.2%
Forecast sales and outlet growth, Fast food segments, 2013-2019F
Note: Branded delivery-focused fast food defined as branded fast food operators with no or very limited seating in outlets, e.g. Domino’s, Papa John’s and Pizza Hut Delivery.
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Forecast sales and outlet growth – pubsManaged and independent pubs in a strong position to grow. This growth comes on the back of accelerating conversions of tenanted pubs. Yet like-for-likes for several leading, national pub brands are under pressure, and this is expected to continue to be the case over the next few years.
FUTURE OUTLOOK
175
Market segmentSales Growth Outlet Growth
% CAGR13-16E
% CAGR16E-19F
% CAGR13-16E
% CAGR16E-19F
Managed, branded & franchised 3.4% 3.8% 2.4% 3.2%
Tenanted & leased -6.7% -8.9% -7.8% -9.5%
Independent & Free of tie 0.6% 1.6% 1.1% 1.3%
Social clubs -2.0% -2.6% -2.0% -3.2%
Total Pubs 0.2% 0.8% -2.6% -2.2%
Forecast sales and outlet growth, Pub segments, 2013-2019F
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Market growth matrix, 2016E-2019F
FUTURE OUTLOOK
176
INTERNAL EXTERNAL
HIGH IMPORTANCE
LOW IMPORTANCE
MCA believes the key sources of growth will move in the following directions in terms of importance over the next three years. New trading formats, the pace of NPD, premiumisation and hybridisation will all become more important to drive sales as the importance of physical expansion wanes.
PHYSICALEXPANSION
DISCOUNTS & PROMOTIONS
MARKETING INITIATIVES
LONGER TRADING HOURS
PREMIUMISATION HYBRIDISATIONNEW TRADING FORMATS
PACE OF NPD SOCIAL MEDIA
INFLATION
TOURISM & STAYCATIONS
EXPERIENTIAL SHARE OF SPEND
FOODIE CULTURE
DELIVERY
TRADING-UP
POPULATION GROWTH
ALTERNATIVE FUNDING SOURCES
EARLY CAPTURE OF DIGITAL NATIVES
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Market growth drivers summary table
FUTURE OUTLOOK
177
Importance ranking
Growth driver2013-2016 vs 2016-2019 movement in importance
Description
1 Physical expansion Physical expansion rates are believed to have reached a high water market in 2015
2 Longer trading hours The past three years have seen an explosion of breakfast offers
2 Marketing initiatives Marketing will remain a crucial component of driving sales growth
2 Discounts & promotions Discounts & promotions will be less prominent as business confidence improves
3 New trading formats Large groups are eyeing new markets, i.e. Whitbread’s investment in Pure
3 Premiumisation Will grow in importance as operators need to justify higher prices to offset rising costs
3 Hybridisation Pubs doing coffee and coffee/sandwich shops doing alcohol, e.g. Pret ‘Evening’
4 Pace of NPD Faster fashion in food will push operators to speed up NPD
4 Social media Social media can be key to capturing the hearts and minds of millennials
1 Inflation Price inflation will continue to have a major impact on growth in the market
2 Experiential share of spend The trend towards a higher experiential share of spends is only increasing
2 Foodie culture The growing foodie culture in the UK is going from strength to strength
3 Delivery Delivery will only grow in popularity but care must be taken with margin management
3 Trading-up Average spend per visit is expected to keep increasing after 2017
3 Tourism & Staycations The UK will continue to be an attractive tourist destination on the back of a weaker sterling
4 Alternative funding sources Modest growth will come from increased usage of alternative investment sources
4 Population growth Net immigration rates are likely to begin stabilising after early 2017
5Early capture of digital natives
Today’s teenagers will be a key customer segment in 2019 with their own missions & needs
INTE
RN
AL
EXTE
RN
AL
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Growth in Total & Branded Restaurant market, 2013-2019FBranded restaurant market growth rates expected to continue to slow down slightly. MCA expects the Branded restaurant market to see fairly strong growth over the next years, but at a slowing rate. The challenges facing the industry in 2016 – the property market, tightening competition and arguable saturation in certain segments – are unlikely to disappear over the next few years. The total Restaurant market will benefit from the improving performance of independent & free of tie pubs, pushing it to retain a stable 1.3% growth rate in 2018 and 2019.
FUTURE OUTLOOK
Comparative analysis of growth in the Total & Branded Restaurant market, 2013-2019F
178
3.9%
4.5%
5.5%
4.7%4.3%
4.7% 4.6%
2.6%
3.2%
3.8%
3.3%3.1%
3.4% 3.3%
0.2%0.6%
1.4%1.1% 1.0%
1.3% 1.3%
-0.8% -0.7%-0.4%
-0.8% -0.7% -0.6%-0.2%
2013 2014 2015 2016E 2017F 2018F 2019F
Branded Restaurant marketturnover growth
Branded Restaurant market outletgrowth
Total Restaurnat market turnovergrowth
Total Restaurant market outletgrowth
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Customer segmentation – future outlook
179
2016(Total: 50.9m)
2026(Total: 55.0m)
12%(5.9m)
7%(3.6m)
10% (5.1m)
10%(4.9m)
8%(4.2m)
9%(4.6m)
8%(3.9m)
14% (7.4m)
22% (11.4m)
IMPLIED ANNUAL RESTAURANT MARKET SPEND**
£7.0b(16%)
£6.1b(13%)
£6.2b(14%)
£6.4b(14%)
£3.2b(7%)
£4.4b (10%)
£2.5b(6%)
£4.5b (10%)
£5.0b (11%)
10%↓(5.6m)
7%↔(3.7m)
9% ↓(5.2m)
9% ↓(4.8m)
7% ↓(4.1m)
8% ↓(4.5m)
7% ↓(3.8m)
18%↑ (9.8m)
25% ↑ (13.5m)
£7.4b (14% ↓)
£6.8b(13% ↔)
£7.0b(13% ↔)
£7.0b(13% ↓)
£3.5b(7% ↔)
£4.8b(9% ↓)
£2.7b (5% ↓)
£6.6b(13% ↑)
£6.5b(12% ↑)
% OF UK ADULT POPULATION*
2016(Total: 45.3b)
2026(Total: 52.2b)
Notes: *UK adult population: 2016 population is based on ONS most recently released data - population and age group (2014), social grade (2011) and children dependent in household(2011). 2026 population is based on ONS 2014-based national population projections.**Implied annual restaurant market spend: 2016 spend is an estimated UK adult spend (inc. tax) at fast food, branded restaurants, independent restaurants and fine dining across all day-parts; 2026 spend is based on consumer visit frequency remaining the same but the average spend rising by an inflation 1% per annum.
The rise of the Greying Generation and Golden Oldies. The latest projections are 4.5 million more 55+ in ten years’ time. Assuming no change in visit frequency and average spend only rising by 1% per annual, the implied restaurant expenditure for the G segments will rise by £3.5b or 4pp to a 25% share. In reality and importantly, this rise is likely to be greater with more youthful and more frequent eating out behaviours being maintained for longer as consumers age.
FUTURE OUTLOOK
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Future outlook – visit frequency and spendHigher spend and wider repertoires but lower eating out frequencies. Over the next 12 months, 12% of customers will increase eating out frequency in contrast to 18% who will reduce frequency. 30% will increase the total spending on eating out, 12pp higher than proportion who will reduce the spending. 31% will increase the number / variety of restaurants, 18pp higher than those who will reduce.
Over the next 12 months…
% of respondents
180
Data source: MCA bespoke survey, 2016
My eating out frequency will be My total spending on eating out
will be The number / variety of
restaurants I visit will
12%
65%
18%
5%
Don't know
Less often
The same
More often
4%
26%
46%
11%
7%
7%
Don't know
Fallen significantly
Fallen slightly
Remained unchanged
Increased slightly
Increased significantly
4%
27%
50%
10%
3%6%
Don't know
Fallen significantly
Fallen slightly
Remained unchanged
Increased slightly
Increased significantly
FUTURE OUTLOOK
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Future outlook – customer confidence indicators 55+ customers are more confident in the economy. 55+ strongly over-index for not having any concerns about job security and are broadly optimistic about the outlook for the UK economy over the next 12-18 months. By contrast, Millennials are over-represented for thinking their household finances are going to stretch further over the next 12 months.
To what extend do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
% of respondents
181
Data source: MCA bespoke survey, 2016
I do not have any concerns about my job security
I am broadly optimistic about the outlook for the UK economy over the
next 12-18 months
I think my household finances are going to stretch further over the next 12
months
% of agreement*: strongly agree % + agree slightly%, % of total respondents
Overall, 46% Overall, 42%
Overall, 32%
43%40% 42%40%
36%33%
55%51%
22%
18-34s 35-55s 55+ 18-34s 35-55s 55+ 18-34s 35-55s 55+
FUTURE OUTLOOK
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Future outlook – potential business development ideasThe top customer wish list include reducing prices for larger groups and more sharing platters on the menu. 56% of customers agree that it would be a good idea if prices were reduced for large groups. 51% agree that if more sharing platters were on menus, against only 16% of disagreement.
It would be a good idea if … how much do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
% of respondents
182
14% 9% 13% 11% 9% 11%
42%42% 33% 38%
31% 28%
29% 33%37% 28% 40% 34%
11% 11% 14%14%
15%16%
4% 5% 4% 9% 5% 10%
Prices were reducedfor larger groups
More sharingplatters were on
menus
Bills includedshowing how muchthe meal costs on a
per person basis
More seafood andfish is included on
menus
More restaurantsoffer breakfast
More vegetarianlines are offered on
menus
Disagree Strongly
Disagree
Neither
Agree
Agree Strongly
Data source: MCA bespoke survey, 2016
Net agreement*41%
Net agreement* = (% of ‘agree strongly’ + % of ‘agree’) – (% of ‘disagree strongly + % of disagree)
Net agreement36%
Net agreement28%
Net agreement25%
Net agreement20%
Net agreement14%
FUTURE OUTLOOK
MCA | RESTAURANT MARKET REPORT © 2016
Catching up with friends more than before Eating out to catch up with friends is a key driver. Overall, 38% of respondents agree that they are going out to eat as a way to catch up with friends more than before, with 18-34s and customers who eat out more often these day or spend more these days strongly over-indexing.
To what extent do you agree with following statement?
% of respondents
183
7% 11% 6% 4%15% 11%
31%
42%
30%23%
47%42%
33%
29%
34%
35%
17%26%
18%
12%
17%23%
14% 15%
12% 6%13% 15%
7% 7%
Average 18-34s 35-55s 55+ Eat out more often these daysSpend more these days
DisagreeeStronglyDisagree
Neither
Agree
Agree Strongly
Data source: MCA bespoke survey, 2016
I'm going out to eat as a way to catch up with friends more than before
Eat out more often these days
Spend more these days
MCA – Key contacts:
Sophie Barber, Sales & Marketing Manager
Peter Linden, Market Analysis Manger