Mc farlan's strategic grid

8
MCFARLAN'S STRATEGIC GRID -MANISH CHAURASIA(15030141085)

Transcript of Mc farlan's strategic grid

Page 1: Mc farlan's strategic grid

MCFARLAN'S STRATEGIC GRID

-MANISH CHAURASIA(15030141085)

Page 2: Mc farlan's strategic grid

MCFARLAN'S STRATEGIC GRID

McFarlan (1984) proposed the strategic grid that allows the visualization of the relationship between IT strategy and business strategy and operations.

This model analyses the impacts of IT existent applications (present) and of applications portfolio (future), defining four boxes, with each representing one possible role for IT in the enterprise: “Support,” “Factory,” “Turnaround,” and “Strategic” .

Page 3: Mc farlan's strategic grid

MCFARLAN'S STRATEGIC GRID

Page 4: Mc farlan's strategic grid

MCFARLAN'S STRATEGIC GRID

• The strategic grid model is an IT specific model that can be used to assess the nature of the projects that the IT organization has in its portfolio with the aim of seeing how well that portfolio supports the operational and strategic interests of the firm.

The X-axis:

• The X axis represents impact of the project on IT strategy. One way of expressing what we mean by this is: what options does this project offer the firm by way of affecting one of Porter’s five forces in our favour?

• Does it change the nature of competition in our market.

• Does it enable us to offer completely new products and services, or enable us to substitute one of ours for one of someone else’s in the eyes of their customers?

Page 5: Mc farlan's strategic grid

MCFARLAN'S STRATEGIC GRID

The Y-axis:

• The Y axis represents the impact of the project on IT operations.   One way of expressing this is to say that projects that are high on this axis improve the efficiency or quality of our existing systems and business processes, or lower their costs.

• McFarlan divided the grid into 4 quadrants

• Support

• Factory

• Turnaround

• Strategic

Page 6: Mc farlan's strategic grid

MCFARLAN'S STRATEGIC GRID

Support:

• Low operational impact, low strategic impact. This quadrant is about local process improvements for individual users.

Factory:

• High operational impact, low strategic impact. This quadrant is about operational improvements that affect large portions of the firm, and are aimed at improving performance or decreasing cost.

Page 7: Mc farlan's strategic grid

MCFARLAN'S STRATEGIC GRID

Turnaround:

• Low operational impact, high strategic impact. This quadrant is about exploiting new technologies to provide strategic opportunities.

Strategic:

• High operational impact, high strategic impact. IT organizations that have most projects in this quadrant understand that IT can both improve core operations of the firm while simultaneously generating strategic options.

Page 8: Mc farlan's strategic grid

MCFARLAN'S STRATEGIC GRID EXAMPLE