Maxillary restoration with complete maxillary prosthesis ...
Maxillary and Periorbital Fractures
Transcript of Maxillary and Periorbital Fractures
![Page 1: Maxillary and Periorbital Fractures](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052318/587a78061a28abfd7e8b4aed/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Maxillary and Periorbital Fractures
Resident: Gordon Shields, MD
Faculty Advisor: Francis Quinn, Jr, MD, FACS
The University of Texas Medical Branch
Department of Otolaryngology
Grand Rounds Presentation
January 7, 2003
![Page 2: Maxillary and Periorbital Fractures](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052318/587a78061a28abfd7e8b4aed/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Types
Mechanisms
Associated Injuries
Anatomy
Classification
Evaluation
Treatment
![Page 3: Maxillary and Periorbital Fractures](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052318/587a78061a28abfd7e8b4aed/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Types
LeFort or Maxillary fractures
Zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures
Orbitozygomaticomaxillary complex fractures
![Page 4: Maxillary and Periorbital Fractures](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052318/587a78061a28abfd7e8b4aed/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Mechanisms
Assault
MVA
Gunshot wounds
Sports
Falls
Industrial accidents
![Page 5: Maxillary and Periorbital Fractures](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052318/587a78061a28abfd7e8b4aed/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Associated Injuries
Brandt et al 1991
59% caused by MVA had intracranial injury
10% caused by fall/beating had intracranial injury
![Page 6: Maxillary and Periorbital Fractures](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052318/587a78061a28abfd7e8b4aed/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Associated injuries
Haug et al 1990
402 patients
Zygoma fractures:
– Lacerations 43%
– Orthopedic injuries 32%
– Additional facial fractures 22%
– Neurologic injury 27%
– Pulmonary, abdominal, cardiac 7%, 4.1%, 1%
![Page 7: Maxillary and Periorbital Fractures](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052318/587a78061a28abfd7e8b4aed/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Maxillary fractures:
– Lacerations and abrasions 75%
– Orthopedic injury 51%
– Other facial fractures 42%
– Neurologic injury 51%
– Pulmonary 13%, abdominal 5.7%, cardiac 3.8%
![Page 8: Maxillary and Periorbital Fractures](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052318/587a78061a28abfd7e8b4aed/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Ocular injury
Al-Qurainy et al 1991
363 patients with midface fractures
– 63% minor or transient ocular injury
– 16% moderately severe injury
– 12% severe ocular injury (angle recession, retinal or vitreous injury, optic nerve damage
– 90.6% of patients had some ocular injury
– 2.5% lost vision in the affected eye
![Page 9: Maxillary and Periorbital Fractures](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052318/587a78061a28abfd7e8b4aed/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Facial Skeleton
From: Netter FH. Atlas of Human Anatomy. Second Edition; East Hanover, Novartis,1997, plt. 1
![Page 10: Maxillary and Periorbital Fractures](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052318/587a78061a28abfd7e8b4aed/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Facial Skeleton
From: Netter FH. Atlas of Human Anatomy. Second Edition; East Hanover, Novartis,1997, plt. 2
![Page 11: Maxillary and Periorbital Fractures](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052318/587a78061a28abfd7e8b4aed/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Orbit
7 bones composing the orbit: frontal, sphenoid, zygoma, maxilla, palatine, lacrimal, ethmoid
From: Netter FH. Atlas of Human Anatomy. Second Edition; East Hanover, Novartis,1997, plt. 1
![Page 12: Maxillary and Periorbital Fractures](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052318/587a78061a28abfd7e8b4aed/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Forces of mastication
From: Banks P, Brown A. Fractures of the Facial Skeleton, Oxford, Wright 2001 pg.6
![Page 13: Maxillary and Periorbital Fractures](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052318/587a78061a28abfd7e8b4aed/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Facial Buttress system
From :Stanley RB. Maxillary and Periorbital Fractures. In :Bailey BJ ed., Head and Neck Surgery-Otolaryngology, third edition, Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2001, pg 777.
![Page 14: Maxillary and Periorbital Fractures](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052318/587a78061a28abfd7e8b4aed/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Facial Buttress system
From: Celin SE. Fractures of the Upper Facial and Midfacial Skeleton. In: Myers EN ed., Operative Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Philadelphia, WB Saunders Company 1997:1143-1192.
![Page 15: Maxillary and Periorbital Fractures](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052318/587a78061a28abfd7e8b4aed/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Facial buttress system
From: Rowe NL, Williams JL. Maxillofacial Injuries. Edinburgh, Churchill Livingstone,1985, pg 19.
![Page 16: Maxillary and Periorbital Fractures](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052318/587a78061a28abfd7e8b4aed/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
LeFort fractures
Rene LeFort 1901 in cadaver skulls
Based on the most superior level
Frequently different levels on either side
LeFort I
LeFort II
LeFort III
![Page 17: Maxillary and Periorbital Fractures](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052318/587a78061a28abfd7e8b4aed/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
From: Dolan KD, Jacoby CG, Smoker WR. Radiology of Facial Injury. New York, MacMillian Publishing Company 1988, pg76.
![Page 18: Maxillary and Periorbital Fractures](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052318/587a78061a28abfd7e8b4aed/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Modified LeFort Classification
From: Marciani RD. Management of Midface Fractures: fifty years later. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1993;51:962.
![Page 19: Maxillary and Periorbital Fractures](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052318/587a78061a28abfd7e8b4aed/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
From: Marciani RD. Management of Midface Fractures: fifty years later. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1993;51:962.
![Page 20: Maxillary and Periorbital Fractures](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052318/587a78061a28abfd7e8b4aed/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Donat, Endress, Mathog classification
From: Donat TL et al. Facial Fracture Classification According to Skeletal Support Mechanisms. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1998;124:1306-1314.
![Page 21: Maxillary and Periorbital Fractures](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052318/587a78061a28abfd7e8b4aed/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Evaluation
ABC’s
History
Palpation of entire facial skeleton
Occlusion
Ophthalmologic exam / consultation
C-spine
Imaging – CT
![Page 22: Maxillary and Periorbital Fractures](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052318/587a78061a28abfd7e8b4aed/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Imaging
CT has surpassed plain film xray
Allows precise diagnosis and surgical planning
Axial and coronal cuts
![Page 23: Maxillary and Periorbital Fractures](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052318/587a78061a28abfd7e8b4aed/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
From: Som PM, Curtin HD. Head and Neck Imaging;. Fourth Edition; St. Louis, Mosby 2003, pg 386.
![Page 24: Maxillary and Periorbital Fractures](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052318/587a78061a28abfd7e8b4aed/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
From: Som PM, Curtin HD. Head and Neck Imaging;. Fourth Edition; St. Louis, Mosby 2003, pg 387.
![Page 25: Maxillary and Periorbital Fractures](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052318/587a78061a28abfd7e8b4aed/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
From: Som PM, Curtin HD. Head and Neck Imaging;. Fourth Edition; St. Louis, Mosby 2003, pg 393.
![Page 26: Maxillary and Periorbital Fractures](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052318/587a78061a28abfd7e8b4aed/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
![Page 27: Maxillary and Periorbital Fractures](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052318/587a78061a28abfd7e8b4aed/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Treatment of maxillary fractures
Early repair
Single-stage
Extended access approaches
Rigid fixation
Immediate bone grafting
Re-suspension of soft tissues
![Page 28: Maxillary and Periorbital Fractures](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052318/587a78061a28abfd7e8b4aed/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Maxillary fractures
Steps of reconstruction-Rohrich and Shewmake
Reestablish facial height and width
IMF with ORIF of mandible
Zygomatic arch reconstruction restores facial width and projection
Reconstruction continues from stable bone to unstable and from lateral to medial
![Page 29: Maxillary and Periorbital Fractures](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052318/587a78061a28abfd7e8b4aed/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Internal fixation vs. traditional methods
Klotch et al 1987
43 patients
22 treated with ORIF using AO miniplates
21 treated with combination of intermaxillary fixation, and/or interosseous wiring, and/or primary bone grafting
![Page 30: Maxillary and Periorbital Fractures](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052318/587a78061a28abfd7e8b4aed/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Most severe injuries in rigid internal fixation group
Shorter IMF, early return to diet, lower percentage of tracheotomy
No plate infections
![Page 31: Maxillary and Periorbital Fractures](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052318/587a78061a28abfd7e8b4aed/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Haug et al 1995
134 patients treated by maxillomandibular fixation or rigid internal fixation
Postoperative problems in 60% vs 64%
![Page 32: Maxillary and Periorbital Fractures](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052318/587a78061a28abfd7e8b4aed/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Complication rates similar
Rigid fixation has benefits:
– Airway protection
– Enhanced nutrition
– More rapid return to pretraumatic function
![Page 33: Maxillary and Periorbital Fractures](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052318/587a78061a28abfd7e8b4aed/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Approaches
Circumvestibular
Facial degloving
Bicoronal
Transconjuctival
![Page 34: Maxillary and Periorbital Fractures](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052318/587a78061a28abfd7e8b4aed/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
From: Haug RH, Buchbinder D. Incisions For Access to Craniomaxillofacial Fractures. Atlas of the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics of North America 1993;1(2):23.
![Page 35: Maxillary and Periorbital Fractures](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052318/587a78061a28abfd7e8b4aed/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
From: Haug RH, Buchbinder D. Incisions For Access to Craniomaxillofacial Fractures. Atlas of the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics of North America 1993;1(2):25.
![Page 36: Maxillary and Periorbital Fractures](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052318/587a78061a28abfd7e8b4aed/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Bicoronal approach
From: Celin SE. Fractures of the Upper Facial and Midfacial Skeleton. In: Myers EN ed., Operative Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Philadelphia, WB Saunders Company 1997:1143-1192.
![Page 37: Maxillary and Periorbital Fractures](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052318/587a78061a28abfd7e8b4aed/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
From: Cheney ML. Facial Surgery: Plastic and Reconstructive. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins 1997.
![Page 38: Maxillary and Periorbital Fractures](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052318/587a78061a28abfd7e8b4aed/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
From: Celin SE. Fractures of the Upper Facial and Midfacial Skeleton. In: Myers EN ed., Operative Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Philadelphia, WB Saunders Company 1997:1143-1192.
![Page 39: Maxillary and Periorbital Fractures](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052318/587a78061a28abfd7e8b4aed/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
![Page 40: Maxillary and Periorbital Fractures](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052318/587a78061a28abfd7e8b4aed/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Treatment of Zygomaticomaxillary Complex fractures
Restore pre-injury facial configuration
Prevent cosmetic deformity
Prevent delayed visual disturbances
Repair within 5-7 days allows edema to decrease and avoids shortening of masseter with lateral and inferior rotation
![Page 41: Maxillary and Periorbital Fractures](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052318/587a78061a28abfd7e8b4aed/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Soft diet and malar protection
Closed reduction
ORIF with plating of one to four buttresses
Provide fixation as necessary for stable reduction
![Page 42: Maxillary and Periorbital Fractures](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052318/587a78061a28abfd7e8b4aed/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Ellis and Kittidumkerng 1996 48 patients Reduced fracture with Carroll-Girard screw
– 4.2% closed reductions – 31.2 % one point fixation – 27.1% two point fixation – 27.1% three point fixation – 10.4% four point fixation – Used exposure and fixation needed to provide
stable reduction
![Page 43: Maxillary and Periorbital Fractures](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052318/587a78061a28abfd7e8b4aed/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Approaches to FZ buttress
From: Strong EB, Sykes JM. Zygoma Complex Fractures. Facial Plastic Surgery 1990;14(1):108.
![Page 44: Maxillary and Periorbital Fractures](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052318/587a78061a28abfd7e8b4aed/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Approaches to orbital floor
From: Strong EB, Sykes JM. Zygoma Complex Fractures. Facial Plastic Surgery 1990;14(1):109.
![Page 45: Maxillary and Periorbital Fractures](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052318/587a78061a28abfd7e8b4aed/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
From: Strong EB, Sykes JM. Zygoma Complex Fractures. Facial Plastic Surgery 1990;14(1):109.
![Page 46: Maxillary and Periorbital Fractures](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052318/587a78061a28abfd7e8b4aed/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Orbital exploration
Shumrick et al 1997
97 patient with either ZMC or midface fractures
All explored had significant traumatic disruptions, no enopthalmos or diplopia in those not explored
Based on their 7 criteria 22 ZMC and 11 midface underwent orbital exploration
![Page 47: Maxillary and Periorbital Fractures](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052318/587a78061a28abfd7e8b4aed/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Persistent diplopia which failed to improve in 7 or more days, positive forced duction testing, radiologic evidence of perimuscular tissue entrapment
Cosmetically significant and clinically apparent enophthalmos associated with abnormal radiological findings
![Page 48: Maxillary and Periorbital Fractures](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052318/587a78061a28abfd7e8b4aed/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Radiological evidence of significant comminution and or displacment of the orbital rim
Radiological evidence of significant displacement or comminution of greater than 50% of the orbital floor with herniation of soft tissue into maxillary sinus
![Page 49: Maxillary and Periorbital Fractures](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052318/587a78061a28abfd7e8b4aed/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Combined orbital floor and medial wall defects with soft tissue displacement noted radiologically on CT scans
Radiological evidence of a fracture or comminution of the body of the zygoma itself as determined by CT
Physical or radiological evidence of exophthalmos or orbital content impingement caused by displaced periorbital fractures
![Page 50: Maxillary and Periorbital Fractures](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052318/587a78061a28abfd7e8b4aed/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Repair of the orbit
Approaches
– Transconjunctival with or without lateral canthotomy/cantholysis
– Subciliary
– Transconjunctival has lower incidence of ectropion/entropion
![Page 51: Maxillary and Periorbital Fractures](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052318/587a78061a28abfd7e8b4aed/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
Materials for reconstruction
Autogenous tissues
– Avoid risk of infected implant
– Additional operative time, donor site morbidity , graft absorption
– Calvarial bone, iliac crest, rib, septal or auricular cartilage
![Page 52: Maxillary and Periorbital Fractures](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052318/587a78061a28abfd7e8b4aed/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
Alloplastic implants
– Decreased operative time, easily available, no donor site morbidity, can provide stable support
– Risk of infection 0.4-7%
– Gelfilm, polygalactin film, silastic, marlex mesh, teflon, prolene, polyethylene, titanium
![Page 53: Maxillary and Periorbital Fractures](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052318/587a78061a28abfd7e8b4aed/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Ellis and Tan 2003
– 58 patients, compared titanium mesh with cranial bone graft
– Used postoperative CT to assess adequacy of reconstruction
– Titanium mesh group subjectively had more accurate reconstruction
![Page 54: Maxillary and Periorbital Fractures](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052318/587a78061a28abfd7e8b4aed/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
Soft tissue resuspension
Wide exposure allows more accurate fracture reduction but may lead to problems in soft tissue covering of face
Need to close periosteum and provide suspension sutures to prevent descent of soft tissues
![Page 55: Maxillary and Periorbital Fractures](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052318/587a78061a28abfd7e8b4aed/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
Conclusions
High index of suspicion for associated injuries- especially ocular
Assessment of buttress system
Wide exposure via cosmetically acceptable incisions
Rigid fixation
Soft tissue resuspension