Mauro Anselmino Torino University and INFN · 2006-12-22 · Mauro Anselmino Torino University and...
Transcript of Mauro Anselmino Torino University and INFN · 2006-12-22 · Mauro Anselmino Torino University and...
Mauro AnselminoTorino University
and INFN
Theory overview on transversity(The long way to transversity in SIDIS)
Azimuthal asymmetries and PhT dependence in nnunpolarized SIDIS and in dσLL
Learning about the quark intrinsic motion
SSA, Sivers and Collins effects
Collins functions from BELLE data
Coupling Collins function and transversity
JLab, Dec. 14, 2006
Work in collaboration with: M. Boglione, U. D’Alesio, A. Efremov, A. Kotzinian, F. Murgia, B. Parsamyan, A. Prokudin, C. Türk
Polarized SIDIS cross section, up to subleading order in 1/Q
[ ]
( )⎭⎬⎫⎥⎦
⎤⎢⎣
⎡−++−+
+−+
−+++⎩⎨⎧
−+
⎭⎬⎫
⎩⎨⎧
⎥⎦
⎤⎢⎣
⎡++++
+++=
151413
12S
11
1098
7654
3210
)2cos( cos1 )cos(
sin )2sin(1
)3sin( )sin( )sin(
cos1 sin1 2sin
sin1 cos1 2cos
LTShLTSLTShe
UTUTSh
UTShUTShUTShT
LLhLLeULhULhL
LUheUUhUUhUU
dΦΦdΦQ
dΦΦ
dΦdΦΦQ
dΦΦdΦΦdΦΦS
dΦQ
ddΦQ
dΦS
dΦQ
dΦQ
dΦdd
σσσλ
σσ
σσσ
σσλσσ
σλσσσσ
Kotzinian, NP B441 (1995) 234
Mulders and Tangermann, NP B461 (1996) 197
Boer and Mulders, PR D57 (1998) 5780
Bacchetta et al., PL B595 (2004) 309
Bacchetta et al., hep-ph/0611265
Unpolarized SIDIS with intrinsic k┴
);,();,(ˆd);,(d 222 QpzDQyQkxf hq
lqlqq q
lhXlp⊥⊥
→⊥
→ ⊗⊗=∑ kσσ
factorization holds at large Q2, and QCDT kP Λ≈≈ ⊥ Ji, Ma, Yuan
qpQxB ⋅
=2
2
22 qQ −=
plqpy
⋅⋅
=
qPPPz h
h ⋅⋅
=
Exact kinematics
struck parton carries 4-momentum k
k
P
k’
02 =k
ql
l′
) ,0 ,0 ,( 00 PPP −=
⎥⎦
⎤⎢⎣
⎡−−=+= ⊥ ϕcos121)(ˆ 2 y
Qksxkls
⎥⎥⎦
⎤
⎢⎢⎣
⎡
−−−−=′−= ⊥ ϕcos
121)1( )(ˆ 2
yQkysxklu
22)(ˆ Qllt −=′−=
neglecting terms one has
PT = p┴ + z k┴hB zzxx ==
⎟⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛−−−−+=+∝ ⊥→ ϕσ cos1)2(4)1(1ˆˆˆ 2
2
422 yy
Qky
yQusd lqlq
“Cahn effect”
hh
lhXlp
ΦBAΦ
cosd
d+∝
→σ
assuming:
one finds:
with
clear dependence on (assumed to be constant)and
Find best values by fitting data on Φh and PT dependences
EMC data, µp and µd, E between 100 and 280 GeV
M.A., M. Boglione, U. D’Alesio, A. Kotzinian, F. Murgia and A. Prokudin
Large PT data explained by NLO QCD corrections
EMC data
dashed line: parton model with unintegrated distribution and fragmentation functions solid line: pQCD contributions at LO and a K factor (K = 1.5) to account for NLO effects
Longitudinal polarization (here means along the lepton direction)
γγ ϑϑ cos 12
sin implies , SSQ
yxmSSS L
NT ±=
−±≅±=⇐⇒
helicity-helicity) ,( 76
LLLL dd σσ
helicity-ST
)( 13LTdσ
),( ⊥Δ kxq
),(/ TqS SsxfT
rr⋅Δ +
−+++ − σσ ˆˆ dd
−+++ − σσ ˆˆ dd
⎟⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛−−−=−∝− ⊥−+++ ϕσσ cos14)2(ˆˆˆˆ 2
422 yy
Qkyy
yQusdd
Cahn effect
study
assuming
notice: different average for different distributions⟩⟨ ⊥2k
⟩⟨= ⊥22
0 kμ
⟩⟨= ⊥22 pDμ
⟩⟨≤ ⊥22
2,1 kμ
sensitive to the relative values of and , intrinsic k┴ of quarksinside an unpolarized or a longitudinally polarized proton
20μ
22μ
COMPASS: positive (h+), all (h) and negative (h–) hadron production, Q2 > 1.0 (GeV/c)2, W2 > 25 GeV2, 0.1 < x < 0.6, 0.5 < y < 0.9 and 0.4 < z < 0.9
HERMES: π+, π0 and π– production, Q2 > 1.0 (GeV/c)2, W2 > 10 GeV2, 0.1 < x < 0.6, 0.45 < y < 0.85 and 0.4 < z < 0.7
JLab at 6 GeV: π+, π0 and π– production, Q2 > 1.0 (GeV/c)2, W2 > 4 GeV2,0.2 < x < 0.6, 0.4 < y < 0.85 and 0.4 < z < 0.7
M. A., A. Efremov, A. Kotzinian and B. Parsamyan
Predicted dependence of ALL on PhT , for scattering off a proton target, with different choices of μ22:
0.1 (GeV/c)2 – continuous, 0.17 (GeV/c)2 – dashed and 0.25 (GeV/c)2 – dot-dashed lines.
Predicted dependence of ALL on PhT , for scattering off a deuteron (and neutron for JLab) target, with different choices of μ2
2:0.1 (GeV/c)2 – continuous, 0.17 (GeV/c)2 – dashed and 0.25 (GeV/c)2 – dot-dashed lines.
Cahn effect
contains new function, needs assumptions and approximations:
Predicted dependence of on PhT for scattering off a proton target with different choices of μ22:
0.1 (GeV/c)2 – continuous, 0.17 (GeV/c)2 – dashed and 0.25 (GeV/c)2 – dot-dashed lines.Each line splits into three almost overlapping lines corresponding, for each value of μ2
2, to three different values of μ1
2 = (up-down) 0.1, 0.15 and 0.2 (GeV/c)2.
hLLA φcos
Predicted dependence of on x, y and z, for proton, neutron and deuteron targets, for JLab.hLLA φ cos
⊥⊥ −≅ kPp zT
)ˆˆ( ),(21
),(),(
/
//
⊥⊥
⊥⊥
×⋅Δ
+=
↑
↑
kpS
k
kxf
kxfxf
pqN
pqpq
Sivers effect in SIDIS
∑ ∫
∑ ∫
∫∫
⊥
→
⊥⊥
⊥
→
⊥⊥
↓↑
↓↑−
−−Δ=
+
−−≡
↑
qhq
lqlq
pqSh
Shhq
lqlq
SpqN
q Sh
Sh
ShShΦΦUT
pzDdQ
dkxfddΦdΦ
ΦΦpzDdQ
dΦkxfddΦdΦ
dddΦdΦ
ΦΦdddΦdΦA Sh
),(ˆ
),(
)sin( ),(ˆ
)sin( ),(
][
)sin(] [ 2
2/2
2/2
)sin(
σ
σϕ
σσ
σσ
k
k
qTpq
N fMkf ⊥⊥−=Δ
↑ 1/
2
Parameterization of the Sivers function
11 ≤≤− qN
q = u, d. The Sivers function for sea quarks and antiquarksis assumed to be zero.
M.A., M. Boglione, U.D’Alesio, A.Kotzinian, F. Murgia, A Prokudin
from Sivers mechanism)sin( S
UTA Φ−Φ
Deuteron target ( )( )hd
hupd
Npu
NUT DDffA Sh +Δ+Δ∝ ↑↑
Φ−Φ 4 //
)sin(
First p┴ moments of extracted Sivers
functions, comparedwith models
M.A, M. Boglione, U. D’Alesio, A. Kotzinian, F. Murgia, A. Prokudin
data from HERMES and COMPASS
),( 4
/2
)1(1
)1(
⊥⊥
⊥
↑Δ
=−=Δ
∫ kxfmkkd
ff
pqN
p
qTq
N
hep-ph/0511017
?11d
Tu
T ff ⊥⊥ −=
The first and 1/2-transverse moments of the Sivers quark distribution functions, defined in Eqs. (3, 9), as extracted in Refs. [20, 21, 23]. The fits were constrained mainly (or solely) by the preliminary HERMES data in the indicated x-range. The curves indicate the 1-σ regions
of the various parameterizations.
),( )( 12)2/1(
1 ⊥⊥⊥
⊥⊥ ∫= kxf
Mkdxf q
Tq
T k
M. Anselmino, M. Boglione, J.C. Collins, U. D’Alesio, A.V. Efremov, K. Goeke, A. Kotzinian, S. Menze, A. Metz, F. Murgia, A. Prokudin, P. Schweitzer, W. Vogelsang, F. Yuan
),( 2
12
22)1(
1 ⊥⊥⊥
⊥⊥ ∫= kxf
Mkdf q
Tq
T k
Predictions for π0 production at HERMES
Predictions for K production at HERMES …
… and comparison with data. Role of s quarks?
Predictions for COMPASS, hydrogen target
suggested kinematical cuts:Q2 > 1 (GeV/c)2 W2 > 25 GeV2
PT > 0.1 GeV/c Eh > 4 GeV0.2 < zh < 0.9 0.1 < y < 0.9
predictions for JLab, proton target, 6 GeV
0.4 ≤ zh ≤ 0.7 0.02 ≤ PT ≤ 1 GeV/c 0.1 ≤ xB ≤ 0.6 0.4 ≤ y ≤ 0.85 Q2 ≥ 1 (GeV/c)2 W2 ≥ 4 GeV2 1 ≤ Eh ≤ 4 GeV
predictions for JLab, proton target, 12 GeV
0.4 ≤ zh ≤ 0.7 0.02 ≤ PT ≤ 1.4 GeV/c 0.05 ≤ xB ≤ 0.7 0.2 ≤ y ≤ 0.85 Q2 ≥ 1 (GeV/c)2 W2 ≥ 4 GeV2 1 ≤ Eh ≤ 7 GeV
predictions for JLab, neutron target, 6 GeV
Collins mechanism for SSA
Asymmetry in the fragmentation of a transversely polarized quark )ˆˆ( ),(
21
),(),(
/
//
⊥⊥
⊥⊥
×⋅Δ
+=
↑
↑
ppS
p
qqqhN
qhqh
pzD
pzDzD
initial q spin is transferred tofinal q', which fragments
)sin()ˆˆ( '' Shqq ΦΦ +∝×⋅ ⊥ppS
q
q’
(neglecting intrinsic motionin partonic distributions)
q
hqh
N HMzpD ⊥⊥=Δ ↑ 1/
2
ShC ΦΦΦ −−= π
x
y
α αCΦ
SΦ hΦ
qS
q′S
ll ′−
∫∫
↓↑
↓↑+
+
+−≡
][
)sin( ]d[d 2)sin(
σσ
σσ
dddΦdΦ
ΦΦdΦdΦA
Sh
ShShΦΦUT
Sh
Collins effect in SIDIS
),( ),(
ˆ
)sin(),(ˆ
),(
//22
/212
)sin(
∑ ∫
∑ ∫
⊥⊥
→
⊥
⊥
→
⊥⊥
+
+ΔΔ
=
↑
q pqpq
lqlq
Sh
q ShqhN
lqlq
qSh
ΦΦUT
pzDkxfdQ
dddΦdΦ
ΦΦzDdQ
dkxhddΦdΦ
A Sh
σ
σ
k
pk
:or 1 qh Tq Δ transversity distribution
↓↑↑↑ →→ −=Δ lqlqlqlq ddd σσσ ˆˆˆ
)ˆˆ( ),(),(// ⊥⊥⊥ ×⋅Δ=Δ
↑↑ppSp qqqh
Nqh
N pzDzD
fit to HERMES data on)sin( Sh
UTA Φ+Φ
W. Vogelsang and F. Yuan
Soffer-saturated h1 ( ) ||2 1 qqh +Δ=
A. V. Efremov, K. Goeke and P. Schweitzer(h1 from quark-soliton model)
e+e- CMS frame: GeV 52.10 ,2== s
sEz h
Xhhqqee −+−+ →→
e+
BELLE @ KEK
ϕ1
1hPr
2hPrϕ2−π e-
e+
thrust-axis
z
y
x
1⊥pr
2⊥pr θ
Collins function from e+e- processes (spin effects without polarization, Boer, Jakob, Mulders)
single quark or antiquark are not polarized, butthere is a strong correlation between their spins
θπαθ
σθ
σ 222
sin4
3cosˆ
cosˆ
qesd
ddd
=−↑↑↑↓
),(),( cosˆ
cos 22/11/,2
21
221
21
21
⊥⊥⊥⊥
→
↑↑
−+
∑= pppp
zDzDdd
ddddzdzd
qhqhspinsq
spinsXhhee
θσ
θσ
cross section for detecting the final hadrons inside the jets
contains the product of two Collins functions
∑∑ ↑↑ ΔΔ
++=≡
q qhqhq
q qhN
qhN
q
zDzDe
zDzDe
ddzdzd
dddzdzd
A)()(
)()( )(cos
cos1sin
811
cos 21
cos
2/1/2
2/1/2
02
2
21
0211
21
21ϕθ
θ
θσ
π
θϕσ
∫ ⊥⊥ ↑↑ Δ=Δ etc. ),,( )(/
2/
pzDdzDqh
Nqh
N p 210 ϕϕϕ +≡
Cosine modulationsclearly visible
0210
0 cos)( ϕϕ PPN
N+=
21 ϕϕ +
0
0 )(N
N ϕ
M. Grosse Perdekamp, A. Ogawa, R. Seidl
Talk at SPIN2006
BELLE data
1P
),()cos(1 211 211
1 zzPAA
L
U
ϕϕ ++= U = unlike charged pionsL = like charged pions
⎥⎦
⎤++
ΔΔ+ΔΔ+ΔΔ−
⎢⎣
⎡+
ΔΔ+ΔΔ+
=
)()(2)()(5)()(5)()(2)()(5)()(5
)()(7)()(5)()(7)()(5
cos1sin
81),(
212121
212121
2121
21212
2
211
zDzDzDzDzDzDzDzDzDzDzDzD
zDzDzDzDzDzDzDzDzzP
UUFUUF
UN
UN
FN
UN
UN
FN
UUFF
UN
UN
FN
FN
θθ
etc. , , // UN
uN
FN
uN DDDD Δ≡ΔΔ≡Δ −+ ππ
M.A., M. Boglione, U.D’Alesio, A.Kotzinian, F. Murgia, A. Prokudin, C. Türk, in preparation
Collins functions and transversity distributions from a globalbest fit of HERMES, COMPASS and BELLE data
)]()([21)(N),( /2
/ 22
xqxfk
exkxq pq
kkTqT Δ+
⟩⟨=Δ
⊥
⟩⟨−
⊥
⊥⊥
πSoffer bound
)(2 )( )(N),( /2
/
/
22
zDp
ephzpzD qh
ppCqqh
N
⟩⟨=Δ
⊥
⟩⟨−
⊥⊥
⊥⊥
↑ πpositivity bound
1 |)(N| 1, || )()1()(N)(
≤≥+
−=+
xNxxNx Tq
Tq
Tq
Tq βα
βαβα
βαβα
1 |)(N| 1, || )()1()(N)(
≤≥+
−=+
zNzzNx Cq
Cq
Cq
Cq δγ
δγδγ
δγδγ
22 /2)( hMp
h
eMpeph ⊥−⊥
⊥ =
fit of HERMES data on)sin( Sh
UTA Φ+Φ
fit of COMPASS data on)sin( Sh
UTA Φ+Φ )sin( ShUTA Φ+Φ
fit of BELLE data on ),( 211 zzP
Extracted favoured and unfavoured Collins functions
positivity boundEfremov et al.Vogelsang, Yuan
Extracted transversity distributions
Soffer bound
Predictions for Collins asymmetryat COMPASS, proton target
Collins asymmetry for kaons, HERMES
Predictions for Collins asymmetryat JLab, proton target, 6 GeV
Predictions for Collins asymmetryat JLab, proton target, 12 GeV
Predictions for Collins asymmetryat JLab, neutron target, 6 GeV
Predictions for Collins asymmetryat JLab, neutron target, 12 GeV
Conclusions
Shaping up the nucleon spin and momentumtransverse structure
Information on quark intrinsic motion
Spin-k┴ correlation from Sivers function
Extracting Collins functions
Accessing transversity
Plenty of new data expected from JLab