Material Properties. Material Types Unbound (soil) Natural (i.e., subgrade) Select (i.e., subbase,...
-
Upload
sawyer-goulden -
Category
Documents
-
view
226 -
download
0
Transcript of Material Properties. Material Types Unbound (soil) Natural (i.e., subgrade) Select (i.e., subbase,...
Material Types Material Types
• Unbound (soil) Natural (i.e., subgrade) Select (i.e., subbase, base)
• Asphalt concrete
• Portland cement concrete
• Stabilized materials Cement stabilized Bituminous stabilized
• Bedrock
• Recycled
Material Properties Needed for DesignMaterial Properties Needed for Design
• Pavement response model material inputs Modulus (stiffness) Poisson’s ratio
• Materials-related pavement distress criteria Permanent deformation resistance Fatigue resistance Strength
• Other materials properties Density Permeability Thermal expansion coefficient
Material ModelsMaterial Models
• Linear elasticity Asphalt Stabilized layers Unbound layers
• Linear viscoelasticity Asphalt
• Nonlinear (all materials, to some extent) Nonlinear elasticity Plasticity Nonlinear viscoelasticity Viscoplasticity
Soil ClassificationSoil Classification
The separation of soil into classes or groups each having similar characteristics and potentially similar behaviour
Few simple (routine) tests are used to classify soils. Gradation Atterberg Limits
MIT ClassificationMIT ClassificationMaterial Size (mm)
Boulder > 60
Gravel
Fine 2 – 6
Medium 6 – 20
Coarse 20 – 60
Sand
Fine 0.06 – 0.2
Medium 0.2 – 0.6
Coarse 0.6 – 2
Silt
Fine 0.002 – 0.006
Medium 0.006 – 0.02
Coarse 0.02 – 0.06
Clay < 0.002
AASHTO ClassificationAASHTO Classification
• AASHTO: American Association of State Highways and Transportation Officials
• Used mainly for subgrade rating for highway purposes.
• Requires: Gradation LL PI
Group Index (GI)Group Index (GI)
• GI is used to classify the fine grained soils within one group and for judging their suitability as subgrade materials.
• GI = 0.2 a + 0.005 a.c + 0.01 b.d (0 to 20)
a = %P#200 – 35 (0 to 40)
b = %P#200 – 15 (0 to 40)
c = LL – 40 (0 to 20)
d = LL – 10 (0 to 20)
• GI to the nearest whole number (integer)
• High GI low quality material
• EX: A-7-6(5), A-7-6(18)
USCS ClassificationUSCS Classification
• USCS: United Soil Classification System
• Used mainly for geotechnical purposes
• Requires: Gradation LL PI
USCS ClassificationUSCS Classification
Soil Symbol Property Symbol
Gravel G Well Graded W
Sand S Poor Graded P
Clay C High LL (High Plasticity) H
Silt M Low LL (Low Plasticity) L
Peat Pt Clay C
Organic soil O silt M
EX: SC Clayey Sand EX: Dual Symbol: SP-SM GW Well Graded Gravel poorly graded sand CL Clay with low plasticity with silt
Computing CU and CCComputing CU and CC
Coefficient of Uniformity
Coefficient of Curvature
High Values Indicate Well-Graded Soil
Values Between 1-3 Indicate Well-Graded Soil
10
60
D
DCU
6010
230
DD
DCC
A-Line ChartA-Line Chart
Separates Clays and Silts
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
LIQUID LIMIT
PL
AS
TIC
ITY
IND
EX CH
CL
ML
MH
CL-ML
ML & OL
OH & MH
USCS Classification (Coarse-Grained)USCS Classification (Coarse-Grained)
Coarse- Grained
Soils
50% or less pass
#200
% P #4 < 50%
(Gravel)
Less than 5% Fines
Cu>4, Cc = (1-3) GW
Not satisfying GW GP
More than 12% Fines
Below A-Line GM
PI>7& Above A-Line
GC
% P #4 > 50%
(Sand)
Less than 5% Fines
Cu>6, Cc = (1-3) SW
Not satisfying GW SP
More than 12% Fines
Below A-Line SM
PI>7& Above A-Line
SC
USCS Classification (Fine-Grained)USCS Classification (Fine-Grained)
Fine- Grained
Soils
More than 50%
pass #200
LL<50%
ML
CL
OL
LL>50%
MH
CH
OH
Highly Organic Soils Pt
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0 20 40 60 80 100LIQUID LIMIT
PLAS
TICI
TY IN
DEX CH
CL
ML
MH
CL-ML
OH & MH
ML & OL
USCSDual SymbolsDual Symbols
For the following conditions a dual symbol should be used:a) Coarse grained soils with % fines between 5% and 12%
The first symbol is indicative of the gradation (W or P), the second symbol is indicative of the fines.
EX: SP-SM poorly graded sand with silt
b) Fine grained soils within the shaded zone in the A-line chart (PI between 4 and 7, LL between 12 and 25).
EX: CL-CM, Silty clay with Low LL
Comparison between the AASHTO and Comparison between the AASHTO and Unified SystemsUnified Systems
• Both systems are based on the texture and plasticity of the soil.
• Both systems divide the soils into two major categories: Coarse grained and Fine grained based on %P#200 SI sieve.
• AASHTO: %P#200 < 35% Coarse grained %P#200 > 35% Fine grained
• Unified: %P#200 < 50% Coarse grained %P#200 > 50% Fine grained
Comparison between the AASHTO and Comparison between the AASHTO and Unified Systems (Cont’d)Unified Systems (Cont’d)
• AASHTO: #10 sieve separates gravels and sand
• Unified: #4 sieve separates gravels and sand
• AASHTO : There is no organic soil
• Unified : There is organic soil
• AASHTO: gravely and sandy soils are not clearly separated
• Unified: gravely and sandy soils are clearly separated
FAA ClassificationFAA Classification
• FAA: Federal Aviation Administration
• Used mainly for soil classification for airport construction.
• Requires: Gradation LL PI
FAA Classification FAA Classification (Yoder & Witczak 1975)(Yoder & Witczak 1975)
Soil Group
% R#10 %P#10, R#60
%P#60, R#270
%P#270 LL PI
E-1 0-45 40+ 60- 15- 25- 6-
E-2 0-45 15+ 85- 25- 25- 6-
E-3 0-45 - - 25- 25- 6-
E-4 0-45 - - 35- 35- 10-
E-5 0-55 - - 45- 40- 15-
E-6 0-55 - - 45+ 40- 10-
E-7 0-55 - - 45+ 50- 10-30
E-8 0-55 - - 45+ 60- 15-40
E-9 0-55 - - 45+ 40+ 30-
E-10 0-55 - - 45+ 70- 20-50
E-11 0-55 - - 45+ 80- 30+
E-12 0-55 - - 45+ 80+ -
E-13 Muck and Peat – Field Examination
FAA Classification Chart for Fine-Grained FAA Classification Chart for Fine-Grained SoilsSoils
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0 10 20 30 40 50 10 60 70
E-12
E-9 E-10
E-8
E-7
E-6
Plasticity Indexli
qu
id L
imit
E-11
100
90
(Yoder & Witczak 1975)(Yoder & Witczak 1975)