Matching Kids with Books: From Lexiles to Leveling
description
Transcript of Matching Kids with Books: From Lexiles to Leveling
Matching Kids with Books: From Lexiles to LevelingMatching Kids with Books: From Lexiles to Leveling
Virginia State Reading AssociationMarch, 2008Heidi Anne Mesmer, Ph D.
MATCHING MATTERS MATCHING MATTERS
2
Without a good text-reader match, students:Without a good text-reader match, students:• will not learn to read.
• will not advance.
• will not be motivated to read.
• will have different chances at life.
3
4
Zone of Proximal Development
Independent Texts Texts that can be read without assistance. 100-96% word accuracy 76-100% comprehension
Frustrational Texts Texts that cannot be read with or without assistance. 0-89% word accuracy 0-74% comprehension
Instructional Texts Texts that can be read with assistance. 95-90% word accuracy 75% comprehension
Selecting texts to “move” the zone.
How do I make match?How do I make match?
5
TextReader
Purpose
Reader Factors • Reading Level • Attention• Memory• Motivation• Interests• Self-efficacy• First Language• Prior Knowledge• Print & Alphabetic
Purposes • Instruction
• Beginning reading• Fluency• Guided reading
• Self-selected, recreational
• At-home• Content area
• Science • Social Studies
6
Text Factors• Word Difficulty • Sentence Difficulty• Length of book • Ideas & Concepts • Topic• Genre • Organization • Font• Layout• Spacing
7
TOOLS TO ESTIMATE TEXT DIFFICULTY
TOOLS TO ESTIMATE TEXT DIFFICULTY
Traditional Readability Formulas
Second Generation Readability Formulas
Beginning Reading Scaffolds
8
Traditional Readability Formulas Traditional Readability Formulas • Deliver grades & increments
(2.3, 2.4)
• Based on two text factors• Semantic/word complexity
• Word lists (easy words) OR • Number of syllables
• Syntactic complexity• Sentence length
• Use at grade 2+9
10
New Dale-Chall Fry Graph Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level
Spache Primary Readability
First published 1948 1964 1943 1953 2002Last updated 1995 1977 1971 1974 2002Syntactic Complexity/Sentence
Average number of words per sentence
Average number of words per sentence
Average number of words per sentence
Average number of words per sentence
Average number of sentences per 100 word sample
Semantic Complexity/Words
Number of words not found on the New Dale-Chall List**
Number of syllables
Number of syllables
Number of words not on a list of 1041 words from the Harris-Jacobson Basic Elementary Vocabulary
Number of words not on the Primary Word List –810 frequently occurring first grade words taken from The Educator’s Word List
ValidationMethods
Comparisons to other formulas
Bormuth’s Passages (1971)
DARRTS, Gates/MacGinitie, NAEP passages
Comprehension Tests (unspecified)
Oral reading scores
Comparisons to other formulas
Comparisons to samples of basal readers***
Comparisons to other formulas
Gates-MacGinitie Test
Comparisons to samples of basal readers*
Comparisons to other formulas
Compared to the Fry and Spache using DRA passages (Beaver, 1997).
Increments used Whole grades 1– 4Two-grade ranges for 5-16(e.g. 5-6, 7-8)
Whole grades1- 17
Grade Level: Grades and tenths0-12(e.g. 1.2, 2.3)Reading Ease: 0-100 (0 hardest)
Whole grades and tenths .8 to 3.9
Whole grades
Advantages Recently revisedWell-validatedBest estimates at grade 3+
Not copyrightedEasy to use
Bundled with Microsoft word
Best estimates at grades 1 & 2.
Best estimates at grades 1 & 2Based on the latest word list (1995)
Disadvantages Weaker estimates at grade 1-2
Gray Area on graph does not deliver estimates of readability
May underestimate Not good for grades 1 and 2.
Not recently revisedUnderestimates at grade 3+.
Best used with beginning reading materials
Web site: Intervention Central Web site: Intervention Central
11www.interventioncentral.org
12
Title: Boy
Author: Roald Dahl
Total Words in Sample: 99 Total Sentences in Sample: 3Average Number of Words Per Sentence: 33.0Words Not Matched to Dale Familiar 3000-Word List: 10Percentage of Words Not Matched to Dale Word List: 10.10Dale-Chall Readability Index: 6.86 Raw Score; 7-8th Grade Level
My four friends and I had come across a loose
floorboard at the back of the classroom, and when we pried
it up with the blade of a pocketknife, we discovered a big
hollow space underneath. This, we decided, would be our
own secret hiding place for sweets and other small treasures such as conkers, and monkey-nuts, and birds
eggs. Every afternoon, when the last lesson was over, the
five of use would wait until the classroom had emptied, then we would lift up the floorboard and examine our secret hoard, perhaps adding to it or taking something away."
Oleander Solutions Software Oleander Solutions Software
13www.oleandersolutions.com
Second Generation Formulas: Lexiles Second Generation Formulas: Lexiles
• Advances the traditional formulas by harnessing technology and creating more precise units
• Breaks readability into Lexile units (L)• Books range from 200-1700L-• Based on two text factors
• Semantic/word complexity• Word Frequency
• Syntactic Complexity• Sentence Length15
Second Generation Formulas: Degrees of Reading Power
Second Generation Formulas: Degrees of Reading Power • Breaks readability into Degrees of
Reading Power (DRP)• Ranges from 0-65 DRP• Based on two text factors
• Semantic/word complexity• Words on Dale/Chall List• Number of letters per word
• Syntactic complexity• Number of words per sentence
16
17Same Units
2nd Generation Advantage: Parallel Text & Reader Measures
2nd Generation Advantage: Parallel Text & Reader Measures
Lexile-Leveled Assessments Lexile-Leveled Assessments • Gates-MacGinitie Reading Test• Iowa Test of Basic Skills• Metropolitan Achievement Test
(MAT-8)• Scholastic Reading Inventory (SRI)
and SRI Interactive (Computer-based)• Stanford Diagnostic Achievement
Test 9 & 10 (SAT-9/SAT-10)
18
Lexile & DRP Translation Lexile & DRP Translation
19
Grade Lexile Text Measures DRP
1 200 to 400 40-43
2 300 to 500 44-47
3 500 to 700 48-49
4 650 to 850 50-51
5 750 to 950 52-53
6 850 to 1050 54-55
7 950 to 1075 56-57
8 1000 to 1100 58-59
9 1050 to 1150 60-61
10 1100 to 1200 62-63
11- 12 1100 to 1300 63-65
Common Books in LexilesCommon Books in Lexiles
20
750 Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone
680 Charlotte’s Web
670 Number the Stars
650 How to Eat Fried
560 and Tall
560 Math Curse
560 Superfudge
490 Boxcar Children
400 Frog and Toad are Friends
330 Shoeshine Girl
260 The Cat in the Hat
220 Clifford the Big Red Dog
210 The Golly Sisters Go West
140 Amelia Bedelia
130 Nate the Great
130 Morris the Moose
3 Green Eggs and Ham BR Are you my Mother?
Caveats Caveats
• Estimate text difficulty
• Know the formula.
• Use with other subjective information.
• Use with connected text.
21
CaveatsCaveats
• Formulas can underestimate difficulty.
• Formulas can over- and underestimate difficulty of science and social text materials.
• Be alert for formula-conforming changes that increase difficult.
22
BEGINNING READERS BEGINNING READERS
Qualitatively Leveled Text
Decodable Text
Vocabularly-controlled/sight word readers
23
Formulas won’t work with beginning readersFormulas won’t work with beginning readers
• Texts are too short to get an adequate sample
• Formulas lose validity at the lower levels
• Formulas do not capture all that makes text difficult for beginners
• Beginners need:• Very common words• Format adjustments• Orthographic simplification
24
Qualitatively Leveled Texts Qualitatively Leveled Texts Houses by Joy
Cowley
“By the red house
there is. . . a blue
house. And by the
blue house
there is. . . a pink
house.. . And by the
pink house there is.
. .a yellow house.”
FEATURES• natural language• predictability• picture-to-text match• high content words• low word counts• limited print/page• Shorter sentences
Research indicates that levels do not include attention to word frequency or letter/sound complexity (Cunningham et al. 2005; Hatcher, 2 005)
Qualitatively Leveled Texts Qualitatively Leveled Texts
26
Highly Decodable TextHighly Decodable Text
The Lucky Duck(Modern Curriculum Press)
“One wet, wet day a
duck got stuck. A duck
got stuck in the mud. A
bug came and gave the
duck a tug. The duck
and the bug got stuck in
the mud.”
FEATURES
• words matching taught phonics
• words that are phonetically regular clustered and repeated
• single-syllable words(Brown, 2000, Hiebert, 1998,
Mesmer, 1999)
Decodable TextDecodable Text
28
Research indicates that students apply letter sound information more in decodable text but that one-on-one tutoring with a strong phonics component makes them no different than other materials (Jenkins et al. 2005; Mesmer, 2001;2005)
Vocabulary-controlled/Sight WordVocabulary-controlled/Sight Word
Fishing
On Saturday I
went fishing with
my grandma.
Grandma and
like to fish. We
fish every
Saturday. We
like to go to the
pond.
FEATURES• vocabulary
controlled by • the most
frequently occurring English words
• repetition
An illustrationAn illustration
30
• Words are introduced and repeated throughout the set of books.
• Repeated words are the most frequently occurring
• Ex:
Book 1 Book 2 Book 3the the thesee see see
look lookat at
can
• Use books in order.
Research indicates very few current materials possess this type of scaffold (Foorman et al, 2004)
Vocabulary-controlled/Sight Word Readers
Vocabulary-controlled/Sight Word Readers
31
MATCHING FOR BEGINNING READERS
MATCHING FOR BEGINNING READERS
32
By the end of first grade readers should be able to: By the end of first grade readers should be able to:
Read: • At about a 2nd grade
level• Have a reading
vocabulary of 300-500 words (Snow et al. 1998)
• High Frequency words
• Decodable words (50 sounds/minute)
Fluency:• Read 40 words correct
per minute (Hasbrouck & Tindale, 1997; Good & Kaminski, 2002)
Vocabulary: • Learn the meanings of
860 new root words (Anglin, 1993; Biemiller, 2005; Biemiller & Slonim, 1993)
Comprehension• Answer comprehension ?
s based on text• Predict and justify
answers• Discuss how, why, and
what-if ?s (Snow et al. 1998)
Phonemic Awareness:• Segment (35 sounds per
minute) (Good & Kaminski, 2002)
34
Concept of Word Concept of Word
35
Qualitatively Leveled Text Qualitatively Leveled Text
Major Reading strategies
• Memorizing• Using syntax and
semantics• Using sight words• Using some
letter/sound knowledge
Instructional Purposes
• At very early stages• Voice-to-print match• Concepts of word• when readers know
some letter/sound correspondences
Pre and partial alphabetic
Highly Decodable Text Highly Decodable Text
Major Reading Strategies
• Use letter/sound knowledge
• blending• word by word• rely on sight
words
Instructional Purposes
• scaffold letter/sound application
• to follow phonics instruction
Sight Word ReadersSight Word Readers
Major Reading
strategies• Relying on
sight vocabulary
• Relying on repetition
• Using pictures
Instructional Purposes
• to build sight vocabulary
• to build fluency
• at early stages
Teachers reportedly use some text types for specific purposes Teachers reportedly use some text types for specific purposes
0102030405060708090
100
PRINTCON
SOUNDOUT
SIGHT COMP FLUENCY STRUGGLING ELLs
Leveled books Children’s Literature Big books
Predictable books Decodable print Vocab-controlled
(Mesmer, 2006)
MATCHING FOR INTERMEDIATE READERS
MATCHING FOR INTERMEDIATE READERS
40
41
Class Text Organizer Class Text Organizer
• Obtain Instructional and Independent reading levels
• Organize the information to find texts for: • whole class (independent) • whole class (instruction)• novel groups• individual (reading workshop or
recreational)• classroom library
42
43
44
Making Matches for SSRMaking Matches for SSR
Student-driven choices require different considerations • Reading Level• Interests• Genre • Accountability• Metacognitive skills in
text choices
45
Reading level Reading level
• Label reading levels of books.
• Stock collections based on reading levels of all.
• Give students information about their reading levels.
• Teach students the metacognitive skill of judging difficulty
46
My Zone of Proximal Development is __________________________________.The best books for me are these colors_____________________________.My reading goal is __________________________________.* This card is laminated and filled in using dry erase markers so that changes can be made as students grow.
Books for ____________
5 or more?. . . the choice is poor
The difficulty meterThe difficulty meter
• Rate the difficulty of the book from the hardest 10 to the easiest 1
47
Interests- ASK Interests- ASK
Current study of 2-5th grade boys book preferences. . . • Animorphs, Bionicles, Pokemon, Star
Wars, Captain Underpants, and Bone.• Holes. • Topics
• baseball, basketball, football, BMX, snowboarding, animals, how things work, jokes, and game manuals.
• Newspapers (55% v. 27%) • Comics (64% vs. 40%)
48
What students like to read isn’t in school (Worthy, Moorman, & Turner, 1999)
Good SSR Practices (Kelly & Clausen-Grace, 2006)Good SSR Practices (Kelly & Clausen-Grace, 2006)
R5
• Read & Relax• Books ready• No getting up
• Reflect & Respond
• Rap
49
Best SSR PracticesBest SSR Practices
• Read & Relax• Books must be ready• No getting up (not a bathroom or water break,
no chats with teacher)• Teacher circulates & supports • “State of the class” taken at the beginning
• Reflect & Respond• Log: date, title, author, genre, and a brief
response OR• Post-it: Your favorite part and a part that
made you go hmmmm?
• Rap• Share reflections with the class OR• Conference w/teacher
50
Courtesy of K. DredgerCourtesy of K. Dredger
• Students put books in this box that “rock”!
• Attach a post-it telling why.
This Stinks!
• Students put books in this box that “stink!”
• Attach a post-it and tell why they didn’t like it.
• Rule: Have to have read the book
51
High Interest/Low Readability High Interest/Low Readability
High/Low Books
• Topics that interest students in the upper grades, but readabilities that match below grade level performance
• Apply formulas to help readers
• Can be good “whole class” texts
52
High Interest/Low Readability High Interest/Low Readability
• Wright Group-X-Zone
• Rigby-Gigglers
• MCP Comix
53
Accelerated Reading & Reading Counts Accelerated Reading & Reading Counts
54
ADVANTAGES + DISADVANTAGES --These programs may motivate apathetic readers who enjoy competition.
Extrinsic rewards based on point totals may lead children to believe that reading has little intrinsic value. Motivation may wane when rewards are removed.
The use of Reading Counts or AR can increase the time and attention that schools give to periods of sustained reading.
These packages are not comprehensive reading programs. They are supplemental and should not replace active teaching.
The quizzing component may help teachers judge whether or not a child has actually read a book.
These programs rely heavily on literal questions.
When overused, these programs can narrow the curriculum squeezing out rich responses to literature like creative interpretations, written responses, and literature circles. If a school does not have a great many AR or Reading Counts books, students may limit themselves to reading only program books.
Accelerated Reading & Reading Counts Accelerated Reading & Reading Counts DON’T• Use points to determine grades• Treat AR as a reading program• Let AR stop book discussions
because the discussions would allow students to “cheat” the quizzing
• www.trelease-on-reading.com
55
http://www.soe.vt.edu/elementaryed/mesmer/index.htmlhttp://www.soe.vt.edu/elementaryed/mesmer/index.html
Thank you!
56