Masterfile vs Heiss Communications: Complaint

8/3/2019 Masterfile vs Heiss Communications: Complaint

1/21

(MANx), CLOSED, DISCOVERY, MANADR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

(Western Division - Los Angeles)

CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:10-cv-07676-JHN -MAN

Masterfile Corporation v. Heiss Communications, Inc. et al

Assigned to: Judge Jacqueline H. Nguyen

Referred to: Magistrate Judge Margaret A. Nagle

Demand: $610,000

Cause: 17:101 Copyright Infringement

Date Filed: 10/14/2010

Date Terminated: 03/03/2011

Jury Demand: None

Nature of Suit: 820 Copyright

Jurisdiction: Federal Question

Plaintiff

Masterfile Corporation represented by Steven Marc Weinberg

Holmes Weinberg PC

30765 Pacific Coast Highway Suite 411

Malibu, CA 90265

310-457-6100

Fax: 310-457-9555

Email: [email protected]

ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

V.

Defendant

Heiss Communications, Inc.

Defendant

Sarah Yoon

Date Filed # Docket Text

10/14/2010 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants Heiss Communications, Inc., Sarah Yoon. Case

assigned to Judge Jacqueline H. Nguyen for all further proceedings. Discovery referred

to Magistrate Judge Margaret A. Nagle.(Filing fee $ 350 PAID.), filed by PlaintiffMasterfile Corporation. (et) (ds). (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/15/2010: # 1

Civil Cover Sheet) (ds). (Entered: 10/14/2010)

10/14/2010 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery) 1 as to Defendants Heiss

Communications, Inc., Sarah Yoon. (et) (Entered: 10/14/2010)

10/14/2010 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Masterfile

Corporation. (et) (ds). (Entered: 10/14/2010)

ECF - California Central District https://ecf.cacd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?4860856549334

1/12/2012


2/21

10/14/2010 3 NOTICE TO COUNSEL RE: Copyright, Patent and Trademark Reporting Requirements.

Counsel shall file the appropriate AO-120 and/or AO-121 form with the Clerk within 10

days. (Attachments: # 1 Form AO-121) (et) (Entered: 10/14/2010)

10/14/2010 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) (Entered: 10/14/2010)

02/16/2011 5 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re DISMISSAL FOR

LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Jacqueline H. Nguyen: The Court, on its own

motion, ORDERS that counsel for plaintiff show cause in writing on or before March 2,2011, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution.The Court will

consider the filing of the following, on or before the above date, as an appropriate

response to this Order to Show Cause: proof of service of summons and complaint.

(ama) (Entered: 02/16/2011)

03/03/2011 6 DISMISSAL BY COURT FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH RULE 4(M) OF THE

FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE by Judge Jacqueline H. Nguyen: re

Minutes of In Chambers Order to Show Cause, 5 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND

ADJUDGED that the above-entitled cause is dismissed without prejudice for failure to

comply with Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Made JS-6. Case

Terminated.) (ama) (Entered: 03/03/2011)

PACER Service Center

Transaction Receipt

01/11/2012 22:23:23

PACER

Login:im0564 Client Code:

Description:

Docket

Report

Search

Criteria:

2:10-cv-07676-JHN -MAN

End date: 1/11/2012

Billable

Pages:2 Cost: 0.16

ECF - California Central District https://ecf.cacd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?4860856549334

1/12/2012


3/21

Case 2:10-cv-07676-JHN -MAN Document 1 Filed 10/14/10 Page 1 of 19 Page ID #:6


4/21



5/21



6/21



7/21



8/21



9/21



10/21



11/21


12/21



13/21



14/21



15/21



16/21



17/21



18/21



19/21



20/21



21/21


Masterfile vs Heiss Communications: Complaint

Documents

Transcript of Masterfile vs Heiss Communications: Complaint