Master Checkpoint Report - Welcome To MLSmls-egypt.org/mls-ig/media-library/Checkpoints/EG025...6294...

CENTRE REPORT

Number of Students: 59 Centre Number: EG025 Date: May 2017

Number of Teaching Groups: 1 Centre: MISR LANGUAGE SCHOOL Subject: English

Performance in each sub-strandFor this part of the report, we have used the overall ability of each student and the difficulty of each question to predict how well each student should perform on each question. We have then compared their predicted performance with their actual performance. If there is a sub-strand where your group of students has performed better than expected, this may indicate that the teaching has been particularly effective in that sub-strand. If there is a sub-strand where your group of students has performed worse than expected, this may indicate that the coverage of the sub-strand was incomplete or that learning in this area has been less thorough than in other areas.

Wc Content Performance was as expectedWa Purpose and audience Performance was as expectedWt Text structure Performance was as expected

Writing

Us Spelling Performance was worse than expectedUv Vocabulary Performance was as expected

Un Sentence structure Performance was worse than expectedUp Punctuation Performance was as expectedUsage

Rx Explicit meaning Performance was better than expectedRi Implicit meaning Performance was as expectedRu Use of language Performance was as expected

Reading

Average Cambridge Secondary 1 Checkpoint scores are as follows:

Usage Average score = 2.8

Writing Average score = 2.8

English (overall) Average score = 3.0

Reading Average score = 3.3

Explanation of the Cambridge Secondary 1 Checkpoint Scale:

• Scores on the Cambridge Secondary 1 Checkpoint scale are from 0.0 (thelowest level of ability) to 6.0 (the highest level of ability).

• Students achieving between 3.0 and 4.0 have a sound understanding of mostof the curriculum content.

• Students achieving less than 2.0 have a basic understanding of the curriculumcontent. They would benefit from more focus on some areas of the curriculum.

• Students achieving more than 5.0 have an excellent understanding of thecurriculum content.

Note:

Any student who missed a paper has been omitted from the analysis on this page.

REPORT ON TEACHING GROUP 1 - Part 1 : Summary


Name of Teaching Group: E1 E1 Centre: MISR LANGUAGE SCHOOL Subject: English

Explanation of the Cambridge Secondary 1 Checkpoint Scale:

• Scores on the Cambridge Secondary 1 Checkpoint scale are from 0.0 (thelowest level of ability) to 6.0 (the highest level of ability)

• Students achieving between 3.0 and 4.0 have a sound understanding of mostof the curriculum content.

• Student achieving less than 2.0 have a basic understanding of the curriculumcontent. They would benefit from more focus on some areas of the curriculum.

• Student achieving more than 5.0 have an excellent understanding of thecurriculum content.

Note:


Average Cambridge Secondary 1 Checkpoint scores for this teaching group are as follows:

Usage Average score = 2.8

Writing Average score = 2.8

English (overall) Average score = 3.0

Reading Average score = 3.3

Wc Content Performance was as expectedWa Purpose and audience Performance was as expectedWt Text structure Performance was as expected

Writing

Us Spelling Performance was worse than expectedUv Vocabulary Performance was as expected

Un Sentence structure Performance was worse than expectedUp Punctuation Performance was as expectedUsage

Rx Explicit meaning Performance was better than expectedRi Implicit meaning Performance was as expectedRu Use of language Performance was as expected

Reading

For this part of the report, we have used the overall ability of each student and the difficulty of each question to predict how well each student should perform on each question. We have then compared their predicted performance with their actual performance. If there is a sub-strand where your group of students has performed better than expected, this may indicate that the teaching has been particularly effective in that sub-strand. If there is a sub-strand where your group of students has performed worse than expected, this may indicate that the coverage of the sub-strand was incomplete or that learning in this area has been less thorough than in other areas.

Performance in each sub-strand

6260 KAREEM AHMED SAMIR MOHAMED ABDELLATIF 2.3 2.8 1.7 2.3

6251 ABDELRAHMAN HESHAM OSMAN MOHAMED SHEHATA 2.3 2.8 2.2 2.1

6255 FARIDA WALEED MOHAMED ABDELWAHAB MOHSEN 2.3 2.5 2.2 2.3

6252 AHMED HANI ABDELAZIZ SHAABAN DESSOUKI 1.7 2.8 0.8 1.3

6253 AMROU AHMED SAFWAT AHMED ABDELMAWLA 3.6 4.0 3.3 3.7

6256 FARHA MOHAMED ADEL KHALAF MOHAMED ELSHIMY 4.3 3.2 4.5 5.6

6259 KARIM MOHAMED ANIS ELSHERIEF 2.3 3.0 1.7 2.1

6254 CHRISTOPHE MOURAD SAMIR 2.7 2.1 2.8 3.3

6257 FAROUK SHERIF FAROUK ABOUELEZZ 2.2 3.0 1.5 2.1

6258 ISMAIEL WALEED NAGATY 3.3 2.8 3.5 3.7

Class Average 3.0 3.3 2.8 2.8

Student No. Student Name English Reading Usage Writing

REPORT ON TEACHING GROUP 1 - Part 2 : List of Students' Results



Table of Students' Results


Results (Cambridge Secondary 1 Checkpoint scores)

6264 MALAK MOUSTAFA ELSABBAHI SABER 1.8 2.1 1.1 2.3

6265 MARIAM WAEL MOHAMED MOHAMED HASSAN 4.4 4.7 4.7 3.7

6261 KENZY HESHAM GEWAILY 1.5 1.9 0.8 1.8

6262 LINA BAHEEG MAHROUS BAHEEG 3.5 3.8 3.7 3.0

6263 MALAK MOHAMED KHALIFA SALEH KHALIFA 4.1 5.0 3.7 3.7

6266 MARIAM SHERIEF IBRAHIM 2.2 3.2 1.5 1.8

6269 NADER SAMER KAMAL SAMY ROFAIEL 2.3 3.2 1.5 2.1

6270 OMAR MAGDY SALAH ELDEEN 2.2 3.5 1.9 1.0

6267 MARWAN HAZEM WAFAAY MOSTAFA 3.7 3.5 3.5 4.4

6268 MOHAMED ABDALLA AHMED ABDELAAL 2.6 3.8 1.7 2.3









6271 OMAR MOHAMED REFAAT IBRAHIM ELGOHARY BESHIR 2.0 3.0 1.5 1.5

6276 YOUSEF WALEED SHAKER TAMIMI 1.7 2.3 1.3 1.3

6274 SHERIF MAHMOUD ABULAZM 2.2 1.0 2.6 3.3

6272 OMAR YASSER ABDELGHANY ELHOSARY 2.5 3.5 1.9 2.1

6273 SEIF KAMALELDIN SHEBL ELSAYED BADAWY 2.6 2.5 2.8 2.3

6279 AHMED ADEL ABU NOUR ALI DALY 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.1

6280 AHMED MOHAMED TALAAT 2.3 2.8 1.9 2.3

6278 ZEIN GAMAL SAMIR ALLAM 1.7 2.5 1.5 0.8

6275 SHERIF MOHAMED ABDELFATTAH ABOHENDIA 2.3 2.5 2.2 2.3

6277 YOUSSEF TAREK NASRELDIN 2.4 2.5 2.8 1.8









6281 AMR MOHAMED REDA ESMAEEL HAMED MOHAMED 1.3 1.9 1.1 1.0

6286 HANA MOHAMED MAGED HOSNY AHMED 2.1 2.1 1.9 2.3

6284 HAIDY AMR AHMED MOHI EL-DIN AWAD 4.4 4.7 4.5 4.1

6282 ENGY SHERIF MOHAMED ABDOU ELOKBY 2.7 3.5 2.6 1.8

6283 FARIDA SHERIF AHMED HASSAN YOUSSEF 6.0 5.4 6.0 6.0

6289 IBRAHIM YEHIA KAMAL ALI ALI EL EZABY 3.3 3.0 3.7 3.0

6290 KARMA KHALED HAMZA BARAKAT 4.0 3.8 3.5 5.2

6288 HIND NASR KAYED 5.0 5.4 5.0 4.8

6285 HANA ELHOSSENY MOUHAMED IBRAHEM 2.8 3.5 2.6 2.1

6287 HASSAN HANI MOHAMED FAROUK 2.2 2.1 2.2 2.3









6300 NOUR AHMED ASSEM ELETR 3.4 3.5 3.3 3.3

6294 MALAK HESHAM MOHAMED AHMED ZAHRAN 2.8 3.0 2.8 2.3

6295 MALAK YASSER SAAD AHMED SALLAM 3.1 3.2 2.8 3.3

6293 MALAK KHALED HAMDY MOHAMED MOSTAFA HAMOUDA 5.3 4.0 5.5 6.0

6291 LAILA MOHAMED SAADALLA MOHAMED HANTIRAH 4.4 4.0 4.0 5.6

6292 LINA SHERIF TOURKY 2.9 4.0 1.9 3.0

6298 MOHAMED THARWAT IBRAHIM ABDELLATIF 3.3 3.5 3.5 2.7

6299 NADINE SHREEF GAMAL NOUB 4.9 3.0 6.0 5.2

6296 MARIAM HOSSAM IBRAHIM ABDELKADER 2.9 3.8 2.4 2.7

6297 MARIAM MOHAMED ABDALGHANY MOHAMED KHALIFA 2.5 4.0 1.9 1.5









6307 YOUSSRA YASSER MOHAMED NASR MOHAMED OMAR 2.7 3.2 2.6 2.1

6303 OMAR KHALED ABDELHAFEEZ KOTB ZAFAN 4.3 3.8 4.7 4.4

6306 YOUSSEF EHAB AHMED ELBADAWY SALEM 3.8 4.7 3.7 3.0

6305 STEVEN WAGIH TALAAT RAMSIS 2.8 3.8 2.4 2.1

6302 NOURELDIN TAREK NASRELDIN 3.5 2.8 4.0 3.7

6309 AHMED ABD EL NASSER BADAWI 3.5 4.3 3.1 3.3

6304 REEM AHMED ELHOSSANY ZAHER 4.0 5.0 3.5 3.7

6301 NOUR MOHAMED MAGED HOSNY AHMED 1.7 2.3 1.1 1.5

6308 ZEINAB MOSTAFA MOHAMED MOSTAFA KHATTAB 3.6 3.8 4.0 3.0









123243002010220002322324001200001116257 24 22 46 2.2

333456002111220003455533001211101116256 37 33 70 4.3

223444000111220002344433101211101116258 33 26 59 3.3

123244003101220002222323100210100016260 22 25 47 2.3

233244002120100012222224100100101116259 22 25 47 2.3

223333002100220002433333000100101016255 25 23 48 2.3

223322002000022112334423000200101016251 26 22 48 2.3

222121003100200112223324000010100016252 21 18 39 1.7

223344000101220003433433001200100016254 28 24 52 2.7

223344002111222003434434001201111116253 34 29 63 3.6

222233001001020002222324000100000016261 19 18 37 1.5

324444002112222113334434101210101116263 33 35 68 4.1

223433003111220113444433101201010116262 33 29 62 3.5

223244000000202002212233000110001116264 20 21 41 1.8

325444103112220113444433101211101116265 35 36 71 4.4

REPORT ON TEACHING GROUP 1 - Part 3 : Marks scored on each question

Table of marks scored by each Student on each question




44555722312222211457774411121111111

svpntcuuuiiiiiiiispntacxnnnpvvvvxxx

UUUUWWRRRRRRRRRRRUUUWWWRUUUUUUUURRR

ii

iviivii

vviiiibababaviiiibadcbacba

99999988766543211888887765432222111

22222222222222222111111111111111111

Max

Strand

part

and

Q No

Paper

Students

50 50 100

P1 P2 Test Chkpt

222222003102200002333323000110001116271 24 20 44 2.0

223222003112120002222224001101111016270 23 23 46 2.2

334334003000220002233323000210100116273 24 27 51 2.6

323223002101222002333334000110001016272 25 25 50 2.5

223233002002220002132334001200001116269 24 23 47 2.3

222123002101222003333323000100101016266 24 22 46 2.2

223344003111220002332324000100001116268 23 28 51 2.6

333233002101222003446543110110101116267 37 27 64 3.7

334443000001000002234432100100000116274 24 22 46 2.2

333333003100020003313334000100001116280 24 24 48 2.3

111111000000000001112204000000001016279 13 6 19 0.0

222222002100200012313313000210000116276 21 18 39 1.7

323245003002200002422223000110101016275 22 26 48 2.3

223222002010220002412214000200000016278 19 20 39 1.7

322333003002200003332323001210101016277 26 23 49 2.4






44555722312222211457774411121111111



ii

iviivii


99999988766543211888887765432222111

22222222222222222111111111111111111

Max

Strand

part

and

Q No

Paper

Students

50 50 100

P1 P2 Test Chkpt

223333001121220002433333001210101016294 28 25 53 2.8

333334112112222003455534011211101016284 38 33 71 4.4

333334013111202002412234010110100016285 23 30 53 2.8

333334002101220002214311000210000016286 18 27 45 2.1

443556003122222114566634110211001016283 42 43 85 6.0

223223001111222003345533000211101016295 33 24 57 3.1

232223000001220112212210000200001016281 14 21 35 1.3

333233002122220003413313001210001016282 24 28 52 2.7

223344003102220113456643111201101116291 41 30 71 4.4

223333003111222002434434000100001016292 27 28 55 2.9

224344002122220004577744111210111116293 49 30 79 5.3

334344002111220114436634000110100116290 35 32 67 4.0

223223002100200002434422100200001116287 27 19 46 2.2

334345003122222114455534111210011016288 39 38 77 5.0

223333003011220004444433000211111016289 34 25 59 3.3






44555722312222211457774411121111111



ii

iviivii


99999988766543211888887765432222111

22222222222222222111111111111111111

Max

Strand

part

and

Q No

Paper

Students

50 50 100

P1 P2 Test Chkpt

333444002122222113334434001111101016304 31 36 67 4.0

334334103111220013456624111210100016303 38 32 70 4.3

223323003112220113345533110101101116309 34 28 62 3.5

223222002101222002433434000211001116305 30 23 53 2.8

333434013011221003344424001211101016308 32 31 63 3.6

333333003112110002333323100100011116307 25 27 52 2.7

324333003112222002444434001210111116306 34 31 65 3.8

222223001102222111332323101200101116297 25 25 50 2.5

222223003100022113344434000210101116296 32 23 55 2.9

333333002102210003345533001211111016302 35 26 61 3.5

332333003002220003434334111200101116298 33 26 59 3.3

222222001101220003224313000100000016301 20 19 39 1.7

333333003101022003344444000111101116300 33 27 60 3.4

445556003120022003566601101211101116299 37 39 76 4.9






44555722312222211457774411121111111



ii

iviivii


99999988766543211888887765432222111

22222222222222222111111111111111111

Max

Strand

part

and

Q No

Paper

Students

50 50 100

P1 P2 Test Chkpt

STATEMENT OF ACHIEVEMENT

Student Number: 6251 Centre Name: MISR LANGUAGE SCHOOL Centre Number: EG025

ABDELRAHMAN HESHAM OSMAN MOHAMED SHEHATA

Cambridge Secondary 1 Checkpoint Score: 2.3

Date: May 2017

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 2.2

Writing 2.1

Reading 2.8

Strand results

Explanatory Notes

The results are given using the Cambridge Secondary 1 Checkpoint scale. Scores on the Cambridge Secondary 1 Checkpoint scale are from 0.0 (the lowest level of achievement) to 6.0 (the highest level ofachievement).

This document is a Statement of Achievement in a Cambridge Secondary 1 Checkpoint test. Examination certificates are not issued for Cambridge Secondary 1 Checkpoint tests.

Student Number: 6251 Centre Number: EG025 Date: May 2017

Student Name: ABDELRAHMAN HESHAM OSMAN MOHAMED SHEHATA

Centre: MISR LANGUAGE SCHOOL Subject: English

To be given to the student with the Statement of Achievement

REPORT TO STUDENT

Your Cambridge Secondary 1 Checkpoint results are as follows:

Usage score = 2.2

Writing score = 2.1

English (Overall) score = 2.3

Reading score = 2.8

This is what the scores mean:

Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

What you got right and what you got wrong

Most of your answers were as expected for a student with your Cambridge Secondary 1 Checkpoint score. However, some of your answers were surprising: the most surprising ones are listed below. They may give you information about what parts of the subject you are good at and what parts you need to work harder at.

Questions you answered well that we expected you to find difficult

1a Reading Implicit meaning 2

2b Usage Vocabulary 1

1b Reading Implicit meaning 2

2 Reading Implicit meaning 2

Question and part Strand Sub-strand Paper

Questions you did not answer well that we expected you to find easy


9i Writing Content 2






AHMED HANI ABDELAZIZ SHAABAN DESSOUKI


Date: May 2017

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 0.8

Writing 1.3

Reading 2.8

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: AHMED HANI ABDELAZIZ SHAABAN DESSOUKI



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 0.8

Writing score = 1.3


Reading score = 2.8


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -




2d Usage Vocabulary 1

7a Reading Explicit meaning 1





9iii Usage Sentence structure 2


3 Usage Punctuation 1





AMROU AHMED SAFWAT AHMED ABDELMAWLA


Date: May 2017

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 3.3

Writing 3.7

Reading 4.0

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: AMROU AHMED SAFWAT AHMED ABDELMAWLA



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 3.3

Writing score = 3.7


Reading score = 4.0


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -




4 Usage Sentence structure 1


2c Usage Vocabulary 1

2a Usage Vocabulary 1



9vi Usage Spelling 2

9v Usage Vocabulary 2






CHRISTOPHE MOURAD SAMIR


Date: May 2017

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 2.8

Writing 3.3

Reading 2.1

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: CHRISTOPHE MOURAD SAMIR Centre: MISR LANGUAGE SCHOOL Subject: English


REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 2.8

Writing score = 3.3


Reading score = 2.1


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -




9ii Writing Text structure 2

8iv Usage Punctuation 1





7 Reading Use of language 2

1c Reading Explicit meaning 1






FARIDA WALEED MOHAMED ABDELWAHAB MOHSEN


Date: May 2017

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 2.2

Writing 2.3

Reading 2.5

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: FARIDA WALEED MOHAMED ABDELWAHAB MOHSEN



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 2.2

Writing score = 2.3


Reading score = 2.5


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -





7b Writing Content 1












FARHA MOHAMED ADEL KHALAF MOHAMED ELSHIMY


Date: May 2017

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 4.5

Writing 5.6

Reading 3.2

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: FARHA MOHAMED ADEL KHALAF MOHAMED ELSHIMY



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 4.5

Writing score = 5.6


Reading score = 3.2


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















FAROUK SHERIF FAROUK ABOUELEZZ


Date: May 2017

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 1.5

Writing 2.1

Reading 3.0

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: FAROUK SHERIF FAROUK ABOUELEZZ



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 1.5

Writing score = 2.1


Reading score = 3.0


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -






1b Reading Explicit meaning 1











ISMAIEL WALEED NAGATY


Date: May 2017

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 3.5

Writing 3.7

Reading 2.8

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: ISMAIEL WALEED NAGATY Centre: MISR LANGUAGE SCHOOL Subject: English


REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 3.5

Writing score = 3.7


Reading score = 2.8


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -













8v Usage Spelling 1




KARIM MOHAMED ANIS ELSHERIEF


Date: May 2017

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 1.7

Writing 2.1

Reading 3.0

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: KARIM MOHAMED ANIS ELSHERIEF Centre: MISR LANGUAGE SCHOOL Subject: English


REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 1.7

Writing score = 2.1


Reading score = 3.0


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -











8i Writing Purpose and audience 1






KAREEM AHMED SAMIR MOHAMED ABDELLATIF


Date: May 2017

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 1.7

Writing 2.3

Reading 2.8

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: KAREEM AHMED SAMIR MOHAMED ABDELLATIF



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 1.7

Writing score = 2.3


Reading score = 2.8


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















KENZY HESHAM GEWAILY


Date: May 2017

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 0.8

Writing 1.8

Reading 1.9

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: KENZY HESHAM GEWAILY Centre: MISR LANGUAGE SCHOOL Subject: English


REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 0.8

Writing score = 1.8


Reading score = 1.9


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















LINA BAHEEG MAHROUS BAHEEG


Date: May 2017

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 3.7

Writing 3.0

Reading 3.8

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: LINA BAHEEG MAHROUS BAHEEG Centre: MISR LANGUAGE SCHOOL Subject: English


REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 3.7

Writing score = 3.0


Reading score = 3.8


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















MALAK MOHAMED KHALIFA SALEH KHALIFA


Date: May 2017

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 3.7

Writing 3.7

Reading 5.0

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: MALAK MOHAMED KHALIFA SALEH KHALIFA



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 3.7

Writing score = 3.7


Reading score = 5.0


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















MALAK MOUSTAFA ELSABBAHI SABER


Date: May 2017

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 1.1

Writing 2.3

Reading 2.1

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: MALAK MOUSTAFA ELSABBAHI SABER



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 1.1

Writing score = 2.3


Reading score = 2.1


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















MARIAM WAEL MOHAMED MOHAMED HASSAN


Date: May 2017

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 4.7

Writing 3.7

Reading 4.7

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: MARIAM WAEL MOHAMED MOHAMED HASSAN



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 4.7

Writing score = 3.7


Reading score = 4.7


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -






8b Reading Use of language 2











MARIAM SHERIEF IBRAHIM


Date: May 2017

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 1.5

Writing 1.8

Reading 3.2

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: MARIAM SHERIEF IBRAHIM Centre: MISR LANGUAGE SCHOOL Subject: English


REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 1.5

Writing score = 1.8


Reading score = 3.2


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















MARWAN HAZEM WAFAAY MOSTAFA


Date: May 2017

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 3.5

Writing 4.4

Reading 3.5

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: MARWAN HAZEM WAFAAY MOSTAFA



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 3.5

Writing score = 4.4


Reading score = 3.5


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















MOHAMED ABDALLA AHMED ABDELAAL


Date: May 2017

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 1.7

Writing 2.3

Reading 3.8

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: MOHAMED ABDALLA AHMED ABDELAAL



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 1.7

Writing score = 2.3


Reading score = 3.8


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -













8v Usage Spelling 1




NADER SAMER KAMAL SAMY ROFAIEL


Date: May 2017

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 1.5

Writing 2.1

Reading 3.2

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: NADER SAMER KAMAL SAMY ROFAIEL



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 1.5

Writing score = 2.1


Reading score = 3.2


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















OMAR MAGDY SALAH ELDEEN


Date: May 2017

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 1.9

Writing 1.0

Reading 3.5

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: OMAR MAGDY SALAH ELDEEN Centre: MISR LANGUAGE SCHOOL Subject: English


REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 1.9

Writing score = 1.0


Reading score = 3.5


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















OMAR MOHAMED REFAAT IBRAHIM ELGOHARY BESHIR


Date: May 2017

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 1.5

Writing 1.5

Reading 3.0

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: OMAR MOHAMED REFAAT IBRAHIM ELGOHARY BESHIR



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 1.5

Writing score = 1.5


Reading score = 3.0


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















OMAR YASSER ABDELGHANY ELHOSARY


Date: May 2017

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 1.9

Writing 2.1

Reading 3.5

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: OMAR YASSER ABDELGHANY ELHOSARY



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 1.9

Writing score = 2.1


Reading score = 3.5


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















SEIF KAMALELDIN SHEBL ELSAYED BADAWY


Date: May 2017

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 2.8

Writing 2.3

Reading 2.5

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: SEIF KAMALELDIN SHEBL ELSAYED BADAWY



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 2.8

Writing score = 2.3


Reading score = 2.5


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















SHERIF MAHMOUD ABULAZM


Date: May 2017

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 2.6

Writing 3.3

Reading 1.0

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: SHERIF MAHMOUD ABULAZM Centre: MISR LANGUAGE SCHOOL Subject: English


REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 2.6

Writing score = 3.3


Reading score = 1.0


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















SHERIF MOHAMED ABDELFATTAH ABOHENDIA


Date: May 2017

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 2.2

Writing 2.3

Reading 2.5

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: SHERIF MOHAMED ABDELFATTAH ABOHENDIA



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 2.2

Writing score = 2.3


Reading score = 2.5


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















YOUSEF WALEED SHAKER TAMIMI


Date: May 2017

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 1.3

Writing 1.3

Reading 2.3

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: YOUSEF WALEED SHAKER TAMIMI Centre: MISR LANGUAGE SCHOOL Subject: English


REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 1.3

Writing score = 1.3


Reading score = 2.3


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















YOUSSEF TAREK NASRELDIN


Date: May 2017

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 2.8

Writing 1.8

Reading 2.5

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: YOUSSEF TAREK NASRELDIN Centre: MISR LANGUAGE SCHOOL Subject: English


REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 2.8

Writing score = 1.8


Reading score = 2.5


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















ZEIN GAMAL SAMIR ALLAM


Date: May 2017

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 1.5

Writing 0.8

Reading 2.5

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: ZEIN GAMAL SAMIR ALLAM Centre: MISR LANGUAGE SCHOOL Subject: English


REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 1.5

Writing score = 0.8


Reading score = 2.5


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















AHMED ADEL ABU NOUR ALI DALY


Date: May 2017

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 0.0

Writing 0.1

Reading 1.3

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: AHMED ADEL ABU NOUR ALI DALY



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 0.0

Writing score = 0.1


Reading score = 1.3


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















AHMED MOHAMED TALAAT


Date: May 2017

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 1.9

Writing 2.3

Reading 2.8

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: AHMED MOHAMED TALAAT Centre: MISR LANGUAGE SCHOOL Subject: English


REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 1.9

Writing score = 2.3


Reading score = 2.8


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















AMR MOHAMED REDA ESMAEEL HAMED MOHAMED


Date: May 2017

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 1.1

Writing 1.0

Reading 1.9

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: AMR MOHAMED REDA ESMAEEL HAMED MOHAMED



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 1.1

Writing score = 1.0


Reading score = 1.9


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















ENGY SHERIF MOHAMED ABDOU ELOKBY


Date: May 2017

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 2.6

Writing 1.8

Reading 3.5

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: ENGY SHERIF MOHAMED ABDOU ELOKBY



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 2.6

Writing score = 1.8


Reading score = 3.5


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















FARIDA SHERIF AHMED HASSAN YOUSSEF


Date: May 2017

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 6.0

Writing 6.0

Reading 5.4

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: FARIDA SHERIF AHMED HASSAN YOUSSEF



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 6.0

Writing score = 6.0


Reading score = 5.4


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















HAIDY AMR AHMED MOHI EL-DIN AWAD


Date: May 2017

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 4.5

Writing 4.1

Reading 4.7

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: HAIDY AMR AHMED MOHI EL-DIN AWAD



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 4.5

Writing score = 4.1


Reading score = 4.7


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -






8a Reading Use of language 2











HANA ELHOSSENY MOUHAMED IBRAHEM


Date: May 2017

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 2.6

Writing 2.1

Reading 3.5

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: HANA ELHOSSENY MOUHAMED IBRAHEM



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 2.6

Writing score = 2.1


Reading score = 3.5


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















HANA MOHAMED MAGED HOSNY AHMED


Date: May 2017

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 1.9

Writing 2.3

Reading 2.1

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: HANA MOHAMED MAGED HOSNY AHMED



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 1.9

Writing score = 2.3


Reading score = 2.1


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















HASSAN HANI MOHAMED FAROUK


Date: May 2017

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 2.2

Writing 2.3

Reading 2.1

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: HASSAN HANI MOHAMED FAROUK Centre: MISR LANGUAGE SCHOOL Subject: English


REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 2.2

Writing score = 2.3


Reading score = 2.1


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















HIND NASR KAYED


Date: May 2017

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 5.0

Writing 4.8

Reading 5.4

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: HIND NASR KAYED Centre: MISR LANGUAGE SCHOOL Subject: English


REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 5.0

Writing score = 4.8


Reading score = 5.4


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -






8v Usage Spelling 1











IBRAHIM YEHIA KAMAL ALI ALI EL EZABY


Date: May 2017

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 3.7

Writing 3.0

Reading 3.0

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: IBRAHIM YEHIA KAMAL ALI ALI EL EZABY



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 3.7

Writing score = 3.0


Reading score = 3.0


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -






8v Usage Spelling 1











KARMA KHALED HAMZA BARAKAT


Date: May 2017

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 3.5

Writing 5.2

Reading 3.8

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: KARMA KHALED HAMZA BARAKAT Centre: MISR LANGUAGE SCHOOL Subject: English


REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 3.5

Writing score = 5.2


Reading score = 3.8


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -





8v Usage Spelling 1












LAILA MOHAMED SAADALLA MOHAMED HANTIRAH


Date: May 2017

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 4.0

Writing 5.6

Reading 4.0

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: LAILA MOHAMED SAADALLA MOHAMED HANTIRAH



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 4.0

Writing score = 5.6


Reading score = 4.0


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















LINA SHERIF TOURKY


Date: May 2017

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 1.9

Writing 3.0

Reading 4.0

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: LINA SHERIF TOURKY Centre: MISR LANGUAGE SCHOOL Subject: English


REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 1.9

Writing score = 3.0


Reading score = 4.0


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -












8v Usage Spelling 1





MALAK KHALED HAMDY MOHAMED MOSTAFA HAMOUDA


Date: May 2017

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 5.5

Writing 6.0

Reading 4.0

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: MALAK KHALED HAMDY MOHAMED MOSTAFA HAMOUDA



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 5.5

Writing score = 6.0


Reading score = 4.0


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















MALAK HESHAM MOHAMED AHMED ZAHRAN


Date: May 2017

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 2.8

Writing 2.3

Reading 3.0

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: MALAK HESHAM MOHAMED AHMED ZAHRAN



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 2.8

Writing score = 2.3


Reading score = 3.0


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -













8v Usage Spelling 1




MALAK YASSER SAAD AHMED SALLAM


Date: May 2017

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 2.8

Writing 3.3

Reading 3.2

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: MALAK YASSER SAAD AHMED SALLAM



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 2.8

Writing score = 3.3


Reading score = 3.2


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















MARIAM HOSSAM IBRAHIM ABDELKADER


Date: May 2017

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 2.4

Writing 2.7

Reading 3.8

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: MARIAM HOSSAM IBRAHIM ABDELKADER



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 2.4

Writing score = 2.7


Reading score = 3.8


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















MARIAM MOHAMED ABDALGHANY MOHAMED KHALIFA


Date: May 2017

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 1.9

Writing 1.5

Reading 4.0

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: MARIAM MOHAMED ABDALGHANY MOHAMED KHALIFA



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 1.9

Writing score = 1.5


Reading score = 4.0


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -










8v Usage Spelling 1







MOHAMED THARWAT IBRAHIM ABDELLATIF


Date: May 2017

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 3.5

Writing 2.7

Reading 3.5

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: MOHAMED THARWAT IBRAHIM ABDELLATIF



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 3.5

Writing score = 2.7


Reading score = 3.5


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















NADINE SHREEF GAMAL NOUB


Date: May 2017

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 6.0

Writing 5.2

Reading 3.0

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: NADINE SHREEF GAMAL NOUB Centre: MISR LANGUAGE SCHOOL Subject: English


REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 6.0

Writing score = 5.2


Reading score = 3.0


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















NOUR AHMED ASSEM ELETR


Date: May 2017

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 3.3

Writing 3.3

Reading 3.5

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: NOUR AHMED ASSEM ELETR Centre: MISR LANGUAGE SCHOOL Subject: English


REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 3.3

Writing score = 3.3


Reading score = 3.5


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















NOUR MOHAMED MAGED HOSNY AHMED


Date: May 2017

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 1.1

Writing 1.5

Reading 2.3

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: NOUR MOHAMED MAGED HOSNY AHMED



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 1.1

Writing score = 1.5


Reading score = 2.3


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















NOURELDIN TAREK NASRELDIN


Date: May 2017

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 4.0

Writing 3.7

Reading 2.8

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: NOURELDIN TAREK NASRELDIN Centre: MISR LANGUAGE SCHOOL Subject: English


REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 4.0

Writing score = 3.7


Reading score = 2.8


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















OMAR KHALED ABDELHAFEEZ KOTB ZAFAN


Date: May 2017

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 4.7

Writing 4.4

Reading 3.8

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: OMAR KHALED ABDELHAFEEZ KOTB ZAFAN



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 4.7

Writing score = 4.4


Reading score = 3.8


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















REEM AHMED ELHOSSANY ZAHER


Date: May 2017

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 3.5

Writing 3.7

Reading 5.0

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: REEM AHMED ELHOSSANY ZAHER Centre: MISR LANGUAGE SCHOOL Subject: English


REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 3.5

Writing score = 3.7


Reading score = 5.0


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















STEVEN WAGIH TALAAT RAMSIS


Date: May 2017

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 2.4

Writing 2.1

Reading 3.8

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: STEVEN WAGIH TALAAT RAMSIS Centre: MISR LANGUAGE SCHOOL Subject: English


REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 2.4

Writing score = 2.1


Reading score = 3.8


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















YOUSSEF EHAB AHMED ELBADAWY SALEM


Date: May 2017

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 3.7

Writing 3.0

Reading 4.7

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: YOUSSEF EHAB AHMED ELBADAWY SALEM



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 3.7

Writing score = 3.0


Reading score = 4.7


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -











8v Usage Spelling 1






YOUSSRA YASSER MOHAMED NASR MOHAMED OMAR


Date: May 2017

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 2.6

Writing 2.1

Reading 3.2

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: YOUSSRA YASSER MOHAMED NASR MOHAMED OMAR



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 2.6

Writing score = 2.1


Reading score = 3.2


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -










8v Usage Spelling 1







ZEINAB MOSTAFA MOHAMED MOSTAFA KHATTAB


Date: May 2017

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 4.0

Writing 3.0

Reading 3.8

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: ZEINAB MOSTAFA MOHAMED MOSTAFA KHATTAB



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 4.0

Writing score = 3.0


Reading score = 3.8


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















AHMED ABD EL NASSER BADAWI


Date: May 2017

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 3.1

Writing 3.3

Reading 4.3

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: AHMED ABD EL NASSER BADAWI Centre: MISR LANGUAGE SCHOOL Subject: English


REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 3.1

Writing score = 3.3


Reading score = 4.3


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -















Master Checkpoint Report - Welcome To MLSmls-egypt.org/mls-ig/media-library/Checkpoints/EG025...6294...

Documents

Transcript of Master Checkpoint Report - Welcome To MLSmls-egypt.org/mls-ig/media-library/Checkpoints/EG025...6294...