Masonry Out-of- Plane Walls Ultimate Limit States: Flexure and Shear · 2018. 5. 3. · Flexure and...
Transcript of Masonry Out-of- Plane Walls Ultimate Limit States: Flexure and Shear · 2018. 5. 3. · Flexure and...
-
Engineered Masonry Design Course Friday April 27, 2018
© 2018 Canada Masonry Design Centre 1
Masonry Out-of-Plane Walls Ultimate Limit States: Flexure and Shear12:30 PM – 2:00 PMBennett Banting
Lecture Outline1. Overview (10)2. Flexure and Axial Load Resistance
a) Fully-Grouted Wall Close-Spaced Reinforcement (35)b) Fully-Grouted Wall Wide-Spaced Reinforcement (15)c) Partially-Grouted Wall Wide-Spaced Reinforcement (15)d) Eccentric Reinforcement (5)
3. Shear Resistancea) Fully- and Partially-Grouted Shear Walls (10)
-
Engineered Masonry Design Course Friday April 27, 2018
© 2018 Canada Masonry Design Centre 2
Flexure
• One-way Bending• Weak axis bending of masonry walls
• Wind• Earthquake• Lateral Earth
• Unit Wall Design• Design for a “per meter” equivalent wall• Effective Compression Zone Width
Axial Load
• Loadbearing vs. Non-loadbearing• Concentric vs. Eccentric vs. Virtual
Eccentric• Euler Buckling• Second Order Slenderness Effects
-
Engineered Masonry Design Course Friday April 27, 2018
© 2018 Canada Masonry Design Centre 3
Flexure and Axial Load Interaction• Interaction Diagrams Useful• Complex Relationship• General Solution Strategy
• Solve Force Equilibrium for Pf = Pr• Solve Mr
• Equivalent Compression Block• In face shell versus in grouted cell
Slenderness Effects• Slenderness Ignored• Slenderness Considered• Special Provisions for Slenderness
• Wall Loads versus Wall Resistance• Wall Resistance Focus Here
-
Engineered Masonry Design Course Friday April 27, 2018
© 2018 Canada Masonry Design Centre 4
Outside Scope
Two-way BendingTwo-way Bending
Walls with OpeningsWalls with Openings
Blast LoadingBlast Loading
Wall Resistance
-
Engineered Masonry Design Course Friday April 27, 2018
© 2018 Canada Masonry Design Centre 5
Flexure & Axial Load Resistance:
-Fully-Grouted -Out-of-Plane Walls-Closely-Spaced Reinforcement
(Pages 376-380)Cl. 10 CSA S304
Masonry Out-of-Plane Loads
• Factored Axial Load• Applied Wind Load on Face
• Determine Moment Resistance• 6.0 m Long• 25 cm Units, tf = 38.6 mm• 30 MPa Block, Type S Mortar, Fully-Grouted• 15M Vertical Reinforcement @ 0.2 m
-
Engineered Masonry Design Course Friday April 27, 2018
© 2018 Canada Masonry Design Centre 6
Determine Moment Capacity of Cross-section
Normal to Bed Joints
Out-of-Plane Wall Reinforcement• Single Bar Equivalent • Single Layer
• Double Layer in Some Instances (e.g. 30 cm units)
• Tolerances • Tension Reinforcement is not Required to Yield
• … except for Slender Walls with kh/t > 30 • Compression Reinforcement not Typical
• Difficult to provide
-
Engineered Masonry Design Course Friday April 27, 2018
© 2018 Canada Masonry Design Centre 7
Design Assumptions
Equivalent Section for Analysis• Need not analyze entire wall
length• Determine equivalent “per
meter” effective cross-section
• Aligns with distributed loadsbeff = 1,000 mm/m
f′m,gr
f′m,gr
As, eff As 1,000mm/m
s
d
d
As = 200 mm2200 mm
-
Engineered Masonry Design Course Friday April 27, 2018
© 2018 Canada Masonry Design Centre 8
No Axial LoadLet Pf = 0
Assumptions1. β1c < tf (solving with f′m,ug)2. εs > εy
εmu
εs
C
T
εc
εd c
f′m,gr or f′m,ug
Strain Compatibility
Force Equilibrium
When Compression Block Lies in Face Shell
-
Engineered Masonry Design Course Friday April 27, 2018
© 2018 Canada Masonry Design Centre 9
Moment Resistance
C
TMr C d
β1c2
Property Wall6.0 m
Equivalent 1,000mm/m(Including Grout)
Equivalent 1,000mm/m(Neglecting Grout)
b 6,000 mm 1,000 mm/mAs 200 mm2 1,000 mm2/ms 200 mm 1,000 mm/m
β1c 49.4 mm 38.1 mm
εs 0.0028 0.00456
C 2,040.6 kN 340 kN/mMr 194.4 kNꞏm 206.0 kNꞏm 32.4 kNꞏm/m 34.3 kNꞏm/mPr 0 kN 0 kN/m 0 kN/m
When Ignoring
Grout Improves
Wall Capacity
f′m,ug
f′m,gr
-
Engineered Masonry Design Course Friday April 27, 2018
© 2018 Canada Masonry Design Centre 10
Moderate Axial LoadLet Pf = 170 kN/m
Assumptions1. β1c > tf2. εs < εy
εmu
C
T
εc
εd cεs
Pf
fsε d c
c Es
Ignoring Grout
• Maximum compressive force β1c = tf• c > cb
• cgr = 79.0 mm• cug = 89.4 mm
C T P
ϕm0.85 f m, ug befftf ϕsAs, effε d c
c Es P
-
Engineered Masonry Design Course Friday April 27, 2018
© 2018 Canada Masonry Design Centre 11
Moment Resistance
C
TMr C d
β1c2Pf
Property Wall6.0 m
Equivalent 1,000mm/m(Including Grout)
Equivalent 1,000mm/m(Neglecting Grout)
b 6,000 mm 1,000 mm/mAs 200 mm2 1,000 mm2/ms 200 mm 1,000 mm/m
β1c 63.2 mm 38.6 mm (c = 89.4 mm)εs 0.00156 0.00103
C 2,610 kN 2,067 kN 435.0 kN/m 344.5 kN/mMr 231 kNꞏm 208 kNꞏm 38.5 kNꞏm/m 34.7 kNꞏm/mPr 1,020 kN 170 kN/m 170 kN/m
High Axial LoadLet Pf = 670 kN/m
Assumptions1. c > d2. Section MUST be
designed as Unreinforced
C
Pf
εmu εmc
εmt
-
Engineered Masonry Design Course Friday April 27, 2018
© 2018 Canada Masonry Design Centre 12
Unreinforced Behaviour in a Reinforced Wall
• Out-of-Plane Walls• Reinforcement at
mid-depth• Once under
compression, wall behaves as unreinforced
• Analysis per Cl. 7.2
When c ≥ d
Mf / Pf > 0.33t Must Remain “Uncracked”
Linear Elastic
Compression Controlled Tension Controlled
Mf / Pf ≤ 0.33t Permitted to be
“Cracked”
Equivalent Stress Block
Unreinforced Behaviour in a Reinforced Wall
σ PfAeMfSe
0.5ϕmf m PfAeMfSe ϕmft
PfAe
MfSe
Mr 0.5ϕmf mPfAe Se
Mr ϕmftPfAe Se
Pr = C = ϕmχ(0.85 f′m,gr)bβ1c Mr = C × (d-β1c/2)
-
Engineered Masonry Design Course Friday April 27, 2018
© 2018 Canada Masonry Design Centre 13
Section Permitted to Crack?
• Assume Mf / Pf < 0.33t • Pf = Pr = 670 kN/m = C• Mf = Mr
Mr C d β1c2 47.8kN m/m
MrPr
47.8670
71.3mm 80mm
Moment Resistance
CMr C d
β1c2
Property Wall Equivalent 1,000mm/mb 6,000 mm 1,000 mm/mAs 200 mm2 1,000 mm2/ms 200 mm 1,000 mm/m
β1c 97.3 mmεs N/AC 4,020 kN 670 kN/mMr 286.8 kNꞏm 47.8 kNꞏm/mPr 4,020 kN 670 kN/m
Pf
-
Engineered Masonry Design Course Friday April 27, 2018
© 2018 Canada Masonry Design Centre 14
Maximum Axial LoadSolve for Pf = 1,321.9 kN/m
Assumptions1. c > d2. Section MUST be
designed as UnreinforcedC
Pf
εmu
Moment Resistance
CMr C d
β1c2
Property Wall Equivalent 1,000mm/mb 6,000 mm 1,000 mm/mAs 200 mm2 1,000 mm2/ms 200 mm 1,000 mm/m
β1c 192 mmεs N/AC 7,931.4 kN 1,321.9 kN/mMr 190.2 kNꞏm 31.7 kNꞏm/mPr 7,931.4 kN 1,321.9 kN/m
Pf
MrPr
31.71,321.9 24mm 80mm
-
Engineered Masonry Design Course Friday April 27, 2018
© 2018 Canada Masonry Design Centre 15
Review
• Fully-Grouted Wall with Closely-Spaced Reinforcement• Moment Resistance Determined
• Effects of Axial Load and Reinforcement Ratio• Equivalent Section for Analysis
• In terms of a “per meter” equivalency• As,eff, beff, Loads and moments “/m”
• Moment about centre of wall• Cancel out reinforcement and axial load
Moment Capacity
High Axial Loads Reinforcement under
compressionWall behaves as “Unreinforced”
Moderate Axial Loads & Moderate ρCompression zone outside
face shell May count grout and use
f′m,gr, or f’mug; εs > εy or εs < εy
Low Axial Loads & Low ρSmall compression zone
could be in face shellMay be able to neglect grout
and use f′m,ug, εs >> εy
• Effects of changing Pf in Out-of-Plane walls
• Changes Depth of Effective Compression Block
• When to Ignore Grout
• Interaction with Axial Load
-
Engineered Masonry Design Course Friday April 27, 2018
© 2018 Canada Masonry Design Centre 16
Flexure & Axial Load Resistance:
-Fully-Grouted -Out-of-Plane Walls-Wide-Spaced Reinforcement
(Pages 376-380)Cl. 10 CSA S304
Equivalent Section for Analysis• Wide-Spaced Reinforcement• Consider a 20M @ 1.2m
• From Before• f’m,gr = 13.5 MPa• f’m,ug = 17.5 MPa• tf = 38.6• d = 120 mm
beff = 1,000 mm/m
f′m,gr
f′m,gr
As, eff As 1,000mm/m
s
d
d
As = 300 mm21,200 mm
-
Engineered Masonry Design Course Friday April 27, 2018
© 2018 Canada Masonry Design Centre 17
Effective Compression Zone Width
Similar to Flanged Beams or Walls
1.2 m
4 x 240 = 960 mm
Equivalent Section for Analysis• When Reinforcement is under
Tension• β1c ≤ tf
• f’m,ug• β1c > tf
• f’m,gr
1,000 mm/m
f′m,gr
f′m,grorf′m,ug
d
d
beff = 800 mm/m
beff 960mm 1,000mm/m1,200mm 800mm/m
As,eff = 250 mm2/m
As = 300 mm21,200 mm
-
Engineered Masonry Design Course Friday April 27, 2018
© 2018 Canada Masonry Design Centre 18
No Axial LoadLet Pf = 0
Assumptions1. β1c < tf2. εs > εy
εmu
εs
C
T
εc
εd c
f′m,gr or f′m,ug
Strain Compatibility
Force Equilibrium
Moment Resistance
C
TMr C d
β1c2
Property Wall Equivalent 1,000mm/mb 6,000 mm 800 mm/mAs 200 mm2 250 mm2/ms 200 mm 1,000 mm/m
β1c 11.9 mmεs 0.0212C 510 kN 85 kN/mMr 51.6 kNꞏm 8.6 kNꞏm/mPr 0 kN 0 kN/m
-
Engineered Masonry Design Course Friday April 27, 2018
© 2018 Canada Masonry Design Centre 19
High Axial LoadLet Pf = 670 kN/m
Assumptions1. c > d 2. No Effective Compression Zone
from Cl. 10.6 3. Section MUST be designed as
Unreinforced
C
Pf
εmu εmc
εmt
beff = 1,000 mm/m
Review
• Differences from Closely-Spaced Reinforcement
• Equivalent Section for Analysis• Effective Compression Zone Width • Similar to Flanges• Only when Reinforcement is Under Tension
• Reinforcement under Compression• Exact same analysis• No Effective Compression Zone
-
Engineered Masonry Design Course Friday April 27, 2018
© 2018 Canada Masonry Design Centre 20
Moment Capacity
High Axial Loads
Reinforcement under compressionNo Effective Compression Zone
Exact same design as closely-spaced wall
Moderate Axial Loads & Moderate ρSame process as closely-spaced reinforcement with new
valuesNew beff, As,eff
Check εs, β1c < tf
Low Axial Loads & Low ρ
Effective Compression Zone Width Include or Neglect Grout
Flexure & Axial Load Resistance:
-Partially-Grouted -Out-of-Plane Walls-Wide-Spaced Reinforcement
(Pages 376-380)Cl. 10 CSA S304
-
Engineered Masonry Design Course Friday April 27, 2018
© 2018 Canada Masonry Design Centre 21
Equivalent Section for Analysis• Grouted Cell• May neglect grout for only face
shells1,000 mm/m
f′m,ugd
d
beff = 800 mm/m
f′m,gr
As,eff = 250 mm2/m
As = 300 mm21,200 mm
Considering Grout
beff,ug = 633.3 mm/m
beff,gr = 166.7 mm/m
beff,ug = 800 mm/m
beff, gr 200mm 1,000mm/m1,200mm 166.67mm/m
-
Engineered Masonry Design Course Friday April 27, 2018
© 2018 Canada Masonry Design Centre 22
Moderate Axial LoadLet Pf = 250 kN/m
Assumptions1. β1c > tf2. εs < εy
εmu
T
εc
εd cεs
Pf
fsε d c
c EsCug = ϕmχ (0.85)f′m,ugbeff,ugtfCgr = ϕmχ (0.85) f′m,grbeff,grβ1c
CugCgr
Moment Resistance
Cug
T
Mr Cug dtf2 Cgr d
β1c2
Property Wall Equivalent 1,000mm/mb 6,000 mm 1,000 mm/m
beff,ug 4,800 mm 633.3 mm/mbeff,gr 1,200 mm 166.7 mm/mAs 300 mm2 250 mm2/ms 1,200 mm 1,000 mm/m
β1c 69.7 mmεs 0.00113
Cug 1,309 kN 218.2 kN/mCgr 480 kN 80.0 kN/mMr 172.7 kNꞏm 28.8 kNꞏm/mPr 1,500 kN 250 kN/m
Pf
Cgr
-
Engineered Masonry Design Course Friday April 27, 2018
© 2018 Canada Masonry Design Centre 23
When Ignoring
Grout Improves
Wall Capacity
f′m,ug
f′m,gr
f′m,ugf′m,ug
High Axial LoadLet Pf = 400 kN/m
Assumptions1. c > d2. Section MUST be
designed as Unreinforced
Pf
εmu εmc
εmt
As c > d
CugCgr
beff,ug = 833.3 mm/m
beff,gr = 166.7 mm/m
-
Engineered Masonry Design Course Friday April 27, 2018
© 2018 Canada Masonry Design Centre 24
Section Permitted to Crack?
• Assume Mf / Pf < 0.33t • Pf = Pr = 400 kN/m
• Cug = 287.1 kN/m• Cgr = 112.9 kN/m
• Mf = Mr
MrPr
37.0400 92.5mm 80mm
Mr Cug dtf2 Cgr d
β1c2 37.0kN · m/m
Maximum Design Moment
Take the Greater of:
1. Limit Mr for crack analysisa) Mr = Pf × 0.33t =
32.0 kNꞏm/m
2. Check if higher eccentricity possible for “section not permitted to crack”a) Tension controlledb) Compression controlled
-
Engineered Masonry Design Course Friday April 27, 2018
© 2018 Canada Masonry Design Centre 25
When c ≥ d
Mf / Pf > 0.33t Must Remain “Uncracked”
Linear Elastic
Compression Controlled Tension Controlled
Mf / Pf ≤ 0.33t Permitted to be
“Cracked”
Equivalent Stress Block
Unreinforced Behaviour in a Reinforced Wall
σ PfAeMfSe
0.5ϕmf m PfAe
MfSe ϕmft
PfAe
MfSe
Mr 0.5ϕmf mPfAe Se
Mr ϕmftPfAe Se
Pr = C = ϕmχ(0.85 f′m,gr)bβ1c Mr = C × (d-β1c/2)
Elastic Wall Properties
• Textbook• Table B.4• Page 753
• Neglect Reinforcement• Equivalent Wall Section
f mbeff, ugAe, ugf m, ug beff, grAe, grf m, grbeff, ugAe, ug beff, grAe, gr
16.0MPa
ftbeff, ugAe, ugft, ug beff, grAe, grft, grbeff, ugAe, ug beff, grAe, gr
0.50MPa
Aebeff, ugAe, ug beff, grAe, grbeff, ug beff, gr
104,300mm2/m
Sebeff, ugSe, ug beff, grSe, grbeff, ug beff, gr
7,100,000mm3/m
Iobeff, ugIo, ug beff, grIo, grbeff, ug beff, gr
852,000,000mm4/m
-
Engineered Masonry Design Course Friday April 27, 2018
© 2018 Canada Masonry Design Centre 26
Tension or Compression Controlled
• Elastic Stress Analysis• Best Practice
• Limiting compressive stress in masonry to 0.5f′m as elastic limit
• Determine which moment governs
Compression Controlled
Mr 0.5ϕmf mPfAe Se
Tension Controlled
Mr ϕmftPfAe Se
Flexure & Axial Load Resistance:
-Partially-Grouted -Out-of-Plane Walls-Wide-Spaced Eccentric Reinforcement
(Pages 376-380)Cl. 10 CSA S304
-
Engineered Masonry Design Course Friday April 27, 2018
© 2018 Canada Masonry Design Centre 27
Out-of-Plane Loads
• Positive and Negative wind pressures
• Often equal or close• 2-Layers of vertical
reinforcement • When loads greater in one
direction• 1-Layer of vertical
reinforcement close to tension face
Eccentric Rebar
-
Engineered Masonry Design Course Friday April 27, 2018
© 2018 Canada Masonry Design Centre 28
Shear Resistance:
-Out-of-Plane Shear-Sliding Shear
(Pages 398-399)Cl. 10 CSA S304
Out-of-Plane Shear
-
Engineered Masonry Design Course Friday April 27, 2018
© 2018 Canada Masonry Design Centre 29
Out-of-Plane Shear Resistance
• f′m,eff = 16.0 MPa• Mf/Vfdv = 1• v = 0.64 MPa• d = 120 mm• b = bwebs + beff,gr
• Includes webs• CSA A165 estimate min.
Out-of-Plane Sliding Shear