Martin Invention Commercialization Ver 2

43
1 University Tech Transfer Process: Invention Commercialization The 4th Annual Conference on Technology Commercialization “Technology Transfer (R&D and IP Commercialization, Policies, and Investment)” Amman, Jordan (12 Nov 2008) Michael J. Martin President, TechTransfer Associates

description

4th Technology Commercialization Conference AmmanMartin Invention Commercialization Ver 2

Transcript of Martin Invention Commercialization Ver 2

Page 1: Martin Invention Commercialization Ver 2

1

University Tech Transfer Process: Invention Commercialization

The 4th Annual Conference on TechnologyCommercialization

“Technology Transfer (R&D and IP Commercialization,Policies, and Investment)”

Amman, Jordan (12 Nov 2008)

Michael J. MartinPresident, TechTransfer Associates

Page 2: Martin Invention Commercialization Ver 2

2

Industry/University: Bridging Two Cultures

UNIVERSITY INDUSTRY

“To Create and Disseminate Knowledge”

To Maximize the Investment of Shareholders

ORGANIZATION

RESEARCH DISCOVERY DISCLOSURE FEASILBITY

PATENT APPLICATIONS APPLIED r&D MARKET TEST

LICENSES COMMERCIAL OPERATTION.

SOLUTIONS PROBLEMS

Page 3: Martin Invention Commercialization Ver 2

3

Why IP: Bridging Two Cultures

University Industry

“To Create and Disseminate Knowledge”

To Maximize the Investment of Shareholders

ORGANIZATION

SOLUTION PROBLEM

• Different Missions, Measure Success Differently• IP: Dissemination for University, Competitive

Advantage for Business

Page 4: Martin Invention Commercialization Ver 2

4

Why Manage IP in Universities• Disseminate Knowledge – “Public Good”

• Outreach mission (Economic Development): From Morrill Act to Bayh Dole Act – 1980

• Retain/Attract Faculty

• “Home Run” – Additional Source of Funds

• Results– $40 billion in economic activity that supported more than 270,000 jobs – 432 Start-ups and 4955 licenses in FY 2003

Page 5: Martin Invention Commercialization Ver 2

5

University IP Policy/Practice

COI/COC

PatentCopyright

Law

Bayh-DoleLaw

InternalRevenue

Code

StateCode SCHE

Guidelines

University Tech Transfer Policy/Practice

Research ContractNegotiations

Ownership of Intellectual

Property

Commercialization of

IntellectualProperty

University Culture

Page 6: Martin Invention Commercialization Ver 2

6

Invention

PatentingPatent Atty

DisclosureEvaluation

Marketing

Licensing

Protect if Publication is Imm

inent

TECH TRANSFER: COMPLEX SYSTEM

Products

BusinessSpin offs

Research Investment

Page 7: Martin Invention Commercialization Ver 2

7

Evaluation then Valuation of Intellectual Property

• Commercialization Decision– Technical Merit– Commercial Opportunity– Protectable

• Licensing Negotiations– Cost Approach– Market Approach– Income Approach– Relief from Royalty

Page 8: Martin Invention Commercialization Ver 2

8

Assessment of Early Stage Discovery Technical Merit

• Stage of Development

• Translate Science into Function into Benefit

• “Robust Solution” to “Important Problem”

• Implementation Barriers

Page 9: Martin Invention Commercialization Ver 2

9

Assessment of Early Stage Discovery Commercial Opportunity

• Market Size and Growth

• Identified Niche and Innovators

• Market Entry Strategy: Product, Price, Promotion, Position

• Competitive Advantage

• Management Team

Case 4 Discount Rate 20% Royalty Rate 1.0%

($4,000,000)

($3,000,000)

($2,000,000)

($1,000,000)

$0

$1,000,000

$2,000,000

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

NPV of net inc

cum NPV of net

Page 10: Martin Invention Commercialization Ver 2

10

Assessment of Early Stage Discovery Protectability

• Appropriate Protection: Trade Secret, Patent, Copyright, Know How, Trademark

• Broad v. Narrow• Freedom to Operate• Prior Art; esp. of inventor• Registration Requirements

Page 11: Martin Invention Commercialization Ver 2

11

Evaluation: Inventor - Degree of Interest, Attitude and Motivation

• Interest: IP is another publication or method to impact society.

• Attitude: No time or willing to do what it takes

• Motivation: $ or move invention from lab to marketplace

Page 12: Martin Invention Commercialization Ver 2

12

Invention

PatentingPatent Atty

DisclosureEvaluation

Marketing

Licensing

Protect if Publication is Imm

inent

TECH TRANSFER: COMPLEX SYSTEM

Products

BusinessSpin offs

Research Investment

Inventor/Additional Develop

Page 13: Martin Invention Commercialization Ver 2

13

Invention Disclosures: Solicitation and Information

• Walk the halls– Identify Areas of Market Interest– Attend Department Meetings

• Industry Forums, Invite Speakers• Create Events for Interaction

– Workshops on IP and Research, etc.– Patent Award or Invention Recognition Ceremonies

• Manage Expectations

Page 14: Martin Invention Commercialization Ver 2

14

Invention

PatentingPatent Atty

DisclosureEvaluation

Marketing

Licensing

Protect if Publication is Imm

inent

TECH TRANSFER: COMPLEX SYSTEM

Products

BusinessSpin offs

Research Investment

Inventor/Additional Develop

Page 15: Martin Invention Commercialization Ver 2

15

Intellectual Property Protection

• Appropriate Protection: Trade Secret, Patent, Copyright, Know How, Trademark

• Timing: Status of Publications• If Patent:

– Select Appropriate Counsel– Docket Management System– TTO is facilitator not legal resource

Page 16: Martin Invention Commercialization Ver 2

16

Invention

PatentingPatent Atty

DisclosureEvaluation

Marketing

Licensing

Protect if Publication is Imm

inent

TECH TRANSFER: COMPLEX SYSTEM

Products

BusinessSpin offs

Research Investment

Inventor/Additional Develop

Page 17: Martin Invention Commercialization Ver 2

17

Marketing

• Analysis – Expand Evaluation

• Potential Licensees – Qualification

• Contact – Prepare Story, Personnel

• Confidential Disclosures – Expand Interest

Page 18: Martin Invention Commercialization Ver 2

18

Develop Contacts•Inventor network

•Business network

•Internet Listings, Web Site

•Industry and Professional Associations

•Trade Shows

•Patent Citations

•Technology Management Firms

Page 19: Martin Invention Commercialization Ver 2

19

Start-ups: Culture and Support

• Where is Leadership: Creative Destruction, Permission to Fail

• Conflict of Interest: State Law, University Policy, and Shareholder Value:

• Access to: Patient Risk Capital; Business Start-up Services; Appropriate Risk Management.

Page 20: Martin Invention Commercialization Ver 2

20

$ needed at the stage of Business Development

Pre-Seed

Invention/RawTechnology

Technologist /founder/business development

<$500K

Identifying technology via relationships

Determining commercial viability

Accessing rights Dev. business

strategy

Seed Early Stage Mid-Stage Exit

Description

Team

$ Needed

Keys to Success

Prototype/ Product-in-development

Plus first senior mgmt team member

$250K to $1M

Finding development partners

Developing business strategy

Recruiting BOD & SAB

Recruiting CEO

Product at beta clients

Senior mgmt team formation

$1M to $5M

Growing the sales pipeline

BOD and SAB in place

Full customer pipeline

Senior mgmt team in place

$2M to $20M

Managing growth

Achieving profitable

Identifying exits

Business Expansion

Public Markets

Page 21: Martin Invention Commercialization Ver 2

21

Access to Capital:Technology Policy Framework

Friends and Family SBIR/STTR Corporate Funding Bootstrapping Angel Investors Venture Capital

The ValleyThe ValleyOfOf

DeathDeath

Availa

bili

ty o

f C

apit

al

Availa

bili

ty o

f C

apit

al

BasicBasicResearchResearch

Development &Scale-up

CommercialOperation

Source: Richard Palmer, Business Specialist Advanced Technology Program National Institute of Standards and Technology.

Page 22: Martin Invention Commercialization Ver 2

22

Friends and Family

• Easiest to approach

• Need to advise risk

• Have plan prepared

• Can distract from business

Sources of Capital (Study of INC 500 by Babson College)

Friends and Family Other

Bank Loans Venture Capital

Page 23: Martin Invention Commercialization Ver 2

23

Is SBIR the Way to Go?

Plus Side• “Free” R&D• Income on the P&L• Leverages other investment• Potential customer in funding

agency

Minus Side•Doesn’t advance Business Development•Government accounting•Can be distracting•Can get HOOKED!

Page 24: Martin Invention Commercialization Ver 2

24

Corporate Opportunities in the Valley of Death

• Reduce Risk to Corporation by Leveraging University Equity/Gap Fund Screen

• Potential Relationships– Equity Investment– Strategic Partnership: Corporation brings

Manufacturing and Marketing Expertise– Potential Customer

Page 25: Martin Invention Commercialization Ver 2

25

Bootstrapping

• Belief is that income can fund growth• Have customers identified, even orders• Seek line of credit to provide working capital• Manage accounts receivable, Use the customers

cash • Be willing and able to turn down business

Page 26: Martin Invention Commercialization Ver 2

Angel Investor Basics

• Accredited investor defined by Regulation D under the Securities Act of 1933 or SEC Rule 501

• Must have a net worth in excess of $1M or annual salary in excess of $200,000 the past two years

• Typically considered an expert in a particular market

Page 27: Martin Invention Commercialization Ver 2

Investment Profile for Angel Investors

• Technology based (as opposed to service)• Strong barriers to entry for competition• High growth prospects (multiple million dollar market or

higher)• Strong management team or entrepreneur’s track

record• Viable exit opportunity for investors (acquisition or IPO)

Page 28: Martin Invention Commercialization Ver 2

28

THINK LIKE A VC

• Skimming the cream, not playing the margins• First dollars in will want to own 40-60% of the company• The perils of common shares and cram downs• Perspectives on “investor hierarchy”• Faculty role and grad student role in start-up• When and what is the exit scenario?• Technology is 5% of the start-up

Page 29: Martin Invention Commercialization Ver 2

29

Example: New Nanotechnology Material

• High VC Buzz Factor• Impact all markets• Basic Science is of High

Interest• Virginia Tech

– Improved Yield– Inventor Published– Attract Grants

Page 30: Martin Invention Commercialization Ver 2

30

LUNA nanoMaterials

Acquisition & IPO

Universities

IndustryGovernment

Private & Industrial

$

Ideas & Funding

Page 31: Martin Invention Commercialization Ver 2

31

Invention

PatentingPatent Atty

DisclosureEvaluation

Marketing

Licensing

Protect if Publication is Imm

inent

TECH TRANSFER: COMPLEX SYSTEM

Products

BusinessSpin offs

Research Investment

Page 32: Martin Invention Commercialization Ver 2

32

Negotiation - Style

• Prepare your position/Understand theirs• Request an offer• Listen Actively… and carefully• Probe their rationale and yours• Create options/make counter offers• Confirm agreement and benefits to each side• Close firmly, amicably, and define the next step.

Page 33: Martin Invention Commercialization Ver 2

33

Negotiation - Valuation• Cost Approach - Cost to create and develop or to replace

the assets • Market Approach - Based on comparable transactions

between unrelated parties • Income Approach - Based on the present value of the

future income streams expected from the asset• Relief from Royalty - Measured by what the owner of the

property would pay in royalties

Page 34: Martin Invention Commercialization Ver 2

34

Valuation – Cost Approach• Cost to create and develop or to replace the assets

• No party would pay more to use than to replace the asset in an arm's-length transaction

• Historical costs or the projected cost to develop an asset of similar value at similar level

• Appropriate– Embryonic, basic technology for which market applications

cannot yet be defined. – Technology is narrow in scope and easy to replicate or

"design around

Page 35: Martin Invention Commercialization Ver 2

35

Valuation – Market Approach • Based on comparable transactions

between unrelated parties

• Factors to consider– Nature of the assets transferred, – Industry and products involved, – Agreement terms, and other factors

Page 36: Martin Invention Commercialization Ver 2

36

Page 37: Martin Invention Commercialization Ver 2

37

Valuation – Income Approach• Based on the present value of the future

income streams expected from the asset• Forecasting the useful life of the property

– the service life of the asset– the legal life of the asset– the economic life of the asset – the functional or technological life

Page 38: Martin Invention Commercialization Ver 2

38

Valuation – Income ApproachRisk Assessment for the Discount Rate

– Technical Risk: Stage of Development, $, Time, Obsolescence

– Market Barriers: Concentration, Distribution, Diffuse

– Management Team: Fit, Expertise, Core Competencies

– Protection: Type, Breadth, Strength, Blocking

Page 39: Martin Invention Commercialization Ver 2

39

Valuation - Relief from Royalty• Measured by what the owner of the property would pay

in royalties • Assumes:

– Stage of Development: products could be produced within a reasonable period of time.

– Sufficient data to develop reasonable estimates of the royalty base (i.e., projected revenues).

– Data to support the determination of a reasonable royalty rate.

– Accounts for market conditions, the economic life of the Technologies and the risk associated with receiving future economic benefits.

Page 40: Martin Invention Commercialization Ver 2

40

Royalty Rates for In-Licensing by IndustryRose Ann Dabek

Procter & Gamble

Industry 0-2% 2-5% 5-10% 10 -15% 15-20% 20-25% >25%

Aerospace 50% 50%          

Automotive 52.5% 45% 2.5%        

Chemical 16.5% 58.1% 24.3% 0.8% 0.4%    

Computer 62.5% 31.3% 6.3%        

Electronics   50% 25% 25%      

Energy   66.7%       33.3%  

Food/Consumer   100%          

General MFG. 45% 28.6% 12.1% 14.3%      

Gov't/University 25% 25% 50%        

Health Care 3.3% 51.7% 45%        

Pharmaceuticals 23.6% 32.1% 29.3% 12.5v 1.1v 0.7% 0.7%

Telecommunications 40% 37.3% 23.6%        

Page 41: Martin Invention Commercialization Ver 2

41

License Agreements

• Start with your boilerplate.• Focus on Definitions, Grant, and Consideration

- Make sure they are clear• Read and Think about ALL of the Clauses

- Pay attention to the “little clauses”

Page 42: Martin Invention Commercialization Ver 2

42

Conclusions• Always Keep in Mind the Mission of the University vs. the

Company• Companies

– Remember Boundaries of Law and Policy– Understand How Success is Measured

• Universities– Remember why interested in industry– Appreciate the goals of business and measures of success.

• Maintain Good Lines of Communications• Try to Build Long-Term Relationships

Page 43: Martin Invention Commercialization Ver 2

43

Invention

PatentingPatent Atty

DisclosureEvaluation

Marketing

Licensing

Protect if Publication is Imm

inent

Questions ?????

Products

BusinessSpin offs

Research Investment