Marlington Local School District...IRN: 049882 Printed on August 17, 2017 Page 3 of 31 2015 - 2016...

IRN: 049882 of 31Printed on August 17, 2017

Marlington Local School District2015 - 2016 Report Card for

Coming in

2018

DISTRICT GRADE

Achievement

Performance Index

Indicators MetD

CCOMPONENT GRADE Progress

Value-Added

Students with Disabilities.....................................................................................

Lowest 20% in Achievement..............................................................................

BCOMPONENT GRADE

The Achievement component represents the numberof students who passed the state tests and how wellthey performed on them.

The Progress component looks closely at thegrowth that all students are making based ontheir past performances.

C

62.1%............................................................................................................................................

75.4%..........................................................................................................................

Overall...................................................................................................................

Gifted...................................................................................................................

CABC

Gap Closing

Annual Measurable Objectives34.0%............................................................................................................................................

F

FCOMPONENT GRADE Graduation Rate

Graduation Ratesof students graduated in 4 years...................................................................................94.7%of students graduated in 5 years.................................................................................94.1%

ACOMPONENT GRADE

The Gap Closing component shows how well schoolsare meeting the performance expectations for ourmost vulnerable populations of students in Englishlanguage arts, math and graduation.

The Graduation Rate component looks at thepercent of students who are successfully finishinghigh school with a diploma in four or five years.

BA

K-3 Literacy

DCOMPONENT GRADE Prepared for Success

CCOMPONENT GRADE

The K-3 Literacy component looks at how successfulthe school is at getting struggling readers on track toproficiency in third grade and beyond.

Whether training in a technical field or preparingfor work or college, the Prepared for Successcomponent looks at how well prepared Ohio’sstudents are for all future opportunities.

43.0%....................................................................................................................................................................

DK-3 Literacy Improvement


2015 - 2016 Report Card for Marlington Local School District

AchievementThe Achievement component represents the number of students whopassed the state tests and how well they performed on them.

CCOMPONENT GRADE

0.0 ===

0.01.3xxx

Advanced PlusAdvanced

AcceleratedProficient

BasicLimited

Untested

1.21.11.00.60.30.0

20.322.827.416.113.50.0

24.325.027.49.64.00.0

90.5xxxx

====

0

20

40 60

80

100

CGRADE Performance Index

The Performance Index measures the test results of every student, not just those whoscore proficient or higher. There are six levels on the index and districts receive pointsfor every student in each of these levels. The higher the achievement level the morethe points awarded in the district's index. This rewards schools and districts forimproving the performance of all students, regardless of achievement level.

75.4%

Performance Index

90.5 of a possible 120.0

A = 90.0 - 100.0%B = 80.0 - 89.9%C = 70.0 - 79.9%D = 50.0 - 69.9%F = 0.0 - 49.9%

20.3

22.8

27.4

13.5

16.1Advanced PlusAdvancedAcceleratedProficientLimitedBasicUntested

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

101.2 102.2 101.696.4

90.5

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

UntestedPerformance Index

Points

LimitedPerformance Index

Points

BasicPerformance Index

Points

ProficientPerformance Index

Points

AcceleratedPerformance Index

Points

AdvancedPerformance Index

Points

Advanced PlusPerformance Index

Points

AchievementLevel

Pct ofStudents

Points forthis Level

PointsReceived

Performance Index Trend



DGRADE Indicators Met

Indicators Met measures the percent of students who have passed state tests. It alsoincludes the gifted indicator. Test results are reported for each student in a grade andsubject.

Indicators Met %

0

20

40 60

80

100

62.1%18 out of 29

A =B =C =D =F =

90.0 - 100.0%80.0 - 89.9%70.0 - 79.9%50.0 - 69.9%0.0 - 49.9%

3rd Grade

4th Grade

5th Grade

English Language Arts

Mathematics


Mathematics

Social Studies


Mathematics

Science

72.0%

76.9%

77.1%

80.6%

90.6%

74.2%

70.3%

84.5%

6th Grade

7th Grade

8th Grade


Mathematics

Social Studies


Mathematics


Mathematics

Science

64.8%

68.2%

79.4%

64.2%

55.9%

66.8%

70.0%

83.2%

Grades 3-5 Grades 6-8

OGT, 11th Graders

HS

Mathematics

Reading

Science

Social Studies

Writing

Algebra I

Biology

English I

English II

Geometry

Government

History

91.2%

93.6%

90.1%

91.8%

92.9%

57.3%

72.8%

68.9%

61.7%

49.5%

82.5%

83.8%

High School

GIFTED INDICATOR



Achievement Levels by Grade Proficient Percent Trend by Grade

3rd Grade

52%56%60%

64%68%72%76%80%

72.0%

76.9%

63.8%

73.5%

54.9%

65.8%

Reading Mathematics

District Similar Districts State Average

68%72%76%80%84%88%92%96%

100%

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Reading Mathematics All Tests

3rd Grade

4th Grade

55%60%65%70%75%80%85%90%95%

77.1%80.6%

90.6%

62.5%

78.5%83.2%

57.5%

69.2%

75.8%

Reading Mathematics Social Studies


68%72%76%80%84%88%92%96%

100%

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Reading Mathematics Social Studies All Tests

4th Grade

5th Grade

60%64%68%

72%76%80%84%88%

74.2%70.3%

84.5%

65.3%

72.9%76.7%

60.2%62.4%

67.5%

Reading Mathematics Science


65%70%75%

80%85%90%95%

100%

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Reading Mathematics Science All Tests

5th Grade



6th Grade

52%56%60%64%68%72%76%80%84%

64.8%68.2%

79.4%

58.9%61.1%

68.6%

54.0%56.7%

61.2%

Reading Mathematics Social Studies


60%65%70%75%80%85%90%95%

100%

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Reading Mathematics Social Studies All Tests

6th Grade

7th Grade

52%54%56%

58%60%62%64%66%

64.2%

55.9%57.8%

60.8%

53.6%55.3%

Reading Mathematics


55%60%65%70%75%80%85%90%95%

100%

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Reading Mathematics All Tests

7th Grade

8th Grade

45%50%55%60%65%70%75%80%85%

66.8%70.0%

83.2%

49.1%

63.2%

73.0%

47.5%52.7%

64.9%

Reading Mathematics Science


65%70%75%

80%85%90%95%

100%

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Reading Mathematics Science All Tests

8th Grade

11th Grade Cumulative OGT 11th Grade Cumulative OGT



82%84%86%

88%90%92%94%96%

93.6% 92.9%91.2% 91.8%

90.1%

95.1% 93.4% 93.6% 92.6%90.6%92.1%

89.6%88.0% 87.5%

83.3%

Reading Writing Mathematics Social Studies Science


88%

90%

92%94%

96%

98%

100%

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Reading Writing Mathematics Social StudiesScience

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2015 2016

GovernmentProficient %

HistoryProficient %

Physical ScienceProficient %

English IProficient %

English IIProficient %

Algebra IProficient %

GeometryProficient %

BiologyProficient %

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

82.5% 83.8%

68.9%

61.7%

57.3%

49.5%

72.8%

76.8%79.2%

57.4%

53.5%

50.0%

53.7%

70.9%67.6%

74.5%

55.4% 53.4%

48.0%49.0%

65.4%

Government History English I English II Algebra I Geometry Biology


High SchoolHigh School



Gifted StudentsThe Gifted Students data and Indicator highlight the opportunities forand performance of gifted students. The dashboard answers severalquestions: How many students are identified as gifted and in what

categories? How many of those students are receiving gifted services?How well are those gifted students performing? The Gifted Indicator

measures whether opportunity and performance expectations are beingmet for gifted students.

INDICATOR

Not Met

The Gifted Indicator is derived from three components: Gifted Value Added grade, thePerformance Index for gifted students, and a Gifted Inputs score.

Gifted Value Added

Districts must earn a Gifted Value Added grade of Cor better to meet the Gifted Value Added

component. A grade of "NR" results in Not Met ifthe district has an ADM of 600 or more.

Gifted Performance Index

Districts with at least 10 unique students in theGifted Performance Index calculation must score116.0 or better to meet the Gifted Performance

Index component.

Gifted Inputs

Points are earned based on identification andservices provided to gifted students. Districts mustearn at least 60 points out of a possible 100 to meet

the Gifted Inputs component.

Gifted Indicator Final Result

The Gifted Indicator is Met if none of the threecomponents are Not Met. Gifted Inputs alone

cannot determine the Gifted Indicator, however; ifboth the Value Added and Performance Index

components are NC, then the Gifted Indicator is alsoNC.

INDICATOR

Not Met

Total Points:Gifted Inputs Met?: Not Met

59.0

Performance Index:Performance Index Met?:

115.396

Not Met

Value Added Grade:Enrollment:

Value Added Met?

B2,281

1

Overview Performance Index

0

20

40 60

80

100

96.2%115.396 of a possible 120.0

A = 90.0 - 100.0%B = 80.0 - 89.9%C = 70.0 - 79.9%D =50.0 - 69.9%F = 0.0 - 49.9%

AchievementLevel

Pct ofStudents

Points forthis Level

PointsReceived

Advanced Plus 0.0 x 1.3 = 0.0Advanced 68.7 x 1.2 = 82.4

Accelerated 22.6 x 1.1 = 24.9Proficient 7.2 x 1.0 = 7.2

Basic 1.5 x 0.6 = 0.9Limited 0.0 x 0.3 = 0.0

Untested 0.0 x 0.0 = 0.0115.396

68.7

22.6

7.21.5

Advanced PlusAdvancedAcceleratedProficientLimitedBasicUntested

The Performance Index calculation for gifted students. Only teststaken by students identified as gifted in that subject (e.g. gifted in

Math and taking the Math test), or taken by students identified withSuper Cognitive abilities regardless of test subject are included.



Gifted IndicatorThe Gifted Inputs calculation assigns points based on the percentage of students identified and served in eight categories (factors). The points earned for each category are totaled to determine the final Met/Not Met

determination for the Gifted Input component.

Reading, Math, Science, Social Studies, and Superior Cognitive Abilities

K-3

94.9%

2.2%2.8%

4-8

86.7%

10.9%

2.4%

9-12

86.7%

11.0%

2.3%

Visual/Performing Arts and Creative Thinking

K-3 4-8 9-12

100.0% 0.3%99.7% 0.5%99.5%

Disadvantaged Students

2.8%2.1%95.1%

Minority Students

2.8%0.6%96.6%

Receiving Gifted Services Identified as Gifted, butnot receiving services

Not Identified as Gifted



Identification and Services

Grades K-3

0.0%

0.5%

1.0%

1.5%

2.0%

2.5%

3.0%

3.5%

4.0%

4.5%

2.7%

4.4%

1.5%

0.6%

1.9%

0.9%

Math Reading Superior Cognitive

Identified Receiving Services

Grades 4-8

0.0%1.0%

2.0%3.0%

4.0%5.0%

6.0%7.0%

8.0%9.0%

0.2%

7.6%8.0%

0.2% 0.3%

4.7%

0.1%

5.8%

7.0%

4.4%

Creative ThinkingMath

ReadingScience

Social StudiesSuperior Cognitive

Visual and Performing Arts


Grades 9-12

0.0%

1.0%

2.0%

3.0%

4.0%

5.0%

6.0%

7.0%

8.0%

0.1%

6.1% 6.2%

3.8%

0.5%

7.1%

0.4%

5.4%

4.2%

2.8%

6.2%


ReadingScience




These charts show the percentage of enrolled students that are identified as gifted and that are receiving gifted services.

All Grades

0.0%

1.0%

2.0%

3.0%

4.0%

5.0%

6.0%

7.0%

0.1%

5.8%6.5%

1.4%

0.3%

4.8%

0.2%

4.3%4.8%

1.0%

4.2%


ReadingScience






Identified and Receiving Services

Grades K-3

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

21.4%

43.5%

62.5%

Math Reading Superior Cognitive

Grades 4-8

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

0.0%

76.0%

87.4%

0.0% 0.0%

93.2%

0.0%

Creative Thinking Math Reading Science Social Studies

Superior Cognitive Visual and PerformingArts

Grades 9-12

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

0.0%

88.9%

67.4%75.0%

0.0%

86.8%

0.0%



These charts show, of the students identified as gifted, the percentage of students receiving gifted services.

All Grades

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

0.0%

74.5% 73.5% 70.0%

0.0%

87.5%

0.0%





Screening

This chart shows the percentage of students screened for gifted abilities this school year.

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

39.3% 39.3%

0.0% 0.0%

39.3%

Reading Math Social Studies ScienceSuperiorCognitive

Acceleration

Number of SubjectAccelerated Students:

0

Number of Whole-GradeAccelerated Students:

0



ProgressThe Progress component looks closely at the growth that all studentsare making based on their past performances.

BCOMPONENT GRADE

CGRADE Overall

BGRADE Gifted Students

AGRADE Students with Disabilities

CGRADE Students in the Lowest 20% in Achievement

This measures the progress for all students in math, ELA, science andsocial studies using tests in grades 4-8 and some end-of-course exams.

This measures the progress for students identified as gifted in reading,math, science, social studies and/or superior cognitive ability.

This measures the progress for students with disabilities.

This measures the progress for students identified as the lowest 20%statewide in reading, math, science or social studies achievement.

Although Progress scores are notassigned letter grades at this level ofdetail, the grading scale applied at theOverall (All Students, All Tests) level is:

A = 2.00 and upB = 1.00 to 1.99C = -1.00 to 0.99D = -2.00 to -1.01F = below -2.00

Test Grade Test SubjectMetrics Progress Score

High SchoolAlgebra I

Geometry

-4.23

-5.41

Test Grade Test SubjectMetrics Progress Score

High SchoolEnglish I

English II

-2.10

-3.48

Test GradeProgress Score

EnglishLanguage Arts Mathematics Social Studies Science All Tests

All Grades

4th Grade

5th Grade

6th Grade

7th Grade

8th Grade

1.89 -0.56 0.52 3.03 0.71

3.23 -0.43 1.98

0.60 -0.59 -0.23 -0.04

0.91 1.23 0.52 1.45

2.59 0.53 2.13

1.37 6.44 4.17 6.08

These tables show the Progress scores by test grade and subject for students in grades 4-8 and some end-of-coursetests, and includes up to three years of data as available.

Progress Details

NRGRADE High Mobility

For districts and schools with a mobility rate of 25% or higher, thismeasures the progress of a subset of students that have been in thedistrict for at least two years. This measure will not be included in theProgress component grade.



Progress vs. Performance Index

This bubble chart shows the relationship between each subgroup's Performance Index results (horizontalaxis) to the Value-Added letter grade (vertical axis). The size of the bubble represents the size of the

student subgroup.

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

OverallStudents w/ DisabilitiesLowest 20%GiftedHigh SchoolHighly Mobile

A

B

C

D

F

G r a d e

Performance Index



Gap ClosingThe Gap Closing component shows how well schools are meeting theperformance expectations for our most vulnerable populations ofstudents in English language arts, math and graduation.

FCOMPONENT GRADE

Graduation RateMathEnglish Language ArtsFGRADE Annual Measurable Objectives

Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs) compare the performance of student groups to a state goal which is displayed as the red line in the following charts. These charts show how well each group achievesthat goal in reading, math and graduation – and emphasize any achievement gaps that exist between groups. The ultimate goal is for all groups to achieve at high levels.

The red line on each graph identifies the Annual Measurable Objective. The 2016 AMO for ELA is 74.2%, for Math is 68.5%, and for Graduation Rate is 82.8%.

0 20 40 60 80 100

69.9

68.5

62.5

56.7

25.0

White All StudentsMultiracial Econ DisadvantageStudents w/ Disabilities

AMO Points

34.0%

0

20

40 60

80

100

34

A = 90.0 - 100.0%B = 80.0 - 89.9%C = 70.0 - 79.9%D = 60.0 - 69.9%F = 0.0 - 59.9%

0 20 40 60 80 100

67.6

66.9

62.5

57.3

26.4

White All StudentsMultiracial Econ DisadvantageStudents w/Disabilities

0 20 40 60 80 100

96.2

94.7

90.7

White All Students Econ Disadvantage

Subgroups with fewer than 30 students are not rated and do not appear on the graphs.



Graduation RateThe Graduation Rate component looks at the percent of students whoare successfully finishing high school with a diploma in four or fiveyears.

ACOMPONENT GRADE

D =

B =

0

20

40

60

80

100

94.7 93.6

83.0

District SimilarDistrictsState Average

4-Year Rate

0

20

40

60

80

100

94.1 94.2

84.9

District SimilarDistrictsState Average

5-Year Rate

AGRADE

4-Year Graduation RateThe 4-year graduation rate applies to the Class of 2015 who graduated within four years, i.e. students whoentered the 9th grade in 2012 and graduated by 2015.

BGRADE

5-Year Graduation RateThe 5-year graduation rate applies to the Class of 2014 who graduated within five years, i.e. students whoentered the 9th grade in 2011 and graduated by 2015.

94.7%

94.1%

A = 93.0 - 100.0%89.0 - 92.9%

C = 84.0 - 88.9%79.0 - 83.9%

F = 0.0 - 78.9%

A = 95.0 - 100.0%B = 90.0 - 94.9%C = 85.0 - 89.9%D = 80.0 - 84.9%F = 0.0 - 79.9%

0

20

40 60

80

100

0

20

40 60

80

100



Graduation Rate Trend

91%

92%

93%

94%

95%

96%

97%

92.2%

91.1%

96.0%

92.0%

94.7%94.8%

93.0%

96.6%

94.1%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

4-Year 5-Year

Note: The 5-year graduation rate does not appear in the final year of this graph because thenecessary data is not yet available to calculate the 5-year rate for that school year.



K-3 LiteracyThe K-3 Literacy component looks at how successful the school is atgetting struggling readers on track to proficiency in third grade andbeyond.

DCOMPONENT GRADE

0

20

40 60

80

100

DGRADE

43.0%

K-3 LiteracyImprovement

46 out of 107

Not On-Track atPoint A

Improving to On-Trackat Point B

Kindergarten ReadingDiagnostic, SchoolYear 2014 - 2015

< 10 to1st Grade ReadingDiagnostic, SchoolYear 2015 - 2016

< 10

1st Grade ReadingDiagnostic, SchoolYear 2014 - 2015

< 10 to2nd Grade ReadingDiagnostic, SchoolYear 2015 - 2016

< 10

2nd Grade ReadingDiagnostic, SchoolYear 2014 - 2015

< 10 to3rd Grade ReadingDiagnostic, SchoolYear 2015 - 2016

< 10

3rd Grade ReadingDiagnostic, SchoolYear 2015 - 2016

< 10 to3rd Grade ReadingOST, School Year

2015 - 2016< 10

Deduction for 3rd graders who did not pass OST and werenot on a Reading Improvement and Monitoring Plan

NC

Totals 107 46

Details of Measure

of those students reached proficiencyon the 3rd grade OAA.NC

< 10 third grade students were not on-trackthis year.

< 10

NC of those students improved to on-track in 3rd grade.

second grade students were not on-track last year.

< 10

NC of those students improved to on-track in 2nd grade.

first grade students were not on-tracklast year.

< 10

NC of those students improved to on-track in 1st grade.

kindergarten students were not on-tracklast year.

In Your District...

A = 81.4 - 100.0%B = 62.6 - 81.3%C = 43.8 - 62.5%D = 25.0 - 43.7%F = 0.0 - 24.9%



Percentage On-Track in Reading Diagnostic

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

55.6%

97.5%

87.4%

63.7%

44.4%

2.5%

12.6%

36.3%

KindergartenDiagnostic

First GradeDiagnostic

Second GradeDiagnostic

Third GradeDiagnostic

On- TrackNotOn-Track

Third Grade Reading Guarantee

Ohio's Third Grade Reading Guarantee ensures that students are successful inreading before moving on to fourth grade. Schools must provide supports forstruggling readers in early grades. If a child appears to be falling behind inreading, the school will immediately start a Reading Improvement andMonitoring Plan. The program ensures that every struggling reader gets thesupport he or she needs to learn and achieve.

Students have multiple opportunities to meet promotion requirements includingmeeting a minimum promotion score on the reading portion of the state's thirdgrade English language arts test given twice during the school year. Studentshave an additional opportunity to take the state assessment in the summer, aswell as a district-determined alternative assessment.

The Parent Roadmap is available to help parents understand how the ThirdGrade Reading Guarantee applies to your child.How many third graders met the Third Grade Reading

Guarantee requirements for promotion to 4th grade?99.4%

How many third graders scored proficient on the state Readingtest?

72.0%This chart shows the overall percentage of students that were on-track/not-on-track for each

grade level reading diagnostic in 2015-2016.



Prepared for SuccessWhether training in a technical field or preparing for work or college,the Prepared for Success component looks at how well prepared Ohio’sstudents are for all future opportunities.

CCOMPONENT GRADE

0%

20%

40% 60%

80%

100%

How Prepared were Your 2014 and 2015 Graduating Classes?

68.5%

31.5%

3.1%

2.5%

20.1%

3.6%

23.4%

11.7%

30.6%

ACT: Participation

ACT: RemediationFree

SAT: Participation

SAT: RemediationFree

Honors Diploma

Industry-RecognizedCredential

Advanced Placement:Participation

AP: Exam Score of 3or Better

Dual EnrollmentCredit

InternationalBaccalaureate

IB: Exam Score of 4or Better

0.0%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

0.0%

CCOMPONENT GRADE

Number of students that earned aremediation free score on all parts of

the ACT or SAT, earned an honorsdiploma, and/or earned an industry-

recognized credential

The number of "bonus" students thatcount an additional 0.3 bonus points

each, because they did the aboveand also earned a 3 or higher on at

least one AP exam; earned a 4 orhigher on at least one IB exam;

and/or earned at least three collegecredits before leaving high school

Number ofStudents

PointValue

PointsEarne

d

133 133.0

92 27.6

1

0.3

Total Points:

Graduation Cohort:

Percentage: 44.7%

160.6

359

Note: These data represent students in the 4-year and 5-year graduation rates, i.e. students who entered 9th grade in 2011 and 2012.

44.7%



30.9%

69.1%

60.0%

40.0%

Note: These data represent students in the 4-year and 5-year graduation rates, i.e. students who entered 9th grade in 2011 and 2012.

How Prepared were Your 2014 and 2015 Graduating Classes?

Districts and schools have long-term impacts on student outcomes. The Preparedfor Success component provides information on how schools prepare students fordifferent pathways of college and career success. It also provides insights on howthose students do once they leave high school. What happens beyond the diploma

is an important indicator of how well schools are preparing students.

The University System of Ohio provides district reports on enrollment andremediation of high school graduates attending in-state, public colleges and

universities.

What Percentage of the 2013 GraduatingClass Entered College within Two Years? 60.0

%

What Percentage of the 2009 GraduatingClass Graduated from College within Six

Years of Leaving High School?30.9%

https://www.ohiohighered.org/data-reports/college-readiness



Superintendent: Joseph A. KnollAddress: 10320 Moulin Ave NE County:

Phone: (330) 823-7458Stark

Alliance OH 44601-5906Directory information current as of the 2015-2016 Report Card publication date Alliance City CTPD

Career TechPlanning District:

Your District's Students

AverageDaily

Enrollment:

2,281

Enrollment by Subgroup

Am. Indian / Alaskan Native

Asian or Pacific Islander

Black, Non-Hispanic

Hispanic

Multiracial

White, Non-Hispanic

Students with Disabilities

Economically Disadvantaged

Limited English Proficiency

Migrant

Enrollment # Enrollment %

NC

NC

1.9%42

2.3%52

3.3%75

92.2%2,102

12.0%274

41.1%938

1.3%29

0.9%20

NC = Not Calculated because there are fewer than 10 in the group

Number ofLimitedEnglish

ProficiencyStudents

Excluded fromAccountabilityCalculations:

--

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

1.9% 2.3% 3.3%

92.2%

12.0%

41.1%

1.3% 0.9%

American Indian orAlaska...

Asian or Pacific Islander Black, Non-Hispanic

Hispanic Multiracial White, Non-Hispanic

Students withDisabilities

Economic Disadvantage Limited EnglishProficiency

Migrant

Enrollments of less than 10 students are not shown.

State and federal law require an annual assessment of Limited English Proficient (LEP) students to measuretheir English language proficiency. The Ohio English Language Proficiency Assessment (OELPA) is theassessment used in Ohio to gauge LEP students' growth in learning English. For information about yourdistrict's OELPA results, see the Department of Education's web site at http://education.ohio.gov.



Attendance

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%95.2% 95.7%94.5%94.9%95.2%94.6%94.1%95.8%

All Students American Indian orAlaska...


Black, Non-Hispanic Hispanic Multiracial

White, Non-Hispanic Students withDisabilities

Economic Disadvantage

Limited EnglishProficiency

Attendance Rate is not shown if enrollment is less than 10.

ChronicAbsenteeism

Rate:

9.1%


All Students



Black, Non-Hispanic

Hispanic

Multiracial

White, Non-Hispanic




Migrant

Male

Female 95.2%

95.2%

92.8%

95.8%

94.1%

94.6%

95.2%

94.9%

94.5%

95.7%

NC

NC

95.2%

Attendance Rate



0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

8.7%

20.8%

60.0%

8.3% 6.1%14.2%

9.6%

70.8%

87.7%

All Students American Indian orAlaska...


Black, Non-Hispanic Hispanic Multiracial

White, Non-Hispanic Students withDisabilities


Limited EnglishProficiency

Migrant

This chart shows the percentage of students who, because they movedinto or out of the district, did not spend a majority of the school year

within the district.

All Students



Black, Non-Hispanic

Hispanic

Multiracial

White, Non-Hispanic


Economically Disadvantaged


Migrant

District Mobility %

8.7%

NC

NC

20.8%

60.0%

8.3%

6.1%

14.2%

9.6%

70.8%

87.7%


Mobility Rates by Subgroup



Your District's Teachers

Percentage of teachers with at least a Bachelor's Degree

Percentage of teachers with at least a Master's DegreePercentage of core academic subject and elementaryclasses not taught by Highly Qualified Teachers

Percentage of core academic subject and elementaryclasses taught by properly certified teachersPercentage of core academic subject elementary andsecondary classes taught by teachers with temporary,conditional or long-term substitute certification/licensure

All Schools in theDistrict

High PovertySchools

Low PovertySchools

100.0

56.0

0

100

0

0.0 0.0

0.0 0.0

----

-- --

-- --

A district's high poverty schools are those ranked in the top quartile based on the percentage of the district's economically disadvantaged students. Low-poverty schools are those rankedin the bottom quartile based on the percentage of economically disadvantaged students. A district may have buildings in both quartiles, in just one quartile, or in neither quartile.


Attendance Rate

95.8%

Average Salary

$48,533

Average Years ofExperience

13Lead or Senior

Teachers

2.0Your District's PrincipalsEducators in your District

Percentage of principals with atleast a Bachelor's Degree 100.0%

Percentage of principals with atleast a Master's Degree 100.0%

#Per 1000Students

General Education Teachers

Gifted Intervention Specialists

Career-Technical Teachers

Fine Arts Teachers

Music Teachers

Physical Education Teachers

Speech Language Pathologists

Special Education Teachers

96.7

2.0

5.8

45.0

5.6

7.0

14.6

School Counselors

School Nurses

School Psychologists

Interpreters

Library or Media Specialists

Audiologist

Physical/OccupationalTherapistSocial Worker

Teacher Aides

ELL Specialists

Adaptive Physical EducationTeachers

0.0

4.0 1.7

0.0 0.0

0.0 0.0

2.0 0.9

4.5 2.0

0.0 0.0

0.0 0.0

0.0 0.0

42.4

2.5

6.4

0.0 0.0

0.9

19.7

0.0

2.4

3.1

0.0 0.0

2.0 0.9

State Avgper 1000Students

2.3

1.1

1.2

0.2

1.4

0.0

0.8

0.2

46.4

2.3

10.6

7.0

0.6

3.0

2.5

2.9

0.3

0.0

1.4



66.0%

30.5%

2.1%1.4%

Accomplished Skilled DevelopingIneffective Not Complete

50.0%

50.0%

Accomplished Skilled DevelopingIneffective Not Complete

Teacher Evaluations Principal Evaluations



Wellness and Physical Education

The extent to which students are successful inmeeting the benchmarks contained in Ohio's

physical education standards

Moderate Success

Compliance with the federalrequirement for implementing a

local wellness policy

Elected toadminister BMI

screening

Participation inPhysical Activity

Pilot Program

School Choice Options: Place of Enrollment for Students Residing in the District

Districts and STEM Schools

1,945 students enrolled in the districtwhere they lived

149 students enrolled in anotherpublic district through OpenEnrollment

30 students enrolled in anotherpublic district by means otherthan Open Enrollment

Community Schools

38 students enrolled in an onlinecommunity school

3 students enrolled in a site-based community school

2 students enrolled in a DropoutPrevention and RecoveryProgram (online or site-based)*

Non-Public Schools*

0 students participated in theEdChoice Scholarship orCleveland Scholarship Program

3 students participated in theEdChoice Expansion Program

5 students participated in theOhio Autism Scholarship or JonPeterson Special NeedsScholarship Program

*ODE does not collect and cannot reportinformation on district residents who are non-

voucher students attending a non-public school.

The School Choice Options data is a set of nine counts describing the place of enrollment for students residing in the school district, captured as a snapshotof a single day in the school year. Web links provide further information about certain options.

No data returned for this view. Thismight be because the applied filterexcludes all data.

Fine Arts Courses Offered

No Fine Arts Coursesare offered by thisdistrict.

*Students included in Dropout Prevention andRecovery Program counts are also included in

either the online or site-based communityschool counts.



Financial DataThese measures answer several questions about spending and performance. How much is spent on Classroominstruction? How much, on average, is spent on each student? What is the source of the revenue? How do thesemeasures compare to other districts and schools?

Comparison Group: Enrollment between 1000 and 2499

Classroom Spending Data

66.8%

33.2%

What percent of funds arespent on classroom

instruction?

66.7%

How does this district rank incomparison to other districts

of similar size?

143 out of 276

Comparison Group State

66.7%

33.3%

67.2%

32.8%

Classroom Instruction Non-Classroom Instruction

District

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

A rank of 1 indicates the highest percent spenton classroom instruction.

Spending per Pupil Data

District State

Operating Spending per Pupil $7,642 $8,840

Classroom Instruction $5,094 $5,942

Non-Classroom Spending $2,548 $2,898

$4,000 $6,000 $8,000 $10,000

District

State

Marlington Local IS among the 20% of public districts with the lowestoperating expenditures per pupil

Marlington Local IS NOT among the 20% of public districts with thehighest academic performance index scores.

Note: District financial data do not include data associated with community schools that are sponsored by the school district.


Spending and PerformanceThis measure answers the question – what is the relationship of average spending per student to performance, and how does that compare to similar districts and schools?

Similar Districts

P e r f o r m a n c e I n d e x

Spending per Pupil

60.0

70.0

80.0

90.0

100.0

110.0

120.0

$0 $4,000

$8,000

$12,000

$16,000

$20,000

$24,000

$28,000

$32,000

All Districts


Spending per Pupil

60.0

70.0

80.0

90.0

100.0

110.0

120.0

$0 $4,000

$8,000

$12,000

$16,000

$20,000

$24,000

$28,000

$32,000

Comparison Group

60.0

70.0

80.0

90.0

100.0

110.0

120.0

$0 $4,000

$8,000

$12,000

$16,000

$20,000

$24,000

$28,000

$32,000


Spending per Pupil


Source of Revenue

Source of Funds District State Total

Local

State

Federal

Other Non-Tax

Total

$8,477,315 33.5%

$11,514,356 45.6%

$1,579,845 6.3%

$3,701,779 14.6%

$25,273,295 100.0%

$8,697,598,445 39.5%

$10,072,007,846 45.7%

$1,699,267,399 7.7%

$1,562,415,185 7.1%

$22,031,288,875 100.0%

34%

46%

6%

15%

Local StateFederal Other Non-Tax

District

40%

8%

46%

7%

40%

8%

46%

7%

Local FederalState Other Non-Tax

State



Superintendent:Address:

Joseph A. Knoll10320 Moulin Ave NEAlliance OH 44601-5906

Phone:County:

(330) 823-7458Stark

Your District's Schools

School Achievement Progress Gap Closing Graduation Rate K-3 Literacy Prepared for Success

Lexington Elementary School C B F NR D NRMarlboro Elementary School C D C NR NR NR

Marlington High School D D F A NR CMarlington Middle School C A F NR NR NR

Washington Elementary School B B B NR D NR

Main.aspx?server=edumstrisd02&project=ReportCard&evt=2048001&documentID=CEBC698F4338B9EBCF0B70BEB900086F&elementsPromptAnswers=12464469479F3EB7271EAC9F60825699;12464469479F3EB7271EAC9F60825699%3A020230&hiddenSections=header,dockTop,dockLeft,footer,path&uid=guest







No data returned for this view. This might be because the applied filter excludes all data.

Marlington Local School District...IRN: 049882 Printed on August 17, 2017 Page 3 of 31 2015 - 2016...

Documents

Transcript of Marlington Local School District...IRN: 049882 Printed on August 17, 2017 Page 3 of 31 2015 - 2016...