Market Realities and Change Management to Accelerate ... › buildings › ... · VOC Co ectionT...
Transcript of Market Realities and Change Management to Accelerate ... › buildings › ... · VOC Co ectionT...
Cost Effective Energy Retrofit Team
Market Realities and Change Management
to Accelerate Adoption of Cost Effective
Residential Energy Efficiency Retrofits
Update August 10, 2011
Cost Effective Energy Retrofit Team Jeff Alcott, Dow Chemical
Elena Enache-Pommer, Dow Chemical
1
Cost Effective Energy Retrofit Team
Cost Effective Energy Retrofit Team
Jeff Alcott, Dow Chemical Teresa Angsten, Dow Chemical
Elena Enache-Pommer, Dow Chemical Chris Hall, Kent County Habitat for Humanity
Brian Holton, Ferris State University
Mike Mazor, Dow Chemical Arn McIntyre, Ferris State University Energy Center
Dr. Tim Mrozowski, Michigan State University
Gary Parsons, Dow Chemical Kaethe Schuster, Dow Chemical
Dr. Matt Syal, Michigan State University
Dr. Suk-Kyung Kim, Michigan State University
2
Cost Effective Energy Retrofit Team
Project Update
1. Research Objective
2. Roadmap
3. Process stages
3
Cost Effective Energy Retrofit Team
Research Objective Building America Implementation STC
The Building America goal is for 1.3 million homes to have energy efficiency retrofits by the end of 2013
Past experience shows we need a new way of accelerating the adoption and implementation rate of energy efficiency retrofit best practices to achieve our goal.
Research Priorities: • Value Chain • Best Business Practices • Information Delivery Mechanisms • Business Models to achieve success
4
Cost Effective Energy Retrofit Team
Research Objective
Develop a sustainable "Business model“ that
increases the adoption rate of Residential
Energy Efficiency Upgrades using Building
America knowledge
5
Cost Effective Energy Retrofit Team
Roadmap
Design for Six Sigma Methodology A development process that identifies and uses CUSTOMER
NEEDS / REQUIREMENTS and data-based decisions to drive
to a SUSTAINABLE SOLUTION
6
Cost Effective Energy Retrofit Team
Roadmap
Design For Six Sigma
Development process stages: 1. Define - Plan 2. Measure - Collect & analyze Voice-of-the-Customer data
We are here - (Measure stage is about 50% completed)
3. Explore - Formulate & qualify solution concepts 4. Develop - Establish & validate the ideal solution 5. Implement - Execute plans to sustain-the-gain
7
Cost Effective Energy Retrofit Team
Roadmap Comments
• Continuous efforts through Six Sigma to achieve predictable process results • Characteristics that can be measured, analyzed, improved and controlled • Achieving sustained quality improvement requires commitment from the entire organization, including top-level leaders • A clear commitment on making decisions on the basis of verifiable data, rather than assumptions
8
VOC Co ection T melinePesp 13
-11
14-
1115
-11
16-
1117
-11
18-
1119
-11
20-
1121
-11
22-
1123
-11
24-
1125
-11
26-
1127
-11
28-
1129
-11
30-
111-
112-
113-
114-
115-
116-
117-
118-
119-
1110
-J-1
111
-J-1
112
-J-1
113
-J-1
114
-J-1
115
-J-1
116
-J-1
117
-J-1
118
-J-1
119
-J-1
120
-J-1
121
-J-1
122
-J-1
123
-J-1
124
-J-1
125
-J-1
126
-J-1
127
-J-1
128
-J-1
129
-J-1
130
-J-1
1
blis In Te ailab fo V Al
Co Te fo VOC Al
Id how to web ta An
Te to Mit h to ir of to up fa to fa VOC
Cost Effective Energy Retrofit Team
Process Stage: DEFINE
Project Plan
Project Charter
Research Goal: Sustainable "Business model“ that increases the adoption rate of Residential Energy Efficiency Upgrades using Building America knowledge
9
ll i rs on
re onsible
Jun-
Jun-
Jun-
Jun-
Jun-
Jun-
Jun-
Jun-
Jun-
Jun-
Jun-
Jun-
Jun-
Jun-
Jun-
Jun-
Jun-
Jun-
Jul-
Jul-
Jul-
Jul-
Jul-
Jul-
Jul-
Jul-
Jul- ul ul ul ul ul ul ul ul ul ul ul ul ul ul ul ul ul ul ul ul ul
31-J
ul-1
11-
Aug-
112-
Aug-
113-
Aug-
114-
Aug-
115-
Aug-
116-
Aug-
117-
Aug-
118-
Aug-
119-
Aug-
1110
-Aug
-11
11-A
ug-1
112
-Aug
-11
13-A
ug-1
114
-Aug
-11
15-A
ug-1
116
-Aug
-11
17-A
ug-1
118
-Aug
-11
19-A
ug-1
1
Esta h terview ams av ility r O cott x nfirm am calendar r collection cott x entify ‐ sites rgets gs ten x resa contact c conf m use
recuiter set ce‐ ‐ ce interviews Angs ten
?
Negotiation with NREL to obtain TO2 singature Ma zor & Mitch
x
Establish VOC Recuiter agreement Angs ten x Establish Homeowner & Contractor screener for Recuiter Angs ten
x
Complete VOC Interviewer training fro Interview Team Angs ten
x x
Finalize Interview guide (Interview Topics & Questions by audience & review with interview Teams Angs ten
x x
Obtain camera (4) & digital recorder (4) for site visits Al cott
x
Identify a transcription service for digital recorded VOC discussions Al cott
X
Determine VOC data analysis possibilities with MSU & FSU Enache
x
Confirm VOC data analysis process (& consultant?)
Angsten/Mazor/E nache
Quantitative VOC collection (MSU??) Angs ten
Lansing interviews (Lansing Team review at end of each day) Syal
x x x
Detr oit interviews (Detroit Team review at end of each day) Mazor
x x x
Fort Wayne interviews (Fort Wayne Team review at end of each day) Angs ten
x x x
Grand Rapids interviews (Grand Rapids Team review at end of each day) McIntyre
x x x
Chicago interviews (Chicago Team review at end of each day) Parsons
x x x
Review meeting all Interview Teams to capture key learnings. Al l
x
Interview Teams complete Influencer telephone interviews Al l
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
VOC data analysis & Customer Needs ID Tea m
Solution design concepts by December 31, 2011
Proposed solution & implementation plans by June 1, 2012
Cost Effective Energy Retrofit Team
Process Stage: MEASURE (current status)
Value Chain Flow of Knowledge
Flow of Money Value Chain members at the table
Flow of Materials when the decision is made: Homeowners(10 diagrams) Contractors
Retail/Lumber yard
10
Value Chain Stakeholder
Interview objectivesinformation needed to define customer needs
Who to interview
How to interview Interview Topics Interview Questions
Ex s ng research data to
support?
VOC Verbatims from interviews
(used to define Customer Needs)
Cost Effective Energy Retrofit Team
Process Stage: MEASURE (current status)
Voice-of-the Customer Collection Plan
Who, Why, What, When & How Reviewed & received input from Building America
Expert meeting June 1, 2011
Value Chain Stakeholder
Interview objectives‐‐information needed to define customer needs
Who to interview
How to interview Interview Topics Interview Questions
Exiisttiing research data to
support?
VOC Verbatims from interviews
(used to define Customer Needs)
HoHommee ownowneerrss (&(& RenRenttaall//LLeaeasseess PrProoppeerrttyy OOwwnenerrss/O/Opeperraattoorrss))
1.1. WhWhaatt wwillill momottiivvaattee hohommeeowneownerrss toto pupurrcchashasee ththee ininssttaallallattiioonn ofof EEEE rerettrrooffitit
HoHommeeoowwnneerrss QQuuaall.. VOVOCC ArAree yoyouu sasattiisfsfiieedd wiwitthh ththee heheatat && ccoooolinlingg cocommffoorrtt inin yoyouurr homhomee??
PlePleaassee tetellll usus aboabouutt yoyouurr ccuurrerrenntt lelevevell ofof ssaatitissffaacctitioonn wiwitthh ththee iindondooror tetemmppeerraattuurree anandd aassocssociiaatteedd comcomfforortt lelevevell inin yoyouurr hohommee..
2.2. WhWhaatt wwillill momottiivvaattee hohommeeowneownerrss toto pupurrcchashasee andand ininssttaallll EEEE rerettrrooffititss (D(DIIYY))
HoHoww mumucchh dodo yoyouu spspeenndd onon enenererggyy uuttilitilitieiess??
InIn ththiinnkikinngg ababoouutt yoyouurr mmoontnthlhlyy enenererggyy uuttiliilittyy bbillsills,, cacann yoyouu tetellll meme onon avaveerragagee whwhatat yoyouu spspeenndd inin ththee summsummeerrttiimmee?? InIn ththee wiwintnteerr mmoontnthshs??
3.3. WhWhaatt wwillill hehellpp enenssuurree ththee hohommeeowneownerr susussttaaiinn thethe gagainin (f(feeeeddbbaacckk // seserrvviiccee coconnttrraacctt // ongongooiinngg ffeedeedbbaacckk memecchhaanniissmm // lolonngg teterrmm rerelalattiioonnsshhiipp))
WhWhaatt woulwouldd mmootitivavatete yoyouu inin imimpprroovviningg ththee enenererggyy sasavviinnggss ofof yoyouurr hohommee??
WhWhatat wowouulldd mmootitivvaatete yoyouu momosstt toto imimpprroovvee ththee enenererggyy efefffiicceennccyy ofof yoyouurr hohommee?? ProProbbee afaftteerr ininititiaiall rreespspoonnsese:: InIncecennttiivveess,, rerebbaatteess,, bbillill sasavviinnggs,s, imimpprroovveedd hohommee cocommffoorrtt,, enenvviirroonnmmeennttaall imimppaacctt,, etetcc..
YY
4.4. WhWhaatt vavalliiddaattiioonn ofof ththee bebenenefifitt oror cocosstt sasavviinnggss isis ththee homhomeeowneownerr expexpeeccttiinngg
WhWhaatt dodo yoyouu ththiinnkk yoyouurr hohommee nneedeedss forfor grgreeaatteerr enenererggyy efefffiicciieennccyy??
WhWhatat iimmpprroovvememenenttss cocouulldd yoyouu mamakkee toto yoyouurr homhomee toto mamakkee itit momorree eneneerrggyy efefffiicciieenntt??
5.5. WhWhaatt woulwouldd sasattiisfsfyy ththee hohommeeowownenerr toto knknooww ththaatt ththee EEEE reretrotroffitit hashas bbeeneen cocommpplleetteedd cocorrrreeccttllyy
WhWhaatt araree yoyouu wwiillinllingg toto spespenndd onon enenererggyy efefffiicciieennccyy iimmpprroovvememenenttss??
WoWouulldd yoyouu bebe wwillinillingg toto spspeenndd monmoneeyy toto mamakkee yoyouurr homhomee momorree enenererggyy efefffiicciienentt?? IfIf soso,, hohoww mumucchh (w(wiitthhiinn aa titimmee frfraammee,, toto lolowweerr enenererggyy bbiillslls byby X%X%,, etetcc.. ‐‐ nneedeedss aa poipoinntt ofof rereffeerreennccee))
6.6. WhWhaatt dodoeess enenererggyy eeffifficciieenncycy memeaann toto ththiiss ststaakkeehhoollddeerr??
WhWhaatt isis ththee vvaaluluee//rerettuurnrn yoyouu expexpeecctt wiwitthh EEEE trtrooffiitt imimpprroovveemmeennttss??
WhWhatat wowouulldd bebe aa memeaanniinnggffulul rerettuurnrn onon yoyouurr ininvveessttmmeenntt inin mamakkiinngg yoyouurr hohommee mormoree enenererggyy efefffiicciienentt?? ThThaatt isis,, whatwhat wowouulldd mamakkee yoyouu ffeeleel lilikkee ththee monmoneeyy yoyouu spspeenntt wawass aa ggoodood ininvveessttmmeenntt.. ProProbbee:: SaSavvee sasammee amamoouunntt inin uuttilityility cocossttss inin aa cecerrttaaiinn amamoonntt ofof titimmee ‐‐ whwhaatt isis ththaatt titimmee ‐‐ rereffeererennccee nenexxtt quequessttiioonn
7.7. WhWhaatt araree thethe bbaarrierrierrss toto EEEE rerettrrooffitit?? EEmmoottioionnaal,l, momoninittaarryy,, phyphyssiicacall,, titimmiingng
WhWhaatt papayybbaacckk titimmee peperriioodd wowouulldd yoyouu expexpeecctt wiwitthh EEEE rerettrrooffitit imimpprroovveemmeennt?t?
YY
8.8. IsIs ththeerree aa pprreeffeerrerredd seseqquueennccee toto enenaabbllee EEEE rerettrrooffititss (tr(truusstt,, cceeddiibbilitility,y, rerelalattiioonnsshhipipss,, inin adadddiittiioonn toto tetecchhnonollooggyy andand pprrooductsducts e.e.gg..))
WhWheerree dodoeess enenererggyy eeffifficciieenncycy iimmpprroovvememenentt fifitt inin yoyouurr hohommee bbudgeudgett prpriioorriititieess??
InIn teterrmmss ofof alalll ofof ththee thithinnggss onon aa toto‐‐dodo lislistt foforr yoyouurr hohommee,, whewherree dodoeess enenererggyy efefffiicciieennccyy falfalll onon ththaatt lislistt ‐‐ isis itit hihigghh,, loloww,, mimiddddllee prpriioorriity,ty, notnot yeyett ccoonnssiidderereded?? WhWhaatt cocommeess bebeffoorree enenererggyy efefffiicciienenccyy iimmpprroovvememenenttss onon thethe lislistt??
9.9. WhWheerree areare yoyouu ggeettittinngg yoyouurr ininffoormrmaattioionn?? (tr(truusstt??))
UUndenderr whwhatat ccoondindittiionsons wowouulldd yoyouu tatakeke ououtt aa hohomeme eqequuiittyy loloaann toto paypay foforr enenererggyy sasavviingngss iimmpprroovvememenenttss??
IfIf yoyouu wewerree ccoonnssidideerriningg mamakkiinngg enenererggyy efefffiicciieennccyy imimpprroovveemmeenntsts toto yoyouurr homhomee,, whwhiicchh ofof ththee ffoollollowwiinngg optoptiionsons wowouulldd yoyouu mostmost lilikkeellyy ccoonnssidideerr//uuttilizeilize inin teterrmmss ofof paypayiinngg forfor ththee mamatteerriiaallss oror papayiyinngg aa coconnttrraactctoorr toto dodo ththee worworkk:: PaPayy wiwitthh cacasshh,, ususee aa crcreeddiitt cacarrdd,, homhomee eqequuiittyy loloaann,, peperrssonalonal loloaann,, ototheherr..
Qualitative VOC 50 face-to-face VOC
interviews with Value Chain decision makers
(Detroit, Chicago, Lansing & Grand Rapids)
50 telephone VOC interviews with Value Chain Influencers
Quantitative VOC (tbd based on qual. VOC)
11
Cost Effective Energy Retrofit Team
Process Stage: MEASURE (current status)
Voice-of-the-Customer Data Collection Preparation
Interviews guides for each Interviewer training Interviewee recruiting & schedulingValue Chain stakeholder
• Homeowner • Contractor • Retail/Lumber yard
Date Time
7-19 10:00 AM
7-19 2:00 PM
7-19 2:00 PM
7-20 8:30 AM
7-20 10:00 AM
7-20 10:30 AM
7-20 2:00 PM
7-20 3:00 PM
7-21 8:30 AM
7-21 10:00 AM
7-21 1:00 PM
7-21 3:30 PM Edmundo Q. Homeowner XXX
Katherine I. Homeowner XXX
Tom C. Homeowner XXX
Matt Z. Contractor -
General Remodeling
XXX
Ashraf A. Contractor - Areas
HVAC knowledgeable
XXX
Ira R. Lumberyard Employee XXX
Michael R. Homeowner XXX
Katherine D. Homeowner XXX
Mike S. Contactor -
General XXX
Lyle S. Contractor -Remodeler XXX
William (Bill) M. Contractor -General XXX
Christine R. Homeowner XXX
Segment Meeting Place Address Name
12
Cost Effective Energy Retrofit Team
Process Stage: MEASURE (current status)
Voice-of-the-Customer Data Collection (~50% completed)
Completed: Face-to-face Qualitative VOC interviews with Value Chain decision makers- Homeowners, Contractors & Retail / Lumber yards (Detroit, Chicago, Lansing & Grand Rapids)
In-progress: • Face-to-face VOC interviews with Utilities companies (new)
• Telephone VOC interviews with Value Chain Influencers (bldg material suppliers, energy auditors, industry associations, DIY websites, govt, bldg science experts, realtors, consumer advocacy groups)
• Quantitative VOC (tbd based on qual. VOC)
13
Cost Effective Energy Retrofit Team
Process Stage: MEASURE (Next Step)
Voice-of-the-Customer data
CustomerAffinity process
Needs [ to achieve Research Goal ]
Needs Features
Measures
Quantitative VOC Collection Plan
(Margin of error target: +/-5 pts @ 95%conf.)
14
Cost Effective Energy Retrofit Team
Process Stage: MEASURE (Next Step)
House of Quality Design Measures
Critical Customer Requirements
Customer Needs
Customer Needs (from Qual. VOC) <‐
‐‐Impo
rtan
ce Rating (1 ‐5 most impo
rtant)
Time to
find
EE retrofit info/services (hou
rs)
% Sales
call efficien
cy (w
ork contracts/sales calls)
BBB ratin
g of
service prov
ider
Time to
iden
tify EE
retrofit op
portun
ities
(hou
rs)
EE re
trofit To
tal Cost ($)
Time to
validate EE
retrofit saving
s (hou
rs)
Hom
eowne
r cash flo
w ($
/mo.)
Hom
eowne
r payba
ck period (yea
rs)
No.
of financing
options
available
Relationships matrix
Design Measures
Time to
com
plete fin
ancing
(hou
rs)
Cred
it ratin
g change
with
fina
ncing
Cost
of follow‐up correctio
ns &
repairs
($)
Time to
com
plete im
prov
emen
t installatio
ns (h
ours)
Cost
of corrections/rep
airs
not
in service
quo
te ($
)
Time to
con
firm
cod
e compliance (hou
rs)
CO2 level (pp
m)
VOC (ppm
)
% EE retrofit material in de
aler/retailer stock
Customer Perception Rating of Current Situation [from Quant. VOC]
HO Weatherization service readily available to homeowner
Di rec ti on of Improvement ‐‐>
4 ❾
↓ ↑ ↑ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↑ ↓ ↑ ↓ ↔ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↑ 1 2
*
3 4 5
Strong
HO Weatherization service has convincing value proposition 5
❾ O ③ ③ ❾ ❾ ③ ③ O O O * Medium
HO Confidence in contractor/service company 5 ③ O O O O O * Weak
WC/HO Efficient way to identify specific energy saving options for each home 4
❾ ❾ *
WC/HO Efficient way to validate specific energy savings for each improvement option 5
❾ ❾ ③ ③ *
HO
HO
HO
Guaranteed positive cash flow of retrofit
Easy process for financing
Will not affect credit rating
5
5
3
❾ ③
③ ❾
❾
*
* *
WC/HO
HO
Efficient plans to implement each improvement option
Valuable installation warranty
4
3
③ ③ ③ ③ ③
❾
❾ ③ O O
*
*
HO
WC/HO
WC/CO
Work causes no additional damages
Quick improvement installation
Complies with building code
2
3
4
③ ③ ❾
❾
O
❾
O
*
* *
HO
WC
WC
No health concerns (CO2, radon etc)
Easy to complete (DIY)
Materials readily available
4
4
4
③ ③ ❾
❾ ❾
❾
*
*
* DR
Design Targets: [from VOC / other]
Know what materials will sell
Technical Competitive Assessment:
4
Difficulty Rating:
Relative importance:
<0.25
36 102
75% >B+
20 61
<0.5
O
?
48 86
<0.5 >$20
117 87
<5 3
15 65
[Select CCRs]
<0.25 0
27 39
0 <16
119 30
0 <0.1
53 45
N.D. N.D.
45 36
100%
*
Targets & requirements
Quantitative VOC data (Margin of error target: +/-5 pts @ 95%conf.))
15
Cost Effective Energy Retrofit Team
Process Stage: EXPLORE (By end of 2011)
Critical Customer Develop Design ConceptsRequirements Functional Analysis
Critical Customer Requirements Functions Secondary function Secondary function
Time to complete improvement installations (hours) Selects right installation technique Understand situation Confirm construction details Time to confirm code compliance (hours) Complete FMEA CO level (ppm) Plan job Define removals VOC (ppm) Define installations
Define materials Complete improvements Obtain materials
Complete procedure Clean‐up Determine final performance
Time to identify EE retrofit opportunities (hours) Identifies right customers Define housing demographics Understand housing ages Understand housing constructions
Time to validate EE retrofit savings (hours) Identifies right improvements Define defects Define situation Determine initial performance
Define opportunities Identify opportunities Evaluate tradeoffs Confirm improvement opportunities Define net energy savings
Homeowner cash flow ($/mo.) Saves money & Incentivizes purchase Define savings Calculate cost savings Homeowner payback period (years) Define costs Calculate material costs EE retrofit Total Cost ($) Calculate labor costs Time to complete financing (hours) Calculate overhead costs
Define financing Check lender financing options Select best financing option
% Sales call efficiency (work contracts/sales calls) Identifies right sales/cost saving message Define message Define value proposition
Define improvements Establish credibility
generate concepts [ to achieve Research Goal ]
Functional analysis
Functions [that satisfy the CCRs/Customer Needs]
A B C . . .
1 2 3 . . . .
Design Concepts [Business model characteristics that meet all customer requirements/functions]
Expert system +
Delivery system
+ y
Difficulty 2
Savings 3
Time 1
Cost 3
Resources 2
A 9 9 4 7 3 76 B 7 5 3 9 5 69 C 4 1 1 10 8 58 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Criteria & Weight Concept Sum
Best-fit Concept Selection
Best “Business model” Concept
16
Cost Effective Energy Retrofit Team
Process Stage:
DEVELOP (1H 2012)
• Develop detailed “business model” design
• Functional capability assessment
• Validation
• Implementation plan
Implementation to be decided 2H 2012
17
Cost Effective Energy Retrofit Team
THANK YOU! Questions?
18