Market Feedback mapped to Stress Categories Morten Løgstrup Christensen August 2013.

7
Market Feedback mapped to Stress Categories Morten Løgstrup Christensen August 2013

Transcript of Market Feedback mapped to Stress Categories Morten Løgstrup Christensen August 2013.

Page 1: Market Feedback mapped to Stress Categories Morten Løgstrup Christensen August 2013.

Market Feedback mapped to

Stress Categories

Morten Løgstrup ChristensenAugust 2013

Page 2: Market Feedback mapped to Stress Categories Morten Løgstrup Christensen August 2013.

The purpose of mapping market feedback to stress categories is to find the dominating scenarios leading to negative market feedback. This information is important when:

• Assessing the level of robustness towards the end-user

• Assessing risks

• Designing new effective tests with focus on achieving a high level of robustness towards the end-user and avoid negative market feedback

• Prioritizing test activities during product development

Scope

Page 3: Market Feedback mapped to Stress Categories Morten Løgstrup Christensen August 2013.

Stress Categories

Stress Categories No.Extreme Force/Torque 1Humidity 2Impact/Drop 3Liquid 4Dust/Dirt 5Mech. Fatique/Wear 6Use Behaviour 7Surface Wear 8Chemicals 9Production/Supplier Process 10Unknown 11Insulin on/inside pen 12

Page 4: Market Feedback mapped to Stress Categories Morten Løgstrup Christensen August 2013.

Codes

When products are returned from the market with a reported fault they are often investigated or repaired.During repair or investigation a code is typically assigned stating the technical finding.

In Novo Nordisk they are called Result Codes.

Page 5: Market Feedback mapped to Stress Categories Morten Løgstrup Christensen August 2013.

Mapping

“General : Foreign Dry Matter – Handling” “Dust/Dirt”

Result Code Stress Category

Each Result Code for a given product are mapped to the most dominating stress category

Page 6: Market Feedback mapped to Stress Categories Morten Løgstrup Christensen August 2013.

Market Feedback are analysed using Mapped Data

Which stresses or events are causing faulty products?

0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% 18% 20% 22% 24% 26% 28% 30% 32% 34% 36% 38% 40%

Mech. Fatique/Wear

Chemicals

Humidity

Insulin on/inside pen

Extreme Force/Torque

Unknown

Impact/Drop

Liquid

Production/Supplier Process

Dust/Dirt

Use Behaviour

Result Codes mapped to Stress Categories

Stress Categories

Count of Result Code

Product X

Page 7: Market Feedback mapped to Stress Categories Morten Løgstrup Christensen August 2013.

Market Feedback using Mapped Data

Does the reason for negative market feedback change over time?

0.00%

5.00%

10.00%

15.00%

20.00%

25.00%

30.00%

35.00%

40.00%

45.00%

50.00%

% o

f Sub

Tot

als

(cou

nt fo

r the

per

iod)

Time

Development of Stress Contribution

Use Behaviour

Dust/Dirt

Production/Supplier Process

Liquid

Impact/Drop

Unknown

Extreme Force/Torque

Insulin on/inside pen

Humidity

Chemicals

Mech. Fatique/Wear

Product X