Marine Strategy Framework Directive: Goals and Challenges Johanna Karhu EU Marine and Fisheries...
-
Upload
misael-shire -
Category
Documents
-
view
220 -
download
2
Transcript of Marine Strategy Framework Directive: Goals and Challenges Johanna Karhu EU Marine and Fisheries...
Marine Strategy Framework Directive: Goals and Challenges
Johanna KarhuEU Marine and Fisheries Policy Officer
Birdlife Europe
• MSFD adopted in July 2008• Transposed into national law• Aim: Take measures to maintain or achieve good
environmental status (GES) by 2020:
Protect, preserve, restore and prevent deterioration
of the marine environment
Prevent and reduce inputs in the marine
environment, with a view to phasing out pollution
Apply an ecosystem-based approach to managing human activities, and
ensure collective pressures don’t
compromise GES
Good Environmental Status
“the environmental status of marine waters where these provide ecologically diverse and dynamic oceans and seas which are clean, healthy and productive within their intrinsic conditions, and the use of the marine environment is at a level that is sustainable, thus safeguarding the potential for uses and activities by current and future generations” (Art 3[5])
...by 2020 at the latest
• First legislative instrument for marine biodiversity policy in EU
• Member States have to develop Marine Strategies applying ecosystem approach to the management of human activities
• Regional cooperation required at each stage• EC decision on criteria and methodological
standards on GES
11 Descriptors• Descriptor 1: Biological diversity • Descriptor 2: Non-indigenous species • Descriptor 3: Population of commercial fish / shell fish • Descriptor 4: Elements of marine food webs • Descriptor 5: Eutrophication • Descriptor 6: Sea floor integrity • Descriptor 7: Alteration of hydrographical conditions • Descriptor 8: Contaminants • Descriptor 9: Contaminants in fish and seafood for human
consumption • Descriptor 10: Marine litter • Descriptor 11: Introduction of energy, including underwater noise
Regional Seas
• Coordinating work regionally• Working to deliver GES for
Marine Regions• A role for Regional Seas
Conventions, e.g. HELCOM• MS have to consider
implications beyond their boundaries
July 2008
Directive transposed
Initial assessment of national marine status
Determine GES for each region, targets and indicators
Monitoring programme established;(& MPAs progress report)
Programme of measures designed
Programme of measures operational
GES is achieved
2010 2015 2020 2012 2014 2016
Agree GES descriptor criteria, etc
State of our Seas• Initial assessment of the current state of the
EU’s seas – due 15/10/2012• Monitoring• Regular review – every 6 years
Spatial Tools• MPAs are specifically mentioned• MSs are to report on MPA implementation
progress • Marine planning is inferred, new Maritime
Spatial Planning Directive just adopted by EC
Integration
• Environmental concerns must be integrated into other relevant policies and legislative measures, e.g. the CFP and the Integrated Maritime Policy.
• The Commission is required to ensure that fisheries measures (particularly the reform of the CFP) meet the requirements of GES.
Costs vs GES
Action is not required where the costs would be disproportionate
Caveats• taking account of the risks to the marine
environment• provided that there is no further deterioration• Must also look at the costs of doing nothing or
of allowing environmental degradation• Must justify lack of action to the European
Commission
Where are we now?• Member States had to submit their Art. 8
Initial assessment, Art. 9 Determination of GES and Art. 10 Environmental targets & indicators by 15/10/2012
• Bulgaria, Ireland, Malta and Poland have not yet submitted their reports and Portugal, Slovenia and UK have only partially submitted
http://ec.europa.eu/environment/marine/eu-coast-and-marine-policy/implementation/scoreboard_en.htm
Results of ESEC survey on NGO experiences
• 31 NGO responses• Concerns: not enough financial resources, lack of
awareness among NGOs and stakeholders, lack of concrete targets, MS relying on existing commitments to reach GES,
• Main gaps in reports and knowledge: biodiversity and food web, non-commercial fish, energy/noise impacts, marine litter, contaminants etc..
• Main concerns with reports: targets too generic, lack of data used for not setting clear targets, insufficient coordiantion between authorities, lack of precautionary approach
• Public consultations in MS: 59% indicated that they were involved at the end of reporting process and 26% from the start of the process
Remaining challenges• Attaining necessary scientific knowledge for
defining the state of marine environment• Financing• Integration of sectoral policies• Dissemination and communication on the
marine environment• Enhanced stakeholder participation at all
levels
What happens next?• The Commission has 6 months to review the MS
initial assessments, determination of GES and setting targets and indicators
• The work will focus on developing monitoring programmes for assessments by 15/07/2014
• Programme of measures to achieve/maintain GES 15/07/2015
• Entry into operation by 15/07/2016• Only 4 years to achieve GES